Tysa Management, d/b/a Osmani Lucky Wholesale; Denial of Application, 12732-12734 [05-5068]
Download as PDF
12732
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 15, 2005 / Notices
compliance with the law and expressed
willingness to comply with regulations
and attempt to guard against diversion
are far outweighed by her intent to sell
ephedrine and pseudoephedrine almost
exclusively, in the gray market.
This reasoning has been consistently
applied by the Deputy Administrator in
a series of recently published final
orders denying registration to potential
gray market distributors. See, Volusia
Wholesale, 69 FR 69,409 (2004); CWK
Enterprises, Inc., 69 FR 69,400 (2004); J
& S Distributors, 69 FR 62,089 (2004);
Express Wholesale, supra, 69 FR 62,086;
Absolute Distributing, Inc., 69 FR
62,078 (2004); Value Wholesale, 69 FR
58,548 (2004); John E. McRae d/b/a J &
H Wholesale, 69 FR 51,480 (2004).
Based on the foregoing, the Deputy
Administrator concludes that granting
Respondent’s pending application
would be inconsistent with the public
interest.
Accordingly, the Deputy
Administrator of the Drug Enforcement
Administration, pursuant to the
authority vested in her by 21 U.S.C. 823
and 28 CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104, hereby
orders that the pending application for
a DEA Certificate of Registration,
previously submitted by TNT
Distributors, Inc., be, and it hereby is,
denied. This order is effective April 14,
2005.
Dated: February 14, 2005.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–5069 Filed 3–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Tysa Management, d/b/a Osmani Lucky
Wholesale; Denial of Application
On July 23, 2004, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), issued an Order
to Show Cause to Mr. Ty Osmani,
President, Tysa Management, d.b.a.
Osmani Lucky Wholesale (hereinafter
referred to as ‘‘OLW’’) proposing to
deny its application executed on
October 15, 2003, for DEA Certificate of
Registration as a distributor of list I
chemicals. The Order to Show Cause
alleged that granting the application of
OLW would be inconsistent with the
public interest as that term is used in 21
U.S.C. 823(h).
According to the DEA investigative
file, the Order to Show Cause was sent
by certified mail to OLW at its proposed
registered location in Denison, Texas
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:31 Mar 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
and was received on August 2, 2004.
According to the investigative file, DEA
received a letter from Tysa Osmani (Mr.
Osmani) dated August 20, 2004, waiving
the applicant’s right to a hearing and
requesting that the firm be issued a
registration to distribute ephedrine.
Accordingly, the Deputy
Administrator finds that OLW has
waived its hearing right. See, Aqui
Enterprises, 67 Fed. Reg. 12567 (2002).
After considering relevant material from
the investigative file in this matter, the
Deputy Administrator now enters her
final order without a hearing pursuant
to 21 CFR 1309.53(b) and (d). The
Deputy Administrator finds as follows:
List I chemicals are those that may be
used in the manufacture of a controlled
substance in violation of the Controlled
Substances Act. 21 U.S.C. 802(34); 21
CFR 1310.02(a). As noted in previous
DEA final orders, Pseudoephedrine and
ephedrine are list I chemicals
commonly used to illegally manufacture
methamphetamine, a Schedule II
controlled substance .
Methamphetamine is an extremely
potent central nervous system stimulant
and its illicit manufacture and abuse are
ongoing public health concerns in the
United States. See e.g., Direct
Wholesale, 67 FR 11, 654 (2004); Yemen
Wholesale Tobacco and Candy Supply,
Inc., 67 FR 9,997 (2002); Denver
Wholesale, 67 FR 99,986 (2002).
On April 6, 2004, the State of
Oklahoma enacted House Bill 2176.
Among its provisions, the newly
enacted legislation has designated
pseudoephedrine tables as a Schedule V
controlled substance under Oklahoma
law. This provision further mandates
that pseudoephedrine tablets sold only
from licensed pharmacies and requires
customers seeking to purchase this
product to present photo identifications
and sign for their purchases. As a result,
it is presently prohibited under
Oklahoma law for persons to sell
pseudoephedrine tables from
convenience stores or other nonpharmacy locations.
The Deputy Administrator’s review of
the investigative file reveals that on
October 15, 2003, Mr. Osmani submitted
an application for DEA Registration on
behalf of OLW. OLW sought DEA
registration as a distributor of the list I
chemicals ephedrine and
pseudoephedrine. OLW is a Limited
Liability Corporation which became
incorporated in Texas on October 23,
2003, and Mr. Osmani and his wife are
the company’s only employees.
On November 13, 2003, DEA
diversion investigators conducted an
on-site preregistration inspection at
OLW’s proposed registered location in
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Denison, Texas. The location requested
by OLW as a DEA-registered premise
was a former gas station establishment.
DEA’s investigation revealed that in
addition to its proposed registered
location, Mr. Osmani owns the
following Denison-area convenience
stores. Lucky Liquor & Discount
Tobacco; Lucky Stop #2; and, Lucky
Stop #4. Mr. Osmani is also the owner
of two Lucky Stop convenience stores
located in Cartwright and Durant,
Oklahoma. DEA’s investigation revealed
that as of January 2004, Cartwirght,
Oklahoma had an estimated population
of 13,549. Each of Mr. Osmani’s stores
sell typical convenience store items
including tobacco products, candy,
automobile maintenance products and
T-shirts.
Mr. Owmani informed DEA
investigators that he would operate as a
wholesale distributor to his five
convenience stores, which he identified
as his only customers. He further
discussed plans to distribute certain
listed chemical products, including
Mini-Thin ephedrine tablets in sixcount packets and 60-count bottles, as
well as Max Brand pseudoephedrine
products, also in six-count packets and
60-count bottles. Mr. Osmani estimated
that these products would make up five
to fifteen percent of OLW’s total sales.
Mr. Osmani further informed DEA
investigators that OLW did not own any
deliver trucks and employees from the
two Oklahoma convenience stores
would drive to OLW’s Denison location
to pick up list I chemical products for
delivery to the Oklahoma business
establishment.
According to the investigative file, as
of July 1, 2003, distributors of
pseudoephedrine products conducting
business in Oklahoma were required to
obtain a registration with the Director of
the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and
Dangerous Drugs Control (the Bureau).
63 O.S. 2001, Section 2–302. DEA’s
investigation has revealed that as of
January 7, 2004, neither Mr. Osmani nor
OLW were registered with the Bureau to
handle pseudoephedrine.
During the aforementioned onsite
inspection by DEA, Mr. Osmani also
informed investigators that his suppliers
for listed chemicals were Silver Star and
Import Warehouse, Incorporated, both
of Dallas, Texas. However, when DEA
investigators conducted verification
checks with OLW’s proposed suppliers
on November 17, 2003, the owner of
Import Warehouse stated that he would
not be supplying listed chemicals
products to OLW; and, the owner of
Silver Star informed DEA personnel that
he had planned to supply only
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 15, 2005 / Notices
ephedrine to OLW and not
pseudoephedrine.
On November 19, 2003, DEA
investigators requested purchase records
from the two aforementioned
establishments. The owner of Import
Warehouse provided purchase records
dating from May 23, 1998 to September
27, 2000, for sales of listed chemicals to
two of Mr. Osmani’s Denison-area
convenience stores (Lucky Stop #2 and
Lucky Stop #4). The records revealed
that with the exception of July and
August, 1998, Mr. Osmani ordered fortyeight, 60-count bottles of Mini 2 Way
200mg. Guaifenesin nearly every month
during the above time period. In
addition, Mr. Osmani ordered four cases
(144 bottles per case) of Max Alert
Pseudo (pseudoephedrine) 60-count in
July 1998. One month later, Mr. Osmani
ordered an additional 192 bottles of Max
Alert Pseudo.
The owner of Silver Star also
provided purchase records dating from
April 24, 2001 to August 28, 2003, for
the sale of listed chemical products to
two of Mr. Osmani’s Denison-area
convenience stores (Lucky Liquor &
discount Tobacco and Lucky Stop #4).
The records revealed that on eleven
separate occasions from November 8,
2001 to August 28, 2003, Mr. Osmani
ordered a case (144 bottles per case) of
200-count Guaifensin 12.5mg; in April
2001 and again in November 2002, Mr.
Osmani purchased 288 bottles of this
product; on April 19, 2003, Mr. Osmani
purchased 72 (60-count) bottles of Max
Brand 2-Way ephedrine.
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(h), the
Deputy Administrator may deny an
application for Certificate of
Registration if she determines that
granting the registration would be
inconsistent with the public interest as
determined under that section. Section
823(h) requires the following factors be
considered in determining the public
interest:
(1) Maintenance of effective controls
against diversion of listed chemicals
into other than legitimate channels;
(2) Compliance with applicable
Federal, State, and local law;
(3) Any prior conviction record under
Federal or State laws relating to
controlled substances or to chemicals
controlled under Federal or State law;
(4) Any past experience in the
manufacture and distribution of
chemicals; and
(5) Such other factors as are relevant
to and consistent with the public health
and safety.
As with the public interest analysis
for practitioners and pharmacies
pursuant to subsection (f) of section 823,
these factors are to be considered in the
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:31 Mar 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
disjunctive; the Deputy Administrator
may rely on any one or combination of
factors, and may give each factor the
weight she deems appropriate in
determining whether a registration
should be revoked or an application for
registration denied. See, e.g., ANM
Wholesale, 69 FR 11,652 (2004); Energy
Outlet, 64 FR 14269 (1999). See also
Henry J. Schwartz, Jr., M.D., 54 FR
16,422 (1989).
The Deputy Administrator finds
factors one, two, four and five relevant
to OLW’s pending registration
application.
With regard to factor one,
maintenance of effective controls
against diversion of listed chemicals
into other than legitimate channels, the
Deputy Administrator finds substantial
evidence in the investigative file that
OLW, through its owner Ty Osmani, has
participated in the unlawful diversion
of pseudoephedrine having reasonable
cause to believe that it would be used
to manufacture illicit
methamphetamine. Mr. Osmani has
purchased large quantities of
pseudoephedrine and ephedrine
products and distributed these products
through his convenience stores located
in Texas and Oklahoma. Prior to 2004,
these areas have been known for their
numerous seizures involving
clandestine methamphetamine
laboratories. In most instances, the
primary sources for the diversion of
these products are convenience stores
and other ‘‘non-traditional retailers of
over-the-counter drug products.’’ AlAlousi, Inc., 70 FR 3561 (2005). See,
Sinbad Distribution, 67 FR 10232, 10233
(2002). Therefore, factor one weights
against the granting of OLW’s pending
application for registration.
With regard to factor two, compliance
with applicable Federal, State, and local
law, DEA’s pre-registrant inspection
revealed that as of July 1, 2003,
distributors of pseudoephedrine
products conducting business in
Oklahoma were required to register with
the state Bureau of Narcotics and
Dangerous Drugs Control (the Bureau)
pursuant to 63 O.S. 2001, Section 2–
302. Mr. Osmani and OLW’s failure to
obtain state registration to handle listed
chemicals is relevant under factor two,
and also weighs against the granting of
the pending application for registration.
With regard to factor four, past
experience in the manufacture and
distribution of chemicals, and factor
five, such other factors relevant to and
consistent with the public safety, the
Deputy Administrator finds these
factors relevant to Mr. Osmani and
OLW’s purchase of quantities of listed
chemical products for distribution to,
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12733
and sale by his convenience stores in
Texas and Oklahoma. These listed
chemical products were for the most
part, purchased by OLW on a monthly
basis and appeared to be far in excess
of the expected demand for such
products. As noted in previous final
orders, while there are no specific
prohibitions under the Controlled
Substance Act regarding the sale of
listed chemical products to these
entities, DEA has nevertheless found
that convenience stores constitute
sources for the diversion of listed
chemical products. Sinbad Distributing,
supra at 10233; K.V.M. Enterprises, 67
FR 70968 (2002) (denial of application
based in part upon information
developed by DEA that the applicant
proposed to sell listed chemicals to gas
stations, and the fact that these
establishments in turn have sold listed
chemical products to individuals
engaged in the illicit manufacture of
methamphetamine).
DEA has found persuasive, expert
testimony in the area of statistical
analysis of convenience stores and their
sale of pseudoephedrine. Branex, Inc.,
69 FR 8,682 (2004); Express Wholesale,
69 FR 62086, 62088 (2004). In analyzing
the expected sale of listed chemical
products in the State of Oklahoma, a
consultant in marketing information and
databases offered expert testimony
through the use of the 1997 United
States Economic Census of Retail Trade
and tabulated data which indicated that
‘‘over 97% of all sales of nonprescription drug products,’’ including
non-prescription cough, cold and nasal
congestion remedies, occur in drug
stores and pharmacies, supermarkets,
large discount merchandisers, mailorder houses and through electronic
shopping. The markeing consultant
characterized these five retail industries
as ‘‘the traditional marketplace where
such goods are purchased by ordinary
customers.’’ Express Wholesale, supra.
The market consultant also analyzed
national data specific to the sale of overthe-counter, non-prescription drugs
containing pseudoephedrine by
convenience stores which he
characterized as a ‘‘nontraditional
market’’ for the sale of listed chemical
products. He further determined ‘‘* * *
that a very small percentage of the sales
of such goods occur in convenience
stores—only about 2.6% of the HABC
[Health and Beauty Care] category of
merchandise or 0.05% of total in-store
(non-gasoline) sales.’’ The marketing
consultant concluded that ‘‘[c]onveniece
stores, therefore, definitely constitute a
‘non-traditional’ market for the sale of
over-the-counter, non-prescription drug
pesudoephedrine products.’’
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
12734
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 15, 2005 / Notices
The marketing consultant further
explained that this information
support’s DEA’s conclusion that
pseudoephedrine products distributed
to this nontraditional market greatly
exceeded the normal demand for such
products at such retail outlets. He
agreed that such excessive sales could
be purchases of listed chemical
products that were diverted to illicit
uses. With respect to Oklahoma
wholesale pseudoephedrine sales of
several distributors and over 300 of their
retail customers, all of which were
convenience stores, a July 2002 analysis
by the marketing consultant led to the
conclusion ‘‘that without evidence of
the existence of immense numbers of
legitimate customers, it was likely that
the massive inventories of
pseudoephedrine products purchased
by these Oklahoma stores were being
turned to illegal uses.’’ Express
Wholesale, supra.
With respect to the instant matter, Mr.
Osmani and OLW have similarly
amassed large quantities of
pseudoephedrine and ephedrine
products. The frequency and quantity of
listed chemicals purchased by OLW
from 1998 to 2003 defined all available
and conventional marketing data for the
expected sale of these products. Given
the demonstrated lack of legitimate
demand for these products when sold
from convenience stores, the Deputy
Administrator is left with the
conclusion that Mr. Osmani and OLW
purchased pseudoephedrine and
ephedrine products for sale to
individuals involved in the illicit
manufacture of methamphetamine.
As noted above, effective April 6,
2004, Oklahoma enacted House Bill
2176, titled the ‘‘Oklahoma
Methamphetamine Reduction Act of
2004.’’ This provision includes the
requirement that the sale of
pseudoephedrine tablets are now
restricted to licensed pharmacies. As in
a prior DEA final order, the Deputy
Administrator finds in the instant
matter that OLW’s proposed distribution
of listed chemicals through its
convenience stores is no longer legally
viable in Oklahoma. See, Express
Wholesale, supra at 62089.
A review of early data for 2004 reveals
that the newly enacted laws have
resulted in an apparent reduction in the
number of seizures involving
clandestine methamphetamine labs in
Oklahoma. These developments in
Oklahoma are encouraging and
represent another important step in the
ongoing battle to curb
methamphetamine abuse in the United
States. In keeping with this positive
trend, DEA must also act in an
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:31 Mar 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
appropriate fashion to ensure that listed
chemicals are not diverted. The Deputy
Administrator notes that while Mr.
Osmani and OLW seek DEA registration
in the State of Texas, the company also
seeks to distribute listed chemicals from
convenience stores located in
Oklahoma. Based solely on the
population statistics of Cartwright and
Durant, Oklahoma, it would appear at
first glance that the market for over-thecounter drug products in these cities is
relatively insignificant. However, as the
record before the Deputy Administrator
clearly demonstrates, the relatively
small size of the Oklahoma markets
serviced by OLW is not a significant
factor since Mr. Osmani appears intent
on purchasing extraordinarily large
quantities of listed chemical products
without regard to market size. These
purchasing practices indicate that OLW
would willingly accommodate persons
involved in the illicit methamphetamine
trade. Based on the foregoing, the
Deputy Administrator concludes that
granting the pending application of
OLW would be inconsistent with the
public interest.
Accordingly, the Deputy
Administrator of the Drug Enforcement
Administration, pursuant to the
authority vested in her by 21 U.S.C. 823
and 28 CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104, hereby
orders that the pending application for
DEA Certificate of Registration,
previously submitted by Tysa
Management, d.b.a. Osmani Lucky
Wholesale be, and it hereby is, denied.
This order is effective April 14, 2005.
Dated: February 24, 2005.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–5068 Filed 3–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
James S. Bischoff, M.D.; Revocation of
Registration
On June 28, 2004, the Deputy
Administrator, Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), issued an Order
to Show Cause/Immediate Suspension
of Registration to James S. Bischoff,
M.D. (Dr. Bischoff) who was notified of
an opportunity to show cause as to why
DEA should not revoke his DEA
Certificate of Registration BB0377247
under 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(4) and deny any
pending applications for renewal or
modification of that registration under
21 U.S.C. 823(f). Dr. Bischoff was
further notified that his registration was
being immediately suspended under 21
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S.C. 824(d) as an imminent danger to
the public health and safety.
The Order to Show Cause alleged in
relevant part, that Dr. Bischoff diverted
controlled substances through larceny
and fraudulent prescriptions, failed to
maintain required records, could not
account for 32,000 dosage units of
controlled substances and dispensed
controlled substances to individuals
without a bona fide doctor-patient
relationship or legitimate medical
purpose. The Order to Show Cause also
notified Dr. Bischoff that should no
request for a hearing be filed within 30
days, his hearing right would be deemed
waived.
On July 14, 2004, a DEA investigator
personally served the Order to Show
Cause/Immediate Suspension of
Registration on Dr. Bischoff at the
offices of the Ennis, Montana Police
Department. Since that date, DEA has
not received a request for a hearing or
any other reply from Dr. Bischoff or
anyone purporting to represent him in
this matter.
Therefore, the Deputy Administrator
of DEA, finding that (1) thirty days
having passed since personal delivery of
the Order to Show Cause/Immediate
Suspension of Registration to the
registrant and (2) no request for hearing
having been received, concludes that Dr.
Bischoff is deemed to have waived his
hearing right. See David W. Linder, 67
FR 12579 (2002). After considering
material from the investigative file in
this matter, the Deputy Administrator
now enters her final order without a
hearing pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43(d)
and (e) and 1301.46.
The Deputy Administrator finds that
Dr. Bischoff is registered with DEA as a
practitioner under Certificate of
Registration BB0377247. Dr. Bischoff’s
registered location is also his residence,
which is located in Ennis, Montana.
In April 2003, Dr. Bischoff took
‘‘Patient B,’’ a 16-year-old high school
student, to an out of town physician
specialist for emergency treatment after
the boy’s had was cut in an accident. Dr.
Bischoff was a friend of the boy’s father
and step-mother and would come to
their home for social visits/dinners.
They were both out of town at the time
of the accident and Dr. Bischoff
volunteered to take the boy to the
specialist. While the specialist did not
recommend any treatment with
controlled substances, Dr. Bischoff
wrote the boy a prescription for 100
tablets of Oxycontin, a Schedule II
narcotic controlled substance, which he
personally picked up a local pharmacy.
However, he delivered only 20 tablets to
the boy, unlawfully diverting the
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12732-12734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5068]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Tysa Management, d/b/a Osmani Lucky Wholesale; Denial of
Application
On July 23, 2004, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), issued an
Order to Show Cause to Mr. Ty Osmani, President, Tysa Management,
d.b.a. Osmani Lucky Wholesale (hereinafter referred to as ``OLW'')
proposing to deny its application executed on October 15, 2003, for DEA
Certificate of Registration as a distributor of list I chemicals. The
Order to Show Cause alleged that granting the application of OLW would
be inconsistent with the public interest as that term is used in 21
U.S.C. 823(h).
According to the DEA investigative file, the Order to Show Cause
was sent by certified mail to OLW at its proposed registered location
in Denison, Texas and was received on August 2, 2004. According to the
investigative file, DEA received a letter from Tysa Osmani (Mr. Osmani)
dated August 20, 2004, waiving the applicant's right to a hearing and
requesting that the firm be issued a registration to distribute
ephedrine.
Accordingly, the Deputy Administrator finds that OLW has waived its
hearing right. See, Aqui Enterprises, 67 Fed. Reg. 12567 (2002). After
considering relevant material from the investigative file in this
matter, the Deputy Administrator now enters her final order without a
hearing pursuant to 21 CFR 1309.53(b) and (d). The Deputy Administrator
finds as follows:
List I chemicals are those that may be used in the manufacture of a
controlled substance in violation of the Controlled Substances Act. 21
U.S.C. 802(34); 21 CFR 1310.02(a). As noted in previous DEA final
orders, Pseudoephedrine and ephedrine are list I chemicals commonly
used to illegally manufacture methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled
substance . Methamphetamine is an extremely potent central nervous
system stimulant and its illicit manufacture and abuse are ongoing
public health concerns in the United States. See e.g., Direct
Wholesale, 67 FR 11, 654 (2004); Yemen Wholesale Tobacco and Candy
Supply, Inc., 67 FR 9,997 (2002); Denver Wholesale, 67 FR 99,986
(2002).
On April 6, 2004, the State of Oklahoma enacted House Bill 2176.
Among its provisions, the newly enacted legislation has designated
pseudoephedrine tables as a Schedule V controlled substance under
Oklahoma law. This provision further mandates that pseudoephedrine
tablets sold only from licensed pharmacies and requires customers
seeking to purchase this product to present photo identifications and
sign for their purchases. As a result, it is presently prohibited under
Oklahoma law for persons to sell pseudoephedrine tables from
convenience stores or other non-pharmacy locations.
The Deputy Administrator's review of the investigative file reveals
that on October 15, 2003, Mr. Osmani submitted an application for DEA
Registration on behalf of OLW. OLW sought DEA registration as a
distributor of the list I chemicals ephedrine and pseudoephedrine. OLW
is a Limited Liability Corporation which became incorporated in Texas
on October 23, 2003, and Mr. Osmani and his wife are the company's only
employees.
On November 13, 2003, DEA diversion investigators conducted an on-
site preregistration inspection at OLW's proposed registered location
in Denison, Texas. The location requested by OLW as a DEA-registered
premise was a former gas station establishment. DEA's investigation
revealed that in addition to its proposed registered location, Mr.
Osmani owns the following Denison-area convenience stores. Lucky Liquor
& Discount Tobacco; Lucky Stop 2; and, Lucky Stop 4.
Mr. Osmani is also the owner of two Lucky Stop convenience stores
located in Cartwright and Durant, Oklahoma. DEA's investigation
revealed that as of January 2004, Cartwirght, Oklahoma had an estimated
population of 13,549. Each of Mr. Osmani's stores sell typical
convenience store items including tobacco products, candy, automobile
maintenance products and T-shirts.
Mr. Owmani informed DEA investigators that he would operate as a
wholesale distributor to his five convenience stores, which he
identified as his only customers. He further discussed plans to
distribute certain listed chemical products, including Mini-Thin
ephedrine tablets in six-count packets and 60-count bottles, as well as
Max Brand pseudoephedrine products, also in six-count packets and 60-
count bottles. Mr. Osmani estimated that these products would make up
five to fifteen percent of OLW's total sales. Mr. Osmani further
informed DEA investigators that OLW did not own any deliver trucks and
employees from the two Oklahoma convenience stores would drive to OLW's
Denison location to pick up list I chemical products for delivery to
the Oklahoma business establishment.
According to the investigative file, as of July 1, 2003,
distributors of pseudoephedrine products conducting business in
Oklahoma were required to obtain a registration with the Director of
the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Control (the
Bureau). 63 O.S. 2001, Section 2-302. DEA's investigation has revealed
that as of January 7, 2004, neither Mr. Osmani nor OLW were registered
with the Bureau to handle pseudoephedrine.
During the aforementioned onsite inspection by DEA, Mr. Osmani also
informed investigators that his suppliers for listed chemicals were
Silver Star and Import Warehouse, Incorporated, both of Dallas, Texas.
However, when DEA investigators conducted verification checks with
OLW's proposed suppliers on November 17, 2003, the owner of Import
Warehouse stated that he would not be supplying listed chemicals
products to OLW; and, the owner of Silver Star informed DEA personnel
that he had planned to supply only
[[Page 12733]]
ephedrine to OLW and not pseudoephedrine.
On November 19, 2003, DEA investigators requested purchase records
from the two aforementioned establishments. The owner of Import
Warehouse provided purchase records dating from May 23, 1998 to
September 27, 2000, for sales of listed chemicals to two of Mr.
Osmani's Denison-area convenience stores (Lucky Stop 2 and
Lucky Stop 4). The records revealed that with the exception of
July and August, 1998, Mr. Osmani ordered forty-eight, 60-count bottles
of Mini 2 Way 200mg. Guaifenesin nearly every month during the above
time period. In addition, Mr. Osmani ordered four cases (144 bottles
per case) of Max Alert Pseudo (pseudoephedrine) 60-count in July 1998.
One month later, Mr. Osmani ordered an additional 192 bottles of Max
Alert Pseudo.
The owner of Silver Star also provided purchase records dating from
April 24, 2001 to August 28, 2003, for the sale of listed chemical
products to two of Mr. Osmani's Denison-area convenience stores (Lucky
Liquor & discount Tobacco and Lucky Stop 4). The records
revealed that on eleven separate occasions from November 8, 2001 to
August 28, 2003, Mr. Osmani ordered a case (144 bottles per case) of
200-count Guaifensin 12.5mg; in April 2001 and again in November 2002,
Mr. Osmani purchased 288 bottles of this product; on April 19, 2003,
Mr. Osmani purchased 72 (60-count) bottles of Max Brand 2-Way
ephedrine.
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(h), the Deputy Administrator may deny an
application for Certificate of Registration if she determines that
granting the registration would be inconsistent with the public
interest as determined under that section. Section 823(h) requires the
following factors be considered in determining the public interest:
(1) Maintenance of effective controls against diversion of listed
chemicals into other than legitimate channels;
(2) Compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local law;
(3) Any prior conviction record under Federal or State laws
relating to controlled substances or to chemicals controlled under
Federal or State law;
(4) Any past experience in the manufacture and distribution of
chemicals; and
(5) Such other factors as are relevant to and consistent with the
public health and safety.
As with the public interest analysis for practitioners and
pharmacies pursuant to subsection (f) of section 823, these factors are
to be considered in the disjunctive; the Deputy Administrator may rely
on any one or combination of factors, and may give each factor the
weight she deems appropriate in determining whether a registration
should be revoked or an application for registration denied. See, e.g.,
ANM Wholesale, 69 FR 11,652 (2004); Energy Outlet, 64 FR 14269 (1999).
See also Henry J. Schwartz, Jr., M.D., 54 FR 16,422 (1989).
The Deputy Administrator finds factors one, two, four and five
relevant to OLW's pending registration application.
With regard to factor one, maintenance of effective controls
against diversion of listed chemicals into other than legitimate
channels, the Deputy Administrator finds substantial evidence in the
investigative file that OLW, through its owner Ty Osmani, has
participated in the unlawful diversion of pseudoephedrine having
reasonable cause to believe that it would be used to manufacture
illicit methamphetamine. Mr. Osmani has purchased large quantities of
pseudoephedrine and ephedrine products and distributed these products
through his convenience stores located in Texas and Oklahoma. Prior to
2004, these areas have been known for their numerous seizures involving
clandestine methamphetamine laboratories. In most instances, the
primary sources for the diversion of these products are convenience
stores and other ``non-traditional retailers of over-the-counter drug
products.'' Al-Alousi, Inc., 70 FR 3561 (2005). See, Sinbad
Distribution, 67 FR 10232, 10233 (2002). Therefore, factor one weights
against the granting of OLW's pending application for registration.
With regard to factor two, compliance with applicable Federal,
State, and local law, DEA's pre-registrant inspection revealed that as
of July 1, 2003, distributors of pseudoephedrine products conducting
business in Oklahoma were required to register with the state Bureau of
Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Control (the Bureau) pursuant to 63 O.S.
2001, Section 2-302. Mr. Osmani and OLW's failure to obtain state
registration to handle listed chemicals is relevant under factor two,
and also weighs against the granting of the pending application for
registration.
With regard to factor four, past experience in the manufacture and
distribution of chemicals, and factor five, such other factors relevant
to and consistent with the public safety, the Deputy Administrator
finds these factors relevant to Mr. Osmani and OLW's purchase of
quantities of listed chemical products for distribution to, and sale by
his convenience stores in Texas and Oklahoma. These listed chemical
products were for the most part, purchased by OLW on a monthly basis
and appeared to be far in excess of the expected demand for such
products. As noted in previous final orders, while there are no
specific prohibitions under the Controlled Substance Act regarding the
sale of listed chemical products to these entities, DEA has
nevertheless found that convenience stores constitute sources for the
diversion of listed chemical products. Sinbad Distributing, supra at
10233; K.V.M. Enterprises, 67 FR 70968 (2002) (denial of application
based in part upon information developed by DEA that the applicant
proposed to sell listed chemicals to gas stations, and the fact that
these establishments in turn have sold listed chemical products to
individuals engaged in the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine).
DEA has found persuasive, expert testimony in the area of
statistical analysis of convenience stores and their sale of
pseudoephedrine. Branex, Inc., 69 FR 8,682 (2004); Express Wholesale,
69 FR 62086, 62088 (2004). In analyzing the expected sale of listed
chemical products in the State of Oklahoma, a consultant in marketing
information and databases offered expert testimony through the use of
the 1997 United States Economic Census of Retail Trade and tabulated
data which indicated that ``over 97% of all sales of non-prescription
drug products,'' including non-prescription cough, cold and nasal
congestion remedies, occur in drug stores and pharmacies, supermarkets,
large discount merchandisers, mail-order houses and through electronic
shopping. The markeing consultant characterized these five retail
industries as ``the traditional marketplace where such goods are
purchased by ordinary customers.'' Express Wholesale, supra.
The market consultant also analyzed national data specific to the
sale of over-the-counter, non-prescription drugs containing
pseudoephedrine by convenience stores which he characterized as a
``nontraditional market'' for the sale of listed chemical products. He
further determined ``* * * that a very small percentage of the sales of
such goods occur in convenience stores--only about 2.6% of the HABC
[Health and Beauty Care] category of merchandise or 0.05% of total in-
store (non-gasoline) sales.'' The marketing consultant concluded that
``[c]onveniece stores, therefore, definitely constitute a `non-
traditional' market for the sale of over-the-counter, non-prescription
drug pesudoephedrine products.''
[[Page 12734]]
The marketing consultant further explained that this information
support's DEA's conclusion that pseudoephedrine products distributed to
this nontraditional market greatly exceeded the normal demand for such
products at such retail outlets. He agreed that such excessive sales
could be purchases of listed chemical products that were diverted to
illicit uses. With respect to Oklahoma wholesale pseudoephedrine sales
of several distributors and over 300 of their retail customers, all of
which were convenience stores, a July 2002 analysis by the marketing
consultant led to the conclusion ``that without evidence of the
existence of immense numbers of legitimate customers, it was likely
that the massive inventories of pseudoephedrine products purchased by
these Oklahoma stores were being turned to illegal uses.'' Express
Wholesale, supra.
With respect to the instant matter, Mr. Osmani and OLW have
similarly amassed large quantities of pseudoephedrine and ephedrine
products. The frequency and quantity of listed chemicals purchased by
OLW from 1998 to 2003 defined all available and conventional marketing
data for the expected sale of these products. Given the demonstrated
lack of legitimate demand for these products when sold from convenience
stores, the Deputy Administrator is left with the conclusion that Mr.
Osmani and OLW purchased pseudoephedrine and ephedrine products for
sale to individuals involved in the illicit manufacture of
methamphetamine.
As noted above, effective April 6, 2004, Oklahoma enacted House
Bill 2176, titled the ``Oklahoma Methamphetamine Reduction Act of
2004.'' This provision includes the requirement that the sale of
pseudoephedrine tablets are now restricted to licensed pharmacies. As
in a prior DEA final order, the Deputy Administrator finds in the
instant matter that OLW's proposed distribution of listed chemicals
through its convenience stores is no longer legally viable in Oklahoma.
See, Express Wholesale, supra at 62089.
A review of early data for 2004 reveals that the newly enacted laws
have resulted in an apparent reduction in the number of seizures
involving clandestine methamphetamine labs in Oklahoma. These
developments in Oklahoma are encouraging and represent another
important step in the ongoing battle to curb methamphetamine abuse in
the United States. In keeping with this positive trend, DEA must also
act in an appropriate fashion to ensure that listed chemicals are not
diverted. The Deputy Administrator notes that while Mr. Osmani and OLW
seek DEA registration in the State of Texas, the company also seeks to
distribute listed chemicals from convenience stores located in
Oklahoma. Based solely on the population statistics of Cartwright and
Durant, Oklahoma, it would appear at first glance that the market for
over-the-counter drug products in these cities is relatively
insignificant. However, as the record before the Deputy Administrator
clearly demonstrates, the relatively small size of the Oklahoma markets
serviced by OLW is not a significant factor since Mr. Osmani appears
intent on purchasing extraordinarily large quantities of listed
chemical products without regard to market size. These purchasing
practices indicate that OLW would willingly accommodate persons
involved in the illicit methamphetamine trade. Based on the foregoing,
the Deputy Administrator concludes that granting the pending
application of OLW would be inconsistent with the public interest.
Accordingly, the Deputy Administrator of the Drug Enforcement
Administration, pursuant to the authority vested in her by 21 U.S.C.
823 and 28 CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104, hereby orders that the pending
application for DEA Certificate of Registration, previously submitted
by Tysa Management, d.b.a. Osmani Lucky Wholesale be, and it hereby is,
denied. This order is effective April 14, 2005.
Dated: February 24, 2005.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-5068 Filed 3-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M