Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Fisheries, 13406-13410 [05-5543]
Download as PDF
13406
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
in Florida as a consequence of the
proposed 2005 quota compared to 2003
landings in that state.
Alternative 3 represents a 9 percent
decrease in the total allowable
commercial landings for bluefish in
2005 versus 2004. The 2004 recreational
harvest limit under this alternative
would be 34 percent higher than the
estimated recreational landings in 2003.
Under this scenario, a total of 61 vessels
would incur revenue losses of from 5 to
39 percent due to the reduction in the
commercial quota. An additional 244
commercial vessels would incur
revenue losses of less than 5 percent of
their total ex-vessel revenue. The same
conclusions as were drawn under
Alternative 2 for fishermen that land
bluefish in North Carolina and Florida
can be applied to this alternative. Table
2 (below) contains a summary of the
allocations to the recreational and
commercial fisheries under the three
alternatives.
TABLE 2.—COMPARISON (IN LBS) OF THE ALTERNATIVES OF QUOTA COMBINATIONS REVIEWED
2005 Initial
TAL
2005 Initial
commercial
quota
2005 Research setaside
2005 Adjusted commercial
quota
2005 Adjusted recreational
harvest limit
20,353,578
297,750
10,398,671
20,157,157
25,608,470
297,750
5,194,491
25,361,337
21,270,578
297,750
9,490,520
21,065,308
2005 Initial
recreational
harvest limit
Quota Alternative 1 (Status Quo/No Action)
Council Preferred Alternative ...........................................
30,853,578
10,500,000
Quota Alternative 2
Projection Based Alternative ............................................
30,853,578
5,245,108
Quota Alternative 3
Based on 1995 to 2000 Commercial TAL .......................
The Council further analyzed the
impacts on revenues of the proposed
RSA specified in all three alternatives.
The social and economic impacts of this
proposed RSA are expected to be
minimal. Assuming the full RSA is
allocated for bluefish, the set-aside
amount could be worth as much as
$86,348 dockside, based on an average
2003 ex-vessel price of $0.29 per pound
for bluefish. Assuming an equal
reduction among all 853 active dealer
reported vessels, this could mean a
reduction of about $101 per individual
vessel. Changes in the recreational
harvest limit would be insignificant
(less than a 1 percent decrease), if 1
percent of the TAL is used for research.
It is unlikely that there would be
negative economic impacts as a result of
the RSA. A full analysis is available
from the Council (see ADDRESSES).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: March 15, 2005.
Rebecca Lent,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–5541 Filed 3–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:51 Mar 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
30,853,578
9,583,000
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 041221358–5065–02; I.D.
121504A]
RIN 0648–AR56
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and
Butterfish Fisheries
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule, 2005 initial
specifications.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces final
specifications for the 2005 fishing year
for the Atlantic mackerel, squid, and
butterfish (MSB) fisheries. This action
also implements a 3.0–inch (7.62–cm)
minimum codend mesh size
requirement for butterfish otter trawl
trips greater than 5,000 lb (2,268 kg). In
addition, this action includes three
regulatory language changes that reflect
previously approved measures in the
FMP. The intent of this final rule is to
promote the development and
conservation of the MSB resource.
DATES: Effective April 20, 2005, through
December 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting
documents used by the Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council (Council),
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
including the Environmental
Assessment (EA) and Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR)/Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), are
available from: Patricia A. Kurkul,
Regional Administrator, Northeast
Regional Office, NMFS, One Blackburn
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930–2298. The
EA/RIR/IRFA is accessible via the
Internet at http:/www.nero.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
Jay Dolin, Fishery Policy Analyst, 978–
281–9259, fax 978–281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Proposed 2005 initial specifications
were published on January 10, 2005 (70
FR 1686). Public comments were
accepted through February 9, 2005. The
final specifications are unchanged from
those that were proposed. A complete
discussion of the development of the
specifications appears in the preamble
to the proposed rule and is not repeated
here.
2005 Final Initial Specifications
The following table contains the final
initial specifications and research set
aside (RSA) for the 2005 MSB fisheries.
For 2005, two project proposals
requesting Loligo squid set-aside
landings were recommended for
approval and will be forwarded to the
NOAA Grants Office for award, for a
total RSA of 255.1 mt. Consistent with
the recommendations, the quotas in this
final rule have been adjusted to reflect
the projects recommended for approval.
If the awards are not made by the NOAA
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Grants Office for any reason, NMFS will
give notice of an adjustment to the
13407
annual quota to return the unawarded
set-aside amount to the fishery.
TABLE 1. FINAL INITIAL ANNUAL SPECIFICATIONS, IN METRIC TONS (MT), FOR ATLANTIC MACKEREL, SQUID, AND
BUTTERFISH FOR THE FISHING YEAR JANUARY 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2005.
Specifications
Loligo
Illex
Mackerel
Butterfish
N/A1
Max OY
26,000
24,000
12,175
ABC
17,000
24,000
335,000
4,545
IOY
16,744.94
24,000
115,0002
1,681
DAH
16,744.9
24,000
115,0003
1,681
DAP
16,744.9
24,000
100,000
1,681
JVP
0
0
0
0
TALFF
0
0
0
0
1Not applicable.
2IOY may be increased during the year, but the total ABC will not exceed 335,000 mt.
3Includes 15,000 mt of Atlantic mackerel recreational allocation.
4Excludes 255.1 mt for Research Set-Aside.
OY is optimum yield; ABC is allowable biological catch; IOY is initial optimum yield; DAH is domestic annual harvest; DAP is domestic annual
processing; JVP is joint venture processing; and TALFF is total allowable level of foreign fishing.
NMFS also implements three
clarifications to the Atlantic mackerel,
squid, and butterfish regulations. The
first, in § 648.21, removes references to
the dates on which the proposed and
final rules for the annual specifications
must be published by the Administrator,
Northeast Region, NMFS (Regional
Administrator), because it is not
necessary to specify these dates in
regulatory text. The second clarification,
in § 648.23, revises a confusing sentence
to make it clearer. The third
clarification, in § 648.4(a)(5)(i), clarifies
that the Illex permit moratorium is in
effect until July 1, 2009.
2005 Final Specifications
Atlantic Mackerel
The final rule specifies an Atlantic
mackerel IOY of 115,000 mt, as well as
a DAH of 115,000 mt (which includes
15,000 mt for the recreational fishery),
a JVP of zero, and a TALFF of zero.
Loligo Squid
In 2004, the Council specified the
annual quota and other measures for
Loligo squid for a period of up to 3 years
(i.e., 2004 - 2007). After a review of
available information, the Council
recommended no change to the Loligo
quota or other measures in 2005, and
NMFS concurs with this
recommendation. Based on research
projects approved for 2005, the Council
recommended that the RSA for
scientific research for Loligo squid not
exceed 255.1 mt. This final rule
specifies a 2005 Max OY for Loligo
squid of 26,000 mt, an ABC of 17,000
mt, and an IOY is 16,744.9, which takes
into account the 255.1–mt RSA. The
2005 quarterly allocations for Loligo are
as follows:
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:51 Mar 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
TABLE 2. Loligo SQUID QUARTERLY
ALLOCATIONS
Quarter
Percent
Metric
Tons1
Research
Set-aside
I (Jan-Mar)
33.23
5,564.3
N/A
II (Apr-Jun)
17.61
2,948.8
N/A
III (Jul-Sep)
17.3
2,896.9
N/A
IV (Oct-Dec)
31.86
5,334.9
N/A
Total
100 16,744.9
255.1
1Quarterly allocations after 255.1–mt RSA
deduction.
Also unchanged from 2004, the 2005
directed fishery will be closed in
Quarters I-III when 80 percent of the
periods’ allocation are harvested, with
vessels restricted to a 2,500–lb (1,134–
kg) Loligo squid trip limit per single
calender day until the end of the
respective quarter. The directed fishery
will close when 95 percent of the total
annual DAH has been harvested, with
vessels restricted to a 2,500–lb (1,134–
kg) Loligo squid trip limit per single
calender day for the remainder of the
year. Quota overages from Quarter I will
be deducted from the allocation in
Quarter III, and any overages from
Quarter II will be deducted from Quarter
IV. By default, quarterly underages from
Quarters II and III will carry over into
Quarter IV, because Quarter IV does not
close until 95 percent of the total annual
quota has been harvested. Additionally,
if the Quarter I landings for Loligo squid
are less than 80 percent of the Quarter
I allocation, the underage below 80
percent will be applied to Quarter III.
Illex Squid
This final rule specifies that Max OY,
IOY, ABC and DAH will be 24,000 mt,
which maintains the status quo. The
Illex directed fishery will be closed
when 95 percent of the quota (22,800
mt) is harvested. The catch limit for
squid/butterfish incidental catch permit
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
holders will be 10,000 lb (4,536 kg).
This also represents the trip limit in
effect when the directed fishery is
closed.
Butterfish
This final rule specifies that the IOY
will be 1,681 mt, which will achieve the
target fishing mortality rate (75 percent
of Fmsy) specified in the FMP based on
the most recent stock assessment for the
species (Stock Assessment Review
Committee (SARC) 38). This final rule
also implements a 3.0–inch (7.62–cm)
minimum codend mesh size
requirement for butterfish otter trawl
trips greater than 5,000 lb (2,268 kg), the
level that would qualify as a directed
butterfish trip.
Comments and Responses
Comment 1: Five comments from
industry members and associations and
one comment from the Council
supported the proposed specifications
for an IOY/DAH of 115,000 mt, though
they believed the industry could
potentially harvest the 165,000 mt
recommended by the Council. All six
commenters raised the same concern
about the timeliness of an in-season
adjustment for the mackerel OY and
DAH, should one become necessary.
They requested that the final 2005
specifications include a clear and
specific contingency provision that
would enable NMFS to implement a
timely in-season adjustment. They
suggested that NMFS use vessel trip
report data and dealer reports, in
conjunction with catch-trend analysis
from previous years, to track mackerel
harvest with a minimum amount of lag
time. They also suggested that NMFS
initiate the in-season adjustment
process when a trigger amount of
mackerel is caught; for example, when
the 2005 projected catch is equal to the
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
13408
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
previous year’s catch (roughly 54,000
mt) or some reasonable percentage (e.g.,
70 percent of the IOY) of the total
available DAH of 100,000 mt.
Response 1: NMFS agrees that it is
important to keep close watch on the
mackerel catch throughout 2005 so that,
should an in-season adjustment become
necessary, it can be implemented as
quickly as possible. NMFS will take
advantage of all data sources and
projection techniques to ensure that it
can achieve that goal. NMFS sees no
need to specify the contingency
provision that the commenters
requested, e.g., a pre-established trigger
for increasing OY and DAH. NMFS will
closely monitor landings in order to take
any necessary action on an in-season
adjustment as noted in the proposed
rule.
Comment 2: One private citizen stated
that all quotas should be cut by 50
percent this year and by 10 percent each
succeeding year. The commenter added
that the maximum sustainable yield
(MSY) estimates are too high, but
provided no justification for these
claims.
Response 2: The quotas, as well as the
MSY calculations that form the basis of
this final rule, are all based on the best
available science, as required by
National Standard 2 of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act.
Classification
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
Included in this final rule is the FRFA
prepared pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 604(a).
The FRFA incorporates the discussion
that follows, the comments and
responses to the proposed rule, and the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IRFA) and other analyses completed in
support of this action. A copy of the
IRFA is available from the Regional
Administrator (see ADDRESSES).
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Statement of Objective and Need
A description of the reasons why this
action is being considered, and the
objectives of and legal basis for this
action, is contained in the preamble to
the proposed rule and is not repeated
here.
Summary of Significant Issues Raised in
Public Comments
Seven sets of comments were
submitted on the proposed rule, but
none were specific to the IRFA or the
economic impacts of the rule.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:51 Mar 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
Description and Estimate of Number of
Small Entities to Which the Rule Will
Apply
The number of potential fishing
vessels in the 2005 fisheries are 381 for
Loligo squid/butterfish, 72 for Illex
squid, 2,407 for Atlantic mackerel, and
2,119 vessels with incidental catch
permits for squid/butterfish, based on
vessel permit issuance. Many vessels
participate in more than one of these
fisheries; therefore, the numbers are not
additive. There are no large entities
participating in this fishery, as defined
in section 601 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA). Therefore, there
are no disproportionate economic
impacts on small entities.
Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
This action does not contain any new
collection-of-information, reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements. It does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules.
Minimizing Significant Economic
Impacts on Small Entities
The annual setting of the
specifications focuses on the allocation
of mackerel, squid, and butterfish to
various groups and for various
purposes. Alternatives that were
considered to lessen the impacts on
small entities are summarized below.
Three alternatives for mackerel were
evaluated. One would have set IOY at
175,000 mt. The two other alternatives
would have set IOY at 165,000 mt.
Neither of these IOYs would constrain
vessels in these fisheries. Absent such a
constraint, no impacts on revenues in
this fishery would be expected as a
result of any of these alternatives. Two
of these alternatives one setting IOY at
165,000 mt and the other setting it at
175,000 mt would have set the ABC at
347,000 mt. These two alternatives were
rejected on biological grounds because
that level of ABC would not be
consistent with the overfishing rule
adopted in Amendment 8 to the Fishery
Management Plan (F=0.25 yield
estimate of 369,000 mt minus the
estimated Canadian catch of 34,000 mt).
Furthermore, the Atlantic mackerel
alternative that would have set IOY at
175,000 mt was rejected because it
would have been too high in light of
social and economic concerns relating
to TALFF. The Atlantic mackerel
alternative that would set IOY at
175,000 mt would also allocate 5,000 mt
for JVP. This allocation of JVP was
rejected because it was concluded that
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
U.S. processing capacity is sufficient to
process the entire DAH. The third
alternative for mackerel considered was
one that would have set IOY at 165,000
mt, and ABC at 335,000 mt. Although
this ABC is the same as in the proposed
action, this IOY was rejected because it
would have been too high in light of
social and economic concerns relating
to TALFF. The specification of TALFF
would have limited the opportunities
for the domestic fishery to expand, and
therefore would have resulted in
negative social and economic impacts to
both U.S. harvesters and processors, as
explained in detail in the proposed rule.
For Illex, one alternative considered
would have set Max OY, ABC, IOY,
DAH, and DAP at a level higher than the
24,000 mt established in this rule-30,000 mt. This alternative would allow
harvest far in excess of recent landings
in this fishery. Therefore, there would
be no constraints and, thus, no revenue
reductions, associated with these
specifications. However, the Council
considered this alternative unacceptable
because an ABC specification of 30,000
mt may not prevent overfishing in years
of moderate to low abundance of Illex
squid.
For butterfish, one alternative
considered would have set IOY at 5,900
mt, while another would have set it at
9,131 mt. These amounts exceed the
landings of this species in recent years.
Therefore, neither alternative would
constrain vessels in this fishery. In the
absence of such a constraint, neither of
these alternatives would reduce
revenues in the fishery. However, both
of these alternatives were rejected
because they would likely result in
overfishing and additional depletion of
the spawning stock biomass.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule, or group
of related rules, for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule
or group of rules. As part of this
rulemaking process, a small entity
compliance guide will be sent to all
holders of permits issued for the
Atlantic mackerel, squid, and butterfish
fisheries. In addition, copies of this final
rule and guide (i.e., permit holder letter)
are available from the Regional
Administrator (see ADDRESSES) and may
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Annual fishing measures. (1) The
Squid, Mackerel, and Butterfish
Committee will review the
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
recommendations of the Monitoring
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and
Committee. Based on these
recordkeeping requirements.
recommendations and any public
comment received thereon, the Squid,
Dated: March 15, 2005
Mackerel, and Butterfish Committee
Rebecca Lent
must recommend to the MAFMC
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
appropriate specifications and any
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
measures necessary to assure that the
Fisheries Service.
specifications will not be exceeded. The
I For the reasons set out above 50 CFR
MAFMC will review these
part 648 is amended as follows:
recommendations and, based on the
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
recommendations and any public
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
comment received thereon, must
recommend to the Regional
I 1. The authority citation for part 648
Administrator appropriate
continues to read as follows:
specifications and any measures
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
necessary to assure that the
I 2. In § 648.4, the introductory heading
specifications will not be exceeded. The
of paragraph (a)(5)(i) is revised to read as MAFMC’s recommendations must
follows:
include supporting documentation, as
appropriate, concerning the
§ 648.4 Vessel permits.
environmental, economic, and social
(a) * * *
impacts of the recommendations. The
(5 )* * *
Regional Administrator will review the
(i) Loligo squid/butterfish and Illex
recommendations and will publish
squid moratorium permits (Illex squid
notification in the Federal Register
moratorium is in effect until July 1,
proposing specifications and any
2009)—
measures necessary to assure that the
*
*
*
*
*
specifications will not be exceeded and
I 3. In § 648.14, paragraphs (a)(74) and
providing a 30-day public comment
(p)(5) are revised and new paragraph
period. If the proposed specifications
(p)(11) is added to read as follows:
differ from those recommended by the
MAFMC, the reasons for any differences
§ 648.14 Prohibitions.
must be clearly stated and the revised
(a) * * *
(74) Possess nets or netting with mesh specifications must satisfy the criteria
set forth in this section. The MAFMC’s
not meeting the minimum size
recommendations will be available for
requirements of § 648.23, and not
inspection at the office of the Regional
stowed in accordance with the
Administrator during the public
requirements of § 648.23, if in
comment period. If the annual
possession of Loligo or butterfish
specifications for squid, mackerel, and
harvested in or from the EEZ.
butterfish are not published in the
*
*
*
*
*
Federal Register prior to the start of the
(p) * * *
fishing year, the previous year’s annual
(5) Fish with or possess nets or
specifications, excluding specifications
netting that do not meet the minimum
of TALFF, will remain in effect. The
mesh requirements for Loligo or
previous year’s specifications will be
butterfish specified in § 648.23(a), or
superceded as of the effective date of the
that are modified, obstructed, or
final rule implementing the current
constricted, if subject to the minimum
year’s annual specifications.
mesh requirements, unless the nets or
netting are stowed in accordance with
(2) The Assistant Administrator will
§ 648.23(b) or the vessel is fishing under make a final determination concerning
an exemption specified in § 648.23(a).
the specifications for each species and
any measures necessary to assure that
*
*
*
*
*
(11) Possess 5,000 lb (2.27 mt) or more the specifications contained in the
of butterfish unless the vessel meets the Federal Register notification will not be
exceeded. After the Assistant
minimum mesh size requirement
Administrator considers all relevant
specified in § 648.23(a)(2).
data and any public comments,
*
*
*
*
*
notification of the final specifications
I 4. In § 648.21, paragraph (d) is revised
and any measures necessary to assure
to read as follows:
that the specifications will not be
§ 648.21 Procedures for determining initial exceeded and responses to the public
annual amounts.
comments will be published in the
Federal Register. If the final
*
*
*
*
*
be found at the following web site:
https://www.nmfs.gov/ro/doc/nero.html.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:51 Mar 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13409
specification amounts differ from those
recommended by the MAFMC, the
reason(s) for the difference(s) must be
clearly stated and the revised
specifications must be consistent with
the criteria set forth in paragraph (b) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
I 5. In § 648.23, paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
§ 648.23
Gear restrictions.
(a) Mesh restrictions and exemptions.
(1) Vessels subject to the mesh
restrictions outlined in this paragraph
(a) may not have available for
immediate use any net, or any piece of
net, with a mesh size smaller than that
required.
(2) Owners or operators of otter trawl
vessels possessing 5,000 lb (2.27 mt) or
more of butterfish harvested in or from
the EEZ may only fish with nets having
a minimum codend mesh of 3 inches
(76 mm) diamond mesh, inside stretch
measure, applied throughout the codend
for at least 100 continuous meshes
forward of the terminus of the net, or for
codends with less than 100 meshes, the
minimum mesh size codend shall be a
minimum of one-third of the net
measured from the terminus of the
codend to the head rope.
(3) Owners or operators of otter trawl
vessels possessing Loligo harvested in or
from the EEZ may only fish with nets
having a minimum mesh size of 1 7/8
inches (48 mm) diamond mesh, inside
stretch measure, applied throughout the
codend for at least 150 continuous
meshes forward of the terminus of the
net, or for codends with less than 150
meshes, the minimum mesh size codend
shall be a minimum of one-third of the
net measured from the terminus of the
codend to the head rope, unless they are
fishing during the months of June, July,
August, and September for Illex seaward
of the following coordinates (copies of
a map depicting this area are available
from the Regional Administrator upon
request):
Point
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
M6
M7
M8
M9
M10
M11
M12
M13
M14
M15
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
N. Lat.
43°58.0′
43°50.0′
43°30.0′
43°20.0′
42°45.0′
42°13.0′
41°00.0′
41°45.0′
42°10.0′
41°18.6′
40°55.5′
40°45.5′
40°37.0′
40°30.0′
40°22.7′
21MRR1
W. Long.
67°22.0′
68°35.0′
69°40.0′
70°00.0′
70°10.0′
69°55.0′
69°00.0′
68°15.0′
67°10.0′
66°24.8′
66°38.0′
68°00.0′
68°00.0′
69°00.0′
69°00.0′
13410
Point
M16
M17
M18
M19
M20
M21
M22
M23
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
N. Lat.
40°18.7′
40°21.0′
39°41.0′
38°47.0′
38°04.0′
37°08.0′
36°00.0′
35°45.0′
15:51 Mar 18, 2005
W. Long.
69°40.0′
71°03.0′
72°32.0′
73°11.0′
74°06.0′
74°46.0′
74°52.0′
74°53.0′
Jkt 205001
(48 mm) diamond mesh or any net, or
any piece of net, with mesh that is
M24
35°28.0′
74°52.0′ rigged in a manner that is prohibited by
paragraph (c) and (d) of this section,
when the vessel is landward of the
Vessels fishing under this exemption
specified coordinates.
may not have available for immediate
*
*
*
*
*
use, as defined in paragraph (b) of this
[FR Doc. 05–5543 Filed 3–18–05; 8:45 am]
section, any net, or any piece of net,
with a mesh size less than 1 7/8 inches
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
PO 00000
Point
Frm 00068
N. Lat.
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
W. Long.
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 53 (Monday, March 21, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13406-13410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5543]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 041221358-5065-02; I.D. 121504A]
RIN 0648-AR56
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Mackerel,
Squid, and Butterfish Fisheries
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule, 2005 initial specifications.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces final specifications for the 2005 fishing year
for the Atlantic mackerel, squid, and butterfish (MSB) fisheries. This
action also implements a 3.0-inch (7.62-cm) minimum codend mesh size
requirement for butterfish otter trawl trips greater than 5,000 lb
(2,268 kg). In addition, this action includes three regulatory language
changes that reflect previously approved measures in the FMP. The
intent of this final rule is to promote the development and
conservation of the MSB resource.
DATES: Effective April 20, 2005, through December 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting documents used by the Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council (Council), including the Environmental
Assessment (EA) and Regulatory Impact Review (RIR)/Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), are available from: Patricia A. Kurkul,
Regional Administrator, Northeast Regional Office, NMFS, One Blackburn
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2298. The EA/RIR/IRFA is accessible via the
Internet at http:/www.nero.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Jay Dolin, Fishery Policy
Analyst, 978-281-9259, fax 978-281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Proposed 2005 initial specifications were published on January 10,
2005 (70 FR 1686). Public comments were accepted through February 9,
2005. The final specifications are unchanged from those that were
proposed. A complete discussion of the development of the
specifications appears in the preamble to the proposed rule and is not
repeated here.
2005 Final Initial Specifications
The following table contains the final initial specifications and
research set aside (RSA) for the 2005 MSB fisheries. For 2005, two
project proposals requesting Loligo squid set-aside landings were
recommended for approval and will be forwarded to the NOAA Grants
Office for award, for a total RSA of 255.1 mt. Consistent with the
recommendations, the quotas in this final rule have been adjusted to
reflect the projects recommended for approval. If the awards are not
made by the NOAA
[[Page 13407]]
Grants Office for any reason, NMFS will give notice of an adjustment to
the annual quota to return the unawarded set-aside amount to the
fishery.
Table 1. Final Initial Annual Specifications, in Metric Tons (mt), for
Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish for the Fishing Year January 1
through December 31, 2005.
Specifications Loligo Illex Mackerel Butterfish
Max OY 26,000 24,000 N/A\1\ 12,175
ABC 17,000 24,000 335,000 4,545
IOY 16,744.9\ 24,000 115,000\ 1,681
4\ 2\
DAH 16,744.9 24,000 115,000\ 1,681
3\
DAP 16,744.9 24,000 100,000 1,681
JVP 0 0 0 0
TALFF 0 0 0 0
\1\Not applicable.
\2\IOY may be increased during the year, but the total ABC will not
exceed 335,000 mt.
\3\Includes 15,000 mt of Atlantic mackerel recreational allocation.
\4\Excludes 255.1 mt for Research Set-Aside.
OY is optimum yield; ABC is allowable biological catch; IOY is initial
optimum yield; DAH is domestic annual harvest; DAP is domestic annual
processing; JVP is joint venture processing; and TALFF is total
allowable level of foreign fishing.
NMFS also implements three clarifications to the Atlantic mackerel,
squid, and butterfish regulations. The first, in Sec. 648.21, removes
references to the dates on which the proposed and final rules for the
annual specifications must be published by the Administrator, Northeast
Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator), because it is not necessary to
specify these dates in regulatory text. The second clarification, in
Sec. 648.23, revises a confusing sentence to make it clearer. The
third clarification, in Sec. 648.4(a)(5)(i), clarifies that the Illex
permit moratorium is in effect until July 1, 2009.
2005 Final Specifications
Atlantic Mackerel
The final rule specifies an Atlantic mackerel IOY of 115,000 mt, as
well as a DAH of 115,000 mt (which includes 15,000 mt for the
recreational fishery), a JVP of zero, and a TALFF of zero.
Loligo Squid
In 2004, the Council specified the annual quota and other measures
for Loligo squid for a period of up to 3 years (i.e., 2004 - 2007).
After a review of available information, the Council recommended no
change to the Loligo quota or other measures in 2005, and NMFS concurs
with this recommendation. Based on research projects approved for 2005,
the Council recommended that the RSA for scientific research for Loligo
squid not exceed 255.1 mt. This final rule specifies a 2005 Max OY for
Loligo squid of 26,000 mt, an ABC of 17,000 mt, and an IOY is 16,744.9,
which takes into account the 255.1-mt RSA. The 2005 quarterly
allocations for Loligo are as follows:
Table 2. Loligo Squid Quarterly Allocations
Metric Research Set-
Quarter Percent Tons\1\ aside
I (Jan-Mar) 33.23 5,564.3 N/A
II (Apr-Jun) 17.61 2,948.8 N/A
III (Jul-Sep) 17.3 2,896.9 N/A
IV (Oct-Dec) 31.86 5,334.9 N/A
Total 100 16,744.9 255.1
\1\Quarterly allocations after 255.1-mt RSA deduction.
Also unchanged from 2004, the 2005 directed fishery will be closed
in Quarters I-III when 80 percent of the periods' allocation are
harvested, with vessels restricted to a 2,500-lb (1,134-kg) Loligo
squid trip limit per single calender day until the end of the
respective quarter. The directed fishery will close when 95 percent of
the total annual DAH has been harvested, with vessels restricted to a
2,500-lb (1,134-kg) Loligo squid trip limit per single calender day for
the remainder of the year. Quota overages from Quarter I will be
deducted from the allocation in Quarter III, and any overages from
Quarter II will be deducted from Quarter IV. By default, quarterly
underages from Quarters II and III will carry over into Quarter IV,
because Quarter IV does not close until 95 percent of the total annual
quota has been harvested. Additionally, if the Quarter I landings for
Loligo squid are less than 80 percent of the Quarter I allocation, the
underage below 80 percent will be applied to Quarter III.
Illex Squid
This final rule specifies that Max OY, IOY, ABC and DAH will be
24,000 mt, which maintains the status quo. The Illex directed fishery
will be closed when 95 percent of the quota (22,800 mt) is harvested.
The catch limit for squid/butterfish incidental catch permit holders
will be 10,000 lb (4,536 kg). This also represents the trip limit in
effect when the directed fishery is closed.
Butterfish
This final rule specifies that the IOY will be 1,681 mt, which will
achieve the target fishing mortality rate (75 percent of Fmsy)
specified in the FMP based on the most recent stock assessment for the
species (Stock Assessment Review Committee (SARC) 38). This final rule
also implements a 3.0-inch (7.62-cm) minimum codend mesh size
requirement for butterfish otter trawl trips greater than 5,000 lb
(2,268 kg), the level that would qualify as a directed butterfish trip.
Comments and Responses
Comment 1: Five comments from industry members and associations and
one comment from the Council supported the proposed specifications for
an IOY/DAH of 115,000 mt, though they believed the industry could
potentially harvest the 165,000 mt recommended by the Council. All six
commenters raised the same concern about the timeliness of an in-season
adjustment for the mackerel OY and DAH, should one become necessary.
They requested that the final 2005 specifications include a clear and
specific contingency provision that would enable NMFS to implement a
timely in-season adjustment. They suggested that NMFS use vessel trip
report data and dealer reports, in conjunction with catch-trend
analysis from previous years, to track mackerel harvest with a minimum
amount of lag time. They also suggested that NMFS initiate the in-
season adjustment process when a trigger amount of mackerel is caught;
for example, when the 2005 projected catch is equal to the
[[Page 13408]]
previous year's catch (roughly 54,000 mt) or some reasonable percentage
(e.g., 70 percent of the IOY) of the total available DAH of 100,000 mt.
Response 1: NMFS agrees that it is important to keep close watch on
the mackerel catch throughout 2005 so that, should an in-season
adjustment become necessary, it can be implemented as quickly as
possible. NMFS will take advantage of all data sources and projection
techniques to ensure that it can achieve that goal. NMFS sees no need
to specify the contingency provision that the commenters requested,
e.g., a pre-established trigger for increasing OY and DAH. NMFS will
closely monitor landings in order to take any necessary action on an
in-season adjustment as noted in the proposed rule.
Comment 2: One private citizen stated that all quotas should be cut
by 50 percent this year and by 10 percent each succeeding year. The
commenter added that the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) estimates are
too high, but provided no justification for these claims.
Response 2: The quotas, as well as the MSY calculations that form
the basis of this final rule, are all based on the best available
science, as required by National Standard 2 of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
Classification
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Included in this final rule is the FRFA prepared pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 604(a). The FRFA incorporates the discussion that follows, the
comments and responses to the proposed rule, and the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis (IRFA) and other analyses completed in support of
this action. A copy of the IRFA is available from the Regional
Administrator (see ADDRESSES).
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Statement of Objective and Need
A description of the reasons why this action is being considered,
and the objectives of and legal basis for this action, is contained in
the preamble to the proposed rule and is not repeated here.
Summary of Significant Issues Raised in Public Comments
Seven sets of comments were submitted on the proposed rule, but
none were specific to the IRFA or the economic impacts of the rule.
Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities to Which the Rule
Will Apply
The number of potential fishing vessels in the 2005 fisheries are
381 for Loligo squid/butterfish, 72 for Illex squid, 2,407 for Atlantic
mackerel, and 2,119 vessels with incidental catch permits for squid/
butterfish, based on vessel permit issuance. Many vessels participate
in more than one of these fisheries; therefore, the numbers are not
additive. There are no large entities participating in this fishery, as
defined in section 601 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA).
Therefore, there are no disproportionate economic impacts on small
entities.
Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
This action does not contain any new collection-of-information,
reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements. It does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other Federal rules.
Minimizing Significant Economic Impacts on Small Entities
The annual setting of the specifications focuses on the allocation
of mackerel, squid, and butterfish to various groups and for various
purposes. Alternatives that were considered to lessen the impacts on
small entities are summarized below.
Three alternatives for mackerel were evaluated. One would have set
IOY at 175,000 mt. The two other alternatives would have set IOY at
165,000 mt. Neither of these IOYs would constrain vessels in these
fisheries. Absent such a constraint, no impacts on revenues in this
fishery would be expected as a result of any of these alternatives. Two
of these alternatives one setting IOY at 165,000 mt and the other
setting it at 175,000 mt would have set the ABC at 347,000 mt. These
two alternatives were rejected on biological grounds because that level
of ABC would not be consistent with the overfishing rule adopted in
Amendment 8 to the Fishery Management Plan (F=0.25 yield estimate of
369,000 mt minus the estimated Canadian catch of 34,000 mt).
Furthermore, the Atlantic mackerel alternative that would have set IOY
at 175,000 mt was rejected because it would have been too high in light
of social and economic concerns relating to TALFF. The Atlantic
mackerel alternative that would set IOY at 175,000 mt would also
allocate 5,000 mt for JVP. This allocation of JVP was rejected because
it was concluded that U.S. processing capacity is sufficient to process
the entire DAH. The third alternative for mackerel considered was one
that would have set IOY at 165,000 mt, and ABC at 335,000 mt. Although
this ABC is the same as in the proposed action, this IOY was rejected
because it would have been too high in light of social and economic
concerns relating to TALFF. The specification of TALFF would have
limited the opportunities for the domestic fishery to expand, and
therefore would have resulted in negative social and economic impacts
to both U.S. harvesters and processors, as explained in detail in the
proposed rule.
For Illex, one alternative considered would have set Max OY, ABC,
IOY, DAH, and DAP at a level higher than the 24,000 mt established in
this rule--30,000 mt. This alternative would allow harvest far in
excess of recent landings in this fishery. Therefore, there would be no
constraints and, thus, no revenue reductions, associated with these
specifications. However, the Council considered this alternative
unacceptable because an ABC specification of 30,000 mt may not prevent
overfishing in years of moderate to low abundance of Illex squid.
For butterfish, one alternative considered would have set IOY at
5,900 mt, while another would have set it at 9,131 mt. These amounts
exceed the landings of this species in recent years. Therefore, neither
alternative would constrain vessels in this fishery. In the absence of
such a constraint, neither of these alternatives would reduce revenues
in the fishery. However, both of these alternatives were rejected
because they would likely result in overfishing and additional
depletion of the spawning stock biomass.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule, or group of related rules, for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rulemaking process, a small entity compliance guide will be sent
to all holders of permits issued for the Atlantic mackerel, squid, and
butterfish fisheries. In addition, copies of this final rule and guide
(i.e., permit holder letter) are available from the Regional
Administrator (see ADDRESSES) and may
[[Page 13409]]
be found at the following web site: https://www.nmfs.gov/ro/doc/
nero.html.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 15, 2005
Rebecca Lent
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
0
For the reasons set out above 50 CFR part 648 is amended as follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 648.4, the introductory heading of paragraph (a)(5)(i) is
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.4 Vessel permits.
(a) * * *
(5 )* * *
(i) Loligo squid/butterfish and Illex squid moratorium permits
(Illex squid moratorium is in effect until July 1, 2009)--
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 648.14, paragraphs (a)(74) and (p)(5) are revised and new
paragraph (p)(11) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 648.14 Prohibitions.
(a) * * *
(74) Possess nets or netting with mesh not meeting the minimum size
requirements of Sec. 648.23, and not stowed in accordance with the
requirements of Sec. 648.23, if in possession of Loligo or butterfish
harvested in or from the EEZ.
* * * * *
(p) * * *
(5) Fish with or possess nets or netting that do not meet the
minimum mesh requirements for Loligo or butterfish specified in Sec.
648.23(a), or that are modified, obstructed, or constricted, if subject
to the minimum mesh requirements, unless the nets or netting are stowed
in accordance with Sec. 648.23(b) or the vessel is fishing under an
exemption specified in Sec. 648.23(a).
* * * * *
(11) Possess 5,000 lb (2.27 mt) or more of butterfish unless the
vessel meets the minimum mesh size requirement specified in Sec.
648.23(a)(2).
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 648.21, paragraph (d) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.21 Procedures for determining initial annual amounts.
* * * * *
(d) Annual fishing measures. (1) The Squid, Mackerel, and
Butterfish Committee will review the recommendations of the Monitoring
Committee. Based on these recommendations and any public comment
received thereon, the Squid, Mackerel, and Butterfish Committee must
recommend to the MAFMC appropriate specifications and any measures
necessary to assure that the specifications will not be exceeded. The
MAFMC will review these recommendations and, based on the
recommendations and any public comment received thereon, must recommend
to the Regional Administrator appropriate specifications and any
measures necessary to assure that the specifications will not be
exceeded. The MAFMC's recommendations must include supporting
documentation, as appropriate, concerning the environmental, economic,
and social impacts of the recommendations. The Regional Administrator
will review the recommendations and will publish notification in the
Federal Register proposing specifications and any measures necessary to
assure that the specifications will not be exceeded and providing a 30-
day public comment period. If the proposed specifications differ from
those recommended by the MAFMC, the reasons for any differences must be
clearly stated and the revised specifications must satisfy the criteria
set forth in this section. The MAFMC's recommendations will be
available for inspection at the office of the Regional Administrator
during the public comment period. If the annual specifications for
squid, mackerel, and butterfish are not published in the Federal
Register prior to the start of the fishing year, the previous year's
annual specifications, excluding specifications of TALFF, will remain
in effect. The previous year's specifications will be superceded as of
the effective date of the final rule implementing the current year's
annual specifications.
(2) The Assistant Administrator will make a final determination
concerning the specifications for each species and any measures
necessary to assure that the specifications contained in the Federal
Register notification will not be exceeded. After the Assistant
Administrator considers all relevant data and any public comments,
notification of the final specifications and any measures necessary to
assure that the specifications will not be exceeded and responses to
the public comments will be published in the Federal Register. If the
final specification amounts differ from those recommended by the MAFMC,
the reason(s) for the difference(s) must be clearly stated and the
revised specifications must be consistent with the criteria set forth
in paragraph (b) of this section.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 648.23, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 648.23 Gear restrictions.
(a) Mesh restrictions and exemptions. (1) Vessels subject to the
mesh restrictions outlined in this paragraph (a) may not have available
for immediate use any net, or any piece of net, with a mesh size
smaller than that required.
(2) Owners or operators of otter trawl vessels possessing 5,000 lb
(2.27 mt) or more of butterfish harvested in or from the EEZ may only
fish with nets having a minimum codend mesh of 3 inches (76 mm) diamond
mesh, inside stretch measure, applied throughout the codend for at
least 100 continuous meshes forward of the terminus of the net, or for
codends with less than 100 meshes, the minimum mesh size codend shall
be a minimum of one-third of the net measured from the terminus of the
codend to the head rope.
(3) Owners or operators of otter trawl vessels possessing Loligo
harvested in or from the EEZ may only fish with nets having a minimum
mesh size of 1 7/8 inches (48 mm) diamond mesh, inside stretch measure,
applied throughout the codend for at least 150 continuous meshes
forward of the terminus of the net, or for codends with less than 150
meshes, the minimum mesh size codend shall be a minimum of one-third of
the net measured from the terminus of the codend to the head rope,
unless they are fishing during the months of June, July, August, and
September for Illex seaward of the following coordinates (copies of a
map depicting this area are available from the Regional Administrator
upon request):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N. Lat. W. Long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
M1 43[deg]58.0' 67[deg]22.0'
M2 43[deg]50.0' 68[deg]35.0'
M3 43[deg]30.0' 69[deg]40.0'
M4 43[deg]20.0' 70[deg]00.0'
M5 42[deg]45.0' 70[deg]10.0'
M6 42[deg]13.0' 69[deg]55.0'
M7 41[deg]00.0' 69[deg]00.0'
M8 41[deg]45.0' 68[deg]15.0'
M9 42[deg]10.0' 67[deg]10.0'
M10 41[deg]18.6' 66[deg]24.8'
M11 40[deg]55.5' 66[deg]38.0'
M12 40[deg]45.5' 68[deg]00.0'
M13 40[deg]37.0' 68[deg]00.0'
M14 40[deg]30.0' 69[deg]00.0'
M15 40[deg]22.7' 69[deg]00.0'
[[Page 13410]]
M16 40[deg]18.7' 69[deg]40.0'
M17 40[deg]21.0' 71[deg]03.0'
M18 39[deg]41.0' 72[deg]32.0'
M19 38[deg]47.0' 73[deg]11.0'
M20 38[deg]04.0' 74[deg]06.0'
M21 37[deg]08.0' 74[deg]46.0'
M22 36[deg]00.0' 74[deg]52.0'
M23 35[deg]45.0' 74[deg]53.0'
M24 35[deg]28.0' 74[deg]52.0'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vessels fishing under this exemption may not have available for
immediate use, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, any net, or
any piece of net, with a mesh size less than 1 7/8 inches (48 mm)
diamond mesh or any net, or any piece of net, with mesh that is rigged
in a manner that is prohibited by paragraph (c) and (d) of this
section, when the vessel is landward of the specified coordinates.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 05-5543 Filed 3-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S