Special Local Regulations; Dania Beach/Hollywood Super Boat Race, Dania Beach/Hollywood, FL, 13122-13124 [05-5336]
Download as PDF
13122
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 52
Friday, March 18, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD07–05–015]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations; Dania
Beach/Hollywood Super Boat Race,
Dania Beach/Hollywood, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary special local
regulation for the Dania Beach/
Hollywood Super Boat Race offshore in
Dania Beach/Hollywood, Florida. These
special local regulations restrict the
movement of non-participating vessels
and persons in the regulated race area
and provide a viewing area for spectator
craft. This rule is needed to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters
during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
May 17, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to: Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Miami, 100
MacArthur Causeway, Miami Beach, Fl
33139 Attn: BMC R. Terrell or BMC D.
Vaughn. Sector Miami Deck/ATON
maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, will
become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at
Coast Guard Sector Miami, 100
MacArthur Causeway, Miami Beach,
Florida between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Boatswain’s Mate Chief Richard Terrell
or Boatswain’s Mate Chief Daniel
Vaughn, at (305) 535–4317.
SUMMARY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:20 Mar 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion of Proposed Rule
Request for Comments
This rule creates two regulated areas,
a regulated race area and a regulated
viewing area (regulated areas). These
regulated areas provide for the safety of
life on navigable waters and minimize
the dangers associated with powerboat
races. These dangers include race craft
traveling at high speeds in close
proximity to race participants, spectator
craft. This regulation keeps event
participants, spectator craft and
recreational vessels at a safe distance
from one another.
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking CGD07–05–015,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Commander,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Miami at the
address under ADDRESSES explaining
why one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
Super Boat International Productions
Inc. is sponsoring a high-speed power
boat race event on July 17, 2005, from
10 a.m. until 5 p.m. in the Atlantic
Ocean offshore from Dania Beach/
Hollywood, Florida. The race organizers
anticipate 35 race participants and 100
spectator craft. The event will take place
outside of the marked channel and will
not interfere with commercial shipping.
Recreational and fishing vessels
normally operate in the area that will be
affected by the establishment of a
special local regulation. This rule is
required to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters, due to the dangers
associated with power boat races. The
proposed rule prohibits nonparticipating vessels and persons from
entering the regulated race areas during
the event. A Coast Guard Patrol
Commander will be present during the
event to monitor compliance with this
regulation.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
The proposed rule affects a limited
area offshore of Dania Beach/
Hollywood, Florida and will be effective
for only 7 hours on July 17, 2005,
specifically from 10 a.m. until 5 p.m.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the
following entities, some of which may
be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of the Atlantic
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 52 / Friday, March 18, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Ocean near Dania Beach/Hollywood,
Florida from 10 a.m. until 5 p.m. on July
17, 2005. The Coast Guard certifies
under U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities, because this rule would be in
effect for only 7 hours. The rule also
regulates a small area, and commercial
and recreational vessels may be allowed
to transit through the zone between
races with permission of the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander. Moreover, all
vessel traffic can pass safely around the
regulated areas. Before the effective
period, we will issue maritime
advisories over VHF–FM radio to allow
the maritime community to plan
accordingly.
If you think your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT for assistance in understanding
and participating in this rulemaking.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:20 Mar 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13123
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule should be categorically excluded,
under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of
the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because
this regulation is a special local
regulation issued in conjunction with an
organized water event of limited
duration. Under Figure 2–1, Paragraph
34(h), an ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we
make the final decision on whether the
rule should be categorically excluded
from further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
13124
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 52 / Friday, March 18, 2005 / Proposed Rules
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
40 CFR Part 52
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 100.35T–07–021
to read as follows:
§ 100.35T–07–021 Dania Beach/Hollywood
Super Boat Race; Dania Beach/Hollywood,
Florida.
(a) Definitions. (1) Regulated race
area. The regulated race area
encompasses all waters located inside of
a line connecting the following
positions offshore of Dania Beach/
Hollywood, Florida:
Point 1: 26°03′41″ N, 080°05′01″ W
Point 2: 26°03′41″ N, 080°06′23″ W
Point 3: 26°00′07″ N, 080°05′36″ W
Point 4: 26°00′10″ N, 080°06′50″ W
All coordinates referenced use Datum:
NAD 1983.
(2) Regulated viewing area. The
regulated viewing area for spectator
craft encompasses all waters located
within a line connecting the following
positions offshore Dania Beach/
Hollywood, Florida;
Point 1: 26°03′41″ N, 080°05′30″ W
Point 2: 26°03′41″ N, 080°05′01″ W
Point 3: 26°00′07″ N, 080°05′56″ W
Point 4: 26°00′07″ N, 080°05′36″ W
All coordinates referenced use Datum
NAD: 1983.
(3) Coast Guard Patrol Commander.
The Coast Guard Patrol Commander is
a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Commanding Officer,
Coast Guard Sector Miami, Florida.
(b) Special Local Regulations. Vessels
and persons are prohibited from
entering the regulated race area, unless
they are race participants or authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander.
Spectator craft may enter the regulated
viewing area upon authorization of the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander. If entry
is authorized, all persons must follow
the instructions of the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander.
(c) Effective Period: This rule is
effective from 10 a.m. until 5 p.m. on
July 17, 2005.
Dated: March 3, 2005.
W.E. Justice,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–5336 Filed 3–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:20 Mar 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
[R05–OAR–2005–OH–0001; FRL–7886–8]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Ohio
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
Ohio’s March 1, 2005, submittal of a
revision to the Clinton County 1-Hour
ozone maintenance plan under the
Clean Air Act. This maintenance plan
revision establishes a new
transportation conformity motor vehicle
emissions budget (MVEB) for the area
for the year 2006. EPA is proposing to
approve the allocation of a portion of
the safety margin for oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) to the area’s 2006 MVEB for
transportation conformity purposes.
This allocation will still maintain the
total emissions for the area at or below
the attainment level required by the
transportation conformity regulations.
The transportation conformity budget
for volatile organic compounds will
remain the same as previously approved
in the maintenance plan. In this action,
EPA is also correcting the codification
for a previous approval action for
Cincinnati, Ohio.
In the final rules section of this
Federal Register, EPA is approving the
SIP revision as a direct final rule
without prior proposal, because EPA
views this as a noncontroversial
revision and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If we do not receive any adverse
comments in response to these direct
final and proposed rules, we do not
contemplate taking any further action in
relation to this proposed rule. If EPA
receives adverse comments, we will
withdraw the direct final rule and will
respond to all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 18, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID No. R05–OAR–2005–
OH–0001 by one of the following
methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key
in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
Fax: (312) 886–5824.
Mail: You may send written
comments to: John Mooney, Chief,
Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
Hand delivery: Deliver your
comments to: John Mooney, Chief,
Criteria Pollutant Section (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office’s normal
hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
RME ID No. R05–OAR–2005–OH–0001.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through RME, regulations.gov,
or e-mail. The EPA RME Web site and
the Federal regulations.gov Web site are
‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through RME or
regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 52 (Friday, March 18, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13122-13124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5336]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 52 / Friday, March 18, 2005 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 13122]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD07-05-015]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations; Dania Beach/Hollywood Super Boat Race,
Dania Beach/Hollywood, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary special
local regulation for the Dania Beach/Hollywood Super Boat Race offshore
in Dania Beach/Hollywood, Florida. These special local regulations
restrict the movement of non-participating vessels and persons in the
regulated race area and provide a viewing area for spectator craft.
This rule is needed to provide for the safety of life on navigable
waters during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before May 17, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to: Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Miami, 100 MacArthur Causeway, Miami Beach, Fl 33139
Attn: BMC R. Terrell or BMC D. Vaughn. Sector Miami Deck/ATON maintains
the public docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material received
from the public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, will become part of this docket and will
be available for inspection or copying at Coast Guard Sector Miami, 100
MacArthur Causeway, Miami Beach, Florida between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Boatswain's Mate Chief Richard Terrell
or Boatswain's Mate Chief Daniel Vaughn, at (305) 535-4317.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking CGD07-05-
015, indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Miami at the address under ADDRESSES explaining why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Background and Purpose
Super Boat International Productions Inc. is sponsoring a high-
speed power boat race event on July 17, 2005, from 10 a.m. until 5 p.m.
in the Atlantic Ocean offshore from Dania Beach/Hollywood, Florida. The
race organizers anticipate 35 race participants and 100 spectator
craft. The event will take place outside of the marked channel and will
not interfere with commercial shipping. Recreational and fishing
vessels normally operate in the area that will be affected by the
establishment of a special local regulation. This rule is required to
provide for the safety of life on navigable waters, due to the dangers
associated with power boat races. The proposed rule prohibits non-
participating vessels and persons from entering the regulated race
areas during the event. A Coast Guard Patrol Commander will be present
during the event to monitor compliance with this regulation.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This rule creates two regulated areas, a regulated race area and a
regulated viewing area (regulated areas). These regulated areas provide
for the safety of life on navigable waters and minimize the dangers
associated with powerboat races. These dangers include race craft
traveling at high speeds in close proximity to race participants,
spectator craft. This regulation keeps event participants, spectator
craft and recreational vessels at a safe distance from one another.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
The proposed rule affects a limited area offshore of Dania Beach/
Hollywood, Florida and will be effective for only 7 hours on July 17,
2005, specifically from 10 a.m. until 5 p.m.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule may affect the following entities,
some of which may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the Atlantic
[[Page 13123]]
Ocean near Dania Beach/Hollywood, Florida from 10 a.m. until 5 p.m. on
July 17, 2005. The Coast Guard certifies under U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, because this rule would be in effect for only
7 hours. The rule also regulates a small area, and commercial and
recreational vessels may be allowed to transit through the zone between
races with permission of the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Moreover,
all vessel traffic can pass safely around the regulated areas. Before
the effective period, we will issue maritime advisories over VHF-FM
radio to allow the maritime community to plan accordingly.
If you think your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT for assistance in understanding and
participating in this rulemaking. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule should be categorically excluded,
under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because this regulation is a special local
regulation issued in conjunction with an organized water event of
limited duration. Under Figure 2-1, Paragraph 34(h), an ``Environmental
Analysis Check List'' and a final ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we make the final decision on whether
the rule should be categorically excluded from further environmental
review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
[[Page 13124]]
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary Sec. 100.35T-07-021 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35T-07-021 Dania Beach/Hollywood Super Boat Race; Dania
Beach/Hollywood, Florida.
(a) Definitions. (1) Regulated race area. The regulated race area
encompasses all waters located inside of a line connecting the
following positions offshore of Dania Beach/Hollywood, Florida:
Point 1: 26[deg]03'41'' N, 080[deg]05'01'' W
Point 2: 26[deg]03'41'' N, 080[deg]06'23'' W
Point 3: 26[deg]00'07'' N, 080[deg]05'36'' W
Point 4: 26[deg]00'10'' N, 080[deg]06'50'' W
All coordinates referenced use Datum: NAD 1983.
(2) Regulated viewing area. The regulated viewing area for
spectator craft encompasses all waters located within a line connecting
the following positions offshore Dania Beach/Hollywood, Florida;
Point 1: 26[deg]03'41'' N, 080[deg]05'30'' W
Point 2: 26[deg]03'41'' N, 080[deg]05'01'' W
Point 3: 26[deg]00'07'' N, 080[deg]05'56'' W
Point 4: 26[deg]00'07'' N, 080[deg]05'36'' W
All coordinates referenced use Datum NAD: 1983.
(3) Coast Guard Patrol Commander. The Coast Guard Patrol Commander
is a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the Coast Guard who has
been designated by the Commanding Officer, Coast Guard Sector Miami,
Florida.
(b) Special Local Regulations. Vessels and persons are prohibited
from entering the regulated race area, unless they are race
participants or authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander.
Spectator craft may enter the regulated viewing area upon authorization
of the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. If entry is authorized, all
persons must follow the instructions of the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander.
(c) Effective Period: This rule is effective from 10 a.m. until 5
p.m. on July 17, 2005.
Dated: March 3, 2005.
W.E. Justice,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Seventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 05-5336 Filed 3-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P