Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 12645-12646 [05-5054]

Download as PDF 12645 Notices Federal Register Vol. 70, No. 49 Tuesday, March 15, 2005 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request March 10, 2005. The Department of Agriculture has submitted the following information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104–13. Comments regarding (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of burden including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology should be addressed to: Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250– 7602. Comments regarding these information collections are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days of this notification. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling (202) 720–8681. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information that such persons are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it VerDate jul<14>2003 15:31 Mar 14, 2005 Jkt 205001 displays a currently valid OMB control number. Risk Management Agency Title: Organic Apple Production Survey in Pacific Northwest. OMB Control Number: 0563–NEW. Summary of Collection: The Risk Management Agency (RMA) is responsible for promoting, supporting, and regulating a broad array of marketbased, risk management programs for agricultural producers. In legislation enacted in 2000 and 2002, Congress authorized and directed the agency to ‘‘increase participation by producers of underserved agricultural commodities, including specialty crops’’ and to ‘‘enter into contracts to carry out research and development’’ to achieve this end. Need and Use of the Information: The main user of the data from the survey will be RMA in the development of appropriate risk management tools for the specialty crop producer as mandated by the Agricultural Risk Protection Act. The survey will enable the research partnership of RMA and the universities to develop a risk management profile of organic apple producers. An example of the analysis to be developed would be the projection of insurance demand under a variety of premium and indemnity calculations. In depth analysis of the survey results will provide guidance in the design of insurance programs. Description of Respondents: Farms; Business or other for-profit. Number of Respondents: 149. Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Other (One time). Total Burden Hours: 57. Risk Management Agency Title: Survey on Risk Issues for Organic Grain Farmers. OMB Control Number: 0563–NEW. Summary of Collection: The Risk Management Agency is responsible for promoting, supporting, and regulating a broad array of market-based, risk management programs for agricultural producers. In legislation enacted in 2000 and 2002, Congress authorized and directed the agency to ‘‘increase participation by producers of underserved agricultural commodities, including specialty crops’’ and to ‘‘enter into contracts to carry out research and development’’ to achieve this end. Need and Use of the Information: The main user of the data from the survey PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 will be the Risk Management Agency (RMA) in the development of appropriate risk management tools for organic grain producers. The survey will enable the research partnership of RMA and Kansas State University to develop a risk management profile of organic grain producers. An example of the analysis to be developed would be the projection of premiums for organic grains and net income projections under various market conditions and risk management strategies. In-depth analysis of the survey results will provide guidance in the design of risk management tools tailored for the use of organic grain producers. Description of Respondents: Farms; Business or other for-profit. Number of Respondents: 1,500. Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Other (One time). Total Burden Hours: 625. Risk Management Agency Title: Organic Handler Survey. OMB Control Number: 0563–NEW. Summary of Collection: The Risk Management Agency is responsible for promoting, supporting, and regulating a broad array of market-based, risk management programs for agricultural producers. In legislation enacted in 2000 and 2002, Congress authorized and directed the agency to ‘‘increase participation by producers of underserved agricultural commodities, including specialty crops’’ and to ‘‘enter into contracts to carry out research and development’’ to achieve this end. Need and Use of the Information: The price and marketing information will improve the efficiency of farmers’ production and marketing decisions. The research will reveal how the industry is coping with market risks and growth, will demonstrate different marketing options available to farmers, and determine the extent to which organic farmers are using specific riskmanagement tools traditionally used by conventional producers, such as contracts. The educational tool will provide farmers with information about risk-management strategies, marketing arrangements, and marketing channels for specific commodities. Certified organic farmers and those considering transitioning to organic farming will find this information useful in improving the efficiency of production and marketing decisions. E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM 15MRN1 12646 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 15, 2005 / Notices Description of Respondents: Farms; Business or other for-profit. Number of Respondents: 2,000. Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Other (One time). Total Burden Hours: 1,100. Risk Management Agency Title: Organic Price Index Project. OMB Control Number: 0563–NEW. Summary of Collection: The Risk Management Agency is responsible for promoting, supporting, and regulating a broad array of market-based, risk management programs for agricultural producers. In legislation enacted in 2000 and 2002, Congress authorized and directed the agency to ‘‘increase participation by producers of underserved agricultural commodities, including specialty crops’’ and to ‘‘enter into contracts to carry out research and development’’ to achieve this end. Need and Use of the Information: Since early 2003, the Rodale Institute has posted prices for around 40 organic products in a file called the ‘‘Organic Price Index’’. The prices have been collected from wholesale distributors, sales agencies, and cooperatives that specialize in the marketing of organic products. Fruit and vegetable prices have been collected from organic wholesalers operating in the vicinity of the Seattle and Boston wholesale produce markets. Prices of identical conventional products reported by Agricultural Marketing Service in these markets are also posted for comparison. As part of this project, prices will be collected for a wider array of organic products and in 13 additional market areas. Description of Respondents: Farms; Business or other for-profit. Number of Respondents: 60. Frequency of Responses: Reporting: On occasion. Total Burden Hours: 53. Ruth Brown, Departmental Information Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 05–5054 Filed 3–14–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–08–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Food Safety and Inspection Service [Docket No. 05–002N] Codex Alimentarius Commission: 22nd Session of the Codex Committee on General Principles Office of the Under Secretary for Food Safety. ACTION: Notice of public meeting; request for Comments. AGENCY: VerDate jul<14>2003 15:31 Mar 14, 2005 Jkt 205001 SUMMARY: The Office of the Under Secretary for Food Safety, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), United States Department of Health and Human Services, are sponsoring a public meeting on March 29, 2005, to provide draft U.S. positions and receive public comments on agenda items that will be discussed at the 22nd Session of the Codex Committee on General Principles (CCGP) of the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex). The 22nd Session of the CCGP will be held in Paris, France, April 11–15, 2005. The Under Secretary of USDA and FDA recognize the importance of providing interested parties with the opportunity to comment on the agenda items that will be debated at this forthcoming session of the CCGP. DATES: The public meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, March 29, 2005, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held in the USDA South Building Cafeteria (rear), 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC. Documents related to the 22nd Session of the CCGP will be accessible via the World Wide Web at the following address: https:// www.codexalimentarius.net/ current.asp. FSIS invites interested persons to submit comments on this notice. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: • Mail, including floppy disks or CD– ROMs, and hand -or courier-delivered items: Send to the FSIS Docket Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 300 12th Street, SW., Room 102, Cotton Annex, Washington D.C. 20730. All Comments received must include the Agency name and docket number 05–002N. All comments submitted in response to this notice, will be available for public inspection in the FSIS Docket Room at the address listed above between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. The comments also will be posted on the Agency’s Web site at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/ regulations/2005_Notices_Index/. Participation by Conference Call: A call-in number has been arranged: 1– 800–369–1941; the pass code is CODEX. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: About the 22nd Session of the CCGP: U.S. Delegate, F. Edward Scarbrough, Ph.D., U.S. Manager for Codex, FSIS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250, telephone: (202) 205–7760; facsimile: (202) 720– 3157. Electronic mail: ed.scarbrough@fsis.usda.gov. PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 About the Public Meeting Contact: Ellen Matten, International Issues Analyst, U.S. Codex Office, FSIS, Room 4861, South Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250, telephone: (202) 205–7760; facsimile: (202) 720–3157. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Codex Alimentarius (Codex) was established in 1962 by two United Nations organizations, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO). Codex is the major international organization for protecting the health and economic interests of consumers and encouraging fair international trade in food. Through adoption of food standards, codes of practice, and other guidelines developed by its committees, and by promoting their adoption and implementation by governments, Codex seeks to ensure that the world’s food supply is sound, wholesome, free from adulteration, and correctly labeled. In the United States, USDA, FDA, and the Environmental Protection Agency manage and carry out U.S. Codex activities. The Codex Committee on General Principles (CCGP) deals with rules and procedures referred to it by the Codex Alimentarius Commission, including the establishment of principles that define the purpose and scope of the Codex Alimentarius and the nature of Codex standards. The development of mechanisms to address any economic impact statements also is the responsibility of the CCGP. The CCGP is chaired by France. Issues To Be Discussed at the Public Meeting The following items on the agenda for the 22nd Session of CCGP will be discussed during the public meeting: • Matters referred by the Codex Alimentarius Commission and other Codex Committees. • Proposed Draft Working Principles for Risk Analysis for Food Safety. • Proposed Draft Revised Code of Ethics for International Trade in Foods. • Proposed Amendments to the Procedural Manual: Acceptance of Codex Standards. • Revision of the definition of the term ‘‘food’’. • Consideration of the structure and presentation of the Procedural Manual. • Clarification of the duration of the term of the Members of the Executive Committee. Each issue will be fully described in documents distributed, or to be distributed, by the French Secretariat to E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM 15MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12645-12646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-5054]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 15, 2005 / 
Notices

[[Page 12645]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

March 10, 2005.
    The Department of Agriculture has submitted the following 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. Comments 
regarding (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for 
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy 
of the agency's estimate of burden including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are 
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology should be addressed to: Desk 
Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), OIRA--Submission@omb.eop.gov or 
fax (202) 395-5806 and to Departmental Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, 
Mail Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250-7602. Comments regarding these 
information collections are best assured of having their full effect if 
received within 30 days of this notification. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling (202) 720-8681.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information 
unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB 
control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to 
respond to the collection of information that such persons are not 
required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number.

Risk Management Agency

    Title: Organic Apple Production Survey in Pacific Northwest.
    OMB Control Number: 0563-NEW.
    Summary of Collection: The Risk Management Agency (RMA) is 
responsible for promoting, supporting, and regulating a broad array of 
market-based, risk management programs for agricultural producers. In 
legislation enacted in 2000 and 2002, Congress authorized and directed 
the agency to ``increase participation by producers of underserved 
agricultural commodities, including specialty crops'' and to ``enter 
into contracts to carry out research and development'' to achieve this 
end.
    Need and Use of the Information: The main user of the data from the 
survey will be RMA in the development of appropriate risk management 
tools for the specialty crop producer as mandated by the Agricultural 
Risk Protection Act. The survey will enable the research partnership of 
RMA and the universities to develop a risk management profile of 
organic apple producers. An example of the analysis to be developed 
would be the projection of insurance demand under a variety of premium 
and indemnity calculations. In depth analysis of the survey results 
will provide guidance in the design of insurance programs.
    Description of Respondents: Farms; Business or other for-profit.
    Number of Respondents: 149.
    Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Other (One time).
    Total Burden Hours: 57.

Risk Management Agency

    Title: Survey on Risk Issues for Organic Grain Farmers.
    OMB Control Number: 0563-NEW.
    Summary of Collection: The Risk Management Agency is responsible 
for promoting, supporting, and regulating a broad array of market-
based, risk management programs for agricultural producers. In 
legislation enacted in 2000 and 2002, Congress authorized and directed 
the agency to ``increase participation by producers of underserved 
agricultural commodities, including specialty crops'' and to ``enter 
into contracts to carry out research and development'' to achieve this 
end.
    Need and Use of the Information: The main user of the data from the 
survey will be the Risk Management Agency (RMA) in the development of 
appropriate risk management tools for organic grain producers. The 
survey will enable the research partnership of RMA and Kansas State 
University to develop a risk management profile of organic grain 
producers. An example of the analysis to be developed would be the 
projection of premiums for organic grains and net income projections 
under various market conditions and risk management strategies. In-
depth analysis of the survey results will provide guidance in the 
design of risk management tools tailored for the use of organic grain 
producers.
    Description of Respondents: Farms; Business or other for-profit.
    Number of Respondents: 1,500.
    Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Other (One time).
    Total Burden Hours: 625.

Risk Management Agency

    Title: Organic Handler Survey.
    OMB Control Number: 0563-NEW.
    Summary of Collection: The Risk Management Agency is responsible 
for promoting, supporting, and regulating a broad array of market-
based, risk management programs for agricultural producers. In 
legislation enacted in 2000 and 2002, Congress authorized and directed 
the agency to ``increase participation by producers of underserved 
agricultural commodities, including specialty crops'' and to ``enter 
into contracts to carry out research and development'' to achieve this 
end.
    Need and Use of the Information: The price and marketing 
information will improve the efficiency of farmers' production and 
marketing decisions. The research will reveal how the industry is 
coping with market risks and growth, will demonstrate different 
marketing options available to farmers, and determine the extent to 
which organic farmers are using specific risk-management tools 
traditionally used by conventional producers, such as contracts. The 
educational tool will provide farmers with information about risk-
management strategies, marketing arrangements, and marketing channels 
for specific commodities. Certified organic farmers and those 
considering transitioning to organic farming will find this information 
useful in improving the efficiency of production and marketing 
decisions.

[[Page 12646]]

    Description of Respondents: Farms; Business or other for-profit.
    Number of Respondents: 2,000.
    Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Other (One time).
    Total Burden Hours: 1,100.

Risk Management Agency

    Title: Organic Price Index Project.
    OMB Control Number: 0563-NEW.
    Summary of Collection: The Risk Management Agency is responsible 
for promoting, supporting, and regulating a broad array of market-
based, risk management programs for agricultural producers. In 
legislation enacted in 2000 and 2002, Congress authorized and directed 
the agency to ``increase participation by producers of underserved 
agricultural commodities, including specialty crops'' and to ``enter 
into contracts to carry out research and development'' to achieve this 
end.
    Need and Use of the Information: Since early 2003, the Rodale 
Institute has posted prices for around 40 organic products in a file 
called the ``Organic Price Index''. The prices have been collected from 
wholesale distributors, sales agencies, and cooperatives that 
specialize in the marketing of organic products. Fruit and vegetable 
prices have been collected from organic wholesalers operating in the 
vicinity of the Seattle and Boston wholesale produce markets. Prices of 
identical conventional products reported by Agricultural Marketing 
Service in these markets are also posted for comparison. As part of 
this project, prices will be collected for a wider array of organic 
products and in 13 additional market areas.
    Description of Respondents: Farms; Business or other for-profit.
    Number of Respondents: 60.
    Frequency of Responses: Reporting: On occasion.
    Total Burden Hours: 53.

Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-5054 Filed 3-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.