Notice of Intent To Rule on Application 05-06-C-00-BTR To impose and Use the Revenue from a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at Baton Rouge Metropolitan Airport, Baton Rouge, LA, 12530-12531 [05-4982]
Download as PDF
12530
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Notices
to the FAA at the following address:
Jackson Airports District Office, 100
West Cross Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS
39208–2307.
In addition, one copy of any
comments submitted to the FAA must
be mailed or delivered to Mr. Menzo W.
Driskell, Executive Director of the Craig
Field Airport and Industrial Authority
at the following address: Craig Field and
Industrial Authority, 48 Fifth Street;
Craig Industrial Park; Selma, AL 36701.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Roderick T. Nicholson, Program
Manager, Jackson Airports District
Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B,
Jackson, MS 39208–2307, (601) 664–
9884. The land release request may be
reviewed in person at this same
location.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
is reviewing a request by the Craig Field
Airport and Industrial Authority to
release 0.969 acres of surplus property
at the Craig Field Airport. The property
will be for Louisiana Pacific Polymers
(LP), located in the Craig Industrial
Complex, to upgrade their
manufacturing facility. This expansion
will include the addition of a rail spur.
The property land use is currently
agricultural. The net proceeds from the
sale of this property will be used for
airport purposes.
Any person may inspect the request
in person at the FAA office listed above
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. In addition, any person may,
upon request, inspect the request, notice
and other documents germane to the
request in person at the city of Selma.
Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on March 7,
2005.
Rans D. Black,
Manager, Jackson Airports District Office,
Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 05–4910 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
Federal Aviation Administration
Research, Engineering and
Development Advisory Committee
Pursuant to section 10((A)(2) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public
Law 92–463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is
hereby given of a meeting of the FAA
Research, Engineering and Development
(R,E&D) Advisory Committee.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
Research, Engineering &
Development Advisory Committee.
NAME:
15:31 Mar 11, 2005
Issued in Washington, DC on March 7,
2005.
Joan Bauerlein,
Director of Operations Planning Research &
Development.
[FR Doc. 05–4912 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Intent To Rule on Application
05–06–C–00–BTR To impose and Use
the Revenue from a Passenger Facility
Charge (PFC) at Baton Rouge
Metropolitan Airport, Baton Rouge, LA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Rule on
Application.
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
VerDate jul<14>2003
April 12–13, 2005–8 a.m.
to 5 p.m.
PLACE: Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Bessie
Coleman Room, Washington, DC 20591.
PURPOSE: The meeting agenda will
include receiving from the Committee
guidance for FAA’s research and
development investments in the areas of
air traffic services, airports, aircraft
safety, human factors and environment
and energy. We will also receive
recommendations from the Air Traffic
Services Transition Working Group.
Attendance is open to the interested
public but seating is limited. Persons
wishing to attend the meeting or obtain
information should contact Gloria
Dunderman at the Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
(202) 267–8937 or
gloria.dunderman@faa.gov. Attendees
will have to present picture ID at the
security desk and escorted to the Bessie
Coleman Room.
Members of the public may present a
written statement to the Committee at
any time.
TIME AND DATE:
Jkt 205001
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and
invites public comment on the
application to impose and use the
revenue from a PFC at Baton Rouge
Metropolitan Airport under the
provisions of the Aviation Safety and
Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title
IX of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L.
101–508) and part 158 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this
application may be mailed or delivered
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in triplicate copies to the FAA at the
following address: Mr. G. Thomas
Wade, Federal Aviation Administration,
Southwest Region, Airports Division,
Planning and Programming Branch,
ASW–611, Fort Worth, TX 76193–0610.
In addition, one copy of any
comments submitted to the FAA must
be mailed or delivered to Anthony
Marino, Manager of Baton Rouge
Metropolitan Airport at the following
address: Mr. Anthony Marino, Director
of Aviation, Greater Baton Rouge
Airport District, Ryan Terminal
Building, Suite 212, Baton Rouge, LA
70807.
Air carriers and foreign air carriers
may submit copies of the written
comments previously provided to the
Airport under section 158.23 of part
158.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
G. Thomas Wade, Federal Aviation
Administration, Southwest Region,
Airports Division, Planning and
Programming Branch, ASW–611, Fort
Worth, TX 76193–0610, (817) 222–5613.
The application may be reviewed in
person at this same location.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
proposes to rule and invites public
comment on the application to impose
and use the revenue from a PFC at Baton
Rouge Metropolitan Airport under the
provisions of the Aviation Safety and
Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (title IX
of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation
Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and part
158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
(14 CFR part 158).
On March 8, 2005, the FAA
determined that the application to
impose and use the revenue from a PFC
submitted by the Airport was
substantially complete within the
requirements of section 158.25 of part
158. The FAA will approve or
disapprove the application, in whole or
in part, no later than July 1, 2005.
The following is a brief overview of
the application.
Level of the proposed PFC: $4.50.
Proposed charge effective date:
November 1, 2021.
Proposed charge expiration date:
March 1, 2026.
Total estimated PFC revenue:
$9,986,100.
PFC application number: 05–06–C–
00–BTR.
Brief description of proposed
project(s):
Projects To Impose and Use PFC’s
1. Extend Runway 4L/22R.
2. Expand General Aviation Apron.
3. Professional Fees.
Proposed class or classes of air
carriers to be exempted from collecting
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Notices
PFC’s: FAR part 135 on demand air
Taxi/Commercial Operator (ATCO)
reporting on FAA Form 1800–31.
Any person may inspect the
application in person at the FAA office
listed above under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT and at the FAA
regional Airports office located at:
Federal Aviation Administration,
Southwest Region, Airports Division,
Planning and Programming Branch,
ASW–610, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, TX 76137–4298.
In addition, any person may, upon
request, inspect the application, notice
and other documents germane to the
application in person at Baton Rouge
Metropolitan Airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on March 9,
2005.
Larry F. Clark,
Acting Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 05–4982 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2005–20321]
Decision That Certain Nonconforming
Motor Vehicles are Eligible for
Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of decision by NHTSA
that certain nonconforming motor
vehicles are eligible for importation.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document announces
decisions by NHTSA that certain motor
vehicles not originally manufactured to
comply with all applicable Federal
motor vehicle safety standards are
eligible for importation into the United
States because they are substantially
similar to vehicles originally
manufactured for importation into and/
or sale in the United States and certified
by their manufacturers as complying
with the safety standards, and they are
capable of being readily altered to
conform to the standards.
DATES: These decisions became effective
on the dates specified in Annex A.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:31 Mar 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
standards shall be refused admission
into the United States unless NHTSA
has decided that the motor vehicle is
substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation
into and sale in the United States,
certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of
the same model year as the model of the
motor vehicle to be compared, and is
capable of being readily altered to
conform to all applicable Federal motor
vehicle safety standards.
Where there is no substantially
similar U.S.-certified motor vehicle, 49
U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) permits a
nonconforming motor vehicle to be
admitted into the United States if its
safety features comply with, or are
capable of being altered to comply with,
all applicable Federal motor vehicle
safety standards based on destructive
test data or such other evidence as
NHTSA decides to be adequate.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
NHTSA received petitions from
registered importers to decide whether
the vehicles listed in Annex A to this
notice are eligible for importation into
the United States. To afford an
opportunity for public comment,
NHTSA published notice of these
petitions as specified in Annex A. The
reader is referred to those notices for a
thorough description of the petitions.
No substantive comments were received
in response to these notices. Based on
its review of the information submitted
by the petitioners, NHTSA has decided
to grant the petitions.
Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject
Vehicles
The importer of a vehicle admissible
under any final decision must indicate
on the form HS–7 accompanying entry
the appropriate vehicle eligibility
number indicating that the vehicle is
eligible for entry. Vehicle eligibility
numbers assigned to vehicles admissible
under this decision are specified in
Annex A.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12531
Final Decision
Accordingly, on the basis of the
foregoing, NHTSA hereby decides that
each motor vehicle listed in Annex A to
this notice, which was not originally
manufactured to comply with all
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety
standards, is either (1) substantially
similar to a motor vehicle manufactured
for importation into and/or sale in the
United States, and certified under 49
U.S.C. 30115, as specified in Annex A,
and is capable of being readily altered
to conform to all applicable Federal
motor vehicle safety standards or (2) has
safety features that comply with, or are
capable of being altered to comply with,
all applicable Federal motor vehicle
safety standards.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and
(b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority
at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
Annex A.—Nonconforming Motor Vehicles
Decided To Be Eligible for Importation
1. Docket No. NHTSA–2004–19486
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2001–2002
Mercedes Benz C Class (203) Passenger Cars.
Substantially Similar
U.S.-Certified Vehicles: 2001–2002
Mercedes Benz C–320 (203) Passenger Cars.
Notice of Petition
Published at: 69 FR 64127 (November 3,
2004).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–456
(effective date December 14, 2004).
2. Docket No. NHTSA–2004–19122
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2004
Lamborghini Gallardo Passenger Cars
(Manufactured 1/1/2004–12/31/2004).
Substantially Similar
U.S.-Certified Vehicles: 2004 Lamborghini
Passenger Cars (Manufactured 1/1/2004–12/
31/2004).
Notice of Petition
Published at: 69 FR 60933 (October 13,
2004).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–458
(effective date December 20, 2004).
3. Docket No. NHTSA–2004–19548
Nonconforming Vehicles: 1998 Lexus
GS300 Passenger Cars.
Substantially Similar
U.S.-Certified Vehicles: 1998 Lexus GS300
Passenger Cars.
Notice of Petition
Published at: 69 FR 67209 (November 16,
2004).
Vehicle Eligibility Number: VSP–460
(effective date December 22, 2004).
4. Docket No. NHTSA–2004–19547
Nonconforming Vehicles: 2003–2004 BMW
X5 Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles
(Manufactured 1/1/2003–12/31/2004).
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 48 (Monday, March 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12530-12531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4982]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Intent To Rule on Application 05-06-C-00-BTR To impose
and Use the Revenue from a Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) at Baton
Rouge Metropolitan Airport, Baton Rouge, LA
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Rule on Application.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the
application to impose and use the revenue from a PFC at Baton Rouge
Metropolitan Airport under the provisions of the Aviation Safety and
Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101-508) and part 158 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered in
triplicate copies to the FAA at the following address: Mr. G. Thomas
Wade, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports
Division, Planning and Programming Branch, ASW-611, Fort Worth, TX
76193-0610.
In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to Anthony Marino, Manager of Baton Rouge
Metropolitan Airport at the following address: Mr. Anthony Marino,
Director of Aviation, Greater Baton Rouge Airport District, Ryan
Terminal Building, Suite 212, Baton Rouge, LA 70807.
Air carriers and foreign air carriers may submit copies of the
written comments previously provided to the Airport under section
158.23 of part 158.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. G. Thomas Wade, Federal Aviation
Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, Planning and
Programming Branch, ASW-611, Fort Worth, TX 76193-0610, (817) 222-5613.
The application may be reviewed in person at this same location.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public
comment on the application to impose and use the revenue from a PFC at
Baton Rouge Metropolitan Airport under the provisions of the Aviation
Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (title IX of the Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101-508) and part 158 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158).
On March 8, 2005, the FAA determined that the application to impose
and use the revenue from a PFC submitted by the Airport was
substantially complete within the requirements of section 158.25 of
part 158. The FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole
or in part, no later than July 1, 2005.
The following is a brief overview of the application.
Level of the proposed PFC: $4.50.
Proposed charge effective date: November 1, 2021.
Proposed charge expiration date: March 1, 2026.
Total estimated PFC revenue: $9,986,100.
PFC application number: 05-06-C-00-BTR.
Brief description of proposed project(s):
Projects To Impose and Use PFC's
1. Extend Runway 4L/22R.
2. Expand General Aviation Apron.
3. Professional Fees.
Proposed class or classes of air carriers to be exempted from
collecting
[[Page 12531]]
PFC's: FAR part 135 on demand air Taxi/Commercial Operator (ATCO)
reporting on FAA Form 1800-31.
Any person may inspect the application in person at the FAA office
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT and at the FAA
regional Airports office located at: Federal Aviation Administration,
Southwest Region, Airports Division, Planning and Programming Branch,
ASW-610, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137-4298.
In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application,
notice and other documents germane to the application in person at
Baton Rouge Metropolitan Airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on March 9, 2005.
Larry F. Clark,
Acting Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 05-4982 Filed 3-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M