Special Local Regulations; National Maritime Week Tugboat Races, Seattle, WA, 15786-15788 [05-6145]
Download as PDF
15786
§ 39.13
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Comments Due Date
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
Rolls-Royce Corporation (formerly Allison
Engine Company): Docket No. FAA–
2005–20742; Directorate Identifier 2005–
NE–03–AD.
Applicability
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by May
31, 2005.
(c) This AD applies to Rolls-Royce
Corporation (RRC) (formerly Allison Engine
Company) 501–D22A, 501–D22C, and 501–
D22G turboprop engines with the turbine
wheels listed in the following Table 1,
installed.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
TABLE 1.—AFFECTED TURBINE WHEELS
Turbine wheel part No.
6875431
6845592
6845593
6870434
Turbine wheel
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
Serial Nos.
1st Stage .......................................
2nd Stage ......................................
3rd Stage .......................................
4th Stage .......................................
KK50152
KK40998
KK36452
KK40320
through
through
through
through
KK50199.
KK41057.
KK36461, and KK36492 through KK36532.
KK40393, and KK40485 through KK40535.
These engines are installed on, but not
limited to, Commercial Hercules L–100–20,
L–100–30, L–382B, L–382E, and L–382G,
Airbus Super Guppy-201, and Super Convair
CV–580A, and CV5800 airplanes.
specified in paragraph 2.E. of RRC CEBs No.
CEB–72–1138, No. CEB–72–4051, and No.
CEB–72–1584, (combined in one document)
dated January 23, 2004, and assigned OMB
control number 2120–0056.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of a
turbine wheel found to be over dimensional
limits, caused by improper metal hardness.
We are issuing this AD to prevent
uncontained turbine wheel failure, leading to
damage of the airplane and total loss of
engine power.
Definition
(j) For the purpose of this AD, a serviceable
turbine wheel is:
(1) A turbine wheel that has a serial
number not listed in this AD; and
(2) A turbine wheel that has a serial
number listed in this AD that passed the
inspection specified in paragraph (f) of this
AD.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed at the
next shop visit of the engine or turbine
module, but not to exceed 7,400 cycles-sincenew of any 1st stage, 2nd stage, 3rd stage, or
4th stage turbine wheel, unless the actions
have already been done.
Onetime Inspection for Proper Metal
Hardness
(f) Perform a onetime inspection for proper
metal hardness of 1st stage, 2nd stage, 3rd
stage, and 4th stage turbine wheels. Use
paragraphs 2.B. and 2.F. of RRC Commercial
Engine Bulletins (CEBs) No. CEB–72–1138,
No. CEB–72–4051, and No. CEB–72–1584,
(combined in one document) dated January
23, 2004.
(g) Remove from service any turbine wheel
that does not pass inspection, using
paragraph 2.C. of RRC CEBs No. CEB–72–
1138, No. CEB–72–4051, and No. CEB–72–
1584, (combined in one document) dated
January 23, 2004.
(h) Mark the letters, HC, after the serial
number on any turbine wheel that passes
inspection, using the method described in
paragraph 2.D. of RRC CEBs No. CEB–72–
1138, No. CEB–72–4051, and No. CEB–72–
1584, (combined in one document) dated
January 23, 2004.
Reporting Requirements
(i) Report findings of inspections using the
procedures specified in paragraph 2.E. of
RRC CEBs No. CEB–72–1138, No. CEB–72–
4051, and No. CEB–72–1584, (combined in
one document) dated January 23, 2004. The
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the reporting requirements
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:56 Mar 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(k) The Manager, Chicago Aircraft
Certification Office, has the authority to
approve alternative methods of compliance
for this AD if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(1) None.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
March 22, 2005.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–6108 Filed 3–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
Request for Comments
[CGD13–05–004]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations; National
Maritime Week Tugboat Races, Seattle,
WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
permanently amend the special local
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
regulation governing general navigation
and anchorage in the vicinity of the
Annual National Maritime Week
Tugboat Races, Seattle, Washington.
Changes made to this regulation will
clarify its annual enforcement date. This
change is intended to better inform the
boating public and to improve the level
of safety at this event. Entry into the
area established is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
April 19, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commanding
Officer(wwm), Marine Safety Office
Puget Sound, 1519 Alaskan Way South,
Seattle, Washington 98134. Marine
Safety Office Puget Sound maintains the
public docket [CGD13–05–004] for this
rulemaking. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, will
become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at
Marine Safety Office Puget Sound
between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LTJG J. L. Hagen, c/o Captain of the Port
Puget Sound, 1519 Alaskan Way South,
Seattle, WA 98134, (206) 217–6002 or
(800) 688–6664.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Sfmt 4702
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD13–05–004),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Marine
Safety Office Puget Sound at the address
under ADDRESSES explaining why one
would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
Each year in May, the Annual
National Maritime Week Tugboat Races,
are held on the waters of Puget Sound
in Elliott Bay near Seattle, Washington.
Special local regulations in 33 CFR
100.1306 are enforced each year during
the event to provide for public safety by
controlling the movement of spectators
and participants in the area of the race
course.
This proposed rule would
permanently amend 33 CFR 100.1306
requiring compliance with the
regulation each year on either the
second or third Saturday in May.
Specific times of compliance will be
published in the Federal Register each
year as a notice of enforcement.
The regulated area and the special
local regulations remain unchanged.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to
permanently amend 33 CFR 100.1306—
Annual National Maritime Week
Tugboat Races, Seattle, Washington, to
require compliance with the regulation
each year in May on the second or third
Saturday.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. This expectation is
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:56 Mar 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
based on the fact that the regulated area
of Elliott Bay is a small area, enforced
for a short period of time, and it is
established for the benefit and safety of
the recreational boating public.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ cmprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
Vessels desiring to transit this area of
Elliott Bay may do so by scheduling
their trips in the early morning or
evening when the restrictions on general
navigation imposed by this section will
not be in effect. For these reasons, the
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this change will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Comments submitted in
response to this finding will be
evaluated under the criteria in the
‘‘Regulatory Information’’ section of this
preamble.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
will affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15787
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if the rule has a substantial
direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt
State law or impose a substantial direct
cost of compliance on them. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
15788
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 59 / Tuesday, March 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. In § 100.1306 revise paragraph (c)
to read as follows:
§ 100.1306 National Maritime Week
Tugboat Races, Seattle, WA.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Enforcement dates. This section is
enforced annually on the second or
third Saturday in May from 12 p.m. to
4:30 p.m. The event will be one day
only and the specific date will be
published each year in the Federal
Register. In 2005, this section will be
enforced from 12 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on
Saturday May 14.
Dated: March 21, 2005.
J.M. Garrett,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–6145 Filed 3–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–05–020]
Environment
RIN 1625–AA08
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h) of the
Instruction from further environmental
documentation. Under figure 2–1,
paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are not required for this
rule.
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Piankatank River, Gloucester
County, VA
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:56 Mar 28, 2005
Jkt 205001
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish special local regulations
during the ‘‘2005 Piankatank River
Race’’, a marine event to be held over
the waters of the Piankatank River in
Gloucester County, Virginia. These
special local regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event. This
action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in the Piankatank River during
the event.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
April 28, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(oax), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia
23704–5004, hand-deliver them to
Room 119 at the same address between
9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays, or fax
them to (757) 398–6203. The Auxiliary
and Recreational Boating Safety Branch,
Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the above
address between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Sens, Project Manager, Auxiliary
and Recreational Boating Safety Branch,
at (757) 398–6204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD05–05–020),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know how they reached us, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period. We may
change this proposed rule in view of
them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to the address
listed under ADDRESSES explaining why
one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On July 23, 2005, the East Coast Boat
Racing Club of New Jersey will sponsor
the ‘‘2005 Piankatank River Race’’, on
the waters of the Piankatank River in
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 29, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15786-15788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6145]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD13-05-004]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations; National Maritime Week Tugboat Races,
Seattle, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to permanently amend the special
local regulation governing general navigation and anchorage in the
vicinity of the Annual National Maritime Week Tugboat Races, Seattle,
Washington. Changes made to this regulation will clarify its annual
enforcement date. This change is intended to better inform the boating
public and to improve the level of safety at this event. Entry into the
area established is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before April 19, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commanding
Officer(wwm), Marine Safety Office Puget Sound, 1519 Alaskan Way South,
Seattle, Washington 98134. Marine Safety Office Puget Sound maintains
the public docket [CGD13-05-004] for this rulemaking. Comments and
material received from the public, as well as documents indicated in
this preamble as being available in the docket, will become part of
this docket and will be available for inspection or copying at Marine
Safety Office Puget Sound between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTJG J. L. Hagen, c/o Captain of the
Port Puget Sound, 1519 Alaskan Way South, Seattle, WA 98134, (206) 217-
6002 or (800) 688-6664.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD13-05-
004), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound
[[Page 15787]]
format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If
you would like to know they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-
addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period. We may change this
proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Marine Safety Office Puget Sound at
the address under ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
Each year in May, the Annual National Maritime Week Tugboat Races,
are held on the waters of Puget Sound in Elliott Bay near Seattle,
Washington. Special local regulations in 33 CFR 100.1306 are enforced
each year during the event to provide for public safety by controlling
the movement of spectators and participants in the area of the race
course.
This proposed rule would permanently amend 33 CFR 100.1306
requiring compliance with the regulation each year on either the second
or third Saturday in May. Specific times of compliance will be
published in the Federal Register each year as a notice of enforcement.
The regulated area and the special local regulations remain
unchanged.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to permanently amend 33 CFR 100.1306--
Annual National Maritime Week Tugboat Races, Seattle, Washington, to
require compliance with the regulation each year in May on the second
or third Saturday.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
It is not ``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures
of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary. This expectation is based on the fact that the
regulated area of Elliott Bay is a small area, enforced for a short
period of time, and it is established for the benefit and safety of the
recreational boating public.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
cmprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
Vessels desiring to transit this area of Elliott Bay may do so by
scheduling their trips in the early morning or evening when the
restrictions on general navigation imposed by this section will not be
in effect. For these reasons, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this change will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Comments submitted in response to this
finding will be evaluated under the criteria in the ``Regulatory
Information'' section of this preamble.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule will
affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction
and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if the rule has a substantial direct effect on State or
local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a
substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this
rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
[[Page 15788]]
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h) of the Instruction from further
environmental documentation. Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of
the Instruction, an ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. In Sec. 100.1306 revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 100.1306 National Maritime Week Tugboat Races, Seattle, WA.
* * * * *
(c) Enforcement dates. This section is enforced annually on the
second or third Saturday in May from 12 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. The event
will be one day only and the specific date will be published each year
in the Federal Register. In 2005, this section will be enforced from 12
p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Saturday May 14.
Dated: March 21, 2005.
J.M. Garrett,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 05-6145 Filed 3-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P