Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request, 16548-16549 [05-6346]
Download as PDF
16548
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 61 / Thursday, March 31, 2005 / Notices
unable to consider approval of these
FIRC programs due to standing policy.
However, it has become apparent that
existing FAA policy does not best serve
the flight training community.
Accordingly, that policy is hereby
rescinded.
The FAA encourages training
providers who wish to develop new
FIRC programs to contact the AFS–800
organization for further details
concerning the approval process. These
same providers should also familiarize
themselves with the contents of AC61–
83E, as well as Volumes 1–3 of the
FAA/Industry Training Standards
(FITS) and System Safety training
documents located on the FAA’s Web
site at https://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/FITS/
training.cfm.
This notice is filed under 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(8). If it contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 34675, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 1925
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, a copy of each
pleading must be served on Sarah W.
Bailiff, 2500 Lou Menk Drive, P.O. Box
961039, Fort Worth, TX 76161–0039.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at ‘‘https://
www.stb.dot.gov.’’
Issued in Washington DC on March 28,
2005.
Robert A. Wright,
Manager, General Aviation and Commercial
Division.
[FR Doc. 05–6387 Filed 3–30–05; 8:45 am]
Decided: March 23, 2005.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–6130 Filed 3–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Surface Transportation Board
BILLING CODE 4810–35–P
BNSF Railway Company—Temporary
Trackage Rights Exemption—The
Kansas City Southern Railway
Company
The Kansas City Southern Railway
Company (KCS) has agreed to grant
temporary overhead trackage rights to
BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) over
KCS’s rail line between Jefferson, TX,
and Metro, TX, a distance of
approximately 200.9 miles.
The transaction was scheduled to be
consummated on March 23, 2005, and
the temporary trackage rights are
intended to expire on May 20, 2005. The
purpose of the temporary trackage rights
is to allow BNSF to bridge its train
service while its main lines are out of
service due to programmed track,
roadbed, and structural maintenance.
As a condition to this exemption, any
employee affected by the acquisition of
the temporary trackage rights will be
protected by the conditions imposed in
Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.—Trackage
Rights—BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.—
Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653
(1980), and any employee affected by
the discontinuance of those trackage
rights will be protected by the
conditions set out in Oregon Short Line
R. Co.—Abandonment—Goshen, 360
I.C.C. 91 (1979).
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
[STB Finance Docket No. 34675]
15:30 Mar 30, 2005
Christopher L. Davis,
Treasury PRA Assistant.
[FR Doc. 05–6365 Filed 3–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
VerDate jul<14>2003
Respondents: Federal Government,
State, Local, or Tribal Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
56.
Estimated Burden Hours Per
Respondent: 403 Hours.
Frequency of Response:
Recordkeeping Annually.
Estimated Total Reporting Burden:
22,579 Hours.
Clearance Officer: Jiovannah L. Diggs,
(202) 874–7662, Financial Management
Service, Administrative Programs
Division, Records and Information
Management Program, 3700 East West
Highway, Room 144, Hyattsville, MD
20782.
OMB Reviewer: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr.,
(202) 395–7316, Office of Management
and Budget, Room 10235, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503.
March 28, 2005.
The Department of the Treasury has
submitted the following public
information collection requirement(s) to
OMB for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Copies of the
submission(s) may be obtained by
calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance
Officer listed. Comments regarding this
information collection should be
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed
and to the Treasury Department
Clearance Officer, Department of the
Treasury, Room 11000,1750
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20220.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before May 2, 2005 to be
assured of consideration.
Financial Management Service (FMS)
OMB Number: 1510–0061.
Regulation Number: PL–101–453.
Type of Review: Extension.
Title: ‘‘CMIA’’ Annual Report and
Interest Calculation Cost Claims.
Description: PL 101–453 requires that
States and Territories must report
interest liabilities for major Federal
assistant programs annually. States and
Territories may report interest
calculation cost claims for
compensation of administrative costs.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of the
Treasury, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the public
and other Federal agencies to comment
on proposed and continuing
information collections, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Currently, we
are seeking comments on the TTB
Questionnaire titled ‘‘Methanol Levels &
Good Manufacturing Practices for Fruit
Brandies.’’
DATES: We must receive your written
comments on or before May 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments to
Jeffrey A. Salisbury, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, at any
of these addresses:
• P.O. Box 14412, Washington, DC
20044–4412;
• 202–927–8525 (facsimile); or
• formcomments@ttb.gov (e-mail).
Please reference the information
collection’s title in your comment. If
you submit your comment via facsimile,
send no more than five 8.5 x 11 inch
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 61 / Thursday, March 31, 2005 / Notices
pages in order to ensure electronic
access to our equipment.
To
obtain additional information, copies of
the information collection and its
instructions, or copies of any comments
received, contact Jeffrey A. Salisbury,
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau, P.O. Box 14412, Washington,
DC 20044–4412; or telephone 202–927–
1188.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Methanol Levels & Good
Manufacturing Practices for Fruit
Brandies.
OMB Number: To be assigned.
Abstract: TTB has authority under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, Title 26
U.S.C., and the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 201 et seq., over distilled spirits,
wines, and malt beverage products.
Section 105 of the FAA Act provides
TTB with the authority to promulgate
regulations regarding the labeling and
advertising of alcohol beverages to
provide consumers with adequate
information concerning the identity and
quality of such products.
TTB is proposing a voluntary
collection of information from fruit
brandy producers and importers to
identify good manufacturing practices
used in producing fruit brandies. Under
the Memorandum of Understanding
Between the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (TTB’s
predecessor agency), 52 FR 45502,
November 30, 1987 (MOU), (still in
force after the Homeland Security Act of
2002, which established TTB), TTB is
responsible for testing alcohol beverages
for the presence of substances, which if
detected, may make the product
adulterated under the Federal Food,
Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, as
amended, 21 U.S.C. 301, et seq. (FD &
C Act). TTB may in certain instances
seek a ‘‘health hazard evaluation’’ from
FDA to determine if a particular alcohol
beverage is adulterated under the FD &
C Act. As a result of FDA’s
recommendations, TTB may take
enforcement action against importers
and manufacturers in cases involving
adulterated alcohol beverages based
upon violations of TTB laws.
With regard to methanol and fruit
brandy specifically, FDA is responsible
for issuing guidance on the safe level of
methanol in fruit brandy marketed to
consumers, while TTB is responsible for
testing the level of methanol in fruit
brandy to determine if it is adulterated
under the FD & C Act. FDA is
considering revising the maximum
permitted level of methanol in fruit
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:30 Mar 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
brandy, which is currently 0.35% by
volume. Consequently, FDA is also
considering revising or replacing their
current guidance on fruit brandy (see
Compliance Policy Guide (CPG)
7119.09, October 1, 1980). As part of
this effort, FDA has requested TTB’s
assistance to identify current
manufacturing practices in the
production of brandy. Based on the
information obtained in the survey, FDA
may identify good manufacturing
practices used to make fruit brandies
and utilize such information in
developing guidance for industry.
Accordingly, responses to the
following questions will provide TTB
with the required information to
identify good manufacturing practices
in the making of fruit brandy.
Questionnaire
1. Where is your distilled spirits
plant(s) located?
2. On average, how much fruit
brandy, by volume, do you produce in
one year? (If you produce brandy from
more than one fruit, please provide a
breakdown of production volume by
each type of fruit).
3. What percentage of fruit brandy
produced by you is sold in the United
States? (If you produce brandy from
more than one fruit, please provide a
breakdown of production volume by
each type of fruit).
4. From what geographic location do
you obtain the fruit used in the
production of your fruit brandies?
5. What quality control procedures do
you have in place regarding the fruit
used in your brandy production? (i.e.
inspections, age of fruit, condition
requirements, washing, etc.)
6. How do you prepare the fruit to
create the mash for fermentation?
7. Do you use any additional enzymes
in the mash to aid in the fermentation?
If so, please describe the specific
enzymes that you are using.
8. Please describe the type of still you
use in the production of your fruit
brandies. (e.g. Pot, Alembic, Pot
Rectified, Armagnac, Continuous,
Other).
9. What is the degree of proof of your
fruit brandies at distillation, before
dilution and bottling?
10. In the case of brandies produced
by pot still, what is the composite proof
at distillation?
11. What is the heads/tails cutoff
distillation and how do you determine
the cutoff points?
12. What is your process for diluting
the distillate in order to adjust the proof
for bottling?
13. What is the proof of your finished
product after bottling?
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16549
14. Are your fruit brandies aged
before bottling? If yes, please describe
the aging process and the aging period.
Also, please indicate the proof of the
product before and after aging.
15. What quality control practices do
you use, other than those previously
mentioned, to control the level of
methanol in your finished fruit
brandies?
16. Do you monitor the level of
methanol in your fruit brandies? If you
do monitor the level of methanol,
describe your monitoring process and
provide data on methanol levels for the
past 3 years.
Current Actions: New information
collection.
Type of Review: Regular.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
43.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 91.75.
Request for Comments
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be included or
summarized in our request for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval of this information collection.
All comments are part of the public
record and subject to disclosure. Please
do not include any confidential or
inappropriate material in your
comments.
We invite comments on: (a) Whether
this information collection is necessary
for the proper performance of the
agency’s functions, including whether
the information has practical utility; (b)
the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of
the information collection’s burden; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; (d)
ways to minimize the information
collection’s burden on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (e)
estimates of capital or start-up costs and
costs of operation, maintenance, and
purchase of services to provide the
requested information.
Dated: March 25, 2005.
William H. Foster,
Chief, Regulations and Procedures Division.
[FR Doc. 05–6346 Filed 3–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 61 (Thursday, March 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16548-16549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6346]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the public and other Federal agencies to
comment on proposed and continuing information collections, as required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Currently, we are seeking comments on the TTB Questionnaire titled
``Methanol Levels & Good Manufacturing Practices for Fruit Brandies.''
DATES: We must receive your written comments on or before May 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments to Jeffrey A. Salisbury, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, at any of these addresses:
P.O. Box 14412, Washington, DC 20044-4412;
202-927-8525 (facsimile); or
formcomments@ttb.gov (e-mail).
Please reference the information collection's title in your
comment. If you submit your comment via facsimile, send no more than
five 8.5 x 11 inch
[[Page 16549]]
pages in order to ensure electronic access to our equipment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To obtain additional information,
copies of the information collection and its instructions, or copies of
any comments received, contact Jeffrey A. Salisbury, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, P.O. Box 14412, Washington, DC 20044-
4412; or telephone 202-927-1188.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Methanol Levels & Good Manufacturing Practices for Fruit
Brandies.
OMB Number: To be assigned.
Abstract: TTB has authority under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, Title 26 U.S.C., and the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA
Act), 27 U.S.C. 201 et seq., over distilled spirits, wines, and malt
beverage products. Section 105 of the FAA Act provides TTB with the
authority to promulgate regulations regarding the labeling and
advertising of alcohol beverages to provide consumers with adequate
information concerning the identity and quality of such products.
TTB is proposing a voluntary collection of information from fruit
brandy producers and importers to identify good manufacturing practices
used in producing fruit brandies. Under the Memorandum of Understanding
Between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (TTB's predecessor agency), 52 FR 45502,
November 30, 1987 (MOU), (still in force after the Homeland Security
Act of 2002, which established TTB), TTB is responsible for testing
alcohol beverages for the presence of substances, which if detected,
may make the product adulterated under the Federal Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act of 1938, as amended, 21 U.S.C. 301, et seq. (FD & C Act).
TTB may in certain instances seek a ``health hazard evaluation'' from
FDA to determine if a particular alcohol beverage is adulterated under
the FD & C Act. As a result of FDA's recommendations, TTB may take
enforcement action against importers and manufacturers in cases
involving adulterated alcohol beverages based upon violations of TTB
laws.
With regard to methanol and fruit brandy specifically, FDA is
responsible for issuing guidance on the safe level of methanol in fruit
brandy marketed to consumers, while TTB is responsible for testing the
level of methanol in fruit brandy to determine if it is adulterated
under the FD & C Act. FDA is considering revising the maximum permitted
level of methanol in fruit brandy, which is currently 0.35% by volume.
Consequently, FDA is also considering revising or replacing their
current guidance on fruit brandy (see Compliance Policy Guide (CPG)
7119.09, October 1, 1980). As part of this effort, FDA has requested
TTB's assistance to identify current manufacturing practices in the
production of brandy. Based on the information obtained in the survey,
FDA may identify good manufacturing practices used to make fruit
brandies and utilize such information in developing guidance for
industry.
Accordingly, responses to the following questions will provide TTB
with the required information to identify good manufacturing practices
in the making of fruit brandy.
Questionnaire
1. Where is your distilled spirits plant(s) located?
2. On average, how much fruit brandy, by volume, do you produce in
one year? (If you produce brandy from more than one fruit, please
provide a breakdown of production volume by each type of fruit).
3. What percentage of fruit brandy produced by you is sold in the
United States? (If you produce brandy from more than one fruit, please
provide a breakdown of production volume by each type of fruit).
4. From what geographic location do you obtain the fruit used in
the production of your fruit brandies?
5. What quality control procedures do you have in place regarding
the fruit used in your brandy production? (i.e. inspections, age of
fruit, condition requirements, washing, etc.)
6. How do you prepare the fruit to create the mash for
fermentation?
7. Do you use any additional enzymes in the mash to aid in the
fermentation? If so, please describe the specific enzymes that you are
using.
8. Please describe the type of still you use in the production of
your fruit brandies. (e.g. Pot, Alembic, Pot Rectified, Armagnac,
Continuous, Other).
9. What is the degree of proof of your fruit brandies at
distillation, before dilution and bottling?
10. In the case of brandies produced by pot still, what is the
composite proof at distillation?
11. What is the heads/tails cutoff distillation and how do you
determine the cutoff points?
12. What is your process for diluting the distillate in order to
adjust the proof for bottling?
13. What is the proof of your finished product after bottling?
14. Are your fruit brandies aged before bottling? If yes, please
describe the aging process and the aging period. Also, please indicate
the proof of the product before and after aging.
15. What quality control practices do you use, other than those
previously mentioned, to control the level of methanol in your finished
fruit brandies?
16. Do you monitor the level of methanol in your fruit brandies? If
you do monitor the level of methanol, describe your monitoring process
and provide data on methanol levels for the past 3 years.
Current Actions: New information collection.
Type of Review: Regular.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 43.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 91.75.
Request for Comments
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be included or
summarized in our request for Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval of this information collection. All comments are part of the
public record and subject to disclosure. Please do not include any
confidential or inappropriate material in your comments.
We invite comments on: (a) Whether this information collection is
necessary for the proper performance of the agency's functions,
including whether the information has practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of the agency's estimate of the information collection's
burden; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; (d) ways to minimize the information
collection's burden on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology; and (e) estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of
operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide the
requested information.
Dated: March 25, 2005.
William H. Foster,
Chief, Regulations and Procedures Division.
[FR Doc. 05-6346 Filed 3-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P