Safety Zone; Macy's July 4th Fireworks, East River and Upper New York Bay, NY, 18343-18346 [05-7209]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 68 / Monday, April 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules
expanding the list of eligible activities
to include the following: Painting
programs and preventative maintenance
for off-system structures, scour
countermeasures on all bridges, safety
improvements, additional sets of load
posting signs, activities related to load
rating and analysis, activities for
development and implementation of
bridge management systems, and
specific preventative maintenance
activities. Ionia County, Michigan,
suggested the removal of historical
inventory activities from eligibility. The
Wyoming DOT, NACE, Ionia County
and Alcona County suggested the
removal or clarification of calcium
magnesium acetate and other deicing
chemicals from eligibility.
Many State DOTs recommended that
activities be made applicable for all
structures irrespective of eligibility. The
California and Iowa DOTs also
suggested clarifying and specifically
restricting HBP funds for structures
carrying automobile traffic. The Virginia
DOT and AASHTO suggested
applicability of the funds for safety
improvements irrespective of bridge
eligibility. The Wyoming and Illinois
DOT’s, and NACE suggested
applicability of funds for load posting
signs irrespective of eligibility criteria.
The AASHTO and the Kansas DOT
recommended that historic bridge
activities should be eligible regardless of
bridge eligibility status.
County agencies and trade
associations expressed concerns that the
additional flexibility added through the
alternate program favored State agencies
at the expense of local agency bridge
owners. Concerns focused on whether
the alternate program would divert
funds from localities. The NACE and
IACE urged that the proposed regulation
be amended to ensure that the alternate
program be applicable for State and
local agencies independently and that
additional flexibility be given to
localities independent of the policies of
State bridge owning agencies. The
AASHTO, Kansas DOT, and Delaware
County, New York also suggested
addressing issues that are not currently
part of the regulation, including the tenyear rule 1 and the sufficiency rating
formula.2 The California DOT, Wyoming
DOT and AASHTO also suggested
removing FHWA approval of bridge
1 The FHWA ‘‘10-year rule’’ policy prevents a
bridge from remaining eligible for HBRRP funding
for a period of 10 years after construction or major
reconstruction has taken place.
2 The sufficiency rating is a method of evaluating
highway bridge data considering structural
condition, functionality and essentiality for public
use to obtain a numeric value which is indicative
of bridge sufficiency to remain in service.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Apr 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
management systems and systematic
processes, requirements for
conformance of preventative
maintenance with design standards,
requirements of funds to be used on
Federal-aid structures, modification of
the unit cost criteria, and sufficiency
rating eligibility assessment.
The Advocates for Highway and
Automotive Safety (AHAS) expressed
concern as to whether the alternate
program proposed violated the
provisions of 23 U.S.C. 144, which it
states ‘‘was established to ensure that
funds are dedicated to improving the
nation’s aging bridge infrastructure
* * * [limiting] the use of funds for the
replacement or rehabilitation of
bridges.’’ The AHAS argued that FHWA
does not have the legal authority to
approve the expenditure of HBRRP
funds for activities involving routine
maintenance and repair, deck repaving,
safety improvements and preventative
maintenance activities determined using
a BMS. The authority for preventive
maintenance activities is set forth in 23
U.S.C.§ 116(d). Preventive maintenance
activities shall be eligible for Federal
assistance under title 23 if the State
demonstrates that the activity is a costeffective means of extending the useful
life of a Federal aid highway. The
agency has interpreted that the authority
of § 116(d) extends to all formula
funding programs, including the HBRRP
program to the extent that the activity
funded extends the useful life of a
Federal aid highway, including bridges,
on the Federal-aid system. The alternate
program applied preventive
maintenance to both Federal-aid bridges
and non Federal-aid bridges. The legal
authority of 23 U.S.C. 116(d) does not
apply to the off-system structures and
the proposed rulemaking contravened
current provision of law. If pursued, the
alternate program would have to be
constrained to Federal-aid bridges only,
which constitutes roughly half of the
bridges in the national inventory.
The FHWA has evaluated AHAS’s
concerns. The authority for preventive
maintenance is clearly established in 23
U.S.C. 116(d) for highways (which by
definition includes bridges) on the
Federal-aid system. Permitting the
application of the alternate program for
these bridges does not violate the legal
authority of the FHWA. The NPRM,
however, proposed to apply the
provisions of the alternate program to
both the Federal-aid and non Federalaid system.
Determination
The NPRM proposed to clarify
ambiguous language, incorporate longstanding FHWA policies and, through
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18343
the alternate program, include flexibility
provided to the States through the
Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act (ISTEA) and the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st
Century (TEA–21).
While the FHWA is aware of the
benefits that would result from the
alternate program proposed in the
NPRM, there is no quantitative
information to validate this assumption.
With a proven record, benefits can be
clearly demonstrated. Therefore, further
evaluation of the issues raised by the
NPRM comments, along with the
collection of quantitative information, is
warranted.
Conclusion
For the reasons stated above, the
FHWA withdraws the NPRM and closes
the docket for this rulemaking. The
FHWA intends to consider the
establishment of a special experimental
program to document the benefits of the
alternative program. The program will
likely evaluate a small sample of States
participating on a voluntary,
experimental basis in order to gather
data necessary to determine the success
and need for innovative bridge
management solutions, such as the
alternate bridge program. The FHWA
plans to initiate a separate rulemaking
to include language that would
eliminate ambiguities and incorporate
long-standing policies after the
reauthorization of the surface
transportation program.
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 144 and 315; 49 CFR
1.48.
Issued on: March 31, 2005.
Mary E. Peters,
Federal Highway Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–7210 Filed 4–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01–05–017]
RIN 2115–AA97
Safety Zone; Macy’s July 4th
Fireworks, East River and Upper New
York Bay, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
modify the permanent safety zone for
the annual Macy’s July 4 fireworks
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
18344
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 68 / Monday, April 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules
display. The modification is required to
accommodate an added fireworks
discharge site near Liberty Island, and
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in portions of the East River,
Hudson River, and Upper New York Bay
during the duration of the Macy’s July
4 fireworks event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
May 11, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Waterways
Management Division (CGD01–05–017),
Coast Guard Activities New York, 212
Coast Guard Drive, room 203, Staten
Island, New York 10305. The
Waterways Management Division of
Coast Guard Activities New York
maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, will
become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at
room 203, Coast Guard Activities New
York, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Commander E. Morton,
Waterways Management Division, Coast
Guard Activities New York (718) 354–
4191.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD01–05–017),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to the
Waterways Management Division at the
address under ADDRESSES explaining
why one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Apr 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard proposes to revise 33
CFR 165.166, the permanent safety zone
for the annual Macy’s July 4 fireworks
displays in the East River and Upper
New York Bay. The revision is designed
to protect a third fireworks discharge
location near Liberty Island, which was
not anticipated by the original
regulation. The safety zone now
encompasses a portion of the East River
from Roosevelt Island to Governor’s
Island and is defined as all waters of the
East River east of a line drawn from the
Fireboat Station Pier, Battery Park City,
in approximate position 40°42′15.4″ N
074°01′06.8″ W (NAD 1983) to
Governors Island Light (2) (LLNR
35010), in approximate position
40°41′34.4″ N 074°01′10.9″ W (NAD
1983); north of a line drawn from
Governors Island, in approximate
position 40°41′25.3″ N 074°00′42.5″ W
(NAD 1983) to the southwest corner of
Pier 9A, Brooklyn; south of a line drawn
from East 47th Street, Manhattan
through the southern point of Roosevelt
Island to 46 Road, Brooklyn, and all
waters of Newtown Creek west of the
Pulaski Bascule Bridge. The proposed
change would increase the size of the
safety zone to include all waters of the
Upper New York Bay south of a line
drawn from Pier A (Fireboat Station
Pier), Battery Park City, in approximate
position 40°42′15.4″ N 074°01′06.8″ W
(NAD 1983) to the easternmost corner of
the Ellis Island Security Zone, in
approximate position 40°41′57.6″ N
074°02′06.7″ W (NAD 1983); and north
of a line drawn from Pier 7, Jersey City,
NJ, in approximate position 40°41′26.4″
N 074°03′17.3″ W (NAD 1983) to Liberty
Island Lighted Gong Buoy 29 (LLNR
34995), in approximate position
40°41′02.2″ N 074°02′24.7″ W (NAD
1983), on to Governor’s Island Extension
Light (LLNR 35000), in approximate
position 40°41′08.3″ N 074°01′35.4″ W
(NAD 1983).
The proposed enforcement period for
this expanded safety zone would remain
unchanged from the previous
regulation. The proposed expanded
safety zone would continue to be
enforced from 6:30 p.m. (e.s.t.) until
11:30 p.m. (e.s.t.) on July 4 each year.
If the event is cancelled due to
inclement weather, then this proposed
safety zone would be enforced from 6:30
p.m. (e.s.t.) until 11:30 p.m. (e.s.t.) on
July 5. The proposed expanded safety
zone prevents vessels from transiting
these portions of the East River, Hudson
River, and Upper New York Bay, and is
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
needed to protect mariners from the
hazards associated with fireworks
launched from 6 barges in the area. No
vessel may enter the safety zone without
permission from the Captain of the Port,
New York.
This safety zone covers the minimum
area needed and imposes the minimum
restrictions necessary to ensure the
protection of all vessels and the
fireworks handlers aboard the barges.
Public notifications will be made
prior to the event via the Local Notice
to Mariners, marine information
broadcasts, facsimile, and Macy’s
waterways telephone hotline. In
previous years this telephone hotline
has been established in early June.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed amendment to the
Macy’s July 4 fireworks display is
needed to reflect an additional fireworks
discharge location near Liberty Island.
The sponsor has indicated that the City
of Jersey City, NJ and the State of New
Jersey will continue to request this
location for future annual events. This
expanded zone was delineated on July
4, 2004 as a Coast Guard Vessel Traffic
Service (VTS) Measure, as contemplated
in 33 CFR 161.11.
No changes to the existing regulation
33 CFR 165.166, other than the
geographical expansion of the safety
zone, are proposed in this notice. This
event is held annually on July 4. If the
event is cancelled due to inclement
weather, then this event will be held on
July 5.
This rule is being proposed to provide
for the safety of life on navigable waters
during the event, to give the marine
community the opportunity to comment
on this expanded safety zone, and to
ensure that the permanent regulations
reflect the event specifications.
The proposed size of this safety zone
was determined using National Fire
Protection Association and New York
City Fire Department standards for 8 to
12 inch mortars fired from a barge,
combined with the Coast Guard’s
knowledge of tide and current
conditions in this area.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 68 / Monday, April 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
This safety zone temporarily closes a
major portion of the East River and
Upper New York Bay to vessel traffic.
There is a regular flow of traffic through
this area; however, the impact of this
regulation is expected to be minimal for
the following reasons: The limited
duration of the event; the extensive,
advance advisories that will be made to
allow the maritime community to
schedule transits before and after the
event; the event is taking place at a late
hour on a national holiday; the event
has been held for twenty-three years in
succession and is therefore anticipated
annually; small businesses may
experience an increase in revenue due
to the event; advance notifications will
be made to the local maritime
community by the Local Notice to
Mariners, marine information
broadcasts, facsimile, and the event
sponsor establishes and advertises a
telephone hotline which waterways
users may call prior to the event for
details of the safety zone. This
telephone number will be published via
the Local Notice to Mariners and
facsimile. The number is normally
activated in early June each year.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of the East River
or Upper New York Bay during the
times these zones are activated.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: The limited
duration of the event; the extensive,
advance advisories that will be made to
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:24 Apr 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
allow the maritime community to
schedule transits before and after the
event; the event is taking place at a late
hour on a national holiday; the event
has been held for twenty-three years in
succession and is therefore anticipated
annually; small businesses may
experience an increase in revenue due
to the event; advance notifications will
be made to the local maritime
community by the Local Notice to
Mariners, marine information
broadcasts, facsimile, and the event
sponsor establishes and advertises a
telephone hotline which waterways
users may call prior to the event for
details of the safety zone. This
telephone number will be published via
the Local Notice to Mariners and
facsimile. The number is normally
activated in early June each year.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Lieutenant
Commander E. Morton, Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard
Activities New York (718) 354–4191.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18345
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that may disproportionately affect
children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
18346
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 68 / Monday, April 11, 2005 / Proposed Rules
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that
this rule should be categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
34(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This
proposed rule fits paragraph 34(g) as it
increases the size of an existing safety
zone. A preliminary ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ is available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. Comments on this section
will be considered before we make the
final decision on whether the rule
should be categorically excluded from
further environmental review.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
16:24 Apr 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107–
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 165.166(a) to read as
follows:
§ 165.166 Safety Zone; Macy’s July 4th
Fireworks, East River and Upper New York
Bay, NY.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: All waters of the Upper
New York Bay south of a line drawn
from Pier A (Fireboat Station Pier),
Battery Park City, in approximate
position 40°42′15.4″ N 074°01′06.8″ W
(NAD 1983) to the easternmost corner of
the Ellis Island Security Zone, in
approximate position 40°41′57.6″ N
074°02′06.7″ W (NAD 1983); north of a
line drawn from Pier 7, Jersey City, NJ,
in approximate position 40°41′26.4″ N
074°03′17.3″ W (NAD 1983) to Liberty
Island Lighted Gong Buoy 29 (LLNR
34995), in approximate position
40°41′02.2″ N 074°02′24.7″ W (NAD
1983), on to Governor’s Island Extension
Light (LLNR 35000), in approximate
position 40°41′08.3″ N 074°01′35.4″ W
(NAD 1983); all waters of the East River
north of a line drawn from Governors
Island, in approximate position
40°41′25.3″ N 074°00′42.5″ W (NAD
1983) to the southwest corner of Pier
9A, Brooklyn; south of a line drawn
from East 47th Street, Manhattan
through the southern point of Roosevelt
Island to 46 Road, Brooklyn; and all
waters of Newtown Creek west of the
Pulaski Bascule Bridge.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 25, 2005.
Glenn A. Wiltshire,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, New York.
[FR Doc. 05–7209 Filed 4–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
VerDate jul<14>2003
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
[R06–OAR–2005–TX–0007; FRL–7896–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Texas;
Locally Enforced Idling Prohibition
Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision for the state of Texas. This
revision adds new Division 2, Locally
Enforced Motor Vehicle Idling
Limitations, in Subchapter J,
Operational Controls For Motor
Vehicles. The rule allows local
governments to voluntarily enter into an
agreement with the State to enforce
vehicle idling restrictions on vehicles
over 14,000 pounds within their
jurisdiction, with some exceptions.
Written comments must be
received on or before May 11, 2005.
DATES:
Comments may be mailed to
Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning
Section (6PD–L), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically or through hand delivery/
courier by following the detailed
instructions in the ADDRESSES section of
the direct final rule located in the rules
section of this Federal Register.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra Rennie, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733,
telephone (214) 665–7367; fax number
214–665–7263; e-mail address
rennie.sandra@epa.gov. Alternate
contact: Bill Deese (214) 665–7253,
deese.william@epa.gov.
In the
final rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this action rule,
no further activity is contemplated. If
EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM
11APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 68 (Monday, April 11, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18343-18346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7209]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD01-05-017]
RIN 2115-AA97
Safety Zone; Macy's July 4th Fireworks, East River and Upper New
York Bay, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to modify the permanent safety zone
for the annual Macy's July 4 fireworks
[[Page 18344]]
display. The modification is required to accommodate an added fireworks
discharge site near Liberty Island, and necessary to provide for the
safety of life on navigable waters during the event. This action is
intended to restrict vessel traffic in portions of the East River,
Hudson River, and Upper New York Bay during the duration of the Macy's
July 4 fireworks event.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before May 11, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Waterways
Management Division (CGD01-05-017), Coast Guard Activities New York,
212 Coast Guard Drive, room 203, Staten Island, New York 10305. The
Waterways Management Division of Coast Guard Activities New York
maintains the public docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the docket, will become part of this
docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room 203,
Coast Guard Activities New York, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander E. Morton,
Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard Activities New York (718)
354-4191.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD01-05-
017), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to the Waterways Management Division
at the address under ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial.
If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at
a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard proposes to revise 33 CFR 165.166, the permanent
safety zone for the annual Macy's July 4 fireworks displays in the East
River and Upper New York Bay. The revision is designed to protect a
third fireworks discharge location near Liberty Island, which was not
anticipated by the original regulation. The safety zone now encompasses
a portion of the East River from Roosevelt Island to Governor's Island
and is defined as all waters of the East River east of a line drawn
from the Fireboat Station Pier, Battery Park City, in approximate
position 40[deg]42'15.4'' N 074[deg]01'06.8'' W (NAD 1983) to Governors
Island Light (2) (LLNR 35010), in approximate position 40[deg]41'34.4''
N 074[deg]01'10.9'' W (NAD 1983); north of a line drawn from Governors
Island, in approximate position 40[deg]41'25.3'' N 074[deg]00'42.5'' W
(NAD 1983) to the southwest corner of Pier 9A, Brooklyn; south of a
line drawn from East 47th Street, Manhattan through the southern point
of Roosevelt Island to 46 Road, Brooklyn, and all waters of Newtown
Creek west of the Pulaski Bascule Bridge. The proposed change would
increase the size of the safety zone to include all waters of the Upper
New York Bay south of a line drawn from Pier A (Fireboat Station Pier),
Battery Park City, in approximate position 40[deg]42'15.4'' N
074[deg]01'06.8'' W (NAD 1983) to the easternmost corner of the Ellis
Island Security Zone, in approximate position 40[deg]41'57.6'' N
074[deg]02'06.7'' W (NAD 1983); and north of a line drawn from Pier 7,
Jersey City, NJ, in approximate position 40[deg]41'26.4'' N
074[deg]03'17.3'' W (NAD 1983) to Liberty Island Lighted Gong Buoy 29
(LLNR 34995), in approximate position 40[deg]41'02.2'' N
074[deg]02'24.7'' W (NAD 1983), on to Governor's Island Extension Light
(LLNR 35000), in approximate position 40[deg]41'08.3'' N
074[deg]01'35.4'' W (NAD 1983).
The proposed enforcement period for this expanded safety zone would
remain unchanged from the previous regulation. The proposed expanded
safety zone would continue to be enforced from 6:30 p.m. (e.s.t.) until
11:30 p.m. (e.s.t.) on July 4 each year. If the event is cancelled due
to inclement weather, then this proposed safety zone would be enforced
from 6:30 p.m. (e.s.t.) until 11:30 p.m. (e.s.t.) on July 5. The
proposed expanded safety zone prevents vessels from transiting these
portions of the East River, Hudson River, and Upper New York Bay, and
is needed to protect mariners from the hazards associated with
fireworks launched from 6 barges in the area. No vessel may enter the
safety zone without permission from the Captain of the Port, New York.
This safety zone covers the minimum area needed and imposes the
minimum restrictions necessary to ensure the protection of all vessels
and the fireworks handlers aboard the barges.
Public notifications will be made prior to the event via the Local
Notice to Mariners, marine information broadcasts, facsimile, and
Macy's waterways telephone hotline. In previous years this telephone
hotline has been established in early June.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed amendment to the Macy's July 4 fireworks display is
needed to reflect an additional fireworks discharge location near
Liberty Island. The sponsor has indicated that the City of Jersey City,
NJ and the State of New Jersey will continue to request this location
for future annual events. This expanded zone was delineated on July 4,
2004 as a Coast Guard Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) Measure, as
contemplated in 33 CFR 161.11.
No changes to the existing regulation 33 CFR 165.166, other than
the geographical expansion of the safety zone, are proposed in this
notice. This event is held annually on July 4. If the event is
cancelled due to inclement weather, then this event will be held on
July 5.
This rule is being proposed to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event, to give the marine community the
opportunity to comment on this expanded safety zone, and to ensure that
the permanent regulations reflect the event specifications.
The proposed size of this safety zone was determined using National
Fire Protection Association and New York City Fire Department standards
for 8 to 12 inch mortars fired from a barge, combined with the Coast
Guard's knowledge of tide and current conditions in this area.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
[[Page 18345]]
Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
This safety zone temporarily closes a major portion of the East
River and Upper New York Bay to vessel traffic. There is a regular flow
of traffic through this area; however, the impact of this regulation is
expected to be minimal for the following reasons: The limited duration
of the event; the extensive, advance advisories that will be made to
allow the maritime community to schedule transits before and after the
event; the event is taking place at a late hour on a national holiday;
the event has been held for twenty-three years in succession and is
therefore anticipated annually; small businesses may experience an
increase in revenue due to the event; advance notifications will be
made to the local maritime community by the Local Notice to Mariners,
marine information broadcasts, facsimile, and the event sponsor
establishes and advertises a telephone hotline which waterways users
may call prior to the event for details of the safety zone. This
telephone number will be published via the Local Notice to Mariners and
facsimile. The number is normally activated in early June each year.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the East River or Upper
New York Bay during the times these zones are activated.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: The
limited duration of the event; the extensive, advance advisories that
will be made to allow the maritime community to schedule transits
before and after the event; the event is taking place at a late hour on
a national holiday; the event has been held for twenty-three years in
succession and is therefore anticipated annually; small businesses may
experience an increase in revenue due to the event; advance
notifications will be made to the local maritime community by the Local
Notice to Mariners, marine information broadcasts, facsimile, and the
event sponsor establishes and advertises a telephone hotline which
waterways users may call prior to the event for details of the safety
zone. This telephone number will be published via the Local Notice to
Mariners and facsimile. The number is normally activated in early June
each year.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Lieutenant Commander E. Morton,
Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard Activities New York (718)
354-4191. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not
concern an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office
[[Page 18346]]
of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that there are no factors in this
case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should
be categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph 34(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation. This proposed
rule fits paragraph 34(g) as it increases the size of an existing
safety zone. A preliminary ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. Comments on
this section will be considered before we make the final decision on
whether the rule should be categorically excluded from further
environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise Sec. 165.166(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 165.166 Safety Zone; Macy's July 4th Fireworks, East River and
Upper New York Bay, NY.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: All waters
of the Upper New York Bay south of a line drawn from Pier A (Fireboat
Station Pier), Battery Park City, in approximate position
40[deg]42'15.4'' N 074[deg]01'06.8'' W (NAD 1983) to the easternmost
corner of the Ellis Island Security Zone, in approximate position
40[deg]41'57.6'' N 074[deg]02'06.7'' W (NAD 1983); north of a line
drawn from Pier 7, Jersey City, NJ, in approximate position
40[deg]41'26.4'' N 074[deg]03'17.3'' W (NAD 1983) to Liberty Island
Lighted Gong Buoy 29 (LLNR 34995), in approximate position
40[deg]41'02.2'' N 074[deg]02'24.7'' W (NAD 1983), on to Governor's
Island Extension Light (LLNR 35000), in approximate position
40[deg]41'08.3'' N 074[deg]01'35.4'' W (NAD 1983); all waters of the
East River north of a line drawn from Governors Island, in approximate
position 40[deg]41'25.3'' N 074[deg]00'42.5'' W (NAD 1983) to the
southwest corner of Pier 9A, Brooklyn; south of a line drawn from East
47th Street, Manhattan through the southern point of Roosevelt Island
to 46 Road, Brooklyn; and all waters of Newtown Creek west of the
Pulaski Bascule Bridge.
* * * * *
Dated: March 25, 2005.
Glenn A. Wiltshire,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, New York.
[FR Doc. 05-7209 Filed 4-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P