Electronic Filing-Annual Financial and Actuarial Information, 11540-11546 [05-4623]
Download as PDF
11540
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
required for the current year. The final
rule will strengthen the defined benefit
system and enhance the PBGC’s ability
to carry out its mission effectively and
efficiently.
Amendment to CBP Regulations
DATES: Effective Date: April 8, 2005. For
a discussion of applicability of the
I For the reasons set forth above, part 12
of the CBP Regulations (19 CFR part 12), amendments, see the Applicability
section in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
is amended as set forth below:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PART 12—SPECIAL CLASSES OF
James J. Armbruster, Acting Director,
MERCHANDISE
Legislative & Regulatory Department, or
James L. Beller, Attorney, Legislative &
I 1. The general authority citation for
part 12 and the specific authority citation Regulatory Department, PBGC, 1200 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005–
for § 12.104g are revised to read as
4026; (202) 326–4024. (TTY/TDD users
follows:
may call the Federal relay service tollAuthority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 free at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to be
(General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff
connected to (202) 326–4024.)
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)),
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
1624;
December 28, 2004 (at 69 FR 77679), the
*
*
*
*
*
PBGC published a proposed rule
Sections 12.104 through 12.104i also
modifying 29 CFR part 4010 of the
issued under 19 U.S.C. 2612;
PBGC’s regulations (Annual Financial
*
*
*
*
*
and Actuarial Information Reporting).
(The PBGC published a correction on
§ 12.104 [Amended]
January 12, 2005 (at 70 FR 2080)). The
I 2. In § 12.104g(a), the table of the list
PBGC received seven comment letters
of agreements imposing import
on the proposed rule (which are
restrictions on described articles of
addressed below) and is issuing the
cultural property of State Parties is
final regulation with three
amended in the entry for El Salvador by modifications: (1) The proposed
removing the reference to ‘‘T.D. 00–16’’
requirement to provide identifying
and adding in its place ‘‘CBP Dec. 05–
information on exempt entities is
10’’ in the column headed ‘‘Decision
eliminated; (2) for the first year this rule
No.’’.
is in effect, filers may submit their
reports by providing the information in
Robert C. Bonner,
an electronic format specified on the
Commissioner, Customs and Border
PBGC’s Web site, rather than
Protection.
exclusively through the PBGC’s WebTimothy E. Skud,
based software application, and (3) for
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
that first year, companies may continue
[FR Doc. 05–4625 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am]
to use the optional assumptions method
BILLING CODE 4820–02–P
to determine whether filing is required.
There are other minor modifications, as
noted below.
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
This rule is part of the Pension
CORPORATION
Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s (PBGC’s)
ongoing effort to streamline regulation
29 CFR Parts 4000 and 4010
and to improve administration of the
RIN 1212–AB01
pension insurance program, with a
focus on making pension-related data
Electronic Filing—Annual Financial
more accurate, complete, timely, and—
and Actuarial Information
in particular—transparent. It is also part
of the PBGC’s ongoing implementation
AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty
of the Government Paperwork
Corporation.
Elimination Act and is consistent with
ACTION: Final rule.
the Office of Management and Budget’s
SUMMARY: The PBGC is amending its
directive to remove regulatory
regulation on Annual Financial and
impediments to electronic transactions.
Actuarial Information Reporting to
The rule builds in the flexibility needed
require: Electronic filing in a
to allow the PBGC to update the
standardized format of certain
electronic filing process as technology
identifying, financial, and actuarial
advances.
The PBGC administers the pension
information and the filing of additional
items of supporting information that are insurance programs under Title IV of
the Employee Retirement Income
readily available to the filer, including
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). To enable
a demonstration by a filer for the
the PBGC to anticipate and, when
previous year that a filing is not
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 12
Cultural property, Customs duties and
inspection, Imports, Prohibited
merchandise.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:46 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
possible, minimize potential liabilities
that may arise from the termination of
significantly underfunded plans, ERISA
section 4010 requires the reporting of
actuarial and financial information by
controlled groups with pension plans
that have significant funding problems.
Specifically, reporting is required by a
controlled group if: (1) The aggregate
unfunded vested benefits of all plans
maintained by members of the
controlled group exceed $50 million
(disregarding plans with no unfunded
vested benefits); (2) the conditions
specified in section 302(f) of ERISA and
section 412(n) of the Internal Revenue
Code for imposing a lien for missed
contributions exceeding $1 million have
been met with respect to any plan
maintained by any member of the
controlled group; or (3) the Internal
Revenue Service has granted minimum
funding waivers in excess of $1 million
to any plan maintained by any member
of the controlled group, and any portion
of the waiver(s) is still outstanding.
Pursuant to section 4010 of ERISA,
the PBGC issued its regulation on
Annual Financial and Actuarial
Information Reporting in 1995 (29 CFR
part 4010). The regulation specifies the
items of identifying, financial, and
actuarial information that filers must
submit under section 4010 but does not
currently require a standardized format.
The PBGC reviews the information that
is filed and enters it into an electronic
database for more detailed analysis.
Computer-assisted analysis of this
information enables the PBGC to
anticipate possible major demands on
the pension insurance system and to
focus PBGC resources on situations that
pose the greatest risks to that system.
Because other sources of information are
usually not as current as the section
4010 information, the section 4010
filing plays a vital role in the PBGC’s
ability to protect participant and
premium-payer interests.
As modified, the final rule: (1)
Requires electronic filing of section
4010 information in a standardized
format; (2) requires the submission of
certain additional information the PBGC
needs to carry out its role of protecting
participant and premium-payer
interests; (3) modifies the rules for
determining whether aggregate
unfunded vested benefits exceed $50
million (the $50 million section 4010
gateway test) for reporting for
information years ending on or after
December 31, 2005; and (4) removes the
requirement that a power of attorney
accompany any filing made by a person
other than a filer.
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Comments
The PBGC received seven comment
letters: One from a nonprofit association
representing a number of large
employers, two from large corporations,
and four from firms engaged in
employee benefits consulting. Three
commenters commended the PBGC for
proposing to require the electronic
submission of standardized section 4010
reports. One of those commenters stated
that ‘‘the electronic submission of
standardized § 4010 reports is likely to
help plan sponsors to submit (and the
PBGC to collect) timely, complete,
accurate, and useable information in a
cost-effective manner.’’
Commenters expressed three major
concerns: (1) The new information
requirements, in particular the
requirement to provide identifying
information on exempt entities, would
be burdensome and unnecessary; (2) the
elimination of the optional assumptions
method for determining unfunded
vested benefits could be unfair to some
companies and would make it difficult
for them to file in time; and (3) it would
be difficult to adjust to the PBGC’s Webbased software application and the
additional filing requirements,
especially in time to comply with the
deadline for the first year under the new
rules (April 15, 2005, for calendar year
filers). There were a number of other
miscellaneous comments.
New Information Requirements
Identifying information on exempt
entities. Several commenters raised
concerns about the proposed
requirement to provide identifying
information on exempt entities (defined
in § 4010.4(d)). The commenters stated
that the new requirement would be
onerous and not helpful to the PBGC.
One commenter noted that its controlled
group includes a very large number of
entities (over 1,000) and that many of
these have little or no assets. It noted
that entities with a de minimis amount
of assets should not be of concern to the
PBGC. Two commenters suggested that
the PBGC should not change the current
exclusion for exempt entities. Those
commenters suggested that if a change
is required, the PBGC could adopt a
standard similar to the SEC standard for
allowing the omission of certain
companies from the list of subsidiaries
on Exhibit 21 of SEC Form 10–K. One
of these commenters suggested that the
final rule should exempt financially
sound companies from this requirement.
One commenter suggested that the
PBGC allow filers to provide this
information by an attachment. One
commenter questioned the PBGC’s
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:19 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
authority to require a filer upon written
request to submit additional information
about exempt entities and asked that the
regulation specify the additional
information about exempt entities the
PBGC could request.
In light of these comments, the PBGC
has decided to eliminate from the final
rule the proposed requirement to
provide identifying information on
exempt entities. While the PBGC has
determined that it is not necessary to
collect this information on an annual
basis for all section 4010 filers, such
information is nonetheless vital to
protecting the interests of the pension
insurance program in certain
circumstances, and the PBGC will
request filers to provide such
information on exempt entities when
circumstances dictate. As explained in
the preamble to the proposed rule (69
FR at 77681), exempt entities sometimes
present a valuable source of recovery for
PBGC claims (should any arise). This is
because all members of the controlled
group are jointly and severally liable to
the PBGC. Therefore, the PBGC may be
the only creditor, or one of just a few
creditors, of the exempt entity. Section
4010 of ERISA and the existing
regulation clearly allow the PBGC to ask
for identifying and financial information
from all section 4010 filers. Moreover,
the PBGC could require the additional
information annually from all filers. See
the preamble to the final regulation that
first implemented section 4010, 60 FR
66054, 66055 (Dec. 20, 1995). Therefore,
the PBGC stresses that in specific cases
it will exercise its authority under Title
IV to request this additional
information.
Expansion of financial information on
non-contributing sponsors. One
commenter said that extending the
requirement to report revenue, assets
and income to controlled group
members who are not contributing
sponsors seems to impose the
administrative burden of sponsoring a
defined benefit plan on entities who
choose not to sponsor such plans.
ERISA section 4010 specifically
includes each member of a contributing
sponsor’s controlled group among the
persons required to provide
information. This requirement applies
only to a controlled group member
whose financial information cannot be
ascertained by the PBGC because it is
combined with other members’
information in a consolidated financial
statement. Moreover, as explained in the
proposed rule (69 FR at 77681), the
PBGC needs this information
breakdown on all nonexempt entities
included in consolidated financial
statements, not only on contributing
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11541
sponsors. This information enables the
PBGC to identify which controlled
group members hold the assets of the
consolidated group. This information
breakdown is currently maintained by
controlled groups that file consolidated
statements, and thus providing it would
not be burdensome.
Changes in controlled group. One
commenter had concerns about the
requirement to report controlled group
changes because such changes are
already captured through reporting
under part 4043 (Reportable Events).
Part 4043 does not apply when a
member joins the controlled group. In
addition, the reporting requirements
under part 4043 provide a number of
waivers that are not appropriate for
section 4010 filers. This commenter also
argued that it would be burdensome to
report the potentially high volume of
non-substantive controlled group
changes. Because the PBGC is
eliminating the proposed requirement to
report on exempt entities, much of this
burden is relieved.
Frozen plans. A commenter stated
that the information on frozen plans
would provide little benefit to the PBGC
and could be obtained elsewhere. As
explained in the preamble to the
proposed rule, the PBGC needs this
information to better analyze unfunded
vested benefits liability. The
information is not always available in
the actuarial valuation report or the
Form 5500. That commenter also asked
that the PBGC clarify what it means by
plan freezes. The section 4010 filing
instructions on the PBGC’s Web site
specify the types of freezes that must be
reported.
Demonstration by previous filer of
exemption. One commenter questioned
the PBGC’s authority to require a filer
for the previous year to demonstrate that
a filing is not required for the current
year. The commenter suggested that if
the PBGC retains this requirement, it
should eliminate the requirement to
report the amount of unfunded vested
benefits. The PBGC has the general
authority under Title IV to promulgate
regulations to carry out the purposes of
the title, and, as explained in the
proposed rule, the requirement clearly
furthers the purpose of ERISA by
ensuring that filers do not overlook their
filing obligations. In response to this
comment, the PBGC has modified the
section 4010 filing instructions on its
Web site by removing the requirement
that previous filers report the amount of
unfunded vested benefits in all cases.
However, the instructions make clear
that the PBGC will, on a case-by-case
basis, require a more complete
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
11542
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
demonstration that filing is not
required.
Optional Assumptions
Several commenters asked the PBGC
to reconsider the proposed change to the
regulation that would prohibit filers
from using optional assumptions for
determining unfunded vested benefits
for purposes of the $50 million section
4010 gateway test. Commenters noted
that some companies might be relying
on the optional assumptions to
determine that a 2004 filing is not
required and eliminating this option
would create the need to perform
additional calculations to determine if a
section 4010 filing is required, and if so,
leave the filer little time to assemble the
filing. Based on this, several
commenters asked for a one-year delay
in the effective date of the final
regulation. In addition, one commenter
stated that the optional assumptions
method was an appropriate method and
should not be eliminated.
As explained in detail in the preamble
to the proposed rule (69 FR at 77681),
reporting under section 4010 is
warranted if the $50 million section
4010 gateway test is reached using the
rules under § 4006.4 for determining
unfunded vested benefits. However, in
order to give companies additional time
to adjust to this change, the final rule
will allow the use of the optional
assumptions for one more year (i.e., for
filings with respect to information years
ending before December 31, 2005).
Web-Based Filing
A number of commenters said that it
would be difficult to adjust to the
PBGC’s web-based software application
and the additional filing requirements,
and especially difficult to adjust in time
to comply with the deadline for the first
year (April 15, 2005, for calendar year
filers). Several commenters said that the
PBGC should not require submission
through the PBGC’s Web-based software
application but should provide an
alternative of submitting the
information on an electronic
spreadsheet or other commonly used
electronic format. Several commenters
urged that the Web-based software
application should allow for more than
one ID/password per filing, so that
certain information could be entered
under one password, while other
information could be entered under
another password. Two commenters
suggested that the Web-based software
be designed to allow the company to
enter the financial information, without
providing access to that information to
the actuary, and allow the actuary to
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:19 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
enter the actuarial information
separately.
There are a number of reasons why
the proposed rule required filing
through the PBGC’s Web-based software
application. As stated in the preamble to
the proposed rule (69 FR at 77680),
filers currently provide section 4010
information in a non-standard format.
This makes the information harder to
use, restricts the PBGC’s ability to
perform electronic data analysis, and in
general results in unnecessary work,
inaccuracies, and delays. The PBGC has
concluded that its ability to protect
participant and premium-payer interests
would increase and that the filing
process would work more efficiently if
filers provided information
electronically and in a standardized
format. Moreover, filing by using the
PBGC’s Web-based software application
will have many advantages over filing
by using a commonly-used electronic
format. For example, the Web-based
software will automatically create a
database of section 4010 information
and will perform validity checks to
ensure the filing is internally consistent
and complete before it is submitted. In
addition, the Web-based software will
retain the filer’s previous year’s filing
and use this as a starting point for
completing the current year’s filing; in
general, information will need to be
reentered each year only to the extent it
has changed from the prior year.
Nevertheless, in order to give filers
more time to adjust to the web-based
software application, for the first year
(i.e., for filings with respect to
information years ending before
December 31, 2005), filers may submit
their reports in one of two manners: (1)
Using the PBGC’s Web-based software
application, or (2) providing the
information in a commonly-used
electronic format as specified on the
PBGC’s Web site. For filings using a
commonly-used electronic format, the
section 4010 filing instructions on the
PBGC’s Web site specify the acceptable
electronic file types (e.g., compressed,
pdf, Word, Wordperfect, or Excel) and
the requirements for organizing and
presenting the information. After the
first year, filing will be permitted only
through the PBGC’s Web-based software
application.
Although the Web-based software
application does not provide for
multiple passwords, where filings
require the effort of multiple people, the
PBGC expects that one person will
collect the information from all sources
and then enter the information via the
Web-based software application. For the
first year, filers may avoid the problems
that might arise due to the single ID/
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
password feature of the Web-based
software application by choosing the
option of submitting their reports in an
electronic format as specified on the
PBGC’s Web site. The PBGC is looking
into the feasibility of providing multiple
passwords for reporting for future
information years.
One commenter noted that neither the
preamble nor the proposed rule
provides that the PBGC’s Web site
would be secure. In the materials
provided on the PBGC’s Web site along
with the proposed rule (https://
www.pbgc.gov/laws/lawsregs/
federalreg/proprule.htm), the PBGC
explained that the Web-based software
application would be secure. The PBGC
has ensured that the Web-based
software application uses the best
available information security measures.
Some commenters asked for
clarification on how certain aspects of
the Web-based software application will
work (for example, the procedure for
submitting an actuarial valuation report
after the section 4010 filing due date as
permitted under § 4010.8(b) or
correcting a filing after submission). The
PBGC has made these clarifications in
the section 4010 filing instructions on
the PBGC’s Web site.
Proposed Legislation
Several commenters suggested that
the PBGC should delay the effective
date of the proposed rule so that it can
be coordinated with any legislation
enacted by Congress affecting pension
funding and disclosure. The regulatory
changes made by this final rule are
needed under the current state of the
law and it would be contrary to the
interests of the pension insurance
program to delay implementation based
on the assumption that Congress will
legislate in this area. In the event that
Congressional action affects part 4010 of
the regulations, the PBGC will make
appropriate changes.
Miscellaneous Comments
One commenter asked for clarification
of the date by which contributions must
be made in order to be taken into
account for determining unfunded
vested benefits for purposes of the $50
million section 4010 gateway test. The
final rule clarifies that contributions
must be paid on or before the due date
for filing specified in § 4010.10(a) of this
part (without regard to the alternative
due date under § 4010.10(b) of this part).
In addition, the final rule clarifies that
contributions paid after the end of the
plan year must be attributable to that
plan year (i.e, the plan year for which
they are to be taken into account). Thus,
contributions made after the end of the
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
plan year and used to satisfy quarterly
contribution requirements for the
current plan year (the plan year in
which they are made) are not taken into
account. In addition, the final rule
clarifies that contributions must be
discounted back to the end of the plan
year and the methodology for doing so.
Commenters asked for guidance on a
number of reporting issues, including
participant counts, breakdown of benefit
liabilities by participant categories, and
expected retirement age. The section
4010 filing instructions on the PBGC’s
Web site clarify these issues.
Another commenter suggested that
rather than reporting the specific
actuarial assumptions used to determine
benefit liabilities, filers should be
permitted to simply indicate that the
required assumptions were used. The
section 4010 filing instructions on the
PBGC’s website allow this, except that
filers will be required to enter the
interest rate and expense load because
in many situations the incorrect interest
rate is used or the load is omitted.
One commenter had concerns with
allowing the PBGC, through instructions
on its Web site, to modify the format of
the information and to require the
submission of additional information
relating to the specific information
described in the regulation. The
commenter stated that it would impose
a larger burden on filers if the PBGC
does not formally announce and
communicate the changes publicly and
that filers would need advance
notification of these changes. As
explained in the preamble to the
proposed rule (69 FR at 77680), the rule
builds in the flexibility needed to allow
the PBGC to update the electronic filing
process as technology advances.
Moreover, the rule allows the PBGC to
use its Web site to specify additional
information only if that information
relates to information already required
by the regulation. The PBGC intends to
make any changes public by means of
advance posting to its Web site and by
other means as appropriate.
Another commenter suggested that
the PBGC should provide relief for filers
that are unable to file because of
problems with the PBGC’s Web-based
software application or other PBGC
systems (such as e-mail). The PBGC’s
general authority to provide waivers and
extensions under §§ 4000.5, 4000.32,
and 4010.11 and the rules under
§ 4000.30 (relating to the need to resend
an electronic submission for technical
reasons) would cover such a case.
One commenter asked the PBGC to
extend the comment period from 30
days to 90 days. The PBGC is not
extending the comment period. In the
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:19 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
preamble to the proposed rule, the
PBGC explained in detail why a 30-day
comment period was appropriate (69 FR
at 77681).
One commenter expressed concern
that the regulation provides no penalty
relief for the first year’s filings under the
new procedures. Much of the
commenter’s concern has been
addressed by the other modifications
the PBGC has made to the proposed
rule. Moreover, under its penalty policy,
the PBGC can grant penalty relief for
reasonable cause. The PBGC recognizes
that filers may have section 4010
compliance questions, especially for the
April 15, 2005, filing. The PBGC will
provide information on its Web site,
https://www.pbgc.gov, on how filers may
seek guidance on section 4010
compliance questions.
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
List of Subjects
29 CFR Part 4000
Pension insurance, Pensions,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
29 CFR Part 4010
Pensions, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
I For the reasons given above, the PBGC
amends 29 CFR parts 4000 and 4010 as
follows.
PART 4000—FILING, ISSUANCE,
COMPUTATION OF TIME, AND
RECORD RETENTION
1. The authority citation for part 4000
continues to read as follows:
I
Applicability
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1082(f), 1302(b)(3).
This rule applies to reporting for any
information year ending on or after
December 31, 2004, except that the
optional assumptions method (as
provided in § 4010.4(b)(2) of this part
before amendment by this final rule)
may be used for reporting for
information years ending before
December 31, 2005.
Compliance With Rulemaking and
Paperwork Reduction Act Guidelines
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that this final rule is a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and has
therefore reviewed the final rule under
Executive Order 12866.
The PBGC certifies under section
605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The tests for identifying filers under
section 4010(b) of ERISA effectively
limit the filing requirements to large
companies and their controlled groups.
Accordingly, as provided in section 605
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), sections 603 and 604
do not apply.
The PBGC is submitting the
information requirements contained in
this final rule to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and
approval under section 3507(d) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This
final rule modifies paperwork
collections under both part 4000
(approved under OMB control number
1212–0059; expires 10/31/06) and Part
4010 (approved under OMB control
number 1212–0049; expires 2/29/08).
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
11543
Sfmt 4700
I
2. Revise § 4000.3 to read as follows:
§ 4000.3
What methods of filing may I use?
(a) Paper filings. Except for the filings
listed in paragraph (b) of this section,
you may file any submission with us by
hand, mail, or commercial delivery
service.
(b) Electronic filings. You must submit
the information required under 29 CFR
part 4010 electronically in accordance
with the instructions on the PBGC’s
Web site, except as otherwise provided
by the PBGC.
(c) Information on electronic filings.
Current information on electronic
filings, including permitted methods,
fax numbers, and e-mail addresses, is—
(1) On our Web site, https://
www.pbgc.gov;
(2) In our various printed forms and
instructions packages; and
(3) Available by contacting our
Customer Service Center at 1200 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC, 20005–
4026; telephone 1–800–400–7242 (for
participants), or 1–800–736–2444 (for
practitioners). (TTY/TDD users may call
the Federal relay service toll-free at 1–
800–877–8339 and ask to be connected
to the appropriate number.)
I 3. Amend § 4000.4 by adding two
sentences to the end of the section to
read as follows:
§ 4000.4
Where do I file my submission?
* * * You do not have to address
electronic submissions made through
our Web site. We are responsible for
ensuring that such submissions go to the
proper place.
I 4. Amend § 4000.23 as follows:
I a. Add a sentence to the end of
paragraph (a); and
I b. Add a sentence to the end of
paragraph (b)(3).
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
11544
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
§ 4010.4
The additions read as follows:
§ 4000.23 When is my submission or
issuance treated as filed or issued?
(a) * * * A submission made through
our Web site is considered to have been
sent when you perform the last act
necessary to indicate that your
submission is filed and cannot be
further edited or withdrawn.
(b) * * *
(3) * * * A submission made through
our Web site is considered to have been
received when we receive an electronic
signal that you have performed the last
act necessary to indicate that your
submission is filed and cannot be
further edited or withdrawn.
I 5. Amend § 4000.29 by adding three
sentences to the end of paragraph (a)
introductory text to read as follows:
§ 4000.29
What if I use electronic delivery?
(a) * * * A submission made through
our Web site is considered to have been
transmitted when you perform the last
act necessary to indicate that your
submission is filed and cannot be
further edited or withdrawn. You do not
have to address electronic submissions
made through our Web site. We are
responsible for ensuring that such
submissions go to the proper place.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 4010—ANNUAL FINANCIAL AND
ACTUARIAL INFORMATION
REPORTING
6. The authority citation for part 4010
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1310.
I
7. Revise § 4010.3 to read as follows:
§ 4010.3
Filing requirement.
(a) In general. Except as provided in
§ 4010.8(c) (relating to exempt plans)
and except where waivers have been
granted under § 4010.11, each filer shall
submit to the PBGC annually, on or
before the due date specified in
§ 4010.10, all information specified in
§ 4010.6(a) with respect to all members
of a controlled group and all plans
maintained by members of a controlled
group. Under § 4000.3(b) of this chapter,
except as otherwise provided by the
PBGC, the information shall be
submitted electronically in accordance
with the instructions on the PBGC’s
Web site.
(b) Single controlled group
submission. Any filer or other person
may submit the information specified in
§ 4010.6(a) on behalf of one or more
members of a filer’s controlled group.
I 8. Revise paragraphs (a)(3), (b), and (c)
introductory text of § 4010.4 to read as
follows:
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:19 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
Filers.
(a) * * *
(3) Any plan maintained by a member
of a controlled group has been granted
one or more minimum funding waivers
under section 303 of ERISA or section
412(d) of the Code, totaling in excess of
$1 million and, as of the end of the plan
year ending within the information year,
any portion thereof is still outstanding
(determined in accordance with
paragraph (c) of this section).
(b) Unfunded vested benefits. (1)
General. For purposes of the $50 million
test in paragraph (a)(1) of this section,
the value of a plan’s unfunded vested
benefits is determined at the end of the
plan year ending within the filer’s
information year in accordance with
section 4006(a)(3)(E)(iii) of ERISA and
§ 4006.4 of this chapter (without
reference to the exemptions and special
rules under § 4006.5 of this chapter).
(2) Contributions. For purposes of
determining the value of a plan’s
unfunded vested benefits under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section,
contributions made after the end of the
plan year ending within the filer’s
information year are taken into account
for that plan year only to the extent that
they are—
(i) Paid on or before the filing due
date under § 4010.10(a) (without regard
to the alternative due date under
§ 4010.10(b));
(ii) Attributable to that plan year for
funding purposes under ERISA section
302(c)(1) and section 412(c)(10) of the
Code; and
(iii) Discounted in accordance with
§ 4006.4(b)(2)(iv) if unfunded vested
benefits are determined under
§ 4006.4(b) or in accordance with
§ 4006.4(c)(4) if unfunded vested
benefits are determined under
§ 4006.4(c).
(c) Outstanding waiver. Before the end
of the statutory amortization period, a
portion of a minimum funding waiver
for a plan is considered outstanding
unless—
*
*
*
*
*
I 9. Revise paragraph (c)(2) of § 4010.5 to
read as follows:
§ 4010.5
Information year.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Example. Filers A and B are
members of the same controlled group.
Filer A has a July 1 fiscal year, and filer
B has an October 1 fiscal year. The
information year is the calendar year.
Filer A’s financial information with
respect to its fiscal year ending June 30,
2004, and filer B’s financial information
with respect to its fiscal year ending
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
September 30, 2004, must be submitted
to the PBGC following the end of the
2004 calendar year (the calendar year in
which those fiscal years end). If filer B
were an exempt entity, the information
year would be filer A’s July 1 fiscal year.
I 10. Revise paragraphs (a) and (b) of
§ 4010.6 to read as follows:
§ 4010.6
Information to be filed.
(a) General. (1) Current filers. A filer
must submit the information specified
in § 4010.7 (identifying information),
§ 4010.8 (plan actuarial information)
and § 4010.9 (financial information)
with respect to each member of the
filer’s controlled group and each plan
maintained by any member of the
controlled group, and any other
information relating to the information
specified in §§ 4010.7 through 4010.9,
as specified in the instructions on the
PBGC’s website.
(2) Previous filers. If a filer for the
immediately preceding information year
is not required to file for the current
information year, the filer must submit
information, in accordance with the
instructions on the PBGC’s website,
demonstrating why a filing is not
required for the current information
year.
(b) Additional information. By written
notification, the PBGC may require any
filer to submit additional actuarial or
financial information that is necessary
to determine plan assets and liabilities
for any period through the end of the
filer’s information year, or the financial
status of a filer for any period through
the end of the filer’s information year
(including information on exempt
entities and exempt plans). The
information must be submitted within
ten days after the date of the written
notification or by a different time
specified therein.
*
*
*
*
*
I 11. Revise § 4010.7 to read as follows:
§ 4010.7
Identifying information.
(a) Filers. Each filer is required to
provide, in accordance with the
instructions on the PBGC’s website, the
following identifying information with
respect to each member of the
controlled group (excluding exempt
entities)—
(1) Current members. For an entity
that is a member of the controlled group
as of the end of the filer’s information
year—
(i) The name, address, and telephone
number of the entity and the legal
relationships with other members of the
controlled group (for example, parent,
subsidiary);
(ii) The nine-digit Employer
Identification Number (EIN) assigned by
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
the IRS to the entity (or if there is no
EIN for the entity, an explanation);
(iii) If the entity became a member of
the controlled group during the
information year, the date the entity
became a member of the controlled
group; and
(2) Former members. For any entity
that ceased to be a member of the
controlled group during the filer’s
information year, the date the entity
ceased to be a member of the controlled
group and the identifying information
required by paragraph (a)(1) of this
section as of the date immediately
preceding the date the entity left the
controlled group.
(b) Plans. Each filer is required to
provide, in accordance with the
instructions on the PBGC’s website, the
following identifying information with
respect to each plan (including exempt
plans) maintained by any member of the
controlled group (including exempt
entities)—
(1) Current plans. For a plan that is
maintained by the controlled group as of
the last day of the filer’s information
year—
(i) The name of the plan;
(ii) The EIN and the three-digit Plan
Number (PN) assigned by the
contributing sponsor to the plan (or if
there is no EIN or PN for the plan, an
explanation);
(iii) If the EIN or PN of the plan has
changed since the beginning of the
filer’s information year, the previous
EIN or PN and an explanation;
(iv) If the plan had not been
maintained by the controlled group
immediately before the filer’s
information year, the date the plan was
first maintained by the controlled group
during the information year; and
(v) If, as of any day during the
information year, the plan was frozen
(for eligibility or benefit accrual
purposes), a description of the date and
the nature of the freeze (e.g., service is
frozen but pay is not).
(2) Former plans. For a plan that
ceased to be maintained by the
controlled group during the filer’s
information year, the date the plan
ceased to be so maintained,
identification of the controlled group
currently maintaining the plan, and the
identifying information required by
paragraph (b)(1) as of the date
immediately preceding that date.
I 12. Amend § 4010.8 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b) as follows:
§ 4010.8
Plan actuarial information.
(a) Required information. For each
plan (other than an exempt plan)
maintained by any member of the filer’s
controlled group, each filer is required
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:19 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
to provide, in accordance with the
instructions on the PBGC’s website, the
following actuarial information—
(1) The number of—
(i) Retired participants and
beneficiaries receiving payments;
(ii) Terminated vested participants,
and
(iii) Active participants;
(2) The fair market value of the plan’s
assets;
(3) The value of the plan’s benefit
liabilities, setting forth separately the
value of the liabilities attributable to
retired participants and beneficiaries
receiving payments, terminated vested
participants, and active participants,
determined (in accordance with
paragraph (d) of this section) at the end
of the plan year ending within the filer’s
information year;
(4) A description of the actuarial
assumptions for interest (i.e., the
specific interest rate(s), such as 5%),
mortality, retirement age, and loading
for administrative expenses, as used to
determine the benefit liabilities in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section; and
(5) A copy of the actuarial valuation
report for the plan year ending within
the filer’s information year that contains
or is supplemented by the following
information—
(i) Each amortization base and related
amortization charge or credit to the
funding standard account (as defined in
section 302(b) of ERISA or section
412(b) of the Code) for that plan year
(excluding the amount considered
contributed to the plan as described in
section 302(b)(3)(A) of ERISA or section
412(b)(3)(A) of the Code),
(ii) The itemized development of the
additional funding charge payable for
that plan year pursuant to section 412(l)
of the Code,
(iii) The minimum funding
contribution and the maximum
deductible contribution for that plan
year,
(iv) The actuarial assumptions and
methods used for that plan year for
purposes of section 302(b) and (d) of
ERISA or section 412(b) and (l) of the
Code (and any change in those
assumptions and methods since the
previous valuation and justifications for
any change),
(v) A summary of the principal
eligibility and benefit provisions on
which the valuation of the plan was
based (and any changes to those
provisions since the previous
valuation), along with descriptions of
any benefits not included in the
valuation, any significant events that
occurred during that plan year, and the
plan’s early retirement factors,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11545
(vi) The current liability, vested and
nonvested, calculated pursuant to
section 412 of the Code, setting forth
separately the value of the liabilities
attributable to retired participants and
beneficiaries receiving payments,
terminated vested participants, and
active participants,
(vii) The expected increase in current
liability due to benefits accruing during
the plan year, and
(viii) The expected plan
disbursements for the plan year; and
(6) A written certification by an
enrolled actuary that, to the best of his
or her knowledge and belief, the
actuarial information submitted is true,
correct, and complete and conforms to
all applicable laws and regulations,
provided that this certification may be
qualified in writing, but only to the
extent the qualification(s) are permitted
under 26 CFR 301.6059–1(d).
(b) Alternative compliance for plan
actuarial information. If any of the
information specified in paragraph (a)(5)
of this section is not available by the
date specified in § 4010.10(a), a filer
may satisfy the requirement to provide
such information by—
(1) Including a statement, with the
material that is submitted to the PBGC,
that the filer will file the unavailable
information by the alternative due date
specified in § 4010.10(b), and
(2) Filing such information (along
with a certification by an enrolled
actuary under paragraph (a)(6) of this
section) with the PBGC by that
alternative due date.
*
*
*
*
*
13. Revise paragraphs (a) introductory
text and (b)(2) of § 4010.9 to read as
follows:
I
§ 4010.9
Financial information.
(a) General. Except as provided in this
section, each filer is required to provide,
in accordance with the instructions on
the PBGC’s Web site, the following
financial information for each
controlled group member (other than an
exempt entity)—
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) For each controlled group member
included in the consolidated financial
statements (other than an exempt
entity), the member’s revenues and
operating income for the information
year, and net assets at the end of the
information year.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
11546
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Washington, DC, this 4th day of
March, 2005.
Elaine L. Chao,
Chairman, Board of Directors, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation.
Issued on the date set forth above pursuant
to a resolution of the Board of Directors
authorizing its Chairman to issue this final
rule.
Philip R. Hertz,
Secretary, Board of Directors, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 05–4623 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am]
Coast Guard
Background and Purpose
Bar, the Group Commander would be
better equipped to make timely
judgments on bar conditions and to
enforce this regulated navigation area.
Therefore, the authority to enforce this
regulated navigation is being delegated
to the Commanding Officer of Group
Humboldt Bay.
In this particular rulemaking, the
Coast Guard is designating an area
around the Humboldt Bay Bar as a RNA
for the following purposes: (1) To
establish the Coast Guard’s authority to
prohibit vessels carrying oil or
hazardous material as cargo from
crossing the bar during unsafe
conditions, (2) to establish waiver,
notice, and vessel escort policies, and
(3) to delegate the authority for
enforcing these regulations to the
Humboldt Bay Group Commander.
33 CFR Part 165
Because Humboldt Bay has a breaking
bar, a narrow entrance channel, and no
general anchorages within the bay,
transits of this area present significant
hazards to vessels carrying oil or
hazardous material as cargo. The
potential hazards to the subject vessels
and the consequences of casualties
involving commercial vessels carrying
oil or hazardous material as cargo
warrant special procedures to reduce
the potential for a collision or grounding
and the subsequent release of a cargo
covered by this regulation.
Prior to the issuance of this TFR, the
COTP issued several advisories
addressing safe entry procedures for
vessels transporting cargoes of oil or
other hazardous material in the
Humboldt Bay area. The most recent
was a COTP Advisory put into effect in
June of 1998 (COTP Advisory 01–98).
This advisory included policies for
when the bar would be closed to
specified vessel traffic, notice
requirements, vessel escort policies, and
addressed parameters and procedures
for waiver requests. In August of 2004,
representatives from the Coast Guard
Marine Safety Office San Francisco Bay
met with Humboldt Bay stakeholders to
review COTP Advisory 01–98. In
attendance at this meeting were
representatives from the California State
Department of Fish and Game’s Office of
Oil Spill Prevention and Response,
Humboldt Bay Coast Guard units, and
local oil tank vessel operators. The
COTP determined that although the
policies contained within the COTP
Advisory were appropriate, the policies
and procedures should be codified into
Federal Regulation to clearly establish
the Coast Guard’s authority to enforce
them. In addition, it was decided that
because Coast Guard Group Humboldt
Bay is located near the Humboldt Bay
Discussion of Rule
This rule designates the Humboldt
Bay Bar Channel and the Humboldt Bay
Entrance Channel as an RNA for the
purpose of regulating vessels
transporting cargoes of oil or hazardous
material. The potential hazards
associated with these products are
serious enough to justify special
procedures to reduce the possibility of
a collision or grounding during periods
of poor weather, which could lead to a
release of the materials covered by this
regulation. The regulation helps ensure
the safety of mariners, the public, the
port, and the environment by
establishing requirements and
procedures regarding: (1) Notice of
intent to cross the bar, (2) when the bar
would be closed to certain vessels due
to weather conditions, (3) waivers, and
(4) vessel escorts.
If the owner, master, agent, or person
in charge of a vessel to which the
regulation applies wants to obtain a
waiver to cross the bar when it is closed,
a waiver can be requested within 4
hours of crossing the bar and will be
considered for approval by the Group
Commander, or his designated
representative, on a case-by-case basis.
As a general rule waivers will only be
granted when the following conditions
exist: (1) Proper permission to cross has
been received, (2) sea conditions at the
bar are less than 6 feet, (3) winds at the
bar are less than 30 knots, (4) the transit
will take place during daylight hours,
(5) the vessel has only a single tow or
no tow, and (6) the visibility at the bar
is greater than 1,000 yards.
Deviations from the procedures and
requirements of this rule are prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Group Commander or his designated
representative. Vessels or persons
violating this section may be subject to
BILLING CODE 7708–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[CCGD11–04–010]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Humboldt
Bay Bar Channel and Humboldt Bay
Entrance Channel, Humboldt Bay, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
designating the Humboldt Bay Bar
Channel and the Humboldt Bay
Entrance Channel as a Regulated
Navigation Area (RNA) for certain
commercial vessels transporting oil or
hazardous material as cargo. This action
is necessary to reduce significant
hazards to subject vessels, the port and
the public that are present during
periods of poor weather conditions. The
RNA codifies existing Captain of the
Port San Francisco Bay (COTP) policies
for vessels transporting oil or certain
dangerous cargoes in bulk within
Humboldt Bay.
DATES: This rule is effective from April
8, 2005 to October 11, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of the docket [CCGD11–
04–010] and are available for inspection
or copying at Coast Guard Marine Safety
Office San Francisco Bay, Coast Guard
Island, Alameda, California, 94501,
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Doug Ebbers, Waterways
Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard
Marine Safety Office San Francisco Bay,
at (510) 437–2770.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:19 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B),
the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for not publishing an NPRM. Any
delay in implementing this rule would
be contrary to the public interest since
immediate action is necessary to protect
the maritime public and the
environment from the hazards
associated with these cargoes and the
extremely dangerous marine conditions
at the Humboldt Bay Bar. A separate
NPRM to make permanent the
regulations in this TFR will be
published to allow public comment
prior to the issuance of a final rule to
make these regulations permanent.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 9, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11540-11546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4623]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4000 and 4010
RIN 1212-AB01
Electronic Filing--Annual Financial and Actuarial Information
AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The PBGC is amending its regulation on Annual Financial and
Actuarial Information Reporting to require: Electronic filing in a
standardized format of certain identifying, financial, and actuarial
information and the filing of additional items of supporting
information that are readily available to the filer, including a
demonstration by a filer for the previous year that a filing is not
required for the current year. The final rule will strengthen the
defined benefit system and enhance the PBGC's ability to carry out its
mission effectively and efficiently.
DATES: Effective Date: April 8, 2005. For a discussion of applicability
of the amendments, see the Applicability section in SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James J. Armbruster, Acting Director,
Legislative & Regulatory Department, or James L. Beller, Attorney,
Legislative & Regulatory Department, PBGC, 1200 K Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20005-4026; (202) 326-4024. (TTY/TDD users may call the
Federal relay service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to be
connected to (202) 326-4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 28, 2004 (at 69 FR 77679), the
PBGC published a proposed rule modifying 29 CFR part 4010 of the PBGC's
regulations (Annual Financial and Actuarial Information Reporting).
(The PBGC published a correction on January 12, 2005 (at 70 FR 2080)).
The PBGC received seven comment letters on the proposed rule (which are
addressed below) and is issuing the final regulation with three
modifications: (1) The proposed requirement to provide identifying
information on exempt entities is eliminated; (2) for the first year
this rule is in effect, filers may submit their reports by providing
the information in an electronic format specified on the PBGC's Web
site, rather than exclusively through the PBGC's Web-based software
application, and (3) for that first year, companies may continue to use
the optional assumptions method to determine whether filing is
required. There are other minor modifications, as noted below.
This rule is part of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's
(PBGC's) ongoing effort to streamline regulation and to improve
administration of the pension insurance program, with a focus on making
pension-related data more accurate, complete, timely, and--in
particular--transparent. It is also part of the PBGC's ongoing
implementation of the Government Paperwork Elimination Act and is
consistent with the Office of Management and Budget's directive to
remove regulatory impediments to electronic transactions. The rule
builds in the flexibility needed to allow the PBGC to update the
electronic filing process as technology advances.
The PBGC administers the pension insurance programs under Title IV
of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). To
enable the PBGC to anticipate and, when possible, minimize potential
liabilities that may arise from the termination of significantly
underfunded plans, ERISA section 4010 requires the reporting of
actuarial and financial information by controlled groups with pension
plans that have significant funding problems. Specifically, reporting
is required by a controlled group if: (1) The aggregate unfunded vested
benefits of all plans maintained by members of the controlled group
exceed $50 million (disregarding plans with no unfunded vested
benefits); (2) the conditions specified in section 302(f) of ERISA and
section 412(n) of the Internal Revenue Code for imposing a lien for
missed contributions exceeding $1 million have been met with respect to
any plan maintained by any member of the controlled group; or (3) the
Internal Revenue Service has granted minimum funding waivers in excess
of $1 million to any plan maintained by any member of the controlled
group, and any portion of the waiver(s) is still outstanding.
Pursuant to section 4010 of ERISA, the PBGC issued its regulation
on Annual Financial and Actuarial Information Reporting in 1995 (29 CFR
part 4010). The regulation specifies the items of identifying,
financial, and actuarial information that filers must submit under
section 4010 but does not currently require a standardized format. The
PBGC reviews the information that is filed and enters it into an
electronic database for more detailed analysis. Computer-assisted
analysis of this information enables the PBGC to anticipate possible
major demands on the pension insurance system and to focus PBGC
resources on situations that pose the greatest risks to that system.
Because other sources of information are usually not as current as the
section 4010 information, the section 4010 filing plays a vital role in
the PBGC's ability to protect participant and premium-payer interests.
As modified, the final rule: (1) Requires electronic filing of
section 4010 information in a standardized format; (2) requires the
submission of certain additional information the PBGC needs to carry
out its role of protecting participant and premium-payer interests; (3)
modifies the rules for determining whether aggregate unfunded vested
benefits exceed $50 million (the $50 million section 4010 gateway test)
for reporting for information years ending on or after December 31,
2005; and (4) removes the requirement that a power of attorney
accompany any filing made by a person other than a filer.
[[Page 11541]]
Comments
The PBGC received seven comment letters: One from a nonprofit
association representing a number of large employers, two from large
corporations, and four from firms engaged in employee benefits
consulting. Three commenters commended the PBGC for proposing to
require the electronic submission of standardized section 4010 reports.
One of those commenters stated that ``the electronic submission of
standardized Sec. 4010 reports is likely to help plan sponsors to
submit (and the PBGC to collect) timely, complete, accurate, and
useable information in a cost-effective manner.''
Commenters expressed three major concerns: (1) The new information
requirements, in particular the requirement to provide identifying
information on exempt entities, would be burdensome and unnecessary;
(2) the elimination of the optional assumptions method for determining
unfunded vested benefits could be unfair to some companies and would
make it difficult for them to file in time; and (3) it would be
difficult to adjust to the PBGC's Web-based software application and
the additional filing requirements, especially in time to comply with
the deadline for the first year under the new rules (April 15, 2005,
for calendar year filers). There were a number of other miscellaneous
comments.
New Information Requirements
Identifying information on exempt entities. Several commenters
raised concerns about the proposed requirement to provide identifying
information on exempt entities (defined in Sec. 4010.4(d)). The
commenters stated that the new requirement would be onerous and not
helpful to the PBGC. One commenter noted that its controlled group
includes a very large number of entities (over 1,000) and that many of
these have little or no assets. It noted that entities with a de
minimis amount of assets should not be of concern to the PBGC. Two
commenters suggested that the PBGC should not change the current
exclusion for exempt entities. Those commenters suggested that if a
change is required, the PBGC could adopt a standard similar to the SEC
standard for allowing the omission of certain companies from the list
of subsidiaries on Exhibit 21 of SEC Form 10-K. One of these commenters
suggested that the final rule should exempt financially sound companies
from this requirement. One commenter suggested that the PBGC allow
filers to provide this information by an attachment. One commenter
questioned the PBGC's authority to require a filer upon written request
to submit additional information about exempt entities and asked that
the regulation specify the additional information about exempt entities
the PBGC could request.
In light of these comments, the PBGC has decided to eliminate from
the final rule the proposed requirement to provide identifying
information on exempt entities. While the PBGC has determined that it
is not necessary to collect this information on an annual basis for all
section 4010 filers, such information is nonetheless vital to
protecting the interests of the pension insurance program in certain
circumstances, and the PBGC will request filers to provide such
information on exempt entities when circumstances dictate. As explained
in the preamble to the proposed rule (69 FR at 77681), exempt entities
sometimes present a valuable source of recovery for PBGC claims (should
any arise). This is because all members of the controlled group are
jointly and severally liable to the PBGC. Therefore, the PBGC may be
the only creditor, or one of just a few creditors, of the exempt
entity. Section 4010 of ERISA and the existing regulation clearly allow
the PBGC to ask for identifying and financial information from all
section 4010 filers. Moreover, the PBGC could require the additional
information annually from all filers. See the preamble to the final
regulation that first implemented section 4010, 60 FR 66054, 66055
(Dec. 20, 1995). Therefore, the PBGC stresses that in specific cases it
will exercise its authority under Title IV to request this additional
information.
Expansion of financial information on non-contributing sponsors.
One commenter said that extending the requirement to report revenue,
assets and income to controlled group members who are not contributing
sponsors seems to impose the administrative burden of sponsoring a
defined benefit plan on entities who choose not to sponsor such plans.
ERISA section 4010 specifically includes each member of a contributing
sponsor's controlled group among the persons required to provide
information. This requirement applies only to a controlled group member
whose financial information cannot be ascertained by the PBGC because
it is combined with other members' information in a consolidated
financial statement. Moreover, as explained in the proposed rule (69 FR
at 77681), the PBGC needs this information breakdown on all nonexempt
entities included in consolidated financial statements, not only on
contributing sponsors. This information enables the PBGC to identify
which controlled group members hold the assets of the consolidated
group. This information breakdown is currently maintained by controlled
groups that file consolidated statements, and thus providing it would
not be burdensome.
Changes in controlled group. One commenter had concerns about the
requirement to report controlled group changes because such changes are
already captured through reporting under part 4043 (Reportable Events).
Part 4043 does not apply when a member joins the controlled group. In
addition, the reporting requirements under part 4043 provide a number
of waivers that are not appropriate for section 4010 filers. This
commenter also argued that it would be burdensome to report the
potentially high volume of non-substantive controlled group changes.
Because the PBGC is eliminating the proposed requirement to report on
exempt entities, much of this burden is relieved.
Frozen plans. A commenter stated that the information on frozen
plans would provide little benefit to the PBGC and could be obtained
elsewhere. As explained in the preamble to the proposed rule, the PBGC
needs this information to better analyze unfunded vested benefits
liability. The information is not always available in the actuarial
valuation report or the Form 5500. That commenter also asked that the
PBGC clarify what it means by plan freezes. The section 4010 filing
instructions on the PBGC's Web site specify the types of freezes that
must be reported.
Demonstration by previous filer of exemption. One commenter
questioned the PBGC's authority to require a filer for the previous
year to demonstrate that a filing is not required for the current year.
The commenter suggested that if the PBGC retains this requirement, it
should eliminate the requirement to report the amount of unfunded
vested benefits. The PBGC has the general authority under Title IV to
promulgate regulations to carry out the purposes of the title, and, as
explained in the proposed rule, the requirement clearly furthers the
purpose of ERISA by ensuring that filers do not overlook their filing
obligations. In response to this comment, the PBGC has modified the
section 4010 filing instructions on its Web site by removing the
requirement that previous filers report the amount of unfunded vested
benefits in all cases. However, the instructions make clear that the
PBGC will, on a case-by-case basis, require a more complete
[[Page 11542]]
demonstration that filing is not required.
Optional Assumptions
Several commenters asked the PBGC to reconsider the proposed change
to the regulation that would prohibit filers from using optional
assumptions for determining unfunded vested benefits for purposes of
the $50 million section 4010 gateway test. Commenters noted that some
companies might be relying on the optional assumptions to determine
that a 2004 filing is not required and eliminating this option would
create the need to perform additional calculations to determine if a
section 4010 filing is required, and if so, leave the filer little time
to assemble the filing. Based on this, several commenters asked for a
one-year delay in the effective date of the final regulation. In
addition, one commenter stated that the optional assumptions method was
an appropriate method and should not be eliminated.
As explained in detail in the preamble to the proposed rule (69 FR
at 77681), reporting under section 4010 is warranted if the $50 million
section 4010 gateway test is reached using the rules under Sec. 4006.4
for determining unfunded vested benefits. However, in order to give
companies additional time to adjust to this change, the final rule will
allow the use of the optional assumptions for one more year (i.e., for
filings with respect to information years ending before December 31,
2005).
Web-Based Filing
A number of commenters said that it would be difficult to adjust to
the PBGC's web-based software application and the additional filing
requirements, and especially difficult to adjust in time to comply with
the deadline for the first year (April 15, 2005, for calendar year
filers). Several commenters said that the PBGC should not require
submission through the PBGC's Web-based software application but should
provide an alternative of submitting the information on an electronic
spreadsheet or other commonly used electronic format. Several
commenters urged that the Web-based software application should allow
for more than one ID/password per filing, so that certain information
could be entered under one password, while other information could be
entered under another password. Two commenters suggested that the Web-
based software be designed to allow the company to enter the financial
information, without providing access to that information to the
actuary, and allow the actuary to enter the actuarial information
separately.
There are a number of reasons why the proposed rule required filing
through the PBGC's Web-based software application. As stated in the
preamble to the proposed rule (69 FR at 77680), filers currently
provide section 4010 information in a non-standard format. This makes
the information harder to use, restricts the PBGC's ability to perform
electronic data analysis, and in general results in unnecessary work,
inaccuracies, and delays. The PBGC has concluded that its ability to
protect participant and premium-payer interests would increase and that
the filing process would work more efficiently if filers provided
information electronically and in a standardized format. Moreover,
filing by using the PBGC's Web-based software application will have
many advantages over filing by using a commonly-used electronic format.
For example, the Web-based software will automatically create a
database of section 4010 information and will perform validity checks
to ensure the filing is internally consistent and complete before it is
submitted. In addition, the Web-based software will retain the filer's
previous year's filing and use this as a starting point for completing
the current year's filing; in general, information will need to be
reentered each year only to the extent it has changed from the prior
year.
Nevertheless, in order to give filers more time to adjust to the
web-based software application, for the first year (i.e., for filings
with respect to information years ending before December 31, 2005),
filers may submit their reports in one of two manners: (1) Using the
PBGC's Web-based software application, or (2) providing the information
in a commonly-used electronic format as specified on the PBGC's Web
site. For filings using a commonly-used electronic format, the section
4010 filing instructions on the PBGC's Web site specify the acceptable
electronic file types (e.g., compressed, pdf, Word, Wordperfect, or
Excel) and the requirements for organizing and presenting the
information. After the first year, filing will be permitted only
through the PBGC's Web-based software application.
Although the Web-based software application does not provide for
multiple passwords, where filings require the effort of multiple
people, the PBGC expects that one person will collect the information
from all sources and then enter the information via the Web-based
software application. For the first year, filers may avoid the problems
that might arise due to the single ID/password feature of the Web-based
software application by choosing the option of submitting their reports
in an electronic format as specified on the PBGC's Web site. The PBGC
is looking into the feasibility of providing multiple passwords for
reporting for future information years.
One commenter noted that neither the preamble nor the proposed rule
provides that the PBGC's Web site would be secure. In the materials
provided on the PBGC's Web site along with the proposed rule (https://
www.pbgc.gov/laws/lawsregs/federalreg/proprule.htm), the PBGC explained
that the Web-based software application would be secure. The PBGC has
ensured that the Web-based software application uses the best available
information security measures.
Some commenters asked for clarification on how certain aspects of
the Web-based software application will work (for example, the
procedure for submitting an actuarial valuation report after the
section 4010 filing due date as permitted under Sec. 4010.8(b) or
correcting a filing after submission). The PBGC has made these
clarifications in the section 4010 filing instructions on the PBGC's
Web site.
Proposed Legislation
Several commenters suggested that the PBGC should delay the
effective date of the proposed rule so that it can be coordinated with
any legislation enacted by Congress affecting pension funding and
disclosure. The regulatory changes made by this final rule are needed
under the current state of the law and it would be contrary to the
interests of the pension insurance program to delay implementation
based on the assumption that Congress will legislate in this area. In
the event that Congressional action affects part 4010 of the
regulations, the PBGC will make appropriate changes.
Miscellaneous Comments
One commenter asked for clarification of the date by which
contributions must be made in order to be taken into account for
determining unfunded vested benefits for purposes of the $50 million
section 4010 gateway test. The final rule clarifies that contributions
must be paid on or before the due date for filing specified in Sec.
4010.10(a) of this part (without regard to the alternative due date
under Sec. 4010.10(b) of this part). In addition, the final rule
clarifies that contributions paid after the end of the plan year must
be attributable to that plan year (i.e, the plan year for which they
are to be taken into account). Thus, contributions made after the end
of the
[[Page 11543]]
plan year and used to satisfy quarterly contribution requirements for
the current plan year (the plan year in which they are made) are not
taken into account. In addition, the final rule clarifies that
contributions must be discounted back to the end of the plan year and
the methodology for doing so.
Commenters asked for guidance on a number of reporting issues,
including participant counts, breakdown of benefit liabilities by
participant categories, and expected retirement age. The section 4010
filing instructions on the PBGC's Web site clarify these issues.
Another commenter suggested that rather than reporting the specific
actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit liabilities, filers
should be permitted to simply indicate that the required assumptions
were used. The section 4010 filing instructions on the PBGC's website
allow this, except that filers will be required to enter the interest
rate and expense load because in many situations the incorrect interest
rate is used or the load is omitted.
One commenter had concerns with allowing the PBGC, through
instructions on its Web site, to modify the format of the information
and to require the submission of additional information relating to the
specific information described in the regulation. The commenter stated
that it would impose a larger burden on filers if the PBGC does not
formally announce and communicate the changes publicly and that filers
would need advance notification of these changes. As explained in the
preamble to the proposed rule (69 FR at 77680), the rule builds in the
flexibility needed to allow the PBGC to update the electronic filing
process as technology advances. Moreover, the rule allows the PBGC to
use its Web site to specify additional information only if that
information relates to information already required by the regulation.
The PBGC intends to make any changes public by means of advance posting
to its Web site and by other means as appropriate.
Another commenter suggested that the PBGC should provide relief for
filers that are unable to file because of problems with the PBGC's Web-
based software application or other PBGC systems (such as e-mail). The
PBGC's general authority to provide waivers and extensions under
Sec. Sec. 4000.5, 4000.32, and 4010.11 and the rules under Sec.
4000.30 (relating to the need to resend an electronic submission for
technical reasons) would cover such a case.
One commenter asked the PBGC to extend the comment period from 30
days to 90 days. The PBGC is not extending the comment period. In the
preamble to the proposed rule, the PBGC explained in detail why a 30-
day comment period was appropriate (69 FR at 77681).
One commenter expressed concern that the regulation provides no
penalty relief for the first year's filings under the new procedures.
Much of the commenter's concern has been addressed by the other
modifications the PBGC has made to the proposed rule. Moreover, under
its penalty policy, the PBGC can grant penalty relief for reasonable
cause. The PBGC recognizes that filers may have section 4010 compliance
questions, especially for the April 15, 2005, filing. The PBGC will
provide information on its Web site, https://www.pbgc.gov, on how filers
may seek guidance on section 4010 compliance questions.
Applicability
This rule applies to reporting for any information year ending on
or after December 31, 2004, except that the optional assumptions method
(as provided in Sec. 4010.4(b)(2) of this part before amendment by
this final rule) may be used for reporting for information years ending
before December 31, 2005.
Compliance With Rulemaking and Paperwork Reduction Act Guidelines
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this final
rule is a ``significant regulatory action'' and has therefore reviewed
the final rule under Executive Order 12866.
The PBGC certifies under section 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act that this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The tests
for identifying filers under section 4010(b) of ERISA effectively limit
the filing requirements to large companies and their controlled groups.
Accordingly, as provided in section 605 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), sections 603 and 604 do not apply.
The PBGC is submitting the information requirements contained in
this final rule to the Office of Management and Budget for review and
approval under section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
This final rule modifies paperwork collections under both part 4000
(approved under OMB control number 1212-0059; expires 10/31/06) and
Part 4010 (approved under OMB control number 1212-0049; expires 2/29/
08). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects
29 CFR Part 4000
Pension insurance, Pensions, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
29 CFR Part 4010
Pensions, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons given above, the PBGC amends 29 CFR parts 4000 and 4010
as follows.
PART 4000--FILING, ISSUANCE, COMPUTATION OF TIME, AND RECORD
RETENTION
0
1. The authority citation for part 4000 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1082(f), 1302(b)(3).
0
2. Revise Sec. 4000.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 4000.3 What methods of filing may I use?
(a) Paper filings. Except for the filings listed in paragraph (b)
of this section, you may file any submission with us by hand, mail, or
commercial delivery service.
(b) Electronic filings. You must submit the information required
under 29 CFR part 4010 electronically in accordance with the
instructions on the PBGC's Web site, except as otherwise provided by
the PBGC.
(c) Information on electronic filings. Current information on
electronic filings, including permitted methods, fax numbers, and e-
mail addresses, is--
(1) On our Web site, https://www.pbgc.gov;
(2) In our various printed forms and instructions packages; and
(3) Available by contacting our Customer Service Center at 1200 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC, 20005-4026; telephone 1-800-400-7242 (for
participants), or 1-800-736-2444 (for practitioners). (TTY/TDD users
may call the Federal relay service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask
to be connected to the appropriate number.)
0
3. Amend Sec. 4000.4 by adding two sentences to the end of the section
to read as follows:
Sec. 4000.4 Where do I file my submission?
* * * You do not have to address electronic submissions made
through our Web site. We are responsible for ensuring that such
submissions go to the proper place.
0
4. Amend Sec. 4000.23 as follows:
0
a. Add a sentence to the end of paragraph (a); and
0
b. Add a sentence to the end of paragraph (b)(3).
[[Page 11544]]
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 4000.23 When is my submission or issuance treated as filed or
issued?
(a) * * * A submission made through our Web site is considered to
have been sent when you perform the last act necessary to indicate that
your submission is filed and cannot be further edited or withdrawn.
(b) * * *
(3) * * * A submission made through our Web site is considered to
have been received when we receive an electronic signal that you have
performed the last act necessary to indicate that your submission is
filed and cannot be further edited or withdrawn.
0
5. Amend Sec. 4000.29 by adding three sentences to the end of
paragraph (a) introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 4000.29 What if I use electronic delivery?
(a) * * * A submission made through our Web site is considered to
have been transmitted when you perform the last act necessary to
indicate that your submission is filed and cannot be further edited or
withdrawn. You do not have to address electronic submissions made
through our Web site. We are responsible for ensuring that such
submissions go to the proper place.
* * * * *
PART 4010--ANNUAL FINANCIAL AND ACTUARIAL INFORMATION REPORTING
0
6. The authority citation for part 4010 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1310.
0
7. Revise Sec. 4010.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 4010.3 Filing requirement.
(a) In general. Except as provided in Sec. 4010.8(c) (relating to
exempt plans) and except where waivers have been granted under Sec.
4010.11, each filer shall submit to the PBGC annually, on or before the
due date specified in Sec. 4010.10, all information specified in Sec.
4010.6(a) with respect to all members of a controlled group and all
plans maintained by members of a controlled group. Under Sec.
4000.3(b) of this chapter, except as otherwise provided by the PBGC,
the information shall be submitted electronically in accordance with
the instructions on the PBGC's Web site.
(b) Single controlled group submission. Any filer or other person
may submit the information specified in Sec. 4010.6(a) on behalf of
one or more members of a filer's controlled group.
0
8. Revise paragraphs (a)(3), (b), and (c) introductory text of Sec.
4010.4 to read as follows:
Sec. 4010.4 Filers.
(a) * * *
(3) Any plan maintained by a member of a controlled group has been
granted one or more minimum funding waivers under section 303 of ERISA
or section 412(d) of the Code, totaling in excess of $1 million and, as
of the end of the plan year ending within the information year, any
portion thereof is still outstanding (determined in accordance with
paragraph (c) of this section).
(b) Unfunded vested benefits. (1) General. For purposes of the $50
million test in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the value of a plan's
unfunded vested benefits is determined at the end of the plan year
ending within the filer's information year in accordance with section
4006(a)(3)(E)(iii) of ERISA and Sec. 4006.4 of this chapter (without
reference to the exemptions and special rules under Sec. 4006.5 of
this chapter).
(2) Contributions. For purposes of determining the value of a
plan's unfunded vested benefits under paragraph (b)(1) of this section,
contributions made after the end of the plan year ending within the
filer's information year are taken into account for that plan year only
to the extent that they are--
(i) Paid on or before the filing due date under Sec. 4010.10(a)
(without regard to the alternative due date under Sec. 4010.10(b));
(ii) Attributable to that plan year for funding purposes under
ERISA section 302(c)(1) and section 412(c)(10) of the Code; and
(iii) Discounted in accordance with Sec. 4006.4(b)(2)(iv) if
unfunded vested benefits are determined under Sec. 4006.4(b) or in
accordance with Sec. 4006.4(c)(4) if unfunded vested benefits are
determined under Sec. 4006.4(c).
(c) Outstanding waiver. Before the end of the statutory
amortization period, a portion of a minimum funding waiver for a plan
is considered outstanding unless--
* * * * *
0
9. Revise paragraph (c)(2) of Sec. 4010.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 4010.5 Information year.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Example. Filers A and B are members of the same controlled
group. Filer A has a July 1 fiscal year, and filer B has an October 1
fiscal year. The information year is the calendar year. Filer A's
financial information with respect to its fiscal year ending June 30,
2004, and filer B's financial information with respect to its fiscal
year ending September 30, 2004, must be submitted to the PBGC following
the end of the 2004 calendar year (the calendar year in which those
fiscal years end). If filer B were an exempt entity, the information
year would be filer A's July 1 fiscal year.
0
10. Revise paragraphs (a) and (b) of Sec. 4010.6 to read as follows:
Sec. 4010.6 Information to be filed.
(a) General. (1) Current filers. A filer must submit the
information specified in Sec. 4010.7 (identifying information), Sec.
4010.8 (plan actuarial information) and Sec. 4010.9 (financial
information) with respect to each member of the filer's controlled
group and each plan maintained by any member of the controlled group,
and any other information relating to the information specified in
Sec. Sec. 4010.7 through 4010.9, as specified in the instructions on
the PBGC's website.
(2) Previous filers. If a filer for the immediately preceding
information year is not required to file for the current information
year, the filer must submit information, in accordance with the
instructions on the PBGC's website, demonstrating why a filing is not
required for the current information year.
(b) Additional information. By written notification, the PBGC may
require any filer to submit additional actuarial or financial
information that is necessary to determine plan assets and liabilities
for any period through the end of the filer's information year, or the
financial status of a filer for any period through the end of the
filer's information year (including information on exempt entities and
exempt plans). The information must be submitted within ten days after
the date of the written notification or by a different time specified
therein.
* * * * *
0
11. Revise Sec. 4010.7 to read as follows:
Sec. 4010.7 Identifying information.
(a) Filers. Each filer is required to provide, in accordance with
the instructions on the PBGC's website, the following identifying
information with respect to each member of the controlled group
(excluding exempt entities)--
(1) Current members. For an entity that is a member of the
controlled group as of the end of the filer's information year--
(i) The name, address, and telephone number of the entity and the
legal relationships with other members of the controlled group (for
example, parent, subsidiary);
(ii) The nine-digit Employer Identification Number (EIN) assigned
by
[[Page 11545]]
the IRS to the entity (or if there is no EIN for the entity, an
explanation);
(iii) If the entity became a member of the controlled group during
the information year, the date the entity became a member of the
controlled group; and
(2) Former members. For any entity that ceased to be a member of
the controlled group during the filer's information year, the date the
entity ceased to be a member of the controlled group and the
identifying information required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section as
of the date immediately preceding the date the entity left the
controlled group.
(b) Plans. Each filer is required to provide, in accordance with
the instructions on the PBGC's website, the following identifying
information with respect to each plan (including exempt plans)
maintained by any member of the controlled group (including exempt
entities)--
(1) Current plans. For a plan that is maintained by the controlled
group as of the last day of the filer's information year--
(i) The name of the plan;
(ii) The EIN and the three-digit Plan Number (PN) assigned by the
contributing sponsor to the plan (or if there is no EIN or PN for the
plan, an explanation);
(iii) If the EIN or PN of the plan has changed since the beginning
of the filer's information year, the previous EIN or PN and an
explanation;
(iv) If the plan had not been maintained by the controlled group
immediately before the filer's information year, the date the plan was
first maintained by the controlled group during the information year;
and
(v) If, as of any day during the information year, the plan was
frozen (for eligibility or benefit accrual purposes), a description of
the date and the nature of the freeze (e.g., service is frozen but pay
is not).
(2) Former plans. For a plan that ceased to be maintained by the
controlled group during the filer's information year, the date the plan
ceased to be so maintained, identification of the controlled group
currently maintaining the plan, and the identifying information
required by paragraph (b)(1) as of the date immediately preceding that
date.
0
12. Amend Sec. 4010.8 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) as follows:
Sec. 4010.8 Plan actuarial information.
(a) Required information. For each plan (other than an exempt plan)
maintained by any member of the filer's controlled group, each filer is
required to provide, in accordance with the instructions on the PBGC's
website, the following actuarial information--
(1) The number of--
(i) Retired participants and beneficiaries receiving payments;
(ii) Terminated vested participants, and
(iii) Active participants;
(2) The fair market value of the plan's assets;
(3) The value of the plan's benefit liabilities, setting forth
separately the value of the liabilities attributable to retired
participants and beneficiaries receiving payments, terminated vested
participants, and active participants, determined (in accordance with
paragraph (d) of this section) at the end of the plan year ending
within the filer's information year;
(4) A description of the actuarial assumptions for interest (i.e.,
the specific interest rate(s), such as 5%), mortality, retirement age,
and loading for administrative expenses, as used to determine the
benefit liabilities in paragraph (a)(3) of this section; and
(5) A copy of the actuarial valuation report for the plan year
ending within the filer's information year that contains or is
supplemented by the following information--
(i) Each amortization base and related amortization charge or
credit to the funding standard account (as defined in section 302(b) of
ERISA or section 412(b) of the Code) for that plan year (excluding the
amount considered contributed to the plan as described in section
302(b)(3)(A) of ERISA or section 412(b)(3)(A) of the Code),
(ii) The itemized development of the additional funding charge
payable for that plan year pursuant to section 412(l) of the Code,
(iii) The minimum funding contribution and the maximum deductible
contribution for that plan year,
(iv) The actuarial assumptions and methods used for that plan year
for purposes of section 302(b) and (d) of ERISA or section 412(b) and
(l) of the Code (and any change in those assumptions and methods since
the previous valuation and justifications for any change),
(v) A summary of the principal eligibility and benefit provisions
on which the valuation of the plan was based (and any changes to those
provisions since the previous valuation), along with descriptions of
any benefits not included in the valuation, any significant events that
occurred during that plan year, and the plan's early retirement
factors,
(vi) The current liability, vested and nonvested, calculated
pursuant to section 412 of the Code, setting forth separately the value
of the liabilities attributable to retired participants and
beneficiaries receiving payments, terminated vested participants, and
active participants,
(vii) The expected increase in current liability due to benefits
accruing during the plan year, and
(viii) The expected plan disbursements for the plan year; and
(6) A written certification by an enrolled actuary that, to the
best of his or her knowledge and belief, the actuarial information
submitted is true, correct, and complete and conforms to all applicable
laws and regulations, provided that this certification may be qualified
in writing, but only to the extent the qualification(s) are permitted
under 26 CFR 301.6059-1(d).
(b) Alternative compliance for plan actuarial information. If any
of the information specified in paragraph (a)(5) of this section is not
available by the date specified in Sec. 4010.10(a), a filer may
satisfy the requirement to provide such information by--
(1) Including a statement, with the material that is submitted to
the PBGC, that the filer will file the unavailable information by the
alternative due date specified in Sec. 4010.10(b), and
(2) Filing such information (along with a certification by an
enrolled actuary under paragraph (a)(6) of this section) with the PBGC
by that alternative due date.
* * * * *
0
13. Revise paragraphs (a) introductory text and (b)(2) of Sec. 4010.9
to read as follows:
Sec. 4010.9 Financial information.
(a) General. Except as provided in this section, each filer is
required to provide, in accordance with the instructions on the PBGC's
Web site, the following financial information for each controlled group
member (other than an exempt entity)--
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) For each controlled group member included in the consolidated
financial statements (other than an exempt entity), the member's
revenues and operating income for the information year, and net assets
at the end of the information year.
* * * * *
[[Page 11546]]
Issued in Washington, DC, this 4th day of March, 2005.
Elaine L. Chao,
Chairman, Board of Directors, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
Issued on the date set forth above pursuant to a resolution of
the Board of Directors authorizing its Chairman to issue this final
rule.
Philip R. Hertz,
Secretary, Board of Directors, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 05-4623 Filed 3-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7708-01-P