Tennessee: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revision, 12416-12419 [05-4952]
Download as PDF
12416
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
products subject to the January 1, 2008,
compliance date must comply with the
appropriate regulations when initially
introduced into interstate commerce on
or after January 1, 2008. If any food
labeling regulation involves special
circumstances that justify a compliance
date other than January 1, 2008, the
agency will determine for that
regulation an appropriate compliance
date, which will be specified when the
final regulation is published.
Dated: March 8, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–4956 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD13–05–003]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Protection of Military
Cargo, Captain of the Port Zone Puget
Sound, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Captain of the Port Puget
Sound will begin enforcing the Budd
Inlet security zone in West Bay,
Olympia, WA, on Friday, March 11,
2005 at 8 a.m. Pacific Standard Time.
The security zone provides for the
security of Department of Defense assets
and military cargo in the navigable
waters of Puget Sound and adjacent
waters. The security zone will be
enforced until Tuesday, March 15, 2005
at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Standard Time.
DATES: The Budd Inlet security zone set
forth in 33 CFR 165.1321 will be
enforced from Friday, March 11, 2005 at
8 a.m. to Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at
11:59 p.m. Pacific Standard Time, at
which time enforcement will be
suspended.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Captain of the Port Puget Sound, 1519
Alaskan Way South, Seattle, WA 98134
at (206) 217–6200 or (800) 688–6664 to
obtain information concerning
enforcement of 33 CFR 165.1321.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
27, 2004, the Coast Guard published a
final rule (69 FR 52603) establishing
regulations, in 33 CFR 165.1321, for the
security of Department of Defense assets
and military cargo in the navigable
waters of Puget Sound and adjacent
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Mar 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
waters. On December 10, 2004, the
Coast Guard published a final rule (69
FR 71711), which amended 33 CFR
165.1321 by adding Budd Inlet,
Olympia, WA as a permanent security
zone. These security zones provide for
the regulation of vessel traffic in the
vicinity of military cargo loading
facilities in the navigable waters of the
United States. These security zones also
exclude persons and vessels from the
immediate vicinity of these facilities
during military cargo loading and
unloading operations. In addition, the
regulation establishes requirements for
all vessels to obtain permission of the
COTP or the COTP’s designated
representative, including the Vessel
Traffic Service Puget Sound (VTS) to
enter, move within, or exit these
security zones when they are enforced.
Entry into these zones is prohibited
unless otherwise exempted or excluded
under 33 CFR 165.1321 or unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designee.
The Captain of the Port Puget Sound
will begin enforcing the Budd Inlet
security zone established by 33 CFR
165.1321 on Friday, March 11, 2005 at
8 a.m. Pacific Standard Time. The
security zone will be enforced until
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 11:59 p.m.
Pacific Standard Time. All persons and
vessels are authorized to enter, move
within, and exit the security zone on or
after Tuesday, March 15, 2005 at 11:59
p.m. Pacific Standard Time unless a
new notice of enforcement is issued
before then.
Ohio submitted this revision as a change
to the SIP for NOX on June 28, 2004. In
the direct final rule, EPA stated that if
adverse comments were submitted by
February 19, 2005, the rule would be
withdrawn and not take effect. On
February 18, 2005, EPA received a
comment from a citizen and from the
State of Ohio. EPA believes the
comments are adverse and, therefore,
EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule.
EPA will address the comments in a
subsequent final action based upon the
proposed action also published on
January 19, 2005 (70 FR 2992). EPA will
not institute a second comment period
on this action.
DATES: The direct final rule published at
70 FR 2954 on January 19, 2005, is
withdrawn as of March 14, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Paskevicz, Engineer, Criteria Pollutant
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, Telephone:
(312) 886–6084. e-mail address:
paskevicz.john@epa.gov.
Dated: March 3, 2005.
Danny Ellis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 05–4965 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
PART 52—[AMENDED]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R05–OAR–2004–OH–0003; FRL–7883–4]
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 1, 2005.
Norman Niedergang,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
Accordingly, the amendment to 40
CFR 52.1870 published in the Federal
Register on January 19, 2005 (70 FR
2954) on pages 2954—2959 are
withdrawn as of March 14, 2005.
I
[FR Doc. 05–4899 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio;
Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule
40 CFR Part 271
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.
Tennessee: Final Authorization of
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
AGENCY:
Due to the receipt of adverse
comments the EPA is withdrawing the
January 19, 2005 (70 FR 2954), direct
final rule approving a revision to Ohio’s
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The State of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FRL–7883–5]
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Tennessee has applied to EPA
for Final authorization of the changes to
its hazardous waste program under the
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). EPA has determined that
these changes satisfy all requirements
needed to qualify for Final
authorization, and is authorizing the
State’s changes through this immediate
final action. EPA is publishing this rule
to authorize the changes without a prior
proposal because we believe this action
is not controversial and do not expect
comments that oppose it. Unless we get
written comments which oppose this
authorization during the comment
period, the decision to authorize
Tennessee’s changes to its hazardous
waste program will take effect. If we get
comments that oppose this action, we
will publish a document in the Federal
Register withdrawing this rule before it
takes effect and a separate document in
the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register will serve as a proposal
to authorize the changes.
DATES: This final authorization will
become effective on May 13, 2005,
unless EPA receives adverse written
comments by April 13, 2005. If EPA
receives such comments, it will publish
a timely withdrawal of this immediate
final rule in the Federal Register and
inform the public that this authorization
will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: gleaton.gwen@epa.gov
• Fax: (404) 562–8439 (prior to
faxing, please notify the EPA contact
listed below)
• Mail: Send written comments to
Gwen Gleaton at the address listed
below.
Instructions: Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov, or e-mail. The
federal regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your
comments. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit.
You can view and copy Tennessee’s
applications from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at
the following addresses: Tennessee
Department of Environment and
Conservation, Division of Solid Waste
Management, 5th Floor, L & C Tower,
401 Church Street, Nashville, Tennessee
37243–1535; and EPA, Region 4,
Library, 9th Floor, The Sam Nunn
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Mar 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–
3104; (404) 562–8190.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gwen Gleaton, RCRA Services Section,
RCRA Programs Branch, Waste
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, The Sam Nunn Atlanta
Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–3104; (404) 562–
8500.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why Are Revisions to State
Programs Necessary?
States which have received Final
authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. As the Federal program
changes, States must change their
programs and ask EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to State programs may
be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, States must
change their programs because of
changes to EPA’s regulations in 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279.
B. What Decisions Have We Made in
This Rule?
We conclude that Tennessee’s
application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and
regulatory requirements established by
RCRA. Therefore, we grant Tennessee
Final authorization to operate its
hazardous waste program with the
changes described in the authorization
application. Tennessee has
responsibility for permitting Treatment,
Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs)
within its borders (except in Indian
Country) and for carrying out the
aspects of the RCRA program described
in its revised program application,
subject to the limitations of the
Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). New
Federal requirements and prohibitions
imposed by Federal regulations that
EPA promulgates under the authority of
HSWA take effect in authorized States
before they are authorized for the
requirements. Thus, EPA will
implement those requirements and
prohibitions in Tennessee, including
issuing permits, until the State is
granted authorization to do so.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12417
C. What Is the Effect of Today’s
Authorization Decision?
The effect of this decision is that a
facility in Tennessee subject to RCRA
will now have to comply with the
authorized State requirements instead of
the equivalent Federal requirements in
order to comply with RCRA. Tennessee
has enforcement responsibilities under
its State hazardous waste program for
violations of such program, but EPA
retains its authority under RCRA
sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,
which include, among others, authority
to:
• Do inspections, and require
monitoring, tests, analyses or reports
• Enforce RCRA requirements and
suspend or revoke permits
• Take enforcement actions regardless
of whether the State has taken its own
actions
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the
regulations for which Tennessee are
being authorized by today’s action are
already effective, and are not changed
by today’s action.
D. Why Wasn’t There a Proposed Rule
Before Today’s Rule?
EPA did not publish a proposal before
today’s rule because we view this as a
routine program change and do not
expect comments that oppose this
approval. We are providing an
opportunity for public comment now. In
addition to this rule, in the proposed
rules section of today’s Federal
Register, we are publishing a separate
document that proposes to authorize the
State program changes.
E. What Happens if EPA Receives
Comments That Oppose This Action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose
this authorization, we will withdraw
this rule by publishing a document in
the Federal Register before the rule
becomes effective. EPA will base any
further decision on the authorization of
the State program changes on the
proposal mentioned in the previous
paragraph. We will then address all
public comments in a later final rule.
You may not have another opportunity
to comment. If you want to comment on
this authorization, you must do so at
this time.
If we receive comments that oppose
only the authorization of a particular
change to the State hazardous waste
program, we will withdraw that part of
this rule but the authorization of the
program changes that the comments do
not oppose will become effective on the
date specified above. The Federal
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
12418
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Register withdrawal document will
specify which part of the authorization
will become effective, and which part is
being withdrawn.
F. What Has Tennessee Previously Been
Authorized for?
Tennessee initially received final
authorization on January 22, 1985,
effective February 5, 1985 (50 FR 2820)
to implement the RCRA hazardous
waste management program. We granted
authorization for changes to Tennessee’s
program on December 8, 2004, effective
February 7, 2005 (69 FR 70898), April
11, 2003, effective June 10, 2003 (68 FR
17748), December 26, 2001, effective
February 25, 2002 (66 FR 66342),
October 26, 2000, effective December
26, 2000 (65 FR 64161), September 15,
1999, effective November 15, 1999 (64
FR 49998), January 30, 1998, effective
March 31, 1998 (63 FR 45870), on May
23, 1996, effective July 22, 1996 (61 FR
25796), on August 24, 1995, effective
October 23, 1995 (60 FR 43979), on May
8, 1995, effective July 7, 1995 (60 FR
22524), on June 1, 1992, effective July
31, 1992 (57 FR 23063), and on June 12,
1987, effective August 11, 1987 (52 FR
22443).
G. What Changes Are We Authorizing
With Today’s Action?
On December 27, 2004, Tennessee
submitted final complete program
revision applications, seeking
authorization of its changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. We
now make an immediate final decision,
subject to receipt of comments that
oppose this action, that Tennessee’s
hazardous waste program revision
satisfies all of the requirements
necessary to qualify for final
authorization. Therefore, we grant final
authorization for the following program
changes:
Description of federal requirement
Federal Register
date and page
Analogous state authority 1
200—Zinc Fertilizer Rule ........................
67 FR 48393 .........
07/24/02 .................
201—Treatment Variance for Radioactively Contaminated Batteries.
202—Hazardous Air Pollutant Standards
for Combustors—Corrections 2.
67 FR 62618 .........
10/07/02 .................
67 FR 77687 .........
12/19/02 .................
Tennessee
Revised
Code
1200–1–11–.02(1)(d),
02(1)(d)1(xxii),
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(I) & (II), .02(1)(d)1(xxii)(II)I & II, .02(1)(d)1(xxii)(II)II.A–II.C,
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(II)III–IV,
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(II)IV.A–IV.C,
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(III),
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(III)I–IV,
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(IV)–(V),
.02(1)(d)1(xxiii),
.02(1)(d)1(xxiii)I,
.02(1)(d)1(xxiii)
I–II,
.02(1)(d)1(xxiii)(II)–(III),
.02(1)(d)1(xxiii)(III) I–VI, .09(3)(a)2 & 4, .09(3)(a)4(i) & (ii), .10(3)(a)9.
Tennessee Revised Code 1200–1–11–.10(3)(a)Table.
1 The
Tennessee Revised Code 1200–1–11–.07(5)(b)5(v), .07(5)(b)8, .07(1)(e),
.07(1)(j).
Tennessee provisions are from the Tennessee Hazardous Waste Management Regulations effective September 6, 2004.
H. Where Are the Revised State Rules
Different From the Federal Rules?
There are no State requirements that
are more stringent or broader in scope
than the Federal requirements.
I. Who Handles Permits After the
Authorization Takes Effect?
Tennessee will issue permits for all
the provisions for which it is authorized
and will administer the permits it
issues. EPA will continue to administer
any RCRA hazardous waste permits or
portions of permits which we issued
prior to the effective date of this
authorization. At the time the State
program is approved, EPA will suspend
issuance of Federal permits in the State.
EPA will transfer any pending permit
applications, completed permits or
pertinent file information to the State
within thirty days of the approval of the
State program. We will not issue any
more new permits or new portions of
permits for the provisions listed in the
Table above after the effective date of
this authorization. EPA will continue to
implement and issue permits for HSWA
requirements for which Tennessee is not
yet authorized.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Mar 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
J. How Does Today’s Action Affect
Indian Country (18 U.S.C. 115) in
Tennessee?
The State of Tennessee’s Hazardous
Waste Program is not being authorized
to operate in Indian Country.
K. What Is Codification and Is EPA
Codifying Tennessee’s Hazardous
Waste Program as Authorized in This
Rule?
Codification is the process of placing
the State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the Code
of Federal Regulations. We do this by
referencing the authorized State rules in
40 CFR part 272. We reserve the
amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart
RR for this authorization of Tennessee’s
program changes until a later date.
L. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget
has exempted this action from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and
therefore this action is not subject to
review by OMB. This action authorizes
State requirements for the purpose of
RCRA section 3006 and imposes no
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. Accordingly, I
certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action
authorizes pre-existing requirements
under State law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by State law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Public Law 104–4). For the same
reason, this action also does not
significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as
specified by Executive Order 13084 (63
FR 27655, May 10, 1998). This action
will not have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely authorizes State requirements as
part of the State RCRA hazardous waste
program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
RCRA. This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks.
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 48 / Monday, March 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Under RCRA section 3006(b), EPA
grants a State’s application for
authorization as long as the State meets
the criteria required by RCRA. It would
thus be inconsistent with applicable law
for EPA, when it reviews a State
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, EPA has taken the necessary
steps to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR
8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:26 Mar 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
accordance with the ‘‘Attorney
General’s Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under
the Executive Order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12419
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective May 13, 2005.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous materials transportation,
Hazardous waste, Indians-lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006 and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: February 25, 2005.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 05–4952 Filed 3–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 48 (Monday, March 14, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12416-12419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4952]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[FRL-7883-5]
Tennessee: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste
Management Program Revision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Tennessee has applied to EPA for Final authorization of the
changes to its hazardous waste program under the
[[Page 12417]]
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA has determined that
these changes satisfy all requirements needed to qualify for Final
authorization, and is authorizing the State's changes through this
immediate final action. EPA is publishing this rule to authorize the
changes without a prior proposal because we believe this action is not
controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. Unless we get
written comments which oppose this authorization during the comment
period, the decision to authorize Tennessee's changes to its hazardous
waste program will take effect. If we get comments that oppose this
action, we will publish a document in the Federal Register withdrawing
this rule before it takes effect and a separate document in the
proposed rules section of this Federal Register will serve as a
proposal to authorize the changes.
DATES: This final authorization will become effective on May 13, 2005,
unless EPA receives adverse written comments by April 13, 2005. If EPA
receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of this
immediate final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that
this authorization will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: gleaton.gwen@epa.gov
Fax: (404) 562-8439 ( prior to faxing, please notify the
EPA contact listed below)
Mail: Send written comments to Gwen Gleaton at the address
listed below.
Instructions: Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov, or e-mail.
The federal regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comments. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or
CD-ROM you submit.
You can view and copy Tennessee's applications from 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. at the following addresses: Tennessee Department of Environment
and Conservation, Division of Solid Waste Management, 5th Floor, L & C
Tower, 401 Church Street, Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1535; and EPA,
Region 4, Library, 9th Floor, The Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104; (404) 562-8190.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gwen Gleaton, RCRA Services Section,
RCRA Programs Branch, Waste Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, The Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104; (404) 562-8500.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why Are Revisions to State Programs Necessary?
States which have received Final authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste
program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes, States must
change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to
State programs may be necessary when Federal or State statutory or
regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes occur.
Most commonly, States must change their programs because of changes to
EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279.
B. What Decisions Have We Made in This Rule?
We conclude that Tennessee's application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and regulatory requirements
established by RCRA. Therefore, we grant Tennessee Final authorization
to operate its hazardous waste program with the changes described in
the authorization application. Tennessee has responsibility for
permitting Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) within
its borders (except in Indian Country) and for carrying out the aspects
of the RCRA program described in its revised program application,
subject to the limitations of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments
of 1984 (HSWA). New Federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by
Federal regulations that EPA promulgates under the authority of HSWA
take effect in authorized States before they are authorized for the
requirements. Thus, EPA will implement those requirements and
prohibitions in Tennessee, including issuing permits, until the State
is granted authorization to do so.
C. What Is the Effect of Today's Authorization Decision?
The effect of this decision is that a facility in Tennessee subject
to RCRA will now have to comply with the authorized State requirements
instead of the equivalent Federal requirements in order to comply with
RCRA. Tennessee has enforcement responsibilities under its State
hazardous waste program for violations of such program, but EPA retains
its authority under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, which
include, among others, authority to:
Do inspections, and require monitoring, tests, analyses or
reports
Enforce RCRA requirements and suspend or revoke permits
Take enforcement actions regardless of whether the State
has taken its own actions
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations for which Tennessee are
being authorized by today's action are already effective, and are not
changed by today's action.
D. Why Wasn't There a Proposed Rule Before Today's Rule?
EPA did not publish a proposal before today's rule because we view
this as a routine program change and do not expect comments that oppose
this approval. We are providing an opportunity for public comment now.
In addition to this rule, in the proposed rules section of today's
Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document that proposes
to authorize the State program changes.
E. What Happens if EPA Receives Comments That Oppose This Action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose this authorization, we will
withdraw this rule by publishing a document in the Federal Register
before the rule becomes effective. EPA will base any further decision
on the authorization of the State program changes on the proposal
mentioned in the previous paragraph. We will then address all public
comments in a later final rule. You may not have another opportunity to
comment. If you want to comment on this authorization, you must do so
at this time.
If we receive comments that oppose only the authorization of a
particular change to the State hazardous waste program, we will
withdraw that part of this rule but the authorization of the program
changes that the comments do not oppose will become effective on the
date specified above. The Federal
[[Page 12418]]
Register withdrawal document will specify which part of the
authorization will become effective, and which part is being withdrawn.
F. What Has Tennessee Previously Been Authorized for?
Tennessee initially received final authorization on January 22,
1985, effective February 5, 1985 (50 FR 2820) to implement the RCRA
hazardous waste management program. We granted authorization for
changes to Tennessee's program on December 8, 2004, effective February
7, 2005 (69 FR 70898), April 11, 2003, effective June 10, 2003 (68 FR
17748), December 26, 2001, effective February 25, 2002 (66 FR 66342),
October 26, 2000, effective December 26, 2000 (65 FR 64161), September
15, 1999, effective November 15, 1999 (64 FR 49998), January 30, 1998,
effective March 31, 1998 (63 FR 45870), on May 23, 1996, effective July
22, 1996 (61 FR 25796), on August 24, 1995, effective October 23, 1995
(60 FR 43979), on May 8, 1995, effective July 7, 1995 (60 FR 22524), on
June 1, 1992, effective July 31, 1992 (57 FR 23063), and on June 12,
1987, effective August 11, 1987 (52 FR 22443).
G. What Changes Are We Authorizing With Today's Action?
On December 27, 2004, Tennessee submitted final complete program
revision applications, seeking authorization of its changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. We now make an immediate final decision,
subject to receipt of comments that oppose this action, that
Tennessee's hazardous waste program revision satisfies all of the
requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization. Therefore,
we grant final authorization for the following program changes:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of federal Federal Register Analogous state
requirement date and page authority \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
200--Zinc Fertilizer Rule..... 67 FR 48393...... Tennessee Revised
07/24/02......... Code 1200-1-11-
.02(1)(d),
02(1)(d)1(xxii),
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(I)
& (II),
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(II)
I & II,
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(II)
II.A-II.C,
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(II)
III-IV,
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(II)
IV.A-IV.C,
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(III
),
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(III
)I-IV,
.02(1)(d)1(xxii)(IV)
-(V),
.02(1)(d)1(xxiii),
.02(1)(d)1(xxiii)I,
.02(1)(d)1(xxiii) I-
II,
.02(1)(d)1(xxiii)(II
)-(III),
.02(1)(d)1(xxiii)(II
I) I-VI, .09(3)(a)2
& 4, .09(3)(a)4(i) &
(ii), .10(3)(a)9.
201--Treatment Variance for 67 FR 62618...... Tennessee Revised
Radioactively Contaminated 10/07/02......... Code 1200-1-11-
Batteries. .10(3)(a)Table.
202--Hazardous Air Pollutant 67 FR 77687...... Tennessee Revised
Standards for Combustors-- 12/19/02......... Code 1200-1-11-
Corrections 2. .07(5)(b)5(v),
.07(5)(b)8,
.07(1)(e),
.07(1)(j).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Tennessee provisions are from the Tennessee Hazardous Waste
Management Regulations effective September 6, 2004.
H. Where Are the Revised State Rules Different From the Federal Rules?
There are no State requirements that are more stringent or broader
in scope than the Federal requirements.
I. Who Handles Permits After the Authorization Takes Effect?
Tennessee will issue permits for all the provisions for which it is
authorized and will administer the permits it issues. EPA will continue
to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or portions of permits
which we issued prior to the effective date of this authorization. At
the time the State program is approved, EPA will suspend issuance of
Federal permits in the State. EPA will transfer any pending permit
applications, completed permits or pertinent file information to the
State within thirty days of the approval of the State program. We will
not issue any more new permits or new portions of permits for the
provisions listed in the Table above after the effective date of this
authorization. EPA will continue to implement and issue permits for
HSWA requirements for which Tennessee is not yet authorized.
J. How Does Today's Action Affect Indian Country (18 U.S.C. 115) in
Tennessee?
The State of Tennessee's Hazardous Waste Program is not being
authorized to operate in Indian Country.
K. What Is Codification and Is EPA Codifying Tennessee's Hazardous
Waste Program as Authorized in This Rule?
Codification is the process of placing the State's statutes and
regulations that comprise the State's authorized hazardous waste
program into the Code of Federal Regulations. We do this by referencing
the authorized State rules in 40 CFR part 272. We reserve the amendment
of 40 CFR part 272, subpart RR for this authorization of Tennessee's
program changes until a later date.
L. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from
the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993), and therefore this action is not subject to review by OMB. This
action authorizes State requirements for the purpose of RCRA section
3006 and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. Accordingly, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this action authorizes pre-existing requirements under State law and
does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). For the same reason,
this action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order
13084 (63 FR 27655, May 10, 1998). This action will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999),
because it merely authorizes State requirements as part of the State
RCRA hazardous waste program without altering the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established by RCRA. This
action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental health or safety risks.
[[Page 12419]]
Under RCRA section 3006(b), EPA grants a State's application for
authorization as long as the State meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it
reviews a State authorization application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in issuing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining
the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the Executive Order.
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective May 13, 2005.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous materials transportation,
Hazardous waste, Indians-lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections
2002(a), 3006 and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended
42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: February 25, 2005.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 05-4952 Filed 3-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P