Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities; Final Rule; Correction, 16724-16729 [05-6379]
Download as PDF
16724
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
3. In Addendum B, the following
HCPCS codes are included to read as
follows:
We ordinarily publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register to provide a period for public
comment prior to publication of a final
notice. We can waive this procedure,
however, if we find good cause that
notice and comment procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest and incorporate a
statement of the finding and the reasons
for it into the notice issued. In
accordance with section 903 of the
MMA, failure to retroactively apply the
corrections would be contrary to the
public interest.
We find it unnecessary to undertake
notice and comment rulemaking
because this notice merely provides
technical corrections to the regulations.
Therefore, we find good cause to waive
notice and comment procedures.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.774, Medicare—
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: March 16, 2005.
Ann C. Agnew,
Executive Secretary to the Department.
[FR Doc. 05–6131 Filed 3–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–C
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Parts 412 and 413
[CMS–1213–CN]
RIN 0938–AL50
Medicare Program; Prospective
Payment System for Inpatient
Psychiatric Facilities; Final Rule;
Correction
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Correction of final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document corrects errors
that appeared in the final rule published
in the Federal Register on November 15,
2004, entitled ‘‘Medicare Program;
Prospective Payment System for
Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities.’’ This
document also supplements the
November 15, 2004 final rule.
DATES: Effective January 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janet Samen, (410) 786–9161.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In FR Doc. 04–24787 of November 15,
2004 (69 FR 66922), there were several
errors that are identified in the
‘‘Summary of Errors’’ section and
corrected in the ‘‘Correction of Errors’’
section below. In addition to clarifying
ambiguities and correcting
typographical errors and incorrect
references, this document is a
supplement to the document published
on November 15, 2004, entitled
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘Medicare Program; Prospective
Payment System for Inpatient
Psychiatric Facilities’’ (hereinafter
referred to as the IPF PPS final rule or
final rule) because it includes a timely
submitted comment and our response
that we inadvertently failed to include
in the final rule. The provisions of this
correction notice are effective as if they
had been included in the final rule.
Accordingly, the corrections are
effective January 1, 2005.
II. Summary of Errors
In the November 15, 2004 final rule,
in payment calculation examples, we
stated that we computed a wage
adjustment factor for each case by
multiplying the Medicare 2005 hospital
wage index for each facility by the
labor-related share and adding the nonlabor share. We used the correct labor
share value of 72.247 percent on page
66953 in Table 8 of the final rule.
However, we inadvertently did not use
the correct labor-related and non-labor
share values in other portions of the
final rule. Instead of using 72.247
percent for the labor share and 27.753
percent for the non-labor share, we used
a value of 72.528 percent for the labor
share and 27.472 percent for the nonlabor share. This error only affected the
values in the payment calculation
examples on pages 66942, 66943, 66960,
and 66961 of the final rule (See sections
III.A.9, III.A.10 and the values in the
outlier calculation example in section
III.A.25 of this correction notice). These
errors did not have any effect on actual
payments. The table in Addendum A on
page 66982 of the final rule that
contains the labor and non-labor portion
of the Per Diem Rate is also corrected in
section III.C of this correction notice.
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
ER01AP05.004
III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
The table reflects the incorrect
percentages for the labor- and non-laborrelated shares, and therefore the dollar
amounts are incorrect. However, as with
the above examples, this error does not
represent a change in policy from the
final rule, and it did not affect any
actual Medicare payments. In addition,
we issued Change Request 3541
(CR3541), Transmittal 384, on December
1, 2004 that clarified the correct labor
and non-labor portions of the Federal
per diem base rate.
One of the patient-level adjustments
we proposed was a comorbidity
adjustment. We provided a comorbidity
list in the preamble of the proposed rule
(68 FR 66930 and 66931). In the final
rule, we made changes to the proposed
IPF PPS comorbidity category list. We
revised the list by: (1) Adding a new
category entitled ‘‘Developmental
Disabilities’’; (2) deleting the HIV
category and moving it into the
‘‘Infectious Diseases’’ category; and (3)
changing the titles of two categories,
‘‘Malignant Neoplasms’’ to ‘‘Oncology
Treatment,’’ and ‘‘Atherosclerosis of the
extremity with Gangrene’’ to
‘‘Gangrene.’’ However, we inadvertently
published several inconsistencies in the
list of comorbidities. In order to receive
the comorbidity adjustment for
malignant neoplasms, we reported that
IPFs will be required to code the ICD–
9–CM code for the specific malignant
neoplasm from ICD–9–CM chapter 2
codes (140 through 239) and one of the
two ICD–9–CM procedures codes
(chemotherapy (V58.0) or radiation
treatment (V58.1)) to indicate the
treatment modality the patient received.
The ICD–9–CM chapter 2 codes for
Neoplasm actually includes both benign
and malignant neoplasm codes.
Therefore, in order to be consistent with
our policy, we are clarifying in section
III.A.7.c of this correction notice that we
are including all of the codes in ICD–9–
CM chapter 2 for Neoplasm. We are also
deleting the word ‘‘malignant’’ in the
three places it appears on page 66939 in
the final rule. In addition, we
inadvertently reported V codes instead
of the ICD–9–CM radiation and
chemotherapy procedure codes. In order
to be consistent with our policy, we
deleted the V codes and reported the
correct ICD–9–CM procedure codes. We
are clarifying the policy in sections
III.A.7 through III.A.13 of this correction
notice.
Several ICD–9–CM codes were
inadvertently omitted or reported
incorrectly in the preamble of the final
rule. These mistakes include: Chronic
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (for
which we incorrectly reported code
V461 instead of V4611, and neglected to
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
report code V4612); Infectious Diseases
category (for which we incorrectly
reported code 0100 instead of code
01000); Oncology Treatment category
(for which we incorrectly reported code
140 instead of code 1400); and Renal
Failure, Acute category (for which we
incorrectly reported codes 6363 and
6373, and neglected to report several
codes). In addition, we inadvertently
omitted one code from under the Drug
and/or Alcohol Induced Mental
Disorders. We are also revising the
Diabetes category to include both Type
I and Type II Diabetes because this
comorbidity category contains diagnosis
codes for both types of Diabetes and we
neglected to include Type II in the final
rule. We are correcting these mistakes in
sections III.A.8.a through III.A.8.g and
section III.A.11 of this correction notice.
On page 66945 of the preamble, we
included a claims processing
description that we believe is
operational and therefore inappropriate
for inclusion in the final rule. In the
preamble of the final rule on page
66966, we indicate that we will issue
operational instructions to address
specific billing issues. Therefore, we are
deleting the paragraph on page 66945
that explains the processing of claims
for the IPF PPS (see section III.A.12.f of
this correction). The coding logic that
identifies the primary diagnosis code as
non-psychiatric and searches the
secondary codes for a psychiatric code
to assign a DRG code for an adjustment
will be provided in the claims
processing instructions. In the event
that the coding logic is changed in the
future, we need only make changes to
the claims processing instructions rather
than to the regulations.
In the Code First example we
provided in the final rule on page
66945, we made a typographic error and
listed the ICD–9–CM code for Dementia
as ‘‘33.82’’ instead of ‘‘331.82.’’ In
addition, we inadvertently omitted two
5-digit ICD–9–CM codes (294.10 and
294.11) that fall under 294.1. Finally,
the website we provided for the Official
Guidelines for Coding and Reporting
was incorrect. We are making these
corrections in section III.A.12 of this
correction notice.
In the preamble of the final rule, we
indicate in several places that IPFs must
indicate on their claims the revenue
code and procedure code for
Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) (Rev
code 901 and procedure code 90870)
and the number of units of ECT, that is,
the number of ECT treatments the
patient received during the IPF stay. We
explain that providing these data will
ensure that facilities are appropriately
reimbursed for the treatments they
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16725
provided. We inadvertently referred to
the Current Procedural Terminology
(CPT) procedure code 90870 for ECT
treatments rather than using the ICD–9–
CM procedure code 94.27. Therefore,
sections III.A.15.b and c of this
correction notice replace the CPT
procedure code 90870 with the ICD–9–
CM procedure code.
In the preamble of the final rule on
page 66951, we state that the ECT rate
is adjusted by the facility
characteristics, but we neglected to
mention that the Cost of Living
Adjustment (COLA) is one of these
characteristics. The COLA is described
elsewhere in the final rule on pages
66957 and 66958 and the correction of
this omission does not represent a
change in our policy. We are making
this correction in section III.A.15.d of
this correction notice.
In section III.A.17.b of this notice, we
correct a typographical error in Table 8
on page 66953. Each of the values listed
in the second column is correct,
including the final total. However, we
incorrectly reported the sum of the first
four values (the subtotal) as 68.818
instead of 68.878. The incorrect value
was not factored into any payment
calculations, so no Medicare payments
were affected by this error.
In sections III.A.19 through III.A.21
and in section III.B (under § 412.422) of
this correction notice, we describe the
teaching status adjustments. Beginning
on page 66954 of the final rule, we
presented the public comments and our
responses to the proposed changes.
However, we inadvertently omitted one
comment that was timely submitted
regarding our proposed teaching
adjustment. The commenter asked if the
IPF PPS would compensate for a school
of nursing and a pastoral care teaching
program. We indicate that we will pay
for such programs, and that these
payments are ‘‘pass-through’’ paid
outside the PPS. We insert that
comment and our response in section
III.A.21. We also amend the preamble
and the regulation text to correct the
range of approved medical education
programs that are treated as passthrough costs. The range listed in the
final rule inadvertently did not cover all
approved programs. This correction
clarifies that the list of programs
includes direct graduate medical
education and nursing and allied health
education activities. The correction of
this list of programs is consistent with
our policy as published in the final rule
and does not reflect a change in policy.
We neglected to state in the final rule
that we will be obtaining the total
Medicare inpatient routine charges from
the Provider Statistical &
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
16726
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Reimbursement Reconciliation Reports
(PS&R) associated with the applicable
cost report for IPFs that are distinct part
units. This is how we routinely obtain
charges, but we neglected to include
this statement in our final rule. The
clarification is made in section III.A.26
of this correction notice.
Throughout the final rule, we explain
that the IPF PPS is effective for cost
reporting periods beginning on or after
January 1, 2005. However, on page
66970 of the preamble to the final rule,
we mistakenly stated that the
methodology used for determining the
Federal per diem base rate for cost
reporting periods beginning on or after
‘‘January 5, 2005’’ includes certain
factors. We correct this typographical
error, changing January 5, to January 1,
in section III.A.27 of this correction
notice.
The Federal per diem base rate is
$575.95, as indicated in the final rule,
including in Table 8 on page 66982.
However, on page 66972, in the
Regulatory Impact Analysis, we
mistakenly noted that the Federal per
diem base rate is $572.00. In section
III.A.28 of this notice, we correct the
value of the Federal per diem base rate
to be consistent with the rest of the final
rule. This error had no payment
implications as the incorrect number
was not used in any calculations or
payments.
In addition to correcting errors in the
preamble, we also corrected several
sections of the regulation text (see
section III.B. of this correction notice).
In discussing the Federal per diem base
rate (§ 412.424), we incorrectly
described the rate as ‘‘unadjusted’’ in
§ 412.424(c)(1). In order to be consistent
with the actual policy, as described on
pages 66931 through 66933 of the final
rule, we changed ‘‘unadjusted’’ to
‘‘adjusted’’ to reflect that the Federal per
diem base rate is the rate that has been
adjusted for budget neutrality,
behavioral offset, and outlier and stoploss payments.
We inadvertently created a paragraph
for high-cost adjustment cases that
virtually duplicates § 412.424(d)(3)(i),
the provision on outlier payments.
Therefore, we deleted the paragraph
titled ‘‘Adjustment for high-cost cases.’’
In the final rule, we included
§ 412.424(d)(3), which sets forth our
specific outliers policy for discharges
occurring in cost reporting periods
beginning on or after January 1, 2005.
However, we meant to set forth our
general outliers policy as reflected in
the preamble of the final rule on page
66960, not the specific policy for the IPF
PPS implementation period. Therefore,
we corrected the section on outlier
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
payments to describe our general
outliers methodology that is not specific
to the IPF PPS implementation period.
In § 412.426 of the regulation text, we
inadvertently used incorrect dates for
the cost reporting periods for the
transition period from a blended PPS
payment to a full PPS payment. Our
policy is clear from the discussion in
the preamble on pages 66964 through
66966 that the transition period dates
correlate to the cost reporting year.
However, in § 412.426, we inadvertently
inserted the dates that reflect the IPF
PPS update cycle instead of cost
reporting years. This correction does not
reflect a change in policy, rather, it
conforms the regulation text to the
actual policy. The errors did not affect
payments in any way. In fact, no claims
are being processed under the new bill
processing system for the IPF PPS until
its implementation on April 4, 2005.
In the final rule, on page 66952, we
indicated that the wage indexes we are
using are the pre-classified FY 2005
hospital wage indexes, as set forth in
Addenda B1 and B2. In Addendum A,
we incorrectly identified the wage index
we are using as the ‘‘IPPS’’ wage index.
Therefore, in this correction notice, we
correct the reference to the wage index
from ‘‘IPPS’’ to the pre-reclassified FY
2005 hospital wage index.
In Addendum B1, an incorrect wage
index value was reported and an MSA
designation was incorrectly reported.
The errors, however, are only in the
Addendum. The correct wage index
value and MSA designation were
reflected in PRICER at the time of the
effective date of the final rule. The
errors had no effect on payment, and the
correction is being made to conform the
wage index value and MSA designation
to the actual policy that was in place at
the time the final rule was effective.
In the preamble of the final rule, on
pages 66959 and 66960, we set forth our
policy of providing a facility-level
adjustment for IPFs for both psychiatric
hospitals and acute care hospitals with
a distinct part psychiatric unit that
maintain a qualifying emergency
department (ED). We intended that the
adjustment only be provided to
hospitals with EDs that are staffed and
equipped to furnish a comprehensive
array of emergency services and that
meet the definition of a ‘‘dedicated
emergency department’’ as specified in
§ 489.24 and the definition of ‘‘providerbased status’’ (as corrected, from
‘‘provider-based entity’’ to ‘‘providerbased status’’ in section III.A.24.a,
below) as specified in § 413.65. We
defined a full-service ED in order to
avoid providing an ED adjustment to an
intake unit that is not comparable to a
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
full-service ED with respect to the array
of emergency services available. We
provided that the ED adjustment will be
incorporated into the variable per diem
adjustment for the first day of each stay.
That is, IPFs with qualifying EDs will
receive a higher variable per diem
adjustment for the first day of each stay
than will other IPFs. (See page 66960 of
the final rule.) However, in Addendum
A, under the Variable Per Diem
Adjustments chart, for Day 1 (on both
lines), we erroneously indicated an
adjustment factor for a facility with and
without a ‘‘24/7’’ full-service ED. Our
definition of full-service ED does not
include any reference to ‘‘24/7.’’
Therefore, the reference may be
confusing and could raise questions. In
order to be consistent with our
definition of a full-service ED, we are
deleting the references to ‘‘24/7’’ in
section III.C of this correction notice. In
addition, although we believe that
describing a full-service ED as providing
a ‘‘comprehensive array of emergency
services’’ was clear, we are further
clarifying that full-service EDs furnish
medical as well as psychiatric
treatment.
In the final rule, on page 66937, we
stated that our policy is that we will
provide the Federal per diem base rate
payment under the IPF PPS for claims
with a principal diagnosis included in
Chapter Five of the ICD–9–CM or the
DSM–IV–TR. In the final rule, on pages
67014 through 67015, we provided a
chart, Addendum C—Code First, which
lists the ICD–9–CM Disease Code First
instructions as of 2005 (effective
October 1, 2004). These codes are the
mental disorder codes 290 through 319,
included in Chapter Five of ICD–9–CM.
We inadvertently included code 320.7,
Bacterial Meningitis. Because code
320.7 is not a mental disorder code, we
are removing it in section III.C of this
correction notice.
In addition to the preamble
corrections described above, we made
incorrect cross-references and other
typographical errors in the final rule
that we are correcting in this document.
III. Correction of Errors
A. Preamble Corrections
In the final rule published on
November 15, 2004 (69 FR 66922), make
the following corrections:
1. On page 66922, in column 3 of the
Table of Contents, lines 37 through 38,
‘‘Addendum A: Proposed Inpatient PPS
Adjustments’’ is corrected to
‘‘Addendum A: Psychiatric Prospective
Payment Rate and Adjustment Factors.’’
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
2. On page 66923, in column 3, in line
16, remove the period after the word
‘‘example.’’
3. On page 66924, in column 1, in the
second full paragraph, line 1, remove
the parenthesis before the word ‘‘We.’’
4. On page 66932, in column 1, in line
19, the words ‘‘Federal per diem base
rate’’ are corrected to ‘‘average cost per
day’’.
5. On page 66934, in column 3, in line
1, the word ‘‘conditions’’ is corrected to
‘‘condition categories.’’
6. On page 66936,
a. In column 2, in the third full
paragraph, in lines 6 and 7, the phrase
‘‘labor-related share (.72528) and adding
the non-labor share (.27472)’’ is
corrected to ‘‘labor-related share
(0.72247) and adding the non-labor
share (0.27753).’’
b. In column 3, in the second
paragraph, in line 6, add the words ‘‘all
of’’ before the word ‘‘these.’’
7. On page 66939,
a. In column 1, in line 1, the word
‘‘constructive’’ is corrected to
‘‘obstructive.’’
b. In column 2, in the first full
paragraph, in lines 9, 18, and 21, the
word ‘‘malignant’’ is removed.
c. In column 2, in the first full
paragraph, in lines 13 through 16, the
sentence ‘‘As a result, we have added
two ICD–9–CM codes, one for
chemotherapy (V58.0) and one for
radiation treatment (V58.1).’’ is
corrected to ‘‘As a result, we have added
ICD–9–CM procedure codes for
radiation therapy (92.21 through 92.29)
and for chemotherapy (99.25).’’
d. In column 2, in the first full
paragraph, in lines 22 through 26, the
phrase ‘‘one of the two ICD–9–CM
procedures codes (chemotherapy
((V58.0)) or radiation treatment ((V58.1))
to indicate the treatment modality the
patient received.’’ Is corrected to ‘‘an
ICD–9–CM procedure code for radiation
therapy codes (92.21 through 92.29) or
for chemotherapy (99.25).’’
8. On page 66940,
a. In column 1, in Table 4, in row 8,
and on page 66944, in column 1, in
Table 5, in row 7, ‘‘Uncontrolled Type
I Diabetes Mellitus, with or without
complications’’ is corrected to
‘‘Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus’’. We
are also revising the chart on page 66984
in line 9 in the same manner.
b. In column 2, in Table 4, in row 11,
‘‘0411’’ is corrected to ‘‘04110’’.
c. In columns 2 and 3, in Table 4, in
row 11, ‘‘0100’’ is corrected to ‘‘01000’’.
d. In column 2, in Table 4, in row 12,
insert the code ‘‘29212’’.
e. In column 3, in Table 4, in row 5,
remove the figures ‘‘6363 and 6373’’ and
add in their place the figures ‘‘63630,
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
63631, 63632, 63730, 63731, and
63732.’’
f. In column 3, in Table 4, in row 7,
‘‘Treatment 140 through 2399 WITH
either V580 or V581’’ is corrected to
‘‘Treatment 1400 through 2399 WITH
either 92.21 through 92.29 or 99.25’’.
g. In column 3, in Table 4, in row 15,
remove the code ‘‘V461’’ and add in its
place the codes ‘‘V4611 and V4612’’.
9. On page 66942,
a. In column 2 of the chart, in row 25,
the figure ‘‘0.72528’’ is corrected to
‘‘0.72247’’.
b. In column 2 of the chart in row 26,
the figure ‘‘0.27472’’ is corrected to
‘‘0.27753’’.
c. In column 3 of the chart, in row 25,
the figure ‘‘417.73’’ is corrected to
‘‘416.11’’.
d. In column 3 of the chart in row 26,
the figure ‘‘158.22’’ is corrected to
‘‘159.84’’.
e. In column 1, in Step 1, in lines 5
and 6, the figures ‘‘(0.7743 × 417.73 =
$323.45) are corrected to ‘‘(0.7743 ×
416.11 = $322.19).’’
f. In column 1, in Step 2, in lines 5
and 6, the figures ‘‘($323.45 + 158.22 =
$481.67)’’ are corrected to ‘‘(322.19 +
159.84 = $482.03).’’
g. In column 3, in Step 3, in line 5,
the figures ‘‘($481.67 × 1.4181 =
683.06)’’ are corrected to ‘‘($482.03 ×
1.4181 = $683.57).’’
10. On page 66943, in column 1, in
Step 3, the second numeric multiplier,
683.06, and the dollar amounts in each
of the equations and in the Federal per
diem payment amount, are revised as
follows:
Day 1 (adjustment factor
1.31) × 683.57 ...................
Day 2 (adjustment factor
1.12) × 683.57 ...................
Day 3 (adjustment factor
1.08) × 683.57 ...................
Day 4 (adjustment factor
1.05) × 683.57 ...................
Day 5 (adjustment factor
1.04) × 683.57 ...................
Day 6 (adjustment factor
1.02) × 683.57 ...................
Day 7 (adjustment factor
1.01) × 683.57 ...................
Day 8 (adjustment factor
1.01) × 683.57 ...................
Day 9 (adjustment factor
1.00) × 683.57 ...................
Day 10 (adjustment factor
1.00) × 683.57 ...................
Federal per diem payment amount .............
=
$895.48
=
765.60
=
738.26
=
717.75
=
710.91
=
697.24
=
690.41
=
690.41
=
683.57
=
683.57
=
7,273.20
11. On page 66944,
a. In column 1, in Table 5, in row 3,
‘‘Tracheotomy’’ is corrected to
‘‘Tracheostomy’’.
b. In column 2, in Table 5, in row 4,
remove the figures ‘‘6363 and 6373’’ and
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16727
add in their place the figures ‘‘63630,
63631, 63632, 63730, 63731, and
63732’’.
c. In column 2, in Table 5, in row 6,
‘‘1400 through 2399 WITH either V58.0
OR V58.1’’ is corrected to ‘‘1400 through
2399 WITH either 92.21 through 92.29
or 99.25’’.
d. In column 2, in Table 5, in row 11,
insert the code ‘‘29212’’.
e. In column 2, in Table 5, in row 14,
remove the words ‘‘and V461’’ and
insert ‘‘V4611 and V4612’’.
12. On page 66945,
a. In column 1, in lines 10 through 11,
‘‘www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ics9/
icdguide.pdf’’ is corrected to
‘‘www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/icd9/
icdguide.pdf.’’
b. In column 3, in the first full
paragraph, in line 1, the code ‘‘294.1’’ is
corrected to ‘‘294.11’’.
c. In column 3, in the first full
paragraph, in line three, the words
‘‘With Behavioral Disturbance’’ are
added before the words ‘‘is designated’’.
d. In column 3, under the subheading
for ‘‘294.1 Dementia in Conditions
Classified Elsewhere,’’ in line 6, the
code ‘‘(33.82)’’ is corrected to
‘‘(331.82)’’.
e. In column 3, under the subheading
for ‘‘294.1 Dementia in Conditions
Classified Elsewhere’’ and before the
paragraph that begins with ‘‘In
accordance with the ICD–9–CM’’ insert
the following subheading: ‘‘294.10
Dementia in Conditions Classified
Elsewhere Without Behavioral
Disturbances (not allowed as principal
DX)’’ and 294.11 Dementia in
Conditions Classified Elsewhere With
Behavioral Disturbances (not allowed as
principal DX)’’.
f. In column 3, in the paragraph that
begins with ‘‘In accordance with’’, in
line 8, remove the words ‘‘states ‘‘code
first any underlying physical condition
as:’’ and add in its place the words ‘‘is
designated as ‘‘code first,’’ indicating
that all 5 digit diagnosis codes that fall
under 294.1 (codes 294.10 and 294.11)
must follow the code first rule.
According to the code first
requirements,’’.
In the same paragraph, in lines 55
through 64, remove the sentences ‘‘The
submitted claim goes through the CMS
processing system that will identify the
primary diagnosis code as nonpsychiatric and search the secondary
codes for a psychiatric code to assign a
DRG code for adjustment. The system
will continue to search the secondary
codes for those that are appropriate for
comorbidity adjustment.’’
13. On page 66946,
a. In column 1, in lines 7 through 9,
the words ‘‘appropriate treatment V
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
16728
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
code V580 chemotherapy or V581
radiation.’’ is corrected to ‘‘appropriate
procedure code from radiation therapy
codes (92.21 through 92.29) or
chemotherapy (99.25).’’
b. In column 1, in line 10, the crossreference ‘‘VI.B.5.C.’’ is corrected to
‘‘VI.B.6.c’’.
c. In column 1, in line 16, the phrase
‘‘(code 90870)’’ is corrected to ‘‘(code
94.27).’’
14. On page 66950, in column 2, in
the third response to comment, in line
6, ‘‘say’’ is corrected to ‘‘stay’’.
15. On page 66951,
a. In column 1, in the first response
to comment, in line 17, the crossreference ‘‘VI.B.5.b.’’ is corrected to
‘‘VI.C.4.d’’.
b. In column 1, in the first comment
under the heading c, in line 3, remove
‘‘(procedure code 90870)’’ and replace it
with ‘‘(ICD–9–CM procedure code
94.27)’’.
c. In column 2, in the third full
paragraph, in line 8, remove ‘‘procedure
code 90870’’ and replace it with ‘‘ICD–
9–CM procedure code 94.27’’.
d. In column 2, in the fifth full
paragraph, in lines 11 through 13, the
sentence ‘‘We will adjust the ECT rate
for wage differences in the same manner
that we adjust the per diem rate.’’ is
corrected to ‘‘We will adjust the ECT
rate by the area wage index and any
applicable cost of living adjustment
(COLA), in the same manner that we
adjust the per diem rate.’’
e. In column 3, in line 16, the word
‘‘ETC’’ is corrected to ‘‘ECT’’.
16. On page 66952, in column 1, in
line 1, the word ‘‘my’’ is corrected to
‘‘may’’.
17. On page 66953,
a. In column 2, in the second
paragraph of the response to comment,
in line 10, remove the number ‘‘0’’
before the word ‘‘labor-related’’ and add
in its place ‘‘The’’.
b. In column 2, in the second
paragraph of the response to comment,
in line 14; in column 3, Table 8, row 6;
and in column 3, line 5; the figure
‘‘68.818’’ is corrected to ‘‘68.878’’.
18. On page 66954,
a. In column 2, in the first full
paragraph, in line 9, the cross-reference
‘‘VIII’’ is corrected to ‘‘XII’’.
b. In column 3, in the first full
paragraph, in line 12, the crossreference ‘‘V.C.3.’’ is corrected to
‘‘V.D.2’’.
19. On page 66955, in column 1, line
24, the reference ‘‘§ 413.83’’ is corrected
to ‘‘§ 413.85’’.
20. On page 66956,
a. In column 3, in Step 2 of the
response to comment under Step 2, in
line 8, the figure ‘‘5.1’’ is corrected to
‘‘5.0’’.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
b. In column 3, in Step 2 of the
response to comment under Step 2, in
line 11, the figure ‘‘9.9’’ is corrected to
‘‘9.8’’.
21. On page 66957, in column 1,
before the sub-heading, ‘‘Other FacilityLevel Adjustments,’’ the following
comment and response are added:
Comment: One commenter asked if
the IPF PPS would compensate for a
school of nursing and a pastoral care
teaching program.
Response: Under 42 CFR 413.85,
hospitals that operate approved nursing
or allied health education programs may
receive Medicare payment on a
reasonable cost basis for costs of these
programs. The payment is a ‘‘passthrough’’ (that is, it is paid separately
and distinctly from the IPF PPS;
similarly, it was paid separately from
the TEFRA target amounts). If a
freestanding IPF operates an approved
nursing or allied health program, we
pay the IPF for Medicare’s share of the
reasonable costs of the program (for
example, costs incurred for trainee
stipends and compensation of teachers).
If an IPPS hospital with a psychiatric
unit has a nursing or allied health
program, then we will pay the IPPS
hospital for training costs incurred in
the IPPS and the psychiatric unit parts
of the hospital.
22. On page 66958, in column 3, in
line 17, the number ‘‘8’’ is corrected to
‘‘9’’.
23. On page 66959, in column 3, in
line 7, the word ‘‘a’’ is corrected to
‘‘an’’.
24. On page 66960,
a. In column 1, in line 18, the word
‘‘entity’’ is corrected to ‘‘status’’.
b. In column 1, at the end of the first
paragraph, add the following sentence:
‘‘We intend to pay the ED adjustment to
IPFs with EDs that furnish medical as
well as psychiatric emergency
treatment.’’
c. In column 1, in paragraph 4, in line
3, remove the word ‘‘of’’ before the word
‘‘the’’.
d. In column 3, in the third full
paragraph, in line 4, the figure
‘‘$7267.75’’ is corrected to ‘‘$7273.20’’.
e. In column 3, in Step 1, in lines 3
and 4, the figure ‘‘0.72528’’ is corrected
to ‘‘0.72247’’, and the figure ‘‘$3201.03’’
is corrected to ‘‘$3188.63’’.
f. In column 3, in Step 2, in lines 3
through 5, the figures ‘‘$5700 × 0.27472
(non-labor share) = $1565.90 $1565.90 +
$3201.03 = $4766.93’’ are corrected to
‘‘$5700 × 0.27753 (non-labor share) =
$1581.92
$1581.92 + $3188.63 = $4770.55’’.
g. In column 3, in Step 3, in line 3,
the figure ‘‘$4766.96’’ is corrected to
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘$4770.55’’ and in line 4, the figure
‘‘$5577.31’’ is corrected to ‘‘$5581.54’’.
25. On page 66961,
a. In column 1, in line 1, the figures
‘‘$5577.31 + $7267.75 = $12,845.06’’ are
corrected to ‘‘$5581.54 + $7273.20 =
$12,854.74’’.
b. In column 1, in line 3, the figure
‘‘$12,845.06’’ is corrected to
‘‘$12,854.74’’.
c. In column 1, in Step 1, in line 4,
the figures ‘‘$12,845.06 = $3954.94’’ are
corrected to ‘‘$12854.74 = $3945.26’’.
d. In column 1, in Step 2, in line 3,
the figures ‘‘$3594.94/10 = $395.49’’ are
corrected to ‘‘$3945.26/10 = $394.53’’.
e. In column 1, in Step 3, in lines 3
and 4, the figures ‘‘$395.49 × 0.80 =
$316.40’’ and the figures ‘‘$316.40 × 9
days = $2847.60’’ are corrected to
‘‘$394.53 × 0.80 = $315.62’’ and
‘‘$315.62 × 9 days = $2840.58’’,
respectively.
f. In column 1, in Step 4, in line 3,
the figures ‘‘395 × 0.60 = $237.30’’ are
corrected to ‘‘$394.53 × 0.60 = $236.72’’.
g. In column 1, in the paragraph after
Step 4, in line 3, the figure ‘‘$3084.90’’
is corrected to ‘‘$3077.30’’ and in line 4,
the figures ‘‘$2847.60 + $237.30’’ are
corrected to ‘‘$2840.58 + $236.72’’.
26. On page 66962, in column 3, in
the second full paragraph, in line 4,
remove the words ‘‘estimated by
dividing Medicare routine costs on’’ and
add in their place the words ‘‘obtained
from the PS&R report associated with
the applicable cost report. (If PS&R data
are not available, estimate Medicare
routine charges.’’ In line 11, add a close
parenthesis after the word ‘‘charges’’
and in line 21, add the words ‘‘or M’’
before the words ‘‘in the third position.’’
27. On page 66970, in column 3, in
line 20, the date ‘‘January 5’’ is
corrected to ‘‘January 1’’.
28. On page 66972, in column 3, in
the last paragraph, in line 7, the figure
‘‘$572’’ is corrected to ‘‘$575.95’’.
B. Corrections to the Regulations Text
Accordingly, 42 CFR chapter IV is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendments to part 412:
I
PART 412—[CORRECTED]
1. The authority citation for part 412
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and
1395hh).
§ 412.402
[Corrected]
2. In § 412.402 under the definition of
‘‘Qualifying emergency department,’’ the
word ‘‘meting’’ is corrected to
‘‘meeting’’.
I
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
§ 412.422
[Corrected]
Addendum B1
3. In § 412.422(b)(1) ‘‘§ 413.79 through
§ 413.75’’ is corrected to ‘‘§ 413.75
through § 413.85’’.
I
§ 412.424
[Corrected]
4. In § 412.424,
a. In paragraph (c)(1), in the second
and third sentences, the word
‘‘unadjusted’’ is corrected to ‘‘adjusted’’.
I b. In paragraph (d) introductory text,
the words ‘‘and the patient-level
adjustments applicable’’ are corrected to
‘‘patient-level adjustments and other
policy adjustments applicable to the
case.’’
I c. In paragraph (d)(3)(i), the words ‘‘per
diem’’ before the words ‘‘payment
amount’’ are removed.
I d. Paragraph (d)(3)(v) is removed.
I e. Paragraph (d)(3)(i)(B) is corrected to
read as follows:
I
I
1. On page 66989, in column 2 of the
Table, in row 10, remove the words
‘‘Stanly, NC’’.
2. On page 67012, in column 3 of the
Table, in row 6, the figure ‘‘0.9468’’ is
corrected to ‘‘0.9486’’.
Addendum C
1. On page 67015, in columns 1 and
2, the last row is removed.
IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
and Waiver of 30-Day Delay in the
Effective Date
We ordinarily publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register to provide a period for public
comment before the provisions of a rule
take effect in accordance with section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However,
we can waive the notice and comment
§ 412.424 Methodology for calculating the
procedures if the Secretary finds, for
Federal per diem payment amount.
good cause, that the notice and
*
*
*
*
*
comment process is impracticable,
(d) * * *
unnecessary or contrary to the public
(3) * * *
interest, and incorporates a statement of
(i) * * *
the finding and the reasons therefore in
(B) The outlier payment equals a
percentage of the difference between the the notice.
The policies and payment
IPF’s estimated cost for the case and the
methodology expressed in the
adjusted threshold amount specified by
November 15, 2004 final rule have
CMS for each day of the inpatient stay.
previously been subjected to notice and
*
*
*
*
*
comment procedures. This correction
§ 412.426 [Corrected]
notice makes changes to conform the
regulation text to the policies described
I 5. In § 412.426,
in the preamble of the November 15,
I a. In paragraph (a) introductory text,
‘‘June 30, 2008’’ is corrected to ‘‘January 2004 final rule. This correction notice
also revises the preamble of the
1, 2008’’.
November 15, 2004 final rule to make
I b. In paragraph (a)(1), ‘‘June 30, 2006’’
clarifications, correct references,
is corrected to ‘‘January 1, 2006’’.
I c. In paragraph (a)(2), ‘‘July 1, 2006’’ is
include an inadvertently omitted
corrected to ‘‘January 1, 2006’’ and ‘‘June comment and response, and correct
30, 2007’’ is corrected to ‘‘January 1,
typographical errors. This correction
2007’’.
notice is intended to ensure that the
I d. In paragraph (a)(3), ‘‘July 1, 2007’’ is
November 15, 2004 final rule accurately
corrected to ‘‘January 1, 2007’’ and ‘‘June reflects the policies expressed in the
30, 2008’’ is corrected to ‘‘January 1,
final rule. Therefore, we find it
2008’’.
unnecessary to undertake further notice
I e. In paragraph (a)(4), ‘‘July 1, 2008’’ is
and comment procedures with respect
corrected to ‘‘January 1, 2008’’.
to this correction notice.
We are also waiving the 30-day delay
C. Corrections of Addenda
in effective date for this correction
Addendum A
notice. We ordinarily provide a 30-day
delay in the effective date of the
1. On page 66982,
provisions of a notice. Section 553(d) of
a. In column 2 of the Per Diem Rate
the Administrative Procedure Act
chart, in rows 2 and 3, the figure
‘‘$417.73’’ is corrected to ‘‘$416.11’’ and ordinarily requires a 30-day delay in the
effective date of final rules after the date
the figure ‘‘$158.22’’ is corrected to
of their publication in the Federal
‘‘$159.84’’.
Register. This 30-day delay in effective
b. In column 2 of the Facility
date can be waived, however, if an
Adjustments chart, in row 2, the words
agency finds for good cause that the
‘‘Same as IPPS’’ are corrected to ‘‘See
delay is impracticable, unnecessary, or
Addenda B1 and B2’’.
contrary to the public interest, and the
c. In column 1 of the Variable Per
agency incorporates a statement of the
Diem Adjustments chart, in rows 2 and
findings and its reasons in the rule
3, the figure ‘‘24/7’’ is removed.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16729
issued. In addition, section 1871(e)(1)(B)
of the Social Security Act, as amended
by section 903(b) of Pub. L. 108–173,
provides that substantive changes may
only take effect prior to the 30-day
effective date if the waiver of the 30-day
period is necessary to comply with
statutory requirements or the
application of the 30-day delay is
contrary to the public interest. We
believe that it is in the public interest
to ensure that the November 15, 2004
final rule accurately represents our
prospective payment methodology and
payment rates and that a delay in the
effective date of these corrections would
be contrary to the public interest.
We also find that it is in the public
interest to apply the changes in this
correction notice retroactively to
January 1, 2005, the effective date of the
November 15, 2004 final rule. Section
1871(e)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act,
as amended by section 903(a) of Pub. L.
108–173, provides that a substantive
change in regulations shall not be
applied retroactively to items and
services furnished before the effective
date of the change, unless the Secretary
finds that such retroactive application is
necessary to comply with statutory
requirements or failure to apply the
change retroactively would be contrary
to the public interest. In section III.A,
III.B, and III.C of this correction notice,
we have made substantive corrections to
errors in the preamble, regulatory
impact analysis, regulation text, and the
Addenda of the November 15, 2004 final
rule to ensure that the final rule
accurately reflects our policies and
payment methodologies. Although the
November 15, 2004 final rule contained
errors, we implemented correct policies
and payment methodologies as of
January 1, 2005. Therefore, not applying
these changes retroactively to January 1,
2005 would have a disruptive effect on
IPF PPS. As a result, we are applying
the changes in this correction notice
retroactively to January 1, 2005 because
we believe it would be contrary to the
public interest to do otherwise.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
Dated: March 23, 2005.
Ann C. Agnew,
Executive Secretary to the Department.
[FR Doc. 05–6379 Filed 3–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 62 (Friday, April 1, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16724-16729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6379]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Parts 412 and 413
[CMS-1213-CN]
RIN 0938-AL50
Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System for Inpatient
Psychiatric Facilities; Final Rule; Correction
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Correction of final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects errors that appeared in the final rule
published in the Federal Register on November 15, 2004, entitled
``Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System for Inpatient
Psychiatric Facilities.'' This document also supplements the November
15, 2004 final rule.
DATES: Effective January 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet Samen, (410) 786-9161.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In FR Doc. 04-24787 of November 15, 2004 (69 FR 66922), there were
several errors that are identified in the ``Summary of Errors'' section
and corrected in the ``Correction of Errors'' section below. In
addition to clarifying ambiguities and correcting typographical errors
and incorrect references, this document is a supplement to the document
published on November 15, 2004, entitled ``Medicare Program;
Prospective Payment System for Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities''
(hereinafter referred to as the IPF PPS final rule or final rule)
because it includes a timely submitted comment and our response that we
inadvertently failed to include in the final rule. The provisions of
this correction notice are effective as if they had been included in
the final rule. Accordingly, the corrections are effective January 1,
2005.
II. Summary of Errors
In the November 15, 2004 final rule, in payment calculation
examples, we stated that we computed a wage adjustment factor for each
case by multiplying the Medicare 2005 hospital wage index for each
facility by the labor-related share and adding the non-labor share. We
used the correct labor share value of 72.247 percent on page 66953 in
Table 8 of the final rule. However, we inadvertently did not use the
correct labor-related and non-labor share values in other portions of
the final rule. Instead of using 72.247 percent for the labor share and
27.753 percent for the non-labor share, we used a value of 72.528
percent for the labor share and 27.472 percent for the non-labor share.
This error only affected the values in the payment calculation examples
on pages 66942, 66943, 66960, and 66961 of the final rule (See sections
III.A.9, III.A.10 and the values in the outlier calculation example in
section III.A.25 of this correction notice). These errors did not have
any effect on actual payments. The table in Addendum A on page 66982 of
the final rule that contains the labor and non-labor portion of the Per
Diem Rate is also corrected in section III.C of this correction notice.
[[Page 16725]]
The table reflects the incorrect percentages for the labor- and non-
labor-related shares, and therefore the dollar amounts are incorrect.
However, as with the above examples, this error does not represent a
change in policy from the final rule, and it did not affect any actual
Medicare payments. In addition, we issued Change Request 3541 (CR3541),
Transmittal 384, on December 1, 2004 that clarified the correct labor
and non-labor portions of the Federal per diem base rate.
One of the patient-level adjustments we proposed was a comorbidity
adjustment. We provided a comorbidity list in the preamble of the
proposed rule (68 FR 66930 and 66931). In the final rule, we made
changes to the proposed IPF PPS comorbidity category list. We revised
the list by: (1) Adding a new category entitled ``Developmental
Disabilities''; (2) deleting the HIV category and moving it into the
``Infectious Diseases'' category; and (3) changing the titles of two
categories, ``Malignant Neoplasms'' to ``Oncology Treatment,'' and
``Atherosclerosis of the extremity with Gangrene'' to ``Gangrene.''
However, we inadvertently published several inconsistencies in the list
of comorbidities. In order to receive the comorbidity adjustment for
malignant neoplasms, we reported that IPFs will be required to code the
ICD-9-CM code for the specific malignant neoplasm from ICD-9-CM chapter
2 codes (140 through 239) and one of the two ICD-9-CM procedures codes
(chemotherapy (V58.0) or radiation treatment (V58.1)) to indicate the
treatment modality the patient received. The ICD-9-CM chapter 2 codes
for Neoplasm actually includes both benign and malignant neoplasm
codes. Therefore, in order to be consistent with our policy, we are
clarifying in section III.A.7.c of this correction notice that we are
including all of the codes in ICD-9-CM chapter 2 for Neoplasm. We are
also deleting the word ``malignant'' in the three places it appears on
page 66939 in the final rule. In addition, we inadvertently reported V
codes instead of the ICD-9-CM radiation and chemotherapy procedure
codes. In order to be consistent with our policy, we deleted the V
codes and reported the correct ICD-9-CM procedure codes. We are
clarifying the policy in sections III.A.7 through III.A.13 of this
correction notice.
Several ICD-9-CM codes were inadvertently omitted or reported
incorrectly in the preamble of the final rule. These mistakes include:
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (for which we incorrectly
reported code V461 instead of V4611, and neglected to report code
V4612); Infectious Diseases category (for which we incorrectly reported
code 0100 instead of code 01000); Oncology Treatment category (for
which we incorrectly reported code 140 instead of code 1400); and Renal
Failure, Acute category (for which we incorrectly reported codes 6363
and 6373, and neglected to report several codes). In addition, we
inadvertently omitted one code from under the Drug and/or Alcohol
Induced Mental Disorders. We are also revising the Diabetes category to
include both Type I and Type II Diabetes because this comorbidity
category contains diagnosis codes for both types of Diabetes and we
neglected to include Type II in the final rule. We are correcting these
mistakes in sections III.A.8.a through III.A.8.g and section III.A.11
of this correction notice.
On page 66945 of the preamble, we included a claims processing
description that we believe is operational and therefore inappropriate
for inclusion in the final rule. In the preamble of the final rule on
page 66966, we indicate that we will issue operational instructions to
address specific billing issues. Therefore, we are deleting the
paragraph on page 66945 that explains the processing of claims for the
IPF PPS (see section III.A.12.f of this correction). The coding logic
that identifies the primary diagnosis code as non-psychiatric and
searches the secondary codes for a psychiatric code to assign a DRG
code for an adjustment will be provided in the claims processing
instructions. In the event that the coding logic is changed in the
future, we need only make changes to the claims processing instructions
rather than to the regulations.
In the Code First example we provided in the final rule on page
66945, we made a typographic error and listed the ICD-9-CM code for
Dementia as ``33.82'' instead of ``331.82.'' In addition, we
inadvertently omitted two 5-digit ICD-9-CM codes (294.10 and 294.11)
that fall under 294.1. Finally, the website we provided for the
Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting was incorrect. We are
making these corrections in section III.A.12 of this correction notice.
In the preamble of the final rule, we indicate in several places
that IPFs must indicate on their claims the revenue code and procedure
code for Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) (Rev code 901 and procedure
code 90870) and the number of units of ECT, that is, the number of ECT
treatments the patient received during the IPF stay. We explain that
providing these data will ensure that facilities are appropriately
reimbursed for the treatments they provided. We inadvertently referred
to the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) procedure code 90870 for
ECT treatments rather than using the ICD-9-CM procedure code 94.27.
Therefore, sections III.A.15.b and c of this correction notice replace
the CPT procedure code 90870 with the ICD-9-CM procedure code.
In the preamble of the final rule on page 66951, we state that the
ECT rate is adjusted by the facility characteristics, but we neglected
to mention that the Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) is one of these
characteristics. The COLA is described elsewhere in the final rule on
pages 66957 and 66958 and the correction of this omission does not
represent a change in our policy. We are making this correction in
section III.A.15.d of this correction notice.
In section III.A.17.b of this notice, we correct a typographical
error in Table 8 on page 66953. Each of the values listed in the second
column is correct, including the final total. However, we incorrectly
reported the sum of the first four values (the subtotal) as 68.818
instead of 68.878. The incorrect value was not factored into any
payment calculations, so no Medicare payments were affected by this
error.
In sections III.A.19 through III.A.21 and in section III.B (under
Sec. 412.422) of this correction notice, we describe the teaching
status adjustments. Beginning on page 66954 of the final rule, we
presented the public comments and our responses to the proposed
changes. However, we inadvertently omitted one comment that was timely
submitted regarding our proposed teaching adjustment. The commenter
asked if the IPF PPS would compensate for a school of nursing and a
pastoral care teaching program. We indicate that we will pay for such
programs, and that these payments are ``pass-through'' paid outside the
PPS. We insert that comment and our response in section III.A.21. We
also amend the preamble and the regulation text to correct the range of
approved medical education programs that are treated as pass-through
costs. The range listed in the final rule inadvertently did not cover
all approved programs. This correction clarifies that the list of
programs includes direct graduate medical education and nursing and
allied health education activities. The correction of this list of
programs is consistent with our policy as published in the final rule
and does not reflect a change in policy.
We neglected to state in the final rule that we will be obtaining
the total Medicare inpatient routine charges from the Provider
Statistical &
[[Page 16726]]
Reimbursement Reconciliation Reports (PS&R) associated with the
applicable cost report for IPFs that are distinct part units. This is
how we routinely obtain charges, but we neglected to include this
statement in our final rule. The clarification is made in section
III.A.26 of this correction notice.
Throughout the final rule, we explain that the IPF PPS is effective
for cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005.
However, on page 66970 of the preamble to the final rule, we mistakenly
stated that the methodology used for determining the Federal per diem
base rate for cost reporting periods beginning on or after ``January 5,
2005'' includes certain factors. We correct this typographical error,
changing January 5, to January 1, in section III.A.27 of this
correction notice.
The Federal per diem base rate is $575.95, as indicated in the
final rule, including in Table 8 on page 66982. However, on page 66972,
in the Regulatory Impact Analysis, we mistakenly noted that the Federal
per diem base rate is $572.00. In section III.A.28 of this notice, we
correct the value of the Federal per diem base rate to be consistent
with the rest of the final rule. This error had no payment implications
as the incorrect number was not used in any calculations or payments.
In addition to correcting errors in the preamble, we also corrected
several sections of the regulation text (see section III.B. of this
correction notice). In discussing the Federal per diem base rate (Sec.
412.424), we incorrectly described the rate as ``unadjusted'' in Sec.
412.424(c)(1). In order to be consistent with the actual policy, as
described on pages 66931 through 66933 of the final rule, we changed
``unadjusted'' to ``adjusted'' to reflect that the Federal per diem
base rate is the rate that has been adjusted for budget neutrality,
behavioral offset, and outlier and stop-loss payments.
We inadvertently created a paragraph for high-cost adjustment cases
that virtually duplicates Sec. 412.424(d)(3)(i), the provision on
outlier payments. Therefore, we deleted the paragraph titled
``Adjustment for high-cost cases.''
In the final rule, we included Sec. 412.424(d)(3), which sets
forth our specific outliers policy for discharges occurring in cost
reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2005. However, we
meant to set forth our general outliers policy as reflected in the
preamble of the final rule on page 66960, not the specific policy for
the IPF PPS implementation period. Therefore, we corrected the section
on outlier payments to describe our general outliers methodology that
is not specific to the IPF PPS implementation period.
In Sec. 412.426 of the regulation text, we inadvertently used
incorrect dates for the cost reporting periods for the transition
period from a blended PPS payment to a full PPS payment. Our policy is
clear from the discussion in the preamble on pages 66964 through 66966
that the transition period dates correlate to the cost reporting year.
However, in Sec. 412.426, we inadvertently inserted the dates that
reflect the IPF PPS update cycle instead of cost reporting years. This
correction does not reflect a change in policy, rather, it conforms the
regulation text to the actual policy. The errors did not affect
payments in any way. In fact, no claims are being processed under the
new bill processing system for the IPF PPS until its implementation on
April 4, 2005.
In the final rule, on page 66952, we indicated that the wage
indexes we are using are the pre-classified FY 2005 hospital wage
indexes, as set forth in Addenda B1 and B2. In Addendum A, we
incorrectly identified the wage index we are using as the ``IPPS'' wage
index. Therefore, in this correction notice, we correct the reference
to the wage index from ``IPPS'' to the pre-reclassified FY 2005
hospital wage index.
In Addendum B1, an incorrect wage index value was reported and an
MSA designation was incorrectly reported. The errors, however, are only
in the Addendum. The correct wage index value and MSA designation were
reflected in PRICER at the time of the effective date of the final
rule. The errors had no effect on payment, and the correction is being
made to conform the wage index value and MSA designation to the actual
policy that was in place at the time the final rule was effective.
In the preamble of the final rule, on pages 66959 and 66960, we set
forth our policy of providing a facility-level adjustment for IPFs for
both psychiatric hospitals and acute care hospitals with a distinct
part psychiatric unit that maintain a qualifying emergency department
(ED). We intended that the adjustment only be provided to hospitals
with EDs that are staffed and equipped to furnish a comprehensive array
of emergency services and that meet the definition of a ``dedicated
emergency department'' as specified in Sec. 489.24 and the definition
of ``provider-based status'' (as corrected, from ``provider-based
entity'' to ``provider-based status'' in section III.A.24.a, below) as
specified in Sec. 413.65. We defined a full-service ED in order to
avoid providing an ED adjustment to an intake unit that is not
comparable to a full-service ED with respect to the array of emergency
services available. We provided that the ED adjustment will be
incorporated into the variable per diem adjustment for the first day of
each stay. That is, IPFs with qualifying EDs will receive a higher
variable per diem adjustment for the first day of each stay than will
other IPFs. (See page 66960 of the final rule.) However, in Addendum A,
under the Variable Per Diem Adjustments chart, for Day 1 (on both
lines), we erroneously indicated an adjustment factor for a facility
with and without a ``24/7'' full-service ED. Our definition of full-
service ED does not include any reference to ``24/7.'' Therefore, the
reference may be confusing and could raise questions. In order to be
consistent with our definition of a full-service ED, we are deleting
the references to ``24/7'' in section III.C of this correction notice.
In addition, although we believe that describing a full-service ED as
providing a ``comprehensive array of emergency services'' was clear, we
are further clarifying that full-service EDs furnish medical as well as
psychiatric treatment.
In the final rule, on page 66937, we stated that our policy is that
we will provide the Federal per diem base rate payment under the IPF
PPS for claims with a principal diagnosis included in Chapter Five of
the ICD-9-CM or the DSM-IV-TR. In the final rule, on pages 67014
through 67015, we provided a chart, Addendum C--Code First, which lists
the ICD-9-CM Disease Code First instructions as of 2005 (effective
October 1, 2004). These codes are the mental disorder codes 290 through
319, included in Chapter Five of ICD-9-CM. We inadvertently included
code 320.7, Bacterial Meningitis. Because code 320.7 is not a mental
disorder code, we are removing it in section III.C of this correction
notice.
In addition to the preamble corrections described above, we made
incorrect cross-references and other typographical errors in the final
rule that we are correcting in this document.
III. Correction of Errors
A. Preamble Corrections
In the final rule published on November 15, 2004 (69 FR 66922),
make the following corrections:
1. On page 66922, in column 3 of the Table of Contents, lines 37
through 38, ``Addendum A: Proposed Inpatient PPS Adjustments'' is
corrected to ``Addendum A: Psychiatric Prospective Payment Rate and
Adjustment Factors.''
[[Page 16727]]
2. On page 66923, in column 3, in line 16, remove the period after
the word ``example.''
3. On page 66924, in column 1, in the second full paragraph, line
1, remove the parenthesis before the word ``We.''
4. On page 66932, in column 1, in line 19, the words ``Federal per
diem base rate'' are corrected to ``average cost per day''.
5. On page 66934, in column 3, in line 1, the word ``conditions''
is corrected to ``condition categories.''
6. On page 66936,
a. In column 2, in the third full paragraph, in lines 6 and 7, the
phrase ``labor-related share (.72528) and adding the non-labor share
(.27472)'' is corrected to ``labor-related share (0.72247) and adding
the non-labor share (0.27753).''
b. In column 3, in the second paragraph, in line 6, add the words
``all of'' before the word ``these.''
7. On page 66939,
a. In column 1, in line 1, the word ``constructive'' is corrected
to ``obstructive.''
b. In column 2, in the first full paragraph, in lines 9, 18, and
21, the word ``malignant'' is removed.
c. In column 2, in the first full paragraph, in lines 13 through
16, the sentence ``As a result, we have added two ICD-9-CM codes, one
for chemotherapy (V58.0) and one for radiation treatment (V58.1).'' is
corrected to ``As a result, we have added ICD-9-CM procedure codes for
radiation therapy (92.21 through 92.29) and for chemotherapy (99.25).''
d. In column 2, in the first full paragraph, in lines 22 through
26, the phrase ``one of the two ICD-9-CM procedures codes (chemotherapy
((V58.0)) or radiation treatment ((V58.1)) to indicate the treatment
modality the patient received.'' Is corrected to ``an ICD-9-CM
procedure code for radiation therapy codes (92.21 through 92.29) or for
chemotherapy (99.25).''
8. On page 66940,
a. In column 1, in Table 4, in row 8, and on page 66944, in column
1, in Table 5, in row 7, ``Uncontrolled Type I Diabetes Mellitus, with
or without complications'' is corrected to ``Uncontrolled Diabetes
Mellitus''. We are also revising the chart on page 66984 in line 9 in
the same manner.
b. In column 2, in Table 4, in row 11, ``0411'' is corrected to
``04110''.
c. In columns 2 and 3, in Table 4, in row 11, ``0100'' is corrected
to ``01000''.
d. In column 2, in Table 4, in row 12, insert the code ``29212''.
e. In column 3, in Table 4, in row 5, remove the figures ``6363 and
6373'' and add in their place the figures ``63630, 63631, 63632, 63730,
63731, and 63732.''
f. In column 3, in Table 4, in row 7, ``Treatment 140 through 2399
WITH either V580 or V581'' is corrected to ``Treatment 1400 through
2399 WITH either 92.21 through 92.29 or 99.25''.
g. In column 3, in Table 4, in row 15, remove the code ``V461'' and
add in its place the codes ``V4611 and V4612''.
9. On page 66942,
a. In column 2 of the chart, in row 25, the figure ``0.72528'' is
corrected to ``0.72247''.
b. In column 2 of the chart in row 26, the figure ``0.27472'' is
corrected to ``0.27753''.
c. In column 3 of the chart, in row 25, the figure ``417.73'' is
corrected to ``416.11''.
d. In column 3 of the chart in row 26, the figure ``158.22'' is
corrected to ``159.84''.
e. In column 1, in Step 1, in lines 5 and 6, the figures ``(0.7743
x 417.73 = $323.45) are corrected to ``(0.7743 x 416.11 = $322.19).''
f. In column 1, in Step 2, in lines 5 and 6, the figures ``($323.45
+ 158.22 = $481.67)'' are corrected to ``(322.19 + 159.84 = $482.03).''
g. In column 3, in Step 3, in line 5, the figures ``($481.67 x
1.4181 = 683.06)'' are corrected to ``($482.03 x 1.4181 = $683.57).''
10. On page 66943, in column 1, in Step 3, the second numeric
multiplier, 683.06, and the dollar amounts in each of the equations and
in the Federal per diem payment amount, are revised as follows:
Day 1 (adjustment factor 1.31) x 683.57................. = $895.48
Day 2 (adjustment factor 1.12) x 683.57................. = 765.60
Day 3 (adjustment factor 1.08) x 683.57................. = 738.26
Day 4 (adjustment factor 1.05) x 683.57................. = 717.75
Day 5 (adjustment factor 1.04) x 683.57................. = 710.91
Day 6 (adjustment factor 1.02) x 683.57................. = 697.24
Day 7 (adjustment factor 1.01) x 683.57................. = 690.41
Day 8 (adjustment factor 1.01) x 683.57................. = 690.41
Day 9 (adjustment factor 1.00) x 683.57................. = 683.57
Day 10 (adjustment factor 1.00) x 683.57................ = 683.57
----------
Federal per diem payment amount..................... = 7,273.20
11. On page 66944,
a. In column 1, in Table 5, in row 3, ``Tracheotomy'' is corrected
to ``Tracheostomy''.
b. In column 2, in Table 5, in row 4, remove the figures ``6363 and
6373'' and add in their place the figures ``63630, 63631, 63632, 63730,
63731, and 63732''.
c. In column 2, in Table 5, in row 6, ``1400 through 2399 WITH
either V58.0 OR V58.1'' is corrected to ``1400 through 2399 WITH either
92.21 through 92.29 or 99.25''.
d. In column 2, in Table 5, in row 11, insert the code ``29212''.
e. In column 2, in Table 5, in row 14, remove the words ``and
V461'' and insert ``V4611 and V4612''.
12. On page 66945,
a. In column 1, in lines 10 through 11, ``www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/
ics9/icdguide.pdf'' is corrected to ``www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/icd9/
icdguide.pdf.''
b. In column 3, in the first full paragraph, in line 1, the code
``294.1'' is corrected to ``294.11''.
c. In column 3, in the first full paragraph, in line three, the
words ``With Behavioral Disturbance'' are added before the words ``is
designated''.
d. In column 3, under the subheading for ``294.1 Dementia in
Conditions Classified Elsewhere,'' in line 6, the code ``(33.82)'' is
corrected to ``(331.82)''.
e. In column 3, under the subheading for ``294.1 Dementia in
Conditions Classified Elsewhere'' and before the paragraph that begins
with ``In accordance with the ICD-9-CM'' insert the following
subheading: ``294.10 Dementia in Conditions Classified Elsewhere
Without Behavioral Disturbances (not allowed as principal DX)'' and
294.11 Dementia in Conditions Classified Elsewhere With Behavioral
Disturbances (not allowed as principal DX)''.
f. In column 3, in the paragraph that begins with ``In accordance
with'', in line 8, remove the words ``states ``code first any
underlying physical condition as:'' and add in its place the words ``is
designated as ``code first,'' indicating that all 5 digit diagnosis
codes that fall under 294.1 (codes 294.10 and 294.11) must follow the
code first rule. According to the code first requirements,''.
In the same paragraph, in lines 55 through 64, remove the sentences
``The submitted claim goes through the CMS processing system that will
identify the primary diagnosis code as non-psychiatric and search the
secondary codes for a psychiatric code to assign a DRG code for
adjustment. The system will continue to search the secondary codes for
those that are appropriate for comorbidity adjustment.''
13. On page 66946,
a. In column 1, in lines 7 through 9, the words ``appropriate
treatment V
[[Page 16728]]
code V580 chemotherapy or V581 radiation.'' is corrected to
``appropriate procedure code from radiation therapy codes (92.21
through 92.29) or chemotherapy (99.25).''
b. In column 1, in line 10, the cross-reference ``VI.B.5.C.'' is
corrected to ``VI.B.6.c''.
c. In column 1, in line 16, the phrase ``(code 90870)'' is
corrected to ``(code 94.27).''
14. On page 66950, in column 2, in the third response to comment,
in line 6, ``say'' is corrected to ``stay''.
15. On page 66951,
a. In column 1, in the first response to comment, in line 17, the
cross-reference ``VI.B.5.b.'' is corrected to ``VI.C.4.d''.
b. In column 1, in the first comment under the heading c, in line
3, remove ``(procedure code 90870)'' and replace it with ``(ICD-9-CM
procedure code 94.27)''.
c. In column 2, in the third full paragraph, in line 8, remove
``procedure code 90870'' and replace it with ``ICD-9-CM procedure code
94.27''.
d. In column 2, in the fifth full paragraph, in lines 11 through
13, the sentence ``We will adjust the ECT rate for wage differences in
the same manner that we adjust the per diem rate.'' is corrected to
``We will adjust the ECT rate by the area wage index and any applicable
cost of living adjustment (COLA), in the same manner that we adjust the
per diem rate.''
e. In column 3, in line 16, the word ``ETC'' is corrected to
``ECT''.
16. On page 66952, in column 1, in line 1, the word ``my'' is
corrected to ``may''.
17. On page 66953,
a. In column 2, in the second paragraph of the response to comment,
in line 10, remove the number ``0'' before the word ``labor-related''
and add in its place ``The''.
b. In column 2, in the second paragraph of the response to comment,
in line 14; in column 3, Table 8, row 6; and in column 3, line 5; the
figure ``68.818'' is corrected to ``68.878''.
18. On page 66954,
a. In column 2, in the first full paragraph, in line 9, the cross-
reference ``VIII'' is corrected to ``XII''.
b. In column 3, in the first full paragraph, in line 12, the cross-
reference ``V.C.3.'' is corrected to ``V.D.2''.
19. On page 66955, in column 1, line 24, the reference ``Sec.
413.83'' is corrected to ``Sec. 413.85''.
20. On page 66956,
a. In column 3, in Step 2 of the response to comment under Step 2,
in line 8, the figure ``5.1'' is corrected to ``5.0''.
b. In column 3, in Step 2 of the response to comment under Step 2,
in line 11, the figure ``9.9'' is corrected to ``9.8''.
21. On page 66957, in column 1, before the sub-heading, ``Other
Facility-Level Adjustments,'' the following comment and response are
added:
Comment: One commenter asked if the IPF PPS would compensate for a
school of nursing and a pastoral care teaching program.
Response: Under 42 CFR 413.85, hospitals that operate approved
nursing or allied health education programs may receive Medicare
payment on a reasonable cost basis for costs of these programs. The
payment is a ``pass-through'' (that is, it is paid separately and
distinctly from the IPF PPS; similarly, it was paid separately from the
TEFRA target amounts). If a freestanding IPF operates an approved
nursing or allied health program, we pay the IPF for Medicare's share
of the reasonable costs of the program (for example, costs incurred for
trainee stipends and compensation of teachers). If an IPPS hospital
with a psychiatric unit has a nursing or allied health program, then we
will pay the IPPS hospital for training costs incurred in the IPPS and
the psychiatric unit parts of the hospital.
22. On page 66958, in column 3, in line 17, the number ``8'' is
corrected to ``9''.
23. On page 66959, in column 3, in line 7, the word ``a'' is
corrected to ``an''.
24. On page 66960,
a. In column 1, in line 18, the word ``entity'' is corrected to
``status''.
b. In column 1, at the end of the first paragraph, add the
following sentence: ``We intend to pay the ED adjustment to IPFs with
EDs that furnish medical as well as psychiatric emergency treatment.''
c. In column 1, in paragraph 4, in line 3, remove the word ``of''
before the word ``the''.
d. In column 3, in the third full paragraph, in line 4, the figure
``$7267.75'' is corrected to ``$7273.20''.
e. In column 3, in Step 1, in lines 3 and 4, the figure ``0.72528''
is corrected to ``0.72247'', and the figure ``$3201.03'' is corrected
to ``$3188.63''.
f. In column 3, in Step 2, in lines 3 through 5, the figures
``$5700 x 0.27472 (non-labor share) = $1565.90 $1565.90 + $3201.03 =
$4766.93'' are corrected to
``$5700 x 0.27753 (non-labor share) = $1581.92
$1581.92 + $3188.63 = $4770.55''.
g. In column 3, in Step 3, in line 3, the figure ``$4766.96'' is
corrected to ``$4770.55'' and in line 4, the figure ``$5577.31'' is
corrected to ``$5581.54''.
25. On page 66961,
a. In column 1, in line 1, the figures ``$5577.31 + $7267.75 =
$12,845.06'' are corrected to ``$5581.54 + $7273.20 = $12,854.74''.
b. In column 1, in line 3, the figure ``$12,845.06'' is corrected
to ``$12,854.74''.
c. In column 1, in Step 1, in line 4, the figures ``$12,845.06 =
$3954.94'' are corrected to ``$12854.74 = $3945.26''.
d. In column 1, in Step 2, in line 3, the figures ``$3594.94/10 =
$395.49'' are corrected to ``$3945.26/10 = $394.53''.
e. In column 1, in Step 3, in lines 3 and 4, the figures ``$395.49
x 0.80 = $316.40'' and the figures ``$316.40 x 9 days = $2847.60'' are
corrected to ``$394.53 x 0.80 = $315.62'' and ``$315.62 x 9 days =
$2840.58'', respectively.
f. In column 1, in Step 4, in line 3, the figures ``395 x 0.60 =
$237.30'' are corrected to ``$394.53 x 0.60 = $236.72''.
g. In column 1, in the paragraph after Step 4, in line 3, the
figure ``$3084.90'' is corrected to ``$3077.30'' and in line 4, the
figures ``$2847.60 + $237.30'' are corrected to ``$2840.58 + $236.72''.
26. On page 66962, in column 3, in the second full paragraph, in
line 4, remove the words ``estimated by dividing Medicare routine costs
on'' and add in their place the words ``obtained from the PS&R report
associated with the applicable cost report. (If PS&R data are not
available, estimate Medicare routine charges.'' In line 11, add a close
parenthesis after the word ``charges'' and in line 21, add the words
``or M'' before the words ``in the third position.''
27. On page 66970, in column 3, in line 20, the date ``January 5''
is corrected to ``January 1''.
28. On page 66972, in column 3, in the last paragraph, in line 7,
the figure ``$572'' is corrected to ``$575.95''.
B. Corrections to the Regulations Text
0
Accordingly, 42 CFR chapter IV is corrected by making the following
correcting amendments to part 412:
PART 412--[CORRECTED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 412 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1302 and 1395hh).
Sec. 412.402 [Corrected]
0
2. In Sec. 412.402 under the definition of ``Qualifying emergency
department,'' the word ``meting'' is corrected to ``meeting''.
[[Page 16729]]
Sec. 412.422 [Corrected]
0
3. In Sec. 412.422(b)(1) ``Sec. 413.79 through Sec. 413.75'' is
corrected to ``Sec. 413.75 through Sec. 413.85''.
Sec. 412.424 [Corrected]
0
4. In Sec. 412.424,
0
a. In paragraph (c)(1), in the second and third sentences, the word
``unadjusted'' is corrected to ``adjusted''.
0
b. In paragraph (d) introductory text, the words ``and the patient-
level adjustments applicable'' are corrected to ``patient-level
adjustments and other policy adjustments applicable to the case.''
0
c. In paragraph (d)(3)(i), the words ``per diem'' before the words
``payment amount'' are removed.
0
d. Paragraph (d)(3)(v) is removed.
0
e. Paragraph (d)(3)(i)(B) is corrected to read as follows:
Sec. 412.424 Methodology for calculating the Federal per diem payment
amount.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) The outlier payment equals a percentage of the difference
between the IPF's estimated cost for the case and the adjusted
threshold amount specified by CMS for each day of the inpatient stay.
* * * * *
Sec. 412.426 [Corrected]
0
5. In Sec. 412.426,
0
a. In paragraph (a) introductory text, ``June 30, 2008'' is corrected
to ``January 1, 2008''.
0
b. In paragraph (a)(1), ``June 30, 2006'' is corrected to ``January 1,
2006''.
0
c. In paragraph (a)(2), ``July 1, 2006'' is corrected to ``January 1,
2006'' and ``June 30, 2007'' is corrected to ``January 1, 2007''.
0
d. In paragraph (a)(3), ``July 1, 2007'' is corrected to ``January 1,
2007'' and ``June 30, 2008'' is corrected to ``January 1, 2008''.
0
e. In paragraph (a)(4), ``July 1, 2008'' is corrected to ``January 1,
2008''.
C. Corrections of Addenda
Addendum A
1. On page 66982,
a. In column 2 of the Per Diem Rate chart, in rows 2 and 3, the
figure ``$417.73'' is corrected to ``$416.11'' and the figure
``$158.22'' is corrected to ``$159.84''.
b. In column 2 of the Facility Adjustments chart, in row 2, the
words ``Same as IPPS'' are corrected to ``See Addenda B1 and B2''.
c. In column 1 of the Variable Per Diem Adjustments chart, in rows
2 and 3, the figure ``24/7'' is removed.
Addendum B1
1. On page 66989, in column 2 of the Table, in row 10, remove the
words ``Stanly, NC''.
2. On page 67012, in column 3 of the Table, in row 6, the figure
``0.9468'' is corrected to ``0.9486''.
Addendum C
1. On page 67015, in columns 1 and 2, the last row is removed.
IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and Waiver of 30-Day Delay in the
Effective Date
We ordinarily publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register to provide a period for public comment before the
provisions of a rule take effect in accordance with section 553(b) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However, we
can waive the notice and comment procedures if the Secretary finds, for
good cause, that the notice and comment process is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates a
statement of the finding and the reasons therefore in the notice.
The policies and payment methodology expressed in the November 15,
2004 final rule have previously been subjected to notice and comment
procedures. This correction notice makes changes to conform the
regulation text to the policies described in the preamble of the
November 15, 2004 final rule. This correction notice also revises the
preamble of the November 15, 2004 final rule to make clarifications,
correct references, include an inadvertently omitted comment and
response, and correct typographical errors. This correction notice is
intended to ensure that the November 15, 2004 final rule accurately
reflects the policies expressed in the final rule. Therefore, we find
it unnecessary to undertake further notice and comment procedures with
respect to this correction notice.
We are also waiving the 30-day delay in effective date for this
correction notice. We ordinarily provide a 30-day delay in the
effective date of the provisions of a notice. Section 553(d) of the
Administrative Procedure Act ordinarily requires a 30-day delay in the
effective date of final rules after the date of their publication in
the Federal Register. This 30-day delay in effective date can be
waived, however, if an agency finds for good cause that the delay is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and the
agency incorporates a statement of the findings and its reasons in the
rule issued. In addition, section 1871(e)(1)(B) of the Social Security
Act, as amended by section 903(b) of Pub. L. 108-173, provides that
substantive changes may only take effect prior to the 30-day effective
date if the waiver of the 30-day period is necessary to comply with
statutory requirements or the application of the 30-day delay is
contrary to the public interest. We believe that it is in the public
interest to ensure that the November 15, 2004 final rule accurately
represents our prospective payment methodology and payment rates and
that a delay in the effective date of these corrections would be
contrary to the public interest.
We also find that it is in the public interest to apply the changes
in this correction notice retroactively to January 1, 2005, the
effective date of the November 15, 2004 final rule. Section
1871(e)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act, as amended by section 903(a)
of Pub. L. 108-173, provides that a substantive change in regulations
shall not be applied retroactively to items and services furnished
before the effective date of the change, unless the Secretary finds
that such retroactive application is necessary to comply with statutory
requirements or failure to apply the change retroactively would be
contrary to the public interest. In section III.A, III.B, and III.C of
this correction notice, we have made substantive corrections to errors
in the preamble, regulatory impact analysis, regulation text, and the
Addenda of the November 15, 2004 final rule to ensure that the final
rule accurately reflects our policies and payment methodologies.
Although the November 15, 2004 final rule contained errors, we
implemented correct policies and payment methodologies as of January 1,
2005. Therefore, not applying these changes retroactively to January 1,
2005 would have a disruptive effect on IPF PPS. As a result, we are
applying the changes in this correction notice retroactively to January
1, 2005 because we believe it would be contrary to the public interest
to do otherwise.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773,
Medicare--Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare--
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: March 23, 2005.
Ann C. Agnew,
Executive Secretary to the Department.
[FR Doc. 05-6379 Filed 3-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P