Central Valley Project Improvement Act, Water Management Plans, 13541-13542 [05-5496]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Notices Grant ST., High St. and South St., Port Jefferson, 05000265 or faxed comments should be submitted by April 5, 2005. NORTH CAROLINA Carol D. Shull, Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places. Cleveland County King Street Overhead Bridge, King St. Bet. Battleground and Railroad Aves., Kings Mountain, 05000268 CALIFORNIA Contra Costa County Merrill, Charles W., House, 407 Camino Sobrante, Orinda, 05000251 Person County Long, James A and Laura Thompson, House, 217 S. Main St., Roxboro, 05000267 IOWA Delaware County Kirkpatrick, Robert Round Barn, (Iowa Round Barns: The Sixty Year Experiment TR), 3342–120th Ave., Coggon, 05000252 Polk County Universalist Church, 420 4th St., Mitchellville, 05000253 Stanly County Second Street Historic District, Portions of 100 and 200 blks N. Second St. and 100 blk West North St., Albemarle, 05000266 Yadkin County Morse and Wade Building, 100 E. Main St., East Bend, 05000269 PUERTO RICO KENTUCKY Cayey Municipality Rodriguez Morales, Juana, House, 7 Nunez Romeu St., Cayey, 05000257 Jefferson County Schaefer—Meyer Brewing Co., Address Restricted, Louisville, 05000255 Oldham County Bradshaw—Duncan House, 8502 Todds Point Rd., Crestwood, 05000254 MONTANA Gallatin County Three Valleys State Bank, 202 Main St., Three Forks, 05000256 VIRGINIA Louisa County Mineral Historic District, Roughly along Mineral, Louisa, Lee, Richmond, Albemarle, Pendleton, Piedmont, Old Tolersville, S. Cecilia, et al, Mineral, 05000271 WISCONSIN Sierra County Fort McRae, Address Restricted, Elephant Butte, 05000258 Wood County Marshfield Senior High School, 900 E. Fourth St., Marshfield, 05000272 A request for REMOVAL has been made for the following resources: NEW YORK NORTH DAKOTA Albany County Van derzee, Cornelius and Agnietje, Van Derzee Rd., Coeymans, 05000259 Grand Forks Building at 205 DeMers Ave., (Downtown Grand Forks MRA), 205 DeMers Ave., Grand Forks, 82001316 Building at 317 S. 3rd St., (Downtown Grand Forks MRA), 317 S. 3rd St., Grand Forks, 82001318 House at 1648 Riverside Drive, 1648 Riverside Dr., Grand Forks, 94001074 New Hampshire Apartments, (Downtown Grand Forks MRA), 105 N. 3rd St., Grand Forks, 82001332 Viets Hotel, (Downtown Grand Forks MRA), 309–311 3rd St., S, Grand Forks, 82001341 NEW MEXICO Cayuga County Ingham, William Smith, House, 3069 W Main St., Meridian, 05000263 Columbia County Pulver, William and Victoria, House, 2329 Cty Rd. 8, Snyderville, 05000260 Dutchess County St. Thomas’ Episcopal Church, Leedsville Rd., N side, W of NY 41, Amenia Union, 05000261 BILLING CODE 4312–51–P Greene County Parsonage, The, 424 Main St., Oak Hill, 05000262 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Nassau County Saint Mary’s Chapel, Rushmore Ave. bet Roslyn Ave. and Glen Cove Ave., Carle Place, 05000270 Bureau of Reclamation Saratoga County St. Stephen’s Episcopal Church, 1 Grove St., Schuylerville, 05000264 Suffolk County Port Jefferson Village Historic District, Roughly along E. Main St., E. Broadway, VerDate jul<14>2003 18:36 Mar 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 [FR Doc. 05–5447 Filed 3–18–05; 8:45 am] Central Valley Project Improvement Act, Water Management Plans Bureau of Reclamation, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The following Water Management Plans are available for PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 13541 review: City of Folsom; Plain View Water District; City of Shasta Lake; Tulare Irrigation District. To meet the requirements of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act of 1992 (CVPIA) and the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982, the Bureau of Reclamation has developed and published the Criteria for Evaluating Water Management Plans (Criteria). Note: For the purpose of this announcement, Water Management Plans (Plans) are considered the same as Water Conservation Plans. The above districts have developed Plans, which Reclamation has evaluated and preliminarily determined to meet the requirements of these Criteria. Reclamation is publishing this notice in order to allow the public to review the Plans and comment on the preliminary determinations. Public comment on Reclamation’s preliminary (i.e., draft) determination is invited at this time. DATES: All public comments must be received by April 20, 2005. ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to Leslie Barbre, Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, California 95825, or contact at 916–978– 5232 (TDD 978–5608), or e-mail at lbarbre@mp.usbr.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To be placed on a mailing list for any subsequent information, please contact Ms. Barbre at the e-mail address or telephone number above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are inviting the public to comment on our preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of Plan adequacy. Section 3405(e) of the CVPIA (Title 34 Public Law 102–575) requires the Secretary of the Interior to establish and administer an office on Central Valley Project water conservation best management practices (BMPs) that shall ‘‘* * * develop criteria for evaluating the adequacy of all water conservation plans developed by project contractors, including those plans required by Section 210 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.’’ Also, according to Section 3405(e)(1), these Criteria must be developed ‘‘* * * with the purpose of promoting the highest level of water use efficiency reasonably achievable by project contractors using best available cost-effective technology and best management practices.’’ These Criteria state that all parties (Contractors) that contract with Reclamation for water supplies (municipal and industrial contracts over 2,000 acre-feet and agricultural contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres) must prepare Plans that contain the following information: 1. Description of the District. E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1 13542 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 53 / Monday, March 21, 2005 / Notices 2. Inventory of Water Resources. 3. BMPs for Agricultural Contractors. 4. BMPs for Urban Contractors. 5. BMP Plan Implementation. 6. BMP Exemption Justification. Reclamation will evaluate Plans based on these Criteria. A copy of these Plans will be available for review at Reclamation’s Mid-Pacific Regional Office located in Sacramento, California, and the local area office. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual respondents may request that Reclamation withhold their home address from public disclosure, and we will honor such request to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which Reclamation would elect to withhold a respondent’s identity from public disclosure, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comments. We will make all submissions from organizations, businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses available for public disclosure in their entirety. If you wish to review a copy of these Plans, please contact Ms. Barbre to find the office nearest you. Dated: February 28, 2005. Donna E. Tegelman, Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation. [FR Doc. 05–5496 Filed 3–18–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 332–352] Andean Trade Preference Act: Effect on the U.S. Economy and on Andean Drug Crop Eradication International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of opportunity to submit comments in connection with the 2004 ATPA report. AGENCY: DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanne Guth (202–205–3264 or joanne.guth@usitc.gov), Country and Regional Analysis Division, Office of Economics, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC 20436. General information concerning the Commission may be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). VerDate jul<14>2003 18:36 Mar 18, 2005 Jkt 205001 Background: Section 206 of the Andean Trade Preference Act (ATPA) (19 U.S.C. 3204) requires that the Commission submit annual reports to the Congress regarding the economic impact of the Act on U.S. industries and consumers and, in conjunction with other agencies, the effectiveness of the Act in promoting drug-related crop eradication and crop substitution efforts of the beneficiary countries. Section 206(b) of the Act requires that each report include: (1) The actual effect of ATPA on the U.S. economy generally as well as on specific domestic industries which produce articles that are like, or directly competitive with, articles being imported under the Act; (2) The probable future effect that ATPA will have on the U.S. economy generally and on domestic industries affected by the Act; and (3) The estimated effect that ATPA has had on drug-related crop eradication and crop substitution efforts of beneficiary countries. Notice of institution of the investigation and the schedule for such reports under section 206 of ATPA was published in the Federal Register of March 10, 1994 (59 FR 11308). The eleventh report, covering calendar year 2004, is to be submitted by September 30, 2005. Written Submissions: The Commission does not plan to hold a public hearing in connection with the preparation of this eleventh report. However, interested persons are invited to submit written statements concerning the matters to be addressed in the report. All written submissions should be addressed to the Secretary, United States International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. To be assured of consideration by the Commission, written statements relating to the Commission’s report should be submitted to the Commission at the earliest practical date and should be received no later than the close of business on June 10, 2005. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.8). Section 201.8 of the rules requires that a signed original (or a copy designated as an original) and fourteen (14) copies of each document be filed. In the event that confidential treatment of the document is requested, at least four (4) additional copies must be filed, in which the confidential business information (CBI) must be deleted (see the following paragraph for further information regarding CBI). The Commission’s rules do not authorize PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 filing submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, ftp://ftp.usitc.gov/ pub/reports/ electronic_filing_handbook.pdf). Persons with questions regarding electronic filing should contact the Secretary (202–205–2000 or edis@usitc.gov). Any submissions that contain CBI must also conform with the requirements of section 201.6 of the Commission’s rules (19 CFR 201.6). Section 201.6 of the rules requires that the cover of the document and the individual pages clearly be marked as to whether they are the ‘‘confidential’’ or ‘‘nonconfidential’’ version, and that the CBI be clearly identified by means of brackets. All written submissions, except for CBI, will be made available for inspection by interested parties. The Commission intends to publish only a public report in this investigation. Accordingly, any CBI received by the Commission in this investigation will not be published in a manner that would reveal the operations of the firm supplying the information. The report will be made available to the public on the Commission’s Web site. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. Issued: March 15, 2005. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary. [FR Doc. 05–5464 Filed 3–18–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 701–TA–438 (Final)] Live Swine From Canada United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Termination of investigation. AGENCY: SUMMARY: On March 11, 2005, the Department of Commerce published notice in the Federal Register of a negative final determination of E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 53 (Monday, March 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13541-13542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Central Valley Project Improvement Act, Water Management Plans

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following Water Management Plans are available for review: 
City of Folsom; Plain View Water District; City of Shasta Lake; Tulare 
Irrigation District.
    To meet the requirements of the Central Valley Project Improvement 
Act of 1992 (CVPIA) and the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982, the Bureau 
of Reclamation has developed and published the Criteria for Evaluating 
Water Management Plans (Criteria). Note: For the purpose of this 
announcement, Water Management Plans (Plans) are considered the same as 
Water Conservation Plans. The above districts have developed Plans, 
which Reclamation has evaluated and preliminarily determined to meet 
the requirements of these Criteria. Reclamation is publishing this 
notice in order to allow the public to review the Plans and comment on 
the preliminary determinations. Public comment on Reclamation's 
preliminary (i.e., draft) determination is invited at this time.

DATES: All public comments must be received by April 20, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to Leslie Barbre, Bureau of 
Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, California 95825, or contact 
at 916-978-5232 (TDD 978-5608), or e-mail at lbarbre@mp.usbr.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To be placed on a mailing list for any 
subsequent information, please contact Ms. Barbre at the e-mail address 
or telephone number above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are inviting the public to comment on our 
preliminary (i.e., draft) determination of Plan adequacy. Section 
3405(e) of the CVPIA (Title 34 Public Law 102-575) requires the 
Secretary of the Interior to establish and administer an office on 
Central Valley Project water conservation best management practices 
(BMPs) that shall ``* * * develop criteria for evaluating the adequacy 
of all water conservation plans developed by project contractors, 
including those plans required by Section 210 of the Reclamation Reform 
Act of 1982.'' Also, according to Section 3405(e)(1), these Criteria 
must be developed ``* * * with the purpose of promoting the highest 
level of water use efficiency reasonably achievable by project 
contractors using best available cost-effective technology and best 
management practices.'' These Criteria state that all parties 
(Contractors) that contract with Reclamation for water supplies 
(municipal and industrial contracts over 2,000 acre-feet and 
agricultural contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres) must prepare Plans 
that contain the following information:
    1. Description of the District.

[[Page 13542]]

    2. Inventory of Water Resources.
    3. BMPs for Agricultural Contractors.
    4. BMPs for Urban Contractors.
    5. BMP Plan Implementation.
    6. BMP Exemption Justification.

    Reclamation will evaluate Plans based on these Criteria. A copy of 
these Plans will be available for review at Reclamation's Mid-Pacific 
Regional Office located in Sacramento, California, and the local area 
office.
    Our practice is to make comments, including names and home 
addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual 
respondents may request that Reclamation withhold their home address 
from public disclosure, and we will honor such request to the extent 
allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which Reclamation 
would elect to withhold a respondent's identity from public disclosure, 
as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or 
address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your 
comments. We will make all submissions from organizations, businesses, 
and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or 
officials of organizations or businesses available for public 
disclosure in their entirety. If you wish to review a copy of these 
Plans, please contact Ms. Barbre to find the office nearest you.

    Dated: February 28, 2005.
Donna E. Tegelman,
Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 05-5496 Filed 3-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P