Receipt of an Application for an Incidental Take Permit for the development of the Shadow Wood Subdivision in Brevard County, Fl, 11260-11261 [05-4427]
Download as PDF
11260
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Notices
Permit No. TE–055419
Applicant: Turner Biological
Consulting, Tuscola, Texas.
Applicant requests an amendment to
an existing permit to allow presence/
absence surveys for the following
species within New Mexico, Oklahoma,
and Texas: jaguar (Panthera onca),
Mexican long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris
nivalis), Attwater’s greater prairiechicken (Tympanuchus cupido
attwateri), black-capped Vireo (Vireo
atricapilla), brown pelican (Pelecanus
occidentalis), golden-cheeked warbler
(Dendroica chrysoparia), interior least
tern (Sterna antillarum), northern
aplomado falcon (Falco femoralis
septentrionalis), piping plover
(Charadrius melodus), red-cockaded
woodpecker (Picoides borealis),
southwestern willow flycatcher
(Empidonax traillii extimus), whooping
crane (Grus Americana), Big Bend
gambusia (Gambusia gaigei), Clear
Creek gambusia (Gambusia heterochir),
Comanche Springs pupfish (Cyprinodon
elegans), Leon Springs pupfish
(Cyprinodon bovinus), Pecos gambusia
(Gambusia nobilis), and San Marcos
gambusia (Gambusia georgei).
Additionally, applicant requests
authorization to survey for and collect
the following species within New
Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas:
Ancistrocactus tobuschii (Tobush
fishhook cactus), Astrophytum asterias
(star cactus), Callirhoe scabriuscula
(Texas poppy mallow), Coryphantha
minima (Nellie cory cactus),
Coryphantha ramillosa (bunched cory
cactus), Coryphantha sneedii var.
sneedii (Sneed pincushion cactus),
Cryptantha crassipes (Terlingua Creek
cat’s eye), Echinocereus chisoensis var.
chisoensis (Chisos Mountain hedgehog
cactus), Echinocereus reichenbachii var.
albertii (black lace cactus), Echinocereus
viridiflorus var. davisii (Davis green
pitaya), Echinomastus mariposensis
(Lloyd’s Mariposa cactus), Helianthus
paradoxus (Pecos sunflower), Quercus
hinkleyi (Hinkley oak), and Zizania
texana (Texas wild-rice).
Permit No. TE–835139
Applicant: Hawks Aloft, Albuquerque,
New Mexico.
Applicant requests an amendment to
an existing permit to allow presence/
absence surveys and nest monitoring
activities for southwestern willow
flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus)
within New Mexico.
Permit No. TE–100579
Applicant: Salt River Project
Agricultural Improvement and Power
District, Tempe, Arizona.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:54 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
Applicant requests a new permit for
research and recovery purposes to
conduct habitat manipulation and
monitoring, presence/absence surveys,
nest searches, and nest monitoring for
the southwestern willow flycatcher
(Empidonax traillii extimus) within
Arizona.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.
Dated: February 18, 2005.
Joy E. Nicholopoulos,
Acting Assistant Regional Director, Ecological
Services, Region 2, Albuquerque, New
Mexico.
[FR Doc. 05–4443 Filed 3–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Receipt of an Application for an
Incidental Take Permit for the
development of the Shadow Wood
Subdivision in Brevard County, Fl
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: John Massaro (Applicant)
requests an incidental take permit (ITP)
pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C.
1531 et seq.), as amended (Act). The
Applicant anticipates take of the Florida
scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens)
and eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon
corais couperi) incidental to
construction of a mixed residential and
commercial use subdivision with
supporting infrastructure in Brevard
County, Florida. Construction and its
associated infrastructure would destroy
about 9.67 acres of foraging, sheltering,
and possibly nesting habitat for the
scrub-jay that is also possibly used by
the indigo snake. A more detailed
description of the mitigation and
minimization measures to address the
effects of the Project to the protected
species are outlined in the Applicant’s
Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), the
Service’s Environmental Assessment
(EA), and in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section below.
The Service also announces the
availability of the EA and HCP for the
incidental take application. Copies of
the EA and/or HCP may be obtained by
making a request to the Regional Office
(see ADDRESSES). Requests must be in
writing to be processed. This notice also
advises the public that the Service has
made a preliminary determination that
issuing the ITP is not a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment within the
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
meaning of Section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), as amended. The Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is
based on information contained in the
EA and HCP. The final determination
will be made no sooner than 60 days
from the date of this notice. This notice
is provided pursuant to Section 10 of
the Act and NEPA regulations (40 CFR
1506.6).
DATES: Written comments on the ITP
application, EA, and HCP should be
sent to the Service’s Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES) and should be received on
or before May 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review
the application and HCP may obtain a
copy by writing the Service’s Southeast
Regional Office, Atlanta, Georgia. Please
reference permit number TE089883–0 in
such requests. Documents will also be
available for public inspection by
appointment during normal business
hours at the Regional Office, 1875
Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta,
Georgia 30345 (Attn: Endangered
Species Permits), or Field Supervisor,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 6620
Southpoint Drive South, Suite 310,
Jacksonville, Florida 32216.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David Dell, Regional HCP Coordinator,
(see ADDRESSES above), telephone: 404/
679–7313, facsimile: 404/679–7081; or
Mr. Michael Jennings, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, Jacksonville Field Office,
Jacksonville, Florida (see ADDRESSES
above), telephone: 904/232–2580, ext.
113.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you
wish to comment, you may submit
comments by any one of several
methods. Please reference permit
number TE089883–0 in such comments.
You may mail comments to the
Service’s Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES). You may also comment via
the internet to david_dell@fws.gov.
Please submit comments over the
internet as an ASCII file avoiding the
use of special characters and any form
of encryption. Please also include your
name and return address in your
internet message. If you do not receive
a confirmation from us that we have
received your internet message, contact
us directly at either telephone number
listed below (see FURTHER INFORMATION).
Finally, you may hand deliver
comments to either Service office listed
below (see ADDRESSES). Our practice is
to make comments, including names
and home addresses of respondents,
available for public review during
regular business hours. Individual
respondents may request that we
withhold their home address from the
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Notices
administrative record. We will honor
such requests to the extent allowable by
law. There may also be other
circumstances in which we would
withhold from the administrative record
a respondent’s identity, as allowable by
law. If you wish us to withhold your
name and address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comments. We will not, however,
consider anonymous comments. We
will make all submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
The Florida scrub-jay (scrub-jay) is
geographically isolated from other
subspecies of scrub-jays found in
Mexico and the western United States.
The scrub-jay is found exclusively in
peninsular Florida and is restricted to
xeric uplands (predominately in oakdominated scrub). Increasing urban and
agricultural development, and
subsequent fire protection, has resulted
in habitat degradation, loss and
fragmentation which have adversely
affected the distribution and numbers of
scrub-jays. The total estimated
population is between 7,000 and 11,000
individuals.
The decline in the number and
distribution of scrub-jays in east-central
Florida has been exacerbated by
substantial urban growth in the past 50
years. Much of the historic commercial
and residential development has
occurred on the dry soils which
previously supported scrub-jay habitat.
Based on existing soils data, a major
portion of the historic and current
scrub-jay habitat of coastal east-central
Florida occurs proximal to the current
shoreline and larger river basins. Much
of this area of Florida was settled early
because few wetlands restricted urban
and agricultural development. Due to
the effects of urban and agricultural
development over the past 100 years,
much of the remaining scrub-jay habitat
is now relatively small and isolated.
What remains is largely degraded due to
the exclusion of fire which is needed to
maintain xeric uplands in conditions
suitable for scrub-jays.
A family of scrub-jays have been
observed on the project site. They are
part of a larger complex of scrub-jays
located in a matrix of urban and natural
settings in central Brevard County.
Scrub-jays in urban areas are
particularly vulnerable and typically do
not successfully produce young that
survive to adulthood. Persistent urban
growth in this area will likely result in
further reductions in the amount of
suitable habitat for scrub-jays.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:54 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
Increasing urban pressures are also
likely to result in the continued
degradation of scrub-jay habitat as fire
exclusion slowly results in vegetative
overgrowth. Thus, over the long-term,
scrub-jays are unlikely to persist in
urban settings, and conservation efforts
for this species should target acquisition
and management of large parcels of land
outside the direct influence of
urbanization.
There is little information available
about the status of the indigo snake in
Florida and Brevard County. Like the
scrub jay, this species habitat has been
reduced in amount, degraded and
fragmented from commercial,
residential, and agricultural
development. It may potentially use
essentially all of the habitats found in
the Project area. It has not been
observed onsite but the Applicant
desires to cover the indigo snake in the
incidental take permit.
Construction of the Project’s
infrastructure and facilities will result
in harm to scrub-jays and possibly to the
indigo snake incidental to the carrying
out of these otherwise lawful activities.
Habitat alteration associated with the
proposed residential construction will
reduce the availability of foraging,
sheltering, and possible nesting habitat
for one family of scrub-jays and habitat
for any indigo snakes that occur on the
site. Development would take place
within Section 31, Township 26 South,
Range 37 East, Brevard County, Florida.
The Applicant does not propose to
implement significant on-site
minimization measures to reduce take of
the scrub-jay or indigo snake. The
proposed Project encompasses about
34.6 acres and the footprint of the
homes, buildings, infrastructure and
landscaping preclude retention of scrubjay and indigo snake habitat. On-site
minimization may not be a biologically
viable alternative due to increasing
negative demographic effects caused by
urbanization.
The Applicant proposes to mitigate
for the loss of 9.67 acres of scrub-jay
habitat by purchasing 19.34 acres of
scrub-jay habitat, establishing a
management fund, and donating it to
Brevard County for ownership and
management. The acquisition and
management of this land would also
provide suitable habitat for the indigo
snake.
As stated above, the Service has made
a preliminary determination that the
issuance of the Permit is not a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment
within the meaning of section 102(2)(C)
of NEPA. This preliminary information
may be revised due to public comment
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11261
received in response to this notice and
is based on information contained in the
EA and HCP.
The Service will also evaluate
whether the issuance of a section
10(a)(1)(B) ITP complies with section 7
of the Act by conducting an intraService section 7 consultation. The
results of the biological opinion, in
combination with the above findings,
will be used in the final analysis to
determine whether or not to issue the
ITP.
Dated: February 24, 2005.
Sam D. Hamilton,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 05–4427 Filed 3–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[WY–920–1320–E]
Powder River Regional Coal Team
Activities, Notice of Public Meeting in
Gillette, WY
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Powder River Regional
Coal Team (RCT) has scheduled a public
meeting for April 27, 2005, to review
current and proposed activities in the
Powder River Coal Region and to review
pending coal lease applications (LBA).
DATES: The RCT meeting will begin at 9
a.m. MDT on April 27, 2005. The
meeting is open to the public.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the City Council Chambers, 201 East 5th
Street, Gillette, Wyoming 82718.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Janssen, Regional Coal
Coordinator, Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) Wyoming State
Office, Division of Minerals and Lands,
5353 Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne,
Wyoming 82009, telephone 307–775–
6206 or Rebecca Spurgin, Regional Coal
Coordinator, BLM Montana State Office,
Division of Resources, 5001 Southgate
Drive, Billings, Montana 59101,
telephone 406–896–5080.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
primary purpose of the meeting is to
discuss pending coal LBAs in the
Powder River Basin. Specific coal lease
applications and other matters for the
RCT to consider include:
1. Maysdorf LBA. This LBA, filed by
Cordero Mining Company under the
name of Mt. Logan, was discussed at the
meeting held in May 2002. The
applicant significantly reduced the size
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11260-11261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4427]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Receipt of an Application for an Incidental Take Permit for the
development of the Shadow Wood Subdivision in Brevard County, Fl
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: John Massaro (Applicant) requests an incidental take permit
(ITP) pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of
1973 (U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as amended (Act). The Applicant anticipates
take of the Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) and eastern
indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) incidental to construction of
a mixed residential and commercial use subdivision with supporting
infrastructure in Brevard County, Florida. Construction and its
associated infrastructure would destroy about 9.67 acres of foraging,
sheltering, and possibly nesting habitat for the scrub-jay that is also
possibly used by the indigo snake. A more detailed description of the
mitigation and minimization measures to address the effects of the
Project to the protected species are outlined in the Applicant's
Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), the Service's Environmental Assessment
(EA), and in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below.
The Service also announces the availability of the EA and HCP for
the incidental take application. Copies of the EA and/or HCP may be
obtained by making a request to the Regional Office (see ADDRESSES).
Requests must be in writing to be processed. This notice also advises
the public that the Service has made a preliminary determination that
issuing the ITP is not a major Federal action significantly affecting
the quality of the human environment within the meaning of Section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as
amended. The Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is based on
information contained in the EA and HCP. The final determination will
be made no sooner than 60 days from the date of this notice. This
notice is provided pursuant to Section 10 of the Act and NEPA
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
DATES: Written comments on the ITP application, EA, and HCP should be
sent to the Service's Regional Office (see ADDRESSES) and should be
received on or before May 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review the application and HCP may obtain
a copy by writing the Service's Southeast Regional Office, Atlanta,
Georgia. Please reference permit number TE089883-0 in such requests.
Documents will also be available for public inspection by appointment
during normal business hours at the Regional Office, 1875 Century
Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30345 (Attn: Endangered Species
Permits), or Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 6620
Southpoint Drive South, Suite 310, Jacksonville, Florida 32216.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Dell, Regional HCP
Coordinator, (see ADDRESSES above), telephone: 404/679-7313, facsimile:
404/679-7081; or Mr. Michael Jennings, Fish and Wildlife Biologist,
Jacksonville Field Office, Jacksonville, Florida (see ADDRESSES above),
telephone: 904/232-2580, ext. 113.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you wish to comment, you may submit
comments by any one of several methods. Please reference permit number
TE089883-0 in such comments. You may mail comments to the Service's
Regional Office (see ADDRESSES). You may also comment via the internet
to david_dell@fws.gov. Please submit comments over the internet as an
ASCII file avoiding the use of special characters and any form of
encryption. Please also include your name and return address in your
internet message. If you do not receive a confirmation from us that we
have received your internet message, contact us directly at either
telephone number listed below (see FURTHER INFORMATION). Finally, you
may hand deliver comments to either Service office listed below (see
ADDRESSES). Our practice is to make comments, including names and home
addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular
business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold
their home address from the
[[Page 11261]]
administrative record. We will honor such requests to the extent
allowable by law. There may also be other circumstances in which we
would withhold from the administrative record a respondent's identity,
as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and address,
you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comments. We
will not, however, consider anonymous comments. We will make all
submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.
The Florida scrub-jay (scrub-jay) is geographically isolated from
other subspecies of scrub-jays found in Mexico and the western United
States. The scrub-jay is found exclusively in peninsular Florida and is
restricted to xeric uplands (predominately in oak-dominated scrub).
Increasing urban and agricultural development, and subsequent fire
protection, has resulted in habitat degradation, loss and fragmentation
which have adversely affected the distribution and numbers of scrub-
jays. The total estimated population is between 7,000 and 11,000
individuals.
The decline in the number and distribution of scrub-jays in east-
central Florida has been exacerbated by substantial urban growth in the
past 50 years. Much of the historic commercial and residential
development has occurred on the dry soils which previously supported
scrub-jay habitat. Based on existing soils data, a major portion of the
historic and current scrub-jay habitat of coastal east-central Florida
occurs proximal to the current shoreline and larger river basins. Much
of this area of Florida was settled early because few wetlands
restricted urban and agricultural development. Due to the effects of
urban and agricultural development over the past 100 years, much of the
remaining scrub-jay habitat is now relatively small and isolated. What
remains is largely degraded due to the exclusion of fire which is
needed to maintain xeric uplands in conditions suitable for scrub-jays.
A family of scrub-jays have been observed on the project site. They
are part of a larger complex of scrub-jays located in a matrix of urban
and natural settings in central Brevard County. Scrub-jays in urban
areas are particularly vulnerable and typically do not successfully
produce young that survive to adulthood. Persistent urban growth in
this area will likely result in further reductions in the amount of
suitable habitat for scrub-jays. Increasing urban pressures are also
likely to result in the continued degradation of scrub-jay habitat as
fire exclusion slowly results in vegetative overgrowth. Thus, over the
long-term, scrub-jays are unlikely to persist in urban settings, and
conservation efforts for this species should target acquisition and
management of large parcels of land outside the direct influence of
urbanization.
There is little information available about the status of the
indigo snake in Florida and Brevard County. Like the scrub jay, this
species habitat has been reduced in amount, degraded and fragmented
from commercial, residential, and agricultural development. It may
potentially use essentially all of the habitats found in the Project
area. It has not been observed onsite but the Applicant desires to
cover the indigo snake in the incidental take permit.
Construction of the Project's infrastructure and facilities will
result in harm to scrub-jays and possibly to the indigo snake
incidental to the carrying out of these otherwise lawful activities.
Habitat alteration associated with the proposed residential
construction will reduce the availability of foraging, sheltering, and
possible nesting habitat for one family of scrub-jays and habitat for
any indigo snakes that occur on the site. Development would take place
within Section 31, Township 26 South, Range 37 East, Brevard County,
Florida.
The Applicant does not propose to implement significant on-site
minimization measures to reduce take of the scrub-jay or indigo snake.
The proposed Project encompasses about 34.6 acres and the footprint of
the homes, buildings, infrastructure and landscaping preclude retention
of scrub-jay and indigo snake habitat. On-site minimization may not be
a biologically viable alternative due to increasing negative
demographic effects caused by urbanization.
The Applicant proposes to mitigate for the loss of 9.67 acres of
scrub-jay habitat by purchasing 19.34 acres of scrub-jay habitat,
establishing a management fund, and donating it to Brevard County for
ownership and management. The acquisition and management of this land
would also provide suitable habitat for the indigo snake.
As stated above, the Service has made a preliminary determination
that the issuance of the Permit is not a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of NEPA. This preliminary information may
be revised due to public comment received in response to this notice
and is based on information contained in the EA and HCP.
The Service will also evaluate whether the issuance of a section
10(a)(1)(B) ITP complies with section 7 of the Act by conducting an
intra-Service section 7 consultation. The results of the biological
opinion, in combination with the above findings, will be used in the
final analysis to determine whether or not to issue the ITP.
Dated: February 24, 2005.
Sam D. Hamilton,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 05-4427 Filed 3-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P