Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, -100B, -100B SUD, -200B, -200C, -200F, and -300 Series Airplanes; and Model 747SP and 747SR Series Airplanes; Equipped With Pratt and Whitney Model JT9D-3 or -7 (Except -70) Series Engines, 12115-12117 [05-4411]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 47 / Friday, March 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
and consequent rapid decompression of the
airplane fuselage.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
One-Time Inspection/Investigative and
Corrective Actions
(f) Before the accumulation of 4,000 total
flight cycles, or within 1,000 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
is later: Perform a detailed inspection for
discrepancies of the fuselage frame to tension
tie joints at BS 1120 through BS 1220, and
to determine if steel splice plates are
installed on the fuselage frames. Do the
inspection in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 747–53–
2483, Revision 1, dated August 28, 2003. Do
any applicable investigative and corrective
actions before further flight in accordance
with the service bulletin, except as provided
by paragraph (h) of this AD.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive visual
examination of a specific structural area,
system, installation, or assembly to detect
damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a
direct source of good lighting at intensity
deemed appropriate by the inspector.
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning
and elaborate access procedures may be
required.’’
Determining Number of Flight Cycles for
Compliance Time
(g) For the purposes of calculating the
compliance threshold for the actions required
by paragraph (f) of this AD, all pressurized
flight cycles, including the number of flight
cycles in which cabin differential pressure is
at 2.0 pounds per square inch (psi) or less,
must be counted when determining the
number of flight cycles that have occurred on
the airplane. Where the service bulletin and
this AD differ, the AD prevails.
Repair Requirements
(h) For any repairs outside the limits of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
747–53–2483, Revision 1, dated August 28,
2003, or if any aluminum splice plate is
installed on the fuselage frames: Before
further flight, repair or replace, as applicable,
in accordance with a method approved by
the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA; or in accordance with
data meeting the certification basis of the
airplane approved by an Authorized
Representative for the Boeing Delegation
Option Authorization Organization who has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair or
replacement method to be approved, as
required by this paragraph, the approval
must specifically refer to this AD.
AD in accordance with Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 747–53–2483,
dated October 24, 2002, are considered
acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding actions specified in this AD.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
No Reporting Requirements
[Docket No. FAA–2004–19812; Directorate
Identifier 2003–NM–197–AD; Amendment
39–13996; AD 2005–05–07]
(j) Although the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 747–53–2483, Revision 1,
dated August 28, 2003; describe procedures
for submitting certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not require that
action.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(k)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Delegation Option Authorization
Organization who has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those
findings. For a repair method to be approved,
the repair must meet the certification basis of
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 747–53–2483, Revision 1,
dated August 28, 2003, to perform the actions
that are required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise. The Director of the
Federal Register approves the incorporation
by reference of this document in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. For
copies of the service information, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box
3707, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207. For
information on the availability of this
material at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA), call (202)
741–6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html. You may view the AD
docket at the Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., room PL–401, Nassif
Building, Washington, DC.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
28, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–4410 Filed 3–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Actions Accomplished Per Previous Issue of
Service Bulletin
(i) Inspections and corrective actions
accomplished before the effective date of this
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:11 Mar 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
12115
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 747–100, –100B, –100B SUD,
–200B, –200C, –200F, and –300 Series
Airplanes; and Model 747SP and
747SR Series Airplanes; Equipped
With Pratt and Whitney Model JT9D–3
or –7 (Except –70) Series Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing transport category airplanes.
This AD requires repetitive detailed
inspections to detect cracking of the aft
and forward surfaces of the bulkhead
web at nacelle station 180, and repair if
necessary. This AD is prompted by
reports of cracking of the web bulkhead
at nacelle station 180. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the web bulkhead, and
consequent loss of the load path of the
bulkhead at nacelle station 180, which
when combined with the loss of the
midspar load path, could result in the
in-flight separation of the engine and
strut. Such separation may result in
secondary damage to the airplane and
consequent reduced controllability of
the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective April
15, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the AD is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of April 15, 2005.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207.
Docket: The AD docket contains the
proposed AD, comments, and any final
disposition. You can examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at
the U.S. Department of Transportation,
400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401,
Washington, DC. This docket number is
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
12116
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 47 / Friday, March 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
FAA–2004–19812; the directorate
identifier for this docket is 2003–NM–
197–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tamara Anderson, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055–4056; telephone
(425) 917–6421; fax (425) 917–6590.
The FAA
proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39 with
an AD for certain Boeing Model 747–
100, –100B, –100B SUD, –200B, –200C,
–200F, and –300 series airplanes; and
Model 747SP and 747SR series
airplanes; equipped with Pratt and
Whitney Model JT9D–3 or –7 (except
–70) series engines. That action,
published in the Federal Register on
December 8, 2004 (69 FR 70936),
proposed to require repetitive detailed
inspections to detect cracking of the aft
and forward surfaces of the bulkhead
web at nacelle station 180, and repair if
necessary.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. No comments
have been submitted on the proposed
AD or on the determination of the cost
to the public.
Explanation of Change to Proposed AD
Boeing has received a Delegation
Option Authorization (DOA). We have
revised this final rule to delegate the
authority to approve an alternative
method of compliance for any repair
required by this AD to the Authorized
Representative for the Boeing DOA
Organization rather than the Designated
Engineering Representative.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data and determined that air
safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD with the change
described previously. We have
determined that this change will neither
increase the economic burden on any
operator nor increase the scope of the
AD.
This AD will affect about 223
airplanes worldwide and 73 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The required actions will
take about 1 work hour per airplane, at
an average labor rate of $65 per work
hour. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the AD for U.S.
operators is $4,745, or $65 per airplane,
per inspection cycle.
17:11 Mar 10, 2005
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for
a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Costs of Compliance
VerDate jul<14>2003
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Jkt 205001
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
I
2005–05–07 Boeing: Amendment 39–13996.
Docket No. FAA–2004–19812;
Directorate Identifier 2003–NM–197–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective April 15,
2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747–
100, –100B, –100B SUD, –200B, –200C,
–200F, and –300 series airplanes; and Model
747SP and 747SR series airplanes; equipped
with Pratt and Whitney Model JT9D–3, or –7
(except for –70) series engines; as identified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
54A2220, dated July 31, 2003; certificated in
any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by reports of
cracking of the web bulkhead at nacelle
station 180. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct fatigue cracking of the web
bulkhead, and consequent loss of the load
path of the bulkhead at nacelle station 180,
which when combined with the loss of the
midspar load path, could result in the inflight separation of the engine and strut. Such
separation may result in secondary damage to
the airplane and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections and Repair
(f) Within 9 months after the effective date
of this AD, do a detailed inspection to detect
cracking of the aft and forward surfaces of the
bulkhead web at nacelle station 180, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747–54A2220, dated July 31, 2003.
(1) If no cracking is detected, repeat the
detailed inspection at the applicable intervals
specified in the ‘‘Repeat Inspection Interval’’
column of Tables 1 and 2 in Figure 1 of the
service bulletin.
(2) If any cracking is detected, before
further flight, repair the cracking in
accordance with the service bulletin, except
as provided by paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
Thereafter, repeat the detailed inspection at
the applicable intervals specified in the
‘‘Repeat Inspection Interval’’ column of
Tables 1 and 2 in Figure 1 of the service
bulletin.
(3) If any cracking exceeds the repair limits
specified in the applicable structural repair
manual (referenced in the service bulletin),
before further flight, repair the cracking in
accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 47 / Friday, March 11, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(ACO), FAA; or in accordance with data
meeting the certification basis of the airplane
approved by an Authorized Representative
(AR) for the Boeing Delegation Option
Authorization (DOA) Organization who has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–600R
Series Airplanes, and Model C4–605R
Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called
A300–600); and Model A310 Series
Airplanes; Equipped With Certain
Honeywell Inertial Reference Units
(IRU)
(g)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested in accordance with the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
AR for the Boeing DOA Organization who
has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(h) You must use Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–54A2220, dated July 31, 2003,
to perform the actions that are required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
The Director of the Federal Register approves
the incorporation by reference of this
document in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. For copies of the service
information, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207. For information on
the availability of this material at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA), call (202) 741–6030,
or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html. You may view the AD
docket at the Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW, room PL–401, Nassif
Building, Washington, DC.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
28, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–4411 Filed 3–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:11 Mar 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2004–19537; Directorate
Identifier 2004–NM–145–AD; Amendment
39–13993; AD 2005–05–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R,
and F4–600R series airplanes, and
Model C4–605R Variant F airplanes
(collectively called A300–600); and
Model A310 series airplanes; equipped
with certain Honeywell inertial
reference units (IRUs). This AD requires
revising the Limitations section of the
airplane flight manual to prohibit the
use of CAT 2 and CAT 3 automatic
landing and rollout procedures at
certain airports. This AD is prompted by
a report that some magnetic deviation
tables in the IRU database are obsolete
and contain significant differences with
the real magnetic deviations. We are
issuing this AD to prevent an airplane
from deviating from the runway
centerline, and possibly departing the
runway.
This AD becomes effective April
15, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the AD is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of April 15, 2005.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Airbus, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France.
Docket: The AD docket contains the
proposed AD, comments, and any final
disposition. You can examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Management Facility office
(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at
the U.S. Department of Transportation,
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12117
400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401,
Washington, DC. This docket number is
FAA–2004–19537; the directorate
identifier for this docket is 2004–NM–
145–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Backman, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2797;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 with
an AD for all Airbus Model A300 B4–
600, B4–600R, and F4–600R series
airplanes, and Model C4–605R Variant F
airplanes (collectively called A300–
600); and Model A310 series airplanes;
equipped with certain Honeywell
inertial reference units (IRUs). That
action, published in the Federal
Register on November 5, 2004 (69 FR
64520), proposed to require revising the
Limitations section of the airplane flight
manual (AFM) to prohibit the use of
CAT 2 and CAT 3 automatic landing
and rollout procedures at certain
airports.
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have
considered the comment that has been
submitted on the proposed AD. The
commenter supports the proposed AD.
Explanation of Changes Made to This
Final Rule
We have revised Table 2 of this AD
to more clearly identify the applicable
airplane flight manuals (AFM) to be
revised.
In Table 2 of the proposed AD we
referenced an incorrect date for the
temporary revisions. We have revised
Table 2 of this final rule to correct that
information.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data, including the comment
that has been submitted, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed, with the changes described
previously. We have determined that
these changes will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor
increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
This AD will affect about 136
airplanes of U.S. registry. The AFM
revision will take about 1 work hour per
airplane, at an average labor rate of $65
per work hour. Based on these figures,
E:\FR\FM\11MRR1.SGM
11MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 47 (Friday, March 11, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12115-12117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4411]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2004-19812; Directorate Identifier 2003-NM-197-AD;
Amendment 39-13996; AD 2005-05-07]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, -100B, -100B SUD,
-200B, -200C, -200F, and -300 Series Airplanes; and Model 747SP and
747SR Series Airplanes; Equipped With Pratt and Whitney Model JT9D-3 or
-7 (Except -70) Series Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing transport category airplanes. This AD requires
repetitive detailed inspections to detect cracking of the aft and
forward surfaces of the bulkhead web at nacelle station 180, and repair
if necessary. This AD is prompted by reports of cracking of the web
bulkhead at nacelle station 180. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct fatigue cracking of the web bulkhead, and consequent loss of
the load path of the bulkhead at nacelle station 180, which when
combined with the loss of the midspar load path, could result in the
in-flight separation of the engine and strut. Such separation may
result in secondary damage to the airplane and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective April 15, 2005.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the AD is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of April
15, 2005.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.
Docket: The AD docket contains the proposed AD, comments, and any
final disposition. You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-401,
Washington, DC. This docket number is
[[Page 12116]]
FAA-2004-19812; the directorate identifier for this docket is 2003-NM-
197-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamara Anderson, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
917-6421; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39
with an AD for certain Boeing Model 747-100, -100B, -100B SUD, -200B, -
200C, -200F, and -300 series airplanes; and Model 747SP and 747SR
series airplanes; equipped with Pratt and Whitney Model JT9D-3 or -7
(except -70) series engines. That action, published in the Federal
Register on December 8, 2004 (69 FR 70936), proposed to require
repetitive detailed inspections to detect cracking of the aft and
forward surfaces of the bulkhead web at nacelle station 180, and repair
if necessary.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. No comments have been submitted on the proposed
AD or on the determination of the cost to the public.
Explanation of Change to Proposed AD
Boeing has received a Delegation Option Authorization (DOA). We
have revised this final rule to delegate the authority to approve an
alternative method of compliance for any repair required by this AD to
the Authorized Representative for the Boeing DOA Organization rather
than the Designated Engineering Representative.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the
change described previously. We have determined that this change will
neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the
scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
This AD will affect about 223 airplanes worldwide and 73 airplanes
of U.S. registry. The required actions will take about 1 work hour per
airplane, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the AD for U.S. operators is $4,745, or
$65 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to
examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2005-05-07 Boeing: Amendment 39-13996. Docket No. FAA-2004-19812;
Directorate Identifier 2003-NM-197-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective April 15, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747-100, -100B, -100B SUD, -
200B, -200C, -200F, and -300 series airplanes; and Model 747SP and
747SR series airplanes; equipped with Pratt and Whitney Model JT9D-
3, or -7 (except for -70) series engines; as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-54A2220, dated July 31, 2003;
certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by reports of cracking of the web
bulkhead at nacelle station 180. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct fatigue cracking of the web bulkhead, and consequent
loss of the load path of the bulkhead at nacelle station 180, which
when combined with the loss of the midspar load path, could result
in the in-flight separation of the engine and strut. Such separation
may result in secondary damage to the airplane and consequent
reduced controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Inspections and Repair
(f) Within 9 months after the effective date of this AD, do a
detailed inspection to detect cracking of the aft and forward
surfaces of the bulkhead web at nacelle station 180, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-54A2220, dated July 31, 2003.
(1) If no cracking is detected, repeat the detailed inspection
at the applicable intervals specified in the ``Repeat Inspection
Interval'' column of Tables 1 and 2 in Figure 1 of the service
bulletin.
(2) If any cracking is detected, before further flight, repair
the cracking in accordance with the service bulletin, except as
provided by paragraph (f)(3) of this AD. Thereafter, repeat the
detailed inspection at the applicable intervals specified in the
``Repeat Inspection Interval'' column of Tables 1 and 2 in Figure 1
of the service bulletin.
(3) If any cracking exceeds the repair limits specified in the
applicable structural repair manual (referenced in the service
bulletin), before further flight, repair the cracking in accordance
with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office
[[Page 12117]]
(ACO), FAA; or in accordance with data meeting the certification
basis of the airplane approved by an Authorized Representative (AR)
for the Boeing Delegation Option Authorization (DOA) Organization
who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those
findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an AR
for the Boeing DOA Organization who has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(h) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-54A2220,
dated July 31, 2003, to perform the actions that are required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the
Federal Register approves the incorporation by reference of this
document in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. For
copies of the service information, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. For
information on the availability of this material at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA), call (202) 741-6030, or
go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. You may view the AD docket at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW, room PL-401, Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 28, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-4411 Filed 3-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P