Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Authorization for Continued Project Operation, 12862-12863 [E5-1152]

Download as PDF 12862 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Comment Date: March 24, 2005. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–1147 Filed 3–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket Nos. CP05–83–000, CP05–84–000, CP05–85–000, and CP05–86–000] Port Arthur LNG, L.P. and Port Arthur Pipeline, L.P.; Notice of Applications March 10, 2005. Take notice that on February 28, 2005, Port Arthur LNG, L.P. (Port Arthur LNG) filed an application in Docket No. CP05–83–000 seeking authorization to site, construct and operate a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal and associated facilities to import and deliver up to 1.5 Bcf per day of natural gas during Phase I, increasing to 3.0 Bcf per day during Phase II. The terminal and associated facilities will be located in the City of Port Arthur, Texas and in Jefferson County, Texas. The LNG terminal will provide LNG tanker terminal services to third party shippers who would be importing LNG from foreign sources. Port Arthur LNG made the request to site, construct and operate the LNG terminal pursuant to section 3(a) of the Natural Gas Act and Part 153 of the Commission’s regulations. Also, take notice that on February 28, 2005, Port Arthur Pipeline, L.P. (Port Arthur Pipeline) filed in Docket No. CP05–84–000, an application seeking a certificate of public convenience and necessity, pursuant to section 7(c) of the NGA and Part 157, Subpart A of the Commission’s regulations, to construct VerDate jul<14>2003 16:45 Mar 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 and operate a 70-mile pipeline leg and a 3-mile pipeline leg and related facilities to transport natural gas on an open access basis. In Docket No. CP05– 85–000, Port Arthur Pipeline requests a blanket certificate under section 7(c) of the NGA and Part 157, Subpart F of the Commission’s regulations to perform routine activities in connection with the future construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed pipeline. Finally, Port Arthur Pipeline requests authorization in Docket No. CP05–86– 000 to provide the natural gas transportation services on a firm and interruptible basis pursuant to section 7(c) of the NGA and Part 284 of the Commission’s regulations. These applications are on file with the Commission and open to public inspection. These filings are available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission’s Web site at https://www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY, contact (202) 502–8659. In Docket No. PF04–11–000, Port Arthur LNG and Port Arthur Pipeline participated in a pre-filing National Environmental Policy Act review of the proposed project to identify and resolve potential landowner and environmental problems before the applications were filed. Any initial questions regarding these applications should be directed to Georgetta J. Baker, Sempara Energy , 101 Ash Street, HQ13D, San Diego, California 92101, Phone: (619) 699– 5064, Fax: (619) 699–5027 or gbaker@sempra.com or Stacy Van Goor, Sempra Energy, 101 Ash Street, HQ8, San Diego, California 92101, Phone: (619) 696–2264, Fax: (619) 696–2500 or svangoor@sempraglobal.com. There are two ways to become involved in the Commission’s review of this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or before the comment date, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 will receive copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the proceeding. Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of this project, or in support of or in opposition to this project, should submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be placed on the Commission’s environmental mailing list, will receive copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings associated with the Commission’s environmental review process. Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed documents on all other parties. The Commission’s rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project provide copies of their protests only to the applicant. However, the non-party commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court review of the Commission’s final order. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, protests, and interventions via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission’s Web site under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. Comment Date: March 31, 2005. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–1146 Filed 3–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 382] Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Authorization for Continued Project Operation March 10, 2005. On February 26, 2003, Southern California Edison Company, licensee for the Borel Project No. 382, filed an application for a new or subsequent license pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the Commission’s E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices regulations thereunder. Project No. 382 is located on the Kern River in Kern County, California. The license for Project No. 382 was issued for a period ending February 28, 2005. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year to year an annual license to the then licensee under the terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project’s prior license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project. If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 382 is issued to Southern California Edison Company for a period effective March 1, 2005 through February 28, 2006, or until the issuance of a new license for the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place on or before March 1, 2006, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is renewed automatically without further order or notice by the Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise. If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is hereby given that Southern California Edison Company is authorized to continue operation of the Borel Project No. 382 until such time as the Commission acts on its application for subsequent license. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–1152 Filed 3–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P VerDate jul<14>2003 16:45 Mar 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 12863 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on March 23, 2005. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 3. FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC [Docket No. EG05–35–000, et al.] [Docket No. ER02–1838–004] 1. SeaWest WindPower, Inc. Take notice that on February 25, 2005, FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC submitted a request to increase prior authorization to sell energy, capacity and ancillary services at market-based rates. FPL Energy Seabrook LLC states that copies of the filing were served upon the Florida Public Service Commission. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on March 18, 2005. [Docket No. EG05–35–000] 4. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. SeaWest WindPower, Inc., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings March 9, 2005. The following filings have been made with the Commission. The filings are listed in ascending order within each docket classification. On March 4, 2005, SeaWest WindPower, Inc. (SeaWest WindPower), located at 1455 Frazee Road, Ninth Floor, San Diego, California, 92108, filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an amended application for determination of exempt wholesale generator (EWG) status pursuant to part 365 of the Commission’s regulations. SeaWest WindPower states it will be engaged directly and exclusively in the business of operating certain eligible facilities and selling electric energy exclusively at wholesale within the meaning of section 32(a) of PUHCA. SeaWest WindPower requests that the Commission determine that it is an EWG as it is currently owned and after consummation of the sale of 100 percent of the capital stock of its parent, SeaWest Holdings, Inc., to a whollyowned subsidiary of the AES Corporation, AES Western Wind, LLC. SeaWest WindPower states that a copy of the amended application has been served on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the California Public Utilities Commission, the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, the Oregon Public Utility Commission, and the Wyoming Public Service Commission. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on March 22, 2005. 2. California Independent System Operator Corporation [Docket Nos. ER98–997–006, ER98–1309– 005, ER02–2297–005, and ER02–2298–005] Take notice that on March 2, 2005, the California Independent System Operator Corporation (ISO) submitted a filing in compliance with the Commission’s Order issued February 11, 2005, 110 FERC ¶ 61,122. The ISO states that this filing has been served on all parties on the official service lists for the above-captioned dockets. In addition, the ISO states that the filing has been posted on the ISO Home Page. PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [Docket No. ER04–608–003] Take notice that on February 28, 2005, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) submitted for filing an updated status report of PJM’s stakeholder process regarding expansion of PJM’s behind the meter generation program to include generation associated with municipals’ and cooperatives’ electric distribution systems, originally filed on January 3, 2005, in Docket No. ER04–608–002. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on March 21, 2005. 5. Upper Peninsula Power Company [Docket No. ER05–89–002] Take notice that on March 2, 2005, Upper Peninsula Power Company (UPPCO) tendered for filing a Supplement to market-based rate application in preparation for MISO Day-2 Market Operations FILED ON January 4, 2005 in Docket No. ER05–89– 001. UPPCO states that copies of the filing were served upon the official service list, PJM, MISO and the Michigan Public Service Commission. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on March 14, 2005. 6. Southwest Power Pool, Inc. [Docket No. ER05–490–001] Take notice that on March 7, 2005, Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) submitted for filing an amendment to an executed service agreement for Firm Point-To-Point Transmission Service with Southwestern Public Service Company (Southwestern) previously filed with the Commission in Docket No. ER05–490–000 on January 26, 2005. SPP seeks an effective date of January 1, 2005, for the service agreement. SPP states that Southwestern was served with a copy of this filing. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on March 16, 2005. E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12862-12863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1152]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 382]


Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

March 10, 2005.
    On February 26, 2003, Southern California Edison Company, licensee 
for the Borel Project No. 382, filed an application for a new or 
subsequent license pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the 
Commission's

[[Page 12863]]

regulations thereunder. Project No. 382 is located on the Kern River in 
Kern County, California.
    The license for Project No. 382 was issued for a period ending 
February 28, 2005. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year to year an annual license to the then licensee under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), 
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project 
has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 382 is issued to 
Southern California Edison Company for a period effective March 1, 2005 
through February 28, 2006, or until the issuance of a new license for 
the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. 
If issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place 
on or before March 1, 2006, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 
CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Southern California Edison Company is authorized to 
continue operation of the Borel Project No. 382 until such time as the 
Commission acts on its application for subsequent license.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-1152 Filed 3-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.