Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension, 11662-11666 [05-4590]
Download as PDF
11662
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
101 Market Street, San Francisco,
California 94105-1579:
1. FNB Bancorp, South San Francisco,
California; to acquire 100 percent of the
voting shares of Sequoia National Bank,
San Francisco, California.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, March 3, 2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05–4544 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Extension
Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘FTC’’).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The information collection
requirements described below will be
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for review, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
FTC is seeking public comments on its
proposal to extend through June 30,
2008, the current Paperwork Reduction
Act clearances for information
collection requirements contained in
three Commission Rules. Those
clearances expire on June 30, 2005.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before May 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments.
Comments should refer to ‘‘Paperwork
Comment: FTC File No. P822108’’ to
facilitate the organization of comments.
A comment filed in paper form should
include this reference both in the text
and on the envelope and should be
mailed or delivered to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission/
Office of the Secretary, Room H–159
(Annex X), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20580. The FTC
is requesting that any comment filed in
paper form be sent by courier or
overnight service, if possible, because
U.S. postal mail in the Washington area
and at the Commission is subject to
delay due to heightened security
precautions. Alternatively, comments
may be filed in electronic form (in
ASCII format, WordPerfect, or Microsoft
Word) as part of or as an attachment to
e-mail messages directed to the
following e-mail box:
PaperworkComment@ftc.gov. If the
comment contains any material for
which confidential treatment is
requested, it must be filed in paper
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:06 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
form, and the first page of the document
must be clearly labeled ‘‘Confidential.’’ 1
The FTC Act and other laws the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. All timely and responsive
public comments will be considered by
the Commission and will be available to
the public on the FTC Web site, to the
extent practicable, at https://www.ftc.gov.
As a matter of discretion, the FTC makes
every effort to remove home contact
information for individuals from the
public comments it receives before
placing those comments on the FTC
Web site. More information, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy
Act, may be found in the FTC’s privacy
policy at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/
privacy.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the proposed information
requirements for the Funeral Industry
Practices Rule (‘‘Funeral Rule’’) should
be addressed to Catherine HarringtonMcBride, Attorney, Division of
Marketing Practices, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, Room H–238, 600
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20580, (202) 326–2452. Requests for
additional information or copies of the
proposed information requirements for
the Children’s Online Privacy Protection
Act Rule (‘‘COPPA Rule’’) should be
addressed to Rona Kelner, (202) 326–
2752, or Karen Muoio, (202) 326–2491,
Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, Division of
Advertising Practices, 600 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Mail Drop NJ–3212,
Washington, DC 20580. Requests for
additional information or copies of the
proposed information requirements for
the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Privacy
Rule (‘‘GLBA Rule’’) should be
addressed to Laura Berger, Attorney,
Division of Financial Practices, Bureau
of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, Room S–4429, 601
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20580, (202) 326–3224.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA, Federal agencies must obtain
approval from OMB for each collection
of information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ means
1 Commission Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The
comment must be accompanied by an explicit
request for confidential treatment, including the
factual and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the comment to be
withheld from the public record. The request will
be granted or denied by the Commission’s General
Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the
public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
agency requests or requirements that
members of the public submit reports,
keep records, or provide information to
a third party. 44 U.S.C. 3502(3), 5 CFR
1320.3(c). As required by section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the FTC is
providing this opportunity for public
comment before requesting that OMB
extend the existing paperwork clearance
for the Funeral Rule, 16 CFR part 453
(OMB Control Number 3084–0025); the
COPPA Rule, 16 CFR part 312 (OMB
Control Number 3084–0117); and the
GLBA Rule, 16 CFR part 313 (OMB
Control Number 3084–0121).
The FTC invites comments on: (1)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
1. The Funeral Rule, 16 CFR Part 453
(OMB Control Number 3084–0025)
The Funeral Rule ensures that
consumers who are purchasing funeral
goods and services have accurate
information about the terms and
conditions (especially prices) for such
goods and services. The Rule requires
that funeral providers disclose this
information to consumers and maintain
records to facilitate enforcement of the
Rule. The PRA clearance for the Funeral
Rule was scheduled to expire on March
31, 2005. On February 7, 2005, the OMB
granted the FTC’s request for a shortterm extension to June 30, 2005, to
allow for this opportunity for public
comment.
The estimated burden associated with
the collection of information required
by the Rule is 21,500 hours for
recordkeeping, 104,545 hours for
disclosures, and 43,000 hours for
training, for a total of 169,000 hours
(rounded to the nearest thousand). This
estimate is based on the number of
funeral providers (approximately
21,500),2 the number of funerals
2 The estimated number of funeral providers is
from data provided on the National Funeral
Directors Association (‘‘NFDA’’) Web site (https://
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
annually (approximately 2.4 million),3
and the time needed to fulfill the
information collection tasks required by
the Rule. The methodology followed in
deriving burden estimates for the
existing clearance is detailed in an April
11, 2002, Federal Register Notice that
responded to a comment by the National
Funeral Directors Association (‘‘NFDA’’)
regarding the FTC’s 2001 request for an
extension of the clearance. See 67 FR
17691.
Recordkeeping: The Rule requires that
funeral providers retain copies of price
lists and statements of funeral goods
and services selected by consumers.
Based on a maximum average burden of
one hour per provider per year for this
task, the total burden for the 21,500
providers is 21,500 hours. This estimate
is lower than FTC staff’s 2002 estimate
of 22,300 hours due to a decrease in the
number of funeral providers.
Disclosure: The Rule requires that
funeral providers: (1) Maintain current
price lists for funeral goods and
services, (2) provide written
documentation of the funeral goods and
services selected by consumers making
funeral arrangements, and (3) provide
information about funeral prices in
response to telephone inquiries.
1. Maintaining current price lists
requires that funeral providers revise
their price lists from time to time
throughout the year to reflect price
changes. Staff estimates, consistent with
its current clearance, that this task
requires a maximum average burden of
two and one-half hours per provider per
year for this task. Thus, the total burden
for 21,500 providers is 53,750 hours.
2. Staff retains its 2002 estimate that
13% of funeral providers prepare
written documentation of funeral goods
and services selected by consumers
specifically due to the Rule’s mandate.
The original rulemaking record
indicated that 87% of funeral providers
provided written documentation of
funeral arrangements, even absent the
Rule’s requirements.4 The NFDA’s 2002
www.nfda.org), which was accessed in January
2005.
3 The estimated number of funerals annually is
taken from the National Center for Health Statistics,
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/. According to NCHS,
2,443,387 deaths occurred in the United States in
2002, the most recent year for which final data is
available. See National Vital Statistics Reports, vol.
53, no. 5 ‘‘Deaths: Final Data for 2002,’’ available
at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr53/
nvsr53_05acc.pdf.
4 The original version of the Funeral Rule
required that funeral providers retain a copy of and
give each customer a separate ‘‘Statement of
Funeral Goods and Services Selected.’’ The 1994
amendments to the Rule eliminated that
requirement, allowing instead for such disclosures
to be incorporated into a written contract, bill of
sale, or other record of a transaction that providers
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:21 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
comment indicates that even before the
Rule became effective, nearly every
funeral home already had been
providing consumers with some kind of
final statement in writing. NFDA stated
that likely only the timing of the
statement’s issuance had changed as a
result of the Rule. Nonetheless, staff
believes it prudent to err, if at all, on the
side of overestimating the burden
imposed by the Rule.
According to the rulemaking record,
these providers are typically the
smallest funeral homes. The written
documentation requirement can be
satisfied through the use of a standard
form (an example of which the FTC has
provided to all funeral providers in its
compliance guide).5 Based on an
estimate that these smaller funeral
homes arrange, on average,
approximately twenty funerals per year
and that it would take each of them
about three minutes to record prices for
each consumer on the standard form,
FTC staff estimates that the total burden
associated with the written
documentation requirement is one hour
per provider not already in compliance,
for a total of 2,795 hours [(21,500
funeral providers × 13%) × (20
statements per year × 3 minutes per
statement)].
3. The Funeral Rule also requires
funeral providers to answer telephone
inquiries about the provider’s offerings
or prices. Industry data indicate that
only about 12% of funeral purchasers
make telephone inquiries, with each call
lasting an estimated ten minutes. Thus,
assuming that the average purchaser
who makes telephone inquiries places
one call per funeral to determine prices,
the estimated burden is 48,000 hours
(2.4 million funerals per year × 12% ×
10 minutes per inquiry), a slight
increase over the 46,000 hours
estimated by staff in 2002 due to the
increase in the number of funerals per
year. This burden likely will decline
over time as consumers increasingly
rely on the Internet for funeral price
information.
In sum, the burden due to the Rule’s
disclosure requirements totals 104,545
hours (53,750 + 2,795 + 48,000).
Training: In addition to the
recordkeeping and disclosure-related
tasks noted above, funeral homes may
also have training requirements
specifically attributable to the Rule.
While staff believes that annual training
burdens associated with the Rule should
use to memorialize sales agreements with
customers.
5 The FTC has provided its compliance guide to
all funeral providers at no cost, and additional
copies are available on the FTC Web site, https://
www.ftc.gov, or by mail.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11663
be minimal because Rule compliance is
generally included in continuing
education requirements for licensing
and voluntary certification programs,
staff estimates that, industry-wide,
funeral homes should incur no more
than 43,000 hours related to training
specific to the Rule each year. This
estimate is consistent with staff’s
assumption for the current clearance
that an ‘‘average’’ funeral home consists
of approximately five employees (fulltime and part-time employment
combined), but with no more than four
of them having tasks specifically
associated with the Funeral Rule. Staff
retains its estimate that each of the four
employees (three directors and a clerical
employee) per firm would each require
one-half hour, at most, per year, for such
training. Thus, total estimated time for
training is 43,000 hours (4 employees
per firm × 1⁄2 hour × 21,500 providers).
Estimated annual cost burden:
$4,882,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand ($3,654,000 in labor costs and
$1,228,000 in non-labor costs).
Labor costs: Labor costs are derived
by applying appropriate hourly cost
figures to the burden hours described
above. The hourly rates used below are
averages.
Clerical personnel, at an hourly rate of
$13, can perform the recordkeeping
tasks required under the Rule. Based on
the estimated hour burden of 21,500
hours, the estimated cost burden for
recordkeeping is $279,500 ($13 per hour
× 21,500 hours).
The two and one-half hours required
of each provider, on average, to update
price lists should consist of
approximately one and one-half hours
of managerial or professional time, at
$27.50 per hour, and one hour of
clerical time, at $13 per hour, for a total
of $54.25 per provider 6 [($27.50 per
hour × 1.5 hours) + ($13.00 per hour ×
1 hour)]. Thus, the estimated total cost
burden for maintaining price lists is
$1,166,375 ($54.25 per provider ×
21,500 providers).
The cost of providing written
documentation of the goods and
services selected by the consumer is
2,795 hours of managerial or
professional time at approximately
$27.50 per hour, or $76,862.50 (2,795
hours × $27.50 per hour).
6 National Compensation Survey: Occupational
Wages in the United States, July 2003, U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics
(Aug. 2004) (‘‘BLS National Compensation Survey’’)
(citing the mean hourly earnings for funeral
directors as $21.30/hour), available at https://
www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncbl0636.pdf. As in the
past, staff has increased this figure on the
assumption that the owner or managing director,
who would be paid at a slightly higher rate, would
be responsible for making pricing decisions.
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
11664
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
The cost of responding to telephone
inquiries about offerings or prices is
48,000 hours of managerial or
professional time at $27.50 per hour, or
$1,320,000 (48,000 hours × $27.50 per
hour).
The cost of training licensed and nonlicensed funeral home staff to comply
with the Funeral Rule is two hours per
funeral home, with four employees of
varying ranks each spending one-half
hour on training. Consistent with
estimates in the current clearance, the
Commission is assuming that three
funeral directors, at hourly wages of
$27.50, $20, and $15, respectively, as
well as one clerical or administrative
staff member, at $13 per hour, require
such training, for a total burden of
43,000 hours (21,500 funeral homes × 2
hours total per establishment), and
$811,625 [($27.50 + $20 + $15 + $13) ×
1⁄2 hour per employee × 21,500 funeral
homes].
The total labor cost of the three
disclosure requirements imposed by the
Funeral Rule is $2,563,237.50
($1,166,375 + $76,862.50 + $1,320,000).
The total labor cost for recordkeeping is
$279,500. The total labor cost for
disclosures, recordkeeping and training
is $3,654,000 ($279,500 for
recordkeeping + $811,625 for training +
$2,563,237.50 for disclosures), rounded
to the nearest thousand.
Capital or other non-labor costs: The
Rule imposes minimal capital costs and
no current start-up costs. The Rule first
took effect in 1984 and the revised Rule
took effect in 1994, so funeral providers
should already have in place capital
equipment to carry out tasks associated
with Rule compliance. Moreover, most
funeral homes already have access, for
other business purposes, to the ordinary
office equipment needed for
compliance, so the Rule likely imposes
minimal additional capital expense.
Compliance with the Rule, however,
does entail some expense to funeral
providers for printing and duplication
of price lists. Assuming that two price
lists per funeral/cremation are created
by industry to adhere to the Rule,
4,800,000 copies per year are made for
a total cost of $1,200,000 (2,400,000
funerals per year × 2 copies per funeral
× $.25 per copy). In addition, the
estimated 2,795 providers not already
providing written documentation of
funeral arrangements apart from the
Rule will incur additional printing and
copying costs. Assuming that those
providers use the standard two-page
form shown in the Compliance Guide, at
twenty-five cents per page, at an average
of twenty funerals per year, the added
cost burden would be $27,950 (2,795
providers × 20 funerals per year × 2
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:06 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
pages per funeral × $.25). Thus,
estimated non-labor costs are
$1,228,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand.
2. The COPPA Rule, 16 CFR Part 312
(OMB Control Number 3084–0117)
The COPPA Rule prohibits unfair and
deceptive acts and practices in
connection with the collection and use
of personally identifiable information
from and about children on the Internet.
Estimated annual hours burden: 2000
hours (rounded to the nearest
thousand).
Disclosure Requirements: 1800 hours.
The COPPA Rule contains certain
statutorily-required notice requirements,
which constitute a ‘‘collection of
information’’ under the PRA:
(a) the Rule requires each Web site
and online service operator directed to
children, and any Web site or online
service operator with actual knowledge
that it is collecting personal information
from children, to provide notice of how
it collects, uses, and discloses such
information and, with exceptions, to
obtain the prior consent of the child’s
parent in order to engage in such
collection, use, and disclosure;
(b) the Rule requires the operator to
provide the parent with notice of the
specific types of personal information
being collected from the child, to give
the parent the opportunity to forbid the
operator at any time from further
collecting, using, or maintaining such
information, and to provide reasonable
means for the parent to obtain the
information;
(c) The Rule prohibits a child’s
participation in a game, a prize offer, or
other activity from being conditioned on
the child’s disclosure of more personal
information than is ‘‘reasonably
necessary’’ for the child to participate in
that activity; and
(d) The Rule requires Web site and
online service operators to establish
procedures that protect the
confidentiality, security, and integrity of
personal information collected from
children.
After consulting with the COPPA safe
harbor programs and industry groups,
the FTC staff retains its earlier estimate
that roughly thirty new Web entrants
each year will fall within the Rule’s
coverage. Web site operators that have
previously created or adjusted their sites
to comply with the Rule will incur no
further burden associated with the Rule,
unless they opt to change their policies
and information collection in ways that
will further invoke the Rule’s
provisions. Moreover, the staff believes
that existing COPPA-compliant
operators who introduce additional sites
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
beyond those they already have created
will incur minimal, if any, incremental
PRA burden. This is because such
operators already have been through the
start-up phase and can carry over the
results of that to the new sites they
create.
Staff also retains its prior estimate
that on average, new entrants will spend
approximately sixty hours crafting a
privacy policy, designing a mechanism
to provide the required notice, and
posting it online. Accordingly, the staff
estimates that complying with the
Rule’s disclosure requirements will
require approximately 1,800 hours (30
new Web entrants x 60 hours per
entrant). Consistent with prior
estimates, FTC staff estimates that the
time spent on compliance would be
apportioned five to one between legal
(lawyers or similar professionals) and
technical (computer programmers)
personnel. The staff therefore estimates
that lawyers or similar professionals
who craft privacy policies will account
for 1,500 of the 1,800 hours required.
Computer programmers responsible for
posting the policy will account for the
remaining 300 hours.
Voluntary Reporting Requirements for
Safe Harbor Participants: 130 hours.
Operators can comply with the Rule
by meeting the terms of industry selfregulatory guidelines that the
Commission approves after notice and
comment.7 While the submission of
industry self-regulatory guidelines to
the agency is voluntary, the Rule
includes specific reporting requirements
that all safe harbor applicants must
provide to receive Commission
approval.
FTC staff retains its estimate that it
would require, on average, 265 hours
per new safe harbor program applicant
to prepare and submit its safe harbor
proposal in accordance with Section
312.12(c) of the Rule. Industry sources
have confirmed recently that this
estimate is reasonable and advised that
all of this time would be attributable to
the efforts of lawyers. Based on past
experience and industry input, the staff
believes that no more than one
applicant every two years will submit a
request. Thus, the burden attributable to
this requirement would be
approximately 130 hours per year (265
hours/2 years).
The staff believes that most of the
records submitted in connection with a
safe harbor request would be records
that marketing and online industry
representatives have kept in the
7 See Section 312.10(c). Approved self-regulatory
guidelines can be found on the FTC’s Web site at
https://www.ftc.gov/privacy/safeharbor/shp.htm.
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
11665
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
ordinary course of business before the
Rule was issued. Any incremental effort
associated with maintaining the results
of independent assessments under
Section 312.10(d)(3) would also be in
the normal course of business. Thus, in
accordance with the regulations
implementing the PRA, the burden
estimate does not include effort
expended for these activities. 5 CFR
1320.3(b)(2).
Accordingly, the staff estimates that
total hours per year for the disclosure
requirements affecting new Web
entrants and the reporting requirements
for safe harbor applications would be
approximately 2000 hours (rounded to
the nearest thousand).
Labor costs: Labor costs are derived
by applying appropriate hourly cost
figures to the burden hours described
above. The staff conservatively assumes
hourly rates of $85 and $30,
respectively, for lawyers or similar
professionals and computer
programmers.8 Based on these inputs,
the staff further estimates that the
associated annual labor costs for new
entrants would be $136,500 [(1,500
hours × $85 per hour for legal) + (300
hours × $30 per hour for computer
programmers)] and for safe harbor
applicants would be $11,050 (130 hours
per year × $85 per hour), for a total labor
cost of $148,000 (rounded to the nearest
thousand).
Non-labor costs: Because Web sites
will already be equipped with the
computer equipment and software
necessary to comply with the Rule’s
notice requirements, the sole costs
incurred by the Web sites are the
aforementioned estimated labor costs.
Similarly, industry members should
already have in place the means to
retain and store the records that must be
maintained under the Rule’s safe harbor
recordkeeping provisions, because they
are likely to have been keeping these
records independent of the Rule.
3. The GLBA Rule, 16 CFR Part 313
(OMB Control Number 3084–1021)
The GLBA Rule is designed to ensure
that customers and consumers, subject
to certain exceptions, will have access
to the privacy policies of the financial
institutions with which they conduct
business. As mandated by the GLBA, 15
U.S.C. 6801–6809, the Rule requires
financial institutions to disclose to
consumers: (1) Initial notice of the
financial institution’s privacy policy
when establishing a customer
relationship with a consumer and/or
before sharing a consumer’s non-public
personal information with certain
nonaffiliated third parties; (2) notice of
the consumer’s right to opt out of
information sharing with such parties;
(3) annual notice of the institution’s
privacy policy to any continuing
customer; and (4) notice of changes in
the institution’s practices on
information sharing. These
requirements are subject to the PRA.
The Rule does not require
recordkeeping.
Estimated annual hours burden: As
noted in the original burden estimate for
the GLBA Rule, determining the
paperwork burden of the Rule’s
disclosure requirements is very difficult
because of the highly diverse group of
affected entities, consisting of financial
institutions not regulated by a Federal
financial regulatory agency. See 15
U.S.C. 6805 (committing to the
Commission’s jurisdiction entities that
are not specifically subject to another
agency’s jurisdiction).
The burden estimates represent the
FTC staff’s best assessment, based on its
knowledge and expertise relating to the
financial institutions subject to the
Commission’s jurisdiction under this
law. To derive these estimates, staff
considered the wide variations in
covered entities. In some instances,
covered entities may make the required
disclosures in the ordinary course of
business, apart from the GLBA Rule. In
addition, some entities may use highly
automated means to provide the
required disclosures, while others may
rely on methods requiring more manual
effort. The burden estimates shown
below include the time that may be
necessary to train staff to comply with
the regulations. These figures are
averages based on staff’s best estimate of
the burden incurred over the broad
spectrum of covered entities.
Staff retains its prior estimate of the
number of entities each year that will
address the GLBA Rule for the first time
(5,000) and its estimate of established
entities already familiar with the Rule
(100,000). While the number of
established entities familiar with the
Rule would theoretically increase each
year with the addition of new entrants,
staff retain its previous estimate of
established entities in consideration of
the fact that a number of the established
entities will close in any given year, and
the difficulty of establishing a more
precise estimate. Staff’s burden
estimates for new entrants and
established entities are detailed in the
charts below.
Start-up hours and labor costs for new
entities:
Labor cost per
event* (per respondent)
(dollars)
Approx. number of respondents
20
$718.40
5,000
100,000
$3,592,000
5
68.85
5,000
25,000
344,250
10
283.70
5,000
50,000
1,418,500
15
206.55
5,000
75,000
1,032,750
$28.37 professional/technical.
10
283.70
5,000
50,000
1,418,500
.........................................
........................
........................
........................
300,000
7,806,000
Event
Hourly wage and labor
category
Reviewing internal policies and developing GLBAimplementing instructions**.
Creating disclosure document or electronic disclosure (including initial, annual, and opt out disclosures).
$35.92 managerial/professional.
$13.77 clerical ................
$28.37 professional/technical.
$13.77 clerical ................
Disseminating initial disclosure (including opt out
notices).
Total ..................................................................
Hours per
respondent
Approx. total
annual hrs.
Approx. total
labor costs
(dollars)
* Staff
calculated labor costs by applying appropriate hourly cost figures to burden hours. The hourly rates used were based on mean wages for managerial/professional time (e.g., compliance evaluation and/or planning), professional/technical time (e.g., designing and producing notices, reviewing and updating information systems), and clerical time (e.g., reproduction tasks, filing, and, where applicable to the given event, typing or mailing). See BLS National Compensation Survey, Table 3,
available at https://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncbl0635.pdf. Labor cost totals reflect solely that of the commercial entities affected. Staff assumes that the time required of
consumers to respond affirmatively to respondents’ opt-out programs (be it manually or electronically) would be minimal.
8 FTC staff estimates average legal costs at $85
hour, which is consistent with Commission
experience with other information collection
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:21 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
activities. The $30 estimate for computer
programmers is based on the BLS National
Compensation Survey, which indicates the mean
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
hourly wage rate for computer programmers as
$29.53.
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
11666
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
** Reviewing instructions includes all efforts performed by or for the respondent to: determine whether and to what extent the respondent is covered by an agency
collection of information, understand the nature of the request, and determine the appropriate response (including the creation and dissemination of document and/or
electronic disclosures).
Burden hours and costs for
established entities:
Burden for established entities
already familiar with the Rule
predictably would be less than for startup entities because start-up costs, such
as crafting a privacy policy, are
generally one-time costs and have
Hours per respondent*
Approx. number of respondents**
managerial/professional
clerical ..........................
professional/technical ..
clerical ..........................
professional/technical ..
4
15
5
15
5
70,000
70,000
70,000
1,000
1,000
280,000
1,050,000
350,000
15,000
5,000
$10,001,600
14,458,500
9,929,500
206,550
141,850
..................................................
........................
........................
1,700,000
34,738,000
Hourly wage and labor
category
Event
Reviewing GLBA-implementing policies and practices ..............
Disseminating annual disclosure ................................................
Changes to privacy policies and related disclosures .................
Total .....................................................................................
already been incurred. Staff’s best
estimate of the average burden for these
entities is as follows:
$35.72
$13.77
$28.37
$13.77
$28.37
Approx. total
annual hours
Approx. total
labor costs
(dollars)
* Staff
calculated labor costs by applying appropriate hourly cost figures to burden hours. The hourly wage rates used were based on mean wages for managerial/
professional time (e.g., compliance evaluation and/or planning), skilled professional/technical time (e.g., designing and producing notices, reviewing and updating information systems), and clerical time (e.g., reproduction tasks, filing, and, where applicable to the given event, typing or mailing). (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Table 3,
July 2003; https://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncbl0635.pdf). Consumers have a continuing right to opt-out, as well as a right to revoke their opt-out at any time. When a
respondent changes its information sharing practices, consumers are again given the opportunity to opt-out. Again, staff assumes that the time required of consumers
to respond affirmatively to respondents’ opt-out programs (be it manually or electronically) would be minimal.
** The estimate of respondents is based on the following assumptions: (1) 100,000 respondents, approximately 70% of whom maintain customer relationships exceeding one year, (2) no more than 1% (1,000) of whom make additional changes to privacy policies at any time other than the occasion of the annual notice; and (3)
such changes will occur no more often than once per year.
As calculated above, the total annual
PRA burden for all affected entities in
a given year would be 2,000,000 hours
and $42,544,000.
Estimated Capital/Other Non-Labor
Costs Burden: Staff estimates that the
capital or other non-labor costs
associated with the document requests
are minimal. Covered entities will
already be equipped to provide written
notices (e.g., computers with word
processing programs, typewriters,
copying machines, mailing capabilities).
Most likely, only entities that already
have on-line capabilities will offer
consumers the choice to receive notices
via electronic format. As such, these
entities will already be equipped with
the computer equipment and software
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:06 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
necessary to disseminate the required
disclosures via electronic means.
Christian S. White,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05–4590 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Granting of Request for Early
Termination of the Waiting Period
Under the Premerger Notification
Rules
Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15
U.S.C. 18a, as added by Title II of the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976, requires
persons contemplating certain mergers
or acquisitions to give the Federal Trade
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission and the Assistant Attorney
General advance notice and to wait
designated periods before
consummation of such plans. Section
7A(b)(2) of the Act permits the agencies,
in individual cases, to terminate this
waiting period prior to its expiration
and requires that notice of this action be
published in the Federal Register.
The following transactions were
granted early termination of the waiting
period provided by law and the
premerger notification rules. The grants
were made by the Federal Trade
Commission and the Assistant Attorney
General for the Antitrust Division of the
Department of Justice. Neither agency
intends to take any action with respect
to these proposed acquisitions during
the applicable waiting period.
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11662-11666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4590]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Extension
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'' or ``FTC'').
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The information collection requirements described below will
be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for
review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C.
3501-3520). The FTC is seeking public comments on its proposal to
extend through June 30, 2008, the current Paperwork Reduction Act
clearances for information collection requirements contained in three
Commission Rules. Those clearances expire on June 30, 2005.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments.
Comments should refer to ``Paperwork Comment: FTC File No. P822108'' to
facilitate the organization of comments. A comment filed in paper form
should include this reference both in the text and on the envelope and
should be mailed or delivered to the following address: Federal Trade
Commission/Office of the Secretary, Room H-159 (Annex X), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is requesting
that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or overnight
service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area
and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security
precautions. Alternatively, comments may be filed in electronic form
(in ASCII format, WordPerfect, or Microsoft Word) as part of or as an
attachment to e-mail messages directed to the following e-mail box:
PaperworkComment@ftc.gov. If the comment contains any material for
which confidential treatment is requested, it must be filed in paper
form, and the first page of the document must be clearly labeled
``Confidential.'' \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Commission Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The comment must be
accompanied by an explicit request for confidential treatment,
including the factual and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from
the public record. The request will be granted or denied by the
Commission's General Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the
public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. All timely and responsive public comments will be
considered by the Commission and will be available to the public on the
FTC Web site, to the extent practicable, at https://www.ftc.gov. As a
matter of discretion, the FTC makes every effort to remove home contact
information for individuals from the public comments it receives before
placing those comments on the FTC Web site. More information, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's
privacy policy at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the proposed information requirements for the Funeral
Industry Practices Rule (``Funeral Rule'') should be addressed to
Catherine Harrington-McBride, Attorney, Division of Marketing
Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission,
Room H-238, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20580, (202)
326-2452. Requests for additional information or copies of the proposed
information requirements for the Children's Online Privacy Protection
Act Rule (``COPPA Rule'') should be addressed to Rona Kelner, (202)
326-2752, or Karen Muoio, (202) 326-2491, Federal Trade Commission,
Bureau of Consumer Protection, Division of Advertising Practices, 600
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Mail Drop NJ-3212, Washington, DC 20580.
Requests for additional information or copies of the proposed
information requirements for the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act Privacy Rule
(``GLBA Rule'') should be addressed to Laura Berger, Attorney, Division
of Financial Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, Room S-4429, 601 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC
20580, (202) 326-3224.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA, Federal agencies must obtain
approval from OMB for each collection of information they conduct or
sponsor. ``Collection of information'' means agency requests or
requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records,
or provide information to a third party. 44 U.S.C. 3502(3), 5 CFR
1320.3(c). As required by section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the FTC is
providing this opportunity for public comment before requesting that
OMB extend the existing paperwork clearance for the Funeral Rule, 16
CFR part 453 (OMB Control Number 3084-0025); the COPPA Rule, 16 CFR
part 312 (OMB Control Number 3084-0117); and the GLBA Rule, 16 CFR part
313 (OMB Control Number 3084-0121).
The FTC invites comments on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
1. The Funeral Rule, 16 CFR Part 453 (OMB Control Number 3084-0025)
The Funeral Rule ensures that consumers who are purchasing funeral
goods and services have accurate information about the terms and
conditions (especially prices) for such goods and services. The Rule
requires that funeral providers disclose this information to consumers
and maintain records to facilitate enforcement of the Rule. The PRA
clearance for the Funeral Rule was scheduled to expire on March 31,
2005. On February 7, 2005, the OMB granted the FTC's request for a
short-term extension to June 30, 2005, to allow for this opportunity
for public comment.
The estimated burden associated with the collection of information
required by the Rule is 21,500 hours for recordkeeping, 104,545 hours
for disclosures, and 43,000 hours for training, for a total of 169,000
hours (rounded to the nearest thousand). This estimate is based on the
number of funeral providers (approximately 21,500),\2\ the number of
funerals
[[Page 11663]]
annually (approximately 2.4 million),\3\ and the time needed to fulfill
the information collection tasks required by the Rule. The methodology
followed in deriving burden estimates for the existing clearance is
detailed in an April 11, 2002, Federal Register Notice that responded
to a comment by the National Funeral Directors Association (``NFDA'')
regarding the FTC's 2001 request for an extension of the clearance. See
67 FR 17691.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The estimated number of funeral providers is from data
provided on the National Funeral Directors Association (``NFDA'')
Web site (https://www.nfda.org), which was accessed in January 2005.
\3\ The estimated number of funerals annually is taken from the
National Center for Health Statistics, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/.
According to NCHS, 2,443,387 deaths occurred in the United States in
2002, the most recent year for which final data is available. See
National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 53, no. 5 ``Deaths: Final
Data for 2002,'' available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/
nvsr53/nvsr53_05acc.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recordkeeping: The Rule requires that funeral providers retain
copies of price lists and statements of funeral goods and services
selected by consumers. Based on a maximum average burden of one hour
per provider per year for this task, the total burden for the 21,500
providers is 21,500 hours. This estimate is lower than FTC staff's 2002
estimate of 22,300 hours due to a decrease in the number of funeral
providers.
Disclosure: The Rule requires that funeral providers: (1) Maintain
current price lists for funeral goods and services, (2) provide written
documentation of the funeral goods and services selected by consumers
making funeral arrangements, and (3) provide information about funeral
prices in response to telephone inquiries.
1. Maintaining current price lists requires that funeral providers
revise their price lists from time to time throughout the year to
reflect price changes. Staff estimates, consistent with its current
clearance, that this task requires a maximum average burden of two and
one-half hours per provider per year for this task. Thus, the total
burden for 21,500 providers is 53,750 hours.
2. Staff retains its 2002 estimate that 13% of funeral providers
prepare written documentation of funeral goods and services selected by
consumers specifically due to the Rule's mandate. The original
rulemaking record indicated that 87% of funeral providers provided
written documentation of funeral arrangements, even absent the Rule's
requirements.\4\ The NFDA's 2002 comment indicates that even before the
Rule became effective, nearly every funeral home already had been
providing consumers with some kind of final statement in writing. NFDA
stated that likely only the timing of the statement's issuance had
changed as a result of the Rule. Nonetheless, staff believes it prudent
to err, if at all, on the side of overestimating the burden imposed by
the Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The original version of the Funeral Rule required that
funeral providers retain a copy of and give each customer a separate
``Statement of Funeral Goods and Services Selected.'' The 1994
amendments to the Rule eliminated that requirement, allowing instead
for such disclosures to be incorporated into a written contract,
bill of sale, or other record of a transaction that providers use to
memorialize sales agreements with customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the rulemaking record, these providers are typically
the smallest funeral homes. The written documentation requirement can
be satisfied through the use of a standard form (an example of which
the FTC has provided to all funeral providers in its compliance
guide).\5\ Based on an estimate that these smaller funeral homes
arrange, on average, approximately twenty funerals per year and that it
would take each of them about three minutes to record prices for each
consumer on the standard form, FTC staff estimates that the total
burden associated with the written documentation requirement is one
hour per provider not already in compliance, for a total of 2,795 hours
[(21,500 funeral providers x 13%) x (20 statements per year x 3 minutes
per statement)].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The FTC has provided its compliance guide to all funeral
providers at no cost, and additional copies are available on the FTC
Web site, https://www.ftc.gov, or by mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. The Funeral Rule also requires funeral providers to answer
telephone inquiries about the provider's offerings or prices. Industry
data indicate that only about 12% of funeral purchasers make telephone
inquiries, with each call lasting an estimated ten minutes. Thus,
assuming that the average purchaser who makes telephone inquiries
places one call per funeral to determine prices, the estimated burden
is 48,000 hours (2.4 million funerals per year x 12% x 10 minutes per
inquiry), a slight increase over the 46,000 hours estimated by staff in
2002 due to the increase in the number of funerals per year. This
burden likely will decline over time as consumers increasingly rely on
the Internet for funeral price information.
In sum, the burden due to the Rule's disclosure requirements totals
104,545 hours (53,750 + 2,795 + 48,000).
Training: In addition to the recordkeeping and disclosure-related
tasks noted above, funeral homes may also have training requirements
specifically attributable to the Rule. While staff believes that annual
training burdens associated with the Rule should be minimal because
Rule compliance is generally included in continuing education
requirements for licensing and voluntary certification programs, staff
estimates that, industry-wide, funeral homes should incur no more than
43,000 hours related to training specific to the Rule each year. This
estimate is consistent with staff's assumption for the current
clearance that an ``average'' funeral home consists of approximately
five employees (full-time and part-time employment combined), but with
no more than four of them having tasks specifically associated with the
Funeral Rule. Staff retains its estimate that each of the four
employees (three directors and a clerical employee) per firm would each
require one-half hour, at most, per year, for such training. Thus,
total estimated time for training is 43,000 hours (4 employees per firm
x \1/2\ hour x 21,500 providers).
Estimated annual cost burden: $4,882,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand ($3,654,000 in labor costs and $1,228,000 in non-labor costs).
Labor costs: Labor costs are derived by applying appropriate hourly
cost figures to the burden hours described above. The hourly rates used
below are averages.
Clerical personnel, at an hourly rate of $13, can perform the
recordkeeping tasks required under the Rule. Based on the estimated
hour burden of 21,500 hours, the estimated cost burden for
recordkeeping is $279,500 ($13 per hour x 21,500 hours).
The two and one-half hours required of each provider, on average,
to update price lists should consist of approximately one and one-half
hours of managerial or professional time, at $27.50 per hour, and one
hour of clerical time, at $13 per hour, for a total of $54.25 per
provider \6\ [($27.50 per hour x 1.5 hours) + ($13.00 per hour x 1
hour)]. Thus, the estimated total cost burden for maintaining price
lists is $1,166,375 ($54.25 per provider x 21,500 providers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ National Compensation Survey: Occupational Wages in the
United States, July 2003, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics (Aug. 2004) (``BLS National Compensation Survey'')
(citing the mean hourly earnings for funeral directors as $21.30/
hour), available at https://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncbl0636.pdf. As
in the past, staff has increased this figure on the assumption that
the owner or managing director, who would be paid at a slightly
higher rate, would be responsible for making pricing decisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The cost of providing written documentation of the goods and
services selected by the consumer is 2,795 hours of managerial or
professional time at approximately $27.50 per hour, or $76,862.50
(2,795 hours x $27.50 per hour).
[[Page 11664]]
The cost of responding to telephone inquiries about offerings or
prices is 48,000 hours of managerial or professional time at $27.50 per
hour, or $1,320,000 (48,000 hours x $27.50 per hour).
The cost of training licensed and non-licensed funeral home staff
to comply with the Funeral Rule is two hours per funeral home, with
four employees of varying ranks each spending one-half hour on
training. Consistent with estimates in the current clearance, the
Commission is assuming that three funeral directors, at hourly wages of
$27.50, $20, and $15, respectively, as well as one clerical or
administrative staff member, at $13 per hour, require such training,
for a total burden of 43,000 hours (21,500 funeral homes x 2 hours
total per establishment), and $811,625 [($27.50 + $20 + $15 + $13) x
\1/2\ hour per employee x 21,500 funeral homes].
The total labor cost of the three disclosure requirements imposed
by the Funeral Rule is $2,563,237.50 ($1,166,375 + $76,862.50 +
$1,320,000). The total labor cost for recordkeeping is $279,500. The
total labor cost for disclosures, recordkeeping and training is
$3,654,000 ($279,500 for recordkeeping + $811,625 for training +
$2,563,237.50 for disclosures), rounded to the nearest thousand.
Capital or other non-labor costs: The Rule imposes minimal capital
costs and no current start-up costs. The Rule first took effect in 1984
and the revised Rule took effect in 1994, so funeral providers should
already have in place capital equipment to carry out tasks associated
with Rule compliance. Moreover, most funeral homes already have access,
for other business purposes, to the ordinary office equipment needed
for compliance, so the Rule likely imposes minimal additional capital
expense.
Compliance with the Rule, however, does entail some expense to
funeral providers for printing and duplication of price lists. Assuming
that two price lists per funeral/cremation are created by industry to
adhere to the Rule, 4,800,000 copies per year are made for a total cost
of $1,200,000 (2,400,000 funerals per year x 2 copies per funeral x
$.25 per copy). In addition, the estimated 2,795 providers not already
providing written documentation of funeral arrangements apart from the
Rule will incur additional printing and copying costs. Assuming that
those providers use the standard two-page form shown in the Compliance
Guide, at twenty-five cents per page, at an average of twenty funerals
per year, the added cost burden would be $27,950 (2,795 providers x 20
funerals per year x 2 pages per funeral x $.25). Thus, estimated non-
labor costs are $1,228,000, rounded to the nearest thousand.
2. The COPPA Rule, 16 CFR Part 312 (OMB Control Number 3084-0117)
The COPPA Rule prohibits unfair and deceptive acts and practices in
connection with the collection and use of personally identifiable
information from and about children on the Internet.
Estimated annual hours burden: 2000 hours (rounded to the nearest
thousand).
Disclosure Requirements: 1800 hours.
The COPPA Rule contains certain statutorily-required notice
requirements, which constitute a ``collection of information'' under
the PRA:
(a) the Rule requires each Web site and online service operator
directed to children, and any Web site or online service operator with
actual knowledge that it is collecting personal information from
children, to provide notice of how it collects, uses, and discloses
such information and, with exceptions, to obtain the prior consent of
the child's parent in order to engage in such collection, use, and
disclosure;
(b) the Rule requires the operator to provide the parent with
notice of the specific types of personal information being collected
from the child, to give the parent the opportunity to forbid the
operator at any time from further collecting, using, or maintaining
such information, and to provide reasonable means for the parent to
obtain the information;
(c) The Rule prohibits a child's participation in a game, a prize
offer, or other activity from being conditioned on the child's
disclosure of more personal information than is ``reasonably
necessary'' for the child to participate in that activity; and
(d) The Rule requires Web site and online service operators to
establish procedures that protect the confidentiality, security, and
integrity of personal information collected from children.
After consulting with the COPPA safe harbor programs and industry
groups, the FTC staff retains its earlier estimate that roughly thirty
new Web entrants each year will fall within the Rule's coverage. Web
site operators that have previously created or adjusted their sites to
comply with the Rule will incur no further burden associated with the
Rule, unless they opt to change their policies and information
collection in ways that will further invoke the Rule's provisions.
Moreover, the staff believes that existing COPPA-compliant operators
who introduce additional sites beyond those they already have created
will incur minimal, if any, incremental PRA burden. This is because
such operators already have been through the start-up phase and can
carry over the results of that to the new sites they create.
Staff also retains its prior estimate that on average, new entrants
will spend approximately sixty hours crafting a privacy policy,
designing a mechanism to provide the required notice, and posting it
online. Accordingly, the staff estimates that complying with the Rule's
disclosure requirements will require approximately 1,800 hours (30 new
Web entrants x 60 hours per entrant). Consistent with prior estimates,
FTC staff estimates that the time spent on compliance would be
apportioned five to one between legal (lawyers or similar
professionals) and technical (computer programmers) personnel. The
staff therefore estimates that lawyers or similar professionals who
craft privacy policies will account for 1,500 of the 1,800 hours
required. Computer programmers responsible for posting the policy will
account for the remaining 300 hours.
Voluntary Reporting Requirements for Safe Harbor Participants: 130
hours.
Operators can comply with the Rule by meeting the terms of industry
self-regulatory guidelines that the Commission approves after notice
and comment.\7\ While the submission of industry self-regulatory
guidelines to the agency is voluntary, the Rule includes specific
reporting requirements that all safe harbor applicants must provide to
receive Commission approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Section 312.10(c). Approved self-regulatory guidelines
can be found on the FTC's Web site at https://www.ftc.gov/privacy/
safeharbor/shp.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FTC staff retains its estimate that it would require, on average,
265 hours per new safe harbor program applicant to prepare and submit
its safe harbor proposal in accordance with Section 312.12(c) of the
Rule. Industry sources have confirmed recently that this estimate is
reasonable and advised that all of this time would be attributable to
the efforts of lawyers. Based on past experience and industry input,
the staff believes that no more than one applicant every two years will
submit a request. Thus, the burden attributable to this requirement
would be approximately 130 hours per year (265 hours/2 years).
The staff believes that most of the records submitted in connection
with a safe harbor request would be records that marketing and online
industry representatives have kept in the
[[Page 11665]]
ordinary course of business before the Rule was issued. Any incremental
effort associated with maintaining the results of independent
assessments under Section 312.10(d)(3) would also be in the normal
course of business. Thus, in accordance with the regulations
implementing the PRA, the burden estimate does not include effort
expended for these activities. 5 CFR 1320.3(b)(2).
Accordingly, the staff estimates that total hours per year for the
disclosure requirements affecting new Web entrants and the reporting
requirements for safe harbor applications would be approximately 2000
hours (rounded to the nearest thousand).
Labor costs: Labor costs are derived by applying appropriate hourly
cost figures to the burden hours described above. The staff
conservatively assumes hourly rates of $85 and $30, respectively, for
lawyers or similar professionals and computer programmers.\8\ Based on
these inputs, the staff further estimates that the associated annual
labor costs for new entrants would be $136,500 [(1,500 hours x $85 per
hour for legal) + (300 hours x $30 per hour for computer programmers)]
and for safe harbor applicants would be $11,050 (130 hours per year x
$85 per hour), for a total labor cost of $148,000 (rounded to the
nearest thousand).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ FTC staff estimates average legal costs at $85 hour, which
is consistent with Commission experience with other information
collection activities. The $30 estimate for computer programmers is
based on the BLS National Compensation Survey, which indicates the
mean hourly wage rate for computer programmers as $29.53.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-labor costs: Because Web sites will already be equipped with
the computer equipment and software necessary to comply with the Rule's
notice requirements, the sole costs incurred by the Web sites are the
aforementioned estimated labor costs. Similarly, industry members
should already have in place the means to retain and store the records
that must be maintained under the Rule's safe harbor recordkeeping
provisions, because they are likely to have been keeping these records
independent of the Rule.
3. The GLBA Rule, 16 CFR Part 313 (OMB Control Number 3084-1021)
The GLBA Rule is designed to ensure that customers and consumers,
subject to certain exceptions, will have access to the privacy policies
of the financial institutions with which they conduct business. As
mandated by the GLBA, 15 U.S.C. 6801-6809, the Rule requires financial
institutions to disclose to consumers: (1) Initial notice of the
financial institution's privacy policy when establishing a customer
relationship with a consumer and/or before sharing a consumer's non-
public personal information with certain nonaffiliated third parties;
(2) notice of the consumer's right to opt out of information sharing
with such parties; (3) annual notice of the institution's privacy
policy to any continuing customer; and (4) notice of changes in the
institution's practices on information sharing. These requirements are
subject to the PRA. The Rule does not require recordkeeping.
Estimated annual hours burden: As noted in the original burden
estimate for the GLBA Rule, determining the paperwork burden of the
Rule's disclosure requirements is very difficult because of the highly
diverse group of affected entities, consisting of financial
institutions not regulated by a Federal financial regulatory agency.
See 15 U.S.C. 6805 (committing to the Commission's jurisdiction
entities that are not specifically subject to another agency's
jurisdiction).
The burden estimates represent the FTC staff's best assessment,
based on its knowledge and expertise relating to the financial
institutions subject to the Commission's jurisdiction under this law.
To derive these estimates, staff considered the wide variations in
covered entities. In some instances, covered entities may make the
required disclosures in the ordinary course of business, apart from the
GLBA Rule. In addition, some entities may use highly automated means to
provide the required disclosures, while others may rely on methods
requiring more manual effort. The burden estimates shown below include
the time that may be necessary to train staff to comply with the
regulations. These figures are averages based on staff's best estimate
of the burden incurred over the broad spectrum of covered entities.
Staff retains its prior estimate of the number of entities each
year that will address the GLBA Rule for the first time (5,000) and its
estimate of established entities already familiar with the Rule
(100,000). While the number of established entities familiar with the
Rule would theoretically increase each year with the addition of new
entrants, staff retain its previous estimate of established entities in
consideration of the fact that a number of the established entities
will close in any given year, and the difficulty of establishing a more
precise estimate. Staff's burden estimates for new entrants and
established entities are detailed in the charts below.
Start-up hours and labor costs for new entities:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost per
Hourly wage and labor Hours per event* (per Approx. number Approx. total Approx. total
Event category respondent respondent) of respondents annual hrs. labor costs
(dollars) (dollars)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reviewing internal policies and developing $35.92 managerial/ 20 $718.40 5,000 100,000 $3,592,000
GLBA-implementing instructions**. professional.
Creating disclosure document or electronic $13.77 clerical............. 5 68.85 5,000 25,000 344,250
disclosure (including initial, annual,
and opt out disclosures).
$28.37 professional/ 10 283.70 5,000 50,000 1,418,500
technical.
Disseminating initial disclosure $13.77 clerical............. 15 206.55 5,000 75,000 1,032,750
(including opt out notices).
$28.37 professional/ 10 283.70 5,000 50,000 1,418,500
technical.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\*\ Staff calculated labor costs by applying appropriate hourly cost figures to burden hours. The hourly rates used were based on mean wages for
managerial/professional time (e.g., compliance evaluation and/or planning), professional/technical time (e.g., designing and producing notices,
reviewing and updating information systems), and clerical time (e.g., reproduction tasks, filing, and, where applicable to the given event, typing or
mailing). See BLS National Compensation Survey, Table 3, available at https://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncbl0635.pdf. Labor cost totals reflect solely
that of the commercial entities affected. Staff assumes that the time required of consumers to respond affirmatively to respondents' opt-out programs
(be it manually or electronically) would be minimal.
[[Page 11666]]
\**\ Reviewing instructions includes all efforts performed by or for the respondent to: determine whether and to what extent the respondent is covered
by an agency collection of information, understand the nature of the request, and determine the appropriate response (including the creation and
dissemination of document and/or electronic disclosures).
Burden hours and costs for established entities:
Burden for established entities already familiar with the Rule
predictably would be less than for start-up entities because start-up
costs, such as crafting a privacy policy, are generally one-time costs
and have already been incurred. Staff's best estimate of the average
burden for these entities is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approx. number Approx. total
Event Hourly wage and Hours per of Approx. total labor costs
labor category respondent\*\ respondents\**\ annual hours (dollars)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reviewing GLBA-implementing $35.72 4 70,000 280,000 $10,001,600
policies and practices. managerial/
professional.
Disseminating annual $13.77 clerical. 15 70,000 1,050,000 14,458,500
disclosure.
$28.37 5 70,000 350,000 9,929,500
professional/
technical.
Changes to privacy policies $13.77 clerical. 15 1,000 15,000 206,550
and related disclosures.
$28.37 5 1,000 5,000 141,850
professional/
technical.
-----------------
Total.................... ................ .............. ............... 1,700,000 34,738,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\*\ Staff calculated labor costs by applying appropriate hourly cost figures to burden hours. The hourly wage
rates used were based on mean wages for managerial/professional time (e.g., compliance evaluation and/or
planning), skilled professional/technical time (e.g., designing and producing notices, reviewing and updating
information systems), and clerical time (e.g., reproduction tasks, filing, and, where applicable to the given
event, typing or mailing). (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Table 3, July 2003; https://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/
ncbl0635.pdf). Consumers have a continuing right to opt-out, as well as a right to revoke their opt-out at any
time. When a respondent changes its information sharing practices, consumers are again given the opportunity
to opt-out. Again, staff assumes that the time required of consumers to respond affirmatively to respondents'
opt-out programs (be it manually or electronically) would be minimal.
\**\ The estimate of respondents is based on the following assumptions: (1) 100,000 respondents, approximately
70% of whom maintain customer relationships exceeding one year, (2) no more than 1% (1,000) of whom make
additional changes to privacy policies at any time other than the occasion of the annual notice; and (3) such
changes will occur no more often than once per year.
As calculated above, the total annual PRA burden for all affected
entities in a given year would be 2,000,000 hours and $42,544,000.
Estimated Capital/Other Non-Labor Costs Burden: Staff estimates
that the capital or other non-labor costs associated with the document
requests are minimal. Covered entities will already be equipped to
provide written notices (e.g., computers with word processing programs,
typewriters, copying machines, mailing capabilities). Most likely, only
entities that already have on-line capabilities will offer consumers
the choice to receive notices via electronic format. As such, these
entities will already be equipped with the computer equipment and
software necessary to disseminate the required disclosures via
electronic means.
Christian S. White,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 05-4590 Filed 3-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P