Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received, 14746 [05-5759]

Download as PDF 14746 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration [Summary Notice No. PE–2005–16] Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of petition exemption received. AGENCY: This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. Issued in Washington, DC, on March 17, 2005. Anthony F. Fazio, Director, Office of Rulemaking. Petitions For Exemption Docket No.: FAA–2005–20582. Petitioner: John S. Ditmars. Section of 14 CFR Affected: § 45.21(b), (c)(2) and (c)(3). Description of Relief Sought: To allow SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking the petitioner to use registration marks provisions governing the application, on a PA–60 aircraft that do not meet the processing, and disposition of petitions color contrast requirements of part 45. for exemption, part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this [FR Doc. 05–5759 Filed 3–22–05; 8:45 am] notice contains a summary of a certain BILLING CODE 4910–13–P petition seeking relief from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public’s DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. Federal Aviation Administration Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information Collaborative Decisionmaking in the summary is intended to affect the Simulation legal status of any petition or its final AGENCY: Federal Aviation disposition. Administration (FAA), DOT. DATES: Comments on petitions received ACTION: Summary of the simulation of a must identify the petition docket capacity-reducing event using Chicago number involved and must be received O’Hare International Airport as a model. on or before April 12, 2005. SUMMARY: This summarizes the ADDRESSES: Send comments on the simulation of a capacity-reducing event petition to the Docket Management run by the FAA on July 13–14, 2004. System, U.S. Department of This simulation was conducted by the Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 agency in accordance with Section 423 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC of Public Law 108–176, codified at 20590–0001. You must identify the docket number FAA–2005–20582 at the section 40129 of title 49 of the United States Code. beginning of your comments. If you wish to receive confirmation that the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FAA received your comments, include a James W. Whitlow, Deputy Chief self-addressed, stamped postcard. Counsel, Policy and Adjudication, You may also submit comments Federal Aviation Administration, 800 through the Internet to https:// Independence Avenue, SW., dms.dot.gov. You may review the public Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) docket containing the petition, any 267–3773. comments received, and any final SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: disposition in person in the Dockets Background Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal In accordance with Section 423 of holidays. The Dockets Office (telephone Public Law 108–176, the FAA sought to 1–800–647–5527) is on the plaza level establish a collaborative decision of the NASSIF Building at the making pilot program that would Department of Transportation at the facilitate certain communications above address. Also, you may review among participating carriers at a public dockets on the Internet at designated airport over their flight https://dms.dot.gov. schedules if the airport experience or is FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John expected to experience reduced capacity because of a capacity-reducing event. Linsenmeyer (202–267–5174), Office of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation On March 23, 2004 (69 FR 13616), the FAA published a notice in the Federal Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or Register requesting comments on the FAA’s proposed actions to implement a Susan Lender, 202–267–8029, Office of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation program. In that notice, the FAA announced it was preparing a computer Administration, 800 Independence simulation of a capacity-reducing event Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:27 Mar 22, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 using Chicago O’Hare International Airport as a model. The stated purpose of the simulation was to evaluate the effectiveness of different delayavoidance strategies that may be employed by the FAA and its customers in handling a capacity-reducing event. The FAA scheduled the simulation for July 13–14, 2003, and issued a letter of invitation to the major airlines operating at O’Hare Airport, and to all major industry groups. The simulation was built around an actual capacityreducing event that occurred at O’Hare Airport on March 17, 2004, when a ground delay program was implemented at the airport for 11 hours because of a snowstorm. The simulation was designed to allow carriers to review their data for that date, and compare it to the results achieved during the simulation. This document summarizes the simulation that was conducted on July 13–14, 2004. Summary Participants in the simulation included seven airlines, two trade groups, and FAA and DOT personnel. The seven airlines represented 96% of the flights into O’Hare Airport. The participants first reviewed the March 17th operation at O’Hare Airport before proceeding to the simulation. In the first simulation scenario, the airlines had entered their date 12 hours in advance, without sharing their information with any other carriers. Based on the data entered in the software, the carriers were able to accommodate 93% of their passengers on their own airline. A factor impacting this result was the airlines’ lack of access during the simulation to the passenger and planning resources available at their Operation Centers. This skewed the number of nonaccommodated passengers, because the Operation Centers have resources available to accommodate their passengers, including busing and the use of larger aircraft. The next simulation reduced the airport arrival rate below the actual rate incurred on March 17, 2004 in order to explore the concept of inter-airline communication. Again the airlines affirmed their ability to accommodate passengers through mechanisms available today, using their existing online and interline flight interruption procedures. Conclusions The simulation did identify modifications to the ground delay program software that would enhance operations, such as earlier notification E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM 23MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 14746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5759]



[[Page 14746]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2005-16]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption, 
part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice 
contains a summary of a certain petition seeking relief from specified 
requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to improve the 
public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA's 
regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the 
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to 
affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before April 12, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the petition to the Docket Management 
System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify the docket 
number FAA-2005-20582 at the beginning of your comments. If you wish to 
receive confirmation that the FAA received your comments, include a 
self-addressed, stamped postcard.
    You may also submit comments through the Internet to https://
dms.dot.gov. You may review the public docket containing the petition, 
any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the 
Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays. The Dockets Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on 
the plaza level of the NASSIF Building at the Department of 
Transportation at the above address. Also, you may review public 
dockets on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Linsenmeyer (202-267-5174), 
Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or Susan Lender, 202-
267-8029, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.


    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 17, 2005.
Anthony F. Fazio,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petitions For Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2005-20582.
    Petitioner: John S. Ditmars.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: Sec.  45.21(b), (c)(2) and (c)(3).
    Description of Relief Sought: To allow the petitioner to use 
registration marks on a PA-60 aircraft that do not meet the color 
contrast requirements of part 45.

[FR Doc. 05-5759 Filed 3-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.