Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Flexible Use of the 896-901 MHz and 935-940 MHz Bands Allotted to the Business and Industrial Land Transportation Pool, and Oppositions, 13143-13151 [05-5406]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 52 / Friday, March 18, 2005 / Proposed Rules
recordkeeping or recordkeeping
requirements. While the modifications
being considered in the Notice could
have an impact on consumer electronics
manufacturers and broadcasters, such
impact would be similarly costly for
both large and small entities. We seek
comment on whether others perceive a
need for more extensive recordkeeping
under specific options for addressing
the issues in the NPRM and, if so,
whether the burden would fall on large
and small entities differently.
E. Steps Taken to Minimize
Significant Impact on Small Entities,
and Significant Alternatives Considered.
The RFA requires an agency to describe
any significant alternatives that it has
considered in reaching its proposed
approach, which may include the
following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.16
The rule changes under consideration
in this proceeding would revise the
schedule for implementation of the
requirement that new television
receivers include the capability for
reception of broadcast DTV signals. We
requested comment on a suggestion for
revising the schedule submitted by
CEA–CERC in their petition for
rulemaking. We also invited interested
parties to submit alternative suggestions
for revising the implementation
schedule.17
F. Federal Rules Which Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict with the
Commission’s Proposals. None.
8. Ordering Clauses. Pursuant to the
authority contained in sections 2(a), 4(i)
& (j), 7, and 303 of the Communications
Act of 1934 as amended, 47 U.S.C.
152(a), 154(i) & (j), 157, and 303, this
Notice of Proposed Rule Making is
adopted.
9. The Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, will send a copy of
this NPRM, including the IRFA, to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration, in accordance
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
16 5
U.S.C. 603.
NPRM, paragraph 8.
17 See
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:20 Mar 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–5402 Filed 3–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 90
[WT Docket No. 05–62; FCC 05–31]
Amendment of the Commission’s
Rules to Provide for Flexible Use of the
896–901 MHz and 935–940 MHz Bands
Allotted to the Business and Industrial
Land Transportation Pool, and
Oppositions
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission proposes amendments of
its rules to facilitate more flexible use of
the 199 channels allocated to the
Business and Industrial Land
Transportation (B/ILT) Pools in the 896–
901/935–940 MHz (900 MHz) bands, by
permitting any use of the B/ILT
channels in the 900 MHz band that is
consistent with the band’s fixed and
mobile allocations. In addition, the
Commission proposes to license the
remaining spectrum using a geographic
area licensing scheme, and to adopt
service rules, including licensing,
technical and operational rules for the
new geographic licensees. Further, the
Commission seeks comment on
competitive bidding rules and
procedures to be used in the event that
mutually exclusive applications are
filed for the 900 MHz proposed
geographic licenses.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
April 18, 2005. Reply comments are due
May 2, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by WT Docket No. 05–62, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: To receive filing instructions
for e-mail comments, commenters
should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov,
and should include the following words
in the body of the message, ‘‘get form
.’’ A sample form
and directions will be sent in reply.
Include the docket number(s) in the
subject line of the message.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13143
• Mail: Appropriate addresses for
submitting comments and reply
comments may be found in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
• People with Disabilities: Contact
the FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
In addition to filing comments with
the Secretary, a copy of any comments
on the Paperwork Reduction Act
information collection requirements
contained herein should be submitted to
Judith B. Herman, Federal
Communications Commission, Room 1–
C804, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20554, or via the Internet to JudithB.Herman@fcc.gov, and to Kristy L.
LaLonde, OMB Desk Officer, Room
10234 NEOB, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503, via the Internet
to Kristy_L. LaLonde@omb.eop.gov, or
via fax at 202–395–5167.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Connelly, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, at (202)
418–0620.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Federal
Communications Commission’s Notice
and Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FCC
05–31, in WT Docket No. 05–62,
adopted February 10, 2005, and released
February 16, 2005. The full text of this
document is available for public
inspection during regular business
hours at the FCC Reference Information
Center, 445 12th St., SW., Room CY–
A257, Washington, DC 20554. The
complete text may be purchased from
the Commission’s duplicating
contractor: Best Copy & Printing, Inc.,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 800–
378–3160, facsimile 202–488–5563, or
via e-mail at www.fcc@bcpiweb.com.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document does not contain
proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, therefore, it does not
contain any proposed information
collection burden ‘‘for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
13144
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 52 / Friday, March 18, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415,
1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. Comments may
be filed using: (1) The Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS), (2) the Federal Government’s
eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing
paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
63 FR 24121 (1998).
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://www.fcc.gov/
cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Filers should follow the instructions
provided on the website for submitting
comments.
• For ECFS filers, if multiple docket
or rulemaking numbers appear in the
caption of this proceeding, filers must
transmit one electronic copy of the
comments for each docket or
rulemaking number referenced in the
caption. In completing the transmittal
screen, filers should include their full
name, U.S. Postal Service mailing
address, and the applicable docket or
rulemaking number. Parties may also
submit an electronic comment by
Internet e-mail. To get filing
instructions, filers should send an email to ecfs@fcc.gov, and include the
following words in the body of the
message, ‘‘get form.’’ A sample form and
directions will be sent in response.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. If more than
one docket or rulemaking number
appears in the caption of this
proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional
docket or rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail
(although we continue to experience
delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service
mail). All filings must be addressed to
the Commission’s Secretary, Office of
the Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• The Commission’s contractor will
receive hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110,
Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours
at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All
hand deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:20 Mar 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail should be
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request materials in accessible
formats (braille, large print, electronic
files, audio format, etc.) by e-mail at
FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–
418–0531 (voice), 202–418–7365 (TTY).
Synopsis of Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
I. Background
1. In 1986, the Commission
established a pool structure for the 900
MHz PLMR spectrum and allocated 2.5
MHz for the Industrial/Land
Transportation Pool (99 channels) and
2.5 MHz for the Business Pool (100
channels) (collectively, the B/ILT
Pools). The B/ILT Pools were
established for use by site-by-site
licensees engaged in commercial
activities, the operation of educational,
philanthropic, or ecclesiastical
institutions, clergy activities, or the
operation of hospitals, clinics, or
medical associations. In addition,
eligibility was also provided for any
corporations furnishing nonprofit radio
communication service to its parent
corporation or subsidiary. Currently,
applications for use of the B/ILT
frequencies are limited to private,
internal use systems.
2. On July 8, 2004, in its 800 MHz
Report and Order, 69 FR 67,823, the
Commission adopted significant
technical and procedural measures
designed to address the problem of
interference to public safety
communications in the 800 MHz band.
As part of its reconfiguration plan at 800
MHz, the Commission consolidated the
B/ILT Pools in the 800 MHz and 900
MHz bands, allowing any eligible B/ILT
licensee to be licensed on the
consolidated channels. The Commission
also provided for additional flexibility
in the 900 MHz band by allowing 900
MHz PLMR licensees to initiate CMRS
operations on their currently authorized
spectrum or to assign their
authorizations to others for CMRS use.
The Commission reasoned that since it
permitted CMRS use of PLMR
frequencies in the 800 MHz land mobile
band, similar rules should apply in the
900 MHz land mobile spectrum, in the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
interest of regulatory symmetry. The
Commission also noted that in order to
provide the ‘‘green space’’ necessary to
effect reconfiguration of the 800 MHz
band, some operations may need to shift
from the 800 MHz to 900 MHz band.
II. Discussion
A. Flexible Use, Regulatory Framework,
and Assignment of Licenses
3. The Commission proposes service
rules for the new 900 MHz channels that
would provide licensees flexible use.
The Commission expects the economic
efficiencies of flexibility to foster, not
deter, technology development and
investment in communications services
and systems. The Commission seeks
comment on its tentative conclusion to
continue to license these bands under
the framework of part 90 of our rules.
B. Band Plan and Size of Geographic
Service Areas
4. The Commission tentatively
concludes that it should license this 900
MHz spectrum using a geographic area
licensing scheme, believing that
geographic area licensing will maximize
flexibility, permit new and innovative
technologies to rapidly develop in these
bands, and allow a licensee substantial
flexibility to respond to market demand,
resulting in significant improvements in
spectrum utilization. Should the
Commission adopt a geographic area
approach for licensing the flexible-use
spectrum, it seeks comment on the
appropriate size of that geographic area.
In particular, the Commission asks
whether it should adopt Major
Economic Areas (MEAs) or Basic
Economic Areas (EAs). The Commission
notes that MEAs may have the effect of
creating opportunities for both existing
licensees and new entrants to meet
customer demands for wide-area
service, increasing spectrum efficiency,
providing better quality service to end
users, and allowing service to reach
potential end users that may otherwise
be without adequate communication
options, while Basic Economic Areas
(EAs) may provide greater opportunities
for small and medium-sized businesses
to successfully compete against larger,
well-financed bidders, and that EAs
may facilitate the ability of incumbents
and other small and medium-sized
operators of smaller systems to
participate in geographic area licensing.
C. Channel Block Size
5. The Commission seeks comment on
its proposal to license the 900 MHz
flexible-use channels in nineteen blocks
of ten contiguous channels each, and
one block of nine contiguous channels.
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 52 / Friday, March 18, 2005 / Proposed Rules
The Commission believes the proposed
configuration can provide operational
flexibility and efficiency by allowing
providers to use new technologies and
compete effectively with other
commercial providers, and avoids the
transaction costs associated with
reaggregation of spectrum, while
promoting the flexibility necessary to
facilitate secondary market uses. The
Commission also asks whether a more
viable option under an EA-based
licensing approach might include nine
blocks of twenty non-contiguous
channels each and one block of nineteen
non-contiguous channels, which would
allow potential bidders to acquire a
larger number of channels, albeit in
smaller geographic areas. Commenters
might also consider the option of
dedicating the upper four channel
blocks (i.e., QQ, RR, SS, TT) to
traditional B/ILT services. The
Commission also asks commenters to
consider whether to permit potential
bidders to bid on licenses comprising
multiple band plans according to the
band plan configuration they prefer and
use the bidders’ collective valuation of
licenses consistent with each band plan
in determining which band plan to
implement. The Commission seeks
comment on its proposal to permit
licensees to aggregate blocks and to
allow both incumbents and new
entrants to bid on the spectrum.
D. Operational Flexibility
6. The Commission seeks comment on
its tentative conclusion that geographic
area licensees in the 900 MHz band
should be permitted to construct
stations at any authorized site and on
any available channel within their
licensing area, and that geographic area
licensees may expand or modify
facilities throughout their service areas
without prior Commission approval, so
long as the systems continue to be in
compliance with the Commission’s
technical and operational rules, protect
incumbents, and are consistent with
international requirements and
approvals.
E. Treatment of Incumbent Systems
7. The Commission proposes that
geographic area licensees afford the
same protection to incumbent B/ILT
systems as is provided to incumbents by
existing 900 MHz SMR MTA licensees,
and tentatively concludes that the
geographic area licensee’s co-channel
obligations cease upon the deletion of a
revoked or terminated co-channel
station authorization from the
Commission’s licensing records.
Although the Commission believes this
interference protection proposal will
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:20 Mar 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
adequately protect incumbent
operations, it asks commenters to
consider whether additional
interference protection requirements are
needed. The Commission notes that
licensees may be faced with the same
interference problems that necessitated
the remedies adopted in the 800 MHz
R&O unless equivalent interference
abatement requirements are established
at 900 MHz. Also, the Commission
proposes to define the existing service
area of an incumbent B/ILT system by
its originally-licensed 40 dBµV/m field
strength contour, and to permit
incumbent licensees to add or modify
transmit sites in their existing service
area, without prior approval or without
post construction notification to the
Commission, so long as their original 40
dBµV/m signal is not expanded.
8.The Commission also seeks
comment on whether to provide an
option for incumbent licensees to return
their licensees through an auction that
includes the new geographic area
overlay licenses for white space as well
as any site-based licenses currently held
by incumbent licensees who may be
willing to exchange or sell their
licenses. In versions of this general form
of auction discussed by the
Commission, existing licensees would
not be required to relinquish their
rights, but they would be likely to do so
if compensation for their license
exceeded the value to them of
continuing with their current use. Such
a mechanism to promote the efficient
transition of incumbent users may be
most useful in situations in which the
anticipated use of the spectrum under
new service rules is incompatible with
the continued existence of incumbents
operating legacy systems in the band.
While the Commission expects that the
overlay licenses it makes available in
this proceeding will be useful for
providing new services regardless of the
existence of site-based B/ILT users, the
availability of incumbent providers’
licenses may encourage a quicker and
smoother transition of the 900 MHz
spectrum to uses consistent with the
more flexible service rules proposed
here.
F. Emission and Field Strength Limits
9. Regarding emissions, the
Commission seeks comment on its
proposal that, on any frequency in a
geographic area licensee’s spectrum
block that is adjacent to a nongeographic area frequency, the power of
any emission shall be attenuated below
the transmitter power (P) by at least 43
plus 10 log10 (P) decibels or 80 decibels,
whichever is the lesser attenuation; the
Commission tentatively concludes that
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13145
this emission mask would adequately
protect licensees in neighboring
spectrum. Regarding field strength
limits, the Commission requests
comment on whether 40 dBµV/m is an
appropriate field strength level for a
geographic area licensee’s operations at
its service area border, and asks
commenters to address whether this
limit furthers the Commission’s goal of
avoiding harmful interference or
whether stricter requirements are
necessary.
G. Performance Requirements and Other
Operating and Technical Rules
10. The Commission proposes to
require new 900 MHz licensees to
submit to the Commission a showing of
substantial service (as opposed to a
population benchmark) in their licensed
area within either five or ten years of
being licensed, believing that this
performance requirement could provide
greater flexibility for parties interested
in entering into spectrum leasing
arrangements involving this spectrum,
as well as for providing service to rural
or sparsely populated areas. The
Commission also seeks comment on
whether it should modify existing
coverage requirements for 900 MHz
SMR services to mirror the proposed
substantial service showing for those
900 MHz licensees permitted flexible
spectrum use; whether to retain or
eliminate loading requirements as they
apply to existing B/ILT authorizations;
and whether the general provisions of
part 90 to the 900 MHz B/ILT ‘‘white
space’’ spectrum is appropriate.
H. Competitive Bidding Procedures
11. The Commission proposes to
conduct the auction for these 900 MHz
channel licenses under the general
competitive bidding rules established in
part 1, subpart Q of the Commission’s
Rules, and substantially consistent with
the bidding procedures that have been
employed in previous Commission
auctions, including rules governing
designated entities, application and
payment procedures, reporting
requirements, collusion issues, and
unjust enrichment. The Commission
also proposes small business bidding
credits to further the statutory goals of
ensuring that small businesses, rural
telephone companies, and businesses
owned by members of minority groups
and women are given the opportunity to
participate in the provision of spectrumbased services. The Commission seeks
comment on its proposal to define a
small business as an entity with average
annual gross revenues for the three
preceding years not to exceed $15
million, and to define a very small
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
13146
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 52 / Friday, March 18, 2005 / Proposed Rules
business as an entity with average
annual gross revenues for the three
preceding years not to exceed $3
million. The Commission seeks
comment on these proposals.
service, and further believes that these
rules and policies will promote
competition, while providing
opportunities for incumbents to
continue to pursue their business plans.
III. Procedural Matters
C. Description and Estimate of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Rules Will Apply
14. The RFA directs agencies to
provide a description of, and where
feasible, an estimate of the number of
small entities that may be affected by
the proposed rules and policies, if
adopted. The RFA generally defines the
term ‘‘small entity’’ as having the same
meaning as the terms ‘‘small business,’’
‘‘small organization,’’ and ‘‘small
governmental jurisdiction.’’ In addition,
the term ‘‘small business’’ has the same
meaning as the term ‘‘small business
concern’’ under the Small Business Act.
A ‘‘small business concern’’ is one
which: (1) Is independently owned and
operated; (2) is not dominant in its field
of operation; and (3) satisfies any
additional criteria established by the
SBA.
15. Small Businesses. Nationwide,
there are a total of 22.4 million small
businesses, according to SBA data.
16. Small Organizations. Nationwide,
there are approximately 1.6 million
small organizations.
17. Small Governmental Jurisdictions.
The term ‘‘small governmental
jurisdiction’’ is defined as ‘‘governments
of cities, towns, townships, villages,
school districts, or special districts, with
a population of less than fifty
thousand.’’ As of 1997, there were
approximately 87,453 governmental
jurisdictions in the United States. This
number includes 39,044 county
governments, municipalities, and
townships, of which 37,546
(approximately 96.2%) have
populations of fewer than 50,000, and of
which 1,498 have populations of 50,000
or more. Thus, we estimate the number
of small governmental jurisdictions
overall to be 84,098 or fewer.
18. The Commission has determined
that 1,040, or more, licenses will be
awarded in the 896–901 MHz and 935–
940 MHz B/ILT MHz bands; the
Commission does not yet know how
many applicants or licensees in these
bands will be small entities. Thus, the
Commission assumes, for purposes of
this IRFA, that all prospective licensees
are small entities as that term is defined
by the SBA or by our proposed small
business definitions for these bands.
The Commission invites comment on
this analysis.
19. Wireless Service Providers. The
SBA has developed a small business
size standard for wireless firms within
A. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis
12. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), the
Commission has prepared an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
of the possible significant economic
impact on small entities of the policies
and rules proposed in the Notice. The
analysis is found in Appendix B of the
NPRM. The Commission requests
written public comment on the analysis.
Comments must be filed by the same
dates as listed in paragraph 70 of the
NPRM, and must have a separate and
distinct heading designating them as
responses to the IRFA. The
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, will send a copy of
the NPRM, including the IRFA, to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
B. Need for, and Objectives of, the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Memorandum Opinion and Order
13. In the NPRM, the Commission
proposes amendments to part 90 of its
rules to facilitate more flexible use of
the 199 channels allocated to the
Business and Industrial Land
Transportation (B/ILT) Pool in the 896–
901/935–940 MHz (900 MHz) bands.
The Commission proposes to permit any
use of the B/ILT channels in the 900
MHz band that is consistent with the
band’s fixed and mobile allocations, and
to license the remaining spectrum or
‘‘white space’’ using a geographic area
licensing scheme and propose
competitive bidding rules to select from
among mutually exclusive applicants.
The Commission also sets forth
proposals for auction procedures for the
remaining 900 MHz spectrum in the B/
ILT category channels. The Commission
believes these proposed rules will serve
its twin goals of providing service to the
public consistently and expeditiously,
and allowing the marketplace to
respond to consumer demands, and
notes that allowing for flexible use of
this spectrum will greatly aid in
facilitating band reconfiguration
occurring at 800 MHz. The Commission
believes that the rules and policies
proposed in the NPRM strike a fair and
equitable balance between the interests
of incumbent B/ILT licensees, and those
seeking to provide geographic area
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:20 Mar 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the two broad economic census
categories of ‘‘Paging’’ and ‘‘Cellular and
Other Wireless Telecommunications.’’
Under both SBA categories, a wireless
business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer
employees. For the census category of
Paging, Census Bureau data for 1997
show that there were 1,320 firms in this
category, total, that operated for the
entire year. Of this total, 1,303 firms had
employment of 999 or fewer employees,
and an additional 17 firms had
employment of 1,000 employees or
more. Thus, under this category and
associated small business size standard,
the great majority of firms can be
considered small. For the census
category Cellular and Other Wireless
Telecommunications, Census Bureau
data for 1997 show that there were 977
firms in this category, total, that
operated for the entire year. Of this
total, 965 firms had employment of 999
or fewer employees, and an additional
12 firms had employment of 1,000
employees or more. Thus, under this
second category and size standard, the
great majority of firms can, again, be
considered small.
20. Wireless Telephony. Wireless
telephony includes cellular, personal
communications services, and
specialized mobile radio telephony
carriers. The SBA has developed a small
business size standard for ‘‘Cellular and
Other Wireless Telecommunications’’
services. Under that SBA small business
size standard, a business is small if it
has 1,500 or fewer employees.
According to Commission data, 447
carriers reported that they were engaged
in the provision of wireless telephony.
We have estimated that 245 of these are
small under the SBA small business size
standard.
21. Broadband Personal
Communications Service. The
broadband personal communications
services (PCS) spectrum is divided into
six frequency blocks designated A
through F, and the Commission has held
auctions for each block. The
Commission has created a small
business size standard for Blocks C and
F as an entity that has average gross
revenues of less than $40 million in the
three previous calendar years. For Block
F, an additional small business size
standard for ‘‘very small business’’ was
added and is defined as an entity that,
together with its affiliates, has average
gross revenues of not more than $15
million for the preceding three calendar
years. These small business size
standards, in the context of broadband
PCS auctions, have been approved by
the SBA. No small businesses within the
SBA-approved small business size
standards bid successfully for licenses
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 52 / Friday, March 18, 2005 / Proposed Rules
in Blocks A and B. There were 90
winning bidders that qualified as small
entities in the Block C auctions. A total
of 93 ‘‘small’’ and ‘‘very small’’ business
bidders won approximately 40 percent
of the 1,479 licenses for Blocks D, E, and
F. On March 23, 1999, the Commission
reauctioned 155 C, D, E, and F Block
licenses; there were 113 small business
winning bidders.
22. On January 26, 2001, the
Commission completed the auction of
422 C and F Broadband PCS licenses in
Auction No. 35. Of the 35 winning
bidders in this auction, 29 qualified as
‘‘small’’ or ‘‘very small’’ businesses.
Subsequent events concerning Auction
35, including judicial and agency
determinations, resulted in a total of 163
C and F Block licenses being available
for grant.
23. Cellular Licensees. The SBA has
developed a small business size
standard for wireless firms within the
broad economic census category
‘‘Cellular and Other Wireless
Telecommunications.’’ Under this SBA
category, a wireless business is small if
it has 1,500 or fewer employees. For the
census category Cellular and Other
Wireless Telecommunications firms,
Census Bureau data for 1997 show that
there were 977 firms in this category,
total, that operated for the entire year.
Of this total, 965 firms had employment
of 999 or fewer employees, and an
additional 12 firms had employment of
1,000 employees or more. Thus, under
this category and size standard, the great
majority of firms can be considered
small. According to Commission data,
447 carriers reported that they were
engaged in the provision of cellular
service, personal communications
service, or specialized mobile radio
telephony services, which are placed
together in the data. We have estimated
that 245 of these are small, under the
SBA small business size standard.
D. Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
24. The NPRM proposes to amend
part 90 of the Commission’s rules to
facilitate more flexible use of the 199
channels allocated to the Business and
Industrial Land Transportation (B/ILT)
Pools in the 896–901/935–940 MHz (900
MHz) bands, to permit any use of the B/
ILT channels in the 900 MHz band that
is consistent with the band’s fixed and
mobile allocations. It also proposes to
license the unencumbered spectrum
through geographic area licensing.
Accordingly, the Commission proposes
service rules, including licensing,
technical and operational rules for the
new geographic licensees, and seeks
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:20 Mar 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
comment on defining the rights of B/ILT
licensees already operating in the 900
MHz band. The Commission also seeks
comment on competitive bidding rules
and procedures to be used in the event
that mutually exclusive applications are
filed for the 900 MHz proposed
geographic licenses.
25. In paragraphs 12–14 of the NPRM,
the Commission proposes service rules
for the new 900 MHz channels that
would provide licensees with the
flexibility to employ this spectrum for
any use permitted by the United States
Table of Frequency Allocations
contained in part 2 of our rules (i.e.,
fixed or mobile services), believing that
such flexibility fully meets criteria set
forth in section 303(y) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended. The NPRM tentatively
concludes that such use would be
consistent with applicable international
agreements, and that the public interest
benefits of flexibility are numerous, and
notes that the Commission has
identified the establishment of
maximum feasible flexibility in both
spectrum designations and allocations
and service rules as a critical means of
ensuring that spectrum is put to its most
beneficial use.
The Commission believes that the
economic efficiencies of flexibility
foster, rather than deter, technology
development and investment in
communications services and systems.
26. In paragraphs 17–19 of the NPRM,
the Commission seeks comment on its
proposal to license this 900 MHz
spectrum using geographic area
licensing, believing that such a licensing
scheme is well-suited for the types of
fixed and mobile services that will
likely develop in this overlay band. The
Commission invites commenters to
explain any opposition and the costs
and benefits associated with any
preferable licensing proposal. In
paragraphs 21–25, the Commission
seeks comment on its proposal to adopt
Major Economic Areas (‘‘MEAs’’), or, in
the alternative, Economic Areas (‘‘EAs’’)
as the appropriate geographic size. On
the one hand, allowing the new 900
MHz licensees the use of frequencies for
systems providing coverage across wide
areas will increase spectrum efficiency,
provide better quality service to end
users, and allow service to reach
potential end users that may otherwise
be without adequate communication
options, and that the MEA-based
licensees will be in a better position to
address the needs of system users,
customers, or lessees that have widearea requirements; on the other hand,
EAs, which are more than three times
the number of delineated economic
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13147
areas than MEAs, may facilitate the
ability of incumbents and other small
and medium-sized operators of smaller
systems to participate in geographic area
licensing. Adopting an EA-based
licensing scheme may permit small
bidders and rural companies wishing
smaller license areas to obtain them
directly at auction rather than facing the
uncertainty and transaction costs of
working out post-auction partitioning
agreements.
27. In paragraphs 26–30 of the NPRM,
the Commission proposes to license the
900 MHz flexible-use channels in
nineteen blocks of ten contiguous
channels each, and one block of nine
contiguous channels, with each tenchannel block separately licensed.
Under the Commission’s proposal,
applicants would be permitted to
aggregate blocks if they wish, without
eligibility restriction for any channel
block. The Commission seeks comment
on whether the proposed 900 MHz
channel block plan strikes a balance in
affording small, medium and large
operators the opportunity to obtain
sufficient spectrum to establish viable
and competitive wide-area systems, and
whether the plan offers a middle ground
between larger channel blocks that may
block entry to new, smaller operators,
and smaller block sizes that may hinder
wide-area operations.
28. In paragraphs 45–51 of the NPRM,
the Commission proposes that the new
900 MHz licensees submit to the
Commission a showing of substantial
service in their licensed area within five
or ten years of being licensed. In making
this proposal, the Commission notes
that a population-based benchmark may
be a considerable obstacle for the
provision of services in rural or sparsely
populated areas, and that populationbased coverage requirements may be
difficult to achieve due to existing band
encumbrances. The Commission also
believes that the ten-year substantial
service requirement provides greater
flexibility for parties interested in
entering into spectrum leasing
arrangements involving this spectrum.
29. In paragraphs 58–63 of the NPRM,
the Commission proposes small
business bidding credits to further the
goals of ensuring that small businesses,
rural telephone companies, and
businesses owned by members of
minority groups and women are given
the opportunity to participate in the
provision of spectrum-based services,
and promoting economic opportunity
and competition by avoiding excessive
concentration of licenses and by
disseminating licenses among a wide
variety of applicants, including small
businesses, rural telephone companies,
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
13148
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 52 / Friday, March 18, 2005 / Proposed Rules
and businesses owned by members of
minority groups and women. To that
end, the Commission proposes a 10
percent bidding credit for small
business and a 15 percent bidding credit
for very small businesses.
30. The Commission requests
comment on how these proposed rules
may be modified to reduce the burden
on small entities and still meet the
objectives of the proceeding.
E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
31. The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant alternatives that
it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance rather than design
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof
for small entities.
32. The NPRM proposes to establish
small business bidding credits to further
the goals of ensuring that small
businesses, rural telephone companies,
and businesses owned by members of
minority groups and women are given
the opportunity to participate in the
provision of spectrum-based services,
with a 10 percent bidding credit for
small business and a 15 percent bidding
credit for very small businesses. In
addition, the NPRM solicits comment on
a number of proposals and alternatives
regarding the service rules for the 900
MHz band, and seeks to adopt rules that
will reduce regulatory burdens, promote
innovate services and encourage flexible
use of this spectrum. The Commission
believes the proposed rules will open
up economic opportunities to a variety
of spectrum users, which could include
small businesses. Because the
Commission seeks to minimize, to the
extent possible, the economic impact on
small businesses, the NPRM sets forth
various proposals and alternatives for
parties to consider.
33. The NPRM invites comment on
various alternative licensing and service
rules and on a number of issues relating
to how the Commission should craft
service rules for this spectrum that
could have an impact on small entities.
The NPRM proposes a geographic area
approach to service areas, as opposed to
a station-defined licensing approach,
and seeks comment on the appropriate
size of service areas. Specifically, the
NPRM asks for comment on whether
smaller geographic areas would better
serve the needs of small entities.
34. The regulatory burdens proposed
in the NPRM appear necessary in order
to ensure that the public receives the
benefits of innovative new services, or
enhanced existing services, in a prompt
and efficient manner. The Commission
will continue to examine alternatives in
the future with the objectives of
eliminating unnecessary regulations and
minimizing any significant economic
impact on small entities. The
Commission invites comment on any
additional significant alternatives
parties believe should be considered
and on how the approach outlined in
the NPRM will impact small entities,
including small businesses and small
government entities.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
IV. Ordering Clauses
35. Pursuant to the authority of
sections 1, 2, 4(i), 7, 10, 201, 214, 301,
302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 319, 324,
332 and 333 of the Communications Act
of 1934, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 157,
160, 201, 214, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308,
309, 310, 319, 324, 332, 333, this Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking is adopted.
§ 90.210
List of Subjects of 47 CFR part 90
Communications common carriers.
§ 90.210
Proposed Rule Changes
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 90 as follows:
PART 90—PRIVATE LAND MOBILE
RADIO SERVICES
1. The authority citation of part 90
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sections 4(i), 11, 303(g), 303(r),
and 332(c)(7) of the Communications Act of
1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161,
303(g), 303(r), 332(c)(7).
2. Amend § 90.7 by adding the
definitions ‘‘Major Economic Area
(MEA)’’ and ‘‘MEA-based license or
MEA license’’ in alphabetical order to
read as follows:
§ 90.7
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Major Economic Area (MEA). An
aggregation of Basic Economic Areas
(BEAs) into 52 regions, including the
Gulf of Mexico.
*
*
*
*
*
MEA-based license or MEA license. A
license authorizing the right to use a
specified block of SMR spectrum with
one of the 52 Major Economic Areas
(‘‘MEAs’’).
*
*
*
*
*
[Amended]
3. Amend § 90.210 as follows:
(a) In the entry for 5850–5925 of the
table ‘‘APPLICABLE EMISSIONS
MASKS’’ redesignate footnote 4 as
footnote 5; and
(b) In the same table amend the entry
for 896–901/935–940 Frequency band
MHz by adding a new footnote 4.
*
Emission masks.
*
*
*
*
APPLICABLE EMISSION MASKS
Mask for equipment with audio
low pass filter
Frequency band (MHz)
*
*
*
*
*
896–901/935–940 4 ............................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
Mask for equipment without
audio low pass
filter
*
I
*
*
4 Equipment
*
J
*
used in this band licensed to MTA, EA or MEA or non geographic based systems shall comply with the emission mask provisions
of § 90.669 of this chapter.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:20 Mar 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 52 / Friday, March 18, 2005 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
*
4. Amend § 90.617 by revising the
section heading, revising paragraph (c)
preceding Table 3, by removing the
undesignated paragraph also preceding
Table 3 (Table 3 remains unchanged), by
revising paragraph (f) preceding Table 6
(Table 6 remains unchanged), and by
adding Table 7 and a Note to Table 7 to
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
§ 90.617 Frequencies in the 809.750–824/
854.750–869 MHz, and 896–901/935–940
MHz bands available for trunked,
conventional, or cellular system use in nonborder areas.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The channels listed in Table 3 are
available to applicants eligible in the
Industrial/Business Pool of subpart C of
this part but exclude Special Mobilized
Radio Systems as defined in § 90.603(c).
These frequencies are available in nonborder areas. Specialized Mobile Radio
(SMR) systems may be authorized on
these frequencies after [Effective date of
Report and Order]. For multi-channel
systems, channels may be grouped
vertically or horizontally as they appear
in the following table.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) The channels listed in Table 6 are
available for operations only to eligibles
13149
in the SMR category—which consists of
Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR)
stations and eligible end users. These
frequencies are available in non-border
areas.
*
*
*
*
*
Note to Table 7: The channels listed in
Table 7 are available to Business/Industrial/
Land Transportation of SMR eligibles for EAbased or MEA-based licensing.
TABLE 7.—896–901/935–940 MHZ BAND CHANNELS (199 CHANNELS) AVAILABLE AFTER [EFFECTIVE DATE OF REPORT
AND ORDER] FOR BUSINESS/INDUSTRIAL/LAND TRANSPORTATION OR SMR ELIGIBLES FOR EA-BASED OR MEA-BASED
LICENSING
Block
Channel Nos.
AA .........................................................................................................................
BB .........................................................................................................................
CC ........................................................................................................................
DD ........................................................................................................................
EE .........................................................................................................................
FF .........................................................................................................................
GG ........................................................................................................................
HH ........................................................................................................................
II ...........................................................................................................................
JJ ..........................................................................................................................
KK .........................................................................................................................
LL .........................................................................................................................
MM ........................................................................................................................
NN ........................................................................................................................
OO ........................................................................................................................
PP .........................................................................................................................
QQ ........................................................................................................................
RR ........................................................................................................................
SS .........................................................................................................................
TT .........................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
5. Amend § 90.619 by revising
paragraph (b)(1) and removing the
undesignated text following paragraph
(b)(1) (Table 1 remains unchanged);
revise paragraph (b)(2) and redesignate
Table 2 in paragraph (b)(2) as Table 2A,
and by adding Table 2B, and a Note to
Table 2B in paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 90.619 Frequencies available for use in
the U.S./Mexico and U.S./Canada border
areas.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The channels listed in Table 1 are
available to applicants eligible in the
11–12–13–14–15–16–17–18–19–20
31–32–33–34–35–36–37–38–39–40
51–52–53–54–55–56–57–58–59–60
71–72–73–74–75–76–77–78–79–80
91–92–93–94–95–96–97–98–99–100
111–112–113–114–115–116–117–118–119–120
131–132–133–134–135–136–137–138–139–140
151–152–153–154–155–156–157–158–159–160
171–172–173–174–175–176–177–178–179–180
191–192–193–194–195–196–197–198–199–200
211–212–213–214–215–216–217–218–219–220
231–232–233–234–235–236–237–238–239–240
251–252–253–254–255–256–257–258–259–260
271–272–273–274–275–276–277–278–279–280
291–292–293–294–295–296–297–298–299–300
311–312–313–314–315–316–317–318–319–320
331–332–333–334–335–336–337–338–339–340
351–352–353–354–355–356–357–358–359–360
371–372–373–374–375–376–377–378–379–380
391–392–393–394–395–396–397–398–399
Industrial/Business Pool of subpart C of
this part but exclude Special Mobilized
Radio Systems as defined in § 90.603(c).
These frequencies are available within
the Mexico border region. Specialized
Mobile Radio (SMR) systems may be
authorized on these frequencies after
[Effective date of Report and Order]. For
multi-channel systems, channels may be
grouped vertically or horizontally as
they appear in the following table.
Channels numbered above 200 may be
used only subject to the power flux
density limits stated in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) The channels listed in Table 2A
below are available for operations only
to eligibles in the SMR category—which
consists of Specialized Mobile Radio
(SMR) stations and eligible end users.
These frequencies are available in the
Mexico border region.
*
*
*
*
*
Note to Table 2B: The channels listed in
Table 2B are available to Business/Industrial/
Land Transportation or SMR eligibles for EA
or MEA based licensing in the Mexico border
region after [Effective date of Report and
Order].
TABLE 2B.—896–901/935–940 MHZ BAND CHANNELS (199 CHANNELS) AVAILABLE AFTER [EFFECTIVE DATE OF REPORT
AND ORDER] FOR BUSINESS/INDUSTRIAL/LAND TRANSPORTATION OR SMR ELIGIBLES FOR EA-BASED OR MEA-BASED
LICENSING IN UNITED STATES-MEXICO BORDER AREA
Block
Channel Nos.
AA .........................................................................................................................
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:20 Mar 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11–12–13–14–15–16–17–18–19–20
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
13150
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 52 / Friday, March 18, 2005 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2B.—896–901/935–940 MHZ BAND CHANNELS (199 CHANNELS) AVAILABLE AFTER [EFFECTIVE DATE OF REPORT
AND ORDER] FOR BUSINESS/INDUSTRIAL/LAND TRANSPORTATION OR SMR ELIGIBLES FOR EA-BASED OR MEA-BASED
LICENSING IN UNITED STATES-MEXICO BORDER AREA—Continued
Block
Channel Nos.
BB .........................................................................................................................
CC ........................................................................................................................
DD ........................................................................................................................
EE .........................................................................................................................
FF .........................................................................................................................
GG ........................................................................................................................
HH ........................................................................................................................
II ...........................................................................................................................
JJ ..........................................................................................................................
KK .........................................................................................................................
LL .........................................................................................................................
MM ........................................................................................................................
NN ........................................................................................................................
OO ........................................................................................................................
PP .........................................................................................................................
QQ ........................................................................................................................
RR ........................................................................................................................
SS .........................................................................................................................
TT .........................................................................................................................
31–32–33–34–35–36–37–38–39–40
51–52–53–54–55–56–57–58–59–60
71–72–73–74–75–76–77–78–79–80
91–92–93–94–95–96–97–98–99–100
111–112–113–114–115–116–117–118–119–120
131–132–133–134–135–136–137–138–139–140
151–152–153–154–155–156–157–158–159–160
171–172–173–174–175–176–177–178–179–180
191–192–193–194–195–196–197–198–199–200
211–212–213–214–215–216–217–218–219–220
231–232–233–234–235–236–237–238–239–240
251–252–253–254–255–256–257–258–259–260
271–272–273–274–275–276–277–278–279–280
291–292–293–294–295–296–297–298–299–300
311–312–313–314–315–316–317–318–319–320
331–332–333–334–335–336–337–338–339–340
351–352–353–354–355–356–357–358–359–360
371–372–373–374–375–376–377–378–379–380
391–392–393–394–395–396–397–398–399
Channels numbered above 200 may only be used subject to the power flux density limits at or beyond the Mexico border as stated in paragraph (4) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
6. Amend § 90.621 by revising
paragraph (b) introductory text to read
as follows:
§ 90.621 Selection and assignment of
frequencies.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Stations authorized on frequencies
listed in this subpart, except for those
stations authorized pursuant to
paragraph (g) of this section and
geographic-area-based systems, will be
assigned frequencies solely on the basis
of fixed distance separation criteria. The
separation between co-channel systems
will be a minimum of 113 km (70 mi)
with one exception. For incumbent
licensees in Channel Blocks G through
V, that have received the consent of all
affected parties or a certified frequency
coordinator to utilize an 18 dBµV/m
signal strength interference contour (see
§ 90.693), the separation between cochannel systems will be a minimum of
173 km (107 mi). The following
exceptions to these separations shall
apply:
*
*
*
*
*
7. Amend § 90.669 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows. The
note following paragraph (a) remains
unchanged.
§ 90.669
Emission limits.
(a) Out-of-band emission
requirements shall apply only to the
‘‘outer’’ channels included in an MTA,
EA, or MEA licensee and to spectrum
adjacent to interior channels used by
incumbent licensees. On any frequency
in a MTA, EA, or MEA geographic-area-
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:20 Mar 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
based licensee’s spectrum block that is
adjacent to another licensee’s frequency,
the power of any emission shall be
attenuated below the transmitter power
(P) by at least 43 plus 10 log10(P)
decibels or 80 decibels, whichever is the
lesser attenuation.
*
*
*
*
*
8. Revise § 90.671 to read as follows:
§ 90.671
Field strength limits.
The predicted or measured field
strength at any location on the border of
the service area for 896–901/935–940
MHz geographic-area-based licensees
shall not exceed 40 dBµV/m unless all
co-channel bordering geographic-areabased licensees agree to a higher field
strength. Geographic-area-based
licensees are also required to coordinate
their frequency usage with co-channel
adjacent geographic-area-based
licensees and all other affected parties.
To the extent that a single entity obtains
licenses for adjacent MTAs, EAs or
MEAs on the same channel block, it will
not be required to coordinate its
operations in this manner. In the event
that this standard conflicts with the
geographic-area-based licensee’s
obligation to provide co-channel
protection to incumbent licensees under
§ 90.621(b), the requirements of
§ 90.621(b) shall prevail.
9. Amend subpart S by adding the
undesignated center heading and
§§ 90.678, 90.679, and 90.680 to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Policies Governing Licensing and Use
of EA-Based or MEA-Based Business/
Industrial/Land Transportation or SMR
Systems in the 896–901/935–940 MHz
Band
§ 90.678 EA-Based or MEA-Based
Business/Industrial/Land Transportation or
SMR service areas.
EA or MEA licenses for spectrum
blocks AA, BB, through TT, in the 896–
940 MHz band listed in table 7 of
§ 90.617(f) are available in 175
Economic Areas (EAs) or 52 Major
Economic Areas (MEAs) as defined in
§ 90.7. Within these EAs or MEAs,
licenses will be authorized in ten
channel blocks as specified in table 7 of
§ 90.617(f) through the competitive
bidding procedures described in subpart
U of this part.
§ 90.679 EA or MEA-based Business/
Industrial/Land Transportation or SMR
system operations.
(a) EA or MEA-based licensees
authorized in the 896–901/935–940
MHz band pursuant to § 90.678 may
construct and operate base stations
using any frequency identified in their
spectrum block anywhere within their
authorized licensed area, provided that:
(1) The EA or MEA licensee complies
with any rules and international
agreements that restrict use of
frequencies identified in their spectrum
block, including the provisions of
§ 90.619 relating to U.S./Canadian and
U.S./Mexican border areas.
(2) The EA or MEA licensee limits its
field strength at any location on the
border of the service area in accordance
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 52 / Friday, March 18, 2005 / Proposed Rules
with § 90.671 and masks its emissions
in accordance with § 90.669.
(b) In the event that the authorization
for a previously authorized co-channel
station within the geographic-area-based
licensee’s authorized spectrum block is
terminated or revoked, the licensee’s cochannel obligations to such station will
cease upon deletion of the facility from
the Commission’s licensing record. The
EA or MEA licensee then will be able
to construct and operate base stations
using such frequency.
§ 90.680 Authorization, construction and
implementation of EA or MEA-based
licenses and Grandfathering provisions for
incumbent licensees.
(a) Geographic-area-based licenses in
the 896–901/935–940 MHz band will be
issued for a term not to exceed ten
years.
(b) Each geographic-area-based
licensee in the 896–901/935–940 MHz
band must demonstrate, through a
showing to the Commission ten years
from the date of license grant, that it is
providing substantial service within its
service area.
(c) Geographic-area-based licensees
who fail to make a convincing showing
of substantial service by the end of the
tenth year after grant of authorization
will forfeit the portion of the
geographic-area-based license that
exceeds licensed facilities constructed
and operating on the date of the license
grant.
(d) Grandfathering provisions for
incumbent licensees. An incumbent
licensee’s service area shall be defined
by its originally-licensed 40 dBµV/m
field strength contour. Incumbent
licensees are permitted to add new or
modify transmit sites in this existing
service area so long as the original 40
dBµV/m field strength contour is not
expanded.
[FR Doc. 05–5406 Filed 3–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:17 Mar 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
13151
Pursuant
to section 4(b)(3)(B) of the ESA (16
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), for any petition to
Administration
revise the List of Endangered or
Threatened Wildlife and Plants which
50 CFR Parts 223 and 224
presents substantial scientific and
commercial information, NMFS is
[Docket No. 050304058–5058–01; I.D. No.
required to make a finding within 12
060204C]
months of the date of receipt of the
petition on whether the petitioned
RIN 0648–XB29
action is (a) not warranted, (b)
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
warranted, or (c) warranted but
and Plants; 12–Month Finding on a
precluded from immediate proposal by
Petition To List Elkhorn Coral,
other pending proposals of higher
priority.
Staghorn coral, and Fused-staghorn
On March 4, 2004, the Center for
coral as Threatened or Endangered
Biological Diversity (CBD) petitioned
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
NMFS to list elkhorn (Acropora
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
palmata), staghorn (A. cervicornis), and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
fused-staghorn (A. prolifera) coral as
Commerce.
either threatened or endangered under
ACTION: Notice of petition finding and
the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and
availability of a status review document. to designate critical habitat. On June 23,
2004, NMFS made a positive 90–day
SUMMARY: NMFS announces a 12–month finding (69 FR 34995) that the CBD
finding on a petition to add the elkhorn
presented substantial information
coral (Acropora palmata), staghorn coral indicating that the petitioned actions
(A. cervicornis), and fused-staghorn
may be warranted and announced the
coral (A. prolifera), throughout their
initiation of a formal status review as
known range, to the list of threatened
required by section 4(b)(3)(A) of the
and endangered wildlife and to
ESA.
designate critical habitat under the
In order to conduct a comprehensive
Endangered Species Act (ESA). Based
review, NMFS convened an Atlantic
on a review of the best available
Acropora Biological Review Team (BRT)
scientific and commercial information
to conduct the status review, which
on the status of the species, NMFS finds incorporates and summarizes the best
that the petitioned action is warranted
available scientific and commercial data
with respect to elkhorn and staghorn
to date. It addresses the status of the
corals and will promptly publish a
species, the five ESA listing factors, and
proposed rule to list these two species
current regulatory, conservation and
as threatened. Furthermore, NMFS
research efforts that may yield
concludes that listing fused-staghorn
protection. The BRT also reviewed and
coral is not warranted as it is a hybrid
considered materials received by NMFS
and does not constitute a species.
as a result of a Federal Register notice
and public meetings; substantive
DATES: The finding announced in this
materials were incorporated into the
document was made on March 3, 2005.
status review. Copies of the status
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Atlantic
review are available upon request from
Acropora status review document are
the Protected Resources Division, NMFS
available upon request from the
(see ADDRESSES). NMFS finds that with
Protected Resources Division, NMFS,
respect to elkhorn and staghorn corals,
9721 Executive Center Drive North, St.
the petitioned action is warranted at this
Petersburg, FL 33702. After March 17,
time. NMFS will promptly publish a
2005, please direct requests to our new
proposed rule to list these two species
address: 263 13th Ave. South, St.
as threatened. Furthermore, NMFS
Peterburg, FL 33701. The status review
concludes that listing fused-staghorn
is also available on the NMFS website
coral is not warranted as it is a hybrid
at https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
and does not constitute a species.
protres.htm.
According to section 4(b)(3(B) of the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
ESA, 16 U.S.C. 4(b)(3)(B), when a
Jennifer Moore or Dr. Stephania Bolden, petitioned action is warranted, a
NMFS Southeast Region, 727–570–5312, proposed regulation to implement the
action shall be promptly published in
or Ms. Marta Nammack, HQ Office of
Protected Resources, 301–713–1401, ext. the Federal Register. NMFS will
180. Please note the NMFS Southeast
immediately begin developing a
Regional Office is moving March 17,
proposed rule to list the two species as
2005 and after March 21, 2005, the new
threatened to comply with the ESA’s
telephone exchange will be 727–824–
requirement to publish the proposed
5312.
listing rule promptly. NMFS will also
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 52 (Friday, March 18, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13143-13151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5406]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 90
[WT Docket No. 05-62; FCC 05-31]
Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Provide for Flexible Use
of the 896-901 MHz and 935-940 MHz Bands Allotted to the Business and
Industrial Land Transportation Pool, and Oppositions
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission proposes amendments of its
rules to facilitate more flexible use of the 199 channels allocated to
the Business and Industrial Land Transportation (B/ILT) Pools in the
896-901/935-940 MHz (900 MHz) bands, by permitting any use of the B/ILT
channels in the 900 MHz band that is consistent with the band's fixed
and mobile allocations. In addition, the Commission proposes to license
the remaining spectrum using a geographic area licensing scheme, and to
adopt service rules, including licensing, technical and operational
rules for the new geographic licensees. Further, the Commission seeks
comment on competitive bidding rules and procedures to be used in the
event that mutually exclusive applications are filed for the 900 MHz
proposed geographic licenses.
DATES: Comments are due on or before April 18, 2005. Reply comments are
due May 2, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by WT Docket No. 05-62,
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Federal Communications Commission's Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: To receive filing instructions for e-mail comments,
commenters should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include
the following words in the body of the message, ``get form .'' A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Include
the docket number(s) in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Appropriate addresses for submitting comments and
reply comments may be found in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: 202-418-
0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
In addition to filing comments with the Secretary, a copy of any
comments on the Paperwork Reduction Act information collection
requirements contained herein should be submitted to Judith B. Herman,
Federal Communications Commission, Room 1-C804, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov,
and to Kristy L. LaLonde, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10234 NEOB, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, via the Internet to Kristy--L.
LaLonde@omb.eop.gov, or via fax at 202-395-5167.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Connelly, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0620.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Federal
Communications Commission's Notice and Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FCC
05-31, in WT Docket No. 05-62, adopted February 10, 2005, and released
February 16, 2005. The full text of this document is available for
public inspection during regular business hours at the FCC Reference
Information Center, 445 12th St., SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC
20554. The complete text may be purchased from the Commission's
duplicating contractor: Best Copy & Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street,
SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 800-378-3160,
facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail at www.fcc@bcpiweb.com">www.fcc@bcpiweb.com.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document does not contain proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law
104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed
information collection burden ``for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief
Act of 2002,
[[Page 13144]]
Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Pursuant to Sec. Sec. 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules,
47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply
comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this
document. Comments may be filed using: (1) The Commission's Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking
Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Filers
should follow the instructions provided on the website for submitting
comments.
For ECFS filers, if multiple docket or rulemaking numbers
appear in the caption of this proceeding, filers must transmit one
electronic copy of the comments for each docket or rulemaking number
referenced in the caption. In completing the transmittal screen, filers
should include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address,
and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Parties may also submit
an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions,
filers should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and include the following
words in the body of the message, ``get form.'' A sample form and
directions will be sent in response.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding,
filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
mail (although we continue to experience delays in receiving U.S.
Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to the Commission's
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
The Commission's contractor will receive hand-delivered or
messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002. The filing
hours at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries must be
held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be
disposed of before entering the building.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request materials in
accessible formats (braille, large print, electronic files, audio
format, etc.) by e-mail at FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0531 (voice), 202-418-7365
(TTY).
Synopsis of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
I. Background
1. In 1986, the Commission established a pool structure for the 900
MHz PLMR spectrum and allocated 2.5 MHz for the Industrial/Land
Transportation Pool (99 channels) and 2.5 MHz for the Business Pool
(100 channels) (collectively, the B/ILT Pools). The B/ILT Pools were
established for use by site-by-site licensees engaged in commercial
activities, the operation of educational, philanthropic, or
ecclesiastical institutions, clergy activities, or the operation of
hospitals, clinics, or medical associations. In addition, eligibility
was also provided for any corporations furnishing nonprofit radio
communication service to its parent corporation or subsidiary.
Currently, applications for use of the B/ILT frequencies are limited to
private, internal use systems.
2. On July 8, 2004, in its 800 MHz Report and Order, 69 FR 67,823,
the Commission adopted significant technical and procedural measures
designed to address the problem of interference to public safety
communications in the 800 MHz band. As part of its reconfiguration plan
at 800 MHz, the Commission consolidated the B/ILT Pools in the 800 MHz
and 900 MHz bands, allowing any eligible B/ILT licensee to be licensed
on the consolidated channels. The Commission also provided for
additional flexibility in the 900 MHz band by allowing 900 MHz PLMR
licensees to initiate CMRS operations on their currently authorized
spectrum or to assign their authorizations to others for CMRS use. The
Commission reasoned that since it permitted CMRS use of PLMR
frequencies in the 800 MHz land mobile band, similar rules should apply
in the 900 MHz land mobile spectrum, in the interest of regulatory
symmetry. The Commission also noted that in order to provide the
``green space'' necessary to effect reconfiguration of the 800 MHz
band, some operations may need to shift from the 800 MHz to 900 MHz
band.
II. Discussion
A. Flexible Use, Regulatory Framework, and Assignment of Licenses
3. The Commission proposes service rules for the new 900 MHz
channels that would provide licensees flexible use. The Commission
expects the economic efficiencies of flexibility to foster, not deter,
technology development and investment in communications services and
systems. The Commission seeks comment on its tentative conclusion to
continue to license these bands under the framework of part 90 of our
rules.
B. Band Plan and Size of Geographic Service Areas
4. The Commission tentatively concludes that it should license this
900 MHz spectrum using a geographic area licensing scheme, believing
that geographic area licensing will maximize flexibility, permit new
and innovative technologies to rapidly develop in these bands, and
allow a licensee substantial flexibility to respond to market demand,
resulting in significant improvements in spectrum utilization. Should
the Commission adopt a geographic area approach for licensing the
flexible-use spectrum, it seeks comment on the appropriate size of that
geographic area. In particular, the Commission asks whether it should
adopt Major Economic Areas (MEAs) or Basic Economic Areas (EAs). The
Commission notes that MEAs may have the effect of creating
opportunities for both existing licensees and new entrants to meet
customer demands for wide-area service, increasing spectrum efficiency,
providing better quality service to end users, and allowing service to
reach potential end users that may otherwise be without adequate
communication options, while Basic Economic Areas (EAs) may provide
greater opportunities for small and medium-sized businesses to
successfully compete against larger, well-financed bidders, and that
EAs may facilitate the ability of incumbents and other small and
medium-sized operators of smaller systems to participate in geographic
area licensing.
C. Channel Block Size
5. The Commission seeks comment on its proposal to license the 900
MHz flexible-use channels in nineteen blocks of ten contiguous channels
each, and one block of nine contiguous channels.
[[Page 13145]]
The Commission believes the proposed configuration can provide
operational flexibility and efficiency by allowing providers to use new
technologies and compete effectively with other commercial providers,
and avoids the transaction costs associated with reaggregation of
spectrum, while promoting the flexibility necessary to facilitate
secondary market uses. The Commission also asks whether a more viable
option under an EA-based licensing approach might include nine blocks
of twenty non-contiguous channels each and one block of nineteen non-
contiguous channels, which would allow potential bidders to acquire a
larger number of channels, albeit in smaller geographic areas.
Commenters might also consider the option of dedicating the upper four
channel blocks (i.e., QQ, RR, SS, TT) to traditional B/ILT services.
The Commission also asks commenters to consider whether to permit
potential bidders to bid on licenses comprising multiple band plans
according to the band plan configuration they prefer and use the
bidders' collective valuation of licenses consistent with each band
plan in determining which band plan to implement. The Commission seeks
comment on its proposal to permit licensees to aggregate blocks and to
allow both incumbents and new entrants to bid on the spectrum.
D. Operational Flexibility
6. The Commission seeks comment on its tentative conclusion that
geographic area licensees in the 900 MHz band should be permitted to
construct stations at any authorized site and on any available channel
within their licensing area, and that geographic area licensees may
expand or modify facilities throughout their service areas without
prior Commission approval, so long as the systems continue to be in
compliance with the Commission's technical and operational rules,
protect incumbents, and are consistent with international requirements
and approvals.
E. Treatment of Incumbent Systems
7. The Commission proposes that geographic area licensees afford
the same protection to incumbent B/ILT systems as is provided to
incumbents by existing 900 MHz SMR MTA licensees, and tentatively
concludes that the geographic area licensee's co-channel obligations
cease upon the deletion of a revoked or terminated co-channel station
authorization from the Commission's licensing records. Although the
Commission believes this interference protection proposal will
adequately protect incumbent operations, it asks commenters to consider
whether additional interference protection requirements are needed. The
Commission notes that licensees may be faced with the same interference
problems that necessitated the remedies adopted in the 800 MHz R&O
unless equivalent interference abatement requirements are established
at 900 MHz. Also, the Commission proposes to define the existing
service area of an incumbent B/ILT system by its originally-licensed 40
dB[mu]V/m field strength contour, and to permit incumbent licensees to
add or modify transmit sites in their existing service area, without
prior approval or without post construction notification to the
Commission, so long as their original 40 dB[mu]V/m signal is not
expanded.
8.The Commission also seeks comment on whether to provide an option
for incumbent licensees to return their licensees through an auction
that includes the new geographic area overlay licenses for white space
as well as any site-based licenses currently held by incumbent
licensees who may be willing to exchange or sell their licenses. In
versions of this general form of auction discussed by the Commission,
existing licensees would not be required to relinquish their rights,
but they would be likely to do so if compensation for their license
exceeded the value to them of continuing with their current use. Such a
mechanism to promote the efficient transition of incumbent users may be
most useful in situations in which the anticipated use of the spectrum
under new service rules is incompatible with the continued existence of
incumbents operating legacy systems in the band. While the Commission
expects that the overlay licenses it makes available in this proceeding
will be useful for providing new services regardless of the existence
of site-based B/ILT users, the availability of incumbent providers'
licenses may encourage a quicker and smoother transition of the 900 MHz
spectrum to uses consistent with the more flexible service rules
proposed here.
F. Emission and Field Strength Limits
9. Regarding emissions, the Commission seeks comment on its
proposal that, on any frequency in a geographic area licensee's
spectrum block that is adjacent to a non-geographic area frequency, the
power of any emission shall be attenuated below the transmitter power
(P) by at least 43 plus 10 log10 (P) decibels or 80
decibels, whichever is the lesser attenuation; the Commission
tentatively concludes that this emission mask would adequately protect
licensees in neighboring spectrum. Regarding field strength limits, the
Commission requests comment on whether 40 dB[mu]V/m is an appropriate
field strength level for a geographic area licensee's operations at its
service area border, and asks commenters to address whether this limit
furthers the Commission's goal of avoiding harmful interference or
whether stricter requirements are necessary.
G. Performance Requirements and Other Operating and Technical Rules
10. The Commission proposes to require new 900 MHz licensees to
submit to the Commission a showing of substantial service (as opposed
to a population benchmark) in their licensed area within either five or
ten years of being licensed, believing that this performance
requirement could provide greater flexibility for parties interested in
entering into spectrum leasing arrangements involving this spectrum, as
well as for providing service to rural or sparsely populated areas. The
Commission also seeks comment on whether it should modify existing
coverage requirements for 900 MHz SMR services to mirror the proposed
substantial service showing for those 900 MHz licensees permitted
flexible spectrum use; whether to retain or eliminate loading
requirements as they apply to existing B/ILT authorizations; and
whether the general provisions of part 90 to the 900 MHz B/ILT ``white
space'' spectrum is appropriate.
H. Competitive Bidding Procedures
11. The Commission proposes to conduct the auction for these 900
MHz channel licenses under the general competitive bidding rules
established in part 1, subpart Q of the Commission's Rules, and
substantially consistent with the bidding procedures that have been
employed in previous Commission auctions, including rules governing
designated entities, application and payment procedures, reporting
requirements, collusion issues, and unjust enrichment. The Commission
also proposes small business bidding credits to further the statutory
goals of ensuring that small businesses, rural telephone companies, and
businesses owned by members of minority groups and women are given the
opportunity to participate in the provision of spectrum-based services.
The Commission seeks comment on its proposal to define a small business
as an entity with average annual gross revenues for the three preceding
years not to exceed $15 million, and to define a very small
[[Page 13146]]
business as an entity with average annual gross revenues for the three
preceding years not to exceed $3 million. The Commission seeks comment
on these proposals.
III. Procedural Matters
A. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
12. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA),
the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of
the policies and rules proposed in the Notice. The analysis is found in
Appendix B of the NPRM. The Commission requests written public comment
on the analysis. Comments must be filed by the same dates as listed in
paragraph 70 of the NPRM, and must have a separate and distinct heading
designating them as responses to the IRFA. The Commission's Consumer
and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, will
send a copy of the NPRM, including the IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
B. Need for, and Objectives of, the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Memorandum Opinion and Order
13. In the NPRM, the Commission proposes amendments to part 90 of
its rules to facilitate more flexible use of the 199 channels allocated
to the Business and Industrial Land Transportation (B/ILT) Pool in the
896-901/935-940 MHz (900 MHz) bands. The Commission proposes to permit
any use of the B/ILT channels in the 900 MHz band that is consistent
with the band's fixed and mobile allocations, and to license the
remaining spectrum or ``white space'' using a geographic area licensing
scheme and propose competitive bidding rules to select from among
mutually exclusive applicants. The Commission also sets forth proposals
for auction procedures for the remaining 900 MHz spectrum in the B/ILT
category channels. The Commission believes these proposed rules will
serve its twin goals of providing service to the public consistently
and expeditiously, and allowing the marketplace to respond to consumer
demands, and notes that allowing for flexible use of this spectrum will
greatly aid in facilitating band reconfiguration occurring at 800 MHz.
The Commission believes that the rules and policies proposed in the
NPRM strike a fair and equitable balance between the interests of
incumbent B/ILT licensees, and those seeking to provide geographic area
service, and further believes that these rules and policies will
promote competition, while providing opportunities for incumbents to
continue to pursue their business plans.
C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which
the Rules Will Apply
14. The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of, and where
feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be
affected by the proposed rules and policies, if adopted. The RFA
generally defines the term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning
as the terms ``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small
governmental jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term ``small business''
has the same meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the
Small Business Act. A ``small business concern'' is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of
operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the
SBA.
15. Small Businesses. Nationwide, there are a total of 22.4 million
small businesses, according to SBA data.
16. Small Organizations. Nationwide, there are approximately 1.6
million small organizations.
17. Small Governmental Jurisdictions. The term ``small governmental
jurisdiction'' is defined as ``governments of cities, towns, townships,
villages, school districts, or special districts, with a population of
less than fifty thousand.'' As of 1997, there were approximately 87,453
governmental jurisdictions in the United States. This number includes
39,044 county governments, municipalities, and townships, of which
37,546 (approximately 96.2%) have populations of fewer than 50,000, and
of which 1,498 have populations of 50,000 or more. Thus, we estimate
the number of small governmental jurisdictions overall to be 84,098 or
fewer.
18. The Commission has determined that 1,040, or more, licenses
will be awarded in the 896-901 MHz and 935-940 MHz B/ILT MHz bands; the
Commission does not yet know how many applicants or licensees in these
bands will be small entities. Thus, the Commission assumes, for
purposes of this IRFA, that all prospective licensees are small
entities as that term is defined by the SBA or by our proposed small
business definitions for these bands. The Commission invites comment on
this analysis.
19. Wireless Service Providers. The SBA has developed a small
business size standard for wireless firms within the two broad economic
census categories of ``Paging'' and ``Cellular and Other Wireless
Telecommunications.'' Under both SBA categories, a wireless business is
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. For the census category of
Paging, Census Bureau data for 1997 show that there were 1,320 firms in
this category, total, that operated for the entire year. Of this total,
1,303 firms had employment of 999 or fewer employees, and an additional
17 firms had employment of 1,000 employees or more. Thus, under this
category and associated small business size standard, the great
majority of firms can be considered small. For the census category
Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications, Census Bureau data for
1997 show that there were 977 firms in this category, total, that
operated for the entire year. Of this total, 965 firms had employment
of 999 or fewer employees, and an additional 12 firms had employment of
1,000 employees or more. Thus, under this second category and size
standard, the great majority of firms can, again, be considered small.
20. Wireless Telephony. Wireless telephony includes cellular,
personal communications services, and specialized mobile radio
telephony carriers. The SBA has developed a small business size
standard for ``Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications''
services. Under that SBA small business size standard, a business is
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. According to Commission data,
447 carriers reported that they were engaged in the provision of
wireless telephony. We have estimated that 245 of these are small under
the SBA small business size standard.
21. Broadband Personal Communications Service. The broadband
personal communications services (PCS) spectrum is divided into six
frequency blocks designated A through F, and the Commission has held
auctions for each block. The Commission has created a small business
size standard for Blocks C and F as an entity that has average gross
revenues of less than $40 million in the three previous calendar years.
For Block F, an additional small business size standard for ``very
small business'' was added and is defined as an entity that, together
with its affiliates, has average gross revenues of not more than $15
million for the preceding three calendar years. These small business
size standards, in the context of broadband PCS auctions, have been
approved by the SBA. No small businesses within the SBA-approved small
business size standards bid successfully for licenses
[[Page 13147]]
in Blocks A and B. There were 90 winning bidders that qualified as
small entities in the Block C auctions. A total of 93 ``small'' and
``very small'' business bidders won approximately 40 percent of the
1,479 licenses for Blocks D, E, and F. On March 23, 1999, the
Commission reauctioned 155 C, D, E, and F Block licenses; there were
113 small business winning bidders.
22. On January 26, 2001, the Commission completed the auction of
422 C and F Broadband PCS licenses in Auction No. 35. Of the 35 winning
bidders in this auction, 29 qualified as ``small'' or ``very small''
businesses. Subsequent events concerning Auction 35, including judicial
and agency determinations, resulted in a total of 163 C and F Block
licenses being available for grant.
23. Cellular Licensees. The SBA has developed a small business size
standard for wireless firms within the broad economic census category
``Cellular and Other Wireless Telecommunications.'' Under this SBA
category, a wireless business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer
employees. For the census category Cellular and Other Wireless
Telecommunications firms, Census Bureau data for 1997 show that there
were 977 firms in this category, total, that operated for the entire
year. Of this total, 965 firms had employment of 999 or fewer
employees, and an additional 12 firms had employment of 1,000 employees
or more. Thus, under this category and size standard, the great
majority of firms can be considered small. According to Commission
data, 447 carriers reported that they were engaged in the provision of
cellular service, personal communications service, or specialized
mobile radio telephony services, which are placed together in the data.
We have estimated that 245 of these are small, under the SBA small
business size standard.
D. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements
24. The NPRM proposes to amend part 90 of the Commission's rules to
facilitate more flexible use of the 199 channels allocated to the
Business and Industrial Land Transportation (B/ILT) Pools in the 896-
901/935-940 MHz (900 MHz) bands, to permit any use of the B/ILT
channels in the 900 MHz band that is consistent with the band's fixed
and mobile allocations. It also proposes to license the unencumbered
spectrum through geographic area licensing. Accordingly, the Commission
proposes service rules, including licensing, technical and operational
rules for the new geographic licensees, and seeks comment on defining
the rights of B/ILT licensees already operating in the 900 MHz band.
The Commission also seeks comment on competitive bidding rules and
procedures to be used in the event that mutually exclusive applications
are filed for the 900 MHz proposed geographic licenses.
25. In paragraphs 12-14 of the NPRM, the Commission proposes
service rules for the new 900 MHz channels that would provide licensees
with the flexibility to employ this spectrum for any use permitted by
the United States Table of Frequency Allocations contained in part 2 of
our rules (i.e., fixed or mobile services), believing that such
flexibility fully meets criteria set forth in section 303(y) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended. The NPRM tentatively concludes
that such use would be consistent with applicable international
agreements, and that the public interest benefits of flexibility are
numerous, and notes that the Commission has identified the
establishment of maximum feasible flexibility in both spectrum
designations and allocations and service rules as a critical means of
ensuring that spectrum is put to its most beneficial use.
The Commission believes that the economic efficiencies of
flexibility foster, rather than deter, technology development and
investment in communications services and systems.
26. In paragraphs 17-19 of the NPRM, the Commission seeks comment
on its proposal to license this 900 MHz spectrum using geographic area
licensing, believing that such a licensing scheme is well-suited for
the types of fixed and mobile services that will likely develop in this
overlay band. The Commission invites commenters to explain any
opposition and the costs and benefits associated with any preferable
licensing proposal. In paragraphs 21-25, the Commission seeks comment
on its proposal to adopt Major Economic Areas (``MEAs''), or, in the
alternative, Economic Areas (``EAs'') as the appropriate geographic
size. On the one hand, allowing the new 900 MHz licensees the use of
frequencies for systems providing coverage across wide areas will
increase spectrum efficiency, provide better quality service to end
users, and allow service to reach potential end users that may
otherwise be without adequate communication options, and that the MEA-
based licensees will be in a better position to address the needs of
system users, customers, or lessees that have wide-area requirements;
on the other hand, EAs, which are more than three times the number of
delineated economic areas than MEAs, may facilitate the ability of
incumbents and other small and medium-sized operators of smaller
systems to participate in geographic area licensing. Adopting an EA-
based licensing scheme may permit small bidders and rural companies
wishing smaller license areas to obtain them directly at auction rather
than facing the uncertainty and transaction costs of working out post-
auction partitioning agreements.
27. In paragraphs 26-30 of the NPRM, the Commission proposes to
license the 900 MHz flexible-use channels in nineteen blocks of ten
contiguous channels each, and one block of nine contiguous channels,
with each ten-channel block separately licensed. Under the Commission's
proposal, applicants would be permitted to aggregate blocks if they
wish, without eligibility restriction for any channel block. The
Commission seeks comment on whether the proposed 900 MHz channel block
plan strikes a balance in affording small, medium and large operators
the opportunity to obtain sufficient spectrum to establish viable and
competitive wide-area systems, and whether the plan offers a middle
ground between larger channel blocks that may block entry to new,
smaller operators, and smaller block sizes that may hinder wide-area
operations.
28. In paragraphs 45-51 of the NPRM, the Commission proposes that
the new 900 MHz licensees submit to the Commission a showing of
substantial service in their licensed area within five or ten years of
being licensed. In making this proposal, the Commission notes that a
population-based benchmark may be a considerable obstacle for the
provision of services in rural or sparsely populated areas, and that
population-based coverage requirements may be difficult to achieve due
to existing band encumbrances. The Commission also believes that the
ten-year substantial service requirement provides greater flexibility
for parties interested in entering into spectrum leasing arrangements
involving this spectrum.
29. In paragraphs 58-63 of the NPRM, the Commission proposes small
business bidding credits to further the goals of ensuring that small
businesses, rural telephone companies, and businesses owned by members
of minority groups and women are given the opportunity to participate
in the provision of spectrum-based services, and promoting economic
opportunity and competition by avoiding excessive concentration of
licenses and by disseminating licenses among a wide variety of
applicants, including small businesses, rural telephone companies,
[[Page 13148]]
and businesses owned by members of minority groups and women. To that
end, the Commission proposes a 10 percent bidding credit for small
business and a 15 percent bidding credit for very small businesses.
30. The Commission requests comment on how these proposed rules may
be modified to reduce the burden on small entities and still meet the
objectives of the proceeding.
E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
31. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant
alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach,
which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1)
The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities;
(3) the use of performance rather than design standards; and (4) an
exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof for small
entities.
32. The NPRM proposes to establish small business bidding credits
to further the goals of ensuring that small businesses, rural telephone
companies, and businesses owned by members of minority groups and women
are given the opportunity to participate in the provision of spectrum-
based services, with a 10 percent bidding credit for small business and
a 15 percent bidding credit for very small businesses. In addition, the
NPRM solicits comment on a number of proposals and alternatives
regarding the service rules for the 900 MHz band, and seeks to adopt
rules that will reduce regulatory burdens, promote innovate services
and encourage flexible use of this spectrum. The Commission believes
the proposed rules will open up economic opportunities to a variety of
spectrum users, which could include small businesses. Because the
Commission seeks to minimize, to the extent possible, the economic
impact on small businesses, the NPRM sets forth various proposals and
alternatives for parties to consider.
33. The NPRM invites comment on various alternative licensing and
service rules and on a number of issues relating to how the Commission
should craft service rules for this spectrum that could have an impact
on small entities. The NPRM proposes a geographic area approach to
service areas, as opposed to a station-defined licensing approach, and
seeks comment on the appropriate size of service areas. Specifically,
the NPRM asks for comment on whether smaller geographic areas would
better serve the needs of small entities.
34. The regulatory burdens proposed in the NPRM appear necessary in
order to ensure that the public receives the benefits of innovative new
services, or enhanced existing services, in a prompt and efficient
manner. The Commission will continue to examine alternatives in the
future with the objectives of eliminating unnecessary regulations and
minimizing any significant economic impact on small entities. The
Commission invites comment on any additional significant alternatives
parties believe should be considered and on how the approach outlined
in the NPRM will impact small entities, including small businesses and
small government entities.
IV. Ordering Clauses
35. Pursuant to the authority of sections 1, 2, 4(i), 7, 10, 201,
214, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 319, 324, 332 and 333 of the
Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 157, 160, 201,
214, 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 319, 324, 332, 333, this Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking is adopted.
List of Subjects of 47 CFR part 90
Communications common carriers.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
Proposed Rule Changes
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 90 as follows:
PART 90--PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES
1. The authority citation of part 90 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sections 4(i), 11, 303(g), 303(r), and 332(c)(7) of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161,
303(g), 303(r), 332(c)(7).
2. Amend Sec. 90.7 by adding the definitions ``Major Economic Area
(MEA)'' and ``MEA-based license or MEA license'' in alphabetical order
to read as follows:
Sec. 90.7 Definitions.
* * * * *
Major Economic Area (MEA). An aggregation of Basic Economic Areas
(BEAs) into 52 regions, including the Gulf of Mexico.
* * * * *
MEA-based license or MEA license. A license authorizing the right
to use a specified block of SMR spectrum with one of the 52 Major
Economic Areas (``MEAs'').
* * * * *
Sec. 90.210 [Amended]
3. Amend Sec. 90.210 as follows:
(a) In the entry for 5850-5925 of the table ``APPLICABLE EMISSIONS
MASKS'' redesignate footnote 4 as footnote 5; and
(b) In the same table amend the entry for 896-901/935-940 Frequency
band MHz by adding a new footnote 4.
Sec. 90.210 Emission masks.
* * * * *
Applicable Emission Masks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mask for equipment Mask for equipment
Frequency band (MHz) with audio low pass without audio low
filter pass filter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
896-901/935-940 \4\......... I J
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Equipment used in this band licensed to MTA, EA or MEA or non
geographic based systems shall comply with the emission mask
provisions of Sec. 90.669 of this chapter.
[[Page 13149]]
* * * * *
4. Amend Sec. 90.617 by revising the section heading, revising
paragraph (c) preceding Table 3, by removing the undesignated paragraph
also preceding Table 3 (Table 3 remains unchanged), by revising
paragraph (f) preceding Table 6 (Table 6 remains unchanged), and by
adding Table 7 and a Note to Table 7 to paragraph (f) to read as
follows:
Sec. 90.617 Frequencies in the 809.750-824/854.750-869 MHz, and 896-
901/935-940 MHz bands available for trunked, conventional, or cellular
system use in non-border areas.
* * * * *
(c) The channels listed in Table 3 are available to applicants
eligible in the Industrial/Business Pool of subpart C of this part but
exclude Special Mobilized Radio Systems as defined in Sec. 90.603(c).
These frequencies are available in non-border areas. Specialized Mobile
Radio (SMR) systems may be authorized on these frequencies after
[Effective date of Report and Order]. For multi-channel systems,
channels may be grouped vertically or horizontally as they appear in
the following table.
* * * * *
(f) The channels listed in Table 6 are available for operations
only to eligibles in the SMR category--which consists of Specialized
Mobile Radio (SMR) stations and eligible end users. These frequencies
are available in non-border areas.
* * * * *
Note to Table 7: The channels listed in Table 7 are available to
Business/Industrial/Land Transportation of SMR eligibles for EA-
based or MEA-based licensing.
Table 7.--896-901/935-940 MHz Band Channels (199 Channels) Available After [Effective Date of Report and Order]
for Business/Industrial/Land Transportation or SMR Eligibles for EA-Based or MEA-Based Licensing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Block Channel Nos.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AA............................. 11-12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-20
BB............................. 31-32-33-34-35-36-37-38-39-40
CC............................. 51-52-53-54-55-56-57-58-59-60
DD............................. 71-72-73-74-75-76-77-78-79-80
EE............................. 91-92-93-94-95-96-97-98-99-100
FF............................. 111-112-113-114-115-116-117-118-119-120
GG............................. 131-132-133-134-135-136-137-138-139-140
HH............................. 151-152-153-154-155-156-157-158-159-160
II............................. 171-172-173-174-175-176-177-178-179-180
JJ............................. 191-192-193-194-195-196-197-198-199-200
KK............................. 211-212-213-214-215-216-217-218-219-220
LL............................. 231-232-233-234-235-236-237-238-239-240
MM............................. 251-252-253-254-255-256-257-258-259-260
NN............................. 271-272-273-274-275-276-277-278-279-280
OO............................. 291-292-293-294-295-296-297-298-299-300
PP............................. 311-312-313-314-315-316-317-318-319-320
QQ............................. 331-332-333-334-335-336-337-338-339-340
RR............................. 351-352-353-354-355-356-357-358-359-360
SS............................. 371-372-373-374-375-376-377-378-379-380
TT............................. 391-392-393-394-395-396-397-398-399
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
5. Amend Sec. 90.619 by revising paragraph (b)(1) and removing the
undesignated text following paragraph (b)(1) (Table 1 remains
unchanged); revise paragraph (b)(2) and redesignate Table 2 in
paragraph (b)(2) as Table 2A, and by adding Table 2B, and a Note to
Table 2B in paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 90.619 Frequencies available for use in the U.S./Mexico and
U.S./Canada border areas.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The channels listed in Table 1 are available to applicants
eligible in the Industrial/Business Pool of subpart C of this part but
exclude Special Mobilized Radio Systems as defined in Sec. 90.603(c).
These frequencies are available within the Mexico border region.
Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) systems may be authorized on these
frequencies after [Effective date of Report and Order]. For multi-
channel systems, channels may be grouped vertically or horizontally as
they appear in the following table. Channels numbered above 200 may be
used only subject to the power flux density limits stated in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section.
* * * * *
(2) The channels listed in Table 2A below are available for
operations only to eligibles in the SMR category--which consists of
Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) stations and eligible end users. These
frequencies are available in the Mexico border region.
* * * * *
Note to Table 2B: The channels listed in Table 2B are available
to Business/Industrial/Land Transportation or SMR eligibles for EA
or MEA based licensing in the Mexico border region after [Effective
date of Report and Order].
Table 2B.--896-901/935-940 MHz Band Channels (199 Channels) Available After [Effective Date of Report and Order]
for Business/Industrial/Land Transportation or SMR Eligibles for EA-Based or MEA-Based Licensing in United
States-Mexico Border Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Block Channel Nos.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AA............................. 11-12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-20
[[Page 13150]]
BB............................. 31-32-33-34-35-36-37-38-39-40
CC............................. 51-52-53-54-55-56-57-58-59-60
DD............................. 71-72-73-74-75-76-77-78-79-80
EE............................. 91-92-93-94-95-96-97-98-99-100
FF............................. 111-112-113-114-115-116-117-118-119-120
GG............................. 131-132-133-134-135-136-137-138-139-140
HH............................. 151-152-153-154-155-156-157-158-159-160
II............................. 171-172-173-174-175-176-177-178-179-180
JJ............................. 191-192-193-194-195-196-197-198-199-200
KK............................. 211-212-213-214-215-216-217-218-219-220
LL............................. 231-232-233-234-235-236-237-238-239-240
MM............................. 251-252-253-254-255-256-257-258-259-260
NN............................. 271-272-273-274-275-276-277-278-279-280
OO............................. 291-292-293-294-295-296-297-298-299-300
PP............................. 311-312-313-314-315-316-317-318-319-320
QQ............................. 331-332-333-334-335-336-337-338-339-340
RR............................. 351-352-353-354-355-356-357-358-359-360
SS............................. 371-372-373-374-375-376-377-378-379-380
TT............................. 391-392-393-394-395-396-397-398-399
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Channels numbered above 200 may only be used subject to the power flux density limits at or beyond the Mexico
border as stated in paragraph (4) of this section.
* * * * *
6. Amend Sec. 90.621 by revising paragraph (b) introductory text
to read as follows:
Sec. 90.621 Selection and assignment of frequencies.
* * * * *
(b) Stations authorized on frequencies listed in this subpart,
except for those stations authorized pursuant to paragraph (g) of this
section and geographic-area-based systems, will be assigned frequencies
solely on the basis of fixed distance separation criteria. The
separation between co-channel systems will be a minimum of 113 km (70
mi) with one exception. For incumbent licensees in Channel Blocks G
through V, that have received the consent of all affected parties or a
certified frequency coordinator to utilize an 18 dB[mu]V/m signal
strength interference contour (see Sec. 90.693), the separation
between co-channel systems will be a minimum of 173 km (107 mi). The
following exceptions to these separations shall apply:
* * * * *
7. Amend Sec. 90.669 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows.
The note following paragraph (a) remains unchanged.
Sec. 90.669 Emission limits.
(a) Out-of-band emission requirements shall apply only to the
``outer'' channels included in an MTA, EA, or MEA licensee and to
spectrum adjacent to interior channels used by incumbent licensees. On
any frequency in a MTA, EA, or MEA geographic-area-based licensee's
spectrum block that is adjacent to another licensee's frequency, the
power of any emission shall be attenuated below the transmitter power
(P) by at least 43 plus 10 log10(P) decibels or 80 decibels,
whichever is the lesser attenuation.
* * * * *
8. Revise Sec. 90.671 to read as follows:
Sec. 90.671 Field strength limits.
The predicted or measured field strength at any location on the
border of the service area for 896-901/935-940 MHz geographic-area-
based licensees shall not exceed 40 dB[mu]V/m unless all co-channel
bordering geographic-area-based licensees agree to a higher field
strength. Geographic-area-based licensees are also required to
coordinate their frequency usage with co-channel adjacent geographic-
area-based licensees and all other affected parties. To the extent that
a single entity obtains licenses for adjacent MTAs, EAs or MEAs on the
same channel block, it will not be required to coordinate its
operations in this manner. In the event that this standard conflicts
with the geographic-area-based licensee's obligation to provide co-
channel protection to incumbent licensees under Sec. 90.621(b), the
requirements of Sec. 90.621(b) shall prevail.
9. Amend subpart S by adding the undesignated center heading and
Sec. Sec. 90.678, 90.679, and 90.680 to read as follows:
Policies Governing Licensing and Use of EA-Based or MEA-Based Business/
Industrial/Land Transportation or SMR Systems in the 896-901/935-940
MHz Band
Sec. 90.678 EA-Based or MEA-Based Business/Industrial/Land
Transportation or SMR service areas.
EA or MEA licenses for spectrum blocks AA, BB, through TT, in the
896-940 MHz band listed in table 7 of Sec. 90.617(f) are available in
175 Economic Areas (EAs) or 52 Major Economic Areas (MEAs) as defined
in Sec. 90.7. Within these EAs or MEAs, licenses will be authorized in
ten channel blocks as specified in table 7 of Sec. 90.617(f) through
the competitive bidding procedures described in subpart U of this part.
Sec. 90.679 EA or MEA-based Business/Industrial/Land Transportation
or SMR system operations.
(a) EA or MEA-based licensees authorized in the 896-901/935-940 MHz
band pursuant to Sec. 90.678 may construct and operate base stations
using any frequency identified in their spectrum block anywhere within
their authorized licensed area, provided that:
(1) The EA or MEA licensee complies with any rules and
international agreements that restrict use of frequencies identified in
their spectrum block, including the provisions of Sec. 90.619 relating
to U.S./Canadian and U.S./Mexican border areas.
(2) The EA or MEA licensee limits its field strength at any
location on the border of the service area in accordance
[[Page 13151]]
with Sec. 90.671 and masks its emissions in accordance with Sec.
90.669.
(b) In the event that the authorization for a previously authorized
co-channel station within the geographic-area-based licensee's
authorized spectrum block is terminated or revoked, the licensee's co-
channel obligations to such station will cease upon deletion of the
facility from the Commission's licensing record. The EA or MEA licensee
then will be able to construct and operate base stations using such
frequency.
Sec. 90.680 Authorization, construction and implementation of EA or
MEA-based licenses and Grandfathering provisions for incumbent
licensees.
(a) Geographic-area-based licenses in the 896-901/935-940 MHz band
will be issued for a term not to exceed ten years.
(b) Each geographic-area-based licensee in the 896-901/935-940 MHz
band must demonstrate, through a showing to the Commission ten years
from the date of license grant, that it is providing substantial
service within its service area.
(c) Geographic-area-based licensees who fail to make a convincing
showing of substantial service by the end of the tenth year after grant
of authorization will forfeit the portion of the geographic-area-based
license that exceeds licensed facilities constructed and operating on
the date of the license grant.
(d) Grandfathering provisions for incumbent licensees. An incumbent
licensee's service area shall be defined by its originally-licensed 40
dB[mu]V/m field strength contour. Incumbent licensees are permitted to
add new or modify transmit sites in this existing service area so long
as the original 40 dB[mu]V/m field strength contour is not expanded.
[FR Doc. 05-5406 Filed 3-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P