Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; VOC RACT Determinations for Three Individual Sources, 16717-16720 [05-6378]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(5) Maps showing designated use
areas are available at park headquarters.
(6) Use of an ice auger or power
engine on any land surface or frozen
water surface outside of designated use
areas is prohibited without a permit.
Dated: March 18, 2005.
Paul Hoffman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 05–6385 Filed 3–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–97–P
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
36 CFR Part 1270
RIN 3095–AB40
Presidential Records Act Procedures
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In response to a petition for
rulemaking, NARA is amending our
rules concerning Presidential records to
lengthen the time from 10 working days
to 35 calendar days to appeal denial of
access. This proposed rule will affect
the public.
DATES: Effective May 2, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Davis Heaps at (301) 837–1801.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed rule was published in the
October 1, 2004, Federal Register (69 FR
58875) for a 60-day public comment
period. NARA notified several
researcher organizations about the
proposed rule. A copy of the proposed
rule was also posted on the NARA Web
site. NARA received three responses to
the proposed rule from the public.
NARA proposed, in response to a
petition for proposed rulemaking, to
extend the timeframe in which a person
may appeal the denial of a request for
access to Presidential records made
under the Presidential Records Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 2201–2207). Two
public commenters agreed with the
proposed regulation changes. One
member of the public objected to
NARA’s proposed length of appeal time.
The commenter said that a requester
should be able to appeal NARA’s letter
of denial ‘‘within 35 working days after
the requester receives written
notification,’’ not ‘‘within 35 calendar
days of the date of NARA’s denial
letter’’ as NARA proposed.
We did not adopt that
recommendation. The commenter
argued that the proposed length in
timeframe was unfair because the
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:23 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
delivery of NARA’s denial letter could
be considerably delayed. The
commenter said that the appeal
timeframe should continue to be based
on when the requester receives the
denial, not the date of NARA’s denial
letter.
NARA proposed the timeframe
requested by the petitioners, which was
based on the timeframe for appeals
NARA permits under the provisions of
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
(see 36 CFR 1250.72(a)) and the Privacy
Act (PA) (see 36 CFR 1202.56(a)). The
petition cited the following compelling
reasons for requesting an extension to
the length of time to file an appeal
under the PRA:
• NARA’s longer appeal timeframes
for FOIA and PA denials;
• The disparity with the lengthy
waits requesters have, only to learn of
a denial of access; and,
• Extenuating circumstances that
make it difficult for requesters to appeal
in 10 days after receipt of NARA’s
denial. Among the latter are requesters
being on vacation, business trips, and
academic absences like visiting
professorships and sabbaticals.
The petitioners’ request is based on
well-recognized and widely accepted
practices in implementing the FOIA.
NARA believes that this rule will be of
assistance to requesters of Presidential
records.
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). As required by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, it is hereby
certified that this rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities because this
rule applies to the public. This rule does
not have any federalism implications.
This rule is not a major rule as defined
in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 8, Congressional
Review of Agency Rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1270
Archives and records.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, NARA amends part 1270 of
title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 1270—PRESIDENTIAL
RECORDS
1. The authority citation for part 1270
is revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 2201–2207.
2. Amend § 1270.42 by revising
paragraphs (a), (b), and (d) to read as
follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16717
Subpart D—Access to Presidential
Records
§ 1270.42 Denial of access to public; right
to appeal.
(a) Any person denied access to a
Presidential record (hereinafter the
requester) because of a determination
that the record or a reasonable
segregable portion of the record was
properly restricted under 44 U.S.C.
2204(a), and not placed in the public
domain by the former President or his
agent, may file an administrative appeal
with the appropriate Presidential library
director at the address cited in part 1253
of this chapter.
(b) All appeals must be received by
NARA within 35 calendar days of the
date of NARA’s denial letter.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Upon receipt of an appeal, the
appropriate Presidential library director
has 30 working days from the date an
appeal is received to consider the
appeal and respond in writing to the
requester. The director’s response must
state whether or not the Presidential
records requested are to be released and
the basis for this determination. The
director’s decision to withhold release
of Presidential records is final and not
subject to judicial review.
Dated: March 25, 2005.
Allen Weinstein,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 05–6410 Filed 3–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R03–OAR–2005–PA–0006; FRL–7893–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; VOC RACT
Determinations for Three Individual
Sources
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The
revisions were submitted by the
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP) to
establish and require reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for
three major sources of volatile organic
compounds (VOC). These sources are
located in Pennsylvania. EPA is
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
16718
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
approving these revisions to establish
RACT requirements in the SIP in
accordance with the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
This rule is effective on May 31,
2005 without further notice, unless EPA
receives adverse written comment by
May 2, 2005. If EPA receives such
comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number R03–OAR–
2005–PA–0006 by one of the following
methods:
A. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Agency Web site: https://
www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ RME,
EPA’s electronic public docket and
comment system, is EPA’s preferred
method for receiving comments. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
C. E-mail: morris.makeba@epa.gov.
D. Mail: R03–OAR–2005–PA–0006,
Makeba Morris, Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
E. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
RME ID No. R03–OAR–2005–PA–0006.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through RME,
regulations.gov or e-mail. The EPA RME
and the Federal regulations.gov Web
sites are an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be
DATES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the RME
index at https://www.docket.epa.gov/
rmepub/. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O.
Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LaKeshia Robertson, (215) 814–2113, or
by e-mail at robertson.lakeshia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Pursuant to sections 182(b)(2) and
182(f) of the CAA, the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania (the Commonwealth or
Pennsylvania) is required to establish
and implement RACT for all major VOC
and NOX sources. The major source size
is determined by its location, the
classification of that area and whether it
is located in the ozone transport region
(OTR). Under section 184 of the CAA,
RACT as specified in sections 182(b)(2)
and 182(f) applies throughout the OTR.
The entire Commonwealth is located
within the OTR. Therefore, RACT is
applicable statewide in Pennsylvania.
State implementation plan revisions
imposing RACT for three classes of VOC
sources are required under section
182(b)(2). The categories are:
(1) All sources covered by a Control
Technique Guideline (CTG) document
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
issued between November 15, 1990 and
the date of attainment;
(2) All sources covered by a CTG
issued prior to November 15, 1990; and
(3) All major non-CTG sources.
The Pennsylvania SIP already has
approved RACT regulations and
requirements for all sources and source
categories covered by the CTGs. The
Pennsylvania SIP also has approved
regulations to require major sources of
NOX and additional major sources of
VOC emissions (not covered by a CTG)
to implement RACT. These regulations
are commonly termed the ‘‘generic
RACT regulations’’. A generic RACT
regulation is one that does not, itself,
specifically define RACT for a source or
source categories but instead establishes
procedures for imposing case-by-case
RACT determinations. The
Commonwealth’s SIP-approved generic
RACT regulations consist of the
procedures PADEP uses to establish and
impose RACT for subject sources of
VOC and NOX. Pursuant to the SIPapproved generic RACT rules, PADEP
imposes RACT on each subject source in
an enforceable document, usually a Plan
Approval (PA) or Operating Permit (OP).
The Commonwealth then submits these
PAs and OPs to EPA for approval as
source-specific SIP revisions.
On August 30, 2004, PADEP
submitted revisions to the Pennsylvania
SIP which establish and impose RACT
for three sources of VOC. The
Commonwealth’s submittals consist of
PAs and OPs which impose VOC RACT
requirements for each source.
II. Summary of the SIP Revisions
Copies of the actual PAs and OPs
imposing RACT and PADEP’s
evaluation memoranda are included in
the electronic and hard copy docket for
this final rule. As previously stated, all
documents in the electronic docket are
listed in the RME index at https://
www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in RME or in hard
copy during normal business hours at
the Air Protection Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O.
Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania 17105. The table below
identifies the sources and the individual
PAs and OPs which are the subject of
this rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
16719
PENNSYLVANIA—VOC AND NOX RACT DETERMINATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL SOURCES
Source
County
Plan approval (PA #)
operating permit
(OP #)
Salem Tube, Inc ............
Mercer ...........................
OP 43–142 ....................
SGL Carbon Corporation
Elk ..................................
OP 24–131 ....................
Dominion Trans, Inc. .....
Clinton ...........................
18–00006 .......................
EPA is approving these RACT SIP
submittals because PADEP established
and imposed these RACT requirements
in accordance with the criteria set forth
in its SIP-approved generic RACT
regulations applicable to these sources.
The Commonwealth has also imposed
record-keeping, monitoring, and testing
requirements on these sources sufficient
to determine compliance with the
applicable RACT determinations.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the revisions to the
Pennsylvania SIP submitted by PADEP
to establish and require VOC RACT for
three major of sources. EPA is
publishing this rule without prior
proposal because the Agency views this
as a noncontroversial amendment and
anticipates no adverse comment.
However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of today’s Federal Register, EPA
is publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
SIP revision if adverse comments are
filed. This rule will be effective on May
31, 2005 without further notice unless
EPA receives adverse comment by May
2, 2005. If EPA receives adverse
comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. EPA will address all
public comments in a subsequent final
rule based on the proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
Source type
Five Reheat Furnaces and Trichloroethylene Dipping Tank.
Flame Grids, Furnaces, and Special Impregnation (resin).
Four Salt Heaters, Natural Gas Boiler, Two Hot
Water Heaters, Two Space Heaters, and Three
Superior Boilers.
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘Major
source’’
pollutant
VOC
VOC
VOC
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 804
exempts from section 801 the following
types of rules: (1) Rules of particular
applicability; (2) rules relating to agency
management or personnel; and (3) rules
of agency organization, procedure, or
practice that do not substantially affect
the rights or obligations of non-agency
parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). EPA is not
required to submit a rule report
regarding today’s action under section
801 because this is a rule of particular
applicability establishing sourcespecific requirements for three named
sources.
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
16720
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by May 31, 2005.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule
approving source-specific RACT
requirements for three sources in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: March 24, 2005.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
I
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
County
*
*
SGL Carbon Corporation ..... OP 24–131 ..
*
Elk ................
Salem Tube, Inc. .................
OP 43–142 ..
Mercer ..........
Dominion Trans, Inc ............
18–0006 .......
Clinton ..........
*
*
*
*
*
State effective date
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diane Milstead, (410) 786–3355.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Parts 403, 405, 410, 411, 414,
418, 424, 484, and 486
[CMS–1429–F2]
Medicare Program; Revisions to
Payment Policies Under the Physician
Fee Schedule for Calendar Year 2005:
Correcting Amendment
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document corrects
technical errors that appeared in the
final rule with comment period
published in the Federal Register on
November 15, 2004 entitled ‘‘Revisions
to Payment Policies Under the
Physician Fee Schedule for Calendar
Year 2005.’’
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective January 1, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:42 Mar 31, 2005
In FR Doc. 04–24758 of November 15,
2004 (69 FR 66236), there were a
number of technical errors that we are
identifying and correcting in the
‘‘Correction of Errors’’ section of this
correcting amendment. Additionally,
there are various revisions to Addenda
B, C and F.
Discussion of Addenda B, C and F
RIN 0938–AM90
Jkt 205001
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
In Addenda B and C, we assigned
incorrect status indicators to the
following CPT and HCPCS codes: Page
66429 for CPT codes 0066T and 0074T,
page 66502 for CPT code 36415, page
66504 for CPT code 37195, pages 66682
and 66688 for HCPCS code G0363. We
also assigned incorrect global periods
for the following CPT and HCPCS codes:
Page 66539 for CPT code 54150; pages
66638 and 66687 for CPT codes 91034,
91034–26, 91034–TC, 91035, 91035–26,
91035–TC, 91037, 91037–26, 91037–TC,
91038 91038–26, 91038–TC, 91040,
91040–26, 91040–TC; and pages 66682
and 66688 for G0350, G0354 and G0358.
These corrections are reflected in
section II.C.1 of this correcting
amendment.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Subpart NN—Pennsylvania
2. In § 52.2020, the table in paragraph
(d)(1) is amended by adding the entries
for Salem Tube, Inc., SGL Carbon
Corporation, and Dominion Trans, Inc. at
the end of the table to read as follows:
I
§ 52.2020
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
EPA approval date
*
*
*
5/12/95; 5/31/95 .................. 4/1/05, [Insert page number
where the document begins].
2/16/99 ................................ [4/1/05, [Insert page number
where the document begins].
6/15/99; 9/29/03 .................. 4/1/05, [Insert page number
where the document begins].
[FR Doc. 05–6378 Filed 3–31–05; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Permit
No.
Name of source
PART 52—[AMENDED]
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Additional
explanation/
§ 52.2063 citation
*
52.2020(d)(1)(e).
52.2020(d)(1)(e).
52.2020(d)(1)(e).
The short descriptors for the
following HCPCS codes were listed
incorrectly on page 66681: G0324,
G0325, G0326 and G0327. The corrected
descriptors are shown in section II.C.1
of this correcting amendment.
Incorrect practice expense relative
value units (RVUs) were shown for the
following CPT codes: Pages 66546 and
66685 for CPT code 58356; page 66557
for CPT codes 62367 and 62368; page
66614 for CPT code 77418; pages 66627
and 66686 for CPT codes 78811–26,
78812–26, 78813–26, 78814–26, 78815–
26 and 78816–26; page 66629 for CPT
code 88125 and 88125–TC; pages 66633
and 66687 for CPT codes 88367, 88367–
TC, 88368, 88368–TC and 89220; and
page 66665 for CPT code 96567. The
corrected RVUS are shown in section
II.C.2 of this correcting amendment.
On page 66666, we inadvertently
included work and malpractice RVUs
for acupuncture services, CPT codes
97810, 97811, 97813 and 97814 and
there services are not covered by
Medicare. We typically do not publish
RVUs for services that Medicare does
not cover. Instead, we list these services
with ‘‘0.00’s’’ in the RVU columns. This
correction is reflected in section II.C.2 of
this correcting amendment.
The following HCPCS codes were
discussed on page 66308 of the rule but
were inadvertently omitted from page
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 62 (Friday, April 1, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16717-16720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6378]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R03-OAR-2005-PA-0006; FRL-7893-2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; VOC RACT Determinations for Three Individual Sources
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's State Implementation Plan (SIP). The
revisions were submitted by the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP) to establish and require reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for three major sources of volatile
organic compounds (VOC). These sources are located in Pennsylvania. EPA
is
[[Page 16718]]
approving these revisions to establish RACT requirements in the SIP in
accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on May 31, 2005 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse written comment by May 2, 2005. If EPA
receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) IDNumber R03-OAR-2005-PA-0006 by one of the following
methods:
A. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
B. Agency Web site: https://www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ RME, EPA's
electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's preferred method
for receiving comments. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
C. E-mail: morris.makeba@epa.gov.
D. Mail: R03-OAR-2005-PA-0006, Makeba Morris, Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
E. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R03-OAR-2005-PA-
0006. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change, and may be made available online at
https://www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov
or e-mail. The EPA RME and the Federal regulations.gov Web sites are an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
RME index at https://www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either electronically in RME
or in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal
are available at the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street,
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LaKeshia Robertson, (215) 814-2113, or
by e-mail at robertson.lakeshia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Pursuant to sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f) of the CAA, the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the Commonwealth or Pennsylvania) is
required to establish and implement RACT for all major VOC and
NOX sources. The major source size is determined by its
location, the classification of that area and whether it is located in
the ozone transport region (OTR). Under section 184 of the CAA, RACT as
specified in sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f) applies throughout the OTR.
The entire Commonwealth is located within the OTR. Therefore, RACT is
applicable statewide in Pennsylvania.
State implementation plan revisions imposing RACT for three classes
of VOC sources are required under section 182(b)(2). The categories
are:
(1) All sources covered by a Control Technique Guideline (CTG)
document issued between November 15, 1990 and the date of attainment;
(2) All sources covered by a CTG issued prior to November 15, 1990;
and
(3) All major non-CTG sources.
The Pennsylvania SIP already has approved RACT regulations and
requirements for all sources and source categories covered by the CTGs.
The Pennsylvania SIP also has approved regulations to require major
sources of NOX and additional major sources of VOC emissions
(not covered by a CTG) to implement RACT. These regulations are
commonly termed the ``generic RACT regulations''. A generic RACT
regulation is one that does not, itself, specifically define RACT for a
source or source categories but instead establishes procedures for
imposing case-by-case RACT determinations. The Commonwealth's SIP-
approved generic RACT regulations consist of the procedures PADEP uses
to establish and impose RACT for subject sources of VOC and
NOX. Pursuant to the SIP-approved generic RACT rules, PADEP
imposes RACT on each subject source in an enforceable document, usually
a Plan Approval (PA) or Operating Permit (OP). The Commonwealth then
submits these PAs and OPs to EPA for approval as source-specific SIP
revisions.
On August 30, 2004, PADEP submitted revisions to the Pennsylvania
SIP which establish and impose RACT for three sources of VOC. The
Commonwealth's submittals consist of PAs and OPs which impose VOC RACT
requirements for each source.
II. Summary of the SIP Revisions
Copies of the actual PAs and OPs imposing RACT and PADEP's
evaluation memoranda are included in the electronic and hard copy
docket for this final rule. As previously stated, all documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the RME index at https://
www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or in hard copy during normal
business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are available at the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air
Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
17105. The table below identifies the sources and the individual PAs
and OPs which are the subject of this rulemaking.
[[Page 16719]]
Pennsylvania--VOC and NOX RACT Determinations for Individual Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan approval (PA
) ``Major
Source County operating permit Source type source''
(OP ) pollutant
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Salem Tube, Inc................ Mercer............ OP 43-142......... Five Reheat Furnaces VOC
and Trichloroethylene
Dipping Tank.
SGL Carbon Corporation......... Elk............... OP 24-131......... Flame Grids, Furnaces, VOC
and Special
Impregnation (resin).
Dominion Trans, Inc............ Clinton........... 18-00006.......... Four Salt Heaters, VOC
Natural Gas Boiler,
Two Hot Water
Heaters, Two Space
Heaters, and Three
Superior Boilers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA is approving these RACT SIP submittals because PADEP
established and imposed these RACT requirements in accordance with the
criteria set forth in its SIP-approved generic RACT regulations
applicable to these sources. The Commonwealth has also imposed record-
keeping, monitoring, and testing requirements on these sources
sufficient to determine compliance with the applicable RACT
determinations.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the revisions to the Pennsylvania SIP submitted by
PADEP to establish and require VOC RACT for three major of sources. EPA
is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the Agency views
this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse
comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal
Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are filed.
This rule will be effective on May 31, 2005 without further notice
unless EPA receives adverse comment by May 2, 2005. If EPA receives
adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. EPA
will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on
the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this
time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal
standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule
also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. Section 804 exempts from section 801 the following types
of rules: (1) Rules of particular applicability; (2) rules relating to
agency management or personnel; and (3) rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). EPA is not required
to submit a rule report regarding today's action under section 801
because this is a rule of particular applicability establishing source-
specific requirements for three named sources.
[[Page 16720]]
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 31, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
approving source-specific RACT requirements for three sources in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania does not affect the finality of this rule
for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within
which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See
section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ozone, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 24, 2005.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN--Pennsylvania
0
2. In Sec. 52.2020, the table in paragraph (d)(1) is amended by adding
the entries for Salem Tube, Inc., SGL Carbon Corporation, and Dominion
Trans, Inc. at the end of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional explanation/
Name of source Permit No. County State effective date EPA approval date Sec. 52.2063 citation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
SGL Carbon Corporation........... OP 24-131............ Elk.................. 5/12/95; 5/31/95.... 4/1/05, [Insert 52.2020(d)(1)(e).
page number where
the document
begins].
Salem Tube, Inc.................. OP 43-142............ Mercer............... 2/16/99............. [4/1/05, [Insert 52.2020(d)(1)(e).
page number where
the document
begins].
Dominion Trans, Inc.............. 18-0006.............. Clinton.............. 6/15/99; 9/29/03.... 4/1/05, [Insert 52.2020(d)(1)(e).
page number where
the document
begins].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-6378 Filed 3-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P