Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of Iowa, 16126-16129 [05-6291]
Download as PDF
16126
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 804
exempts from section 801 the following
types of rules: (1) Rules of particular
applicability; (2) rules relating to agency
management or personnel; and (3) rules
of agency organization, procedure, or
practice that do not substantially affect
the rights or obligations of non-agency
parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). EPA is not
required to submit a rule report
regarding today’s action under section
801 because this is a rule of particular
applicability establishing sourcespecific requirements for four named
sources.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: March 18, 2005.
James Newsom,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
I
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by May 31, 2005.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule
approving source-specific RACT
requirements for four sources in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN—Pennsylvania
2. In § 52.2020, the table in paragraph
(d)(1) is amended by adding the entries
for Pope and Talbot, Inc., Pennsylvania
Power and Light Company, Ellwood
Group Inc., and National Fuel Gas
Supply Corporation at the end of the
table to read as follows:
I
§ 52.2020
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
*
(1) EPA-APPROVED SOURCE-SPECIFIC REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (RACT) REQUIREMENTS FOR
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC) AND OXIDES OF NITROGEN (NOX)
Name of source
Permit No.
State effective
date
County
*
Pope and Talbot, Inc. ...
*
*
*
35–0004 ...................... Lackawanna ................
5/31/96 ..........
Pennsylvania Power
and Light Company.
22–2011 ......................
Dauphin ......................
6/7/95 ............
Ellwood Group Inc. .......
OP 37–313 .................
Lawrence ....................
1/31/01 ..........
National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation.
53–0009A, 53–0009 ...
Potter ..........................
8/5/96 ............
[FR Doc. 05–6289 Filed 3–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R07–OAR–2005–IA–0001; FRL–7892–1]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:21 Mar 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Direct final rule.
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
EPA approval date
Sfmt 4700
*
3/30/05 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
3/30/05 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
3/30/05 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
3/30/05 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
Additional explanation/
§ 52.2063 citation
*
52.2020 (d)(1)(d)
52.2020 (d)(1)(d)
52.2020 (d)(1)(d)
52.2020 (d)(1)(d)
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve a
revision to the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the state of
Iowa. The purpose of this revision is to
approve the 2004 update to the Polk
County Board of Health Rules and
Regulations, Chapter V, Air Pollution.
These revisions will help to ensure
consistency between the applicable
local agency rules and Federallyapproved rules, and ensure Federal
enforceability of the applicable parts of
the local agency air programs.
E:\FR\FM\30MRR1.SGM
30MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
This direct final rule will be
effective May 31, 2005, without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by April 29, 2005. If adverse
comment is received, EPA will publish
a timely withdrawal of the direct final
rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take
effect.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number R07–OAR–
2005–IA–0001, by one of the following
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:/
/www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Agency Website: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘quick search;’’ then key
in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
3. E-mail: hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
4. Mail: Heather Hamilton,
Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to Heather Hamilton,
Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101.
Copies of documents relative to this
action are available for public
inspection during normal business
hours at the EPA Region 7 location
listed in the previous paragraph. The
interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least 24
hours in advance.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
RME ID No. R07–OAR–2005–IA–0001.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through RME, regulations.gov,
or e-mail. The EPA RME website and
the Federal regulations.gov website are
‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
ADDRESSES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:21 Mar 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through RME or
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the RME
index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in RME or
in hard copy at the Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 901 North 5th
Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The
Regional Office’s official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8
to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays. The
interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least 24
hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Hamilton at (913) 551–7039, or
by e-mail at hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This section provides additional
information by addressing the following
questions:
What is a SIP?
What is the Federal approval process for a
SIP?
What does Federal approval of a state
regulation mean to me?
What is being addressed in this document?
Have the requirements for approval of a SIP
revision been met?
What action is EPA taking?
What Is a SIP?
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) requires states to develop air
pollution regulations and control
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
16127
strategies to ensure that state air quality
meets the national ambient air quality
standards established by EPA. These
ambient standards are established under
section 109 of the CAA, and they
currently address six criteria pollutants.
These pollutants are: carbon monoxide,
nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead,
particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
Each state must submit these
regulations and control strategies to us
for approval and incorporation into the
Federally-enforceable SIP.
Each Federally-approved SIP protects
air quality primarily by addressing air
pollution at its point of origin. These
SIPs can be extensive, containing state
regulations or other enforceable
documents and supporting information
such as emission inventories,
monitoring networks, and modeling
demonstrations.
What Is the Federal Approval Process
for a SIP?
In order for state regulations to be
incorporated into the Federallyenforceable SIP, states must formally
adopt the regulations and control
strategies consistent with state and
Federal requirements. This process
generally includes a public notice,
public hearing, public comment period,
and a formal adoption by a stateauthorized rulemaking body.
Once a state rule, regulation, or
control strategy is adopted, the state
submits it to us for inclusion into the
SIP. We must provide public notice and
seek additional public comment
regarding the proposed Federal action
on the state submission. If adverse
comments are received, they must be
addressed prior to any final Federal
action by us.
All state regulations and supporting
information approved by EPA under
section 110 of the CAA are incorporated
into the Federally-approved SIP.
Records of such SIP actions are
maintained in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at Title 40, part 52,
entitled ‘‘Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans.’’ The actual state
regulations which are approved are not
reproduced in their entirety in the CFR
outright but are ‘‘incorporated by
reference,’’ which means that we have
approved a given state regulation with
a specific effective date.
What Does Federal Approval of a State
Regulation Mean to Me?
Enforcement of the state regulation
before and after it is incorporated into
the Federally-approved SIP is primarily
a state responsibility. However, after the
regulation is Federally approved, we are
authorized to take enforcement action
E:\FR\FM\30MRR1.SGM
30MRR1
16128
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
against violators. Citizens are also
offered legal recourse to address
violations as described in section 304 of
the CAA.
What Is Being Addressed in This
Document?
The Iowa Department of Natural
Resources (IDNR) requested EPA
approval of the 2004 revisions to the
Polk County Board of Health Rules and
Regulations, Chapter V, Air Pollution, as
a revision to the Iowa SIP. The changes
were adopted by the Polk County Board
of Health Supervisors on January 6,
2004, and became effective the same
day.
The following is a description of the
revisions to the Polk County Board of
Health Rules and Regulations, Air
Pollution, Chapter V, which are subject
to this approval action:
1. Changes in Definitions. Changes
were made to the following definitions
found in Article I, 5–2: AQD, emission
limitation and emission standard,
Health Officer, and EPA reference
method. These changes make minor
clarifications to the definitions and
updates to the references to Federal
rules.
2. Revision to general limitation of
visible air contaminants. Article IV, 5–
9 changes the opacity of visible air
contaminants to equal to, or greater than
20 percent or a lesser level as specified
in a construction or operating permit.
The previous percentage of opacity was
40 percent. This revision will reduce
opacity and elevate the protection of air
quality.
3. Revision to emission of air
contaminants from industrial processes.
Article VI, 5–14 revises the emission of
particulate matter from any process
from 0.1 grain per dry standard cubic
foot of exhaust gas, to 0.10 grain per dry
standard cubic foot of exhaust gas.
4. Excess emissions. Article VI, 5–
17(b) and 5–17(d) is revised to remove
the language ‘‘other than incident
during startup or shutdown.’’ These
revisions make the regulations more
stringent by identifying excess
emissions during a period of startup or
shutdown as violations.
5. A typographical error is corrected
in Article VI, 5–17(e) to read as
‘‘Subsections (a) through (d)’’.
6. Performance test for stack emission
test. Article VII, 5–18 makes a reference
to ‘‘Compliance Sampling Manual’’. The
revision reflects the most current update
of the Manual through March 14, 2001.
7. Article VII, 5–18(a)(3) makes
updates to reference the most current
Federal rules.
8. Processing of application for
permits. Article X, Division 1
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:21 Mar 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
(Construction Permits), 5–30 removes
the language referring to issuance of
construction permits for new major
stationary source permits. These permits
are not issued by the Polk County Air
Quality Division office, but rather by
IDNR. The correct title of the Polk
County Air Quality Division was also
cited to be consistent with the updated
definition.
9. Exemptions from permit
requirements. Article X, Division 1
(Construction Permits), 5–33, added
references to Federal rules to make the
SIP more stringent.
10. Article X, Division 1 (Construction
Permits), 5–33(18), is a new paragraph
for internal combustion engines that
exclusively burn natural gas with a
brake horsepower rating of less than 100
measured at the shaft. For this
exemption, the manufacturer’s
nameplate rating at full load is defined
as the brake horsepower output at the
shaft.
11. Article X, Division 2 (Operating
Permits), 5–39, added references to
Federal rules to make the SIP more
stringent.
12. Article X, Division 2 (Operating
Permits), 5–39(b)(6) is a new paragraph
for internal combustion engines that
exclusively burn natural gas with a
brake horsepower rating of less than 100
measured at the shaft. For this
exemption, the manufacturer’s
nameplate rating at full load is defined
as the brake horsepower output at the
shaft.
Have the Requirements for Approval of
a SIP Revision Been Met?
The state submittal has met the public
notice requirements for SIP submissions
in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The
submittal also satisfied the
completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51,
appendix V. In addition, as explained
above and in more detail in the
technical support document which is
part of this document, the revision
meets the substantive SIP requirements
of the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
What Action Is EPA Taking?
EPA is approving a revision to the SIP
submitted by the state of Iowa, to
approve the 2004 update to the Polk
County Board of Health Rules and
Regulations, Chapter V, Air Pollution.
These revisions will ensure consistency
between the applicable local agency
rules and Federally-approved rules, and
ensure Federal enforceability of the
applicable parts of the local agency air
programs.
We are taking direct final action to
approve this revision. The revisions
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
make routine changes to the existing
rules which are noncontroversial.
Therefore, we do not anticipate any
adverse comments. Please note that if
EPA receives adverse comment on part
of this rule and if that part can be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those parts of
the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
CAA. This rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045, ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
E:\FR\FM\30MRR1.SGM
30MRR1
16129
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 30, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. In this context, in the absence
of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the CAA. Thus, the requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by May 31, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: March 21, 2005
James B. Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart Q—Iowa
2. In § 52.820 the table in paragraph (c)
is amended by revising the entry for
‘‘Chapter V’’ under the heading ‘‘Polk
County’’ to read as follows:
I
§ 52.820
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA–APPROVED IOWA REGULATIONS
Iowa citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Commission [567]
*
*
CHAPTER V. ..........
*
*
*
*
*
*
Polk County
Polk County Board of Health Rules and
Regulations Air Pollution Chapter V.
*
ACTION:
1/6/2004
*
March 30, 2005 [insert FR page
number where
the document begins].
Final rule.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[TX–162–1–7598; FRL–7892–7]
Limited Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Texas; Excess
Emissions During Startup, Shutdown
and Malfunction Activities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:21 Mar 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
*
Article I, Section 5–2, definition of
‘‘variance’’; Article VI, Sections 5–
16(n), (o) and (p); Article VIII, Article
IX, Sections 5–27(3) and (4); Article
XIII, and Article XVI, Section 5–75 (b)
are not a part of the SIP.
DATES:
This rule is effective on April 29,
2005.
[FR Doc. 05–6291 Filed 3–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
*
SUMMARY: This action finalizes limited
approval of revisions to the Texas State
Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning
excess emissions for which we proposed
approval on March 2, 2004. The
revisions address reporting,
recordkeeping, and enforcement actions
for excess emissions during startup,
shutdown, and malfunction (SSM)
activities. This limited approval action
is being taken under section 110 of the
Federal Clean Air Act (the Act) to
further air quality improvement by
strengthening the SIP. See sections 1
and 3 of this document for more
information.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Copies of the documents
relevant to this action are available for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the following
locations. Anyone wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the appropriate office
at least two working days in advance.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 6, Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–
2733.
Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality (TCEQ), Office of Air Quality,
12124 Park 35 Circle, Austin, Texas
78753.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\30MRR1.SGM
30MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 30, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16126-16129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6291]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R07-OAR-2005-IA-0001; FRL-7892-1]
Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of
Iowa
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve a revision to the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the state of Iowa. The purpose of this revision
is to approve the 2004 update to the Polk County Board of Health Rules
and Regulations, Chapter V, Air Pollution. These revisions will help to
ensure consistency between the applicable local agency rules and
Federally-approved rules, and ensure Federal enforceability of the
applicable parts of the local agency air programs.
[[Page 16127]]
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective May 31, 2005, without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by April 29, 2005.
If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID Number R07-OAR-2005-IA-0001, by one of the following
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
2. Agency Website: https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA's
electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's preferred method
for receiving comments. Once in the system, select ``quick search;''
then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification number. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
3. E-mail: hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
4. Mail: Heather Hamilton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to Heather
Hamilton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development
Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
Copies of documents relative to this action are available for
public inspection during normal business hours at the EPA Region 7
location listed in the previous paragraph. The interested persons
wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment with the
office at least 24 hours in advance.
Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R07-OAR-2005-IA-
0001. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov,
or e-mail. The EPA RME website and the Federal regulations.gov website
are ``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
RME index at https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either electronically in RME
or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning
and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays. The interested
persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment
with the office at least 24 hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Hamilton at (913) 551-7039, or
by e-mail at hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This section provides
additional information by addressing the following questions:
What is a SIP?
What is the Federal approval process for a SIP?
What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?
What is being addressed in this document?
Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
What action is EPA taking?
What Is a SIP?
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop
air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state
air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards
established by EPA. These ambient standards are established under
section 109 of the CAA, and they currently address six criteria
pollutants. These pollutants are: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide,
ozone, lead, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
Each state must submit these regulations and control strategies to
us for approval and incorporation into the Federally-enforceable SIP.
Each Federally-approved SIP protects air quality primarily by
addressing air pollution at its point of origin. These SIPs can be
extensive, containing state regulations or other enforceable documents
and supporting information such as emission inventories, monitoring
networks, and modeling demonstrations.
What Is the Federal Approval Process for a SIP?
In order for state regulations to be incorporated into the
Federally-enforceable SIP, states must formally adopt the regulations
and control strategies consistent with state and Federal requirements.
This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public
comment period, and a formal adoption by a state-authorized rulemaking
body.
Once a state rule, regulation, or control strategy is adopted, the
state submits it to us for inclusion into the SIP. We must provide
public notice and seek additional public comment regarding the proposed
Federal action on the state submission. If adverse comments are
received, they must be addressed prior to any final Federal action by
us.
All state regulations and supporting information approved by EPA
under section 110 of the CAA are incorporated into the Federally-
approved SIP. Records of such SIP actions are maintained in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) at Title 40, part 52, entitled ``Approval and
Promulgation of Implementation Plans.'' The actual state regulations
which are approved are not reproduced in their entirety in the CFR
outright but are ``incorporated by reference,'' which means that we
have approved a given state regulation with a specific effective date.
What Does Federal Approval of a State Regulation Mean to Me?
Enforcement of the state regulation before and after it is
incorporated into the Federally-approved SIP is primarily a state
responsibility. However, after the regulation is Federally approved, we
are authorized to take enforcement action
[[Page 16128]]
against violators. Citizens are also offered legal recourse to address
violations as described in section 304 of the CAA.
What Is Being Addressed in This Document?
The Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) requested EPA
approval of the 2004 revisions to the Polk County Board of Health Rules
and Regulations, Chapter V, Air Pollution, as a revision to the Iowa
SIP. The changes were adopted by the Polk County Board of Health
Supervisors on January 6, 2004, and became effective the same day.
The following is a description of the revisions to the Polk County
Board of Health Rules and Regulations, Air Pollution, Chapter V, which
are subject to this approval action:
1. Changes in Definitions. Changes were made to the following
definitions found in Article I, 5-2: AQD, emission limitation and
emission standard, Health Officer, and EPA reference method. These
changes make minor clarifications to the definitions and updates to the
references to Federal rules.
2. Revision to general limitation of visible air contaminants.
Article IV, 5-9 changes the opacity of visible air contaminants to
equal to, or greater than 20 percent or a lesser level as specified in
a construction or operating permit. The previous percentage of opacity
was 40 percent. This revision will reduce opacity and elevate the
protection of air quality.
3. Revision to emission of air contaminants from industrial
processes. Article VI, 5-14 revises the emission of particulate matter
from any process from 0.1 grain per dry standard cubic foot of exhaust
gas, to 0.10 grain per dry standard cubic foot of exhaust gas.
4. Excess emissions. Article VI, 5-17(b) and 5-17(d) is revised to
remove the language ``other than incident during startup or shutdown.''
These revisions make the regulations more stringent by identifying
excess emissions during a period of startup or shutdown as violations.
5. A typographical error is corrected in Article VI, 5-17(e) to
read as ``Subsections (a) through (d)''.
6. Performance test for stack emission test. Article VII, 5-18
makes a reference to ``Compliance Sampling Manual''. The revision
reflects the most current update of the Manual through March 14, 2001.
7. Article VII, 5-18(a)(3) makes updates to reference the most
current Federal rules.
8. Processing of application for permits. Article X, Division 1
(Construction Permits), 5-30 removes the language referring to issuance
of construction permits for new major stationary source permits. These
permits are not issued by the Polk County Air Quality Division office,
but rather by IDNR. The correct title of the Polk County Air Quality
Division was also cited to be consistent with the updated definition.
9. Exemptions from permit requirements. Article X, Division 1
(Construction Permits), 5-33, added references to Federal rules to make
the SIP more stringent.
10. Article X, Division 1 (Construction Permits), 5-33(18), is a
new paragraph for internal combustion engines that exclusively burn
natural gas with a brake horsepower rating of less than 100 measured at
the shaft. For this exemption, the manufacturer's nameplate rating at
full load is defined as the brake horsepower output at the shaft.
11. Article X, Division 2 (Operating Permits), 5-39, added
references to Federal rules to make the SIP more stringent.
12. Article X, Division 2 (Operating Permits), 5-39(b)(6) is a new
paragraph for internal combustion engines that exclusively burn natural
gas with a brake horsepower rating of less than 100 measured at the
shaft. For this exemption, the manufacturer's nameplate rating at full
load is defined as the brake horsepower output at the shaft.
Have the Requirements for Approval of a SIP Revision Been Met?
The state submittal has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submittal also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In
addition, as explained above and in more detail in the technical
support document which is part of this document, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
What Action Is EPA Taking?
EPA is approving a revision to the SIP submitted by the state of
Iowa, to approve the 2004 update to the Polk County Board of Health
Rules and Regulations, Chapter V, Air Pollution. These revisions will
ensure consistency between the applicable local agency rules and
Federally-approved rules, and ensure Federal enforceability of the
applicable parts of the local agency air programs.
We are taking direct final action to approve this revision. The
revisions make routine changes to the existing rules which are
noncontroversial. Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule
and if that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may
adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885,
[[Page 16129]]
April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 31, 2005. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 21, 2005
James B. Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
0
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart Q--Iowa
0
2. In Sec. 52.820 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for ``Chapter V'' under the heading ``Polk County'' to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.820 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Iowa Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Iowa citation Title effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Commission [567]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Polk County
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTER V..................... Polk County Board of 1/6/2004 March 30, 2005 Article I, Section 5-
Health Rules and [insert FR page 2, definition of
Regulations Air number where the ``variance'';
Pollution Chapter V. document begins]. Article VI, Sections
5-16(n), (o) and
(p); Article VIII,
Article IX, Sections
5-27(3) and (4);
Article XIII, and
Article XVI, Section
5-75 (b) are not a
part of the SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-6291 Filed 3-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P