Uniform Compliance Date for Food Labeling Regulations, 12414-12416 [05-4956]
Download as PDF
12414
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The Rule
Federal Aviation Administration
This amendment to part 71 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
part 71) provides controlled Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface for aircraft
conducting IFR operations within an 8mile radius of Mifflintown Airport,
Mifflintown, PA.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule will not have
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
that coincides with the Reedsville, PA, Class
E airspace area.
*
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2004–19458; Airspace
Docket No. 04–AEA–11]
Establishment of Class E Airspace;
Mifflintown, PA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) DOT.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: This action establishes Class
E airspace at Mifflintown, PA.
Controlled airspace extending upward
from 700 feet Above Ground Level
(AGL) is needed to contain aircraft
operating into Mifflintown Airport,
Mifflintown, PA, under Instrument
Flight Rules (IFR).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
0901 UTC September
29, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr.
Francis Jordan, Airspace Specialist,
Airspace Branch, Eastern Terminal
Service Unit, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1 Aviation Plaza,
Jamaica, New York 11434–4809,
telephone: (718) 553–4521.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
History
Adoption of the Amendment
On December 17, 2004, a notice
proposing to amend Part 71 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
Part 71) by establishing a Class E
airspace area at Mifflintown, PA, was
published in the Federal Register (69
FR 75491–75492). The proposed action
would provide controlled airspace to
accommodate Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures (SIAP), based on
area navigation (RNAV), to Mifflintown
Airport. Interested parties were invited
to participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA
on or before January 18, 2005. No
comments to the proposal were
received. The rule is adopted as
proposed.
The coordinates for this airspace
docket are based on North American
Datum 83. Class E airspace area
designations for airspace extending
upward from the surface of the earth are
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.9M, dated August 30, 2004,
and effective September 16, 2004, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document will be
published in the Order.
I
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Mar 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; EO 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
The incorporation by reference in 14
CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9M,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 30, 2004, and
effective September 16, 2004, is
amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA PA E5 Mifflintown, PA [New]
Mifflintown Airport, Mifflintown, PA
(Lat. 40°36′18″ N., long. 77°24′18″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius
of Mifflintown Airport, excluding the portion
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
Issued in Jamaica, New York on March 3,
2005.
John G. McCartney,
Acting Area Director, Eastern Terminal
Operations.
[FR Doc. 05–4981 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 101
[Docket No. 2000N–1596] (formerly 00N–
1596)
Uniform Compliance Date for Food
Labeling Regulations
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is establishing
January 1, 2008, as the uniform
compliance date for food labeling
regulations that are issued between
March 14, 2005, and December 31, 2006.
FDA periodically announces uniform
compliance dates for new food labeling
requirements to minimize the economic
impact of label changes. On December
31, 2002, FDA established January 1,
2006, as the uniform compliance date
for food labeling regulations that issued
between January 1, 2003, and December
31, 2004.
DATES: This rule is effective March 14,
2005. Submit written or electronic
comments May 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. 2000N–1596,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web site: https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the agency Web site.
• E-mail: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov.
Include Docket No. 00N–1596 in the
subject line of your e-mail message.
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For
paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions]:
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Docket No. 2000N–1596 for this
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/
default.htm, including any personal
information provided. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the Comments
discussion of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/
default.htm and insert the docket
number 2000N–1596, found in brackets
in the heading of this document, into
the ‘‘Search’’ box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Louis B. Brock, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–24), Food
and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,
301–436–2378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA
periodically issues regulations requiring
changes in the labeling of food. If the
effective dates of these labeling changes
were not coordinated, the cumulative
economic impact on the food industry
of having to respond separately to each
change would be substantial. Therefore,
the agency periodically has announced
uniform compliance dates for new food
labeling requirements (see, e.g., the
Federal Registers of October 19, 1984
(49 FR 41019), December 24, 1996 (61
FR 67710), December 27, 1996 (61 FR
68145), December 23, 1998 (63 FR
71015), November 20, 2000 (65 FR
69666), and December 31, 2002 (67 FR
79851)). Use of a uniform compliance
date provides for an orderly and
economical industry adjustment to new
labeling requirements by allowing
sufficient lead time to plan for the use
of existing label inventories and the
development of new labeling materials.
This policy serves consumers’ interests
as well because the cost of multiple
short-term label revisions that would
otherwise occur would likely be passed
on to consumers in the form of higher
prices.
The agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.30(k) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
This final rule contains no collections
of information. Therefore, clearance by
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Mar 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 is not required.
FDA has examined the impacts of the
final rule under Executive Order 12866
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public
Law 104–4). Executive Order 12866
directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). The agency
believes that this final rule is not a
significant regulatory action under the
Executive order.
The establishment of a uniform
compliance date does not in itself lead
to costs or benefits. We will assess the
costs and benefits of the uniform
compliance date in the regulatory
impact analyses of the labeling rules
that take effect at that date.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because the final rule does not
impose compliance costs on small
entities, the agency certifies that the
final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $115
million, using the most current (2003)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA does not expect
this final rule to result in any 1-year
expenditure that would meet or exceed
this amount.
FDA has analyzed this final rule in
accordance with the principles set forth
in Executive Order 13132. FDA has
determined that the rule does not
contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, the
agency has concluded that the rule does
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12415
not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in
the Executive order and, consequently,
a federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
This action is not intended to change
existing requirements for compliance
dates contained in final rules published
before March 14, 2005. Therefore, all
final FDA regulations published in the
Federal Register before March 14, 2005,
will still go into effect on the date stated
in the respective final rule.
The agency generally encourages
industry to comply with new labeling
regulations as quickly as feasible,
however. Thus, when industry members
voluntarily change their labels, it is
appropriate that they incorporate any
new requirements that have been
published as final regulations up to that
time.
In rulemaking that began with
publication of a proposal on April 15,
1996 (61 FR 16422), and ended with a
final rule on December 24, 1996, FDA
provided notice and an opportunity for
comment on the practice of establishing
uniform compliance dates by issuance
of a final rule announcing the date.
Receiving no comments objecting to this
practice, FDA finds any further
rulemaking unnecessary for
establishment of the uniform
compliance date. Nonetheless, under 21
CFR 10.40(e)(1), FDA is providing an
opportunity for comment on whether
this uniform compliance date should be
modified or revoked.
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
After its review of any comments
received to this final rule, FDA will
either publish a document providing its
conclusions concerning the comments
or will initiate notice and comment
rulemaking to modify or revoke the
uniform compliance date established by
this final rule.
The new uniform compliance date
will apply only to final FDA food
labeling regulations that require changes
in the labeling of food products and that
publish after March 14, 2005, and before
December 31, 2006. Those regulations
will specifically identify January 1,
2008, as their compliance date. All food
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
12416
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
products subject to the January 1, 2008,
compliance date must comply with the
appropriate regulations when initially
introduced into interstate commerce on
or after January 1, 2008. If any food
labeling regulation involves special
circumstances that justify a compliance
date other than January 1, 2008, the
agency will determine for that
regulation an appropriate compliance
date, which will be specified when the
final regulation is published.
Dated: March 8, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–4956 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD13–05–003]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Protection of Military
Cargo, Captain of the Port Zone Puget
Sound, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Captain of the Port Puget
Sound will begin enforcing the Budd
Inlet security zone in West Bay,
Olympia, WA, on Friday, March 11,
2005 at 8 a.m. Pacific Standard Time.
The security zone provides for the
security of Department of Defense assets
and military cargo in the navigable
waters of Puget Sound and adjacent
waters. The security zone will be
enforced until Tuesday, March 15, 2005
at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Standard Time.
DATES: The Budd Inlet security zone set
forth in 33 CFR 165.1321 will be
enforced from Friday, March 11, 2005 at
8 a.m. to Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at
11:59 p.m. Pacific Standard Time, at
which time enforcement will be
suspended.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Captain of the Port Puget Sound, 1519
Alaskan Way South, Seattle, WA 98134
at (206) 217–6200 or (800) 688–6664 to
obtain information concerning
enforcement of 33 CFR 165.1321.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
27, 2004, the Coast Guard published a
final rule (69 FR 52603) establishing
regulations, in 33 CFR 165.1321, for the
security of Department of Defense assets
and military cargo in the navigable
waters of Puget Sound and adjacent
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Mar 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
waters. On December 10, 2004, the
Coast Guard published a final rule (69
FR 71711), which amended 33 CFR
165.1321 by adding Budd Inlet,
Olympia, WA as a permanent security
zone. These security zones provide for
the regulation of vessel traffic in the
vicinity of military cargo loading
facilities in the navigable waters of the
United States. These security zones also
exclude persons and vessels from the
immediate vicinity of these facilities
during military cargo loading and
unloading operations. In addition, the
regulation establishes requirements for
all vessels to obtain permission of the
COTP or the COTP’s designated
representative, including the Vessel
Traffic Service Puget Sound (VTS) to
enter, move within, or exit these
security zones when they are enforced.
Entry into these zones is prohibited
unless otherwise exempted or excluded
under 33 CFR 165.1321 or unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designee.
The Captain of the Port Puget Sound
will begin enforcing the Budd Inlet
security zone established by 33 CFR
165.1321 on Friday, March 11, 2005 at
8 a.m. Pacific Standard Time. The
security zone will be enforced until
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 11:59 p.m.
Pacific Standard Time. All persons and
vessels are authorized to enter, move
within, and exit the security zone on or
after Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 11:59
p.m. Pacific Standard Time unless a
new notice of enforcement is issued
before then.
Ohio submitted this revision as a change
to the SIP for NOX on June 28, 2004. In
the direct final rule, EPA stated that if
adverse comments were submitted by
February 19, 2005, the rule would be
withdrawn and not take effect. On
February 18, 2005, EPA received a
comment from a citizen and from the
State of Ohio. EPA believes the
comments are adverse and, therefore,
EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule.
EPA will address the comments in a
subsequent final action based upon the
proposed action also published on
January 19, 2005 (70 FR 2992). EPA will
not institute a second comment period
on this action.
DATES: The direct final rule published at
70 FR 2954 on January 19, 2005, is
withdrawn as of March 14, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Paskevicz, Engineer, Criteria Pollutant
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, Telephone:
(312) 886–6084. e-mail address:
paskevicz.john@epa.gov.
Dated: March 3, 2005.
Danny Ellis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 05–4965 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
PART 52—[AMENDED]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R05–OAR–2004–OH–0003; FRL–7883–4]
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 1, 2005.
Norman Niedergang,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
Accordingly, the amendment to 40
CFR 52.1870 published in the Federal
Register on January 19, 2005 (70 FR
2954) on pages 2954—2959 are
withdrawn as of March 14, 2005.
I
[FR Doc. 05–4899 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio;
Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule
40 CFR Part 271
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.
Tennessee: Final Authorization of
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
AGENCY:
Due to the receipt of adverse
comments the EPA is withdrawing the
January 19, 2005 (70 FR 2954), direct
final rule approving a revision to Ohio’s
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The State of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FRL–7883–5]
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Tennessee has applied to EPA
for Final authorization of the changes to
its hazardous waste program under the
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 48 (Monday, March 14, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12414-12416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4956]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 101
[Docket No. 2000N-1596] (formerly 00N-1596)
Uniform Compliance Date for Food Labeling Regulations
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is establishing January
1, 2008, as the uniform compliance date for food labeling regulations
that are issued between March 14, 2005, and December 31, 2006. FDA
periodically announces uniform compliance dates for new food labeling
requirements to minimize the economic impact of label changes. On
December 31, 2002, FDA established January 1, 2006, as the uniform
compliance date for food labeling regulations that issued between
January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2004.
DATES: This rule is effective March 14, 2005. Submit written or
electronic comments May 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. 2000N-
1596, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the agency Web site.
E-mail: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov. Include Docket No. 00N-1596
in the subject line of your e-mail message.
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions]: Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and
[[Page 12415]]
Docket No. 2000N-1596 for this rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm, including any personal information provided. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the Comments discussion of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm
and insert the docket number 2000N-1596, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louis B. Brock, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-24), Food and Drug Administration, 5100
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-436-2378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA periodically issues regulations
requiring changes in the labeling of food. If the effective dates of
these labeling changes were not coordinated, the cumulative economic
impact on the food industry of having to respond separately to each
change would be substantial. Therefore, the agency periodically has
announced uniform compliance dates for new food labeling requirements
(see, e.g., the Federal Registers of October 19, 1984 (49 FR 41019),
December 24, 1996 (61 FR 67710), December 27, 1996 (61 FR 68145),
December 23, 1998 (63 FR 71015), November 20, 2000 (65 FR 69666), and
December 31, 2002 (67 FR 79851)). Use of a uniform compliance date
provides for an orderly and economical industry adjustment to new
labeling requirements by allowing sufficient lead time to plan for the
use of existing label inventories and the development of new labeling
materials. This policy serves consumers' interests as well because the
cost of multiple short-term label revisions that would otherwise occur
would likely be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices.
The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.30(k) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
This final rule contains no collections of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive
Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). Executive
Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that
this final rule is not a significant regulatory action under the
Executive order.
The establishment of a uniform compliance date does not in itself
lead to costs or benefits. We will assess the costs and benefits of the
uniform compliance date in the regulatory impact analyses of the
labeling rules that take effect at that date.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because the final rule does not impose compliance
costs on small entities, the agency certifies that the final rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $115 million, using the most current (2003) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
final rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that the rule
does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Accordingly, the agency has concluded
that the rule does not contain policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
This action is not intended to change existing requirements for
compliance dates contained in final rules published before March 14,
2005. Therefore, all final FDA regulations published in the Federal
Register before March 14, 2005, will still go into effect on the date
stated in the respective final rule.
The agency generally encourages industry to comply with new
labeling regulations as quickly as feasible, however. Thus, when
industry members voluntarily change their labels, it is appropriate
that they incorporate any new requirements that have been published as
final regulations up to that time.
In rulemaking that began with publication of a proposal on April
15, 1996 (61 FR 16422), and ended with a final rule on December 24,
1996, FDA provided notice and an opportunity for comment on the
practice of establishing uniform compliance dates by issuance of a
final rule announcing the date. Receiving no comments objecting to this
practice, FDA finds any further rulemaking unnecessary for
establishment of the uniform compliance date. Nonetheless, under 21 CFR
10.40(e)(1), FDA is providing an opportunity for comment on whether
this uniform compliance date should be modified or revoked.
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday. After its review of any comments received to this final
rule, FDA will either publish a document providing its conclusions
concerning the comments or will initiate notice and comment rulemaking
to modify or revoke the uniform compliance date established by this
final rule.
The new uniform compliance date will apply only to final FDA food
labeling regulations that require changes in the labeling of food
products and that publish after March 14, 2005, and before December 31,
2006. Those regulations will specifically identify January 1, 2008, as
their compliance date. All food
[[Page 12416]]
products subject to the January 1, 2008, compliance date must comply
with the appropriate regulations when initially introduced into
interstate commerce on or after January 1, 2008. If any food labeling
regulation involves special circumstances that justify a compliance
date other than January 1, 2008, the agency will determine for that
regulation an appropriate compliance date, which will be specified when
the final regulation is published.
Dated: March 8, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-4956 Filed 3-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S