Information Collection Renewal Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Approval Under the Paperwork Reduction Act; OMB Control Number 1018-0101; Monitoring Recovered Species After Delisting As Required Under Section 4(g) of the Endangered Species Act-American Peregrine Falcon, 15344-15346 [05-5955]
Download as PDF
15344
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 57 / Friday, March 25, 2005 / Notices
Services has funded a Coordinating
Center to Support State Incentive Grants
to Build Capacity for Alternatives to
Restraint and Seclusion. The grants are
designed to promote the
implementation and evaluation of best
practice approaches to reducing the use
of restraint and seclusion in mental
health facilities. Grantees consist of 8
sites (state mental health agencies), most
of which will be implementing
interventions in multiple facilities (a
total of 76 facilities). These include
facilities serving adults and those
serving children and/or adolescents,
with various subgroups such as forensic
and sexual offender populations.
With input from multiple experts in
the field of restraint and seclusion and
alternatives to restraint and seclusion,
the project created a common core of
data collection instruments that will be
used for this cross-site project. The
facilities will complete four different
instruments: (1) Facility/Program
Characteristics Inventory (information
about type of facilities, characteristics of
persons served, staffing patterns, and
unit specific data); (2) Inventory of
Seclusion and Restraint Reduction
Interventions; (3) Treatment Episode
Data (admission data for all clients/
patients); and (4) Event Data (data about
the use of restraint and seclusion). Data
Number of
respondents
Instrument
will be submitted by the sites
electronically via a secured Web site.
The Facility/Program Characteristic
Inventory and Inventory of Seclusion
and Restraint Reduction Intervention
will be collected annually. The
Treatment Episode Data and Event Data
will be collected monthly.
The resulting data will help to
identify the: (1) Number of programs
adopting best practices involving
alternative approaches to restraint and
seclusion; and (2) program’s impact of
reducing restraint and seclusion use and
adoption of alternative practices. The
estimated annual response burden to
collect this information is as follows:
Responses/
respondent
Burden/response
(hours)
Annual burden
(hours)
Facility/Program Characteristic Inventory ........................................
Inventory Of Seclusion And Restraint Reduction Interventions ......
Treatment Episode Data ..................................................................
Event Data .......................................................................................
76
76
76
76
1
1
12
12
4
2
8
8
304
152
7,296
7,296
Total ..........................................................................................
76
............................
............................
15,048
Send comments to Summer King,
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
Room 7–1044, 1 Choke Cherry Road,
Rockville, MD 20850. Written comments
should be received by May 24, 2005.
Dated: March 21, 2005.
Anna Marsh,
Executive Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 05–5914 Filed 3–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–4980–N–12]
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
To Assist the Homeless
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
call the toll-free Title V information line
at 1–800–927–7588.
In
accordance with the December 12, 1988
court order in National Coalition for the
Homeless v. Veterans Administration,
No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD
publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis,
identifying unutilized, underutilized,
excess and surplus Federal buildings
and real property that HUD has
reviewed for suitability for use to assist
the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the
purpose of announcing that no
additional properties have been
determined suitable or unsuitable this
week.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: March 18, 2005.
Mark R. Johnston,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance
Programs.
[FR Doc. 05–5786 Filed 3–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–29–M
SUMMARY: This notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
DATES: March 25, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, Room 7262,
451 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708–1234;
TTY number for the hearing- and
speech-impaired (202) 708–2565, (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:11 Mar 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Information Collection Renewal
Submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for Approval Under
the Paperwork Reduction Act; OMB
Control Number 1018–0101; Monitoring
Recovered Species After Delisting As
Required Under Section 4(g) of the
Endangered Species Act—American
Peregrine Falcon
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The American peregrine
falcon was removed from the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife on
August 25, 1999. Section 4(g) of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) requires
that all species that are recovered and
removed from the List of Endangered
and Threatened Wildlife (delisted) be
monitored in cooperation with the
States for a period of not less than 5
years. The purpose of this requirement
is to detect any failure of a recovered
species to sustain itself without the
protections of the ESA. We (Fish and
Wildlife Service) have submitted the
collection of information described
below to OMB for renewal under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
DATES: You must submit comments on
or before April 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments on
this information collection requirement
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
15345
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 57 / Friday, March 25, 2005 / Notices
to the Desk Officer for the Department
of the Interior at OMB–OIRA via fax at
(202) 395–6566, or via e-mail at
OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov. Also,
please provide a copy of your comments
to Hope Grey, Information Collection
Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife
Service, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mail
Stop 222–ARLSQ, Arlington, Virginia
22203 (mail); (703) 358–2269 (fax); or
Hope_Grey@fws.gov (e-mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request a copy of the proposed
information collection requirement,
related forms, or explanatory material,
contact Hope Grey at the above
addresses or by telephone at (703) 358–
2482.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB
regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which
implement provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), require that interested members
of the public and affected agencies have
an opportunity to comment on
information collection and
recordkeeping activities (see 5 CFR
1320.8(d)). Currently we have approval
from OMB to collect information on the
American peregrine falcon under OMB
control number 1018–0101. This
approval expires on March 31, 2005. We
have submitted a request to OMB to
renew approval of the information
collection included in the ‘‘Monitoring
Plan for the American Peregrine Falcon:
A Species Recovered under the
Endangered Species Act’’ (Monitoring
Plan) (USFWS 2003). The monitoring
plan is available on our Web site at
https://endangered.fws.gov/recovery/
peregrine/plan2003.pdf. We are
requesting a 3-year term of approval for
this information collection. Federal
agencies may not conduct or sponsor
and a person is not required to respond
to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. OMB has up to 60 days to
approve or disapprove our information
collection request, but may respond
after 30 days. Therefore, to ensure that
your comments receive consideration,
send all comments and suggestions to
OMB by the date listed in the DATES
section.
We published a 60-day notice on this
information collection renewal in the
Federal Register on January 3, 2005 (70
FR 101) inviting public comment. In
addition to publishing a Federal
Register notice, we contacted seven
non-Federal biologists who have used
the forms previously and asked them to
review each of the three forms
associated with peregrine falcon
monitoring and to comment on the
clarity and relevance of the information
collection, the burden associated with
the collection, and whether there is
something we could do to minimize the
burden. We received a total of 10
comments, including three comments
on the Federal Register notice.
We received one comment from an
individual and comments from two
States on the Federal Register notice.
The individual did not express an
opinion on the information collection
itself, but took issue with the original
delisting of peregrine falcons in 1999.
One State supported the collection of
American peregrine falcon monitoring
data and stated that the information will
have tremendous practical utility for
both the State and the Service. That
State supports the submission of forms
via e-mail and also agreed with our
burden estimates for completing the
monitoring forms, but commented that
the data collection itself could take
more than 1 day. The other State
commented that we should request
OMB approval for the entire time frame
needed for peregrine monitoring (until
2015) rather than submit several
requests. This is not an option. By law,
OMB can grant approval of information
collections for a maximum of 3 years.
That State was also concerned that,
while the burden hours for completion
of the forms was accurate, the Service
does not account for the time necessary
to locate, access, and monitor falcon
eyries. The State recommended that we
reevaluate the estimate of burden to
incorporate these important aspects of
monitoring and data collection. In
response, we have included burden
estimates for the time required to visit
nest sites and record the data. The State
also recommended that we account for
the extra time it takes to collect
contaminants samples. We did not
include that estimate in the burden
hours, because collecting contaminants
samples is done opportunistically, in
conjunction with some other activity at
the nest site. It is rarely, if ever, the
primary reason for visiting a nest.
However, we have included the time it
takes to process the contaminants
samples.
The comments we received from our
outreach effort were generally favorable
and included some helpful suggestions
for improving the forms. The
commenters estimated the burden hours
for completing the monitoring forms to
be less than the hours we previously
estimated.
Post-delisting monitoring, required by
the ESA, tracks population trends of
recovered species. Data for American
peregrine falcons are collected by and
reported back to professional biologists
and volunteers according to the
monitoring plan. Contaminants
monitoring is included as part of the
post-delisting monitoring for peregrine
falcons because they are sensitive to
contaminants in the environment, and
contaminants could cause population
declines in the future. Contaminants
monitoring involves collection of
addled eggs found in nests and parts of
feathers from nestlings.
The Regional Migratory Birds and
Habitat Programs and the Endangered
Species offices use the information
provided in the three monitoring forms
(3–2307, 3–2308, and 3–2309) to track
measures of reproductive success and
levels of contaminants in American
peregrine falcons. The nest monitoring
data is reported on a 3-year interval,
after each monitoring year. The
contaminants monitoring is
opportunistic, with sample size goals to
be reached every 5 years. The results of
contaminants monitoring will be
reported after each 5-year interval. If we
do not collect this data, we could not
satisfy our responsibilities under the
delisting monitoring requirements of
section 4(g) of the Endangered Species
Act (ESA) (16 U.S.C. 1533g).
Title: Monitoring Recovered Species
After Delisting As Required Under
Section 4(g) of the Endangered Species
Act—American Peregrine Falcon.
Approval Number: 1018–0101.
Form Numbers: 3–2307, 3–2308, and
3–2309.
Frequency of Collection: 3–2307
(every 3 years); 3–2308 and 3–2309
(annually).
Description of Respondents:
Individuals, not-for-profit institutions,
Federal Government, States, tribes, and
local governments
Monitoring forms
Total annual
responses
3–2307—Nest Monitoring Form (filling out the form) ..................................................
3–2307—Nest Monitoring Form (collecting the data) .................................................
3–2308—Egg Contaminant Sheet ...............................................................................
Average burden
hours per
respondent
494
............................
12
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:11 Mar 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
0.25
10
1
25MRN1
Annual burden
hours
123.5
4,940
12
15346
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 57 / Friday, March 25, 2005 / Notices
Average burden
hours per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Monitoring forms
3–2309—Feather Contaminant Sheet .........................................................................
518
.5
6
12
Total ......................................................................................................................
Annual burden
hours
We again invite comments concerning
this information collection on: (1)
Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of monitoring of recovered
species as prescribed in section 4(g) of
the ESA, including whether or not the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of our estimate of
burden, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information for those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents. The information
collections in this program will be part
of a system of records covered by the
Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552(a)).
Dated: March 21, 2005.
Hope Grey
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 05–5955 Filed 3–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[AK–930–5420–EU–L027; FF–094263]
Notice of Applications for Recordable
Disclaimers of Interest for Lands
Underlying Salcha River in Alaska
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The State of Alaska has filed
an application for a recordable
disclaimer of interest in certain lands
underlying the Salcha River by the
United States.
DATES: Comments on the State of
Alaska’s applications should be
submitted on or before June 23, 2005.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the BLM Draft Navigability Reports
on or before May 24, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to
the Chief, Branch of Lands and Realty,
BLM Alaska State Office, 222 West 7th
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:11 Mar 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513–
7599.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Callie Webber at (907) 271–3167 or
Mike Brown at (907) 271–3602 or you
may visit the BLM recordable disclaimer
of interest Web site at https://
www.ak.blm.gov/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
12, 2004, the State of Alaska filed
applications for recordable disclaimers
of interest pursuant to Section 315 of
the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act and the regulations
contained in 43 CFR subpart 1864 for
lands underlying Salcha River (FF–
094263). A recordable disclaimer of
interest, if issued, will confirm the
United States has no valid interest in
the subject lands. The notice is intended
to notify the public of the pending
applications and the State’s grounds for
supporting it. The State asserts that this
river is navigable; therefore, under the
Equal Footing Doctrine and Submerged
Lands Act of 1953, ownership of these
lands underlying the rivers
automatically passed from the United
States to the State at the time of
statehood in 1959.
The State’s application (FF–094263) is
for the bed of the Salcha River and all
interconnecting sloughs between the
ordinary high water lines of the left and
right banks from origins within T. 3 N.,
R. 19 E., Fairbanks Meridian (FM),
Alaska, downstream approximately 125
miles SW to confluence with the Tanana
River at T. 5 S., R. 4 E., FM. The State
did not identify any known adverse
claimant or occupant of the affected
lands.
A final decision on the merits of the
applications will not be made before
June 23, 2005. During the 90-day period,
interested parties may comment upon
the State’s application, AA–085446, and
supporting evidence. Interested parties
may comment on the evidentiary
evidence presented in the BLM’s Draft
Navigability Reports on or before May
24, 2005.
Comments, including names and
street addresses of commenters, will be
available for public review at the Alaska
State Office (see address above), during
regular business hours 7:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. Individual respondents may
request confidentiality. If you wish to
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
..............................
5081.5
hold your name or address from
disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comments. Such requests will be
honored to the extent allowed by law.
All submissions from organizations or
businesses will be made available for
public inspection in their entirety.
Dated: March 18, 2005.
Carolyn Spoon,
Chief, Branch of Lands and Realty.
[FR Doc. 05–5911 Filed 3–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JA–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[NV–910–04–1990–EX]
Notice of Availability for the Emigrant
Mine Project Plan of Operations Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, 43 CFR part 3809, and the Federal
Land Policy and Management Act
(FLPMA), the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) Elko Field Office
has prepared, with the assistance of a
third-party contractor, a DEIS for the
Newmont Mining Corporation’s
proposed Plan of Operations for the
Emigrant Mine Project located in
northeastern Nevada.
DATES: Written comments on the DEIS
will be accepted for 60 days following
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the Notice of
Availability in the Federal Register. An
Open-House Public Meeting will be
held at the Bureau of Land Management
Elko Field Office at 3900 E. Idaho Street,
Elko, Nevada. The date and time of this
public meeting will be announced
through public notices, media news
releases and/or mailing. This meeting
will be scheduled no sooner than 15
days following the publication of this
notice.
Written comments may be
sent to the Elko Field Office by any of
the following methods: Mail: Send to
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\25MRN1.SGM
25MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 57 (Friday, March 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15344-15346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5955]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Information Collection Renewal Submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for Approval Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act; OMB Control Number 1018-0101; Monitoring Recovered Species After
Delisting As Required Under Section 4(g) of the Endangered Species
Act--American Peregrine Falcon
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The American peregrine falcon was removed from the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife on August 25, 1999. Section 4(g) of
the Endangered Species Act (ESA) requires that all species that are
recovered and removed from the List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife (delisted) be monitored in cooperation with the States for a
period of not less than 5 years. The purpose of this requirement is to
detect any failure of a recovered species to sustain itself without the
protections of the ESA. We (Fish and Wildlife Service) have submitted
the collection of information described below to OMB for renewal under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: You must submit comments on or before April 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments on this information collection
requirement
[[Page 15345]]
to the Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior at OMB-OIRA via
fax at (202) 395-6566, or via e-mail at OIRA--DOCKET@omb.eop.gov. Also,
please provide a copy of your comments to Hope Grey, Information
Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 North
Fairfax Drive, Mail Stop 222-ARLSQ, Arlington, Virginia 22203 (mail);
(703) 358-2269 (fax); or Hope--Grey@fws.gov (e-mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request a copy of the proposed
information collection requirement, related forms, or explanatory
material, contact Hope Grey at the above addresses or by telephone at
(703) 358-2482.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which
implement provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), require that interested members of the public and
affected agencies have an opportunity to comment on information
collection and recordkeeping activities (see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)).
Currently we have approval from OMB to collect information on the
American peregrine falcon under OMB control number 1018-0101. This
approval expires on March 31, 2005. We have submitted a request to OMB
to renew approval of the information collection included in the
``Monitoring Plan for the American Peregrine Falcon: A Species
Recovered under the Endangered Species Act'' (Monitoring Plan) (USFWS
2003). The monitoring plan is available on our Web site at https://
endangered.fws.gov/recovery/peregrine/plan2003.pdf. We are requesting a
3-year term of approval for this information collection. Federal
agencies may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. OMB has up to 60 days to approve or
disapprove our information collection request, but may respond after 30
days. Therefore, to ensure that your comments receive consideration,
send all comments and suggestions to OMB by the date listed in the
DATES section.
We published a 60-day notice on this information collection renewal
in the Federal Register on January 3, 2005 (70 FR 101) inviting public
comment. In addition to publishing a Federal Register notice, we
contacted seven non-Federal biologists who have used the forms
previously and asked them to review each of the three forms associated
with peregrine falcon monitoring and to comment on the clarity and
relevance of the information collection, the burden associated with the
collection, and whether there is something we could do to minimize the
burden. We received a total of 10 comments, including three comments on
the Federal Register notice.
We received one comment from an individual and comments from two
States on the Federal Register notice. The individual did not express
an opinion on the information collection itself, but took issue with
the original delisting of peregrine falcons in 1999. One State
supported the collection of American peregrine falcon monitoring data
and stated that the information will have tremendous practical utility
for both the State and the Service. That State supports the submission
of forms via e-mail and also agreed with our burden estimates for
completing the monitoring forms, but commented that the data collection
itself could take more than 1 day. The other State commented that we
should request OMB approval for the entire time frame needed for
peregrine monitoring (until 2015) rather than submit several requests.
This is not an option. By law, OMB can grant approval of information
collections for a maximum of 3 years. That State was also concerned
that, while the burden hours for completion of the forms was accurate,
the Service does not account for the time necessary to locate, access,
and monitor falcon eyries. The State recommended that we reevaluate the
estimate of burden to incorporate these important aspects of monitoring
and data collection. In response, we have included burden estimates for
the time required to visit nest sites and record the data. The State
also recommended that we account for the extra time it takes to collect
contaminants samples. We did not include that estimate in the burden
hours, because collecting contaminants samples is done
opportunistically, in conjunction with some other activity at the nest
site. It is rarely, if ever, the primary reason for visiting a nest.
However, we have included the time it takes to process the contaminants
samples.
The comments we received from our outreach effort were generally
favorable and included some helpful suggestions for improving the
forms. The commenters estimated the burden hours for completing the
monitoring forms to be less than the hours we previously estimated.
Post-delisting monitoring, required by the ESA, tracks population
trends of recovered species. Data for American peregrine falcons are
collected by and reported back to professional biologists and
volunteers according to the monitoring plan. Contaminants monitoring is
included as part of the post-delisting monitoring for peregrine falcons
because they are sensitive to contaminants in the environment, and
contaminants could cause population declines in the future.
Contaminants monitoring involves collection of addled eggs found in
nests and parts of feathers from nestlings.
The Regional Migratory Birds and Habitat Programs and the
Endangered Species offices use the information provided in the three
monitoring forms (3-2307, 3-2308, and 3-2309) to track measures of
reproductive success and levels of contaminants in American peregrine
falcons. The nest monitoring data is reported on a 3-year interval,
after each monitoring year. The contaminants monitoring is
opportunistic, with sample size goals to be reached every 5 years. The
results of contaminants monitoring will be reported after each 5-year
interval. If we do not collect this data, we could not satisfy our
responsibilities under the delisting monitoring requirements of section
4(g) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (16 U.S.C. 1533g).
Title: Monitoring Recovered Species After Delisting As Required
Under Section 4(g) of the Endangered Species Act--American Peregrine
Falcon.
Approval Number: 1018-0101.
Form Numbers: 3-2307, 3-2308, and 3-2309.
Frequency of Collection: 3-2307 (every 3 years); 3-2308 and 3-2309
(annually).
Description of Respondents: Individuals, not-for-profit
institutions, Federal Government, States, tribes, and local governments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average burden
Monitoring forms Total annual hours per Annual burden
responses respondent hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3-2307--Nest Monitoring Form (filling out the form)..... 494 0.25 123.5
3-2307--Nest Monitoring Form (collecting the data)...... ................ 10 4,940
3-2308--Egg Contaminant Sheet........................... 12 1 12
[[Page 15346]]
3-2309--Feather Contaminant Sheet....................... 12 .5 6
-------------------
Total............................................... 518 ................. 5081.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We again invite comments concerning this information collection on:
(1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of monitoring of recovered species as prescribed in
section 4(g) of the ESA, including whether or not the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of our estimate of burden,
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
for those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents.
The information collections in this program will be part of a system of
records covered by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552(a)).
Dated: March 21, 2005.
Hope Grey
Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 05-5955 Filed 3-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P