Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision, 16885-16886 [05-6473]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices Transportation and Highway Safety approved a new National Safety Code Standard for cargo securement. The new Canadian securement requirements are expected to be fully implemented by this summer, 2005. Maintaining Uniformity Between U.S. and Canadian Cargo Securement Standards FMCSA believes it is necessary to continue working with U.S. and Canadian industry experts, Federal, State, and Provincial enforcement officials and other interested parties to maintain harmonization of U.S. and Canadian cargo securement standards. A major part of this effort includes uniformity in interpreting the meaning of requirements adopted by the U.S. and Canada. While there are some differences between certain provisions adopted by FMCSA and Canada’s National Safety Code Standard 10, the contents of most of the Model Regulations have been adopted, or will be adopted shortly, by almost all jurisdictions in the U.S. and Canada. To ensure consistency in the interpretation and enforcement of the requirements, FMCSA is working with its Canadian partners to develop a process for sharing information about requests for interpretation, and exchanging technical information that will be helpful to the regulatory agencies in developing their responses to such requests. FMCSA will continue to work with its Canadian partners to ensure that interpretations are provided in an efficient and timely manner to all interested parties. As a first step, FMCSA is holding a public meeting to provide all interested parties an opportunity to participate in discussions between the agency and its Canadian counterparts about interpretations and other implementation issues. Additional Meeting Information The meeting is on April 21–22, 2005, at the Albuquerque Convention Center (Enchantment 1 Room), 401 Second Street NW., Albuquerque, New Mexico. On April 21, the meeting is from 1 to 5 p.m.; and on April 22, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. This meeting is free of charge and open to all interested parties. The public meeting is being held immediately after the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance’s (CVSA’s) 2005 Annual Conference ends. If you are interested in attending CVSA’s conference sessions and committee meetings, you must register with CVSA and pay the appropriate registration fee. For further information about registering, you should contact CVSA at (202) 775–1623. VerDate jul<14>2003 17:15 Mar 31, 2005 Jkt 205001 Issued on: March 28, 2005. Annette M. Sandberg, Administrator. [FR Doc. 05–6488 Filed 3–31–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of denials. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The FMCSA announces its denial of 102 applications from individuals who requested an exemption from the Federal vision standard applicable to interstate truck drivers and the reasons for the denials. The FMCSA has statutory authority to exempt individuals from the vision standard if the exemptions granted will not compromise safety. The agency has concluded that granting these exemptions does not provide a level of safety that will equal or exceed the level of safety maintained without the exemptions for these commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and Operations, (MC– PSD) 202–366–4001, Department of Transportation, FMCSA, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590– 0001. Office hours are 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), FMCSA may grant an exemption from the Federal vision standard for a twoyear period if it finds such an exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent such an exemption (49 CFR 381.305(a)). Accordingly, FMCSA evaluated 102 individual exemption requests on their merits and made a determination that these applicants do not satisfy the criteria established to demonstrate that granting an exemption is likely to achieve an equal or greater level of safety than exists without the exemption. Each applicant has, prior to this notice, received a letter of final disposition on his/her exemption request. Those decision letters fully outlined the basis for the denial and PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 16885 constitute final agency action. The list published today summarizes the agency’s recent denials as required under 49 U.S.C. § 31315(b)(4) by periodically publishing names and reasons for denials. The following 52 applicants lacked sufficient recent driving experience during the three-year period prior to the date of their application: Adkins, William I. Alejandro, Pablo Archambault, Gary E. Ash, Frederick J. Barber, Jr., Lonnie D. Bors, Allen G. Brooks, Marvin L. Burlitch, Donald L. Cleveland, Nathan P. Collins, Gary L. Cooper, Gregory L. Culverwell, Gerald L. Delain, Lash L. Dozier, Clifton Durer, James F. Else, Gerald G. Fischer, Matthew A. Frampton, James A. Gilleland, David J. Gravely, Donald G. Graves, Thomas Haas, Kenneth L. Hamilton, Jeffery A. Hill, Ray C. Hummel, Patrick B. Jackman, Norman Johnson, James L. Kelly, Danny J. Kopeshke, Edward M. Kuhr, Howard G. Lana, Carmelo Langford, William D. Leven, Hugh Logue, William H. Lohrbach, Carl A. May, Timothy G. Merritt, Russell S. Nickel V, William F. Pitta, Jr., Joe Polen, Floyd L. Provencher, Edwin J. Roslansky, Daniel F. Rushing, Rodger D. Schmitt, Stephen E. Silver, Sylvester Smith, Jr., Eddie J. Smith, James A. Tapp, Carolyn O. Towner, John C. Turner, Glen V. Wright, Forrest L. Zoeller, David D. The following seven applicants do not have experience operating a CMV and presented no evidence from which FMCSA can conclude that granting the exemption is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption: E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM 01APN1 16886 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices Chiakas, Randall Jones, Nathan B. Loum, Mamadou Mankowski, Joseph P. Reid, Mark A. Skwarek, James M. Stewart, James C. The following nine applicants do not have three years of experience driving a CMV on public highways with the vision deficiency: Atwood, Jr., Ronald S. Church, Roy D. Hopkins, Ricky A. Little, Edward C. Marshall, Judy L. Perry, Gregory L. Peters, Carl H. Ross, Edward Kou, Xiong The following five applicants do not have three years of recent experience driving a CMV with the vision deficiency. Armstrong, Karl G. Hagen, Brian G. Pugh, Timothy R. Rodriguez, Angel L. Slate, William K. One applicant, Shefiu O. Abdulsalam, meets the vision requirements and does not need a vision exemption. One applicant, Quinn C. Wheaton, does not have sufficient peripheral vision in the better eye to qualify for an exemption. Five applicants had their commercial driver’s licenses suspended during the three-year review period in relation to a moving violation. Applicants do not qualify for an exemption with a suspension during the three-year review period. Bayer, Jeffery Rankin, Richard O. White, Stephen R. Willis, J. C. Woodworth, Daniel D. Fourteen applicants contributed to a crash while operating a CMV. Applicants do not qualify for an exemption if they have contributed to a crash during the three-year review period. Brooks, John P. Cromwell, Jerry G. Dunaway, Roger M. Hahn, George L. Harley, Jeff D. Harris, Bobby L. Hummel, Timothy B. Peculis, Brian Pitts, Sr., Jeffery A. Reed, Sr., Franklin D. Robbins, Frederick G. Shaw, Ricky D. Smith, Raymond C. VerDate jul<14>2003 17:15 Mar 31, 2005 Jkt 205001 Wesley, Loyal R. One applicant, Timothy L. Kelly, was issued excessive nonmoving violations during the three-year period, and did not demonstrate the level of safety required for interstate driving. Four applicants did not hold a license that allowed operation of the vehicles that they drove during the three-year review period. Garcia, Larry G. McQuilty, Duane A. Shamblin, Hoyt M. Waiters, Clifton One applicant, John Bruins, was denied because his license was suspended for ‘‘refusing to submit to test.’’ One applicant, Donnie R. Hovis, was denied because he did not hold a license that allowed operation of vehicles over 10,000 pounds for all or part of the three-year period, and was involved in a CMV crash to which he contributed. Both are disqualifying offenses. Finally, one applicant, James W. Currie, did not have stable vision during the three-year review period. Issued on: March 28, 2005. Rose A. McMurray, Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development. [FR Doc. 05–6473 Filed 3–31–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket Nos. FMCSA–98–4334, FMCSA– 2003–14223] Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of renewal of exemption; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This notice publishes the FMCSA decision to renew the exemptions from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for 13 individuals. FMCSA has statutory authority to exempt individuals from vision standards if the exemptions granted will not compromise safety. The agency has concluded that granting these exemptions will provide a level of safety that will be equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety maintained without the exemptions for these commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers. PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 This decision is effective April 21, 2005. Comments from interested persons should be submitted by May 2, 2005. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT DMS Docket Numbers FMCSA–98–4334 and FMCSA–2003–14223 by any of the following methods: • Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site. • Fax: 1–202–493–2251. • Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590– 0001. • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and docket numbers for this notice. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public Participation heading of the Supplementary Information section of this document. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to https://dms.dot.gov, including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading under Regulatory Notices. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to https:// dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL– 401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary D. Gunnels, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and Operations, (202) 366–4001, FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590–0001. Office hours are from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Participation: The DMS is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. You can get electronic submission and retrieval help guidelines under the ‘‘help’’ section of the DMS web site. If you want us to notify you that we DATES: E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM 01APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 62 (Friday, April 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16885-16886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of denials.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FMCSA announces its denial of 102 applications from 
individuals who requested an exemption from the Federal vision standard 
applicable to interstate truck drivers and the reasons for the denials. 
The FMCSA has statutory authority to exempt individuals from the vision 
standard if the exemptions granted will not compromise safety. The 
agency has concluded that granting these exemptions does not provide a 
level of safety that will equal or exceed the level of safety 
maintained without the exemptions for these commercial motor vehicle 
(CMV) drivers.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Office of Bus and 
Truck Standards and Operations, (MC-PSD) 202-366-4001, Department of 
Transportation, FMCSA, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-
0001. Office hours are 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. e.t., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), FMCSA may grant an exemption 
from the Federal vision standard for a two-year period if it finds such 
an exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent 
to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent such an 
exemption (49 CFR 381.305(a)).
    Accordingly, FMCSA evaluated 102 individual exemption requests on 
their merits and made a determination that these applicants do not 
satisfy the criteria established to demonstrate that granting an 
exemption is likely to achieve an equal or greater level of safety than 
exists without the exemption. Each applicant has, prior to this notice, 
received a letter of final disposition on his/her exemption request. 
Those decision letters fully outlined the basis for the denial and 
constitute final agency action. The list published today summarizes the 
agency's recent denials as required under 49 U.S.C. Sec.  31315(b)(4) 
by periodically publishing names and reasons for denials.
    The following 52 applicants lacked sufficient recent driving 
experience during the three-year period prior to the date of their 
application:

Adkins, William I.
Alejandro, Pablo
Archambault, Gary E.
Ash, Frederick J.
Barber, Jr., Lonnie D.
Bors, Allen G.
Brooks, Marvin L.
Burlitch, Donald L.
Cleveland, Nathan P.
Collins, Gary L.
Cooper, Gregory L.
Culverwell, Gerald L.
Delain, Lash L.
Dozier, Clifton
Durer, James F.
Else, Gerald G.
Fischer, Matthew A.
Frampton, James A.
Gilleland, David J.
Gravely, Donald G.
Graves, Thomas
Haas, Kenneth L.
Hamilton, Jeffery A.
Hill, Ray C.
Hummel, Patrick B.
Jackman, Norman
Johnson, James L.
Kelly, Danny J.
Kopeshke, Edward M.
Kuhr, Howard G.
Lana, Carmelo
Langford, William D.
Leven, Hugh
Logue, William H.
Lohrbach, Carl A.
May, Timothy G.
Merritt, Russell S.
Nickel V, William F.
Pitta, Jr., Joe
Polen, Floyd L.
Provencher, Edwin J.
Roslansky, Daniel F.
Rushing, Rodger D.
Schmitt, Stephen E.
Silver, Sylvester
Smith, Jr., Eddie J.
Smith, James A.
Tapp, Carolyn O.
Towner, John C.
Turner, Glen V.
Wright, Forrest L.
Zoeller, David D.

    The following seven applicants do not have experience operating a 
CMV and presented no evidence from which FMCSA can conclude that 
granting the exemption is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to 
that existing without the exemption:


[[Page 16886]]


Chiakas, Randall
Jones, Nathan B.
Loum, Mamadou
Mankowski, Joseph P.
Reid, Mark A.
Skwarek, James M.
Stewart, James C.

    The following nine applicants do not have three years of experience 
driving a CMV on public highways with the vision deficiency:

Atwood, Jr., Ronald S.
Church, Roy D.
Hopkins, Ricky A.
Little, Edward C.
Marshall, Judy L.
Perry, Gregory L.
Peters, Carl H.
Ross, Edward
Kou, Xiong

    The following five applicants do not have three years of recent 
experience driving a CMV with the vision deficiency.

Armstrong, Karl G.
Hagen, Brian G.
Pugh, Timothy R.
Rodriguez, Angel L.
Slate, William K.

    One applicant, Shefiu O. Abdulsalam, meets the vision requirements 
and does not need a vision exemption.
    One applicant, Quinn C. Wheaton, does not have sufficient 
peripheral vision in the better eye to qualify for an exemption.
    Five applicants had their commercial driver's licenses suspended 
during the three-year review period in relation to a moving violation. 
Applicants do not qualify for an exemption with a suspension during the 
three-year review period.

Bayer, Jeffery
Rankin, Richard O.
White, Stephen R.
Willis, J. C.
Woodworth, Daniel D.

    Fourteen applicants contributed to a crash while operating a CMV. 
Applicants do not qualify for an exemption if they have contributed to 
a crash during the three-year review period.

Brooks, John P.
Cromwell, Jerry G.
Dunaway, Roger M.
Hahn, George L.
Harley, Jeff D.
Harris, Bobby L.
Hummel, Timothy B.
Peculis, Brian
Pitts, Sr., Jeffery A.
Reed, Sr., Franklin D.
Robbins, Frederick G.
Shaw, Ricky D.
Smith, Raymond C.
Wesley, Loyal R.

    One applicant, Timothy L. Kelly, was issued excessive nonmoving 
violations during the three-year period, and did not demonstrate the 
level of safety required for interstate driving.
    Four applicants did not hold a license that allowed operation of 
the vehicles that they drove during the three-year review period.

Garcia, Larry G.
McQuilty, Duane A.
Shamblin, Hoyt M.
Waiters, Clifton

    One applicant, John Bruins, was denied because his license was 
suspended for ``refusing to submit to test.''
    One applicant, Donnie R. Hovis, was denied because he did not hold 
a license that allowed operation of vehicles over 10,000 pounds for all 
or part of the three-year period, and was involved in a CMV crash to 
which he contributed. Both are disqualifying offenses.
    Finally, one applicant, James W. Currie, did not have stable vision 
during the three-year review period.

    Issued on: March 28, 2005.
Rose A. McMurray,
Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 05-6473 Filed 3-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.