Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model C4 605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600), 15577-15580 [05-6106]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
of this material at the NARA, call (202) 741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
14, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–5575 Filed 3–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20748; Directorate
Identifier 2005–NM–063–AD; Amendment
39–14031; AD 2005–07–07]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A310 Series Airplanes; and Model
A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–600R
Series Airplanes, and Model C4 605R
Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called
A300–600)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A310 series airplanes;
and Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and
F4–600R series airplanes, and Model C4
605R Variant F airplanes (collectively
called A300–600). This AD requires
one-time general visual, detailed, and
tap test inspections for discrepancies in
the structural integrity of the rudder and
its attachments, and corrective actions if
necessary. This AD is prompted by a
report that, during cruise, a Model A310
series airplane lost most of its rudder,
which was made from composite-fiberreinforced plastic. Investigation
revealed that most of the rudder,
including the front spar portion above
the three servo control actuators was
missing. We are issuing this AD to
prevent detachment of the rudder from
the airplane, which could degrade
airplane handling qualities and result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
DATES: Effective March 28, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the AD is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of March 28, 2005.
We must receive comments on this
AD by May 27, 2005.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
15577
Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France.
You can examine the contents of this
AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of
the Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
This docket number is FAA–2005–
20748; the directorate identifier for this
docket is 2005–NM–063–AD.
airplane lost most of its rudder, which
was made from composite-fiberreinforced plastic (CFRP). Investigation
revealed that most of the rudder,
including the front spar portion above
the three servo control actuators was
missing. The cause of this rudder loss is
under investigation. This condition, if
not corrected, could result in
detachment of the rudder from the
airplane, which could degrade airplane
handling qualities and result in reduced
controllability of the airplane.
Examining the Docket
Airbus has issued All Operators Telex
(AOT) A310A55–2035 (for A310 series
airplanes) and AOT A300–600 55A6035
(for A300–600 series airplanes), both
dated March 16, 2005. The AOTs
describe procedures for one-time
general visual, detailed visual, and tap
test inspections for damage in the
structural integrity of the rudder and its
attachments. The inspection procedures
include a general visual inspection for
damage of the rear spar aft face of the
vertical stabilizer, including the trailing
edge structure; a detailed visual
inspection of the rudder hinge arms and
support fittings, the actuator support
fittings and the rudder hinge fittings;
and a tap test inspection for damage of
the rudder side panels of the leading
edge from the bottom to top and the
forward trailing edge connection from
the bottom up to hinge No. 5 around the
hoisting points and certain additional
areas. The AOTs also specify contacting
the manufacturer for certain repair
conditions and reporting of inspection
results. The DGAC mandated the service
information and issued French
airworthiness directive UF–2005–048,
dated March 18, 2005, to ensure the
continued airworthiness of these
airplanes in France.
ADDRESSES:
You can examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the DMS
receives them.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Backman, Aerospace Engineer, ANM–
116, International Branch, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2797;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
´ ´
Direction Generale de l’Aviation Civile
(DGAC), which is the airworthiness
authority for France, notified us that an
unsafe condition may exist on certain
Airbus Model A310 series airplanes;
and Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and
F4–600R series airplanes, and Model C4
605R Variant F airplanes (collectively
called A300–600). The DGAC advises
that, during cruise, a Model A310 series
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Similar Airplane Models
A rudder having the same part
number as that installed on Model A310
series airplanes also is installed on
Model A300–600 series airplanes.
Therefore, the latter airplanes are also
subject to the identified unsafe
condition and are included in the
applicability of the U.S. AD.
Further, a rudder having the same
part number is installed on early
versions of Model A330 and A340 series
airplanes. However, we have confirmed
that the affected rudder is not installed
on any Model A330 series airplanes of
U.S. registry. Additionally, there are no
Model A340 series airplanes on the U.S.
Register.
Relevant Service Information
E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM
28MRR1
15578
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This AD
layers and debonding between the outer
CFRP layers and the honeycomb core.
These airplane models are
manufactured in France and are type
certificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of section
21.29 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the
applicable bilateral airworthiness
agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral
airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has
kept the FAA informed of the situation
described above. We have examined the
DGAC’s findings, evaluated all pertinent
information, and determined that we
need to issue an AD for products of this
type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are issuing this AD to
prevent detachment of the rudder from
the airplane, which could degrade
airplane handling qualities and result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
This AD requires accomplishing the
actions specified in the service
information described previously,
except as discussed under ‘‘Differences
Between the AD and the Service
Information.’’ The AD also requires
sending the inspection results to Airbus,
regardless of the findings.
Clarification of Certain Sections in
Airbus A310 and A300–600 Structural
Repair Manuals
Although the French airworthiness
directive and AOTs do not identify the
sections in the SRMs that specify
damage limits for the rudder
attachments and the rudder side panels,
those sections are specified in Note 3 of
this AD.
Differences Among the AD, French
Airworthiness Directive and Service
Information
Although the French airworthiness
directive and the AOTs specify that
operators may contact the manufacturer
for certain repair conditions, this AD
requires operators to repair those
conditions per a method approved by
either the FAA or the DGAC (or its
delegated agent). In light of the type of
repair that would be required to address
the unsafe condition, and consistent
with existing bilateral airworthiness
agreements, we have determined that,
for this AD, a repair approved by either
the FAA or the DGAC (or its delegated
agent) would be acceptable for
compliance with this AD.
The French airworthiness directive
and AOTs specify inspecting the rudder
attachments and the rudder side panels
for damage and reporting findings to the
manufacturer, but there is no definition
of the type of damage to inspect for or
findings to report. This AD requires
inspecting for discrepancies in the
structural integrity of the rudder and its
attachments. For the general visual and
detailed inspections, the discrepancies
to inspect for and report include
corrosion, cracks, abrasion, scratches,
and dents. For the tap test, the
discrepancies to inspect for and report
include delamination in the outer CFRP
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Clarification of Inspection
Terminology/AOT Number
In this AD, the ‘‘detailed visual
inspection’’ specified in the AOTs is
referred to as a ‘‘detailed inspection.’’
We have included the definition for a
detailed inspection in a note in the AD.
The French airworthiness directive
identifies the AOT number for A310
series airplanes as A310 55A2035;
however, the number is transposed in
the AOT and identified as A310A55–
2035. This AD will identify the AOT
number as A310A55–2035 to adhere to
the Office of the Federal Register
guidelines for materials incorporated by
reference.
Interim Action
This is considered to be interim
action. The inspection report that is
required by this AD will enable the
FAA, DGAC, and the manufacturer to
obtain better insight into the potential
unsafe condition, and eventually to
develop final action to address it, if
necessary. If final action is identified,
the FAA may consider further
rulemaking.
FAA’s Determination of the Effective
Date
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD; therefore, providing notice and
opportunity for public comment before
the AD is issued is impracticable, and
good cause exists to make this AD
effective upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements that affect flight safety and
was not preceded by notice and an
opportunity for public comment;
however, we invite you to submit any
relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this AD. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2005–20748; Directorate Identifier
2005–NM–063–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this AD. Using the
search function of our docket Web site,
anyone can find and read the comments
in any of our dockets, including the
name of the individual who sent the
comment (or signed the comment on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You can review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78), or you can visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM
28MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for
a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
I
2005–07–07 Airbus: Amendment 39–14031.
Docket No. FAA–2005–20748;
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–063–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective March 28,
2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A310
Series Airplanes; and Model A300 B4–600,
B4–600R, and F4–600R series airplanes, and
Model C4 605R Variant F airplanes
(collectively called A300–600); certificated in
any category; equipped with any compositefiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) rudder with
part number (P/N) A55471500 series
installed.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by a report that,
during cruise, a Model A310 series airplane
lost most of its rudder, which was made from
CFRP. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent
detachment of the rudder from the airplane,
which could degrade airplane handling
qualities and result in reduced controllability
of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
One-Time Inspections
(f) Within 550 flight hours or 3 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
is first: Perform one-time general visual,
detailed, and tap test inspections for
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
discrepancies in the structural integrity of the
rudder and its attachments, in accordance
with Airbus All Operators Telex (AOT)
A310A55–2035 (for A310 series airplanes)
and Airbus AOT A300–600 55A6035 (for
A300–600 series airplanes), both dated
March 16, 2005. For the one-time general
visual and detailed inspections,
discrepancies include corrosion, cracks,
abrasion, scratches, and dents. For the tap
test, discrepancies include delamination in
the outer CFRP layers and debonding
between the outer CFRP layers and the
honeycomb core.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
general visual inspection is: ‘‘A visual
examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious
damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of
inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror
may be necessary to enhance visual access to
all exposed surfaces in the inspection area.
This level of inspection is made under
normally available lighting conditions such
as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or
opening of access panels or doors. Stands,
ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.’’
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive
examination of a specific item, installation,
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface
cleaning and elaborate procedures may be
required.’’
Actions Accomplished Previously
(g) Inspections accomplished within the
last 18 months before the effective date of
this AD in accordance with section 4.2.2 of
Airbus AOTs A310A55–2035 and A300–600
55A6035, both dated March 16, 2005; are
considered acceptable for compliance with
the corresponding actions specified in
paragraph (f) of this AD, after the inspection
results are reported to Airbus as required in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
Corrective Actions
(h) If any discrepancy of the rudder
attachments that exceeds the limits specified
in the Airbus A310 or A300–600 Structural
Repair Manual (SRM), or any discrepancy of
the rudder side panels is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (f) of this
AD: Before further flight, repair or otherwise
disposition, in accordance with a method
approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, Transport Airplane
´ ´
Directorate; or the Direction Generale de
l’Aviation Civile (DGAC) (or its delegated
agent).
Note 3: Limits for allowable damage and
rework for the rudder attachment fittings are
specified in Sections 55–40–00, 55–36–42,
55–30–00, and 55–46–11 of the Airbus A310
and A300–600 SRM.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15579
Reporting Requirement
(i) Within 10 days after accomplishing all
the inspections required by paragraph (f) of
this AD: Submit Airbus Technical
Disposition 943.0267/05, Issue A, ‘‘CFRP
Rudder—Inspection Reporting Sheets’’ with
the inspection results (both positive and
negative findings) to Airbus Customer
Service Engineering, Mr. X. Jolivet, SEE83, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex France; fax (+33) 5 61 93 36 14. Under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements contained in this AD and has
assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056.
Note 4: The reporting sheets referenced in
paragraph (j) of this AD will be provided by
Airbus, as specified in Section 2., of Airbus
AOTs A310A55–2035 and A300–600
55A6035, both dated March 16, 2005.
Parts Installation
(j) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install on any airplane a CFRP
rudder, P/N A55471500 series, unless the
requirements specified in paragraphs (f), (h)
and (i) of this AD have been accomplished.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(k) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(l) French airworthiness directive UF–
2005–048, dated March 18, 2005, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use Airbus All Operators
Telex A310A55–2035, dated March 16, 2005;
and Airbus All Operators Telex A300–600
55A6035, dated March 16, 2005; as
applicable; to perform the actions that are
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise. The Director of the Federal
Register approves the incorporation by
reference of these documents in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. For
copies of the service information, contact
Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. To view the
AD docket go to the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401,
Nassif Building, Washington, DC. To review
copies of the service information, go to the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM
28MRR1
15580
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
23, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–6106 Filed 3–25–05; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
14 CFR Part 145
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20062; Airspace
Docket No. 05–ACE–4]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–1999–5836]
Modification of Class E Airspace;
Nevada, MO
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20061; Airspace
Docket No. 05–ACE–3]
Direct final rule; confirmation of
effective date.
ACTION:
Modification of Class E Airspace;
Ozark, MO
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of
effective date.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document confirms the
effective date of the direct final rule
which revises Class E airspace at Ozark,
MO.
EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, May 12,
2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division,
Airspace Branch, ACE–520A, DOT
Regional Headquarters Building, Federal
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone:
(816) 329–2524.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
published this direct final rule with a
request for comments in the Federal
Register on February 10, 2005 (70 FR
7021) and the Federal Register
subsequently published a correction to
the rule on Friday, February 18, 2005
(70 FR 8432). The FAA uses the direct
final rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA
believes that there will be no adverse
public comment. This direct final rule
advised the public that no adverse
comments were anticipated, and that
unless a written adverse comment, or a
written notice of intent to submit such
an adverse comment, were received
within the comment period, the
regulation would become effective on
May 12, 2005. No adverse comments
were received, and thus this notice
confirms that this direct final rule will
become effective on that date.
Issued in Kansas City, MO, on March 15,
2005.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services
Operations.
[FR Doc. 05–5966 Filed 3–25–05; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY: This document confirms the
effective date of the direct final rule
which revises Class E airspace at
Nevada, MO.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
0901 UTC, May 12,
2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division,
Airspace Branch, ACE–520A, DOT
Regional Headquarters Building, Federal
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone:
(816) 329–2524.
The FAA
published this direct final rule with a
request for comments in the Federal
Register on February 10, 2005 (70 FR
7020). The FAA uses the direct final
rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA
believes that there will be no adverse
public comment. This direct final rule
advised the public that no adverse
comments were anticipated, and that
unless a written adverse comment, or a
written notice of intent to submit such
an adverse comment, were received
within the comment period, the
regulation would become effective on
May 12, 2005. No adverse comments
were received, and thus this notice
confirms that this direct final rule will
become effective on that date.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Kansas City, MO, on March 15,
2005.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services
Operations.
[FR Doc. 05–5967 Filed 3–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 2120–AI60
Repair Stations
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective
date.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is delaying the
effective date of the final rule requiring
each repair station to have an approved
training program. This action is
necessary because applicable guidance
material is not yet available to assist
repair stations in developing their
programs. The delayed date will give
repair stations sufficient time to develop
their programs and will give the FAA
time to evaluate and approve them.
DATES: The effective date of § 145.163
published at 66 FR 41117 (August 6,
2001) is delayed until April 6, 2006. The
amendments in this final rule become
effective April 6, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Herbert E. Daniel, Aircraft Maintenance
Division, General Aviation and Repair
Station Branch (AFS–340), Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20591; facsimile (202) 267–5115; email Herbert.E.Daniel@faa.gov or by
telephone at (202) 267–3109; or Mr. Dan
Bachelder, AFS–340, at the address or
facsimile listed above or e-mail
Dan.Bachelder@faa.gov or by telephone
at (202) 267–7027.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in title 49,
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section
44701, General requirements, and
section 44707, Examining and rating air
agencies. Under section 44701, the FAA
may prescribe regulations and standards
in the interest of safety for inspecting,
servicing, and overhauling aircraft,
aircraft engines, propellers, and
appliances. It may also prescribe
equipment and facilities for, and the
timing and manner of, inspecting,
E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM
28MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 58 (Monday, March 28, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15577-15580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6106]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-20748; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-063-AD;
Amendment 39-14031; AD 2005-07-07]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and
Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model C4
605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A310 series airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, B4-
600R, and F4-600R series airplanes, and Model C4 605R Variant F
airplanes (collectively called A300-600). This AD requires one-time
general visual, detailed, and tap test inspections for discrepancies in
the structural integrity of the rudder and its attachments, and
corrective actions if necessary. This AD is prompted by a report that,
during cruise, a Model A310 series airplane lost most of its rudder,
which was made from composite-fiber-reinforced plastic. Investigation
revealed that most of the rudder, including the front spar portion
above the three servo control actuators was missing. We are issuing
this AD to prevent detachment of the rudder from the airplane, which
could degrade airplane handling qualities and result in reduced
controllability of the airplane.
DATES: Effective March 28, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the AD is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of March
28, 2005.
We must receive comments on this AD by May 27, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France.
You can examine the contents of this AD docket on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-
401, on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Washington, DC. This
docket number is FAA-2005-20748; the directorate identifier for this
docket is 2005-NM-063-AD.
Examining the Docket
You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the DMS receives them.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Backman, Aerospace Engineer, ANM-
116, International Branch, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-
2797; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de
l'Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the airworthiness authority for
France, notified us that an unsafe condition may exist on certain
Airbus Model A310 series airplanes; and Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and
F4-600R series airplanes, and Model C4 605R Variant F airplanes
(collectively called A300-600). The DGAC advises that, during cruise, a
Model A310 series airplane lost most of its rudder, which was made from
composite-fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP). Investigation revealed that
most of the rudder, including the front spar portion above the three
servo control actuators was missing. The cause of this rudder loss is
under investigation. This condition, if not corrected, could result in
detachment of the rudder from the airplane, which could degrade
airplane handling qualities and result in reduced controllability of
the airplane.
Similar Airplane Models
A rudder having the same part number as that installed on Model
A310 series airplanes also is installed on Model A300-600 series
airplanes. Therefore, the latter airplanes are also subject to the
identified unsafe condition and are included in the applicability of
the U.S. AD.
Further, a rudder having the same part number is installed on early
versions of Model A330 and A340 series airplanes. However, we have
confirmed that the affected rudder is not installed on any Model A330
series airplanes of U.S. registry. Additionally, there are no Model
A340 series airplanes on the U.S. Register.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued All Operators Telex (AOT) A310A55-2035 (for A310
series airplanes) and AOT A300-600 55A6035 (for A300-600 series
airplanes), both dated March 16, 2005. The AOTs describe procedures for
one-time general visual, detailed visual, and tap test inspections for
damage in the structural integrity of the rudder and its attachments.
The inspection procedures include a general visual inspection for
damage of the rear spar aft face of the vertical stabilizer, including
the trailing edge structure; a detailed visual inspection of the rudder
hinge arms and support fittings, the actuator support fittings and the
rudder hinge fittings; and a tap test inspection for damage of the
rudder side panels of the leading edge from the bottom to top and the
forward trailing edge connection from the bottom up to hinge No. 5
around the hoisting points and certain additional areas. The AOTs also
specify contacting the manufacturer for certain repair conditions and
reporting of inspection results. The DGAC mandated the service
information and issued French airworthiness directive UF-2005-048,
dated March 18, 2005, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these
airplanes in France.
[[Page 15578]]
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD
These airplane models are manufactured in France and are type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. We have examined the DGAC's findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and determined that we need to
issue an AD for products of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are issuing this AD to prevent detachment of the
rudder from the airplane, which could degrade airplane handling
qualities and result in reduced controllability of the airplane. This
AD requires accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously, except as discussed under
``Differences Between the AD and the Service Information.'' The AD also
requires sending the inspection results to Airbus, regardless of the
findings.
Differences Among the AD, French Airworthiness Directive and Service
Information
Although the French airworthiness directive and the AOTs specify
that operators may contact the manufacturer for certain repair
conditions, this AD requires operators to repair those conditions per a
method approved by either the FAA or the DGAC (or its delegated agent).
In light of the type of repair that would be required to address the
unsafe condition, and consistent with existing bilateral airworthiness
agreements, we have determined that, for this AD, a repair approved by
either the FAA or the DGAC (or its delegated agent) would be acceptable
for compliance with this AD.
The French airworthiness directive and AOTs specify inspecting the
rudder attachments and the rudder side panels for damage and reporting
findings to the manufacturer, but there is no definition of the type of
damage to inspect for or findings to report. This AD requires
inspecting for discrepancies in the structural integrity of the rudder
and its attachments. For the general visual and detailed inspections,
the discrepancies to inspect for and report include corrosion, cracks,
abrasion, scratches, and dents. For the tap test, the discrepancies to
inspect for and report include delamination in the outer CFRP layers
and debonding between the outer CFRP layers and the honeycomb core.
Clarification of Certain Sections in Airbus A310 and A300-600
Structural Repair Manuals
Although the French airworthiness directive and AOTs do not
identify the sections in the SRMs that specify damage limits for the
rudder attachments and the rudder side panels, those sections are
specified in Note 3 of this AD.
Clarification of Inspection Terminology/AOT Number
In this AD, the ``detailed visual inspection'' specified in the
AOTs is referred to as a ``detailed inspection.'' We have included the
definition for a detailed inspection in a note in the AD.
The French airworthiness directive identifies the AOT number for
A310 series airplanes as A310 55A2035; however, the number is
transposed in the AOT and identified as A310A55-2035. This AD will
identify the AOT number as A310A55-2035 to adhere to the Office of the
Federal Register guidelines for materials incorporated by reference.
Interim Action
This is considered to be interim action. The inspection report that
is required by this AD will enable the FAA, DGAC, and the manufacturer
to obtain better insight into the potential unsafe condition, and
eventually to develop final action to address it, if necessary. If
final action is identified, the FAA may consider further rulemaking.
FAA's Determination of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD; therefore, providing notice and opportunity for public comment
before the AD is issued is impracticable, and good cause exists to make
this AD effective upon publication in the Federal Register.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements that affect
flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for
public comment; however, we invite you to submit any relevant written
data, views, or arguments regarding this AD. Send your comments to an
address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2005-20748;
Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-063-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend the AD in light
of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this AD. Using the search function of our docket
Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or signed
the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You can review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you can visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities
[[Page 15579]]
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to
examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2005-07-07 Airbus: Amendment 39-14031. Docket No. FAA-2005-20748;
Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-063-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective March 28, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes; and
Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series airplanes, and Model
C4 605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called A300-600);
certificated in any category; equipped with any composite-fiber-
reinforced plastic (CFRP) rudder with part number (P/N) A55471500
series installed.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by a report that, during cruise, a
Model A310 series airplane lost most of its rudder, which was made
from CFRP. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent detachment of the
rudder from the airplane, which could degrade airplane handling
qualities and result in reduced controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
One-Time Inspections
(f) Within 550 flight hours or 3 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever is first: Perform one-time general visual,
detailed, and tap test inspections for discrepancies in the
structural integrity of the rudder and its attachments, in
accordance with Airbus All Operators Telex (AOT) A310A55-2035 (for
A310 series airplanes) and Airbus AOT A300-600 55A6035 (for A300-600
series airplanes), both dated March 16, 2005. For the one-time
general visual and detailed inspections, discrepancies include
corrosion, cracks, abrasion, scratches, and dents. For the tap test,
discrepancies include delamination in the outer CFRP layers and
debonding between the outer CFRP layers and the honeycomb core.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
is: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or
irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to
enhance visual access to all exposed surfaces in the inspection
area. This level of inspection is made under normally available
lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight,
or droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or
doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.''
Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''
Actions Accomplished Previously
(g) Inspections accomplished within the last 18 months before
the effective date of this AD in accordance with section 4.2.2 of
Airbus AOTs A310A55-2035 and A300-600 55A6035, both dated March 16,
2005; are considered acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding actions specified in paragraph (f) of this AD, after
the inspection results are reported to Airbus as required in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
Corrective Actions
(h) If any discrepancy of the rudder attachments that exceeds
the limits specified in the Airbus A310 or A300-600 Structural
Repair Manual (SRM), or any discrepancy of the rudder side panels is
found during any inspection required by paragraph (f) of this AD:
Before further flight, repair or otherwise disposition, in
accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate; or the
Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC) (or its
delegated agent).
Note 3: Limits for allowable damage and rework for the rudder
attachment fittings are specified in Sections 55-40-00, 55-36-42,
55-30-00, and 55-46-11 of the Airbus A310 and A300-600 SRM.
Reporting Requirement
(i) Within 10 days after accomplishing all the inspections
required by paragraph (f) of this AD: Submit Airbus Technical
Disposition 943.0267/05, Issue A, ``CFRP Rudder--Inspection
Reporting Sheets'' with the inspection results (both positive and
negative findings) to Airbus Customer Service Engineering, Mr. X.
Jolivet, SEE83, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex
France; fax (+33) 5 61 93 36 14. Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements contained in this AD and has assigned OMB
Control Number 2120-0056.
Note 4: The reporting sheets referenced in paragraph (j) of this
AD will be provided by Airbus, as specified in Section 2., of Airbus
AOTs A310A55-2035 and A300-600 55A6035, both dated March 16, 2005.
Parts Installation
(j) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install
on any airplane a CFRP rudder, P/N A55471500 series, unless the
requirements specified in paragraphs (f), (h) and (i) of this AD
have been accomplished.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(k) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance
with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(l) French airworthiness directive UF-2005-048, dated March 18,
2005, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) You must use Airbus All Operators Telex A310A55-2035, dated
March 16, 2005; and Airbus All Operators Telex A300-600 55A6035,
dated March 16, 2005; as applicable; to perform the actions that are
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director
of the Federal Register approves the incorporation by reference of
these documents in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. For copies of the service information, contact Airbus, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. To view the AD
docket go to the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-401, Nassif
Building, Washington, DC. To review copies of the service
information, go to the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_
locations.html.
[[Page 15580]]
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 23, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-6106 Filed 3-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P