Information Collection Renewal Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Approval Under the Paperwork Reduction Act; OMB Control Number 1018-0103, Conservation Order for Control of Mid-Continent Light Geese, 50 CFR 21.60, 16512-16513 [05-6380]

Download as PDF 16512 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 61 / Thursday, March 31, 2005 / Notices from other offices participated in its development. Dated: March 28, 2005. Robert C. Bonner, Commissioner, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection. [FR Doc. 05–6398 Filed 3–30–05; 8:45 am] Dated: March 25, 2005. Jayson P. Ahern, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations. [FR Doc. 05–6396 Filed 3–30–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4820–02–P BILLING CODE 4820–02–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Bureau of Customs and Border Protection Tuna—Tariff-Rate Quota The tariff-rate quota for Calendar Year 2005, on tuna classifiable under subheading 1604.14.22, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. Announcement of the quota quantity of tuna in airtight containers for Calendar Year 2005. ACTION: SUMMARY: Each year the tariff-rate quota for tuna described in subheading 1604.14.22, HTSUS, is based on the apparent United States consumption of tuna in airtight containers during the preceding Calendar Year. This document sets forth the tariff-rate quota for Calendar Year 2005. Effective Dates: The 2005 tariffrate quota is applicable to tuna entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption during the period January 1, through December 31, 2005. DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Connie Chancey, Chief, Quota Branch, Textile Enforcement and Operations Division, Trade Compliance and Facilitation, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 344–2650. It has now been determined that 19,034,563 kilograms of tuna in air-tight containers may be entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption during the Calendar Year 2005, at the rate of 6 percent ad valorem under subheading 1604.14.22, HTSUS. Any such tuna which is entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption during the current calendar year in excess of this quota will be dutiable at the rate of 12.5 percent ad valorem under subheading 1604.14.30 HTSUS. BACKGROUND: VerDate jul<14>2003 15:30 Mar 30, 2005 Jkt 205001 Information Collection Renewal Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Approval Under the Paperwork Reduction Act; OMB Control Number 1018–0103, Conservation Order for Control of MidContinent Light Geese, 50 CFR 21.60 Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The number of mid-continent light geese (MCLG) has increased exponentially over the past several decades in prairie Canada and the midwestern United States, primarily due to (1) the expansion of agriculture and concurrent increase in food supply, (2) a decline in adult mortality, and (3) an increase in winter survival. These rapidly expanding populations have placed unprecedented pressure on arctic and subarctic breeding habitats. Prior to implementation of the conservation order, we (Fish and Wildlife Service) attempted to curb the growth rate of MCLG populations by liberalizing bag limits and increasing the light goose hunting season to 107 days, the maximum allowed by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, as amended. Although these changes resulted in increased harvest, the harvest rate (percent of population harvested) continued to decline as populations grew exponentially. Clearly, traditional wildlife management strategies were not working. Therefore, we created the conservation order, which authorizes States and tribes to implement population control measures without having to obtain a permit, thus significantly reducing their administrative burden. The States and tribes may conduct a population reduction program under the authority of the conservation order within the conditions provided by the Service. We have submitted the collection of information pertaining to the conservation order (described below) to OMB for approval under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: You must submit comments on or before May 2, 2005. PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Send your comments and suggestions on this information collection renewal to the Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior at OMB–OIRA at (202) 395–6566 (fax) or OIRA_DOCKET@OMB.eop.gov (e-mail). Please provide a copy of your comments to Hope Grey, Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service, MS 222–ARLSQ, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203 (mail); (703) 358–2269 (fax); or hope_grey@fws.gov (e-mail). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request a copy of the information collection request or explanatory information, contact Hope Grey at the above addresses or by phone at (703) 358–2482. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We have submitted a request to OMB to renew approval of information collection requirements for the Conservation Order for Control of Mid-Continent Light Geese. Currently, we have approval from OMB to collect information under OMB control number 1018–0103. This approval expires on March 31, 2005. We may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless we display a currently valid OMB control number. OMB regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which implement provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), require that interested members of the public and affected agencies have an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping activities (see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)). Following our submittal, OMB has up to 60 days to approve or disapprove our information collection request; however, OMB may make its decision as early as 30 days after our submittal. Therefore, to ensure that your comments receive consideration, send your comments and suggestions to OMB by the date listed in the DATES section. On November 15, 2004, we published in the Federal Register (69 FR 65627) a 60-day notice of our intent to request renewal of information collection authority from OMB. In that notice, we solicited public comments for 60 days, ending on January 14, 2005. We did not receive any comments. Lesser snow and Ross’ geese are referred to as ‘‘light’’ geese because of their light coloration as opposed to ‘‘dark’’ geese such as white-fronted or Canada Geese. The number of light geese in the mid-continent region has nearly quadrupled during the past several decades. Feeding activity of light geese seriously injures their habitat and habitat important to other migratory birds, which poses a serious threat to ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM 31MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 61 / Thursday, March 31, 2005 / Notices the short- and long-term health and status of some migratory bird populations. We believe that the number of light geese in the midcontinent region has exceeded long-term sustainable levels for their arctic and subarctic breeding habitats and the populations must be reduced. Authority for managing overabundant midcontinent light geese is contained in 50 CFR 21. For management purposes, light geese found in the mid-continent region are separated into two different populations. Lesser snow and Ross’ geese that primarily migrate through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, and Missouri, and winter in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and eastern, central, and southern Texas and other Gulf States are referred to as the mid-continent population of light geese. Lesser snow and Ross’ geese that primarily migrate through Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado and winter in New Mexico, northwestern Texas, and Chihuahua, Mexico are referred to as the western central flyway population of light geese. States and tribes that participate in the light geese conservation order must inform and brief all participants on the requirements in 50 CFR 21.60 and conservation order conditions that apply to implementation of light geese control measures. Participating States/ tribes must collect information on the number of birds taken during control efforts, the methods by which they are taken, and the dates on which they are taken. We use this information to administer the conservation order and, particularly, to monitor the effectiveness of control strategies and to protect migratory birds. Each participating State must submit an annual report by August 30 of each year summarizing the activities it conducted. We contacted some participating States to estimate burden hours for this information collection. Title of Collection: Conservation Order for Control of Mid-Continent Light Geese, 50 CFR 21.60. OMB Control Number: 1018–0103. Form Number: None. Frequency of Collection: Annually. Description of Respondents: States and tribes participating in the conservation order. Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,776. Total Annual Responses: 24. We invite comments concerning this submission on (1) whether or not the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of our migratory bird management functions, including whether or not the information will have practical utility; VerDate jul<14>2003 15:30 Mar 30, 2005 Jkt 205001 (2) the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the collection of information; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents. The information collections in this program are part of a system of records covered by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552 (a)). Dated: March 2, 2005. Hope Grey, Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. 05–6380 Filed 3–30–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Indian Affairs Office of Federal Acknowledgment; Reports and Guidance Documents; Availability, etc. Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Department gives notice that the Associate Deputy Secretary of the Interior is revising and clarifying certain internal procedures for managing and processing petitions for Federal acknowledgment as an Indian tribe. These revisions do not change the acknowledgment regulations, 25 CFR part 83. DATES: Effective Date: The procedures defined by this notice are effective on March 31, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Lee Fleming, Director, Office of Federal Acknowledgment, MS: 34B–SIB, 1951 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20240, phone (202) 513–7650. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Introduction The Department publishes this notice in the exercise of authority under 43 U.S.C. 1457, 25 U.S.C. 2 and 9, 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 5 U.S.C. 301, and under the exercise of authority which the Secretary of the Interior delegated to the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs (Assistant Secretary) by 209 Department Manual 8. This notice supersedes the notice published in the Federal Register (65 FR 7052) on February 11, 2000, entitled ‘‘Changes in the Internal Processing of Federal Acknowledgment Petitions.’’ By Secretary’s Order No. 3259, dated February 8, 2005, the Secretary delegated to the Associate Deputy Secretary most of the duties formerly delegated to the Assistant Secretary. PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 16513 (This delegation will expire upon confirmation of a new Assistant Secretary or designation of an Acting Assistant Secretary.) Among the delegated authorities is the authority to, ‘‘execute all documents, including regulations and other Federal Register notices, and perform all other duties relating to Federal recognition of Native American Tribes.’’ The acknowledgment process is based on the regulations in 25 CFR Part 83, first issued in 1978 and revised in 1994. The acknowledgment function, formerly under the Branch of Acknowledgment and Research in the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), was relocated to the Office of Federal Acknowledgment in the Office of the Assistant Secretary— Indian Affairs effective July 27, 2003. The General Accounting Office (now the Government Accountability Office) published on November 2001 a report entitled ‘‘Improvements Needed in Tribal Recognition Process.’’ In response to this report, the Department adopted a Strategic Plan, dated September 12, 2002, to identify ways to improve the timeliness and transparency of the acknowledgment process. That plan called for consideration of possible changes in the processing of acknowledgment petitions. This notice presents some of the results of that planning process. As part of its plan, the Department also provided for a review of a notice of ‘‘Changes in the Internal Processing of Federal Acknowledgment Petitions’’ published by the Assistant Secretary in the Federal Register (65 FR 7052) on February 11, 2000. In that notice, the Assistant Secretary changed certain internal procedures and clarified other procedures, within the parameters of the regulations. That notice directed BIA to adopt certain procedural changes in order to reduce delays in reviewing petitions for acknowledgment and to make acknowledgment decisions in a more timely manner. This notice supersedes the notice of February 11, 2000. The procedures described in this notice are based on five years of experience under the notice of February 11, 2000, and on the procedures that have been found most effective in producing the clearest decisions in an efficient manner, while giving petitioners and third parties appropriate opportunities to provide information and comment. These procedures are in accord with the commitment to the principle, stated by the Secretary in her April 1, 2004, memorandum to the Assistant Secretary, that acknowledgment decisions be based on documentation ‘‘carefully reviewed in E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM 31MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 61 (Thursday, March 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16512-16513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6380]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Information Collection Renewal Submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for Approval Under the Paperwork Reduction 
Act; OMB Control Number 1018-0103, Conservation Order for Control of 
Mid-Continent Light Geese, 50 CFR 21.60

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The number of mid-continent light geese (MCLG) has increased 
exponentially over the past several decades in prairie Canada and the 
midwestern United States, primarily due to (1) the expansion of 
agriculture and concurrent increase in food supply, (2) a decline in 
adult mortality, and (3) an increase in winter survival. These rapidly 
expanding populations have placed unprecedented pressure on arctic and 
subarctic breeding habitats. Prior to implementation of the 
conservation order, we (Fish and Wildlife Service) attempted to curb 
the growth rate of MCLG populations by liberalizing bag limits and 
increasing the light goose hunting season to 107 days, the maximum 
allowed by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, as amended. Although these 
changes resulted in increased harvest, the harvest rate (percent of 
population harvested) continued to decline as populations grew 
exponentially. Clearly, traditional wildlife management strategies were 
not working. Therefore, we created the conservation order, which 
authorizes States and tribes to implement population control measures 
without having to obtain a permit, thus significantly reducing their 
administrative burden. The States and tribes may conduct a population 
reduction program under the authority of the conservation order within 
the conditions provided by the Service. We have submitted the 
collection of information pertaining to the conservation order 
(described below) to OMB for approval under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: You must submit comments on or before May 2, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Send your comments and suggestions on this information 
collection renewal to the Desk Officer for the Department of the 
Interior at OMB-OIRA at (202) 395-6566 (fax) or OIRA--
DOCKET@OMB.eop.gov (e-mail). Please provide a copy of your comments to 
Hope Grey, Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife 
Service, MS 222-ARLSQ, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203 
(mail); (703) 358-2269 (fax); or hope_grey@fws.gov (e-mail).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request a copy of the information 
collection request or explanatory information, contact Hope Grey at the 
above addresses or by phone at (703) 358-2482.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We have submitted a request to OMB to renew 
approval of information collection requirements for the Conservation 
Order for Control of Mid-Continent Light Geese. Currently, we have 
approval from OMB to collect information under OMB control number 1018-
0103. This approval expires on March 31, 2005. We may not conduct or 
sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of 
information unless we display a currently valid OMB control number. OMB 
regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which implement provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), require that interested 
members of the public and affected agencies have an opportunity to 
comment on information collection and recordkeeping activities (see 5 
CFR 1320.8(d)). Following our submittal, OMB has up to 60 days to 
approve or disapprove our information collection request; however, OMB 
may make its decision as early as 30 days after our submittal. 
Therefore, to ensure that your comments receive consideration, send 
your comments and suggestions to OMB by the date listed in the DATES 
section.
    On November 15, 2004, we published in the Federal Register (69 FR 
65627) a 60-day notice of our intent to request renewal of information 
collection authority from OMB. In that notice, we solicited public 
comments for 60 days, ending on January 14, 2005. We did not receive 
any comments.
    Lesser snow and Ross' geese are referred to as ``light'' geese 
because of their light coloration as opposed to ``dark'' geese such as 
white-fronted or Canada Geese. The number of light geese in the mid-
continent region has nearly quadrupled during the past several decades. 
Feeding activity of light geese seriously injures their habitat and 
habitat important to other migratory birds, which poses a serious 
threat to

[[Page 16513]]

the short- and long-term health and status of some migratory bird 
populations. We believe that the number of light geese in the mid-
continent region has exceeded long-term sustainable levels for their 
arctic and subarctic breeding habitats and the populations must be 
reduced. Authority for managing overabundant mid-continent light geese 
is contained in 50 CFR 21.
    For management purposes, light geese found in the mid-continent 
region are separated into two different populations. Lesser snow and 
Ross' geese that primarily migrate through North Dakota, South Dakota, 
Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, and Missouri, and winter in Arkansas, 
Louisiana, Mississippi, and eastern, central, and southern Texas and 
other Gulf States are referred to as the mid-continent population of 
light geese. Lesser snow and Ross' geese that primarily migrate through 
Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado and winter in New Mexico, northwestern 
Texas, and Chihuahua, Mexico are referred to as the western central 
flyway population of light geese.
    States and tribes that participate in the light geese conservation 
order must inform and brief all participants on the requirements in 50 
CFR 21.60 and conservation order conditions that apply to 
implementation of light geese control measures. Participating States/
tribes must collect information on the number of birds taken during 
control efforts, the methods by which they are taken, and the dates on 
which they are taken. We use this information to administer the 
conservation order and, particularly, to monitor the effectiveness of 
control strategies and to protect migratory birds. Each participating 
State must submit an annual report by August 30 of each year 
summarizing the activities it conducted. We contacted some 
participating States to estimate burden hours for this information 
collection.
    Title of Collection: Conservation Order for Control of Mid-
Continent Light Geese, 50 CFR 21.60.
    OMB Control Number: 1018-0103.
    Form Number: None.
    Frequency of Collection: Annually.
    Description of Respondents: States and tribes participating in the 
conservation order.
    Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,776.
    Total Annual Responses: 24.
    We invite comments concerning this submission on (1) whether or not 
the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance 
of our migratory bird management functions, including whether or not 
the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of our 
estimate of the burden of the collection of information; (3) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents. The information collections in this program 
are part of a system of records covered by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 
552 (a)).

    Dated: March 2, 2005.
Hope Grey,
Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 05-6380 Filed 3-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.