Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 11607-11608 [05-4575]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
Agency Approval Number: 0607–
0810.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Burden: 1,917,410 hours.
Number of Respondents: 3,122,900.
Avg Hours Per Response: Households:
initial survey—38 minutes;
reinterview—10 minutes. GQ Contacts:
initial contact—25 minutes;
reinterview—10 minutes. GQ persons:
15 minutes.
Needs and Uses: The U.S. Census
Bureau requests authorization from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) to continue conducting the
American Community Survey. The
Census Bureau has developed a
methodology to collect and update
every year demographic, social,
economic, and housing data that are
essentially the same as the ‘‘long-form’’
data that the Census Bureau
traditionally has collected once a
decade as part of the decennial census.
The American Community Survey is the
information collection tool enabling this
continuous measurement methodology.
Federal and State government agencies
use such data to evaluate and manage
Federal programs and to distribute
funding for various programs which
include food stamps, transportation
dollars, and housing grants. State,
county, and community governments,
nonprofit organizations, businesses, and
the general public use information like
housing quality, income distribution,
journey-to-work patterns, immigration
data, and regional age distributions for
decision making and program
evaluation.
In January 2005, the Census Bureau
began full implementation of the
American Community Survey. The
American Community Survey will have
an annual sample of nearly 3 million
households. In addition, we will select
approximately 3,000 residential
addresses per month in Puerto Rico and
refer to the survey as the Puerto Rico
Community Survey.
Using the Master Address File (MAF)
from the decennial census that is
updated each year, we will mail survey
forms each month to a new group of
potential households, use reverse lookup directories to obtain telephone
numbers of households which have not
responded, and attempt to conduct
interviews over the telephone. Upon
completion of the telephone follow-up,
we will select a subsample of the
remaining households which have not
responded, typically at a rate of one in
three, to designate a household for a
personal interview. Collecting these
data from a new sample of households
every month will not only provide more
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:06 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
timely data but will lessen respondent
burden in the decennial census.
We will continue to use the trimodal
data collection operation already in
place. We will attempt to collect data by
mailing the ACS–1(2005) to the sample
households. Households requiring a
survey form in Spanish can request form
ACS–1(2005)(SP). For Puerto Rico
households, we will mail the ACS–
1(2005)PR(SP). An English form ACS–
1(2005)PR can also be requested. We
will use computer-assisted telephone
interviewing (CATI) to conduct
telephone interviews for all households
that do not respond by mail and for
which we are able to obtain telephone
numbers. We will use computer-assisted
personal interviewing (CAPI) to conduct
personal interviews for a sample of
addresses for which we do not have a
mail or CATI interview.
In addition to selecting a sample of
residential addresses, we will select a
sample of group quarters (GQs). Starting
in January 2006, field representatives
(FRs) will use the ACS–290(PT) to select
a sample of people to interview within
the GQs.
We will also conduct a reinterview
operation to monitor the performance of
FRs. Only households that provide an
interview via CAPI are eligible for
reinterview. A reinterview operation
will also be undertaken for the Group
Quarters contacts.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; business or other for-profit;
not-for-profit institutions; Federal
government; State, local or tribal
government.
Frequency: The American Community
Survey is conducted in a new sample of
households every month.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.
Sections 141, 193, and 221.
OMB Desk Officer: Susan Schechter,
(202) 395–5103.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dhynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to Susan Schechter, OMB Desk
Officer either by fax (202–395–7245) or
e-mail (susan_schechter@omb.eop.gov).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11607
Dated: March 4, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–4574 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
DOC has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance the following proposal for
collection of information under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
Title: Pollution Abatement Costs &
Expenditures Survey.
Form Number(s): MA–200S, MA–
200P, MA–200.
Agency Approval Number: 0607–
0176.
Type of Request: Reinstatement, with
change, of an expired collection.
Burden: 120,000 hours.
Number of Respondents: 62,000.
Avg Hours Per Response: Screener—
15 minutes; Pilot & Survey—5 hours.
Needs and Uses: The Pollution
Abatement Costs and Expenditures
(PACE) survey was conducted annually
from 1973 through 1994, with the
exception of 1987, and again in 1999.
The PACE survey provided measures of
the cost to private industry for the
Nation’s commitment to protecting the
environment. Private industry is
spending significant amounts of money
to meet increasing Federal, state, and
local regulations for controlling
pollution. Efforts to abate pollution or
decrease expenses of pollution
abatement have led to technology
innovation and improved efficiency for
some companies. This survey was a
source of data for monitoring the impact
of environmental programs on the U.S.
economy and responsiveness to these
programs. The absence of the data over
the past 5 years has highlighted the
need for measures of private industry
spending on pollution abatement
activities. During this time, there has
been no suitable substitute for
measuring and monitoring these
environmental changes. In particular,
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has had insufficient information
to monitor the impact of environmental
programs. These data will enable EPA to
better satisfy legislative and executive
requirements to track costs.
With support from the EPA, the
Census Bureau plans to reinstate this
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
11608
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 9, 2005 / Notices
survey for 2005. As a precursor to the
2005 PACE survey, the Census Bureau
also plans to conduct a screener and
pilot survey.
The screener is designed to identify
establishments with PACE activities and
target these establishments for the pilot
and 2005 PACE survey. The screener
will ask respondents if they have
operating costs or capital expenditures
related to the treatment or prevention of
air, water or solid waste pollutants. And
if so, how much (within ranges). These
questions will be check boxes only. The
screener will include approximately
40,000 establishments.
The purpose of the pilot is to test the
proposed 2005 PACE questionnaire with
potential respondents who have
expenses related to treatment or
prevention of pollutants. Respondents
will be asked to complete the form and
answer some qualitative questions on
the content and clarity of instructions.
The pilot results will be used to modify
and finalize the proposed 2005 PACE
questionnaire and sample design. The
pilot and the survey will collect
information similar to that previously
collected on the MA–200: pollution
abatement capital expenditures and
operating costs, each by media (air,
water, solid waste, and multi-media). It
will also collect information on
depreciation and cost offsets. For the
pilot, we will also collect employment
and shipments. The final survey will
only collect these data from non-ASM
establishments. The pilot will include
approximately 2,000 establishments. No
estimates will be produced from the
pilot. The survey will include
approximately 20,000 establishments.
The survey results will be published
in the Current Industrial Reports Series.
Primary users of the pollution
abatement data are Federal, state, and
local government agencies, business
firms, trade associations, academic
researchers, environmental groups, and
private research and consulting
organizations.
The PACE survey results will be used
by EPA to satisfy Executive Order 12866
which specifically charges EPA to assess
the costs and benefits of all proposed
major rules and alternative approaches.
EPA also uses the PACE data in various
reports including: Cost of a Clean
Environment; Section 812 Clean Air
Retrospective Cost Analysis; Annual
OMB Reports to Congress on Costs and
Benefits of Federal Regulation
(Thompson Report); and Social Cost
Appendix of EPA’s Strategic Plan.
Capital expenditures for pollution
abatement is an important component of
total capital expenditures when
analyzing investment and productivity
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:06 Mar 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
at the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the
Bureau of Economic Analysis.
State and local governments, trade
associations, the academic community,
and private businesses use the data to
evaluate regional pollution abatement
spending, local legislation, and
performance of specific industries.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. 131,
182, 193, 224, and 225.
OMB Desk Officer: Susan Schechter,
(202) 395–5103.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dhynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to Susan Schechter, OMB Desk
Officer either by fax (202–395–7245) or
e-mail (susan_schechter@omb.eop.gov).
Dated: March 4, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–4575 Filed 3–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Survey of Income and Program
Participation (SIPP) Wave 6 of the 2004
Panel
ACTION:
Proposed collection; comment
request.
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other federal agencies to take
this opportunity to comment on
proposed or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before May 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at DHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Patrick J. Benton, Census
Bureau, FOB 3, Room 3387,
Washington, DC 20233–8400, (301) 763–
4618.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Census Bureau conducts the SIPP
which is a household-based survey
designed as a continuous series of
national panels. New panels are
introduced every few years with each
panel usually having durations of one to
four years. Respondents are interviewed
at 4-month intervals or ‘‘waves’’ over
the life of the panel. The survey is
molded around a central ‘‘core’’ of labor
force and income questions that remain
fixed throughout the life of the panel.
The core is supplemented with
questions designed to address specific
needs, such as obtaining information on
assets and liabilities, as well as
expenses related to work, health care,
and child support. These supplemental
questions are included with the core
and are referred to as ‘‘topical
modules.’’
The SIPP represents a source of
information for a wide variety of topics
and allows information for separate
topics to be integrated to form a single,
unified database so that the interaction
between tax, transfer, and other
government and private policies can be
examined. Government domestic-policy
formulators depend heavily upon the
SIPP information concerning the
distribution of income received directly
as money or indirectly as in-kind
benefits and the effect of tax and
transfer programs on this distribution.
They also need improved and expanded
data on the income and general
economic and financial situation of the
U.S. population. The SIPP has provided
these kinds of data on a continuing basis
since 1983 permitting levels of
economic well-being and changes in
these levels to be measured over time.
The 2004 Panel is currently scheduled
for 4 years and will include 12 waves
of interviewing, which began in
February 2004. Approximately 62,000
households were selected for the 2004
Panel, of which, 46,500 are expected to
be interviewed. We estimate that each
household will contain 2.1 people 15
years of age or older, yielding 97,650
interviews in Wave 1 and subsequent
waves. Interviews take 30 minutes on
average. Three waves of interviewing
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11607-11608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4575]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
Title: Pollution Abatement Costs & Expenditures Survey.
Form Number(s): MA-200S, MA-200P, MA-200.
Agency Approval Number: 0607-0176.
Type of Request: Reinstatement, with change, of an expired
collection.
Burden: 120,000 hours.
Number of Respondents: 62,000.
Avg Hours Per Response: Screener--15 minutes; Pilot & Survey--5
hours.
Needs and Uses: The Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures
(PACE) survey was conducted annually from 1973 through 1994, with the
exception of 1987, and again in 1999. The PACE survey provided measures
of the cost to private industry for the Nation's commitment to
protecting the environment. Private industry is spending significant
amounts of money to meet increasing Federal, state, and local
regulations for controlling pollution. Efforts to abate pollution or
decrease expenses of pollution abatement have led to technology
innovation and improved efficiency for some companies. This survey was
a source of data for monitoring the impact of environmental programs on
the U.S. economy and responsiveness to these programs. The absence of
the data over the past 5 years has highlighted the need for measures of
private industry spending on pollution abatement activities. During
this time, there has been no suitable substitute for measuring and
monitoring these environmental changes. In particular, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has had insufficient information
to monitor the impact of environmental programs. These data will enable
EPA to better satisfy legislative and executive requirements to track
costs.
With support from the EPA, the Census Bureau plans to reinstate
this
[[Page 11608]]
survey for 2005. As a precursor to the 2005 PACE survey, the Census
Bureau also plans to conduct a screener and pilot survey.
The screener is designed to identify establishments with PACE
activities and target these establishments for the pilot and 2005 PACE
survey. The screener will ask respondents if they have operating costs
or capital expenditures related to the treatment or prevention of air,
water or solid waste pollutants. And if so, how much (within ranges).
These questions will be check boxes only. The screener will include
approximately 40,000 establishments.
The purpose of the pilot is to test the proposed 2005 PACE
questionnaire with potential respondents who have expenses related to
treatment or prevention of pollutants. Respondents will be asked to
complete the form and answer some qualitative questions on the content
and clarity of instructions. The pilot results will be used to modify
and finalize the proposed 2005 PACE questionnaire and sample design.
The pilot and the survey will collect information similar to that
previously collected on the MA-200: pollution abatement capital
expenditures and operating costs, each by media (air, water, solid
waste, and multi-media). It will also collect information on
depreciation and cost offsets. For the pilot, we will also collect
employment and shipments. The final survey will only collect these data
from non-ASM establishments. The pilot will include approximately 2,000
establishments. No estimates will be produced from the pilot. The
survey will include approximately 20,000 establishments.
The survey results will be published in the Current Industrial
Reports Series. Primary users of the pollution abatement data are
Federal, state, and local government agencies, business firms, trade
associations, academic researchers, environmental groups, and private
research and consulting organizations.
The PACE survey results will be used by EPA to satisfy Executive
Order 12866 which specifically charges EPA to assess the costs and
benefits of all proposed major rules and alternative approaches. EPA
also uses the PACE data in various reports including: Cost of a Clean
Environment; Section 812 Clean Air Retrospective Cost Analysis; Annual
OMB Reports to Congress on Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulation
(Thompson Report); and Social Cost Appendix of EPA's Strategic Plan.
Capital expenditures for pollution abatement is an important
component of total capital expenditures when analyzing investment and
productivity at the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of
Economic Analysis.
State and local governments, trade associations, the academic
community, and private businesses use the data to evaluate regional
pollution abatement spending, local legislation, and performance of
specific industries.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. 131, 182, 193, 224, and 225.
OMB Desk Officer: Susan Schechter, (202) 395-5103.
Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dhynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
to Susan Schechter, OMB Desk Officer either by fax (202-395-7245) or e-
mail (susan_schechter@omb.eop.gov).
Dated: March 4, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-4575 Filed 3-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P