Section 610 Review: Fluid Milk Promotion Program, 11535-11536 [05-4581]

Download as PDF 11535 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 70, No. 45 Wednesday, March 9, 2005 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY New Addresses Federal Labor Relations Authority. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Washington and Boston Regional Offices of the Federal Labor Relations Authority are relocating. Accordingly, it is necessary to amend 5 CFR chapter XIV to reflect the changes in the addresses for these offices. DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective March 9, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yvonne Thomas, Director, Administrative Services Division; Federal Labor Relations Authority; 1400 K Street, NW.; Washington, DC 20424– 0001; (202) 218–7750. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Paragraph (d) of Appendix A to 5 CFR chapter XIV sets forth the addresses, telephone numbers, and fax numbers of the Regional Offices of the Federal Labor Relations Authority. Because of the relocation of two of these offices, it is necessary to revise these provisions of the agency’s regulations. The Washington Regional Office will relocate effective March 14, 2005. The Boston Regional Office will relocate effective March 21, 2005. SUMMARY: Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Federal Labor Relations Authority has determined that these regulations, as amended, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, because they apply to Federal employees, Federal agencies, and labor organizations representing Federal employees. 17:19 Mar 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 These regulatory changes will not result in the expenditure by state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 5 CFR Chapter XIV VerDate jul<14>2003 Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 These rules are not major rules as defined by section 804 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. These rules will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and export markets. Dated: March 2, 2005. Yvonne Thomas, Director, Administrative Services Division. [FR Doc. 05–4579 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6727–01–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 1160 [Docket No. DA–04–02] Section 610 Review: Fluid Milk Promotion Program Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Confirmation of regulations. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document summarizes the results of an Agriculture Marketing Service (AMS) review of the Fluid Milk Promotion Program under the criteria contained in Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). Based upon its review, AMS has determined that the Order should be continued without change. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Interested persons may obtain a copy of These regulations contain no the review. Requests for copies should information collection or record keeping be sent to David Jamison, Branch Chief, requirements under the Paperwork Promotion and Research Branch, Dairy Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507 Programs, Stop 0233—Room 2958, 1400 et seq.). Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–0231, (202) 720– CHAPTER XIV—FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY 6967, e-mail: David.Jamison2@usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Fluid I For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 7134, Milk Promotion Act of 1990 (Fluid Milk Act) (7 U.S.C. Section 6401 et seq.), Appendix A to 5 CFR Ch. XIV is authorized the Fluid Milk Promotion amended as follows: Order (Order) (7 CFR part 1160), a I Appendix A to 5 CFR Ch. XIV, national processor program for fluid paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2), are revised milk promotion and education. The to read as follows: program’s objective is to educate Appendix A to 5 CFR Ch. XIV—Current Americans about the benefits of milk, Addresses and Geographic increase fluid milk consumption, and Jurisdictions maintain and expand markets and uses for fluid milk products in the * * * * * contiguous 48 States and the District of (d) * * * Columbia. (1) Boston, Massachusetts Regional The program became effective on Office—10 Causeway Street, Suite 472, December 10, 1993, when the Order was Boston, MA 02222–1043; telephone: issued. Processors marketing more than (617) 424–5730; fax: (617) 424–5743. 3,000,000 pounds of fluid milk per (2) Washington, DC Regional Officemonth, excluding those fluid milk 1400 K Street NW., Suite 200, products delivered to the residence of a Washington, DC 20424–0001; telephone: consumer, fund this program through a (202) 482–6700; fax: (202) 482–6724. 20-cent per hundredweight assessment on fluid milk processed and marketed in * * * * * PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM 09MRR1 11536 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Rules and Regulations consumer-type packages in the contiguous 48 States and the District of Columbia. The Order provides for the establishment of the Fluid Milk Board, which is composed of 20 members appointed by the Secretary of Agriculture. Fifteen members are fluid milk processors who each represent a separate geographical region, and five are at-large members. Of the five at-large members, at least three must be fluid milk processors and at least one must be from the general public. The members of the Fluid Milk Board serve 3-year terms and are eligible to be appointed to two consecutive terms. Currently, there are approximately 100 fluid milk processors subject to the provisions of the Fluid Milk Act. Processors that process less than 3,000,000 pounds of milk per month, excluding those fluid milk products delivered directly to the place of residence of a consumer, are exempt from this program. AMS provides federal oversight of the Fluid Milk Program. A Notice of Review and Request for Written Comments was published in the Federal Register on March 30, 2004, (69 FR 16508). No comments were received. The purpose of the review is to determine whether the Order should be continued without change, amended, or rescinded (consistent with the objectives of the RFA) to minimize the impacts on small entities. In conducting this review, AMS considered the following factors: (1) The continued need for the Fluid Milk Promotion Order (Order); (2) the nature of complaints or comments received from the public concerning the Order; (3) the complexity of the Order; (4) the extent to which the Order overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal rules, and, to the extent feasible, with State and local governmental rules; and (5) the length of time since the Order has been evaluated or the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changes in the area affected by the Order. The Order is not unduly complex, and AMS has not identified regulations that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the Order. Over the years, changes to the regulations of the Order have been made to reflect current industry operating practices and to solve current industry problems to the extent possible. The Order is independently evaluated every year to determine the effectiveness of its programs and the results are reported annually to Congress. The Department has not received any complaints or comments from the public regarding the VerDate jul<14>2003 17:19 Mar 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 Fluid Milk Act, Order, or the regulations issued under the Order. Based upon the review, AMS has determined that the Order should be continued without change. AMS plans to continue working with the dairy industry in maintaining an effective program. Dated: March 4, 2005. Kenneth C. Clayton, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 05–4581 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. 2003–NE–28–AD; Amendment 39–13994; AD 2005–05–06] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc Models RB211 Trent 768–60, Trent 772–60, and Trent 772B–60 Turbofan Engines Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for Rolls-Royce plc (RR) models RB211 Trent 768–60, Trent 772–60, and Trent 772–60 turbofan engines. That AD currently requires initial and repetitive surge margin testing of engines. This AD requires the same actions but at updated intervals. This AD also requires installation of updated software for the engine electronic controllers (EECs), and adds a terminating action for the surge margin testing requirement. This AD supersedure results from RR requiring EEC software to be revised, and extending the repetitive interval for surge margin testing for engines that have incorporated the software update for the EECs. This AD also results from RR introducing a stage 1 high pressure (HP) compressor casing and intermediate case outer location ring with wear-resistant coating, to reduce wear to prevent reduction in surge margin. We are issuing this AD to prevent a possible dual-engine in-flight surge, which could result in dual engine power loss. DATES: Effective March 24, 2005. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations as of March 24, 2005. PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 We must receive any comments on this AD by May 9, 2005. ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on this AD: • By mail: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2003–NE– 28–AD, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803–5299. • By fax: (781) 238–7055. • By e-mail: 9-aneadcomment@faa.gov. You can get the service information referenced in this AD from Rolls-Royce plc, PO Box 31, Derby, England, DE248BJ; telephone: 011–44–1332– 242424; fax; 011–44–1332–245–418. You may examine the AD docket, by appointment, at the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Spinney, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803–5299; telephone (781) 238–7175; fax (781) 238–7199. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 24, 2003, the FAA issued AD 2003–15– 09, Amendment 39–13252 (68 FR 46444, August 6, 2003). That AD requires initial and repetitive surge margin testing of RR models RB211 Trent 768–60, Trent 772–60, and Trent 772B–60 turbofan engines. That AD resulted from several reports of low power surges. That condition, if not corrected, could result in a possible dual-engine in-flight surge, which could result in loss of control of the airplane. Actions Since AD 2003–15–09 Was Issued Since that AD was issued, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), which is the airworthiness authority for the United Kingdom (U.K.), recently notified us of related actions taken by the manufacturer to improve the engine surge margin. RR has extended the repetitive interval for surge margin testing for engines that have incorporated a certain software revision for the EECs. RR has also introduced a stage 1 HP compressor casing and intermediate case outer location ring with wear-resistant coating. This coating will prevent axial movement of components during operation, preventing wear resulting in increased rotor tip clearance and reduced surge margin. This AD requires initial and repetitive surge margin testing of engines. This AD also requires revised E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM 09MRR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 9, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11535-11536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4581]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 1160

[Docket No. DA-04-02]


Section 610 Review: Fluid Milk Promotion Program

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Confirmation of regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document summarizes the results of an Agriculture 
Marketing Service (AMS) review of the Fluid Milk Promotion Program 
under the criteria contained in Section 610 of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (RFA). Based upon its review, AMS has determined that 
the Order should be continued without change.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Interested persons may obtain a copy 
of the review. Requests for copies should be sent to David Jamison, 
Branch Chief, Promotion and Research Branch, Dairy Programs, Stop 
0233--Room 2958, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-
0231, (202) 720-6967, e-mail: David.Jamison2@usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Fluid Milk Promotion Act of 1990 (Fluid 
Milk Act) (7 U.S.C. Section 6401 et seq.), authorized the Fluid Milk 
Promotion Order (Order) (7 CFR part 1160), a national processor program 
for fluid milk promotion and education. The program's objective is to 
educate Americans about the benefits of milk, increase fluid milk 
consumption, and maintain and expand markets and uses for fluid milk 
products in the contiguous 48 States and the District of Columbia.
    The program became effective on December 10, 1993, when the Order 
was issued. Processors marketing more than 3,000,000 pounds of fluid 
milk per month, excluding those fluid milk products delivered to the 
residence of a consumer, fund this program through a 20-cent per 
hundredweight assessment on fluid milk processed and marketed in

[[Page 11536]]

consumer-type packages in the contiguous 48 States and the District of 
Columbia.
    The Order provides for the establishment of the Fluid Milk Board, 
which is composed of 20 members appointed by the Secretary of 
Agriculture. Fifteen members are fluid milk processors who each 
represent a separate geographical region, and five are at-large 
members. Of the five at-large members, at least three must be fluid 
milk processors and at least one must be from the general public. The 
members of the Fluid Milk Board serve 3-year terms and are eligible to 
be appointed to two consecutive terms.
    Currently, there are approximately 100 fluid milk processors 
subject to the provisions of the Fluid Milk Act. Processors that 
process less than 3,000,000 pounds of milk per month, excluding those 
fluid milk products delivered directly to the place of residence of a 
consumer, are exempt from this program. AMS provides federal oversight 
of the Fluid Milk Program.
    A Notice of Review and Request for Written Comments was published 
in the Federal Register on March 30, 2004, (69 FR 16508). No comments 
were received.
    The purpose of the review is to determine whether the Order should 
be continued without change, amended, or rescinded (consistent with the 
objectives of the RFA) to minimize the impacts on small entities. In 
conducting this review, AMS considered the following factors: (1) The 
continued need for the Fluid Milk Promotion Order (Order); (2) the 
nature of complaints or comments received from the public concerning 
the Order; (3) the complexity of the Order; (4) the extent to which the 
Order overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal rules, and, 
to the extent feasible, with State and local governmental rules; and 
(5) the length of time since the Order has been evaluated or the degree 
to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changes 
in the area affected by the Order.
    The Order is not unduly complex, and AMS has not identified 
regulations that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the Order. Over 
the years, changes to the regulations of the Order have been made to 
reflect current industry operating practices and to solve current 
industry problems to the extent possible. The Order is independently 
evaluated every year to determine the effectiveness of its programs and 
the results are reported annually to Congress. The Department has not 
received any complaints or comments from the public regarding the Fluid 
Milk Act, Order, or the regulations issued under the Order.
    Based upon the review, AMS has determined that the Order should be 
continued without change. AMS plans to continue working with the dairy 
industry in maintaining an effective program.

    Dated: March 4, 2005.
Kenneth C. Clayton,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 05-4581 Filed 3-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.