Guidance for Review Staff and Industry on Good Review Management Principles and Practices for Prescription Drug User Fee Act Products; Availability, 16507-16508 [05-6404]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 61 / Thursday, March 31, 2005 / Notices
16507
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
John
Jenkins, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research (HFD–020), Food and Drug
Administration, suite 7215, 5515
Security Lane, Rockville, MD 20852,
301–594–3937; or Robert A. Yetter,
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research (HFM–25), Food and Drug
Administration, 1451 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, MD 20852, 301–827–0373.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
application (BLA), or an efficacy
supplement under PDUFA.
The GRMPs in this guidance are based
on the collective experience of CDER
and CBER with review of applications
for PDUFA products and are intended to
promote efficient and consistent
management of application reviews. The
GRMPs also clarify roles and
responsibilities of review staff in
managing the review process and
identify ways in which NDA and BLA
applicants may further the effectiveness
and efficiency of the review process.
In the Federal Register of July 28,
2003 (68 FR 44345), FDA published a
notice announcing the availability of a
draft version of this guidance. FDA
received a number of comments when it
issued the draft version of this guidance.
We have considered the comments on
the draft guidance carefully and have
made some changes to address those
comments. The guidance has been
revised to clarify the principles on
which our current and developing
practices are based. We have also added
general internal timelines for important
milestones associated with the review
process.
The GRMPs also include the agency’s
current best practices, as well as goals
for review management improvements.
The GRMPs are an important
foundational component of FDA’s
program to more fully implement a
quality systems approach for the new
drug and biologics review and approval
process.
This guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the agency’s
current thinking on GRMPs for PDUFA
products. It does not create or confer
any rights for or on any person and does
not operate to bind FDA or the public.
An alternative approach may be used if
such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
Food and Drug Administration
I. Background
II. Comments
[Docket No. 2003D–0317] (formerly Docket
No. 03D–0317)
FDA is announcing the availability of
a guidance for review staff and industry
entitled ‘‘Good Review Management
Principles and Practices for PDUFA
Products.’’ In conjunction with the June
2002 reauthorization of PDUFA, FDA
agreed to meet specific performance
goals (PDUFA Goals). The PDUFA Goals
include providing guidance to industry
and review staff in CDER and CBER on
the good review management principles
and practices (GRMPs) for the conduct
of the first cycle review of a new drug
application (NDA), a biologics license
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments on the guidance at any time.
Two copies of mailed comments are to
be submitted, except that individuals
may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. The guidance and received
comments are available for public
examination in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
consistent with section 9 of the BPCA
(Public Law 107–109). Enacted on
January 4, 2002, the BPCA reauthorizes,
with certain important changes, the
pediatric exclusivity program described
in section 505A of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
355a). Section 505A permits certain
applications to obtain 6 months of
marketing exclusivity if, in accordance
with the requirements of the statute, the
sponsor submits requested information
relating to the use of the drug in the
pediatric population.
One of the provisions the BPCA
added to the pediatric exclusivity
program pertains to the dissemination of
pediatric information. Specifically, for
all pediatric supplements submitted
under the BPCA, the BPCA requires
FDA to make available to the public a
summary of the medical and clinical
pharmacology reviews of pediatric
studies conducted for the supplement
(21 U.S.C. 355a(m)(1)). The summaries
are to be made available not later than
180 days after the report on the
pediatric study is submitted to FDA (21
U.S.C. 355a(m)(1)). Consistent with this
provision of the BPCA, FDA has posted
on the Internet (https://www.fda.gov/
cder/pediatric/index.htm) summaries of
medical and clinical pharmacology
reviews of pediatric studies submitted
in supplements for AGRYLIN
(anagrelide), CLOLAR (clofarabine), and
DIFLUCAN (fluconazole). Copies are
also available by mail (see ADDRESSES).
II. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at https://
www.fda.gov/cder/pediatric/index.htm.
Dated: March 22, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–6332 Filed 3–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
Guidance for Review Staff and Industry
on Good Review Management
Principles and Practices for
Prescription Drug User Fee Act
Products; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:30 Mar 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
availability of a guidance for review
staff and industry entitled ‘‘Good
Review Management Principles and
Practices for PDUFA Products.’’ This is
one in a series of guidance documents
that FDA agreed to draft and implement
in conjunction with the June 2002
reauthorization of the Prescription Drug
User Fee Act of 1992 (PDUFA).
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on agency guidances at any
time.
Submit written requests for
single copies of this guidance to the
Division of Drug Information (HFD–
240), Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research (CDER), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, or the Office of
Communications, Training, and
Manufacturers Assistance (HFM–40),
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research (CBER), 1401 Rockville Pike,
Food and Drug Administration,
Rockville, MD 20852–1448. Send one
self-addressed adhesive label to assist
that office in processing your requests.
Submit written comments on the
guidance to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. The
guidance may also be obtained from
CBER by mail by calling 1–800–835–
4709, or 301–827–1800. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for electronic access to the guidance
document.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
16508
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 61 / Thursday, March 31, 2005 / Notices
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at https://
www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm,
https://www.fda.gov/cber/
guidelines.htm, or https://www.fda.gov/
ohrms/dockets/default.htm.
Dated: March 25, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–6404 Filed 3–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection:
Comment Request
In compliance with the requirement
for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects
(section 3506(c)(2)(A) of Title 44, United
States Code, as amended by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub.
L. 104–13), the Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA)
publishes periodic summaries of
proposed projects being developed for
submission to the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. To request more
information on the proposed project or
to obtain a copy of the data collection
plans and draft instruments, call the
HRSA Reports Clearance Officer on
(301) 443–1129.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
the Agency’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
Number of
respondents
Form
Responses per
respondent
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Health Education
Assistance Loan (HEAL) Program:
Lender’s Application for Insurance
Claim Form and Request for Collection
Assistance Form (OMB No. 0915–
0036)—Extension
The HEAL program assures the
availability of funds for loans to eligible
students who desire to borrow money to
pay for their educational costs. HEAL
Lenders use the Lenders Application for
Insurance Claim to request payment
from the Federal Government for
federally insured loans lost due to
borrowers death, disability, bankruptcy,
or default. The Request for Collection
Assistance form is used by HEAL
lenders to request federal assistance
with the collection of delinquent
payments from HEAL borrowers.
The burden estimates are as follows:
Total
responses
Hours per
response
(minutes)
Total
burden hours
Lender’s Application for Insurance Claim ..........................
Request for Collection Assistance .....................................
20
20
75
1,260
1,500
25,200
30
10
750
4,208
Total ............................................................................
20
..........................
........................
........................
4,958
Send comments to Susan G. Queen,
Ph.D., HRSA Reports Clearance Officer,
Room 10–33, Parklawn Building, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.
Written comments should be received
within 60 days of this notice.
Dated: March 25, 2005.
Tina Cheatham,
Director, Division of Policy Review and
Coordination.
[FR Doc. 05–6354 Filed 3–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[DHS–2005–0025]
Directorate of Information Analysis
and Infrastructure Protection (IAIP);
Open Meeting of National
Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC)
Directorate of Information
Analysis and Infrastructure Protection.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Infrastructure
Advisory Council (NIAC) will meet on
Tuesday, April 12, 2005, from 1:30 p.m.
to 4:30 p.m. at the National Press Club
in Washington, DC. The meeting will be
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:30 Mar 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
open to the public. Limited seating will
be available. Reservations are not
accepted. The NIAC advises the
President of the United States on the
security of critical infrastructures which
include banking and finance,
transportation, energy, manufacturing,
and emergency government services. At
this meeting, the NIAC will be briefed
on the status of several Working Group
activities in which the Council is
currently engaged.
DATES: The NIAC will meet Tuesday,
April 12, 2005, from 1:30 p.m. to 4:30
p.m.
ADDRESSES: The NIAC will meet at the
National Press Club, 529 14th Street,
NW., Washington, DC. You may submit
comments, identified by DHS Docket
DHS–2005–0025 by one of the following
methods:
• EPA Federal Partner EDOCKET Web
site: https://www.epa.gov/feddocket.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the Web site.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
Department of Homeland Security, Attn:
Ms. Nancy J. Wong, Infrastructure
Coordination Division, Directorate of
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Information Analysis and Infrastructure
Protection/703–235–5352, Anacostia
Naval Annex, 245 Murray Lane, SW.,
Building 410, Washington, DC 20582,
7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the DFHS–2005–0025. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.epa.gov/
feddocket, including any personal
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy J. Wong, NIAC Designated
Federal Official, telephone 703–235–
5352.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of
these meetings is given under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5
U.S.C. App. 2.
Draft Agenda of Committee Meeting on
April 12, 2005:
I. Opening of Meeting
Nancy J. Wong, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security (DHS)/
Designated Federal Official, NIAC
II. Roll Call of Members
Nancy J. Wong
III. Opening Remarks and Introductions
NIAC Chairman, Erle A. Nye,
Chairman of the Board, TXU Corp.
NIAC Vice Chairman, John T.
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 61 (Thursday, March 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16507-16508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6404]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2003D-0317] (formerly Docket No. 03D-0317)
Guidance for Review Staff and Industry on Good Review Management
Principles and Practices for Prescription Drug User Fee Act Products;
Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance for review staff and industry entitled
``Good Review Management Principles and Practices for PDUFA Products.''
This is one in a series of guidance documents that FDA agreed to draft
and implement in conjunction with the June 2002 reauthorization of the
Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 (PDUFA).
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on agency guidances at
any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance
to the Division of Drug Information (HFD-240), Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER), Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, or the Office of Communications,
Training, and Manufacturers Assistance (HFM-40), Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER), 1401 Rockville Pike, Food and Drug
Administration, Rockville, MD 20852-1448. Send one self-addressed
adhesive label to assist that office in processing your requests.
Submit written comments on the guidance to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. The guidance may also be obtained from
CBER by mail by calling 1-800-835-4709, or 301-827-1800. Submit
electronic comments to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Jenkins, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (HFD-020), Food and Drug Administration, suite
7215, 5515 Security Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-594-3937; or Robert
A. Yetter, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-25), Food
and Drug Administration, 1451 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-
827-0373.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for review staff
and industry entitled ``Good Review Management Principles and Practices
for PDUFA Products.'' In conjunction with the June 2002 reauthorization
of PDUFA, FDA agreed to meet specific performance goals (PDUFA Goals).
The PDUFA Goals include providing guidance to industry and review staff
in CDER and CBER on the good review management principles and practices
(GRMPs) for the conduct of the first cycle review of a new drug
application (NDA), a biologics license application (BLA), or an
efficacy supplement under PDUFA.
The GRMPs in this guidance are based on the collective experience
of CDER and CBER with review of applications for PDUFA products and are
intended to promote efficient and consistent management of application
reviews. The GRMPs also clarify roles and responsibilities of review
staff in managing the review process and identify ways in which NDA and
BLA applicants may further the effectiveness and efficiency of the
review process.
In the Federal Register of July 28, 2003 (68 FR 44345), FDA
published a notice announcing the availability of a draft version of
this guidance. FDA received a number of comments when it issued the
draft version of this guidance. We have considered the comments on the
draft guidance carefully and have made some changes to address those
comments. The guidance has been revised to clarify the principles on
which our current and developing practices are based. We have also
added general internal timelines for important milestones associated
with the review process.
The GRMPs also include the agency's current best practices, as well
as goals for review management improvements. The GRMPs are an important
foundational component of FDA's program to more fully implement a
quality systems approach for the new drug and biologics review and
approval process.
This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
agency's current thinking on GRMPs for PDUFA products. It does not
create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate
to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such
approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and
regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments on the guidance at any
time. Two copies of mailed comments are to be submitted, except that
individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. The
guidance and received comments are available for public examination in
the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
[[Page 16508]]
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
https://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm, https://www.fda.gov/cber/
guidelines.htm, or https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm.
Dated: March 25, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-6404 Filed 3-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S