Anchorage Grounds; Baltimore Harbor Anchorage Project, 17898-17901 [05-6956]
Download as PDF
17898
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 67 / Friday, April 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
the final order of the Secretary and may
be enforced pursuant to § 1981.113.
§ 1981.112
Judicial review.
(a) Within 60 days after the issuance
of a final order by the Board (Secretary)
under § 1981.110, any person adversely
affected or aggrieved by the order may
file a petition for review of the order in
the United States Court of Appeals for
the circuit in which the violation
allegedly occurred or the circuit in
which the complainant resided on the
date of the violation. A final order of the
Board is not subject to judicial review
in any criminal or other civil
proceeding.
(b) If a timely petition for review is
filed, the record of a case, including the
record of proceedings before the
administrative law judge, will be
transmitted by the Board to the
appropriate court pursuant to the rules
of the court.
§ 1981.113
Judicial enforcement.
Whenever any person has failed to
comply with a preliminary order of
reinstatement or a final order or the
terms of a settlement agreement, the
Secretary or a person on whose behalf
the order was issued may file a civil
action seeking enforcement of the order
in the United States district court for the
district in which the violation was
found to have occurred.
§ 1981.114
of rules.
Special circumstances; waiver
In special circumstances not
contemplated by the provisions of this
part, or for good cause shown, the
administrative law judge or the Board
on review may, upon application, after
three days notice to all parties, waive
any rule or issue any orders that justice
or the administration of the Act
requires.
[FR Doc. 05–6925 Filed 4–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[CGD05–03–036]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorage Grounds; Baltimore Harbor
Anchorage Project
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending
the geographic coordinates and
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:11 Apr 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
modifying the regulated use of the
anchorages in Baltimore Harbor, MD.
This amendment is necessary to ensure
changes in depth and dimension to the
Baltimore Harbor anchorages resulting
from an Army Corps of Engineers
anchorage-deepening project are
reflected in the Federal regulations and
on National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Association charts. The modifications to
the regulated uses of the anchorages
accommodate changes to ships’ drafts
and lengths since the last revision of
this regulation in 1968 and standardize
the anchorage regulations throughout
the Fifth Coast Guard District.
DATES: This rule is effective May 9,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket CGD05–03–036 and are available
for inspection or copying at
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District
(oan), 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth,
VA, 23704–5004 between 9 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Junior Grade Timothy
Martin, Fifth Coast Guard District Aids
to Navigation and Waterways
Management Branch, (757) 398–6285.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
in September 2001. Dredging for the
Baltimore Harbor Anchorage was
completed in May 2003. The objective
of this project was to increase the
project depths of Anchorage No. 3 and
No. 4 to 42ft and 35ft respectively.
The original Federal anchorage
project for Baltimore Harbor was
designed to accommodate cargo ships
with maximum drafts of 33ft and
lengths of 550ft. The dimensions of the
anchorages changed to accommodate
the larger ships that call on the Port that
routinely approach 1000ft length overall
with drafts of 36 to 38 feet or more. The
new coordinates established for
Anchorage Nos. 2, 3, and 4, also
accommodate the widening of the
Dundalk West Channel, a north/south
Federal navigation project located
between Anchorage No. 3 and
Anchorage No. 4 and widening of the
Dundalk East Channel bordering
Anchorage No. 4. Anchorage No. 3 was
divided into two sections: Anchorage 3
Lower (2200′ x 2200′ x 42ft mean lower
low water (MLLW)) and Anchorage 3
Upper (1800′ x 1800′ x 42ft MLLW).
Anchorage No. 4 was also modified
(1850′ x 1800′ x 35ft MLLW).
Regulatory Information
On July 2, 2003, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Baltimore Harbor Anchorage
Project in the Federal Register (68 FR
39503). We received one phone call
commenting on the NPRM. No public
hearing was requested, and none was
held.
On January 14, 2004 we published a
supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) also entitled
Baltimore Harbor Anchorage Project in
the Federal Register (69 FR 2095) to
solicit for comments on updates made to
Anchorage 2. No public hearing was
requested, and none was held.
On October 12, 2004 we published a
supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) again entitled
Baltimore Harbor Anchorage Project in
the Federal Register (69 FR 60592) to
better align the anchorages with the
Federal navigation project. No
comments were received on the
SNPRM. No public hearing was
requested, none was held.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
One comment was received regarding
the new coordinates of the anchorages
in response to the NPRM (68 FR 39503).
Three changes where made based on
that comment. The longitude for the
fourth coordinate in Anchorage 3 Upper
listed as 76° 33′53.6″ W was changed to
76° 32′ 53.6″ W. In Anchorage 2, the
sixth position incorrectly listed as 39°
14′43.7″ N, 76° 2′63.6″ W was changed
to 39°14′43.7″ N, 76° 32′53.6″ W. Also
in Anchorage 2, the second coordinate
listed as 39° 14′43.9″ N, 76° 32′27.0″ W
was excluded.
Two changes were made to the two
northwestern coordinates in Anchorage
2 after the comment period for the
NPRM had expired. Therefore, we
issued a SNPRM to solicit comments.
No comments were received.
Minor changes were made to the
geographic points making up
Anchorages 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7 to aid in the
graphical representations of those
anchorages and better align them with
the Federal navigation project. One
decimal place was added to all
coordinates to better define the
anchorage boundaries. Therefore, we
published a second SNPRM to solicit
comments on the changes. No
comments were received.
Background and Purpose
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
received Congressional authorization for
the Baltimore Harbor Anchorage project
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 67 / Friday, April 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
The deepening of Anchorage No. 3
and Anchorage No. 4 within the Port of
Baltimore accommodates deep draft
vessels waiting for an open berth. The
Coast Guard does not expect that these
new regulations will adversely impact
maritime commerce.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels used for chartering, taxi, ferry
services, or any other marine traffic that
transit this area of Fort McHenry
Channel in Baltimore Harbor. Changes
to Anchorage No. 3 and Anchorage No.
4 may change the vessel routing through
this area of the harbor. Deepening the
anchorages and changing the
coordinates for the anchorages will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. Vessel traffic
can pass safely around the new
anchorage areas. The new coordinates
for the anchorages are a change in
dimension, the size of which will
remain proportional to its current size,
and their location will not interfere with
commercial traffic.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:11 Apr 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss possible
effects of this rule in the section titled
Small Entities in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17899
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2. of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(f), of the
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
17900
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 67 / Friday, April 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. This rule changes the
size of Anchorage No. 2, Anchorage No.
3 and Anchorage No. 4 and modifies the
regulated uses of these anchorages.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are available
in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
(3) Anchorage No. 3, Upper, general
anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line
connecting the following points:
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 24 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(4) Anchorage No. 3, Lower, general
anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line
connecting the following points:
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 110 as follows:
I
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through
1236, 2030, 2035 and 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g);
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. In § 110.158 revise paragraphs (a)
and (b) and add paragraph (c) and (d) to
read as follows:
I
§ 110.158
Baltimore Harbor, MD.
North American Datum 1983.
(a) Anchorage Grounds.
(1) Anchorage No. 1, general
anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line
connecting the following points:
Latitude
39°15′13.51″ N
39°15′11.01″ N
39°14′52.98″ N
39°14″47.90″ N
Longitude
76°34′07.76″
76°34′11.69″
76°33′52.67″
76°33′40.73″
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
W
W
W
Longitude
76°33′25.82″ W
76°33′37.15″ W
76°33′37.65″ W
76°33′24.49″ W
76°33′14.32″ W
76°32′57.76″ W
76°32′45.48″ W
76°32′27.38′ W
76°32′33.52″ W
76°32′49.69″ W
76°32′53.62″ W
76°33′08.13″ W
15:11 Apr 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
76°33′11.31″
76°33′25.82″
76°33′08.13″
76°32′53.62″
Longitude
76°33′11.31″
76°32′49.69″
76°32′33.52″
76°32′39.87″
76°32′53.58″
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(5) Anchorage No. 4, general
anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line
connecting the following points:
N
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
76°32′29.60″
76°32′43.30″
76°32′43.12″
76°32′26.41″
76°32′13.09″
76°32′17.77″
W
W
W
W
W
W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(6) Anchorage No. 5, general
anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line
connecting the following points:
Latitude
39°14′07.89″
39°13′34.82″
39°13′22.25″
39°13′21.20″
N
N
N
N
Longitude
76°32′58.23″
76°32′23.66″
76°32′28.90″
76°33′11.94″
W
W
W
W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(7) Anchorage No. 6, general
anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line
connecting the following points:
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
VerDate jul<14>2003
Latitude
39°14′32.48″
39°14′46.27″
39°14′30.93″
39°14′24.40″
39°14′15.66″
Latitude
39°13′52.91″
39°14′05.91″
39°14′07.30″
39°14′17.96″
39°14′05.32″
39°14′00.46″
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 12 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(2) Anchorage No. 2, general
anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line
connecting the following points:
Latitude
39°14′46.23″
39°14′56.96″
39°15′08.55″
39°15′19.28″
39°15′19.33″
39°15′14.19″
39°15′06.87″
39°14′41.37″
39°14′30.93″
39°14′46.27″
39°14′43.76″
39°14′57.51″
Latitude
39°14′32.48″
39°14′46.23″
39°14′57.51″
39°14′43.76″
Latitude
39°13′42.98″
39°13′20.65″
39°13′34.00″
39°14′01.95″
PO 00000
Frm 00012
N
N
N
N
Fmt 4700
Longitude
76°32′19.11″
76°31′55.58″
76°31′33.50″
76°32′02.65″
Sfmt 4700
W
W
W
W
39°13′51.01″ N
76°32′18.71″ W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this
anchorage for more than 72 hours
without permission from the Captain of
the Port.
(8) Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship
anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line
connecting the following points:
Latitude
39°13′00.40″
39°13′13.40″
39°13′13.96″
39°13′14.83″
39°13′00.40″
N
N
N
N
N
Longitude
76°34′10.40″
76°34′10.81″
76°34′05.02″
76°33′29.80″
76°33′29.90″
W
W
W
W
W
(ii) The primary use of this anchorage
is to lay up dead ships. Such use has
priority over other uses. Permission
from the Captain of the Port must be
obtained prior to the use of this
anchorage for more than 72 hours.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section: Class 1 (explosive) materials
means Division 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4
explosives, as defined in 49 CFR 173.50.
Dangerous cargo means certain
dangerous cargo as defined in Sec.
160.203 of this title.
(c) General regulations. (1) Except as
otherwise provided, this section applies
to vessels over 20 meters long and all
vessels carrying or handling dangerous
cargo or Class 1 (explosive) materials
while anchored in an anchorage ground
described in this section.
(2) Except in cases where unforeseen
circumstances create conditions of
imminent peril, or with the permission
of the Captain of the Port, no vessel
shall be anchored in Baltimore Harbor
and Patapsco River outside of the
anchorage areas established in this
section for more than 24 hours. No
vessel shall anchor within a tunnel,
cable or pipeline area shown on a
government chart. No vessel shall be
moored, anchored, or tied up to any
pier, wharf, or other vessel in such
manner as to extend into established
channel limits. No vessel shall be
positioned so as to obstruct or endanger
the passage of any other vessel.
(3) Except in an emergency, a vessel
that is likely to sink or otherwise
become a menace or obstruction to
navigation or the anchoring of other
vessels may not occupy an anchorage,
unless the vessel obtains a permit from
the Captain of the Port.
(4) The Captain of the Port may grant
a revocable permit to a vessel for a
habitual use of an anchorage. Only the
vessel that holds the revocable permit
may use the anchorage during the
period that the permit is in effect.
(5) Upon notification by the Captain
of the Port to shift its position, a vessel
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 67 / Friday, April 8, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
at anchor shall get underway and shall
move to its new designated position
within 2 hours after notification.
(6) The Captain of the Port may
prescribe specific conditions for vessels
anchoring within the anchorages
described in this section, including, but
not limited to, the number and location
of anchors, scope of chain, readiness of
engineering plant and equipment, usage
of tugs, and requirements for
maintaining communication guards on
selected radio frequencies.
(7) No vessel at anchor or at a mooring
within an anchorage may transfer oil to
or from another vessel unless the vessel
has given the Captain of the Port the
four hours advance notice required by
§ 156.118 of this chapter.
(8) No vessel shall anchor in a ‘‘dead
ship’’ status (propulsion or control
unavailable for normal operations)
without prior approval of the Captain of
the Port.
(d) Regulations for vessels handling or
carrying dangerous cargoes or Class 1
(explosive) materials. (1) This paragraph
(d) applies to every vessel, except a U.S.
naval vessel, handling or carrying
dangerous cargoes or Class 1 (explosive)
materials.
(2) The Captain of the Port may
require every person having business
aboard a vessel handling or carrying
dangerous cargoes or Class 1 (explosive)
materials while in an anchorage, other
than a member of the crew, to hold a
form of identification prescribed in the
vessel’s security plan.
(3) Each person having business
aboard a vessel handling or carrying
dangerous cargoes or Class 1 (explosive)
materials while in an anchorage, other
than a member of the crew, shall present
the identification prescribed by
paragraph (d)(2) of this section to any
Coast Guard Boarding Officer who
requests it.
(4) Each non-self-propelled vessel
handling or carrying dangerous cargoes
or Class 1 (explosive) materials must
have a tug in attendance at all times
while at anchor.
(5) Each vessel handling or carrying
dangerous cargoes or Class 1 (explosive)
materials while at anchor must display
by day a bravo flag in a prominent
location and by night a fixed red light.
Dated: March 25, 2005.
Ben Thomason, III,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–6956 Filed 4–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:37 Apr 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP–2004–0412; FRL–7691–8]
Buprofezin; Pesticide Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of buprofezin in
or on avocado, papaya, star apple, black
sapote, mango, sapodilla, canistel,
mamey sapote, sugar apple, cherimoya,
atemoya, custard apple, ilama, soursop,
birida, guava, feijoa, jaboticaba, wax
jambu, starfruit, passionfruit, and
acerola at 0.30 parts per million (ppm);
pome fruit at 0.30 ppm; peach at 9.0
ppm, meat (cattle, goat, hog, horse, and
sheep) at 0.05 ppm; kidney (cattle, goat,
hog, horse, and sheep) at 0.05 ppm.;
lettuce, head at 5.0 ppm, Lettuce, leaf at
13.0 ppm, and Vegetable, cucurbit at 0.5
ppm; fruit, citrus, group 10 at 2.5 ppm;
citrus, dried, pulp at 7.5 ppm; and
citrus, oil at 80 ppm. Nichino America,
Inc., Linden Park, Suite 501, 4550 New
Linden Hill Road, Wilmington, DE
19808 requested these tolerances under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food
Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA).
DATES: This regulation is effective April
8, 2005. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
June 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: To submit a written
objection or hearing request follow the
detailed instructions as provided in
Unit VI. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
identification (ID) number OPP–2004–
0412. All documents in the docket are
listed in the EDOCKET index at
https://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
copy at the Public Information and
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm.
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA. This docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17901
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard J. Gebken, Registration Division
(7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–6701; e-mail address:
gebken.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS 111), e.g.,
agricultural workers; greenhouse,
nursery, and floriculture workers;
farmers.
• Animal production (NAICS 112),
e.g., cattle ranchers and farmers, dairy
cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
• Food manufacturing (NAICS 311),
e.g., agricultural workers; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; ranchers; pesticide applicators.
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
32532), e.g., agricultural workers;
commercial applicators; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; residential users.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document and Other Related
Information?
In addition to using EDOCKET
(https://www.epa.gov/edocket/), you may
access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A
frequently updated electronic version of
40 CFR part 180 is available at E-CFR
Beta Site Two at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of March 17,
2004 (69 FR 12676) (FRL–7347–1), EPA
issued a notice pursuant to section
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 67 (Friday, April 8, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17898-17901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6956]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[CGD05-03-036]
RIN 1625-AA01
Anchorage Grounds; Baltimore Harbor Anchorage Project
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending the geographic coordinates and
modifying the regulated use of the anchorages in Baltimore Harbor, MD.
This amendment is necessary to ensure changes in depth and dimension to
the Baltimore Harbor anchorages resulting from an Army Corps of
Engineers anchorage-deepening project are reflected in the Federal
regulations and on National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association charts.
The modifications to the regulated uses of the anchorages accommodate
changes to ships' drafts and lengths since the last revision of this
regulation in 1968 and standardize the anchorage regulations throughout
the Fifth Coast Guard District.
DATES: This rule is effective May 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket CGD05-03-036 and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District (oan), 431 Crawford
Street, Portsmouth, VA, 23704-5004 between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Junior Grade Timothy
Martin, Fifth Coast Guard District Aids to Navigation and Waterways
Management Branch, (757) 398-6285.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On July 2, 2003, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Baltimore Harbor Anchorage Project in the Federal
Register (68 FR 39503). We received one phone call commenting on the
NPRM. No public hearing was requested, and none was held.
On January 14, 2004 we published a supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) also entitled Baltimore Harbor Anchorage Project in
the Federal Register (69 FR 2095) to solicit for comments on updates
made to Anchorage 2. No public hearing was requested, and none was
held.
On October 12, 2004 we published a supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) again entitled Baltimore Harbor Anchorage Project in
the Federal Register (69 FR 60592) to better align the anchorages with
the Federal navigation project. No comments were received on the SNPRM.
No public hearing was requested, none was held.
Background and Purpose
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers received Congressional
authorization for the Baltimore Harbor Anchorage project in September
2001. Dredging for the Baltimore Harbor Anchorage was completed in May
2003. The objective of this project was to increase the project depths
of Anchorage No. 3 and No. 4 to 42ft and 35ft respectively.
The original Federal anchorage project for Baltimore Harbor was
designed to accommodate cargo ships with maximum drafts of 33ft and
lengths of 550ft. The dimensions of the anchorages changed to
accommodate the larger ships that call on the Port that routinely
approach 1000ft length overall with drafts of 36 to 38 feet or more.
The new coordinates established for Anchorage Nos. 2, 3, and 4, also
accommodate the widening of the Dundalk West Channel, a north/south
Federal navigation project located between Anchorage No. 3 and
Anchorage No. 4 and widening of the Dundalk East Channel bordering
Anchorage No. 4. Anchorage No. 3 was divided into two sections:
Anchorage 3 Lower (2200' x 2200' x 42ft mean lower low water (MLLW))
and Anchorage 3 Upper (1800' x 1800' x 42ft MLLW). Anchorage No. 4 was
also modified (1850' x 1800' x 35ft MLLW).
Discussion of Comments and Changes
One comment was received regarding the new coordinates of the
anchorages in response to the NPRM (68 FR 39503). Three changes where
made based on that comment. The longitude for the fourth coordinate in
Anchorage 3 Upper listed as 76[deg] 33'53.6'' W was changed to 76[deg]
32' 53.6'' W. In Anchorage 2, the sixth position incorrectly listed as
39[deg] 14'43.7'' N, 76[deg] 2'63.6'' W was changed to 39[deg]14'43.7''
N, 76[deg] 32'53.6'' W. Also in Anchorage 2, the second coordinate
listed as 39[deg] 14'43.9'' N, 76[deg] 32'27.0'' W was excluded.
Two changes were made to the two northwestern coordinates in
Anchorage 2 after the comment period for the NPRM had expired.
Therefore, we issued a SNPRM to solicit comments. No comments were
received.
Minor changes were made to the geographic points making up
Anchorages 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7 to aid in the graphical representations of
those anchorages and better align them with the Federal navigation
project. One decimal place was added to all coordinates to better
define the anchorage boundaries. Therefore, we published a second SNPRM
to solicit comments on the changes. No comments were received.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
[[Page 17899]]
Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of
Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
The deepening of Anchorage No. 3 and Anchorage No. 4 within the
Port of Baltimore accommodates deep draft vessels waiting for an open
berth. The Coast Guard does not expect that these new regulations will
adversely impact maritime commerce.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels used for
chartering, taxi, ferry services, or any other marine traffic that
transit this area of Fort McHenry Channel in Baltimore Harbor. Changes
to Anchorage No. 3 and Anchorage No. 4 may change the vessel routing
through this area of the harbor. Deepening the anchorages and changing
the coordinates for the anchorages will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons. Vessel traffic can pass safely around the new anchorage areas.
The new coordinates for the anchorages are a change in dimension, the
size of which will remain proportional to its current size, and their
location will not interfere with commercial traffic.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss possible effects of this rule in the section titled Small
Entities in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2. of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(f), of the
[[Page 17900]]
Instruction, from further environmental documentation. This rule
changes the size of Anchorage No. 2, Anchorage No. 3 and Anchorage No.
4 and modifies the regulated uses of these anchorages.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2030, 2035 and
2071; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. In Sec. 110.158 revise paragraphs (a) and (b) and add paragraph (c)
and (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 110.158 Baltimore Harbor, MD.
North American Datum 1983.
(a) Anchorage Grounds.
(1) Anchorage No. 1, general anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]15'13.51'' N 76[deg]34'07.76'' W
39[deg]15'11.01'' N 76[deg]34'11.69'' W
39[deg]14'52.98'' N 76[deg]33'52.67'' W
39[deg]14''47.90'' N 76[deg]33'40.73'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 12
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(2) Anchorage No. 2, general anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]14'46.23'' N 76[deg]33'25.82'' W
39[deg]14'56.96'' N 76[deg]33'37.15'' W
39[deg]15'08.55'' N 76[deg]33'37.65'' W
39[deg]15'19.28'' N 76[deg]33'24.49'' W
39[deg]15'19.33'' N 76[deg]33'14.32'' W
39[deg]15'14.19'' N 76[deg]32'57.76'' W
39[deg]15'06.87'' N 76[deg]32'45.48'' W
39[deg]14'41.37'' N 76[deg]32'27.38' W
39[deg]14'30.93'' N 76[deg]32'33.52'' W
39[deg]14'46.27'' N 76[deg]32'49.69'' W
39[deg]14'43.76'' N 76[deg]32'53.62'' W
39[deg]14'57.51'' N 76[deg]33'08.13'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(3) Anchorage No. 3, Upper, general anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]14'32.48'' N 76[deg]33'11.31'' W
39[deg]14'46.23'' N 76[deg]33'25.82'' W
39[deg]14'57.51'' N 76[deg]33'08.13'' W
39[deg]14'43.76'' N 76[deg]32'53.62'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 24
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(4) Anchorage No. 3, Lower, general anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]14'32.48'' N 76[deg]33'11.31'' W
39[deg]14'46.27'' N 76[deg]32'49.69'' W
39[deg]14'30.93'' N 76[deg]32'33.52'' W
39[deg]14'24.40'' N 76[deg]32'39.87'' W
39[deg]14'15.66'' N 76[deg]32'53.58'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(5) Anchorage No. 4, general anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]13'52.91'' N 76[deg]32'29.60'' W
39[deg]14'05.91'' N 76[deg]32'43.30'' W
39[deg]14'07.30'' N 76[deg]32'43.12'' W
39[deg]14'17.96'' N 76[deg]32'26.41'' W
39[deg]14'05.32'' N 76[deg]32'13.09'' W
39[deg]14'00.46'' N 76[deg]32'17.77'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(6) Anchorage No. 5, general anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]14'07.89'' N 76[deg]32'58.23'' W
39[deg]13'34.82'' N 76[deg]32'23.66'' W
39[deg]13'22.25'' N 76[deg]32'28.90'' W
39[deg]13'21.20'' N 76[deg]33'11.94'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(7) Anchorage No. 6, general anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]13'42.98'' N 76[deg]32'19.11'' W
39[deg]13'20.65'' N 76[deg]31'55.58'' W
39[deg]13'34.00'' N 76[deg]31'33.50'' W
39[deg]14'01.95'' N 76[deg]32'02.65'' W
39[deg]13'51.01'' N 76[deg]32'18.71'' W
(ii) No vessel shall remain in this anchorage for more than 72
hours without permission from the Captain of the Port.
(8) Anchorage No. 7, Dead ship anchorage.
(i) The waters bounded by a line connecting the following points:
Latitude Longitude
39[deg]13'00.40'' N 76[deg]34'10.40'' W
39[deg]13'13.40'' N 76[deg]34'10.81'' W
39[deg]13'13.96'' N 76[deg]34'05.02'' W
39[deg]13'14.83'' N 76[deg]33'29.80'' W
39[deg]13'00.40'' N 76[deg]33'29.90'' W
(ii) The primary use of this anchorage is to lay up dead ships.
Such use has priority over other uses. Permission from the Captain of
the Port must be obtained prior to the use of this anchorage for more
than 72 hours.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section: Class 1 (explosive)
materials means Division 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4 explosives, as defined
in 49 CFR 173.50. Dangerous cargo means certain dangerous cargo as
defined in Sec. 160.203 of this title.
(c) General regulations. (1) Except as otherwise provided, this
section applies to vessels over 20 meters long and all vessels carrying
or handling dangerous cargo or Class 1 (explosive) materials while
anchored in an anchorage ground described in this section.
(2) Except in cases where unforeseen circumstances create
conditions of imminent peril, or with the permission of the Captain of
the Port, no vessel shall be anchored in Baltimore Harbor and Patapsco
River outside of the anchorage areas established in this section for
more than 24 hours. No vessel shall anchor within a tunnel, cable or
pipeline area shown on a government chart. No vessel shall be moored,
anchored, or tied up to any pier, wharf, or other vessel in such manner
as to extend into established channel limits. No vessel shall be
positioned so as to obstruct or endanger the passage of any other
vessel.
(3) Except in an emergency, a vessel that is likely to sink or
otherwise become a menace or obstruction to navigation or the anchoring
of other vessels may not occupy an anchorage, unless the vessel obtains
a permit from the Captain of the Port.
(4) The Captain of the Port may grant a revocable permit to a
vessel for a habitual use of an anchorage. Only the vessel that holds
the revocable permit may use the anchorage during the period that the
permit is in effect.
(5) Upon notification by the Captain of the Port to shift its
position, a vessel
[[Page 17901]]
at anchor shall get underway and shall move to its new designated
position within 2 hours after notification.
(6) The Captain of the Port may prescribe specific conditions for
vessels anchoring within the anchorages described in this section,
including, but not limited to, the number and location of anchors,
scope of chain, readiness of engineering plant and equipment, usage of
tugs, and requirements for maintaining communication guards on selected
radio frequencies.
(7) No vessel at anchor or at a mooring within an anchorage may
transfer oil to or from another vessel unless the vessel has given the
Captain of the Port the four hours advance notice required by Sec.
156.118 of this chapter.
(8) No vessel shall anchor in a ``dead ship'' status (propulsion or
control unavailable for normal operations) without prior approval of
the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations for vessels handling or carrying dangerous cargoes
or Class 1 (explosive) materials. (1) This paragraph (d) applies to
every vessel, except a U.S. naval vessel, handling or carrying
dangerous cargoes or Class 1 (explosive) materials.
(2) The Captain of the Port may require every person having
business aboard a vessel handling or carrying dangerous cargoes or
Class 1 (explosive) materials while in an anchorage, other than a
member of the crew, to hold a form of identification prescribed in the
vessel's security plan.
(3) Each person having business aboard a vessel handling or
carrying dangerous cargoes or Class 1 (explosive) materials while in an
anchorage, other than a member of the crew, shall present the
identification prescribed by paragraph (d)(2) of this section to any
Coast Guard Boarding Officer who requests it.
(4) Each non-self-propelled vessel handling or carrying dangerous
cargoes or Class 1 (explosive) materials must have a tug in attendance
at all times while at anchor.
(5) Each vessel handling or carrying dangerous cargoes or Class 1
(explosive) materials while at anchor must display by day a bravo flag
in a prominent location and by night a fixed red light.
Dated: March 25, 2005.
Ben Thomason, III,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 05-6956 Filed 4-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P