Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Contract Modifications, 14629-14630 [05-5624]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Part 243
[DFARS Case 2003–D024]
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Contract
Modifications
Department of Defense (DoD).
Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
update text pertaining to contract
modifications. This proposed rule is a
result of a transformation initiative
undertaken by DoD to dramatically
change the purpose and content of the
DFARS.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before May
23, 2005, to be considered in the
formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by DFARS Case 2003–D024,
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Defense Acquisition Regulations
Web site: https://emissary.acq.osd.mil/
dar/dfars.nsf/pubcomm. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2003–D024 in the subject
line of the message.
• Fax: (703) 602–0350.
• Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council, Attn: Ms. Michele
Peterson, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DAR),
IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3062.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council,
Crystal Square 4, Suite 200A, 241 18th
Street, Arlington, VA 22202–3402.
All comments received will be posted
to https://emissary.acq.osd.mil/dar/
dfars.nsf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms.
Michele Peterson, (703) 602–0311.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
DFARS Transformation is a major
DoD initiative to dramatically change
the purpose and content of the DFARS.
The objective is to improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of the
acquisition process, while allowing the
acquisition workforce the flexibility to
innovate. The transformed DFARS will
contain only requirements of law, DoDwide policies, delegations of FAR
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:19 Mar 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
authorities, deviations from FAR
requirements, and policies/procedures
that have a significant effect beyond the
internal operating procedures of DoD or
a significant cost or administrative
impact on contractors or offerors.
Additional information on the DFARS
Transformation initiative is available at
https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dfars/
transf.htm.
This proposed rule is a result of the
DFARS Transformation initiative. The
proposed changes—
• Delete unnecessary text at DFARS
243.102, 243.105(a)(ii), 243.107, and
243.204–71.
• Delete obsolete text at DFARS
243.105(a)(i).
• Update text at DFARS 243.107–70
for consistency with the requirements of
the clause at DFARS 252.249–7002,
Notification of Anticipated Contract
Termination or Reduction.
• Clarify procedures at DFARS
243.204–70 for determining if a request
for equitable contract adjustment meets
the dollar threshold for requiring
contractor certification.
• Delete text at DFARS 243.170,
243.171, and 243.204 containing
procedures for identification of foreign
military sales requirements, for
obligation or deobligation of contract
funds, and for review and definitization
of contract change orders. This text will
be relocated to the new DFARS
companion resource, Procedures,
Guidance, and Information (PGI),
available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/
dpap/dars/pgi.
This rule was not subject to Office of
Management and Budget review under
Executive Order 12866, dated
September 30, 1993.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this rule to have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule makes no significant
change to DoD contracting policy.
Therefore, DoD has not performed an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
DoD invites comments from small
businesses and other interested parties.
DoD also will consider comments from
small entities concerning the affected
DFARS subparts in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 610. Such comments should be
submitted separately and should cite
DFARS Case 2003–D024.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the rule does not
impose any information collection
requirements that require the approval
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14629
of the Office of Management and Budget
under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 243
Government procurement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48
CFR part 243 as follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 243 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR
Chapter 1.
PART 243—CONTRACT
MODIFICATIONS
243.102, 243.105, and 243.107
[Removed]
2. Sections 243.102, 243.105, and
243.107 are removed.
3. Section 243.107–70 is amended by
revising the second sentence to read as
follows:
243.107–70 Notification of substantial
impact on employment.
* * * The clause prescribed at
249.7003(c) requires that the contractor
notify its employees, its subcontractors,
and State and local officials when a
contract modification will have a
substantial impact on employment.
4. Sections 243.170 and 243.171 are
revised to read as follows:
243.170 Identification of foreign military
sale (FMS) requirements.
Follow the procedures at PGI 243.170
for identifying contract modifications
that add FMS requirements.
243.171
funds.
Obligation or deobligation of
Follow the procedures at PGI 243.171
when obligating or deobligating funds.
5. Section 243.204 is revised to read
as follows:
243.204
Administration.
Follow the procedures at PGI 243.204
for review and definitization of change
orders.
6. Section 243.204–70 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
243.204–70 Certification of requests for
equitable adjustment.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) To determine if the dollar
threshold for requiring certification is
met, add together the absolute value of
each cost increase and each cost
decrease. See PGI 243.204–70(b) for an
example.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
14630
243.204–71
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules
[Removed]
7. Section 243.204–71 is removed.
[FR Doc. 05–5624 Filed 3–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No.050317076–5076–01; I.D.
030405C]
RIN 0648–AT01
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Quota
Specifications and General Category
Effort Controls
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments; notice of public hearings.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes initial 2005
fishing year specifications for the
Atlantic bluefin tuna (BFT) fishery to set
BFT quotas for each of the established
domestic fishing categories and to set
General category effort controls. This
action is necessary to implement
recommendations of the International
Commission for the Conservation of
Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), as required by
the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act
(ATCA), and to achieve domestic
management objectives under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act). NMFS will
hold public hearings to receive
comments on these proposed actions.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 18, 2005.
The public hearing dates are:
1. April 8, 2005, from 3 p.m. to 4:30
p.m. in Gloucester, MA.
2. April 11, 2005, from 7 p.m. to 8:30
p.m. in Morehead City, NC.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted through any of the following
methods:
• Email: 05BFTSPECS@noaa.gov.
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Dianne Stephan, Highly
Migratory Species Management
Division, Office of Sustainable Fisheries
(F/SF1), NMFS, One Blackburn Dr.,
Gloucester, MA 01930.
• Fax: 978–281–9340.
The public hearing locations are:
1. Northeast Regional Office, NMFS, 1
Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:19 Mar 22, 2005
Jkt 205001
2. Crystal Coast Civic Center, 3500
Arendell Street, Morehead City, NC
28557.
Supporting documents including the
environmental assessment, initial
Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis, and
regulatory impact review are available
by sending your request to Dianne
Stephan, Highly Migratory Species
Management Division, Office of
Sustainable Fisheries (F/SF1), NMFS,
One Blackburn Dr., Gloucester, MA
01930; fax: 978–281–9340.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dianne Stephan at (978) 281–9260.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Atlantic
tunas are managed under the dual
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act
and ATCA. ATCA authorizes the
Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to
promulgate regulations, as may be
necessary and appropriate, to
implement ICCAT recommendations.
The authority to issue regulations under
the Magnuson-Stevens Act and ATCA
has been delegated from the Secretary to
the Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA (AA).
Background
On May 28, 1998, NMFS published in
the Federal Register (64 FR 29090) final
regulations, effective July 1, 1999,
implementing the Fishery Management
Plan for Atlantic Tunas, Swordfish, and
Sharks (1999 FMP).
In November 2002, ICCAT
recommended a Total Allowable Catch
(TAC) of BFT for the United States in
the western Atlantic management area
of 1,489.6 metric tons (mt), effective
beginning in 2003 and continuing in
subsequent fishing years until revised
by ICCAT. Also in the 2002
recommendation, ICCAT allocated 25
mt annually to account for incidental
catch of BFT by pelagic longline
fisheries directed on other species ‘‘in
the vicinity of the management
boundary area.’’ This area was defined
in the 2003 BFT annual specification
rulemaking process as the Northeast
Distant statistical area (NED) (68 FR
56783, October 2, 2003). The TAC of
1,489.6 mt is inclusive of the annual 25
mt pelagic longline set-aside in the
NED. The initial specifications within
this proposed rule are published in
accordance with the 1999 FMP and are
necessary to implement the 2002 ICCAT
quota recommendation, as required by
ATCA, and to achieve domestic
management objectives under the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
This proposed rule would: (1)
establish initial quota specifications
consistent with the BFT rebuilding
program as set forth in the 1999 FMP by
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
allocating the 2002 ICCATrecommended quota for the 2005 fishing
year (June 1, 2005—May 31, 2006); and
(2) establish the General category effort
controls, including time-period
subquotas and restricted fishing days
(RFDs), for the 2005 fishing season.
NMFS is also seeking public comment
on options for achieving ICCAT’s
recommended four-year average 8
percent tolerance on harvest of school
BFT. As a method for limiting fishing
mortality on school size BFT, ICCAT
adopted an annual 8 percent tolerance
limit in 1991, and in the 1998
rebuilding plan modified the tolerance
to be calculated as a four-year average.
The 2005 fishing year is the third year
in the current four year period.
Landings of school BFT in 2003 were
approximately 138 mt, which is
approximately 9.3 percent of the base
quota for that year, and preliminary
figures for 2004 indicate that school
landings were greater than 2003 school
landings. Since landings of school BFT
for the first half of the four year period
have exceeded 8 percent, landings for
the second half must be less than 8
percent to achieve an overall average of
8 percent or below. NMFS is
considering options other than
providing the full school subquota for
the 2005 fishery, and requests public
comment on potential options for
achieving the 8 percent target, including
the following: (1) defer any action until
the final year of the four year period
(2006); (2) reallocate all or a portion of
the 2005 school subquota to the large
school/small medium subquota for
2005; (3) maintain the default Angling
category retention limit of one fish (in
any recreational size class, i.e., school,
large school/small medium) per vessel
per day for the entire 2005 season; or (4)
prohibit landing of school BFT in 2005
and carry over the subquota to 2006.
After consideration of public
comment, NMFS will issue final initial
quota specifications and effort controls
and publish them in the Federal
Register, along with NMFS’ response to
those comments. The specifications and
effort controls may subsequently be
adjusted during the course of the fishing
year, consistent with the provisions of
the 1999 FMP, and will be published in
the Federal Register.
NMFS acknowledges that a number of
other issues regarding the domestic
management of BFT have been
discussed during recent years. For
instance, adjustment of domestic quota
allocation percentages and General
category time-period subquotas were
raised as issues in a Petition for
Rulemaking submitted by the North
Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 23, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14629-14630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5624]
[[Page 14629]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Part 243
[DFARS Case 2003-D024]
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Contract
Modifications
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to update text pertaining to contract
modifications. This proposed rule is a result of a transformation
initiative undertaken by DoD to dramatically change the purpose and
content of the DFARS.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before May 23, 2005, to be considered in
the formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by DFARS Case 2003-D024,
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Defense Acquisition Regulations Web site: https://
emissary.acq.osd.mil/dar/dfars.nsf/pubcomm. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include DFARS Case 2003-D024 in the
subject line of the message.
Fax: (703) 602-0350.
Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, Attn: Ms.
Michele Peterson, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Defense Acquisition Regulations
Council, Crystal Square 4, Suite 200A, 241 18th Street, Arlington, VA
22202-3402.
All comments received will be posted to https://
emissary.acq.osd.mil/dar/dfars.nsf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Michele Peterson, (703) 602-0311.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
DFARS Transformation is a major DoD initiative to dramatically
change the purpose and content of the DFARS. The objective is to
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the acquisition process,
while allowing the acquisition workforce the flexibility to innovate.
The transformed DFARS will contain only requirements of law, DoD-wide
policies, delegations of FAR authorities, deviations from FAR
requirements, and policies/procedures that have a significant effect
beyond the internal operating procedures of DoD or a significant cost
or administrative impact on contractors or offerors. Additional
information on the DFARS Transformation initiative is available at
https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dfars/transf.htm.
This proposed rule is a result of the DFARS Transformation
initiative. The proposed changes--
Delete unnecessary text at DFARS 243.102, 243.105(a)(ii),
243.107, and 243.204-71.
Delete obsolete text at DFARS 243.105(a)(i).
Update text at DFARS 243.107-70 for consistency with the
requirements of the clause at DFARS 252.249-7002, Notification of
Anticipated Contract Termination or Reduction.
Clarify procedures at DFARS 243.204-70 for determining if
a request for equitable contract adjustment meets the dollar threshold
for requiring contractor certification.
Delete text at DFARS 243.170, 243.171, and 243.204
containing procedures for identification of foreign military sales
requirements, for obligation or deobligation of contract funds, and for
review and definitization of contract change orders. This text will be
relocated to the new DFARS companion resource, Procedures, Guidance,
and Information (PGI), available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/
pgi.
This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review
under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this rule to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the rule
makes no significant change to DoD contracting policy. Therefore, DoD
has not performed an initial regulatory flexibility analysis. DoD
invites comments from small businesses and other interested parties.
DoD also will consider comments from small entities concerning the
affected DFARS subparts in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such comments
should be submitted separately and should cite DFARS Case 2003-D024.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does
not impose any information collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501,
et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 243
Government procurement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48 CFR part 243 as follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 243 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.
PART 243--CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS
243.102, 243.105, and 243.107 [Removed]
2. Sections 243.102, 243.105, and 243.107 are removed.
3. Section 243.107-70 is amended by revising the second sentence to
read as follows:
243.107-70 Notification of substantial impact on employment.
* * * The clause prescribed at 249.7003(c) requires that the
contractor notify its employees, its subcontractors, and State and
local officials when a contract modification will have a substantial
impact on employment.
4. Sections 243.170 and 243.171 are revised to read as follows:
243.170 Identification of foreign military sale (FMS) requirements.
Follow the procedures at PGI 243.170 for identifying contract
modifications that add FMS requirements.
243.171 Obligation or deobligation of funds.
Follow the procedures at PGI 243.171 when obligating or
deobligating funds.
5. Section 243.204 is revised to read as follows:
243.204 Administration.
Follow the procedures at PGI 243.204 for review and definitization
of change orders.
6. Section 243.204-70 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read
as follows:
243.204-70 Certification of requests for equitable adjustment.
* * * * *
(b) To determine if the dollar threshold for requiring
certification is met, add together the absolute value of each cost
increase and each cost decrease. See PGI 243.204-70(b) for an example.
* * * * *
[[Page 14630]]
243.204-71 [Removed]
7. Section 243.204-71 is removed.
[FR Doc. 05-5624 Filed 3-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P