Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Extension of the Comment Period on Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher, 16474-16475 [05-6413]
Download as PDF
16474
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 61 / Thursday, March 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Have the Requirements for Approval of
a SIP Revision Been Met?
The state submittal has met the public
notice requirements for SIP submissions
in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The
submittal also satisfied the
completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51,
appendix V. In addition, as explained
above and in more detail in the TSD
which is part of this rule, the revision
meets the substantive SIP requirements
of the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
What Action Is EPA Taking?
We are proposing to approve as an
amendment to the Missouri SIP
amended rule 10 CSR 10–6.350,
‘‘Emissions Limitations and Emissions
Trading of Oxides of Nitrogen,’’
submitted to us on September 18, 2003.
We are soliciting comments on this
proposed action. Final rulemaking will
occur after consideration of any
comments.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this proposed
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and therefore is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This proposed action merely
proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and
imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies
that this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
proposes to approve pre-existing
requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable
duty beyond that required by state law,
it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This proposed rule also does not have
tribal implications because it will not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:50 Mar 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This proposed rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This proposed
rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: March 21, 2005.
James B. Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 05–6370 Filed 3–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018–AT88
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Extension of the Comment
Period on Proposed Designation of
Critical Habitat for the Southwestern
Willow Flycatcher
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
public comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
extension of the public comment period
for the proposal to designate critical
habitat for the southwestern willow
flycatcher (Empidonax extimus traillii)
to allow all interested parties to
comment on the proposed critical
habitat designation under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended. The proposed rule was
published and the public comment
period initially opened on October 12,
2004 (69 FR 60706). The comment
period was extended to March 31, 2005
(December 13, 2004; 69 FR 72161) and
is being extended again with this notice.
DATES: The deadline for submitting
comments on this proposal is extended
from March 31, 2005, to May 31, 2005.
Comments must be submitted directly to
the Service (see ADDRESSES section) on
or before May 31, 2005. Any comments
received after the closing date may not
be considered in the final determination
on the proposal.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment,
you may submit your comments and
materials by any one of several methods:
1. You may submit written comments
and information by mail or handdelivery to Steve Spangle, Field
Supervisor, Arizona Ecological Services
Field Office, 2321 W. Royal Palm Road,
Suite 103, Phoenix, Arizona 85021.
2. Written comments may be sent by
facsimile to (602) 242–2513.
3. You may send your comments by
electronic mail (e-mail) to
WIFLcomments@fws.gov.
The critical habitat proposal and
supporting maps are available for
viewing by appointment during regular
business hours at the above address or
on the Internet at https://
arizonaes.fws.gov/SWWF_PCH_Oct.htm.
All comments and materials received, as
well as supporting documentation used
in preparation of the proposed rule, will
be available for public inspection, by
E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM
31MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 61 / Thursday, March 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules
appointment, during normal business
hours at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor,
Arizona Ecological Services Office
(telephone 602–242–0210, facsimile
602–242–2513).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We proposed to designate for the
southwestern willow flycatcher 376,095
acres (ac) (152,124 hectares (ha))
[including approximately 1,556 stream
miles (2,508 stream kilometers)] of
critical habitat, which includes various
stream segments and their associated
riparian areas, not exceeding the 100year floodplain or flood prone area, on
a combination of Federal, State, Tribal,
and private lands in southern California,
southern Nevada, southwestern Utah,
south-central Colorado, Arizona, and
New Mexico. The proposed rule was
published in the Federal Register (69
FR 60706) on October 12, 2004,
pursuant to a court order.
On September 30, 2003, in a
complaint brought by the Center for
Biological Diversity, the U.S. District
Court of New Mexico instructed us to
propose critical habitat by September
30, 2004, and publish a final rule by
September 30, 2005. Additional
background information is available in
the October 12, 2004, proposal to
designate critical habitat.
Critical habitat identifies specific
areas that are essential to the
conservation of a listed species and that
may require special management
considerations or protection. If the
proposed rule is made final, section 7 of
the Act will prohibit adverse
modification of critical habitat by any
activity funded, authorized, or carried
out by any Federal agency. Federal
agencies proposing actions affecting
areas designated as critical habitat must
consult with us on the effects of their
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:50 Mar 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
proposed actions, pursuant to section
7(a)(2) of the Act.
Section 4 of the Act requires that we
consider economic and other relevant
impacts prior to making a final decision
on what areas to designate as critical
habitat. We are currently developing a
draft economic analysis and draft
environmental assessment for the
proposal to designate certain areas as
critical habitat for the southwestern
willow flycatcher and will announce
their availability at a later date. We may
revise the proposal, or its supporting
documents, to incorporate or address
new information received during the
comment period. In particular, we may
exclude an area from critical habitat if
we determine that the benefits of
excluding the area outweigh the benefits
of including the area as critical habitat,
provided such exclusion will not result
in the extinction of the species.
Pursuant to 50 CFR 424.16(c)(2), we
may extend or reopen a comment period
upon finding that there is good cause to
do so. We are currently developing a
draft economic analysis and draft
environmental assessment for the
proposal and will announce the
availability of those documents and
solicit data and comments from the
public on these draft documents at a
later date. We will also announce
hearing dates concurrently with the
availability of the draft documents.
However, it is our intention to leave the
public comment period open and
uninterrupted until those documents are
available for public consideration and
comment. We believe that allowing the
comment period to expire before the full
set of supporting draft analytical
documents is available could result in
hurried and incomplete comments on
our proposed rule and could also
unnecessarily frustrate respondents. We
deem these considerations as sufficient
cause to extend the comment period.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16475
We are required by court order to
complete the final designation of critical
habitat for the southwestern willow
flycatcher by September 30, 2005. To
meet this date, all comments on or
proposed revisions to the proposed rule
need to be submitted to us during the
comment period as extended by this
document (see DATES).
Our practice is to make comments,
including names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public review
during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that
we withhold their home address, which
we will honor to the extent allowable by
law. If you wish us to withhold your
name or address, you must state this
request prominently at the beginning of
your comments. However, we will not
consider anonymous comments. To the
extent consistent with applicable law,
we will make all submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Comments and materials received, as
well as supporting documentation used
in preparation of the proposal to
designate critical habitat, will be
available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at the Arizona Ecological Services
Office (see ADDRESSES section).
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: March 25, 2005.
Craig Manson,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. 05–6413 Filed 3–28–05; 3:51 pm]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM
31MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 61 (Thursday, March 31, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16474-16475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6413]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018-AT88
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Extension of the
Comment Period on Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for the
Southwestern Willow Flycatcher
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of public comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
extension of the public comment period for the proposal to designate
critical habitat for the southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax
extimus traillii) to allow all interested parties to comment on the
proposed critical habitat designation under the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended. The proposed rule was published and the public
comment period initially opened on October 12, 2004 (69 FR 60706). The
comment period was extended to March 31, 2005 (December 13, 2004; 69 FR
72161) and is being extended again with this notice.
DATES: The deadline for submitting comments on this proposal is
extended from March 31, 2005, to May 31, 2005. Comments must be
submitted directly to the Service (see ADDRESSES section) on or before
May 31, 2005. Any comments received after the closing date may not be
considered in the final determination on the proposal.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment, you may submit your comments and
materials by any one of several methods:
1. You may submit written comments and information by mail or hand-
delivery to Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor, Arizona Ecological
Services Field Office, 2321 W. Royal Palm Road, Suite 103, Phoenix,
Arizona 85021.
2. Written comments may be sent by facsimile to (602) 242-2513.
3. You may send your comments by electronic mail (e-mail) to
WIFLcomments@fws.gov.
The critical habitat proposal and supporting maps are available for
viewing by appointment during regular business hours at the above
address or on the Internet at https://arizonaes.fws.gov/SWWF_PCH_
Oct.htm. All comments and materials received, as well as supporting
documentation used in preparation of the proposed rule, will be
available for public inspection, by
[[Page 16475]]
appointment, during normal business hours at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor,
Arizona Ecological Services Office (telephone 602-242-0210, facsimile
602-242-2513).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We proposed to designate for the southwestern willow flycatcher
376,095 acres (ac) (152,124 hectares (ha)) [including approximately
1,556 stream miles (2,508 stream kilometers)] of critical habitat,
which includes various stream segments and their associated riparian
areas, not exceeding the 100-year floodplain or flood prone area, on a
combination of Federal, State, Tribal, and private lands in southern
California, southern Nevada, southwestern Utah, south-central Colorado,
Arizona, and New Mexico. The proposed rule was published in the Federal
Register (69 FR 60706) on October 12, 2004, pursuant to a court order.
On September 30, 2003, in a complaint brought by the Center for
Biological Diversity, the U.S. District Court of New Mexico instructed
us to propose critical habitat by September 30, 2004, and publish a
final rule by September 30, 2005. Additional background information is
available in the October 12, 2004, proposal to designate critical
habitat.
Critical habitat identifies specific areas that are essential to
the conservation of a listed species and that may require special
management considerations or protection. If the proposed rule is made
final, section 7 of the Act will prohibit adverse modification of
critical habitat by any activity funded, authorized, or carried out by
any Federal agency. Federal agencies proposing actions affecting areas
designated as critical habitat must consult with us on the effects of
their proposed actions, pursuant to section 7(a)(2) of the Act.
Section 4 of the Act requires that we consider economic and other
relevant impacts prior to making a final decision on what areas to
designate as critical habitat. We are currently developing a draft
economic analysis and draft environmental assessment for the proposal
to designate certain areas as critical habitat for the southwestern
willow flycatcher and will announce their availability at a later date.
We may revise the proposal, or its supporting documents, to incorporate
or address new information received during the comment period. In
particular, we may exclude an area from critical habitat if we
determine that the benefits of excluding the area outweigh the benefits
of including the area as critical habitat, provided such exclusion will
not result in the extinction of the species.
Pursuant to 50 CFR 424.16(c)(2), we may extend or reopen a comment
period upon finding that there is good cause to do so. We are currently
developing a draft economic analysis and draft environmental assessment
for the proposal and will announce the availability of those documents
and solicit data and comments from the public on these draft documents
at a later date. We will also announce hearing dates concurrently with
the availability of the draft documents. However, it is our intention
to leave the public comment period open and uninterrupted until those
documents are available for public consideration and comment. We
believe that allowing the comment period to expire before the full set
of supporting draft analytical documents is available could result in
hurried and incomplete comments on our proposed rule and could also
unnecessarily frustrate respondents. We deem these considerations as
sufficient cause to extend the comment period.
We are required by court order to complete the final designation of
critical habitat for the southwestern willow flycatcher by September
30, 2005. To meet this date, all comments on or proposed revisions to
the proposed rule need to be submitted to us during the comment period
as extended by this document (see DATES).
Our practice is to make comments, including names and home
addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular
business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold
their home address, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law.
If you wish us to withhold your name or address, you must state this
request prominently at the beginning of your comments. However, we will
not consider anonymous comments. To the extent consistent with
applicable law, we will make all submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Comments and materials received, as well as supporting
documentation used in preparation of the proposal to designate critical
habitat, will be available for public inspection, by appointment,
during normal business hours at the Arizona Ecological Services Office
(see ADDRESSES section).
Authority
The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: March 25, 2005.
Craig Manson,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 05-6413 Filed 3-28-05; 3:51 pm]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P