Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 Series Airplanes, 14597-14599 [05-5699]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(2) For Model 757–300 series airplanes:
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757–28A0077,
dated August 27, 2004.
Hose Fitting and Spar Bonding Rework and
Sealant Application
(g) For Group 1 airplanes as identified in
the service bulletins: Within 48 months after
the effective date of this AD, rework the spar
bonding path between the end fitting of the
fuel feed hose and the front spar, and apply
sealant to the hose fitting on the forward and
aft side of the front spar and to the fitting and
tube coupling on both sides of the dry bay
wall, in accordance with the service
bulletins.
Bonding Resistance Test
(h) For Group 2 airplanes as identified in
the service bulletins: Within 48 months after
the effective date of this AD, do a bonding
resistance test between the fuel feed hose and
the front spars of the left and right wings, in
accordance with the service bulletins.
(1) If the test meets required resistance
limits, before further flight, apply sealant to
the end fitting of the fuel feed hose on the
aft side of the front spar and to the fitting and
tube coupling on both sides of the dry bay
wall, in accordance with the service
bulletins.
(2) If the test does not meet required
resistance limits, before further flight, remove
any existing sealant at the front spar; rework
the spar bonding path between the end fitting
of the fuel feed hose and the front spar to
meet bonding resistance test requirements;
and apply sealant to the end fitting of the fuel
feed hose on the forward and aft sides of the
front spar, and to the fitting and tube
coupling on both sides of the dry bay wall,
in accordance with the service bulletins.
Inspection of Electrical Bonding Jumper
(i) For all airplanes as identified in the
service bulletins: Within 48 months after the
effective date of this AD, perform a general
visual inspection and applicable corrective
actions to ensure that an electrical bonding
jumper is installed between the engine fuel
feed hose and the adjacent wing station
285.65 rib in the left and right wing fuel
tanks, in accordance with the service
bulletins.
Exception to Accomplishment Instructions
in Service Bulletins
(j) Although Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757–28A0076, and Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 757–28A0077, both dated August 27,
2004, permit operator’s equivalent
procedures (OEP), this AD would require you
to use the referenced AMMs, except that
operators may use their own FAA-approved
OEPs to drain the left and right engine fuel
tubes, to drain and ventilate the fuel tanks,
and for entering the fuel tanks.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(k) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:19 Mar 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
14, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–5698 Filed 3–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20687; Directorate
Identifier 2004–NM–171–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A319, A320, and A321 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A319, A320, and
A321 series airplanes. This proposed
AD would require modifying the floor
proximity emergency escape path
marking system. This proposed AD is
prompted by information that there is
not adequate floor path lighting and
marking for safe evacuation of the
airplane in the event of an emergency.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
inadequate lighting and marking of the
escape path, which could delay or
impede the flight crew and passengers
when exiting the airplane during an
emergency landing.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 22, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• By fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus, 1
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14597
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France.
You can examine the contents of this
AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street
SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of
the Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
This docket number is FAA–2005–
20687; the directorate identifier for this
docket is 2004–NM–171–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2125;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2005–20687; Directorate Identifier
2004–NM–171–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments submitted by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of our docket
Web site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You can
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you can visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You can examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
14598
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the DMS
receives them.
Discussion
´ ´
The Direction Generale de l’Aviation
Civile (DGAC), which is the
airworthiness authority for France,
notified us that an unsafe condition may
exist on certain Airbus Model A319,
A320, and A321 series airplanes. The
DGAC advises that the existing system
design of the BRUCE emergency power
supply units (EPSU) of the floor
proximity emergency escape path
marking system (FPEEPMS) installed on
these airplanes does not provide
adequate floor path lighting and
marking for safe evacuation of the
airplane in the event of an emergency.
Investigation revealed that the system
does not comply with the certification
requirements specified in section
121.310(c)(3) of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 121.310), which
includes the floor proximity emergency
escape path marking requirements in
section 25.812(L)(1), since none of the
connected components of the FPEEPMS,
including the exit identifiers, will
illuminate in the event of an emergency
landing if there is a vertical separation
of the fuselage forward of exit door
number 1. These conditions, if not
corrected, could impede or delay the
flight crew and passengers when exiting
the airplane during an emergency
landing.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
A320–33–1041, dated December 11,
2003. The service bulletin describes
procedures for modifying the FPEEPMS.
The modification includes removing the
BRUCE and DIEHL EPSUs of the
FPEEPMS; modifying the wiring;
installing placards; and installing new,
improved DIEHL EPSUs. Accomplishing
the actions specified in the service
information is intended to adequately
address the unsafe condition. The
DGAC mandated the service information
and issued French airworthiness
directive F–2004–121 R1, dated October
13, 2004, to ensure the continued
airworthiness of these airplanes in
France.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
These airplane models are
manufactured in France and are type
certificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of section
21.29 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the
applicable bilateral airworthiness
agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:19 Mar 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has
kept the FAA informed of the situation
described above. We have examined the
DGAC’s findings, evaluated all pertinent
information, and determined that we
need to issue an AD for products of this
type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the
actions specified in the service
information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
This proposed AD would affect about
236 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
proposed actions would take about 20
work hours per airplane, at an average
labor rate of $65 per work hour.
Required parts would cost about $280
per airplane. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the proposed
replacement for U.S. operators is
$372,880, or $1,580 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the
regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2005–20687;
Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–171–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
must receive comments on this AD action by
April 22, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A319,
A320, and A321 series airplanes; certificated
in any category; in which the floor proximity
emergency escape path marking system
(FPEEPMS) is equipped with BRUCE
emergency power supply units (EPSUs)
having BRUCE part number (P/N) 100865 or
DIEHL P/Ns 3214–51, –52, –54, or –55.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by information
that there is not adequate floor path lighting
and marking for safe evacuation of the
airplane in the event of an emergency. We are
issuing this AD to prevent inadequate
lighting and marking of the escape path,
which could delay or impede the flight crew
and passengers when exiting the airplane
during an emergency landing.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Replacement
(f) Within 17 months after the effective
date of this AD: Modify the FPEEPMS by
doing all the actions specified in the
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–33–1041, dated
December 11, 2003.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(g) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(h) French airworthiness directive F–2004–
121 R1, dated October 13, 2004, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 9,
2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–5699 Filed 3–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2002–NM–306–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell
Douglas Model DC–9–10, DC–9–20,
DC–9–30, DC–9–40, and DC–9–50
Series Airplanes; and Model DC–9–81
(MD–81) and DC–9–82 (MD–82)
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
This action withdraws a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that proposed superseding an existing
airworthiness directive (AD), applicable
to certain McDonnell Douglas transport
category airplanes. That action would
have required inspection for proper
installation, damage, or abrasion of the
power feeder cables and trough
installations; proper installation of
caterpillar grommets in the lightening
holes; and repair if necessary. The
proposed rule also would have required
modification of the power feeder cable
installation and added airplanes to the
applicability of the existing AD. Since
the issuance of the NPRM, the FAA has
received new data indicating that the
applicability and required actions of the
existing AD adequately address the
unsafe condition that is identified in the
existing AD. Accordingly, the proposed
AD is withdrawn.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elvin Wheeler, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–
SUMMARY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:19 Mar 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
130L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712–4137; telephone (562) 627–5344;
fax (562) 627–5210.
A
proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD), applicable to certain
McDonnell Douglas transport category
airplanes, was published in the Federal
Register as a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) on September 19,
2003 (68 FR 54864). The proposed rule
would have required inspection for
proper installation, damage, or abrasion
of the power feeder cables and trough
installations; proper installation of
caterpillar grommets in the lightening
holes; and repair if necessary. The
proposed rule also would have required
modification of the power feeder cable
installation and added airplanes to the
applicability of existing AD 85–25–06,
amendment 39–5177 (50 FR 49833,
December 5, 1985). That action was
prompted by reports of chafing and/or
abrasion of the power feeder cables and
six instances of shorted power feeder
cables. The proposed actions were
intended to prevent a possible loss of
electrical bus power, which could result
in a potential fire ignition source and
consequent fire in the cabin.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Actions That Occurred Since the NPRM
Was Issued
Since the issuance of that NPRM, we
have had clarification from the
manufacturer that no additional
airplanes have been identified that may
be affected by the unsafe condition
described above, other than those
specified in McDonnell Douglas DC–9
Service Bulletin 24–78, dated April 9,
1985. That service bulletin was
specified in AD 85–25–06 as the
appropriate source of service
information for that AD.
FAA’s Conclusions
Upon further consideration, the FAA
has determined that, since DC–9 Service
Bulletin 27–78, dated April 9, 1985, is
the service information cited in AD 85–
25–06 and no additional airplanes have
been identified that may be affected by
the unsafe condition, it is unnecessary
to supersede that AD. Accordingly, the
proposed rule is hereby withdrawn.
Withdrawal of this NPRM constitutes
only such action, and does not preclude
the agency from issuing another action
in the future, nor does it commit the
agency to any course of action in the
future.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14599
Regulatory Impact
Since this action only withdraws a
notice of proposed rulemaking, it is
neither a proposed nor a final rule and
therefore is not covered under Executive
Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, or DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979).
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Withdrawal
Accordingly, the notice of proposed
rulemaking, Docket 2002–NM–306–AD,
published in the Federal Register on
September 19, 2003 (68 FR 54864), is
withdrawn.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
14, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–5700 Filed 3–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2004–19473; Directorate
Identifier 2004–CE–35–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; GROB–
WERKE Model G120A Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain GROB–WERKE Model G120A
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require you to replace the main landing
gear (MLG) up-lock hook assembly. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) issued by the airworthiness
authority for Germany. We are issuing
this proposed AD to prevent the MLG
from becoming jammed and not
extending, which could result in loss of
control of the airplane during landing.
DATES: We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by May 10, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following to
submit comments on this proposed AD:
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 23, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14597-14599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5699]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-20687; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-171-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321
Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require modifying the floor proximity emergency
escape path marking system. This proposed AD is prompted by information
that there is not adequate floor path lighting and marking for safe
evacuation of the airplane in the event of an emergency. We are
proposing this AD to prevent inadequate lighting and marking of the
escape path, which could delay or impede the flight crew and passengers
when exiting the airplane during an emergency landing.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 22, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
By fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France.
You can examine the contents of this AD docket on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., room PL-401,
on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Washington, DC. This docket
number is FAA-2005-20687; the directorate identifier for this docket is
2004-NM-171-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2005-20687;
Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-171-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments submitted by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of our
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You can review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
can visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
[[Page 14598]]
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after the
DMS receives them.
Discussion
The Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC),
which is the airworthiness authority for France, notified us that an
unsafe condition may exist on certain Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321
series airplanes. The DGAC advises that the existing system design of
the BRUCE emergency power supply units (EPSU) of the floor proximity
emergency escape path marking system (FPEEPMS) installed on these
airplanes does not provide adequate floor path lighting and marking for
safe evacuation of the airplane in the event of an emergency.
Investigation revealed that the system does not comply with the
certification requirements specified in section 121.310(c)(3) of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 121.310), which includes the floor
proximity emergency escape path marking requirements in section
25.812(L)(1), since none of the connected components of the FPEEPMS,
including the exit identifiers, will illuminate in the event of an
emergency landing if there is a vertical separation of the fuselage
forward of exit door number 1. These conditions, if not corrected,
could impede or delay the flight crew and passengers when exiting the
airplane during an emergency landing.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-33-1041, dated December 11,
2003. The service bulletin describes procedures for modifying the
FPEEPMS. The modification includes removing the BRUCE and DIEHL EPSUs
of the FPEEPMS; modifying the wiring; installing placards; and
installing new, improved DIEHL EPSUs. Accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information is intended to adequately address
the unsafe condition. The DGAC mandated the service information and
issued French airworthiness directive F-2004-121 R1, dated October 13,
2004, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in
France.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
These airplane models are manufactured in France and are type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. We have examined the DGAC's findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and determined that we need to
issue an AD for products of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in the service information
described previously.
Costs of Compliance
This proposed AD would affect about 236 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The proposed actions would take about 20 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Required parts would cost
about $280 per airplane. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of
the proposed replacement for U.S. operators is $372,880, or $1,580 per
airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2005-20687; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-
171-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration must receive comments on
this AD action by April 22, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 series
airplanes; certificated in any category; in which the floor
proximity emergency escape path marking system (FPEEPMS) is equipped
with BRUCE emergency power supply units (EPSUs) having BRUCE part
number (P/N) 100865 or DIEHL P/Ns 3214-51, -52, -54, or -55.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by information that there is not
adequate floor path lighting and marking for safe evacuation of the
airplane in the event of an emergency. We are issuing this AD to
prevent inadequate lighting and marking of the escape path, which
could delay or impede the flight crew and passengers when exiting
the airplane during an emergency landing.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Replacement
(f) Within 17 months after the effective date of this AD: Modify
the FPEEPMS by doing all the actions specified in the
[[Page 14599]]
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-33-1041,
dated December 11, 2003.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(h) French airworthiness directive F-2004-121 R1, dated October
13, 2004, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 9, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-5699 Filed 3-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P