Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Harbor Activities Related to the Delta IV/Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle at Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA, 14651-14656 [05-5753]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Notices
commercial vessels, operators, and
dealers.
A separate notice of scoping meetings
for this amendment were published on
March 3, 2005 (70 FR 10360), and
March 18, 2005 (70 FR 13171).
Issues Identified for Discussion Under
this Amendment
The Possible Implementation of an
Individual Fishing Quota System
An individual fishing quota program
(IFQ) is a form of output control that
allocates harvesting privileges to
individual fishermen. The MSFCMA
defines an IFQ as ‘‘a Federal permit
under a limited access system to harvest
a quantity of fish, expressed by a unit
or units representing a percentage of the
total allowable catch of a fishery that
may be received or held for exclusive
use by a person.’’ One type of IFQ
program is an individual transferable
quota (ITQ) program. Under an ITQ
program quota shares are able to be
transferred between eligible allocation
holders.
Under the current FMP, there are
three fishing categories that the quota is
divided among. There is an incidental,
a part-time, and a full-time category for
division of the quota. Under the Tilefish
FMP, the ‘‘target’’ estimate of landings
for the incidental category (5 percent of
the TAL) is first deducted from the
overall TAL, and then the remainder of
the TAL is divided among the full-time
tier 1 category, which receives 66
percent; the full-time tier 2 category,
which receives 15 percent; and, the
part-time category, which receives 19
percent. Trip limits are currently only
imposed in the incidental permit
category (open access) to achieve a
‘‘target’’ or soft quota.
The quota-based limited access
program currently in place is based on
group quota shares (quotas allocated to
incidental, part-time, and full time
vessels). However, an IFQ system could
be considered for the three directed
categories of tilefish fishing vessels. The
Tilefish FMP states that ‘‘It is important
to note that the current Mid-Atlantic
Council’s policy is that landings after
1998 will not assure future access to or
an allocation of the tilefish resource.
The purpose of this policy is to prevent
a rush to fish on this overfished
resource, in the hopes of obtaining a
larger future allocation.’’ Therefore, any
IFQ alternative will likely be based on
historical catches from logbook data
from the time period between 1984
and1998. One logical allocation of an
IFQ system could be based on
individual vessel catches over time,
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:27 Mar 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
however, other alternatives to this
system may be proposed.
An IFQ system could be developed to
include all directed categories (i.e., fulltime tier 1, full-time tier 2, and parttime) or it could be designed to include
only 1 or two of the directed categories.
However, it is possible that an IFQ
system that includes all three directed
categories would result in less of an
administrative burden as there would be
only one quota management program as
opposed to 3 or 4 programs. Several
alternatives can be used to divide the
IFQ allocation among vessels within
each directed category. For example, the
following could be used to derive the
IFQ allocation: (1) The IFQ allocation
for a specific directed category could be
divided among that category’s
participants equally; (2) the IFQ
allocation could be based on historic
landings (such as the best 3 or 5 years
of landings over a 10-year period) and
then divided among participants; (3) in
deriving an IFQ allocation the historic
landings employed to derive the original
FMP allocation could be used; or, (4) in
deriving an IFQ allocation weighted
landings that would allocate a greater
weight to more current landings could
be used.
Consideration of Possible New Methods
to Collect Landings Information For the
Commercial Fishery
Collection of information issues have
arisen since the implementation of the
original FMP. More specifically,
stakeholders have recommended that
the Council assess measures to improve
the collection of landings information.
The current FMP requires that ‘‘The
owner or operator of any vessel issued
a limited access permit for tilefish must
submit a tilefish catch report via the
Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system
within 24 hours after returning to port
and offloading as required by the
Regional Administrator.’’ According to
industry members not all landings are
reported within the 24 hour period as
required under current regulations.
Therefore, real-time data may not be
available to manage the fishery. This
practice could potentially allow a
category to remain open when, in fact,
it should be closed. Lastly, tilefish
fishermen use paper logbooks to report
fishing activity. Stakeholders and
scientists have suggested that the paper
logbooks are very generic and do not
allow for the collection of detailed
information that could better assess
effort in the fishery. More detailed/
relevant data could be collected that
could be used to further refine the stock
assessment for tilefish.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14651
Possible Recreational Management
Measures
The regulations allow for tilefish to be
harvested by the recreational sector.
When the FMP was first developed, the
recreational participation in this fishery
was very small. However, some Council
members have indicated that they have
seen an increase in recreational tilefish
landings. There may be a need to assess
how the recent increase in recreational
landings can be accounted for in the
FMP.
Other Management Concerns
A number of additional management
concerns may also be considered in the
development of Amendment 1
including: (1) Possible establishment of
a required minimum hook size and/or
hook configuration in the tilefish
fishery; and, (2) methods to allow new
entrants into the commercial fishery as
the stock recovers.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: March 18, 2005.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E5–1281 Filed 3–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 020205E]
Small Takes of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Specified Activities;
Harbor Activities Related to the Delta
IV/Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle
at Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of application
and proposed authorization for
incidental harassment of marine
mammals; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request
from The Boeing Company (Boeing) for
a reauthorization to take small numbers
of marine mammals by harassment
incidental to harbor activities related to
the Delta IV/Evolved Expendable
Launch Vehicle (EELV) at south
Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA (VAFB).
Under the Marine Mammal Protection
Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting
comments on its proposal to authorize
Boeing to take, by harassment, small
numbers of several species of pinnipeds
at south VAFB beginning in May 2005.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
14652
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Notices
Comments and information must
be received no later than April 22, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the
application should be addressed to
Steve Leathery, Chief, Permits,
Conservation, and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225. The mailbox address for
providing e-mail comments on this
action is PR1.020205E@noaa.gov.
Comments sent via e-mail, including
attachments, must not exceed a 10–
megabyte file size. Comments may also
be submitted via facsimile at (301) 427–
2521. A copy of the application
containing a list of references used in
this document may be obtained by
writing to this address, by telephoning
the contact listed here (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) or online at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/protlres/
PR1/SmalllTake/
smalltakelinfo.htm#applications.
DATES:
Jolie
Harrison, (301) 713–2289, ext. 166 or
Monica DeAngelis, (562) 980–3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Permission for incidental takings may
be granted if NMFS finds that the taking
will have no more than a negligible
impact on the species or stock(s), will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses, and that
the permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking
are set forth.
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably expected
to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.
Subsection 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:27 Mar 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
marine mammals by harassment. Except
for certain categories of activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[‘‘Level A harassment’’]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[‘‘Level B harassment’’].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
day time limit for NMFS review of an
application followed by a 30–day public
notice and comment period on any
proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of small numbers
of marine mammals. Within 45 days of
the close of the comment period, NMFS
must either issue or deny issuance of
the authorization.
Summary of Request
On December 21, 2004, NMFS
received an application from Boeing
requesting an authorization for the
harassment of small numbers of Pacific
harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardsi)
and California sea lions (Zalophus
californianus) incidental to harbor
activities related to the Delta IV/EELV,
including: transport vessel operations,
cargo movement activities, harbor
maintenance dredging, and kelp habitat
mitigation operations. In addition,
northern elephant seals (Mirounga
angustirostris) may also be incidentally
harassed but in even smaller numbers.
Incidental Harassment Authorizations
(IHAs) were issued to Boeing on May
15, 2002 (67 FR 36151, May 23, 2002),
May 20, 2003 (68 FR 36540, June 18,
2003), and on May 20, 2004 (69 FR
29696, May 25, 2004) each for a 1–year
period. The harbor where activities will
take place is on south VAFB
approximately 2.5 mi (4.02 km) south of
Point Arguello, CA and approximately 1
mi (1.61 km) north of the nearest marine
mammal pupping site (i.e., Rocky
Point).
Specified Activities
Delta Mariner off-loading operations
and associated cargo movements will
occur a maximum of 3 times per year.
The Delta Mariner is a 312–ft (95.1–m)
long, 84–ft (25.6–m) wide steel hull
ocean-going vessel capable of operating
at a 8–ft (2.4–m) draft. For the first few
visits to the south VAFB harbor, tug
boats will accompany the Delta Mariner.
Sources of noise from the Delta Mariner
include ventilating propellers used for
maneuvering into position and the cargo
bay door when it becomes disengaged.
Removal of the common booster core
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(CBC) from the Delta Mariner requires
use of an elevating platform transporter
(EPT), an additional source of noise
with sound levels measured at
approximately 85 dB A-weighted (re 20
microPascals at 1–m) 20 ft (6.1 m) from
the engine exhaust when the engine is
running mid-speed (Acentech, 1998).
Procedures require two short
(approximately 1/3 second) beeps of the
horn prior to starting the ignition. The
sound level of the EPT horn ranged from
62–70 dB A-weighted at 200 ft (60.9 m)
away, and 84–112 dB A-weighted at 25
ft (7.6 m) away. Containers containing
flight hardware items will be towed off
the Delta Mariner by a tractor tug that
generates a sound level of
approximately 87 dB A-weighted at 50
ft (15.2 m) while in operational mode.
Total time of Delta Mariner docking and
cargo movement activities is estimated
at approximately between 14 and 18
hours in good weather.
To accommodate the Delta Mariner,
the harbor will need to be dredged,
removing approximately 3,000 to 5,000
cubic yards of sediment per dredging.
Dredging will involve the use of heavy
equipment, including a clamshell
dredge, dredging crane, a small tug,
dredging barge, dump trucks, and a skip
loader. Measured sound levels from this
equipment are roughly equivalent to
those estimated for the wharf
modification equipment: 43 to 81 dB Aweighted at 250 ft (76.2 m). Dredge
operations, from set-up to tear-down,
would continue 24–hours a day for 3 to
5 weeks. Sedimentation surveys have
shown that initial dredging indicates
that maintenance dredging should be
required annually or twice per year,
depending on the hardware delivery
schedule.
A more detailed description of the
work proposed for 2005 is contained in
the application which is available upon
request (see ADDRESSES) and in the Final
US Air Force Environmental
Assessment for Harbor Activities
Associated with the Delta IV Program at
Vandenberg Air Force Base (ENSR
International, 2001).
Habitat and Marine Mammals Affected
by the Activity
Pacific Harbor Seals
The marine mammal species likely to
be harassed incidental to harbor
activities at south VAFB are the Pacific
harbor seal and the California sea lion.
The most recent estimate of the Pacific
harbor seal population in California is
27,863 seals. Since 1990 there has been
no net population growth along the
mainland or the Channel Islands. The
decrease in population growth rate has
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Notices
occurred at the same time as a decrease
in human-caused mortality and may
indicate that the population has reached
its environmental carrying capacity
(Carretta et al., 2004). The total
population of harbor seals on VAFB is
now estimated to be 1,099 (maximum of
515 seals hauled out at one time on
south VAFB) based on sighting surveys
and telemetry data (SRS Technologies,
2003).
The daily haul-out behavior of harbor
seals along the south VAFB coastline is
primarily dependent on time of day.
The highest number of seals haul-out at
south VAFB between 1100 through 1600
hours. In addition, haul-out behavior at
all sites seems to be influenced by
environmental factors such as high
swell, tide height, and wind. The
combination of all three may prevent
seals from hauling out at most sites. The
number of seals hauled out at any site
can vary greatly from day to day based
on environmental conditions. Harbor
seals occasionally haul out at a beach
250 ft (76.2 m) west of the south VAFB
harbor and on rocks outside the harbor
breakwater where Boeing will be
conducting Delta Mariner operations,
cargo loading, dredging activities, and
reef enhancement activities. The
maximum number of seals present
during the 2001 dredging of the harbor
was 23 (averaging 7 per observation
period) and the maximum number
hauled out during the 2002 wharf
modification activities was 43,
averaging 21 per day when tidal
conditions were favorable for hauling
out. Dredging and reef enhancement did
not occur in 2004. The harbor seal
pupping site closest to south VAFB
harbor is at Rocky Point, approximately
1 mi (1.6 km) north of the harbor.
Several factors affect the seasonal
haul-out behavior of harbor seals
including environmental conditions,
reproduction, and molting. Harbor seal
numbers at VAFB begin to increase in
March during the pupping season
(March to June) as females spend more
time on shore nursing pups. The
number of hauled-out seals is at its
highest during the molt which occurs
from May through July. During the
molting season, tagged harbor seals at
VAFB increased their time spent on
shore by 22.4 percent; however, all seals
continued to make daily trips to sea to
forage. Molting harbor seals entering the
water because of a disturbance are not
adversely affected in their ability to
molt and do not endure
thermoregulatory stress. During pupping
and molting season, harbor seals at the
south VAFB sites expand into haul-out
areas that are not used the rest of the
year. The number of seals hauled out
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:27 Mar 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
begins to decrease in August after the
molt is complete and reaches the lowest
number in late fall and early winter.
California Sea Lions
During the wharf modification
activity in June-July 2002, California sea
lions were observed hauling out on the
breakwater in small numbers (up to 6
individuals). Although this is
considered to be an unusual occurrence
and is possibly related to fish schooling
in the area, Boeing included sea lions in
their request.
California sea lions range from British
Columbia to Mexico. The most recent
population estimates for the California
sea lions range from 237,000 to 244,000
individuals (Caretta et al., 2004).
Between 1975 and 2001, the population
growth rate was 5.4–6.1 percent. A
1985–1987 population survey indicated
that most individuals on the Northern
Channel Islands were on San Miguel
Island, with the population ranging
from 2,235 to over 17,000. The largest
numbers of California sea lions in the
VAFB vicinity occur at Lion Rock, 0.4
mi (0.64 km) southeast of Point Sal. This
area is approximately 1.5 mi (2.41 km)
north of the VAFB boundary. At least
100 sea lions can be observed during
any season at this site. The Point
Arguello beaches and the rocky ledges
of South Rocky Point on south VAFB
are haulout areas that may be used by
California sea lions. In 2003, at least 145
sea lions were observed at Rocky Point,
including five pups that did not survive
due to abandonment shortly after birth.
This was thought to be an El Nino effect,
as there had never been any previously
reported sea lion births at VAFB
(Thorson, 2003).
Each year, small groups of sea lions
have been observed heading south along
the VAFB coastline in April and May
(Tetra Tech, 1997). Starting in August,
large groups of sea lions can be seen
moving north, in groups varying in size
from 25 to more than 300 (Roest, 1995).
This concurs with established migration
patterns (Reeves et al., 1992; Roest,
1995). Juvenile sea lions can be
observed hauled-out with harbor seals
along the South Base sites from July
through September (Tetra Tech, 1997).
Starving and exhausted subadult sea
lions are fairly common on central
California beaches during the months of
July and August (Roest, 1995).
During the breeding season, most of
California sea lions inhabit southern
California and Mexico. Rookery sites in
southern California are limited to San
Miguel Island and to the southerly
Channel Islands of San Nicolas, Santa
Barbara, and San Clemente. Breeding
season begins in mid-May, occurring
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14653
within 10 days of arrival at the
rookeries. Molting occurs gradually over
several months in the late summer and
fall. Because the molt is not
catastrophic, the sea lions can enter the
water to feed.
Male California sea lions migrate
annually. In the spring they migrate
southward to breeding rookeries in the
Channel Islands and Mexico, then
migrate northward in the late summer
following breeding season. Females
appear to remain near the breeding
rookeries. The greatest population on
land occurs in September and October
during the post-breeding dispersal and
although many of the sea lions,
particularly juveniles and sub-adult and
adult males, may move north away from
the Channel Islands.
Other Marine Mammals
Other marine mammal species are
rare to infrequent along the south VAFB
coast during certain times of the year
and are unlikely to be harassed by
Boeing’s activities. These four species
are: the northern elephant seal, the
northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus),
Guadalupe fur seal (Arctocephalus
townsendi), and Steller sea lions
(Eumetopias jubatus). Northern
elephant seals may occur on VAFB but
do not haul out in the harbor area.
Northern fur seals, Guadalupe fur seals
and Steller sea lions occur along the
California coast and Northern Channel
Islands but are not likely to be found on
VAFB. Descriptions of the biology and
local distribution of these species can be
found in the application as well as other
sources such as Stewart and Yochem
(1994, 1984), Forney et al. (2000), Koski
et al. (1998), Barlow et al. (1993),
Stewart and DeLong (1995), and Lowry
et al. (1992). NMFS Stock Assessments
can be viewed at: https://
www.NMFS.noaa.gov/pr/PR2/
StocklAssessmentlProgram/
sars.html. Please refer to those
documents for information on these
species.
Potential Effects of Activities on Marine
Mammals
Acoustic and visual stimuli generated
by the use of heavy equipment during
the Delta Mariner off-loading
operations, dredging, and kelp habitat
mitigation, as well as the increased
presence of personnel, may cause shortterm disturbance to harbor seals and
California sea lions hauled out along the
beach and rocks in the vicinity of the
south VAFB harbor. This disturbance
from acoustic and visual stimuli is the
principal means of marine mammal
taking associated with these activities.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
14654
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Notices
Based on the measured sounds of
construction equipment, such as might
be used during Boeing’s activities,
sound level intensity decreases
proportional to the square root of the
distance from the source. A dredging
crane at the end of the dock producing
88 dBA of noise would be
approximately 72 dBA at the nearest
beach or the end of the breakwater,
roughly 250 ft (76.2 m) away. The EPT
produces approximately 85 dBA,
measured less than 20 ft (6 m) from the
engine exhaust, when the engine is
running at mid speed. The EPT
operation procedure requires two short
beeps of the horn (approximately 1/3 of
a second each) prior to starting the
ignition. Sound level measurements for
the horn ranged from 84 to 112 dBA at
25 ft (7.6 m) away and 62 to 70 dBA at
200 ft (61 m) away. The highest
measurement was taken from the side of
the vehicle where the horn is mounted.
Ambient background noise measured
approximately 250 ft (76.2 m) from the
beach was estimated to be 35–48 dB Aweighted (Acentech, 1998; EPA, 1971).
Pinnipeds sometimes show startle
reactions when exposed to sudden brief
sounds. An acoustic stimulus with
sudden onset (such as a sonic boom)
may be analogous to a ‘‘looming’’ visual
stimulus (Hayes and Saif, 1967), which
may elicit flight away from the source
(Berrens et al., 1988). The onset of
operations by a loud sound source, such
as the EPT during CBC off-loading
procedures, may elicit such a reaction.
In addition, the movements of cranes
and dredges may represent a ‘‘looming’’
visual stimulus to seals hauled out in
close proximity. Seals and sea lions
exposed to such acoustic and visual
stimuli may either exhibit a startle
response and/or leave the haul-out site.
According to the MMPA, if harbor
activities disrupt the behavioral patterns
of harbor seals, these activities would
take marine mammals by Level B
harassment. In general, if the received
level of the noise stimulus exceeds both
the background (ambient) noise level
and the auditory threshold of the
animals, and especially if the stimulus
is novel to them, there may be a
behavioral response. The probability
and degree of response will also depend
on the season, the group composition of
the pinnipeds, and the type of activity
in which they are engaged. Minor and
brief responses, such as short-duration
startle or alert reactions, are not likely
to constitute disruption of behavioral
patterns, such as migration, nursing,
breeding, feeding, or sheltering (i.e.,
Level B harassment) and would not
cause serious injury or mortality to
marine mammals.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:27 Mar 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
On the other hand, startle and alert
reactions accompanied by large-scale
movements, such as stampedes into the
water, may rise to the level of Level B
harassment and could result in injury of
individuals. In addition, such largescale movements by dense aggregations
of marine mammals or on pupping sites
could potentially lead to takes by
serious injury or death. However, there
is no potential for large-scale
movements leading to serious injury or
mortality near the south VAFB harbor,
because on average the number of
harbor seals hauled out near the site on
average is less than 30 and there is no
pupping at nearby sites. The effects of
the harbor activities are expected to be
limited to short-term startle responses
and localized behavioral changes.
According to the June 2002 dock
modification construction report
(ENSRI, 2002), the maximum number of
harbor seals hauled out each day ranged
from 23 to 25 animals. There were 15
occasions in which construction noise,
vehicle noise, or noise from a fishing
boat caused the seals to lift their heads.
Flushing only occurred due to fishing
activities which were unrelated to the
construction activities. The sea lions
were less reactive to the construction
noise than the harbor seals. None of the
construction activities caused any of the
sea lions to leave the jetty rocks and
there was only one incident of a head
alert reaction.
The report from the December 2002
dredging activities show that the
number of Pacific harbor seals ranged
from 0 to 19 and that California sea
lions did not haul out during the
monitoring period. On 10 occasions,
harbor seals showed head alerts
although two of the alerts were for
disturbances that were not related to the
project. No harbor seals flushed during
the activities on the dock.
For a further discussion of the
anticipated effects of the planned
activities on harbor seals in the area,
please refer to the application and ENSR
International’s 2001 Final
Environmental Assessment. Information
contained in the application and
referenced sources as updated by recent
monitoring reports is adopted by NMFS
as the best information available on this
subject.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected
to be Harassed
Boeing estimates that a maximum of
43 harbor seals per day may be hauled
out near the south VAFB harbor, with a
daily average of 21 seals sighted when
tidal conditions were favorable during
previous dredging operations in the
harbor. Considering the maximum and
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
average number of seals hauled out per
day, assuming that the seals may be
seen twice a day, and using a maximum
total of 73 operating days in 2005–2006,
NMFS estimates that a maximum of 767
to 1570 Pacific harbor seals may be
subject to Level B harassment.
During wharf modification activities,
a maximum of six California sea lions
were seen hauling out in a single day.
Based on the above-mentioned
calculation, NMFS believes that a
maximum of 219 California sea lions
and 10 northern elephant seals (because
they may be in nearby waters) may be
subject to Level B harassment.
Possible Effects of Activities on Marine
Mammal Habitat
Boeing anticipates no loss or
modification to the habitat used by
Pacific harbor seals or California sea
lions that haul out near the south VAFB
harbor. The harbor seal and sea lion
haul-out sites near south VAFB harbor
are not used as breeding, molting, or
mating sites; therefore, it is not expected
that the activities in the harbor will
have any impact on the ability of Pacific
harbor seals or California sea lions in
the area to reproduce.
Boeing anticipates unavoidable kelp
removal during dredging. This habitat
modification will not affect the marine
mammal habitat. However, Boeing will
mitigate for the removal of kelp habitat
by placing 150 tons of rocky substrate in
a sandy area between the breakwater
and the mooring dolphins to enhance an
existing artificial reef. This type of
mitigation was implemented by the
Army Corps of Engineers following the
1984 and 1989 dredging. A lush kelp
bed adjacent to the sandy area has
developed from the efforts. The
substrate will consist of approximately
150 sharp-faced boulders, each with a
diameter of about 2 ft (0.61 m) and each
weighing about one ton. The boulders
will be brought in by truck from an offsite quarry and loaded by crane onto a
small barge at the wharf. The barge is
towed by a tugboat to a location along
the mooring dolphins from which a
small barge-mounted crane can place
them into the sandy area. Boeing plans
to perform the reef enhancement in
conjunction with the next maintenance
dredging event in order to minimize
cost and disturbances to animals. Noise
will be generated by the trucks
delivering the boulders to the harbor
and during the operation of unloading
the boulders onto the barges and into
the water.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Notices
Possible Effects of Activities on
Subsistence Needs
There are no subsistence uses for
Pacific harbor seals in California waters,
and thus, there are no anticipated effects
on subsistence needs.
Mitigation
To reduce the potential for
disturbance from visual and acoustic
stimuli associated with the activities
Boeing will undertake the following
marine mammal mitigating measures:
(1) If activities occur during nighttime
hours, lighting will be turned on before
dusk and left on the entire night to
avoid startling harbor seals at night.
(2) Activities will be initiated before
dusk.
(3) Construction noises must be kept
constant (i.e., not interrupted by periods
of quiet in excess of 30 minutes) while
harbor seals are present.
(4) If activities cease for longer than
30 minutes and harbor seals are in the
area, start-up of activities will include a
gradual increase in noise levels.
(5) A NMFS-approved marine
mammal observer will visually monitor
the harbor seals on the beach adjacent
to the harbor and on rocks for any
flushing or other behaviors as a result of
Boeing’s activities (see Monitoring).
(6) The Delta Mariner and
accompanying vessels will enter the
harbor only when the tide is too high for
harbor seals to haul-out on the rocks
and the vessel will reduce speed 1.5 to
2 knots (1.5–2.0 nm/hr; 2.8–3.7 km/hr)
once the vessel is within 3 mi (4.83 km)
of the harbor. The vessel will enter the
harbor stern first, approaching the wharf
and mooring dolphins at less than 0.75
knot (1.4 km/hr).
(7) As alternate dredge methods are
explored, the dredge contractor may
introduce quieter techniques and
equipment.
Monitoring
As part of its 2002 application, Boeing
provided a proposed monitoring plan
for assessing impacts to harbor seals
from the activities at south VAFB harbor
and for determining when mitigation
measures should be employed. NMFS
proposes the same plan for this IHA.
A NMFS-approved and VAFBdesignated biologically trained observer
will monitor the area for pinnipeds
during all harbor activities. During
nighttime activities, the harbor area will
be illuminated, and the monitor will use
a night vision scope. Monitoring
activities will consist of:
(1) Conducting baseline observation of
pinnipeds in the project area prior to
initiating project activities.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:27 Mar 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
(2) Conducting and recording
observations on pinnipeds in the
vicinity of the harbor for the duration of
the activity occurring when tides are
low enough for pinnipeds to haul out (2
ft, 0.61 m, or less).
(3) Conducting post-construction
observations of pinniped haul-outs in
the project area to determine whether
animals disturbed by the project
activities return to the haul-out.
Reporting
Boeing will notify NMFS 2 weeks
prior to initiation of each activity. After
each activity is completed, Boeing will
provide a report to NMFS within 90
days. This report will provide dates and
locations of specific activities, details of
seal behavioral observations, and
estimates of the amount and nature of
all takes of seals by harassment or in
other ways. In addition, the report will
include information on the weather, the
tidal state, the horizontal visibility, and
the composition (species, gender, and
age class) and locations of haul-out
group(s). In the unanticipated event that
any cases of pinniped injury or
mortality are judged to result from these
activities, this will be reported to NMFS
immediately.
Endangered Species Act
This action will not affect species
listed under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) that are under the jurisdiction of
NMFS. VAFB formally consulted with
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) in
1998 on the possible take of southern
sea otters during Boeing’s harbor
activities at south VAFB. A Biological
Opinion was issued in August 2001.
The activities covered by this IHA are
analyzed in that Biological Opinion, and
this IHA does not modify the action in
a manner that was not previously
analyzed.
National Environmental Policy Act
The USAF prepared an
Environmental Assessment (EA) for
Harbor Activities Associated with the
Delta IV Program at Vandenberg Air
Force Base (ENSRI, 2001). In 2004,
NMFS prepared an EA updating the
information contained in the USAF EA
and issued a Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) on the issuance of a
new 5–year rule and LOAs (69 FR 5720,
February 6, 2004). In accordance with
section 6.01 of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration
Administrative Order (NAO) 216–6
(Environmental Review Procedures for
Implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act, May 20,
1999), NMFS has preliminarily
determined, based on the content and
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14655
analysis of Boeing’s current request for
an IHA and the 2004 EA and FONSI,
that the proposed issuance of this IHA
to Boeing by NMFS will not
individually or cumulatively result in a
significant impact on the quality of the
human environment as defined in 40
CFR 1508.27. Impacts are not expected
to be outside the scope of that EA.
Therefore, this action is categorically
excluded from further environmental
review under NAO 216–6.
Preliminary Conclusions
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA to
Boeing for harbor activities related to
the Delta IV/EELV to take place at south
VAFB over a 1–year period. The
proposal to issue this IHA is contingent
upon adherence to the previously
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements. NMFS has
preliminarily determined that the
impact of harbor activities related to the
Delta IV/EELV at VAFB, including:
transport vessel operations, cargo
movement activities, harbor
maintenance dredging, and kelp habitat
mitigation would result in the
harassment of only small numbers of
Pacific harbor seals, California sea lions,
and northern elephant seals; would
have no more negligible impact on these
marine mammal stocks; and would not
have an unmitigable adverse impact on
the availability of marine mammal
stocks for subsistence uses. Northern fur
seals, Guadalupe fur seals, and Steller
sea lions are unlikely to be found in the
area and, therefore, will not be affected.
While behavioral modifications may be
made by harbor seals and California sea
lions to avoid the resultant acoustic and
visual stimuli, there is no potential for
large-scale movements, such as
stampedes, since these species haul out
in such small numbers near the site
(maximum number of harbor seals
hauled out in one day estimated at 43
seals, averaging at 21 seals per day,
maximum number of California sea
lions hauled out in one day is estimated
at six). The effects of Boeing’s harbor
activities are expected to be limited to
short-term and localized behavioral
changes.
Due to the localized nature of these
activities, the number of marine
mammals potentially taken by
harassment are estimated to be small. In
addition, no take by injury or death is
anticipated, and the potential for
temporary or permanent hearing
impairment is unlikely given the low
noise levels expected at the site. No
rookeries, mating grounds, areas of
concentrated feeding, or other areas of
special significance for marine
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
14656
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Notices
mammals occur within or near south
VAFB harbor.
Information Solicited
NMFS requests interested persons to
submit comments and information
concerning this request (see ADDRESSES).
Prior to submitting comments, NMFS
recommends readers review NMFS’
responses to those comments on this
activity submitted previously (see 67 FR
63151, May 23, 2002, 68 FR 36540, June
18, 2003, and 69 FR 29696, May 25,
2004).
Dated: March 16, 2005.
Michael Payne,
Division Chief, Marine Mammal and Turtle
Conservation District, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–5753 Filed 3–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 031105F]
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Commercial Fishing Operations;
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction
Plan Regulations; Public Hearings
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public hearing.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On March 14, 2005, NMFS
announced its intent to hold 12 public
hearings in Maine, Massachusetts,
Rhode Island, New Jersey, Maryland,
Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida in
March and April 2005 for the purpose
of answering questions and receiving
public testimony on the Atlantic Large
Whale Take Reduction Plan (ALWTRP)
draft environmental impact statement
(DEIS). NMFS will hold an additional
public hearing in East Machias, Maine
in April 2005.
DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
under the heading ‘‘Hearing Dates,
Times, and Locations’’ for the dates and
locations of the public hearings.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diane Borggaard, NMFS, Northeast
Region, 978–281–9300 ext. 6503; Barb
Zoodsma, NMFS, Southeast Region,
904–321–2806; or Kristy Long, NMFS,
Office of Protected Resources, 301–713–
2322.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 25, 2005, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) published a
Notice of Availability in the Federal
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:27 Mar 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
Register announcing the availability of
the DEIS for public review and
comment. The DEIS is open for public
comment from February 25, 2005 to
April 26, 2005. The public has the
opportunity to submit comments on the
document by any one of the following
methods:
(1) NMFS/Northeast Region Website:
https://www.nero.noaa.gov/nero/regs/
com. Follow the instructions on the
website for submitting comments.
(2) E-mail:
whaledeis.comments@noaa.gov.
(3) Mail: Mary Colligan, Assistant
Regional Administrator for Protected
Resources, NMFS, Northeast Region, 1
Blackburn Dr., Gloucester, MA 01930,
ATTN: ALWTRP DEIS.
(4) Facsimile (fax) to: 978–281–9394,
ATTN: ALWTRP DEIS.
(5) Public hearings: submit oral
comments at one of the DEIS public
hearings.
NMFS has scheduled another public
hearing on the DEIS in addition to the
12 already announced (70 FR 12446,
March 14, 2005). The purpose of these
hearings is to provide an opportunity for
the public to ask questions on the DEIS,
as well as to submit formal oral
testimony on the document during the
comment period. Information on the
public hearings can also be found on the
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction
Plan (ALWTRP) website at https://
www.nero.noaa.gov/whaletrp/.
Hearing Dates, Times, and Locations
The date, time, and location of the
hearing is as follows:
Wednesday, April 6, 2005 - East
Machias, ME - 6–9 p.m.—Washington
Academy (Gardner Gym), One High
Street, East Machias, ME 04630
Special Accommodations
These hearings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Diane Borggaard at
978–281–9300 ext. 6503 at least 7
working days prior to the hearing date.
Dated: March 17, 2005.
Donna S. Weiting,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–5751 Filed 3–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 020905A]
Endangered Species; File No. 1449
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Issuance of permit.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
Christine A. Tomichek, Kleinschmidt
Associates, Kleinschmidt Building, 35
Pratt Street, Essex, Connecticut, 06426,
has been issued a permit to take
shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser
brevirostrum) for purposes of scientific
research.
ADDRESSES: The permit and related
documents are available for review
upon written request or by appointment
in the following office(s):
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
(301) 713–2289; fax (301) 427–2521; and
Northeast Region, NMFS, One
Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 019302298; phone (978) 281–9200; fax (978)
281–9371.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Jefferies or Amy Sloan,
(301)713–2289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
18, 2004, notice was published in the
Federal Register (69 FR 51267) that a
request for a scientific research permit
to take shortnose sturgeon had been
submitted by the above-named
individual. The requested permit has
been issued under the authority of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
and the regulations governing the
taking, importing, and exporting of
endangered and threatened species (50
CFR parts 222–226).
Ms. Tomichek is authorized to
conduct three projects. In the first
project, 30 captively bred juvenile
sturgeon will be externally radio tagged,
released into the canal, tracked and
recaptured after exiting the canal. In the
second project, 50 adult sturgeon will be
captured annually for four years via
trawls and gillnets, measured, weighed,
a subset of 20 PIT tagged and externally
radio tagged, released and tracked. In
the third project, 200 eggs and larvae
will be captured via D-nets and
preserved to evaluate spawning
behavior. This permit is authorized for
five years.
E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM
23MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14651-14656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5753]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 020205E]
Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Harbor Activities Related to the Delta IV/Evolved Expendable Launch
Vehicle at Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of application and proposed authorization for
incidental harassment of marine mammals; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request from The Boeing Company (Boeing)
for a reauthorization to take small numbers of marine mammals by
harassment incidental to harbor activities related to the Delta IV/
Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) at south Vandenberg Air Force
Base, CA (VAFB). Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is
requesting comments on its proposal to authorize Boeing to take, by
harassment, small numbers of several species of pinnipeds at south VAFB
beginning in May 2005.
[[Page 14652]]
DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than April
22, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the application should be addressed to Steve
Leathery, Chief, Permits, Conservation, and Education Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-
West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225. The mailbox address for
providing e-mail comments on this action is PR1.020205E@noaa.gov.
Comments sent via e-mail, including attachments, must not exceed a 10-
megabyte file size. Comments may also be submitted via facsimile at
(301) 427-2521. A copy of the application containing a list of
references used in this document may be obtained by writing to this
address, by telephoning the contact listed here (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) or online at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/
PR1/Small_Take/smalltake_info.htm#applications.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolie Harrison, (301) 713-2289, ext.
166 or Monica DeAngelis, (562) 980-3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
Permission for incidental takings may be granted if NMFS finds that
the taking will have no more than a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses, and that
the permissible methods of taking and requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking are set forth.
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.
Subsection 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited
process by which citizens of the United States can apply for an
authorization to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by
harassment. Except for certain categories of activities not pertinent
here, the MMPA defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [``Level A harassment'']; or (ii) has the potential to disturb
a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[``Level B harassment''].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time limit for NMFS
review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice and comment
period on any proposed authorizations for the incidental harassment of
small numbers of marine mammals. Within 45 days of the close of the
comment period, NMFS must either issue or deny issuance of the
authorization.
Summary of Request
On December 21, 2004, NMFS received an application from Boeing
requesting an authorization for the harassment of small numbers of
Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardsi) and California sea
lions (Zalophus californianus) incidental to harbor activities related
to the Delta IV/EELV, including: transport vessel operations, cargo
movement activities, harbor maintenance dredging, and kelp habitat
mitigation operations. In addition, northern elephant seals (Mirounga
angustirostris) may also be incidentally harassed but in even smaller
numbers. Incidental Harassment Authorizations (IHAs) were issued to
Boeing on May 15, 2002 (67 FR 36151, May 23, 2002), May 20, 2003 (68 FR
36540, June 18, 2003), and on May 20, 2004 (69 FR 29696, May 25, 2004)
each for a 1-year period. The harbor where activities will take place
is on south VAFB approximately 2.5 mi (4.02 km) south of Point
Arguello, CA and approximately 1 mi (1.61 km) north of the nearest
marine mammal pupping site (i.e., Rocky Point).
Specified Activities
Delta Mariner off-loading operations and associated cargo movements
will occur a maximum of 3 times per year. The Delta Mariner is a 312-ft
(95.1-m) long, 84-ft (25.6-m) wide steel hull ocean-going vessel
capable of operating at a 8-ft (2.4-m) draft. For the first few visits
to the south VAFB harbor, tug boats will accompany the Delta Mariner.
Sources of noise from the Delta Mariner include ventilating propellers
used for maneuvering into position and the cargo bay door when it
becomes disengaged. Removal of the common booster core (CBC) from the
Delta Mariner requires use of an elevating platform transporter (EPT),
an additional source of noise with sound levels measured at
approximately 85 dB A-weighted (re 20 microPascals at 1-m) 20 ft (6.1
m) from the engine exhaust when the engine is running mid-speed
(Acentech, 1998). Procedures require two short (approximately 1/3
second) beeps of the horn prior to starting the ignition. The sound
level of the EPT horn ranged from 62-70 dB A-weighted at 200 ft (60.9
m) away, and 84-112 dB A-weighted at 25 ft (7.6 m) away. Containers
containing flight hardware items will be towed off the Delta Mariner by
a tractor tug that generates a sound level of approximately 87 dB A-
weighted at 50 ft (15.2 m) while in operational mode. Total time of
Delta Mariner docking and cargo movement activities is estimated at
approximately between 14 and 18 hours in good weather.
To accommodate the Delta Mariner, the harbor will need to be
dredged, removing approximately 3,000 to 5,000 cubic yards of sediment
per dredging. Dredging will involve the use of heavy equipment,
including a clamshell dredge, dredging crane, a small tug, dredging
barge, dump trucks, and a skip loader. Measured sound levels from this
equipment are roughly equivalent to those estimated for the wharf
modification equipment: 43 to 81 dB A-weighted at 250 ft (76.2 m).
Dredge operations, from set-up to tear-down, would continue 24-hours a
day for 3 to 5 weeks. Sedimentation surveys have shown that initial
dredging indicates that maintenance dredging should be required
annually or twice per year, depending on the hardware delivery
schedule.
A more detailed description of the work proposed for 2005 is
contained in the application which is available upon request (see
ADDRESSES) and in the Final US Air Force Environmental Assessment for
Harbor Activities Associated with the Delta IV Program at Vandenberg
Air Force Base (ENSR International, 2001).
Habitat and Marine Mammals Affected by the Activity
Pacific Harbor Seals
The marine mammal species likely to be harassed incidental to
harbor activities at south VAFB are the Pacific harbor seal and the
California sea lion. The most recent estimate of the Pacific harbor
seal population in California is 27,863 seals. Since 1990 there has
been no net population growth along the mainland or the Channel
Islands. The decrease in population growth rate has
[[Page 14653]]
occurred at the same time as a decrease in human-caused mortality and
may indicate that the population has reached its environmental carrying
capacity (Carretta et al., 2004). The total population of harbor seals
on VAFB is now estimated to be 1,099 (maximum of 515 seals hauled out
at one time on south VAFB) based on sighting surveys and telemetry data
(SRS Technologies, 2003).
The daily haul-out behavior of harbor seals along the south VAFB
coastline is primarily dependent on time of day. The highest number of
seals haul-out at south VAFB between 1100 through 1600 hours. In
addition, haul-out behavior at all sites seems to be influenced by
environmental factors such as high swell, tide height, and wind. The
combination of all three may prevent seals from hauling out at most
sites. The number of seals hauled out at any site can vary greatly from
day to day based on environmental conditions. Harbor seals occasionally
haul out at a beach 250 ft (76.2 m) west of the south VAFB harbor and
on rocks outside the harbor breakwater where Boeing will be conducting
Delta Mariner operations, cargo loading, dredging activities, and reef
enhancement activities. The maximum number of seals present during the
2001 dredging of the harbor was 23 (averaging 7 per observation period)
and the maximum number hauled out during the 2002 wharf modification
activities was 43, averaging 21 per day when tidal conditions were
favorable for hauling out. Dredging and reef enhancement did not occur
in 2004. The harbor seal pupping site closest to south VAFB harbor is
at Rocky Point, approximately 1 mi (1.6 km) north of the harbor.
Several factors affect the seasonal haul-out behavior of harbor
seals including environmental conditions, reproduction, and molting.
Harbor seal numbers at VAFB begin to increase in March during the
pupping season (March to June) as females spend more time on shore
nursing pups. The number of hauled-out seals is at its highest during
the molt which occurs from May through July. During the molting season,
tagged harbor seals at VAFB increased their time spent on shore by 22.4
percent; however, all seals continued to make daily trips to sea to
forage. Molting harbor seals entering the water because of a
disturbance are not adversely affected in their ability to molt and do
not endure thermoregulatory stress. During pupping and molting season,
harbor seals at the south VAFB sites expand into haul-out areas that
are not used the rest of the year. The number of seals hauled out
begins to decrease in August after the molt is complete and reaches the
lowest number in late fall and early winter.
California Sea Lions
During the wharf modification activity in June-July 2002,
California sea lions were observed hauling out on the breakwater in
small numbers (up to 6 individuals). Although this is considered to be
an unusual occurrence and is possibly related to fish schooling in the
area, Boeing included sea lions in their request.
California sea lions range from British Columbia to Mexico. The
most recent population estimates for the California sea lions range
from 237,000 to 244,000 individuals (Caretta et al., 2004). Between
1975 and 2001, the population growth rate was 5.4-6.1 percent. A 1985-
1987 population survey indicated that most individuals on the Northern
Channel Islands were on San Miguel Island, with the population ranging
from 2,235 to over 17,000. The largest numbers of California sea lions
in the VAFB vicinity occur at Lion Rock, 0.4 mi (0.64 km) southeast of
Point Sal. This area is approximately 1.5 mi (2.41 km) north of the
VAFB boundary. At least 100 sea lions can be observed during any season
at this site. The Point Arguello beaches and the rocky ledges of South
Rocky Point on south VAFB are haulout areas that may be used by
California sea lions. In 2003, at least 145 sea lions were observed at
Rocky Point, including five pups that did not survive due to
abandonment shortly after birth. This was thought to be an El Nino
effect, as there had never been any previously reported sea lion births
at VAFB (Thorson, 2003).
Each year, small groups of sea lions have been observed heading
south along the VAFB coastline in April and May (Tetra Tech, 1997).
Starting in August, large groups of sea lions can be seen moving north,
in groups varying in size from 25 to more than 300 (Roest, 1995). This
concurs with established migration patterns (Reeves et al., 1992;
Roest, 1995). Juvenile sea lions can be observed hauled-out with harbor
seals along the South Base sites from July through September (Tetra
Tech, 1997). Starving and exhausted subadult sea lions are fairly
common on central California beaches during the months of July and
August (Roest, 1995).
During the breeding season, most of California sea lions inhabit
southern California and Mexico. Rookery sites in southern California
are limited to San Miguel Island and to the southerly Channel Islands
of San Nicolas, Santa Barbara, and San Clemente. Breeding season begins
in mid-May, occurring within 10 days of arrival at the rookeries.
Molting occurs gradually over several months in the late summer and
fall. Because the molt is not catastrophic, the sea lions can enter the
water to feed.
Male California sea lions migrate annually. In the spring they
migrate southward to breeding rookeries in the Channel Islands and
Mexico, then migrate northward in the late summer following breeding
season. Females appear to remain near the breeding rookeries. The
greatest population on land occurs in September and October during the
post-breeding dispersal and although many of the sea lions,
particularly juveniles and sub-adult and adult males, may move north
away from the Channel Islands.
Other Marine Mammals
Other marine mammal species are rare to infrequent along the south
VAFB coast during certain times of the year and are unlikely to be
harassed by Boeing's activities. These four species are: the northern
elephant seal, the northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus), Guadalupe
fur seal (Arctocephalus townsendi), and Steller sea lions (Eumetopias
jubatus). Northern elephant seals may occur on VAFB but do not haul out
in the harbor area. Northern fur seals, Guadalupe fur seals and Steller
sea lions occur along the California coast and Northern Channel Islands
but are not likely to be found on VAFB. Descriptions of the biology and
local distribution of these species can be found in the application as
well as other sources such as Stewart and Yochem (1994, 1984), Forney
et al. (2000), Koski et al. (1998), Barlow et al. (1993), Stewart and
DeLong (1995), and Lowry et al. (1992). NMFS Stock Assessments can be
viewed at: https://www.NMFS.noaa.gov/pr/PR2/Stock--Assessment--Program/
sars.html. Please refer to those documents for information on these
species.
Potential Effects of Activities on Marine Mammals
Acoustic and visual stimuli generated by the use of heavy equipment
during the Delta Mariner off-loading operations, dredging, and kelp
habitat mitigation, as well as the increased presence of personnel, may
cause short-term disturbance to harbor seals and California sea lions
hauled out along the beach and rocks in the vicinity of the south VAFB
harbor. This disturbance from acoustic and visual stimuli is the
principal means of marine mammal taking associated with these
activities.
[[Page 14654]]
Based on the measured sounds of construction equipment, such as
might be used during Boeing's activities, sound level intensity
decreases proportional to the square root of the distance from the
source. A dredging crane at the end of the dock producing 88 dBA of
noise would be approximately 72 dBA at the nearest beach or the end of
the breakwater, roughly 250 ft (76.2 m) away. The EPT produces
approximately 85 dBA, measured less than 20 ft (6 m) from the engine
exhaust, when the engine is running at mid speed. The EPT operation
procedure requires two short beeps of the horn (approximately 1/3 of a
second each) prior to starting the ignition. Sound level measurements
for the horn ranged from 84 to 112 dBA at 25 ft (7.6 m) away and 62 to
70 dBA at 200 ft (61 m) away. The highest measurement was taken from
the side of the vehicle where the horn is mounted. Ambient background
noise measured approximately 250 ft (76.2 m) from the beach was
estimated to be 35-48 dB A-weighted (Acentech, 1998; EPA, 1971).
Pinnipeds sometimes show startle reactions when exposed to sudden
brief sounds. An acoustic stimulus with sudden onset (such as a sonic
boom) may be analogous to a ``looming'' visual stimulus (Hayes and
Saif, 1967), which may elicit flight away from the source (Berrens et
al., 1988). The onset of operations by a loud sound source, such as the
EPT during CBC off-loading procedures, may elicit such a reaction. In
addition, the movements of cranes and dredges may represent a
``looming'' visual stimulus to seals hauled out in close proximity.
Seals and sea lions exposed to such acoustic and visual stimuli may
either exhibit a startle response and/or leave the haul-out site.
According to the MMPA, if harbor activities disrupt the behavioral
patterns of harbor seals, these activities would take marine mammals by
Level B harassment. In general, if the received level of the noise
stimulus exceeds both the background (ambient) noise level and the
auditory threshold of the animals, and especially if the stimulus is
novel to them, there may be a behavioral response. The probability and
degree of response will also depend on the season, the group
composition of the pinnipeds, and the type of activity in which they
are engaged. Minor and brief responses, such as short-duration startle
or alert reactions, are not likely to constitute disruption of
behavioral patterns, such as migration, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (i.e., Level B harassment) and would not cause serious
injury or mortality to marine mammals.
On the other hand, startle and alert reactions accompanied by
large-scale movements, such as stampedes into the water, may rise to
the level of Level B harassment and could result in injury of
individuals. In addition, such large-scale movements by dense
aggregations of marine mammals or on pupping sites could potentially
lead to takes by serious injury or death. However, there is no
potential for large-scale movements leading to serious injury or
mortality near the south VAFB harbor, because on average the number of
harbor seals hauled out near the site on average is less than 30 and
there is no pupping at nearby sites. The effects of the harbor
activities are expected to be limited to short-term startle responses
and localized behavioral changes.
According to the June 2002 dock modification construction report
(ENSRI, 2002), the maximum number of harbor seals hauled out each day
ranged from 23 to 25 animals. There were 15 occasions in which
construction noise, vehicle noise, or noise from a fishing boat caused
the seals to lift their heads. Flushing only occurred due to fishing
activities which were unrelated to the construction activities. The sea
lions were less reactive to the construction noise than the harbor
seals. None of the construction activities caused any of the sea lions
to leave the jetty rocks and there was only one incident of a head
alert reaction.
The report from the December 2002 dredging activities show that the
number of Pacific harbor seals ranged from 0 to 19 and that California
sea lions did not haul out during the monitoring period. On 10
occasions, harbor seals showed head alerts although two of the alerts
were for disturbances that were not related to the project. No harbor
seals flushed during the activities on the dock.
For a further discussion of the anticipated effects of the planned
activities on harbor seals in the area, please refer to the application
and ENSR International's 2001 Final Environmental Assessment.
Information contained in the application and referenced sources as
updated by recent monitoring reports is adopted by NMFS as the best
information available on this subject.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected to be Harassed
Boeing estimates that a maximum of 43 harbor seals per day may be
hauled out near the south VAFB harbor, with a daily average of 21 seals
sighted when tidal conditions were favorable during previous dredging
operations in the harbor. Considering the maximum and average number of
seals hauled out per day, assuming that the seals may be seen twice a
day, and using a maximum total of 73 operating days in 2005-2006, NMFS
estimates that a maximum of 767 to 1570 Pacific harbor seals may be
subject to Level B harassment.
During wharf modification activities, a maximum of six California
sea lions were seen hauling out in a single day. Based on the above-
mentioned calculation, NMFS believes that a maximum of 219 California
sea lions and 10 northern elephant seals (because they may be in nearby
waters) may be subject to Level B harassment.
Possible Effects of Activities on Marine Mammal Habitat
Boeing anticipates no loss or modification to the habitat used by
Pacific harbor seals or California sea lions that haul out near the
south VAFB harbor. The harbor seal and sea lion haul-out sites near
south VAFB harbor are not used as breeding, molting, or mating sites;
therefore, it is not expected that the activities in the harbor will
have any impact on the ability of Pacific harbor seals or California
sea lions in the area to reproduce.
Boeing anticipates unavoidable kelp removal during dredging. This
habitat modification will not affect the marine mammal habitat.
However, Boeing will mitigate for the removal of kelp habitat by
placing 150 tons of rocky substrate in a sandy area between the
breakwater and the mooring dolphins to enhance an existing artificial
reef. This type of mitigation was implemented by the Army Corps of
Engineers following the 1984 and 1989 dredging. A lush kelp bed
adjacent to the sandy area has developed from the efforts. The
substrate will consist of approximately 150 sharp-faced boulders, each
with a diameter of about 2 ft (0.61 m) and each weighing about one ton.
The boulders will be brought in by truck from an off-site quarry and
loaded by crane onto a small barge at the wharf. The barge is towed by
a tugboat to a location along the mooring dolphins from which a small
barge-mounted crane can place them into the sandy area. Boeing plans to
perform the reef enhancement in conjunction with the next maintenance
dredging event in order to minimize cost and disturbances to animals.
Noise will be generated by the trucks delivering the boulders to the
harbor and during the operation of unloading the boulders onto the
barges and into the water.
[[Page 14655]]
Possible Effects of Activities on Subsistence Needs
There are no subsistence uses for Pacific harbor seals in
California waters, and thus, there are no anticipated effects on
subsistence needs.
Mitigation
To reduce the potential for disturbance from visual and acoustic
stimuli associated with the activities Boeing will undertake the
following marine mammal mitigating measures:
(1) If activities occur during nighttime hours, lighting will be
turned on before dusk and left on the entire night to avoid startling
harbor seals at night.
(2) Activities will be initiated before dusk.
(3) Construction noises must be kept constant (i.e., not
interrupted by periods of quiet in excess of 30 minutes) while harbor
seals are present.
(4) If activities cease for longer than 30 minutes and harbor seals
are in the area, start-up of activities will include a gradual increase
in noise levels.
(5) A NMFS-approved marine mammal observer will visually monitor
the harbor seals on the beach adjacent to the harbor and on rocks for
any flushing or other behaviors as a result of Boeing's activities (see
Monitoring).
(6) The Delta Mariner and accompanying vessels will enter the
harbor only when the tide is too high for harbor seals to haul-out on
the rocks and the vessel will reduce speed 1.5 to 2 knots (1.5-2.0 nm/
hr; 2.8-3.7 km/hr) once the vessel is within 3 mi (4.83 km) of the
harbor. The vessel will enter the harbor stern first, approaching the
wharf and mooring dolphins at less than 0.75 knot (1.4 km/hr).
(7) As alternate dredge methods are explored, the dredge contractor
may introduce quieter techniques and equipment.
Monitoring
As part of its 2002 application, Boeing provided a proposed
monitoring plan for assessing impacts to harbor seals from the
activities at south VAFB harbor and for determining when mitigation
measures should be employed. NMFS proposes the same plan for this IHA.
A NMFS-approved and VAFB-designated biologically trained observer
will monitor the area for pinnipeds during all harbor activities.
During nighttime activities, the harbor area will be illuminated, and
the monitor will use a night vision scope. Monitoring activities will
consist of:
(1) Conducting baseline observation of pinnipeds in the project
area prior to initiating project activities.
(2) Conducting and recording observations on pinnipeds in the
vicinity of the harbor for the duration of the activity occurring when
tides are low enough for pinnipeds to haul out (2 ft, 0.61 m, or less).
(3) Conducting post-construction observations of pinniped haul-outs
in the project area to determine whether animals disturbed by the
project activities return to the haul-out.
Reporting
Boeing will notify NMFS 2 weeks prior to initiation of each
activity. After each activity is completed, Boeing will provide a
report to NMFS within 90 days. This report will provide dates and
locations of specific activities, details of seal behavioral
observations, and estimates of the amount and nature of all takes of
seals by harassment or in other ways. In addition, the report will
include information on the weather, the tidal state, the horizontal
visibility, and the composition (species, gender, and age class) and
locations of haul-out group(s). In the unanticipated event that any
cases of pinniped injury or mortality are judged to result from these
activities, this will be reported to NMFS immediately.
Endangered Species Act
This action will not affect species listed under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) that are under the jurisdiction of NMFS. VAFB
formally consulted with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) in 1998 on
the possible take of southern sea otters during Boeing's harbor
activities at south VAFB. A Biological Opinion was issued in August
2001. The activities covered by this IHA are analyzed in that
Biological Opinion, and this IHA does not modify the action in a manner
that was not previously analyzed.
National Environmental Policy Act
The USAF prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for Harbor
Activities Associated with the Delta IV Program at Vandenberg Air Force
Base (ENSRI, 2001). In 2004, NMFS prepared an EA updating the
information contained in the USAF EA and issued a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) on the issuance of a new 5-year rule and
LOAs (69 FR 5720, February 6, 2004). In accordance with section 6.01 of
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Administrative
Order (NAO) 216-6 (Environmental Review Procedures for Implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act, May 20, 1999), NMFS has
preliminarily determined, based on the content and analysis of Boeing's
current request for an IHA and the 2004 EA and FONSI, that the proposed
issuance of this IHA to Boeing by NMFS will not individually or
cumulatively result in a significant impact on the quality of the human
environment as defined in 40 CFR 1508.27. Impacts are not expected to
be outside the scope of that EA. Therefore, this action is
categorically excluded from further environmental review under NAO 216-
6.
Preliminary Conclusions
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA to Boeing for harbor activities
related to the Delta IV/EELV to take place at south VAFB over a 1-year
period. The proposal to issue this IHA is contingent upon adherence to
the previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements. NMFS has preliminarily determined that the impact of
harbor activities related to the Delta IV/EELV at VAFB, including:
transport vessel operations, cargo movement activities, harbor
maintenance dredging, and kelp habitat mitigation would result in the
harassment of only small numbers of Pacific harbor seals, California
sea lions, and northern elephant seals; would have no more negligible
impact on these marine mammal stocks; and would not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of marine mammal stocks for
subsistence uses. Northern fur seals, Guadalupe fur seals, and Steller
sea lions are unlikely to be found in the area and, therefore, will not
be affected. While behavioral modifications may be made by harbor seals
and California sea lions to avoid the resultant acoustic and visual
stimuli, there is no potential for large-scale movements, such as
stampedes, since these species haul out in such small numbers near the
site (maximum number of harbor seals hauled out in one day estimated at
43 seals, averaging at 21 seals per day, maximum number of California
sea lions hauled out in one day is estimated at six). The effects of
Boeing's harbor activities are expected to be limited to short-term and
localized behavioral changes.
Due to the localized nature of these activities, the number of
marine mammals potentially taken by harassment are estimated to be
small. In addition, no take by injury or death is anticipated, and the
potential for temporary or permanent hearing impairment is unlikely
given the low noise levels expected at the site. No rookeries, mating
grounds, areas of concentrated feeding, or other areas of special
significance for marine
[[Page 14656]]
mammals occur within or near south VAFB harbor.
Information Solicited
NMFS requests interested persons to submit comments and information
concerning this request (see ADDRESSES). Prior to submitting comments,
NMFS recommends readers review NMFS' responses to those comments on
this activity submitted previously (see 67 FR 63151, May 23, 2002, 68
FR 36540, June 18, 2003, and 69 FR 29696, May 25, 2004).
Dated: March 16, 2005.
Michael Payne,
Division Chief, Marine Mammal and Turtle Conservation District,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05-5753 Filed 3-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S