Uniform Compliance Date for Food Labeling Regulations, 12414-12416 [05-4956]

Download as PDF 12414 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The Rule Federal Aviation Administration This amendment to part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 71) provides controlled Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface for aircraft conducting IFR operations within an 8mile radius of Mifflintown Airport, Mifflintown, PA. The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule will not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. that coincides with the Reedsville, PA, Class E airspace area. * 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA–2004–19458; Airspace Docket No. 04–AEA–11] Establishment of Class E Airspace; Mifflintown, PA Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT. AGENCY: ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E airspace at Mifflintown, PA. Controlled airspace extending upward from 700 feet Above Ground Level (AGL) is needed to contain aircraft operating into Mifflintown Airport, Mifflintown, PA, under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR). EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC September 29, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Francis Jordan, Airspace Specialist, Airspace Branch, Eastern Terminal Service Unit, Federal Aviation Administration, 1 Aviation Plaza, Jamaica, New York 11434–4809, telephone: (718) 553–4521. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). History Adoption of the Amendment On December 17, 2004, a notice proposing to amend Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 71) by establishing a Class E airspace area at Mifflintown, PA, was published in the Federal Register (69 FR 75491–75492). The proposed action would provide controlled airspace to accommodate Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP), based on area navigation (RNAV), to Mifflintown Airport. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking proceeding by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA on or before January 18, 2005. No comments to the proposal were received. The rule is adopted as proposed. The coordinates for this airspace docket are based on North American Datum 83. Class E airspace area designations for airspace extending upward from the surface of the earth are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9M, dated August 30, 2004, and effective September 16, 2004, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designation listed in this document will be published in the Order. I VerDate jul<14>2003 15:26 Mar 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: PART 71—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; EO 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389. § 71.1 [Amended] The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation Administration Order 7400.9M, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 30, 2004, and effective September 16, 2004, is amended as follows: Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth. * * * * * AEA PA E5 Mifflintown, PA [New] Mifflintown Airport, Mifflintown, PA (Lat. 40°36′18″ N., long. 77°24′18″ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius of Mifflintown Airport, excluding the portion PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * * * * Issued in Jamaica, New York on March 3, 2005. John G. McCartney, Acting Area Director, Eastern Terminal Operations. [FR Doc. 05–4981 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–M DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 101 [Docket No. 2000N–1596] (formerly 00N– 1596) Uniform Compliance Date for Food Labeling Regulations AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is establishing January 1, 2008, as the uniform compliance date for food labeling regulations that are issued between March 14, 2005, and December 31, 2006. FDA periodically announces uniform compliance dates for new food labeling requirements to minimize the economic impact of label changes. On December 31, 2002, FDA established January 1, 2006, as the uniform compliance date for food labeling regulations that issued between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2004. DATES: This rule is effective March 14, 2005. Submit written or electronic comments May 31, 2005. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. 2000N–1596, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Agency Web site: https:// www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the agency Web site. • E-mail: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov. Include Docket No. 00N–1596 in the subject line of your e-mail message. • FAX: 301–827–6870. • Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions]: Division of Dockets Management (HFA– 305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM 14MRR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations Docket No. 2000N–1596 for this rulemaking. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ default.htm, including any personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Comments discussion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to https:// www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ default.htm and insert the docket number 2000N–1596, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the ‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louis B. Brock, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS–24), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301–436–2378. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA periodically issues regulations requiring changes in the labeling of food. If the effective dates of these labeling changes were not coordinated, the cumulative economic impact on the food industry of having to respond separately to each change would be substantial. Therefore, the agency periodically has announced uniform compliance dates for new food labeling requirements (see, e.g., the Federal Registers of October 19, 1984 (49 FR 41019), December 24, 1996 (61 FR 67710), December 27, 1996 (61 FR 68145), December 23, 1998 (63 FR 71015), November 20, 2000 (65 FR 69666), and December 31, 2002 (67 FR 79851)). Use of a uniform compliance date provides for an orderly and economical industry adjustment to new labeling requirements by allowing sufficient lead time to plan for the use of existing label inventories and the development of new labeling materials. This policy serves consumers’ interests as well because the cost of multiple short-term label revisions that would otherwise occur would likely be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.30(k) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. This final rule contains no collections of information. Therefore, clearance by VerDate jul<14>2003 15:26 Mar 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not required. FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4). Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that this final rule is not a significant regulatory action under the Executive order. The establishment of a uniform compliance date does not in itself lead to costs or benefits. We will assess the costs and benefits of the uniform compliance date in the regulatory impact analyses of the labeling rules that take effect at that date. The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule on small entities. Because the final rule does not impose compliance costs on small entities, the agency certifies that the final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year.’’ The current threshold after adjustment for inflation is $115 million, using the most current (2003) Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this final rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or exceed this amount. FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that the rule does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Accordingly, the agency has concluded that the rule does PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 12415 not contain policies that have federalism implications as defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a federalism summary impact statement is not required. This action is not intended to change existing requirements for compliance dates contained in final rules published before March 14, 2005. Therefore, all final FDA regulations published in the Federal Register before March 14, 2005, will still go into effect on the date stated in the respective final rule. The agency generally encourages industry to comply with new labeling regulations as quickly as feasible, however. Thus, when industry members voluntarily change their labels, it is appropriate that they incorporate any new requirements that have been published as final regulations up to that time. In rulemaking that began with publication of a proposal on April 15, 1996 (61 FR 16422), and ended with a final rule on December 24, 1996, FDA provided notice and an opportunity for comment on the practice of establishing uniform compliance dates by issuance of a final rule announcing the date. Receiving no comments objecting to this practice, FDA finds any further rulemaking unnecessary for establishment of the uniform compliance date. Nonetheless, under 21 CFR 10.40(e)(1), FDA is providing an opportunity for comment on whether this uniform compliance date should be modified or revoked. Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document. Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. After its review of any comments received to this final rule, FDA will either publish a document providing its conclusions concerning the comments or will initiate notice and comment rulemaking to modify or revoke the uniform compliance date established by this final rule. The new uniform compliance date will apply only to final FDA food labeling regulations that require changes in the labeling of food products and that publish after March 14, 2005, and before December 31, 2006. Those regulations will specifically identify January 1, 2008, as their compliance date. All food E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM 14MRR1 12416 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations products subject to the January 1, 2008, compliance date must comply with the appropriate regulations when initially introduced into interstate commerce on or after January 1, 2008. If any food labeling regulation involves special circumstances that justify a compliance date other than January 1, 2008, the agency will determine for that regulation an appropriate compliance date, which will be specified when the final regulation is published. Dated: March 8, 2005. Jeffrey Shuren, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 05–4956 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [CGD13–05–003] RIN 1625–AA87 Security Zone; Protection of Military Cargo, Captain of the Port Zone Puget Sound, WA Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of enforcement. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Captain of the Port Puget Sound will begin enforcing the Budd Inlet security zone in West Bay, Olympia, WA, on Friday, March 11, 2005 at 8 a.m. Pacific Standard Time. The security zone provides for the security of Department of Defense assets and military cargo in the navigable waters of Puget Sound and adjacent waters. The security zone will be enforced until Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Standard Time. DATES: The Budd Inlet security zone set forth in 33 CFR 165.1321 will be enforced from Friday, March 11, 2005 at 8 a.m. to Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Standard Time, at which time enforcement will be suspended. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Captain of the Port Puget Sound, 1519 Alaskan Way South, Seattle, WA 98134 at (206) 217–6200 or (800) 688–6664 to obtain information concerning enforcement of 33 CFR 165.1321. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 27, 2004, the Coast Guard published a final rule (69 FR 52603) establishing regulations, in 33 CFR 165.1321, for the security of Department of Defense assets and military cargo in the navigable waters of Puget Sound and adjacent VerDate jul<14>2003 15:26 Mar 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 waters. On December 10, 2004, the Coast Guard published a final rule (69 FR 71711), which amended 33 CFR 165.1321 by adding Budd Inlet, Olympia, WA as a permanent security zone. These security zones provide for the regulation of vessel traffic in the vicinity of military cargo loading facilities in the navigable waters of the United States. These security zones also exclude persons and vessels from the immediate vicinity of these facilities during military cargo loading and unloading operations. In addition, the regulation establishes requirements for all vessels to obtain permission of the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative, including the Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound (VTS) to enter, move within, or exit these security zones when they are enforced. Entry into these zones is prohibited unless otherwise exempted or excluded under 33 CFR 165.1321 or unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designee. The Captain of the Port Puget Sound will begin enforcing the Budd Inlet security zone established by 33 CFR 165.1321 on Friday, March 11, 2005 at 8 a.m. Pacific Standard Time. The security zone will be enforced until Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Standard Time. All persons and vessels are authorized to enter, move within, and exit the security zone on or after Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Standard Time unless a new notice of enforcement is issued before then. Ohio submitted this revision as a change to the SIP for NOX on June 28, 2004. In the direct final rule, EPA stated that if adverse comments were submitted by February 19, 2005, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. On February 18, 2005, EPA received a comment from a citizen and from the State of Ohio. EPA believes the comments are adverse and, therefore, EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule. EPA will address the comments in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed action also published on January 19, 2005 (70 FR 2992). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: The direct final rule published at 70 FR 2954 on January 19, 2005, is withdrawn as of March 14, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Paskevicz, Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, Telephone: (312) 886–6084. e-mail address: paskevicz.john@epa.gov. Dated: March 3, 2005. Danny Ellis, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound. [FR Doc. 05–4965 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am] PART 52—[AMENDED] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [R05–OAR–2004–OH–0003; FRL–7883–4] List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: March 1, 2005. Norman Niedergang, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. Accordingly, the amendment to 40 CFR 52.1870 published in the Federal Register on January 19, 2005 (70 FR 2954) on pages 2954—2959 are withdrawn as of March 14, 2005. I [FR Doc. 05–4899 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule 40 CFR Part 271 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule. Tennessee: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revision AGENCY: Due to the receipt of adverse comments the EPA is withdrawing the January 19, 2005 (70 FR 2954), direct final rule approving a revision to Ohio’s Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) State Implementation Plan (SIP). The State of SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 [FRL–7883–5] Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Immediate final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Tennessee has applied to EPA for Final authorization of the changes to its hazardous waste program under the E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM 14MRR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 48 (Monday, March 14, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12414-12416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4956]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 101

[Docket No. 2000N-1596] (formerly 00N-1596)


Uniform Compliance Date for Food Labeling Regulations

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is establishing January 
1, 2008, as the uniform compliance date for food labeling regulations 
that are issued between March 14, 2005, and December 31, 2006. FDA 
periodically announces uniform compliance dates for new food labeling 
requirements to minimize the economic impact of label changes. On 
December 31, 2002, FDA established January 1, 2006, as the uniform 
compliance date for food labeling regulations that issued between 
January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2004.

DATES: This rule is effective March 14, 2005. Submit written or 
electronic comments May 31, 2005.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. 2000N-
1596, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Agency Web site: https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the agency Web site.
     E-mail: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov. Include Docket No. 00N-1596 
in the subject line of your e-mail message.
     FAX: 301-827-6870.
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For paper, disk, or CD-ROM 
submissions]: Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and

[[Page 12415]]

Docket No. 2000N-1596 for this rulemaking. All comments received will 
be posted without change to https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm, including any personal information provided. For detailed 
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the 
rulemaking process, see the Comments discussion of the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION section of this document.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm 
and insert the docket number 2000N-1596, found in brackets in the 
heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the 
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers 
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louis B. Brock, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-24), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-436-2378.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA periodically issues regulations 
requiring changes in the labeling of food. If the effective dates of 
these labeling changes were not coordinated, the cumulative economic 
impact on the food industry of having to respond separately to each 
change would be substantial. Therefore, the agency periodically has 
announced uniform compliance dates for new food labeling requirements 
(see, e.g., the Federal Registers of October 19, 1984 (49 FR 41019), 
December 24, 1996 (61 FR 67710), December 27, 1996 (61 FR 68145), 
December 23, 1998 (63 FR 71015), November 20, 2000 (65 FR 69666), and 
December 31, 2002 (67 FR 79851)). Use of a uniform compliance date 
provides for an orderly and economical industry adjustment to new 
labeling requirements by allowing sufficient lead time to plan for the 
use of existing label inventories and the development of new labeling 
materials. This policy serves consumers' interests as well because the 
cost of multiple short-term label revisions that would otherwise occur 
would likely be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.30(k) that this action is 
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
    This final rule contains no collections of information. Therefore, 
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
    FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive 
Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and 
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). Executive 
Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of 
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to 
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including 
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other 
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that 
this final rule is not a significant regulatory action under the 
Executive order.
    The establishment of a uniform compliance date does not in itself 
lead to costs or benefits. We will assess the costs and benefits of the 
uniform compliance date in the regulatory impact analyses of the 
labeling rules that take effect at that date.
    The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze 
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule 
on small entities. Because the final rule does not impose compliance 
costs on small entities, the agency certifies that the final rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
    Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires 
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment 
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that 
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by 
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the 
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for 
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment 
for inflation is $115 million, using the most current (2003) Implicit 
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this 
final rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or 
exceed this amount.
    FDA has analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles 
set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that the rule 
does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government. Accordingly, the agency has concluded 
that the rule does not contain policies that have federalism 
implications as defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a 
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
    This action is not intended to change existing requirements for 
compliance dates contained in final rules published before March 14, 
2005. Therefore, all final FDA regulations published in the Federal 
Register before March 14, 2005, will still go into effect on the date 
stated in the respective final rule.
    The agency generally encourages industry to comply with new 
labeling regulations as quickly as feasible, however. Thus, when 
industry members voluntarily change their labels, it is appropriate 
that they incorporate any new requirements that have been published as 
final regulations up to that time.
    In rulemaking that began with publication of a proposal on April 
15, 1996 (61 FR 16422), and ended with a final rule on December 24, 
1996, FDA provided notice and an opportunity for comment on the 
practice of establishing uniform compliance dates by issuance of a 
final rule announcing the date. Receiving no comments objecting to this 
practice, FDA finds any further rulemaking unnecessary for 
establishment of the uniform compliance date. Nonetheless, under 21 CFR 
10.40(e)(1), FDA is providing an opportunity for comment on whether 
this uniform compliance date should be modified or revoked.
    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management 
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document. 
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any 
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. 
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets 
in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the 
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday 
through Friday. After its review of any comments received to this final 
rule, FDA will either publish a document providing its conclusions 
concerning the comments or will initiate notice and comment rulemaking 
to modify or revoke the uniform compliance date established by this 
final rule.
    The new uniform compliance date will apply only to final FDA food 
labeling regulations that require changes in the labeling of food 
products and that publish after March 14, 2005, and before December 31, 
2006. Those regulations will specifically identify January 1, 2008, as 
their compliance date. All food

[[Page 12416]]

products subject to the January 1, 2008, compliance date must comply 
with the appropriate regulations when initially introduced into 
interstate commerce on or after January 1, 2008. If any food labeling 
regulation involves special circumstances that justify a compliance 
date other than January 1, 2008, the agency will determine for that 
regulation an appropriate compliance date, which will be specified when 
the final regulation is published.

    Dated: March 8, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-4956 Filed 3-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.