Proposed Realignment of the Santa Lucia Highlands and Arroyo Seco Viticultural Areas (2003R-083P); Comment Period Extension, 11178-11179 [05-4483]

Download as PDF 11178 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules Roads in the southeast corner of section 28, T9N, R13W (Plantation Quadrangle); then (3) Continues west on Kruse Ranch Road about 0.2 mile to its intersection with the 920-foot elevation line, T9N, R13W (Plantation Quadrangle); then (4) Proceeds northerly then easterly along the 920-foot elevation line about 2.2 miles to its intersection with Hauser Bridge Road, section 27, T9N, R13W (Plantation Quadrangle); then (5) Proceeds east on Hauser Bridge Road about 1.5 miles to its intersection with the 920-foot elevation line, section 23, T9N, R13W (Plantation Quadrangle); then (6) Proceeds northwesterly then easterly along the 920-foot elevation line about 7.8 miles to its intersection with an unnamed, unimproved road that forks to the south from Tin Barn Road, section 8, T9N, R13W (Annapolis Quadrangle); then (7) Proceeds east then north along the unnamed, unimproved road to its intersection with Tin Barn Road, section 8, T9N, R13W (Annapolis Quadrangle); then (8) Proceeds east in a straight line about 1.55 miles to the line’s intersection with Haupt Creek, section 10, T9N, R13W (Annapolis Quadrangle); then (9) Follows Haupt Creek southeasterly about 1.2 miles to its junction with the western boundary of section 11, T9N, R13W (Annapolis Quadrangle); then (10) Proceeds straight north along the western boundary of section 11 about 0.9 mile to the northwest corner of section 11 (near Buck Spring), T9N, R13W (Annapolis Quadrangle); then (11) Proceeds 1.1 miles straight east along the northern boundary of section 11 and then section 12 to the section line’s intersection with an unnamed, unimproved road along Skyline Ridge, section 12, T9N, R13W (Annapolis Quadrangle); (12) Follows the unnamed, unimproved road southeast about 1.3 miles to the road’s intersection with the 1,200-foot elevation line, section 13, T9N, R13W (Tombs Creek Quadrangle); then (13) Proceeds southeasterly along the 1,200-foot elevation line about 0.6 mile its intersection with Allen Creek, section 18, T9N, R12W (Tombs Creek Quadrangle); then (14) Follows Allen Creek north about 0.2 mile to its intersection with the 920foot elevation line, section 18, T9N, R12W (Tombs Creek Quadrangle); then (15) Proceeds easterly and then southeasterly along the meandering 920foot elevation line to its intersection with Jim Creek, south of a 1,200-foot VerDate jul<14>2003 13:31 Mar 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 plateau named The Island, section 21, T9N, R12W (Fort Ross Quadrangle); then (16) Follows Jim Creek southeast about 0.7 mile to its intersection with the northern boundary of section 27, T9N, R12W (Fort Ross Quadrangle); then (17) Proceeds along the northern boundary of section 27, T9N, R12W, to the northeast corner of that section (Fort Ross Quadrangle); then (18) Proceeds south along the eastern boundaries of sections 27 and 34, T9N, R12W, and continues south along the eastern boundaries of sections 3, 10, 15, and 22, T8N, R12W, to the intersection of the eastern boundary of section 22 and Fort Ross Road (Fort Ross Quadrangle); then (19) Proceeds east a short distance on Fort Ross Road to the road’s intersection with the Middle Branch of Russian Gulch Creek, and then follows the creek south for about 1.2 miles to the creek’s intersection with the 920-foot elevation line, east-southeast of the Black Mountain Conservation Camp, section 26, T8N, R12W (Fort Ross Quadrangle); then (20) Proceeds southerly along the meandering 920-foot elevation line about 8.1 miles, passing between the Fort Ross and Arched Rock maps as the 920-foot elevation line meanders north then south around the West Branch of Russian Gulch, and returns to the beginning point at Meyers Grade Road, T8N, R12W (Arched Rock Quadrangle). Dated: February 20, 2005. John J. Manfreda, Administrator. [FR Doc. 05–4390 Filed 3–7–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810–31–P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 27 CFR Part 9 [Notice No. 35; Re: Notice No. 29] RIN 1513–AA72 Proposed Realignment of the Santa Lucia Highlands and Arroyo Seco Viticultural Areas (2003R–083P); Comment Period Extension Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; comment period extension. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In response to an industry request, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau extends the comment PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 period for Notice No. 29, Proposed Realignment of the Santa Lucia Highlands and Arroyo Seco Viticultural Areas, a notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on January 25, 2005, for an additional 60 days. DATES: We must receive written comments regarding Notice No. 29 on or before May 25, 2005. ADDRESSES: You may send comments to any of the following addresses: • Chief, Regulations and Procedures Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Attn: Notice No. 29, P.O. Box 14412, Washington, DC 20044– 4412. • (202) 927–8525 (facsimile). • nprm@ttb.gov (e-mail). • https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/ index.htm. An online comment form is posted with this notice on our Web site. • https://www.regulations.gov (Federal e-rulemaking portal; follow instructions for submitting comments). You may view copies of this extension notice, Notice No. 29, the petition, the appropriate maps, and any comments we receive on Notice No. 29 by appointment at the TTB Library, 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220. To make an appointment, call (202) 927–2400. You may also access copies of this extension notice, Notice No. 29, and the related comments online at https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/ index.htm. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: N.A. Sutton, Program Manager, Regulations and Procedures Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 925 Lakeville St., #158, Petaluma, CA 94952; telephone (415) 271–1254. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Paul Thorpe, on behalf of E.&J. Gallo Winery, submitted a petition to TTB requesting the realignment of a portion of the common boundary between the established Santa Lucia Highlands viticultural area (27 CFR 9.139) and the established Arroyo Seco viticultural area (27 CFR 9.59). Both viticultural areas are within the Monterey viticultural area (27 CFR 9.98) in Monterey County, California, which is in turn within the larger multi-county Central Coast viticultural area (27 CFR 9.75). The proposed realignment would transfer about 200 acres from the Arroyo Seco viticultural area to the Santa Lucia Highlands area. In Notice No. 29, published in the Federal Register (70 FR 3333) on Monday, January 24, 2005, we described the petitioner’s reasons for the proposed realignment and requested comments on that proposal on or before March 25, 2005. E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules On February 11, 2005, we received a request from Pete Downs of KendallJackson Winery to extend the comment period for Notice No. 29. Mr. Downs requested the extension in order to study the proposal in greater depth. In response to this request, we extend the comment period for Notice No. 29 an additional 60 days from the original closing date. Therefore, comments on Notice No. 29 are now due on or before May 25, 2005. Drafting Information Nancy Sutton of the Regulations and Procedures Division drafted this notice. List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9 Wine. Authority and Issuance This notice is issued under the authority in 27 U.S.C. 205. You can inspect a copy of the submitted rule revision and EPA’s technical support document (TSD) at our Region IX office during normal business hours. You may also see a copy of the submitted rule revision and TSD at the following locations: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (Mail Code 6102T), Room B–102, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule Evaluation Section, 1001 ‘‘I’’ Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Kern County Air Pollution Control District, 2700 ‘‘M’’ Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, CA 93301. A copy of the rule may also be available via the Internet at https:// www.arb.ca.gov/drdb/drdbltxt.htm. Please be advised that this is not an EPA Web site and may not contain the same version of the rule that was submitted to EPA. Signed: February 25, 2005. John J. Manfreda, Administrator. [FR Doc. 05–4483 Filed 3–7–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810–31–P 40 CFR Part 52 Al Petersen, Rulemaking Office (AIR–4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 947–4118, petersen.alfred@epa.gov. [CA 311–0471b; FRL–7878–4] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Kern County Air Pollution Control District Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Kern County Air Pollution Control District (KCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revisions concern the emission of particulate matter (PM–10) from wood combustion and the recision of a rule exempting wet plumes from opacity measurement. We are proposing approval of a local rule and a recision of a rule that administer regulations and regulate emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by April 7, 2005. ADDRESSES: Mail or e-mail comments to Andy Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR–4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, or email to steckel.andrew@epa.gov, or submit comments at https:// www.regulations.gov. VerDate jul<14>2003 13:31 Mar 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 This proposal addresses the approval of local KCAPCD Rule 416.1 and recision of Rule 403. In the Rules section of this Federal Register, we are approving this local rule and rule recision in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further information, please see the direct final action. Dated: February 8, 2005. Karen Schwinn, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 05–4341 Filed 3–7–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 11179 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [WA–01–003; FRL–7881–9] Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of Washington; Spokane Carbon Monoxide Attainment Plan Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The EPA invites public comment on its proposal to approve Washington State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted to EPA by the State of Washington on September 20, 2001, September 26, 2001 and November 22, 2004. The revisions consist of changes to the State of Washington Inspection and Maintenance Program and a Plan for attaining carbon monoxide (CO) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in the Spokane Serious CO Nonattainment Area. The EPA also invites public comment on its proposal to approve certain source-specific SIP revisions relating to Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation. Written comments must be received by April 7, 2005. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. WA–01– 003, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. • E-mail: R10aircom@epa.gov. • Fax: (206)–553–0110. • Mail: Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail code: OAWT–107, 1200 Sixth Ave., Seattle, Washington 98101. • Hand Delivery: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics, OAWT–107, 9th Floor, 1200 Sixth Ave., Seattle, Washington 98101. Such deliveries are only accepted during normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. WA–01–003. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise DATES: E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 8, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11178-11179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau

27 CFR Part 9

[Notice No. 35; Re: Notice No. 29]
RIN 1513-AA72


Proposed Realignment of the Santa Lucia Highlands and Arroyo Seco 
Viticultural Areas (2003R-083P); Comment Period Extension

AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; comment period extension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In response to an industry request, the Alcohol and Tobacco 
Tax and Trade Bureau extends the comment period for Notice No. 29, 
Proposed Realignment of the Santa Lucia Highlands and Arroyo Seco 
Viticultural Areas, a notice of proposed rulemaking published in the 
Federal Register on January 25, 2005, for an additional 60 days.

DATES: We must receive written comments regarding Notice No. 29 on or 
before May 25, 2005.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments to any of the following addresses:
     Chief, Regulations and Procedures Division, Alcohol and 
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Attn: Notice No. 29, P.O. Box 14412, 
Washington, DC 20044-4412.
     (202) 927-8525 (facsimile).
     nprm@ttb.gov (e-mail).
     https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm. An online 
comment form is posted with this notice on our Web site.
     https://www.regulations.gov (Federal e-rulemaking portal; 
follow instructions for submitting comments).
    You may view copies of this extension notice, Notice No. 29, the 
petition, the appropriate maps, and any comments we receive on Notice 
No. 29 by appointment at the TTB Library, 1310 G Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20220. To make an appointment, call (202) 927-2400. You 
may also access copies of this extension notice, Notice No. 29, and the 
related comments online at https://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: N.A. Sutton, Program Manager, 
Regulations and Procedures Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 
Bureau, 925 Lakeville St., 158, Petaluma, CA 94952; telephone 
(415) 271-1254.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Paul Thorpe, on behalf of E.&J. Gallo 
Winery, submitted a petition to TTB requesting the realignment of a 
portion of the common boundary between the established Santa Lucia 
Highlands viticultural area (27 CFR 9.139) and the established Arroyo 
Seco viticultural area (27 CFR 9.59). Both viticultural areas are 
within the Monterey viticultural area (27 CFR 9.98) in Monterey County, 
California, which is in turn within the larger multi-county Central 
Coast viticultural area (27 CFR 9.75). The proposed realignment would 
transfer about 200 acres from the Arroyo Seco viticultural area to the 
Santa Lucia Highlands area.
    In Notice No. 29, published in the Federal Register (70 FR 3333) on 
Monday, January 24, 2005, we described the petitioner's reasons for the 
proposed realignment and requested comments on that proposal on or 
before March 25, 2005.

[[Page 11179]]

    On February 11, 2005, we received a request from Pete Downs of 
Kendall-Jackson Winery to extend the comment period for Notice No. 29. 
Mr. Downs requested the extension in order to study the proposal in 
greater depth.
    In response to this request, we extend the comment period for 
Notice No. 29 an additional 60 days from the original closing date. 
Therefore, comments on Notice No. 29 are now due on or before May 25, 
2005.

Drafting Information

    Nancy Sutton of the Regulations and Procedures Division drafted 
this notice.

List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9

    Wine.

Authority and Issuance

    This notice is issued under the authority in 27 U.S.C. 205.

    Signed: February 25, 2005.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-4483 Filed 3-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.