Pistachios Grown in California; Establishment of Reporting Requirements; Notice of Request for New Information Collection, 15602-15606 [05-6082]
Download as PDF
15602
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 58
Monday, March 28, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the publication on
March 22, 2005 (70 FR 14477), is
corrected as follows:
1. On page 14427, in the heading,
third line, the new DHS docket number
should read: ‘‘DHS Docket Number
DHS–2005–0016.’’
Mary Kate Whalen,
Deputy Associate General Counsel for
Regulations, Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05–6052 Filed 3–23–05; 4:33 pm]
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
BILLING CODE 4410–10–P
[DHS–2005–0016]
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation of
Exemptions; Correction
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of the Secretary, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
Agricultural Marketing Service
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) is correcting a notice of
proposed rulemaking that was
published in the Federal Register on
March 22, 2005, at 70 FR 14427 which
gives notice that DHS is concurrently
establishing a new system of records
pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 for
the Bureau of Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Student and Exchange
Visitor Program. In that proposed
rulemaking, the Department proposes to
exempt portions of this system of
records from one or more provisions of
the Privacy Act because of criminal,
civil and administrative enforcement
requirements. In the Heading of the
proposed rulemaking, DHS
inadvertently mislabeled the DHS
docket number associated with the
rulemaking. DHS would like to
announce that the DHS docket number
for submitting comments via to this
notice is DHS–2005–0016. Directions for
submitting comments using this method
are outlined within 70 FR 14427.
DATES: This correction is issued as of
March 28, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Ament, Department of Homeland
Security Regulatory Coordinator,
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528, (202) 205–8088.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Docket No. FV05–983–1 PR]
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
Need for Correction
As published in the Federal Register
on March 22, 2005 (70 FR 14427), the
document contains an error that is in
need of correction.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:06 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
7 CFR Part 983
Pistachios Grown in California;
Establishment of Reporting
Requirements; Notice of Request for
New Information Collection
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule invites comments
on the establishment of reporting
requirements authorized under the
California pistachio marketing order
(order). The order regulates the handling
of pistachios grown in California and is
administered locally by the
Administrative Committee for
Pistachios (committee). These
additional reporting requirements
would enable the committee to collect
information on: Pistachios failing to
meet quality and aflatoxin requirements;
failing pistachios that are reworked or
disposed of in accordance with
applicable requirements; handlers
applying for exemptions; transfers of
uninspected pistachios between
regulated handlers; and inventories and
shipments of pistachios. This document
also announces the Agricultural
Marketing Service’s (AMS) intention to
request approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) of a
new information collection.
DATES: Comments must be received by
May 27, 2005. Pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on
the information collection burden must
be received by May 27, 2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938, or
E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or
can be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose
Aguayo, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street,
Suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721;
Telephone: (559) 487–5901, Fax: (559)
487–5906; or George Kelhart, Technical
Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal is issued under Marketing
Order No. 983 (7 CFR part 983),
regulating the handling of pistachios
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This proposal
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Proposed Rules
will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposal invites comments on
establishing reporting requirements
authorized under the California
pistachio order. The additional
reporting requirements would enable
the committee to collect information on:
(1) Pistachios failing to meet quality and
aflatoxin requirements; (2) failing
pistachios that are reworked or disposed
under the marketing order; (3) handlers
applying for exemptions; (4) transfers of
uninspected pistachios between
regulated handlers; and (5) inventories
and shipments of pistachios. In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), this notice also announces
AMS’s intention to request approval
from OMB for a new information
collection. The information collected
would facilitate administration of the
marketing order.
Sections 983.38, 983.39, and 983.40 of
the pistachio order specify maximum
aflatoxin requirements, minimum
quality requirements, and failed lot
rework and disposition procedures,
respectively.
Sections 983.41 of the pistachio order
provides exemptions for certain
aflatoxin and quality testing
requirements for handlers who handle
less than 1,000,000 pounds of assessed
weight pistachios per marketing year
(September 1–August 31).
Section 983.47 of the pistachio order
provides authority to require handlers to
furnish such reports and information on
such forms as are needed to enable
USDA and the committee to perform
their functions and enforce order
provisions.
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:47 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Section 983.70 of the pistachio order
exempts handlers who handle 1,000
pounds or less of dried weight
pistachios (dried to 5 percent moisture)
from all aflatoxin and minimum quality
requirements.
Under these authorities, the
committee, at its November 3, 2004,
meeting unanimously recommended
establishing a new subpart ‘‘Rules and
Regulations,’’ and a new section entitled
‘‘§ 983.147—Reports’’ to delineate and
define six new forms, ACP–2 through
ACP–7. The committee further clarified
this recommendation at its December
15, 2004, meeting.
Detailed information on the burdens
created by these new forms is discussed
later in this document.
The recommended forms, ACP–2
through ACP–7, would be used by the
committee to track pistachios that fail to
meet minimum quality and maximum
aflatoxin requirements (ACP–2); track
lots which have been reworked or
disposed of in accordance with
marketing order requirements (ACP–3);
identify handlers who handle 1,000
dried pounds or less of pistachios per
production year (September 1–August
31) (ACP–4) and properly apply
marketing order exemptions; identify
handlers who handle less than
1,000,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios per marketing year
(September 1–August 31) (ACP–5) and
properly apply marketing order
exemptions; track uninspected
pistachios that are transferred between
regulated handlers (ACP–6); and track
monthly shipments and handler
inventories (ACP–7).
The majority of the forms
recommended by the committee (ACP–
2 through APC–6) are new reporting
requirements, and do not duplicate
information collected by any other
Federal agency. One form, ACP–7 is
similar to a report required by the
California Pistachio Commission
(commission), a program overseen by
the State of California, under which
California pistachio research and
promotion activities are implemented.
Because the commission is prohibited
from sharing confidential handler
information, the committee
recommended the ACP–7 be
implemented for committee use to
provide information necessary to
administer the order. Because shipment
and inventory data is already compiled
by handlers for the commission,
handlers may attach the commission
report to the committee form to meet
this new reporting requirement. Thus,
handlers would not be duplicating their
efforts and both agencies would receive
necessary data for respective program
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15603
purposes. Further, the information
collection does not duplicate that
collected by any other Federal agency.
The committee estimates that this
action would impact no more than 20
handlers of pistachios, and further
estimates that, on average, a handler
would expend no more than an average
of 11.8 minutes in completing each
form. The total estimated annual burden
for all six forms is estimated to be 92.4
hours.
The committee believes that these
forms are easy to prepare and file, and
place as small a reporting burden as
possible on handlers. These forms and
their respective burdens were discussed
at public meetings at which all affected
entities were encouraged to comment on
the effect of requiring these forms to be
completed and filed by pistachio
handlers. The Committee vote was
unanimous, with 8 in favor and none
opposed or abstaining.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
AMS has considered the economic
impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses would not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 20 handlers
of California pistachios subject to
regulation under the order and
approximately 741 producers in the
production area. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $5,000,000. Eight of the 20
handlers subject to regulation have
annual pistachio receipts of at least
$5,000,000. In addition, 722 producers
have annual receipts less than $750,000.
Thus, the majority of handlers and
producers of California pistachios may
be classified as small entities. There are
an estimated eight USDA approved
testing laboratories that may participate
in this program. At least half are handler
in-house operations and already
included in the estimated respondents.
Other testing laboratories are
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
15604
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Proposed Rules
government agencies. One other existing
laboratory is part of the Dried Fruit
Association of California. We do not
have specific information but believe
that this association would be
considered a small entity.
This proposal invites comments on
establishing reporting requirements
authorized under the California
pistachio order. These additional
reporting requirements would enable
the committee to collect information on:
(1) Pistachios failing to meet quality and
aflatoxin requirements; (2) failing
pistachios that are reworked or disposed
of in marketing order requirements; (3)
handlers applying for exemptions; (4)
transfers of uninspected pistachios
between regulated handlers; and (5)
inventories and shipments of pistachios.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), this notice also announces
AMS’s intention to request approval
from OMB for this new information
collection. The information collected
would facilitate proper implementation
of the marketing order.
Sections 983.38, 983.39, and 983.40 of
the pistachio order provide maximum
aflatoxin requirements, and minimum
quality requirements, and failed lot
rework and disposition procedures,
respectively.
Sections 983.41 of the pistachio order
provides exemptions for certain
aflatoxin and quality testing
requirements for handlers who handle
less than 1,000,000 pounds of assessed
weight pistachios per marketing year
(September 1–August 31).
Section 983.47 of the pistachio order
provides authority for the committee to
require handlers to furnish such reports
and information on such forms as are
needed to enable the Secretary of
Agriculture and the committee to
perform their functions and enforce
order provisions.
Section 983.70 of the pistachio order
exempts handlers who handle 1,000
pounds or less of dried weight
pistachios (dried to 5 percent moisture)
from all aflatoxin and minimum quality
requirements.
Under these authorities, the
committee, at its November 3, 2004,
meeting, unanimously recommended
establishing a new subpart ‘‘Rules and
Regulations,’’ and a new section entitled
‘‘§ 983.147—Reports’’ to delineate and
define six new forms, ACP–2 through
ACP–7. The committee further clarified
this recommendation at its December
15, 2004, meeting.
The majority of the reports
recommended by the committee are new
reporting requirements (ACP–2 through
APC–6). One form, ACP–7 is similar to
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:47 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
a report required by the commission, a
program overseen by the State of
California, under which California
pistachio research and promotion
activities are implemented.
The committee debated the overall
merits of the forms at its meetings,
deliberating over the value of the
information to be collected relative to
the burden which each form would
impose on the regulated handlers. In the
end, the committee concluded that the
information that would be collected is
necessary to properly administer the
marketing order. It further concluded
that the burden was relatively small
compared to the benefits that would be
accrued by the committee and industry
from the information obtained.
The committee discussed alternatives
to establishing these reporting
requirements including not adopting
ACP–4, as it was believed that this
information might be obtained by staff
during compliance audits. Upon
reviewing the auditing procedure,
committee members determined that
utilization of the ACP–4 would be a
more feasible means of obtaining
information on identifying exempt
handlers. Thus, the committee
unanimously recommended all six
forms for implementation. It believes
that the information to be provided on
each of the recommended forms would
be important to the administration of
the order and would enhance committee
operations.
Further, the committee’s meetings
were widely publicized throughout the
pistachio industry and all interested
persons were encouraged to attend the
meetings and participate in the
committee’s deliberations. Like all
committee meetings, the November 3
and December 15, 2004, meetings were
public meetings and entities of all sizes
were invited to express their views on
these issues.
Finally, interested persons are invited
to submit information on the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this rule. A detailed discussion of the
six new forms follows.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), AMS announces its
intention to request an approval of a
new information collection for the
marketing order regulating pistachios
grown in California.
Title: Pistachios Grown in California;
Marketing Order No. 983.
OMB Number: 0581–New.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: These information
collection requirements are essential to
carry out the intent of the Act, to
provide the respondents the type of
service they request, and to administer
the California pistachio marketing order
program which has been operating since
2004.
On November 3, 2004, the Committee
unanimously recommended the
establishment of a new subpart—‘‘Rules
and Regulations,’’ and a new section,
‘‘§ 983.147—Reports.’’ The Committee
further clarified this recommendation at
its December 15, 2004, meeting. Section
983.147 would require handlers and
certain USDA approved testing
laboratories to file up to six forms.
These forms would enable the
committee to obtain information on:
Pistachios failing to meet quality and
aflatoxin requirements; pistachios that
are reworked and disposed of in
marketing channels; transfers of
uninspected pistachios between
regulated handlers; shipments and
inventories of pistachios and related
information, and identify handlers
eligible for marketing order exemptions.
Approximately half of the handlers (8 of
20 estimated handlers and the Dried
Fruit Association of California) have the
capability to file reports electronically.
There are an estimated eight testing
laboratories. At least half are handler inhouse operations which are included in
the estimated respondents. Other testing
laboratories are government agencies.
OMB does not require government
agencies to be reported as respondents
for the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act. One other existing
laboratory is part of the Dried Fruit
Association of California, which is
included as part of the estimate of
respondents.
The information collected would be
used only by authorized representatives
of the USDA, including AMS, Fruit and
Vegetable Program regional and
headquarters staff, and authorized
committee employees. Authorized
committee employees are the primary
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Proposed Rules
users of the information and AMS is the
secondary user. Such information
would be kept confidential in
accordance with the Act and order.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 5.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 20 hours.
Total Annual Estimated Burden
ACP–4 FMO Exempt Handler
Notification Report Form
The total burden for the proposed
information collection under the order
is as follows:
Estimate of Total Burden per
Response: Public reporting burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average less than 11.8
minutes.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 20
(handlers and one laboratory).
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 23.6 responses per handler
per form.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 92.4 hours.
Estimated Annual Burden for Each
Form
For each new form, the proposed
request for approval of the new
information collection under the order
is as follows:
ACP–2
Failed Lot Notification Form
Handlers would use this form to
notify the committee of the failure of a
lot of pistachios to pass minimum size/
quality requirements under the order.
USDA certified aflatoxin laboratories
would use this form to notify the
committee of the failure of a lot of
pistachios that exceeds the maximum
aflatoxin requirements under the order.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 12 minutes per
response.
Respondents: Persons who handle
California pistachios and testing
laboratory(s).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
20.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 5.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 20 hours.
ACP–3 Failed Lot Disposition and
Rework Report Form
Handlers would use this form to
notify the committee of the disposition
or reworking of failed lots. This would
enable the committee to verify that
failed lots were disposed of in
accordance with the marketing order.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 12 minutes per
response.
Respondents: Persons who handle
California pistachios.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
20.
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:47 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Handlers would use this form to
notify the committee that they handled
1,000 pounds or less of dried pistachios
during any marketing year (September 1
to August 31). Dried pistachios are those
pistachios which have been dried to
approximately 5 percent moisture.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 6 minutes per
response.
Respondents: Persons who handle
California pistachios.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
10.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 1 hour.
ACP–5
Minimal Testing Report Form
Handlers who handle less than
1,000,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios in a production year
(September 1–August 31) would use this
form to apply for committee approval to
operate under the order’s minimal
quantities provisions.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 6 minutes per
response.
Respondents: Persons who handle
less than 1,000,000 pounds of assessed
weight California pistachios in the
production year.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
10.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 1 hour.
ACP–6
Inter-Handler Transfer Report
Handlers would use this form to
notify the committee that they had
transferred uninspected pistachios
within the production area to another
handler within the production area.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 12 minutes per
response.
Respondents: Persons who transfer or
receive uninspected California
pistachios within the production area.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
12.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 2.4 hours.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15605
ACP–7 Monthly Report of Inventory/
Shipments
Handlers would use this form to
report their monthly inventory and
domestic shipments of pistachios.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 12 minutes per
response.
Respondents: Persons who handle
California pistachios.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
20.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 12.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 48 hours.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(1) Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information would have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments should reference OMB No.
0581–New and the Marketing Order for
Pistachios Grown in California, and be
sent to the USDA in care of the Docket
Clerk at the previously-mentioned
address. All comments timely received
will be available for public inspection
during regular business hours at the
same address.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments
received will become a matter of public
record and will be available for public
inspection during regular business
hours at the same address or at https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Once
the Web site page is opened, click on
‘‘pistachios’’ and find the docket
number of this rule. Any comments
received regarding this rule will be
found in the ‘‘Comments’’ link. If no
comments have been received in
response to a rule, there will be no
‘‘Comments’’ link available.
In summary, this proposal would
establish reporting requirements
authorized under the California
pistachio order. These additional
reporting requirements would enable
the committee to collect information on:
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
15606
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 58 / Monday, March 28, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(1) Pistachios failing to meet quality and
aflatoxin requirements; (2) failing
pistachios that are reworked or disposed
of in accordance with marketing order
requirements; (3) handlers applying for
exemptions; (4) transfers of uninspected
pistachios between regulated handlers;
and (5) inventories and shipments of
pistachios. Additionally, it would allow
the Committee to obtain accurate
information for preparation of the
annual marketing policy statement, as
required under the order. Any
comments received will be considered
prior to finalization of this rule.
Another form, ACP 1, was not
included with this approval request
because that form was part of a previous
request, published in the Federal
Register on December 10, 2004 (69 FR
71749). This form would be included in
the order at § 983.253, at such time that
it is approved.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Pistachios, Marketing agreements and
orders, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 983 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 983—PISTACHIOS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 983 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In part 983, a new subpart titled
‘‘Subpart—Rules and Regulations’’
consisting of § 983.147 is added to read
as follows:
Subpart—Rules and Regulations
§ 983.147
Reports.
(a) ACP–2, failed lot notification. Each
handler shall notify the Administrative
Committee for Pistachios (committee) of
all lots which fail to meet the order’s
minimum quality requirements by
completing sections A and B of this
form. Handlers shall furnish this report
to the committee no later than 10 days
after test completion. Each USDA
approved aflatoxin testing laboratory
shall complete section C of this report
and forward this report and the failing
aflatoxin test results to the committee
and to the handler within 10 days of the
test failure.
(b) ACP–3, failed lot disposition and
rework report. Each handler who
reworks a failing lot of pistachios shall
complete this report and shall forward
it to the committee no later than 10 days
after the rework is completed. If rework
is not selected as a remedy, the handler
shall submit the form to the committee
VerDate jul<14>2003
12:47 Mar 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
office within 10 days of disposition of
the lot.
(c) ACP–4, Federal marketing order
exempt handler notification. Each
handler who handles 1,000 pounds or
less of dried weight pistachios in a
production year shall complete and
furnish this report to the committee no
later than November 15 of each
production year.
(d) ACP–5, minimal testing form. Each
handler who handles less than
1,000,000 pounds of dried weight
pistachios in a production year and who
would like to request an exemption
under the minimal quantities provisions
(Section 983.41) of the order shall
furnish this report to the committee
office no later than August 1 of each
production year.
(e) ACP–6, inter-handler transfer.
Each handler who transfers uninspected
pistachios to another handler within the
production area shall complete the
ACP–6 and sign Part A. The transferring
handler shall forward the original ACP–
6 and one copy to the handler who
receives the uninspected pistachios. The
transferring handler shall furnish one
copy of ACP–6 to the committee within
30 days of the transfer. The handler
receiving the uninspected pistachios
(receiving handler) shall sign Part B of
the original ACP–6 and shall file it with
the committee within 30 days of the
transfer.
(f) ACP–7, monthly report of
inventory/shipments. Each handler of
pistachios shall file this report with the
committee by the 10th day of each
month for the previous month’s
inventory and shipment information.
(g) Exemptions. Handlers, who handle
1,000 pounds or less of dried pistachios
during any marketing year, are exempt
from filing all forms with the exception
of the ACP–4.
(h) Records. Each handler shall
maintain all records of pistachios
received, held, shipped, and disposed of
for at least 3 years following each crop
year to show compliance with the
marketing order provisions.
Dated: March 23, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–6082 Filed 3–23–05; 3:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20616; Airspace
Docket No. 05–ANM–04]
RIN 2120–AA66
Proposed Amendment to Restricted
Area 2211 Blair Lakes; AK
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action proposes to raise
the ceiling of Restricted Area 2211 (R–
2211), Blair Lakes, AK, from the current
18,000 feet above mean sea level (MSL)
to Flight Level (FL) 310. The expanded
airspace is required to fulfill United
States Air Force (USAF) training
requirements. The current restricted
airspace at Blair Lakes is too small to
allow aircrew training in high altitude
weapons delivery tactics. Specifically,
the training requirements call for
practicing the release of weapons from
higher altitudes than are currently
available within the existing restricted
airspace.
Comments must be received on
or before May 12, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the Docket Management
System, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001. You must identify FAA
Docket No. FAA–2005–20616 and
Airspace Docket No. 05–ANM–04, at the
beginning of your comments. You may
also submit comments through the
Internet at https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken
McElroy, Airspace and Rules, Office of
System Operations and Safety, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202)
267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
E:\FR\FM\28MRP1.SGM
28MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 58 (Monday, March 28, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15602-15606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6082]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Docket No. FV05-983-1 PR]
Pistachios Grown in California; Establishment of Reporting
Requirements; Notice of Request for New Information Collection
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule invites comments on the establishment of reporting
requirements authorized under the California pistachio marketing order
(order). The order regulates the handling of pistachios grown in
California and is administered locally by the Administrative Committee
for Pistachios (committee). These additional reporting requirements
would enable the committee to collect information on: Pistachios
failing to meet quality and aflatoxin requirements; failing pistachios
that are reworked or disposed of in accordance with applicable
requirements; handlers applying for exemptions; transfers of
uninspected pistachios between regulated handlers; and inventories and
shipments of pistachios. This document also announces the Agricultural
Marketing Service's (AMS) intention to request approval from the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) of a new information collection.
DATES: Comments must be received by May 27, 2005. Pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on the information collection burden
must be received by May 27, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov,
or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference
the docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the
Federal Register and will be made available for public inspection in
the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be
viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Aguayo, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102B,
Fresno, California 93721; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-
5906; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal is issued under Marketing
Order No. 983 (7 CFR part 983), regulating the handling of pistachios
grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The
order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of
1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This proposal
[[Page 15603]]
will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies,
unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposal invites comments on establishing reporting
requirements authorized under the California pistachio order. The
additional reporting requirements would enable the committee to collect
information on: (1) Pistachios failing to meet quality and aflatoxin
requirements; (2) failing pistachios that are reworked or disposed
under the marketing order; (3) handlers applying for exemptions; (4)
transfers of uninspected pistachios between regulated handlers; and (5)
inventories and shipments of pistachios. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), this notice
also announces AMS's intention to request approval from OMB for a new
information collection. The information collected would facilitate
administration of the marketing order.
Sections 983.38, 983.39, and 983.40 of the pistachio order specify
maximum aflatoxin requirements, minimum quality requirements, and
failed lot rework and disposition procedures, respectively.
Sections 983.41 of the pistachio order provides exemptions for
certain aflatoxin and quality testing requirements for handlers who
handle less than 1,000,000 pounds of assessed weight pistachios per
marketing year (September 1-August 31).
Section 983.47 of the pistachio order provides authority to require
handlers to furnish such reports and information on such forms as are
needed to enable USDA and the committee to perform their functions and
enforce order provisions.
Section 983.70 of the pistachio order exempts handlers who handle
1,000 pounds or less of dried weight pistachios (dried to 5 percent
moisture) from all aflatoxin and minimum quality requirements.
Under these authorities, the committee, at its November 3, 2004,
meeting unanimously recommended establishing a new subpart ``Rules and
Regulations,'' and a new section entitled ``Sec. 983.147--Reports'' to
delineate and define six new forms, ACP-2 through ACP-7. The committee
further clarified this recommendation at its December 15, 2004,
meeting.
Detailed information on the burdens created by these new forms is
discussed later in this document.
The recommended forms, ACP-2 through ACP-7, would be used by the
committee to track pistachios that fail to meet minimum quality and
maximum aflatoxin requirements (ACP-2); track lots which have been
reworked or disposed of in accordance with marketing order requirements
(ACP-3); identify handlers who handle 1,000 dried pounds or less of
pistachios per production year (September 1-August 31) (ACP-4) and
properly apply marketing order exemptions; identify handlers who handle
less than 1,000,000 pounds of assessed weight pistachios per marketing
year (September 1-August 31) (ACP-5) and properly apply marketing order
exemptions; track uninspected pistachios that are transferred between
regulated handlers (ACP-6); and track monthly shipments and handler
inventories (ACP-7).
The majority of the forms recommended by the committee (ACP-2
through APC-6) are new reporting requirements, and do not duplicate
information collected by any other Federal agency. One form, ACP-7 is
similar to a report required by the California Pistachio Commission
(commission), a program overseen by the State of California, under
which California pistachio research and promotion activities are
implemented. Because the commission is prohibited from sharing
confidential handler information, the committee recommended the ACP-7
be implemented for committee use to provide information necessary to
administer the order. Because shipment and inventory data is already
compiled by handlers for the commission, handlers may attach the
commission report to the committee form to meet this new reporting
requirement. Thus, handlers would not be duplicating their efforts and
both agencies would receive necessary data for respective program
purposes. Further, the information collection does not duplicate that
collected by any other Federal agency.
The committee estimates that this action would impact no more than
20 handlers of pistachios, and further estimates that, on average, a
handler would expend no more than an average of 11.8 minutes in
completing each form. The total estimated annual burden for all six
forms is estimated to be 92.4 hours.
The committee believes that these forms are easy to prepare and
file, and place as small a reporting burden as possible on handlers.
These forms and their respective burdens were discussed at public
meetings at which all affected entities were encouraged to comment on
the effect of requiring these forms to be completed and filed by
pistachio handlers. The Committee vote was unanimous, with 8 in favor
and none opposed or abstaining.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), AMS has considered the economic impact of this action on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses would
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 20 handlers of California pistachios
subject to regulation under the order and approximately 741 producers
in the production area. Small agricultural producers are defined by the
Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are
defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000. Eight
of the 20 handlers subject to regulation have annual pistachio receipts
of at least $5,000,000. In addition, 722 producers have annual receipts
less than $750,000. Thus, the majority of handlers and producers of
California pistachios may be classified as small entities. There are an
estimated eight USDA approved testing laboratories that may participate
in this program. At least half are handler in-house operations and
already included in the estimated respondents. Other testing
laboratories are
[[Page 15604]]
government agencies. One other existing laboratory is part of the Dried
Fruit Association of California. We do not have specific information
but believe that this association would be considered a small entity.
This proposal invites comments on establishing reporting
requirements authorized under the California pistachio order. These
additional reporting requirements would enable the committee to collect
information on: (1) Pistachios failing to meet quality and aflatoxin
requirements; (2) failing pistachios that are reworked or disposed of
in marketing order requirements; (3) handlers applying for exemptions;
(4) transfers of uninspected pistachios between regulated handlers; and
(5) inventories and shipments of pistachios. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), this notice
also announces AMS's intention to request approval from OMB for this
new information collection. The information collected would facilitate
proper implementation of the marketing order.
Sections 983.38, 983.39, and 983.40 of the pistachio order provide
maximum aflatoxin requirements, and minimum quality requirements, and
failed lot rework and disposition procedures, respectively.
Sections 983.41 of the pistachio order provides exemptions for
certain aflatoxin and quality testing requirements for handlers who
handle less than 1,000,000 pounds of assessed weight pistachios per
marketing year (September 1-August 31).
Section 983.47 of the pistachio order provides authority for the
committee to require handlers to furnish such reports and information
on such forms as are needed to enable the Secretary of Agriculture and
the committee to perform their functions and enforce order provisions.
Section 983.70 of the pistachio order exempts handlers who handle
1,000 pounds or less of dried weight pistachios (dried to 5 percent
moisture) from all aflatoxin and minimum quality requirements.
Under these authorities, the committee, at its November 3, 2004,
meeting, unanimously recommended establishing a new subpart ``Rules and
Regulations,'' and a new section entitled ``Sec. 983.147--Reports'' to
delineate and define six new forms, ACP-2 through ACP-7. The committee
further clarified this recommendation at its December 15, 2004,
meeting.
The majority of the reports recommended by the committee are new
reporting requirements (ACP-2 through APC-6). One form, ACP-7 is
similar to a report required by the commission, a program overseen by
the State of California, under which California pistachio research and
promotion activities are implemented.
The committee debated the overall merits of the forms at its
meetings, deliberating over the value of the information to be
collected relative to the burden which each form would impose on the
regulated handlers. In the end, the committee concluded that the
information that would be collected is necessary to properly administer
the marketing order. It further concluded that the burden was
relatively small compared to the benefits that would be accrued by the
committee and industry from the information obtained.
The committee discussed alternatives to establishing these
reporting requirements including not adopting ACP-4, as it was believed
that this information might be obtained by staff during compliance
audits. Upon reviewing the auditing procedure, committee members
determined that utilization of the ACP-4 would be a more feasible means
of obtaining information on identifying exempt handlers. Thus, the
committee unanimously recommended all six forms for implementation. It
believes that the information to be provided on each of the recommended
forms would be important to the administration of the order and would
enhance committee operations.
Further, the committee's meetings were widely publicized throughout
the pistachio industry and all interested persons were encouraged to
attend the meetings and participate in the committee's deliberations.
Like all committee meetings, the November 3 and December 15, 2004,
meetings were public meetings and entities of all sizes were invited to
express their views on these issues.
Finally, interested persons are invited to submit information on
the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small
businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with this rule. A detailed discussion of the six new forms
follows.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), AMS announces its intention to request an approval of a
new information collection for the marketing order regulating
pistachios grown in California.
Title: Pistachios Grown in California; Marketing Order No. 983.
OMB Number: 0581-New.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: These information collection requirements are essential
to carry out the intent of the Act, to provide the respondents the type
of service they request, and to administer the California pistachio
marketing order program which has been operating since 2004.
On November 3, 2004, the Committee unanimously recommended the
establishment of a new subpart--``Rules and Regulations,'' and a new
section, ``Sec. 983.147--Reports.'' The Committee further clarified
this recommendation at its December 15, 2004, meeting. Section 983.147
would require handlers and certain USDA approved testing laboratories
to file up to six forms. These forms would enable the committee to
obtain information on: Pistachios failing to meet quality and aflatoxin
requirements; pistachios that are reworked and disposed of in marketing
channels; transfers of uninspected pistachios between regulated
handlers; shipments and inventories of pistachios and related
information, and identify handlers eligible for marketing order
exemptions. Approximately half of the handlers (8 of 20 estimated
handlers and the Dried Fruit Association of California) have the
capability to file reports electronically. There are an estimated eight
testing laboratories. At least half are handler in-house operations
which are included in the estimated respondents. Other testing
laboratories are government agencies. OMB does not require government
agencies to be reported as respondents for the purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act. One other existing laboratory is part of the
Dried Fruit Association of California, which is included as part of the
estimate of respondents.
The information collected would be used only by authorized
representatives of the USDA, including AMS, Fruit and Vegetable Program
regional and headquarters staff, and authorized committee employees.
Authorized committee employees are the primary
[[Page 15605]]
users of the information and AMS is the secondary user. Such
information would be kept confidential in accordance with the Act and
order.
Total Annual Estimated Burden
The total burden for the proposed information collection under the
order is as follows:
Estimate of Total Burden per Response: Public reporting burden for
this collection of information is estimated to average less than 11.8
minutes.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 20 (handlers and one laboratory).
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 23.6 responses per
handler per form.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 92.4 hours.
Estimated Annual Burden for Each Form
For each new form, the proposed request for approval of the new
information collection under the order is as follows:
ACP-2 Failed Lot Notification Form
Handlers would use this form to notify the committee of the failure
of a lot of pistachios to pass minimum size/quality requirements under
the order. USDA certified aflatoxin laboratories would use this form to
notify the committee of the failure of a lot of pistachios that exceeds
the maximum aflatoxin requirements under the order.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 12 minutes per response.
Respondents: Persons who handle California pistachios and testing
laboratory(s).
Estimated Number of Respondents: 20.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 5.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 20 hours.
ACP-3 Failed Lot Disposition and Rework Report Form
Handlers would use this form to notify the committee of the
disposition or reworking of failed lots. This would enable the
committee to verify that failed lots were disposed of in accordance
with the marketing order.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 12 minutes per response.
Respondents: Persons who handle California pistachios.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 20.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 5.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 20 hours.
ACP-4 FMO Exempt Handler Notification Report Form
Handlers would use this form to notify the committee that they
handled 1,000 pounds or less of dried pistachios during any marketing
year (September 1 to August 31). Dried pistachios are those pistachios
which have been dried to approximately 5 percent moisture.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 6 minutes per response.
Respondents: Persons who handle California pistachios.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 10.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1 hour.
ACP-5 Minimal Testing Report Form
Handlers who handle less than 1,000,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios in a production year (September 1-August 31) would use this
form to apply for committee approval to operate under the order's
minimal quantities provisions.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 6 minutes per response.
Respondents: Persons who handle less than 1,000,000 pounds of
assessed weight California pistachios in the production year.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 10.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1 hour.
ACP-6 Inter-Handler Transfer Report
Handlers would use this form to notify the committee that they had
transferred uninspected pistachios within the production area to
another handler within the production area.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 12 minutes per response.
Respondents: Persons who transfer or receive uninspected California
pistachios within the production area.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 12.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 2.4 hours.
ACP-7 Monthly Report of Inventory/Shipments
Handlers would use this form to report their monthly inventory and
domestic shipments of pistachios.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 12 minutes per response.
Respondents: Persons who handle California pistachios.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 20.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 12.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 48 hours.
Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information would have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
Comments should reference OMB No. 0581-New and the Marketing Order
for Pistachios Grown in California, and be sent to the USDA in care of
the Docket Clerk at the previously-mentioned address. All comments
timely received will be available for public inspection during regular
business hours at the same address.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval. All comments received will become a matter of
public record and will be available for public inspection during
regular business hours at the same address or at https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Once the Web site page is opened, click
on ``pistachios'' and find the docket number of this rule. Any comments
received regarding this rule will be found in the ``Comments'' link. If
no comments have been received in response to a rule, there will be no
``Comments'' link available.
In summary, this proposal would establish reporting requirements
authorized under the California pistachio order. These additional
reporting requirements would enable the committee to collect
information on:
[[Page 15606]]
(1) Pistachios failing to meet quality and aflatoxin requirements; (2)
failing pistachios that are reworked or disposed of in accordance with
marketing order requirements; (3) handlers applying for exemptions; (4)
transfers of uninspected pistachios between regulated handlers; and (5)
inventories and shipments of pistachios. Additionally, it would allow
the Committee to obtain accurate information for preparation of the
annual marketing policy statement, as required under the order. Any
comments received will be considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
Another form, ACP 1, was not included with this approval request
because that form was part of a previous request, published in the
Federal Register on December 10, 2004 (69 FR 71749). This form would be
included in the order at Sec. 983.253, at such time that it is
approved.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Pistachios, Marketing agreements and orders, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 983 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 983--PISTACHIOS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 983 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. In part 983, a new subpart titled ``Subpart--Rules and
Regulations'' consisting of Sec. 983.147 is added to read as follows:
Subpart--Rules and Regulations
Sec. 983.147 Reports.
(a) ACP-2, failed lot notification. Each handler shall notify the
Administrative Committee for Pistachios (committee) of all lots which
fail to meet the order's minimum quality requirements by completing
sections A and B of this form. Handlers shall furnish this report to
the committee no later than 10 days after test completion. Each USDA
approved aflatoxin testing laboratory shall complete section C of this
report and forward this report and the failing aflatoxin test results
to the committee and to the handler within 10 days of the test failure.
(b) ACP-3, failed lot disposition and rework report. Each handler
who reworks a failing lot of pistachios shall complete this report and
shall forward it to the committee no later than 10 days after the
rework is completed. If rework is not selected as a remedy, the handler
shall submit the form to the committee office within 10 days of
disposition of the lot.
(c) ACP-4, Federal marketing order exempt handler notification.
Each handler who handles 1,000 pounds or less of dried weight
pistachios in a production year shall complete and furnish this report
to the committee no later than November 15 of each production year.
(d) ACP-5, minimal testing form. Each handler who handles less than
1,000,000 pounds of dried weight pistachios in a production year and
who would like to request an exemption under the minimal quantities
provisions (Section 983.41) of the order shall furnish this report to
the committee office no later than August 1 of each production year.
(e) ACP-6, inter-handler transfer. Each handler who transfers
uninspected pistachios to another handler within the production area
shall complete the ACP-6 and sign Part A. The transferring handler
shall forward the original ACP-6 and one copy to the handler who
receives the uninspected pistachios. The transferring handler shall
furnish one copy of ACP-6 to the committee within 30 days of the
transfer. The handler receiving the uninspected pistachios (receiving
handler) shall sign Part B of the original ACP-6 and shall file it with
the committee within 30 days of the transfer.
(f) ACP-7, monthly report of inventory/shipments. Each handler of
pistachios shall file this report with the committee by the 10th day of
each month for the previous month's inventory and shipment information.
(g) Exemptions. Handlers, who handle 1,000 pounds or less of dried
pistachios during any marketing year, are exempt from filing all forms
with the exception of the ACP-4.
(h) Records. Each handler shall maintain all records of pistachios
received, held, shipped, and disposed of for at least 3 years following
each crop year to show compliance with the marketing order provisions.
Dated: March 23, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-6082 Filed 3-23-05; 3:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P