American Electric Power Service Corporation; PJM Interconnection, LLC and Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.; Notice Instituting Section 206 Proceeding and Establishing Effective Refund Date, 12860-12861 [E5-1148]

Download as PDF 12860 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices industry sectors designated as owners and operators of ‘‘critical infrastructure’’ under HSPD–7 to receive, submit, share and collaborate on information pertaining to incidents, threats, vulnerabilities and infrastructure security. HSIN will be financed by DHS and controlled by the industry sectors. HSIN runs on a highly secure backbone network, and includes the following components: (a) Industry sector portals with the ability to report incidents via secure protocol, post community updates and store sensitive documents; (b) Collaboration Tools enabling members to engage in real-time dialogue around planning and response to incidents; and (c) Broadcasting/ Narrowcasting of alerts, threats and warnings. The proposed reporting process is intended to reduce duplicative reporting and establish a common reporting format by providing another option on how the Form EEA– 417 can be filed with DOE. As this concept is developed, the status will be addressed in future informational releases or Federal Register notices. (5) Confidentiality DOE will treat the entire narrative on Form EEA–417, Schedule 2, as confidential. The requested information will provide a brief description of the incident or expected system problem, names of facilities affected, and actions taken to resolve it. If released, this could affect the economic operations of various electricity markets; cause competitive harm; and/or identify concerns that could be or are being reviewed by law enforcement agencies. Contact information for a respondent will continue to be treated as confidential (Lines 4–9 of Schedule 1). This includes the proposed Line 9 covering teleconferencing/video contact information. The following is the provision for confidentiality of information for data in the possession of DOE that will be applied to the data submitted in the narrative in Schedule 2. The information reported on Form EEA–417 will be kept confidential and not disclosed to the public to the extent that it satisfies the criteria for exemption under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, the DOE regulations, 10 CFR 1004.11, implementing the FOIA, and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. 1905. The DOE will protect your information in accordance with its confidentiality and security policies and procedures. The Federal Energy Administration Act requires the DOE to provide company-specific data to other Federal agencies when requested for official use. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:45 Mar 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 The information reported on this form may also be made available, upon request, to another component of the DOE; to any Committee of Congress, the General Accounting Office, or other Federal agencies authorized by law to receive such information. A court of competent jurisdiction may obtain this information in response to an order. The information may be used for any nonstatistical purposes such as administrative, regulatory, law enforcement, or adjudicatory purposes. Officials in the Critical Infrastructure Protection Branch of the Department of Homeland Security have requested access to the EEA–417 submissions. III. Request for Comments Prospective respondents and other interested parties should comment on the actions discussed in item II. The following guidelines are provided to assist in the preparation of comments. General Issues: A. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency and does the information have practical utility? Practical utility is defined as the actual usefulness of information to or for an agency, taking into account its accuracy, adequacy, reliability, timeliness, and the agency’s ability to process the information it collects. B. What enhancements can be made to the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected? As a potential respondent to the request for information: A. Are the instructions and definitions clear and sufficient? If not, which instructions need clarification? B. Can the information be submitted by the due date? C. Public reporting burden for this collection is estimated to average 10 minutes for the Emergency Incident Report (Schedule 1, Part A) that is to be filed within 1 hour; the overall public reporting burden for the form is estimated at 2 hours to cover any detailed reporting in the Normal/Update Report (Schedule 1, Part B and Schedule 2) that would be filed later (up to 48 hours), if required. In your opinion, how accurate is this estimate? D. The agency estimates that the only cost to a respondent is for the time it will take to complete the collection. Will a respondent incur any start-up costs for reporting, or any recurring annual costs for operation, maintenance, and purchase of services associated with the information collection? E. What additional actions could be taken to minimize the burden of this collection of information? Such actions PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 may involve the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. F. Does any other Federal, State, or local agency collect similar information? If so, specify the agency, the data element(s), and the methods of collection. G. Is the proposed treatment for narrative information as confidential appropriate? Is it appropriate for another data element? If so, then specify the data element(s) and provide an explanation for the proposed confidential status. Is the delayed release of information effective in addressing competitive market concerns? As a potential user of the information to be collected: A. Is the information useful at the levels of detail to be collected? B. For what purpose(s) would the information be used? Be specific. C. Are there alternate sources for the information and are they useful? If so, what are their weaknesses and/or strengths? Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of the form. They also will become a matter of public record. Statutory Authority: Section 3507(h)(1) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Issued in Washington, DC, March 10, 2005. Jay H. Casselberry, Agency Clearance Officer, Energy Information Administration. [FR Doc. 05–5184 Filed 3–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket Nos. ER05–31–000, ER05–31–001, and EL05–70–000] American Electric Power Service Corporation; PJM Interconnection, LLC and Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.; Notice Instituting Section 206 Proceeding and Establishing Effective Refund Date March 10, 2005. On March 9, 2005, the Commission issued an order in the above-referenced dockets instituting a proceeding in Docket No. EL05–70–000 under section 206 of the Federal Power Act. The refund effective date in Docket No. EL05–70–000, established pursuant E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 16, 2005 / Notices to section 206 of the Federal Power Act, will be 60 days following publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–1148 Filed 3–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP05–82–000] El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Application March 10, 2005. Take notice that El Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso), Post Office Box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80944, filed in Docket No. CP05–82–000 on February 28, 2005, an application pursuant to section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and the Commission’s Regulations, for authorization to abandon in place El Paso’s Gila Compressor Station facilities, with appurtenances, located in Maricopa County, Arizona. El Paso states that this station which yields approximately 17,100 horsepower has become functionally obsolete and is no longer required in its natural gas service, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection. This filing may be also viewed on the web at https://www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call (202) 502–8659 or TTY, (202) 208–3676. Any questions regarding this application should be directed to Robert T. Tomlinson, Director, Regulatory Affairs, El Paso Natural Gas Company, P.O. Box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80944, at (719) 520–3788 or fax (719) 520–4318. There are two ways to become involved in the Commission’s review of this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on the service list VerDate jul<14>2003 16:45 Mar 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the proceeding. However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project. The Commission will consider these comments in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission’s rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly involved in the protest. Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be placed on the Commission’s environmental mailing list, will receive copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings associated with the Commission’s environmental review process. Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court review of the Commission’s final order. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission’s Web site under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. Comment Date: March 31, 2005. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–1159 Filed 3–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12861 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP05–87–000] Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline, L.P.; Notice of Application for Blanket Certificate and Petition for Rate Review March 10, 2005. Take notice that on March 2, 2005, Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline, L.P. (KMNTP) pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. 717(f)(c), and section 284.224 of the Commission’s regulations, 18 CFR 284.224, KMNTP, a Texas Hinshaw pipeline company that is not subject to the jurisdiction of FERC, applies for a blanket certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing interruptible transportation of natural gas in interstate commerce to the same extent and in the same manner that intrastate pipelines are authorized to engage in such activities, transactions and services pursuant to Subparts C and D of Part 284 of the Commission’s regulations. KMNTP’s corporate office is located in Houston, Texas and it is subject to the jurisdiction of the Railroad Commission of Texas. KMNTP is a Delaware partnership owned by Kinder Morgan Tejas Pipeline GP, LLC and Tejas Energy Partner, LLC. These two entities are subsidiaries of Tejas Natural Gas, LLC, which is a subsidiary of Tejas Gas, LLC. The ultimate parent of KMNTP is Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. KMNTP currently provides services to one customer in the State of Texas. The pipeline’s construction like its current operations is under the authority of the Railroad Commission of Texas. Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12860-12861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER05-31-000, ER05-31-001, and EL05-70-000]


American Electric Power Service Corporation; PJM Interconnection, 
LLC and Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.; Notice 
Instituting Section 206 Proceeding and Establishing Effective Refund 
Date

March 10, 2005.
    On March 9, 2005, the Commission issued an order in the above-
referenced dockets instituting a proceeding in Docket No. EL05-70-000 
under section 206 of the Federal Power Act.
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL05-70-000, established 
pursuant

[[Page 12861]]

to section 206 of the Federal Power Act, will be 60 days following 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-1148 Filed 3-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.