Central Valley Project Improvement Act, Water Management Plans, 13541-13542 [05-5496]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Notices
Grant ST., High St. and South St., Port
Jefferson, 05000265
or faxed comments should be submitted
by April 5, 2005.
NORTH CAROLINA
Carol D. Shull,
Keeper of the National Register of Historic
Places.
Cleveland County
King Street Overhead Bridge, King St. Bet.
Battleground and Railroad Aves., Kings
Mountain, 05000268
CALIFORNIA
Contra Costa County
Merrill, Charles W., House, 407 Camino
Sobrante, Orinda, 05000251
Person County
Long, James A and Laura Thompson, House,
217 S. Main St., Roxboro, 05000267
IOWA
Delaware County
Kirkpatrick, Robert Round Barn, (Iowa Round
Barns: The Sixty Year Experiment TR),
3342–120th Ave., Coggon, 05000252
Polk County
Universalist Church, 420 4th St.,
Mitchellville, 05000253
Stanly County
Second Street Historic District, Portions of
100 and 200 blks N. Second St. and 100 blk
West North St., Albemarle, 05000266
Yadkin County
Morse and Wade Building, 100 E. Main St.,
East Bend, 05000269
PUERTO RICO
KENTUCKY
Cayey Municipality
Rodriguez Morales, Juana, House, 7 Nunez
Romeu St., Cayey, 05000257
Jefferson County
Schaefer—Meyer Brewing Co., Address
Restricted, Louisville, 05000255
Oldham County
Bradshaw—Duncan House, 8502 Todds Point
Rd., Crestwood, 05000254
MONTANA
Gallatin County
Three Valleys State Bank, 202 Main St.,
Three Forks, 05000256
VIRGINIA
Louisa County
Mineral Historic District, Roughly along
Mineral, Louisa, Lee, Richmond,
Albemarle, Pendleton, Piedmont, Old
Tolersville, S. Cecilia, et al, Mineral,
05000271
WISCONSIN
Sierra County
Fort McRae, Address Restricted, Elephant
Butte, 05000258
Wood County
Marshfield Senior High School, 900 E. Fourth
St., Marshfield, 05000272
A request for REMOVAL has been made for
the following resources:
NEW YORK
NORTH DAKOTA
Albany County
Van derzee, Cornelius and Agnietje, Van
Derzee Rd., Coeymans, 05000259
Grand Forks
Building at 205 DeMers Ave., (Downtown
Grand Forks MRA), 205 DeMers Ave.,
Grand Forks, 82001316
Building at 317 S. 3rd St., (Downtown Grand
Forks MRA), 317 S. 3rd St., Grand Forks,
82001318
House at 1648 Riverside Drive, 1648
Riverside Dr., Grand Forks, 94001074
New Hampshire Apartments, (Downtown
Grand Forks MRA), 105 N. 3rd St., Grand
Forks, 82001332
Viets Hotel, (Downtown Grand Forks MRA),
309–311 3rd St., S, Grand Forks, 82001341
NEW MEXICO
Cayuga County
Ingham, William Smith, House, 3069 W Main
St., Meridian, 05000263
Columbia County
Pulver, William and Victoria, House, 2329
Cty Rd. 8, Snyderville, 05000260
Dutchess County
St. Thomas’ Episcopal Church, Leedsville
Rd., N side, W of NY 41, Amenia Union,
05000261
BILLING CODE 4312–51–P
Greene County
Parsonage, The, 424 Main St., Oak Hill,
05000262
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Nassau County
Saint Mary’s Chapel, Rushmore Ave. bet
Roslyn Ave. and Glen Cove Ave., Carle
Place, 05000270
Bureau of Reclamation
Saratoga County
St. Stephen’s Episcopal Church, 1 Grove St.,
Schuylerville, 05000264
Suffolk County
Port Jefferson Village Historic District,
Roughly along E. Main St., E. Broadway,
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:36 Mar 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
[FR Doc. 05–5447 Filed 3–18–05; 8:45 am]
Central Valley Project Improvement
Act, Water Management Plans
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The following Water
Management Plans are available for
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13541
review: City of Folsom; Plain View
Water District; City of Shasta Lake;
Tulare Irrigation District.
To meet the requirements of the
Central Valley Project Improvement Act
of 1992 (CVPIA) and the Reclamation
Reform Act of 1982, the Bureau of
Reclamation has developed and
published the Criteria for Evaluating
Water Management Plans (Criteria).
Note: For the purpose of this
announcement, Water Management
Plans (Plans) are considered the same as
Water Conservation Plans. The above
districts have developed Plans, which
Reclamation has evaluated and
preliminarily determined to meet the
requirements of these Criteria.
Reclamation is publishing this notice in
order to allow the public to review the
Plans and comment on the preliminary
determinations. Public comment on
Reclamation’s preliminary (i.e., draft)
determination is invited at this time.
DATES: All public comments must be
received by April 20, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to
Leslie Barbre, Bureau of Reclamation,
2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento,
California 95825, or contact at 916–978–
5232 (TDD 978–5608), or e-mail at
lbarbre@mp.usbr.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
be placed on a mailing list for any
subsequent information, please contact
Ms. Barbre at the e-mail address or
telephone number above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are
inviting the public to comment on our
preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of
Plan adequacy. Section 3405(e) of the
CVPIA (Title 34 Public Law 102–575)
requires the Secretary of the Interior to
establish and administer an office on
Central Valley Project water
conservation best management practices
(BMPs) that shall ‘‘* * * develop
criteria for evaluating the adequacy of
all water conservation plans developed
by project contractors, including those
plans required by Section 210 of the
Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.’’ Also,
according to Section 3405(e)(1), these
Criteria must be developed ‘‘* * * with
the purpose of promoting the highest
level of water use efficiency reasonably
achievable by project contractors using
best available cost-effective technology
and best management practices.’’ These
Criteria state that all parties
(Contractors) that contract with
Reclamation for water supplies
(municipal and industrial contracts over
2,000 acre-feet and agricultural
contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres)
must prepare Plans that contain the
following information:
1. Description of the District.
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
13542
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Notices
2. Inventory of Water Resources.
3. BMPs for Agricultural Contractors.
4. BMPs for Urban Contractors.
5. BMP Plan Implementation.
6. BMP Exemption Justification.
Reclamation will evaluate Plans based
on these Criteria. A copy of these Plans
will be available for review at
Reclamation’s Mid-Pacific Regional
Office located in Sacramento, California,
and the local area office.
Our practice is to make comments,
including names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public
review. Individual respondents may
request that Reclamation withhold their
home address from public disclosure,
and we will honor such request to the
extent allowable by law. There also may
be circumstances in which Reclamation
would elect to withhold a respondent’s
identity from public disclosure, as
allowable by law. If you wish us to
withhold your name and/or address,
you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your comments. We will
make all submissions from
organizations, businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses available for
public disclosure in their entirety. If you
wish to review a copy of these Plans,
please contact Ms. Barbre to find the
office nearest you.
Dated: February 28, 2005.
Donna E. Tegelman,
Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific
Region, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 05–5496 Filed 3–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 332–352]
Andean Trade Preference Act: Effect
on the U.S. Economy and on Andean
Drug Crop Eradication
International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of opportunity to submit
comments in connection with the 2004
ATPA report.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective Date: March 11, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joanne Guth (202–205–3264 or
joanne.guth@usitc.gov), Country and
Regional Analysis Division, Office of
Economics, U.S. International Trade
Commission, Washington, DC 20436.
General information concerning the
Commission may be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov).
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:36 Mar 18, 2005
Jkt 205001
Background: Section 206 of the
Andean Trade Preference Act (ATPA)
(19 U.S.C. 3204) requires that the
Commission submit annual reports to
the Congress regarding the economic
impact of the Act on U.S. industries and
consumers and, in conjunction with
other agencies, the effectiveness of the
Act in promoting drug-related crop
eradication and crop substitution efforts
of the beneficiary countries. Section
206(b) of the Act requires that each
report include:
(1) The actual effect of ATPA on the
U.S. economy generally as well as on
specific domestic industries which
produce articles that are like, or directly
competitive with, articles being
imported under the Act;
(2) The probable future effect that
ATPA will have on the U.S. economy
generally and on domestic industries
affected by the Act; and
(3) The estimated effect that ATPA
has had on drug-related crop eradication
and crop substitution efforts of
beneficiary countries.
Notice of institution of the
investigation and the schedule for such
reports under section 206 of ATPA was
published in the Federal Register of
March 10, 1994 (59 FR 11308). The
eleventh report, covering calendar year
2004, is to be submitted by September
30, 2005.
Written Submissions: The
Commission does not plan to hold a
public hearing in connection with the
preparation of this eleventh report.
However, interested persons are invited
to submit written statements concerning
the matters to be addressed in the
report. All written submissions should
be addressed to the Secretary, United
States International Trade Commission,
500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436. To be assured of consideration
by the Commission, written statements
relating to the Commission’s report
should be submitted to the Commission
at the earliest practical date and should
be received no later than the close of
business on June 10, 2005. All written
submissions must conform with the
provisions of section 201.8 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.8). Section 201.8
of the rules requires that a signed
original (or a copy designated as an
original) and fourteen (14) copies of
each document be filed. In the event
that confidential treatment of the
document is requested, at least four (4)
additional copies must be filed, in
which the confidential business
information (CBI) must be deleted (see
the following paragraph for further
information regarding CBI). The
Commission’s rules do not authorize
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
filing submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means, except to
the extent permitted by section 201.8 of
the rules (see Handbook for Electronic
Filing Procedures, ftp://ftp.usitc.gov/
pub/reports/
electronic_filing_handbook.pdf).
Persons with questions regarding
electronic filing should contact the
Secretary (202–205–2000 or
edis@usitc.gov).
Any submissions that contain CBI
must also conform with the
requirements of section 201.6 of the
Commission’s rules (19 CFR 201.6).
Section 201.6 of the rules requires that
the cover of the document and the
individual pages clearly be marked as to
whether they are the ‘‘confidential’’ or
‘‘nonconfidential’’ version, and that the
CBI be clearly identified by means of
brackets. All written submissions,
except for CBI, will be made available
for inspection by interested parties.
The Commission intends to publish
only a public report in this
investigation. Accordingly, any CBI
received by the Commission in this
investigation will not be published in a
manner that would reveal the operations
of the firm supplying the information.
The report will be made available to the
public on the Commission’s Web site.
The public record for this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
Issued: March 15, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–5464 Filed 3–18–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 701–TA–438 (Final)]
Live Swine From Canada
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Termination of investigation.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On March 11, 2005, the
Department of Commerce published
notice in the Federal Register of a
negative final determination of
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 53 (Monday, March 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13541-13542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5496]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Central Valley Project Improvement Act, Water Management Plans
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The following Water Management Plans are available for review:
City of Folsom; Plain View Water District; City of Shasta Lake; Tulare
Irrigation District.
To meet the requirements of the Central Valley Project Improvement
Act of 1992 (CVPIA) and the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982, the Bureau
of Reclamation has developed and published the Criteria for Evaluating
Water Management Plans (Criteria). Note: For the purpose of this
announcement, Water Management Plans (Plans) are considered the same as
Water Conservation Plans. The above districts have developed Plans,
which Reclamation has evaluated and preliminarily determined to meet
the requirements of these Criteria. Reclamation is publishing this
notice in order to allow the public to review the Plans and comment on
the preliminary determinations. Public comment on Reclamation's
preliminary (i.e., draft) determination is invited at this time.
DATES: All public comments must be received by April 20, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to Leslie Barbre, Bureau of
Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, California 95825, or contact
at 916-978-5232 (TDD 978-5608), or e-mail at lbarbre@mp.usbr.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To be placed on a mailing list for any
subsequent information, please contact Ms. Barbre at the e-mail address
or telephone number above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are inviting the public to comment on our
preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of Plan adequacy. Section
3405(e) of the CVPIA (Title 34 Public Law 102-575) requires the
Secretary of the Interior to establish and administer an office on
Central Valley Project water conservation best management practices
(BMPs) that shall ``* * * develop criteria for evaluating the adequacy
of all water conservation plans developed by project contractors,
including those plans required by Section 210 of the Reclamation Reform
Act of 1982.'' Also, according to Section 3405(e)(1), these Criteria
must be developed ``* * * with the purpose of promoting the highest
level of water use efficiency reasonably achievable by project
contractors using best available cost-effective technology and best
management practices.'' These Criteria state that all parties
(Contractors) that contract with Reclamation for water supplies
(municipal and industrial contracts over 2,000 acre-feet and
agricultural contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres) must prepare Plans
that contain the following information:
1. Description of the District.
[[Page 13542]]
2. Inventory of Water Resources.
3. BMPs for Agricultural Contractors.
4. BMPs for Urban Contractors.
5. BMP Plan Implementation.
6. BMP Exemption Justification.
Reclamation will evaluate Plans based on these Criteria. A copy of
these Plans will be available for review at Reclamation's Mid-Pacific
Regional Office located in Sacramento, California, and the local area
office.
Our practice is to make comments, including names and home
addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual
respondents may request that Reclamation withhold their home address
from public disclosure, and we will honor such request to the extent
allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which Reclamation
would elect to withhold a respondent's identity from public disclosure,
as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or
address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your
comments. We will make all submissions from organizations, businesses,
and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or
officials of organizations or businesses available for public
disclosure in their entirety. If you wish to review a copy of these
Plans, please contact Ms. Barbre to find the office nearest you.
Dated: February 28, 2005.
Donna E. Tegelman,
Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 05-5496 Filed 3-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P