Cytec Industries Inc.; Analysis To Aid Public Comment, 11672-11673 [05-4592]
Download as PDF
11672
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
oversee the RMC Tucson business prior
to its divestiture and to ensure that
Cemex complies with its obligations
under the Consent Agreement. Mr.
Roebuck has more than 25 years of
construction materials industry
experience at all levels of management.
Most recently, Mr. Roebuck served as
Vice President of Sales and Marketing
with Southdown, Inc.’s Concrete
Products Division. He is also a former
member of the Board and Executive
Committee of the National Concrete
Masonry Association; has authored over
20 industry-specific continuing
education programs; and has served as
a contributing author and editor for the
National Ready Mixed Concrete
Association’s Certified Concrete Sales
Professional program.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
Consent Agreement, and it is not
intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the Consent Agreement
or proposed Order or to modify the
terms of the Consent Agreement or
proposed Order in any way.
By direction of the Commission, Chairman
Majoras recused.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–4591 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 041 0203]
Cytec Industries Inc.; Analysis To Aid
Public Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed Consent Agreement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this
matter settles alleged violations of
Federal law prohibiting unfair or
deceptive acts or practices or unfair
methods of competition. The attached
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes both the allegations in the
draft complaint that accompanies the
consent agreement and the terms of the
consent order—embodied in the consent
agreement—that would settle these
allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
‘‘Cytec Industries Inc., File No. 041
0203,’’ to facilitate the organization of
comments. A comment filed in paper
form should include this reference both
in the text and on the envelope, and
should be mailed or delivered to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission/Office of the Secretary,
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:06 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
Room H–159, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.
Comments containing confidential
material must be filed in paper form, as
explained in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section. The FTC is
requesting that any comment filed in
paper form be sent by courier or
overnight service, if possible, because
U.S. postal mail in the Washington area
and at the Commission is subject to
delay due to heightened security
precautions. Comments filed in
electronic form (except comments
containing any confidential material)
should be sent to the following e-mail
box: consentagreement@ftc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Tovsky, FTC, Bureau of
Competition, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326–
2634.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and § 2.34 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is
hereby given that the above-captioned
consent agreement containing a consent
order to cease and desist, having been
filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, has been
placed on the public record for a period
of thirty (30) days. The following
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
describes the terms of the consent
agreement, and the allegations in the
complaint. An electronic copy of the
full text of the consent agreement
package can be obtained from the FTC
Home Page (for March 1, 2005), on the
World Wide Web, at https://www.ftc.gov/
os/2005/03/index.htm. A paper copy
can be obtained from the FTC Public
Reference Room, Room 130–H, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580, either in person
or by calling (202) 326–2222.
Public comments are invited, and may
be filed with the Commission in either
paper or electronic form. Written
comments must be submitted on or
before March 30, 2005. Comments
should refer to ‘‘Cytec Industries Inc.,
File No. 041 0203,’’ to facilitate the
organization of comments. A comment
filed in paper form should include this
reference both in the text and on the
envelope, and should be mailed or
delivered to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission/Office of the
Secretary, Room H–159, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580. If the comment
contains any material for which
confidential treatment is requested, it
must be filed in paper (rather than
electronic) form, and the first page of
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the document must be clearly labeled
‘‘Confidential.’’ 1 The FTC is requesting
that any comment filed in paper form be
sent by courier or overnight service, if
possible, because U.S. postal mail in the
Washington area and at the Commission
is subject to delay due to heightened
security precautions. Comments filed in
electronic form should be sent to the
following e-mail box:
consentagreement@ftc.gov.
The FTC Act and other laws the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. All timely and responsive
public comments, whether filed in
paper or electronic form, will be
considered by the Commission, and will
be available to the public on the FTC
Web site, to the extent practicable, at
https://www.ftc.gov. As a matter of
discretion, the FTC makes every effort to
remove home contact information for
individuals from the public comments it
receives before placing those comments
on the FTC Web site. More information,
including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC’s
privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/
ftc/privacy.htm.
Analysis To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has accepted, subject to
final approval, an Agreement
Containing Consent Orders (‘‘Consent
Agreement’’) from Cytec Industries Inc.
(‘‘Cytec’’). The Consent Agreement is
intended to resolve anticompetitive
effects stemming from Cytec’s proposed
acquisition of the Surface Specialties
Business of UCB S.A. (‘‘UCB’’). The
Consent Agreement includes a proposed
Decision and Order (‘‘Order’’) that
would require Cytec to divest UCB
assets relating to the research,
development, marketing, sale, and
production of amino resins (‘‘UCB
Amino Resins Business’’). The Consent
Agreement also includes an Order to
Hold Separate and Maintain Assets,
which requires Cytec to preserve the
UCB Amino Resins Business as a viable,
competitive, and ongoing operation
until the divestiture is achieved.
The Consent Agreement, if finally
accepted by the Commission, would
settle charges that Cytec’s proposed
acquisition of UCB’s Surface Specialties
1 Commission Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The
comment must be accompanied by an explicit
request for confidential treatment, including the
factual and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the comment to be
withheld from the public record. The request will
be granted or denied by the Commission’s General
Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the
public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c).
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
Business may have substantially
lessened competition in the markets for
amino resins for: (1) Industrial liquid
coatings; and (2) adhesion promotion in
rubber. The Commission has reason to
believe that Cytec’s proposed
acquisition of UCB’s Surface Specialties
Business would have violated Section 7
of the Clayton Act and Section 5 of the
Federal Trade Commission Act.
The proposed Order has been placed
on the public record for thirty (30) days
to receive comments by interested
persons. Comments received during this
period will become part of the public
record. After thirty (30) days, the
Commission will review the Consent
Agreement and comments received and
decide whether to withdraw its
agreement or make final the Consent
Agreement’s proposed Order and Order
to Hold Separate and Maintain Assets.
I. Amino Resins for Industrial Liquid
Coatings and Adhesion Promotion in
Rubber
According to the Commission’s
proposed complaint, the relevant
product markets in which to analyze the
effects of Cytec’s proposed acquisition
of UCB’s Surface Specialties Business
are the manufacture and sale of amino
resins for: (1) Industrial liquid coatings;
and (2) adhesion promotion in rubber.
The types of amino resins that Cytec
and UCB manufacture are used as crosslinking agents in thermoset surface
coatings for a variety of applications,
including automotive coatings, coil
coatings, can coatings, appliance
coatings, and general maintenance
coatings. These types of resins are also
used, primarily in tires, to promote the
adhesion of rubber to materials such as
steel or fiber. As the proposed
complaint describes, there are no
effective substitutes for amino resins in
the applications in which they are used.
The proposed complaint also alleges
that the relevant geographic market in
which to assess the impact of the
proposed acquisition is no broader than
North America and is potentially
limited to the United States.
The proposed complaint alleges that
the markets for amino resins for
industrial liquid coatings and adhesion
promotion in rubber are highly
concentrated, that Cytec and UCB have
been for many years the two major
competitors in these markets, and that
these companies compete with one
another across a wide range of amino
resin grades and applications in which
customers have qualified their resins for
use. As the proposed complaint
describes, customers have relied on the
competition between these companies
to maintain competitive amino resin
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:06 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
prices. The proposed complaint alleges
that the proposed acquisition of UCB’s
Surface Specialties division by Cytec
would reduce competition by
eliminating the direct competition that
has existed between these two
companies. The proposed complaint
further alleges that entry into the
relevant markets would not be timely,
likely, or sufficient to deter or offset the
acquisition’s adverse competitive
effects. Other firms would not in the
foreseeable future be able to offer the
range of grades that Cytec and UCB have
developed over the years, nor would
they be able to meet the requirements
necessary to commercially qualify their
resins for use in demanding customer
applications.
II. The Consent Agreement
The proposed Order requires that
Cytec divest the UCB Amino Resins
Business to an acquirer approved by the
Commission within one-hundred and
eighty (180) days from the date upon
which the Commission accepts the
proposed Order for public comment.
The divested business includes two
manufacturing facilities, in
Massachusetts and in Germany, where
UCB manufactures amino resins,
together with UCB’s rights to obtain
amino resins pursuant to a tolling
agreement between UCB and Solutia
Canada, Inc. The divested business also
includes certain lines of additives that
are the only other products that UCB
manufactures at the plant in Germany.
In connection with the divestiture,
Cytec is required to divest to an acquirer
the set of assets that comprise UCB’s
amino resins business. In addition to the
manufacturing assets, for example,
Cytec is required to divest the patents
and other intellectual property that UCB
has relied upon in its amino resins
business, the sales and marketing
materials, including customer
information, that UCB has relied upon,
and the other books and records of the
business. Further, Cytec is required to
assign the different contracts relating to
the amino resins business, and to secure
all consents necessary for the
divestiture. Cytec is also required, until
the divestiture is completed, to take the
steps necessary to maintain the viability
of the UCB Amino Resins Business. The
acquirer of the divested assets would
have the opportunity, without
interference from Cytec, to interview
and potentially hire key UCB personnel
who have been involved in supporting
all aspects of the company’s amino
resins business.
The proposed Order also provides
that if Cytec does not complete its
divestiture within the specified six-
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11673
month period, the Commission may
appoint a Divestiture Trustee to divest
the UCB Amino Resins Business in a
manner acceptable to the Commission.
The proposed Order also provides for
the Commission to appoint a Monitor
Trustee to oversee Cytec’s compliance
with the terms of the proposed Order
and the divestiture agreements that
Cytec enters pursuant to the proposed
Order.
The proposed Order to Hold Separate
and Maintain Assets that is also
included in the Consent Agreement
requires that Cytec hold separate and
maintain the viability and marketability
of UCB’s Amino Resins Business as a
viable and competitive operation until
the business is transferred to the
Commission-approved acquirer.
Furthermore, it contains measures
designed to ensure that no material
confidential information is exchanged
between Cytec and the UCB Amino
Resins Business (except as otherwise
provided in the Order to Hold Separate
and Maintain Assets) and measures
designed to prevent interim harm to
competition in the relevant markets
pending divestiture. The Order to Hold
Separate and Maintain Assets provides
for the Commission to appoint a Hold
Separate Trustee who is charged with
the duty of monitoring Cytec’s
compliance with the Order to Hold
Separate and Maintain Assets.
The proposed Order requires Cytec to
provide the Commission, within thirty
(30) days from the date the Order
becomes final, a verified written report
setting forth in detail the manner and
form in which Cytec intends to comply,
is complying, and has complied with
the provisions relating to the proposed
Order and the Order to Hold Separate
and Maintain Assets. The proposed
Order further requires Cytec to provide
the Commission with a report of
compliance with the Order every thirty
(30) days after the date when the Order
becomes final until the divestiture has
been completed.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
proposed Order. This analysis is not
intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the Consent
Agreement, the proposed Order, or the
Order to Hold Separate and Maintain
Assets, or in any way to modify the
terms of the Consent Agreement, the
proposed Order, or the Order to Hold
Separate and Maintain Assets.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–4592 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11672-11673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4592]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 041 0203]
Cytec Industries Inc.; Analysis To Aid Public Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed Consent Agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
violations of Federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or
practices or unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to
Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft
complaint that accompanies the consent agreement and the terms of the
consent order--embodied in the consent agreement--that would settle
these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 30, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to ``Cytec Industries Inc., File No.
041 0203,'' to facilitate the organization of comments. A comment filed
in paper form should include this reference both in the text and on the
envelope, and should be mailed or delivered to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission/Office of the Secretary, Room H-159, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580. Comments containing
confidential material must be filed in paper form, as explained in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. The FTC is requesting that any
comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or overnight service, if
possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area and at the
Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security precautions.
Comments filed in electronic form (except comments containing any
confidential material) should be sent to the following e-mail box:
consentagreement@ftc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Tovsky, FTC, Bureau of
Competition, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202)
326-2634.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and Sec. 2.34 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given
that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order
to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to
final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record
for a period of thirty (30) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public
Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the
allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of
the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page
(for March 1, 2005), on the World Wide Web, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/
2005/03/index.htm. A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public
Reference Room, Room 130-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-2222.
Public comments are invited, and may be filed with the Commission
in either paper or electronic form. Written comments must be submitted
on or before March 30, 2005. Comments should refer to ``Cytec
Industries Inc., File No. 041 0203,'' to facilitate the organization of
comments. A comment filed in paper form should include this reference
both in the text and on the envelope, and should be mailed or delivered
to the following address: Federal Trade Commission/Office of the
Secretary, Room H-159, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20580. If the comment contains any material for which confidential
treatment is requested, it must be filed in paper (rather than
electronic) form, and the first page of the document must be clearly
labeled ``Confidential.'' \1\ The FTC is requesting that any comment
filed in paper form be sent by courier or overnight service, if
possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area and at the
Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security precautions.
Comments filed in electronic form should be sent to the following e-
mail box: consentagreement@ftc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Commission Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The comment must be
accompanied by an explicit request for confidential treatment,
including the factual and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from
the public record. The request will be granted or denied by the
Commission's General Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the
public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. All timely and responsive public comments, whether filed
in paper or electronic form, will be considered by the Commission, and
will be available to the public on the FTC Web site, to the extent
practicable, at https://www.ftc.gov. As a matter of discretion, the FTC
makes every effort to remove home contact information for individuals
from the public comments it receives before placing those comments on
the FTC Web site. More information, including routine uses permitted by
the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's privacy policy, at https://
www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
Analysis To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') has accepted, subject
to final approval, an Agreement Containing Consent Orders (``Consent
Agreement'') from Cytec Industries Inc. (``Cytec''). The Consent
Agreement is intended to resolve anticompetitive effects stemming from
Cytec's proposed acquisition of the Surface Specialties Business of UCB
S.A. (``UCB''). The Consent Agreement includes a proposed Decision and
Order (``Order'') that would require Cytec to divest UCB assets
relating to the research, development, marketing, sale, and production
of amino resins (``UCB Amino Resins Business''). The Consent Agreement
also includes an Order to Hold Separate and Maintain Assets, which
requires Cytec to preserve the UCB Amino Resins Business as a viable,
competitive, and ongoing operation until the divestiture is achieved.
The Consent Agreement, if finally accepted by the Commission, would
settle charges that Cytec's proposed acquisition of UCB's Surface
Specialties
[[Page 11673]]
Business may have substantially lessened competition in the markets for
amino resins for: (1) Industrial liquid coatings; and (2) adhesion
promotion in rubber. The Commission has reason to believe that Cytec's
proposed acquisition of UCB's Surface Specialties Business would have
violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act and Section 5 of the Federal
Trade Commission Act.
The proposed Order has been placed on the public record for thirty
(30) days to receive comments by interested persons. Comments received
during this period will become part of the public record. After thirty
(30) days, the Commission will review the Consent Agreement and
comments received and decide whether to withdraw its agreement or make
final the Consent Agreement's proposed Order and Order to Hold Separate
and Maintain Assets.
I. Amino Resins for Industrial Liquid Coatings and Adhesion Promotion
in Rubber
According to the Commission's proposed complaint, the relevant
product markets in which to analyze the effects of Cytec's proposed
acquisition of UCB's Surface Specialties Business are the manufacture
and sale of amino resins for: (1) Industrial liquid coatings; and (2)
adhesion promotion in rubber. The types of amino resins that Cytec and
UCB manufacture are used as cross-linking agents in thermoset surface
coatings for a variety of applications, including automotive coatings,
coil coatings, can coatings, appliance coatings, and general
maintenance coatings. These types of resins are also used, primarily in
tires, to promote the adhesion of rubber to materials such as steel or
fiber. As the proposed complaint describes, there are no effective
substitutes for amino resins in the applications in which they are
used. The proposed complaint also alleges that the relevant geographic
market in which to assess the impact of the proposed acquisition is no
broader than North America and is potentially limited to the United
States.
The proposed complaint alleges that the markets for amino resins
for industrial liquid coatings and adhesion promotion in rubber are
highly concentrated, that Cytec and UCB have been for many years the
two major competitors in these markets, and that these companies
compete with one another across a wide range of amino resin grades and
applications in which customers have qualified their resins for use. As
the proposed complaint describes, customers have relied on the
competition between these companies to maintain competitive amino resin
prices. The proposed complaint alleges that the proposed acquisition of
UCB's Surface Specialties division by Cytec would reduce competition by
eliminating the direct competition that has existed between these two
companies. The proposed complaint further alleges that entry into the
relevant markets would not be timely, likely, or sufficient to deter or
offset the acquisition's adverse competitive effects. Other firms would
not in the foreseeable future be able to offer the range of grades that
Cytec and UCB have developed over the years, nor would they be able to
meet the requirements necessary to commercially qualify their resins
for use in demanding customer applications.
II. The Consent Agreement
The proposed Order requires that Cytec divest the UCB Amino Resins
Business to an acquirer approved by the Commission within one-hundred
and eighty (180) days from the date upon which the Commission accepts
the proposed Order for public comment. The divested business includes
two manufacturing facilities, in Massachusetts and in Germany, where
UCB manufactures amino resins, together with UCB's rights to obtain
amino resins pursuant to a tolling agreement between UCB and Solutia
Canada, Inc. The divested business also includes certain lines of
additives that are the only other products that UCB manufactures at the
plant in Germany. In connection with the divestiture, Cytec is required
to divest to an acquirer the set of assets that comprise UCB's amino
resins business. In addition to the manufacturing assets, for example,
Cytec is required to divest the patents and other intellectual property
that UCB has relied upon in its amino resins business, the sales and
marketing materials, including customer information, that UCB has
relied upon, and the other books and records of the business. Further,
Cytec is required to assign the different contracts relating to the
amino resins business, and to secure all consents necessary for the
divestiture. Cytec is also required, until the divestiture is
completed, to take the steps necessary to maintain the viability of the
UCB Amino Resins Business. The acquirer of the divested assets would
have the opportunity, without interference from Cytec, to interview and
potentially hire key UCB personnel who have been involved in supporting
all aspects of the company's amino resins business.
The proposed Order also provides that if Cytec does not complete
its divestiture within the specified six-month period, the Commission
may appoint a Divestiture Trustee to divest the UCB Amino Resins
Business in a manner acceptable to the Commission. The proposed Order
also provides for the Commission to appoint a Monitor Trustee to
oversee Cytec's compliance with the terms of the proposed Order and the
divestiture agreements that Cytec enters pursuant to the proposed
Order.
The proposed Order to Hold Separate and Maintain Assets that is
also included in the Consent Agreement requires that Cytec hold
separate and maintain the viability and marketability of UCB's Amino
Resins Business as a viable and competitive operation until the
business is transferred to the Commission-approved acquirer.
Furthermore, it contains measures designed to ensure that no material
confidential information is exchanged between Cytec and the UCB Amino
Resins Business (except as otherwise provided in the Order to Hold
Separate and Maintain Assets) and measures designed to prevent interim
harm to competition in the relevant markets pending divestiture. The
Order to Hold Separate and Maintain Assets provides for the Commission
to appoint a Hold Separate Trustee who is charged with the duty of
monitoring Cytec's compliance with the Order to Hold Separate and
Maintain Assets.
The proposed Order requires Cytec to provide the Commission, within
thirty (30) days from the date the Order becomes final, a verified
written report setting forth in detail the manner and form in which
Cytec intends to comply, is complying, and has complied with the
provisions relating to the proposed Order and the Order to Hold
Separate and Maintain Assets. The proposed Order further requires Cytec
to provide the Commission with a report of compliance with the Order
every thirty (30) days after the date when the Order becomes final
until the divestiture has been completed.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the
proposed Order. This analysis is not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the Consent Agreement, the proposed Order, or the
Order to Hold Separate and Maintain Assets, or in any way to modify the
terms of the Consent Agreement, the proposed Order, or the Order to
Hold Separate and Maintain Assets.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-4592 Filed 3-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P