BNSF Railway Company-Acquisition and Operation-State of South Dakota, 11309-11310 [05-4417]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Notices
Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 109
New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood Latch
System, 116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids,
124 Accelerator Control Systems, 135
Passenger Car Brake Systems, 201
Occupant Protection in Interior Impact,
202 Head Restraints, 204 Steering
Control Rearward Displacement, 205
Glazing Materials, 206 Door Locks and
Door Retention Components, 207
Seating Systems, 210 Seat Belt
Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield
Mounting, 214 Side Impact Protection,
216 Roof Crush Resistance, 219
Windshield Zone Intrusion, 225 Child
Restraint Anchorage Systems, 301 Fuel
System Integrity, 302 Flammability of
Interior Materials, and 401 Interior
Trunk Release.
The petitioner also contends that the
vehicles are capable of being readily
altered to meet the following standards,
in the manner indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls and
Displays: installation of a U.S.-model
instrument cluster. U.S. version
software must also be downloaded to
meet the requirements of this standard.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective
Devices and Associated Equipment:
inspection of all vehicles and
installation, on vehicles that are not
already so equipped, of U.S.-model
headlamps, front side marker lamps,
taillamp assemblies that incorporate
rear side marker lamps, a high-mounted
stoplamp assembly, and front and rear
side reflex reflectors.
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and
Rims: installation of a tire information
placard.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors:
installation of a U.S.-model passenger
side rearview mirror, or inscription of
the required warning statement on the
face of that mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection:
installation of U.S. version software to
meet the requirements of this standard.
Standard No. 118 Power-Operated
Window, Partition, and Roof Panel
Systems: installation of U.S. version
software, or installation of a
supplemental relay system to meet the
requirements of the standard.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash
Protection: installation of U.S. version
software to ensure that the seat belt
warning system meets the requirements
of this standard.
Petitioner states that the vehicle’s
restraint system components include
U.S.-model airbags and knee bolsters,
and combination lap and shoulder belts
at the outboard front designated seating
positions.
Standard No. 209 Seat Belt
Assemblies: inspection of all vehicles
and replacement of any non-U.S.-model
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:54 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
seat belts with U.S.-model components
on vehicles that are not already so
equipped.
The petitioner also states that all
vehicles will be inspected for
conformity with the Bumper Standard
found in 49 CFR Part 581 and that any
non-U.S.-model components necessary
for conformity with this standard will
be replaced with U.S.-model
components.
The petitioner additionally states that
a vehicle identification plate must be
affixed to the vehicles near the left
windshield post to meet the
requirements of 49 CFR Part 565.
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on the petition
described above. Comments should refer
to the docket number and be submitted
to: Docket Management, Room PL–401,
400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC
20590. [Docket hours are from 9 a.m. to
5 p.m.]. It is requested but not required
that 10 copies be submitted.
All comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated above will be considered, and
will be available for examination in the
docket at the above address both before
and after that date. To the extent
possible, comments filed after the
closing date will also be considered.
Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and
(b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority
at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 05–4297 Filed 3–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34667]
BNSF Railway Company—Acquisition
and Operation—State of South Dakota
Surface Transportation Board.
Notice of filing of application
and request for public comments.
AGENCY:
11309
South Dakota (the State).2 The Core
Lines, which are described in a July 10,
1986 Operating Agreement between
Burlington Northern Railroad Company
(BN, a BNSF predecessor) and the State,
extend principally: between milepost
(MP) 777.0 near Aberdeen, SD, and MP
650.6 near Mitchell, SD; between MP
518.9 near Sioux City, IA, and MP 649.7
near Mitchell, SD; between MP 293.1
near Canton, SD, and MP 650.6 near
Mitchell, SD; 3 between MPs 74.1 and
68.8 in Sioux Falls, SD; between MP
68.8 near Sioux Falls, SD, and MP 49.4
near Canton, SD; and between MPs
511.9 and 518.9 in Sioux City, IA.
DATES: Comments respecting the BNSF
application must be filed by March 11,
2005. Replies to such comments must be
filed by March 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Any filing submitted in this
proceeding must be submitted either via
the Board’s e-filing format or in the
traditional paper format. Any person
using e-filing should comply with the
instructions found on the Board’s
https://www.stb.dot.gov Web site, at the
‘‘E-FILING’’ link. Any person submitting
a filing in the traditional paper format
should send an original and 10 paper
copies of the filing (and also an IBMcompatible floppy disk with any textual
submission in any version of either
Microsoft Word or WordPerfect) to:
Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, one copy of each
filing in this proceeding must be sent to
each of the following (any such copy
may be sent by e-mail or fax, but only
if service by e-mail or fax is acceptable
to the recipient): Adrian L. Steel, Jr.,
Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP, 1909
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006–
1101 (phone: (202) 263–3237; fax: (202)
263–5237); and Sarah W. Bailiff, BNSF
Railway Company, 2500 Lou Menk
Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76131 (phone:
(817) 352–2354; fax: (817) 352–2397).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 565–1609.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.]
ACTION:
SUMMARY: BNSF Railway Company
(BNSF) 1 has filed an application under
49 U.S.C. 10901 for authority to acquire
and operate approximately 368 miles of
railroad lines (referred to as the ‘‘Core
Lines’’) that are owned by the State of
1 Effective January 20, 2005, The Burlington
Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company changed
its name to BNSF Railway Company.
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2 BNSF previously indicated that the Core Lines
consist of approximately 369.7 miles of railroad
lines. See The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe
Railway Company C—Acquisition and Operation
Exemption—State of South Dakota, STB Finance
Docket No. 34645 (STB served Jan. 19, 2005). The
slight discrepancy (the 368 miles now indicated vs.
the 369.7 miles previously indicated) has not been
explained.
3 The distance between MP 293.1 near Canton
and MP 650.6 near Mitchell is approximately 81.50
miles. See BNSF’s application, Exhibit B, Appendix
1 at 6. BNSF has not explained the discrepancy
respecting the milepost designations.
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
11310
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Notices
The Core
Lines were once part of the rail system
operated by the Chicago, Milwaukee, St.
Paul and Pacific Railroad Company (the
Milwaukee Road). The Milwaukee Road
entered bankruptcy in 1977, and, in
1980, it received, both from the
Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC)
and from the bankruptcy court, approval
to abandon the Core Lines. In March
1980, the Milwaukee Road terminated
its Core Lines operations, and thereafter,
for more than a year, shippers located
on the Core Lines had no rail service of
any kind. In 1981, the abandoned Core
Lines were acquired by the State, and,
since on or about July 6, 1981, BN/BNSF
has provided common carrier rail
service over the Core Lines pursuant to
various agreements (the most recent of
which is the 1986 Operating Agreement)
with the State,4 and pursuant to a
Modified Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity (the
modified certificate) issued by the ICC.
See 49 CFR Part 1150, Subpart C
(§ 1150.21 et seq.) (these are the
‘‘modified certificate’’ regulations that
apply to operations over abandoned rail
lines that have been acquired, through
purchase or lease, by a State).
A contractual dispute has arisen
respecting the scope of the rights
retained by or granted to the State and/
or BNSF under the 1986 Operating
Agreement. On June 29, 2004, BNSF
advised the State that it desired to
exercise its ‘‘purchase option’’ right
(said to be provided in the 1986
Operating Agreement) to acquire the
Core Lines. The State apparently
contends that the 1986 Operating
Agreement gives BNSF no right to
acquire the Core Lines and/or gives the
State a right to allow other railroads to
operate over the Core Lines. BNSF
apparently contends that the 1986
Operating Agreement gives BNSF a right
to acquire the Core Lines and gives the
State no right to allow other railroads to
operate over the Core Lines. The dispute
concerning the various rights asserted
by the State and BNSF is now the
subject of litigation in The Burlington
Northern and Santa Fe Railway
Company v. State of South Dakota, Civ.
No. 04–470 (S.D. 6th Circuit).
The contractual dispute between
BNSF and the State must be resolved by
the court; that dispute will not be
resolved by the Board. However, a
related matter—BNSF’s request that the
Board authorize BNSF to acquire and
operate the Core Lines—must be
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
4 BNSF advises that, under the 1986 Operating
Agreement, it currently operates over the Core Lines
as a lessee (i.e., the 1986 Operating Agreement
provides for a lease of the Core Lines to BNSF).
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:54 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
resolved by the Board. But even if the
Board authorizes BNSF to acquire the
Core Lines, that authorization is only
permissive. If the South Dakota state
court decides that BNSF does not have,
under the 1986 Operating Agreement, a
right to acquire the Core Lines, then any
Board-granted authority cannot be
exercised.5
On December 23, 2004, BNSF filed, in
STB Finance Docket No. 34645, The
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe
Railway Company—Acquisition and
Operation Exemption—State of South
Dakota, a verified notice of exemption
under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire and
operate the Core Lines. By decision
served January 14, 2005,6 the Board
rejected BNSF’s § 1150.31 exemption
notice on the ground that the
transaction contemplated by BNSF (the
transfer of the Core Lines from modified
certificate’’ status to § 10901 ‘‘railroad
line’’ status) was not appropriate for
consideration under the § 1150.31 ‘‘class
exemption’’ procedure. The Board
explained that, whereas the § 1150.31
class exemption typically applies to
routine transactions that are not subject
to substantial controversy and
opposition, the transaction
contemplated by BNSF was neither
routine nor noncontroversial. Therefore,
the Board required BNSF to file either
a § 10502 exemption petition or a formal
§ 10901 application, in order to compile
a record that would allow the Board to
resolve the issues raised. The Board
specified that BNSF should file a
petition or an application as soon as
possible; that BNSF should include, in
this filing, its entire ‘‘case in chief’’; that
the State should submit its reply to this
filing no later than the 21st day after the
date on which the filing was made; that
the State should include, in this
submission, its entire case; and that
BNSF should submit its response to the
State’s reply no later than the 14th day
after the date on which the reply was
filed.
On February 18, 2005, BNSF filed, in
STB Finance Docket No. 34667, BNSF
Railway Company—Acquisition and
Operation—State of South Dakota, a
formal ‘‘10901 application. This
application seeks authority, under 49
U.S.C. 10901 and 49 CFR part 1150,
subpart A (§ 1150.1 et seq.), to acquire
has acknowledged this point. See BNSF’s
application at 4: ‘‘BNSF recognizes that it will need
to prevail in acquiring the Core Lines from the State
whether through voluntary conveyance by the State
or involuntary conveyance as may be ordered by the
state court before BNSF can acquire title to the
Lines.
6 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway
Company C Acquisition and Operation Exemption
C State of South Dakota, STB Finance Docket No.
34645 (STB served Jan. 14, 2005).
PO 00000
5 BNSF
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and operate the Core Lines. The formal
application filed in STB Finance Docket
No. 34667 contemplates the same
transaction that was contemplated by
the class exemption notice previously
filed in STB Finance Docket No. 34645:
the transfer of the Core Lines from
‘‘modified certificate’’ status to § 10901
‘‘railroad line’’ status.
As indicated in the decision served
January 14, 2005, in STB Finance
Docket No. 34645, comments respecting
the BNSF application must be filed by
March 11, 2005 (the 21st day after the
date on which the application was
filed), and replies to such comments
must be filed by March 25, 2005 (the
14th day after March 11th).
The application filed by BNSF in STB
Finance Docket No. 34667 is available
for public inspection in the Docket File
Reading Room (Room 755) at the offices
of the Surface Transportation Board,
1925 K Street, NW., in Washington, DC.
The application is also available for
inspection at BNSF’s offices, at 2500
Lou Menk Drive, in Fort Worth, TX. The
application is also available for viewing
and downloading at the Board’s Web
site, at https://www.stb.dot.gov. In
addition, copies of the application may
be obtained from BNSF’s representatives
(Adrian L. Steel, Jr., and Sarah W.
Bailiff) at the addresses indicated above.
Board decisions and notices are
available on the Board’s Web site at
https://www.stb.dot.gov.
This decision will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of
energy resources.
Decided: March 2, 2005.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–4417 Filed 3–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
March 2, 2005.
The Department of the Treasury has
submitted the following public
information collection requirement(s) to
OMB for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Copies of the
submission(s) may be obtained by
calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance
Officer listed. Comments regarding this
information collection should be
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11309-11310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4417]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34667]
BNSF Railway Company--Acquisition and Operation--State of South
Dakota
AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.
ACTION: Notice of filing of application and request for public
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) \1\ has filed an application under
49 U.S.C. 10901 for authority to acquire and operate approximately 368
miles of railroad lines (referred to as the ``Core Lines'') that are
owned by the State of South Dakota (the State).\2\ The Core Lines,
which are described in a July 10, 1986 Operating Agreement between
Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BN, a BNSF predecessor) and the
State, extend principally: between milepost (MP) 777.0 near Aberdeen,
SD, and MP 650.6 near Mitchell, SD; between MP 518.9 near Sioux City,
IA, and MP 649.7 near Mitchell, SD; between MP 293.1 near Canton, SD,
and MP 650.6 near Mitchell, SD; \3\ between MPs 74.1 and 68.8 in Sioux
Falls, SD; between MP 68.8 near Sioux Falls, SD, and MP 49.4 near
Canton, SD; and between MPs 511.9 and 518.9 in Sioux City, IA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Effective January 20, 2005, The Burlington Northern and
Santa Fe Railway Company changed its name to BNSF Railway Company.
\2\ BNSF previously indicated that the Core Lines consist of
approximately 369.7 miles of railroad lines. See The Burlington
Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company C--Acquisition and Operation
Exemption--State of South Dakota, STB Finance Docket No. 34645 (STB
served Jan. 19, 2005). The slight discrepancy (the 368 miles now
indicated vs. the 369.7 miles previously indicated) has not been
explained.
\3\ The distance between MP 293.1 near Canton and MP 650.6 near
Mitchell is approximately 81.50 miles. See BNSF's application,
Exhibit B, Appendix 1 at 6. BNSF has not explained the discrepancy
respecting the milepost designations.
DATES: Comments respecting the BNSF application must be filed by March
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
11, 2005. Replies to such comments must be filed by March 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Any filing submitted in this proceeding must be submitted
either via the Board's e-filing format or in the traditional paper
format. Any person using e-filing should comply with the instructions
found on the Board's https://www.stb.dot. gov Web site, at the ``E-
FILING'' link. Any person submitting a filing in the traditional paper
format should send an original and 10 paper copies of the filing (and
also an IBM-compatible floppy disk with any textual submission in any
version of either Microsoft Word or WordPerfect) to: Surface
Transportation Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In
addition, one copy of each filing in this proceeding must be sent to
each of the following (any such copy may be sent by e-mail or fax, but
only if service by e-mail or fax is acceptable to the recipient):
Adrian L. Steel, Jr., Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP, 1909 K Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20006-1101 (phone: (202) 263-3237; fax: (202) 263-5237);
and Sarah W. Bailiff, BNSF Railway Company, 2500 Lou Menk Drive, Fort
Worth, TX 76131 (phone: (817) 352-2354; fax: (817) 352-2397).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 565-1609.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.]
[[Page 11310]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Core Lines were once part of the rail
system operated by the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific
Railroad Company (the Milwaukee Road). The Milwaukee Road entered
bankruptcy in 1977, and, in 1980, it received, both from the Interstate
Commerce Commission (ICC) and from the bankruptcy court, approval to
abandon the Core Lines. In March 1980, the Milwaukee Road terminated
its Core Lines operations, and thereafter, for more than a year,
shippers located on the Core Lines had no rail service of any kind. In
1981, the abandoned Core Lines were acquired by the State, and, since
on or about July 6, 1981, BN/BNSF has provided common carrier rail
service over the Core Lines pursuant to various agreements (the most
recent of which is the 1986 Operating Agreement) with the State,\4\ and
pursuant to a Modified Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity
(the modified certificate) issued by the ICC. See 49 CFR Part 1150,
Subpart C (Sec. 1150.21 et seq.) (these are the ``modified
certificate'' regulations that apply to operations over abandoned rail
lines that have been acquired, through purchase or lease, by a State).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ BNSF advises that, under the 1986 Operating Agreement, it
currently operates over the Core Lines as a lessee (i.e., the 1986
Operating Agreement provides for a lease of the Core Lines to BNSF).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A contractual dispute has arisen respecting the scope of the rights
retained by or granted to the State and/or BNSF under the 1986
Operating Agreement. On June 29, 2004, BNSF advised the State that it
desired to exercise its ``purchase option'' right (said to be provided
in the 1986 Operating Agreement) to acquire the Core Lines. The State
apparently contends that the 1986 Operating Agreement gives BNSF no
right to acquire the Core Lines and/or gives the State a right to allow
other railroads to operate over the Core Lines. BNSF apparently
contends that the 1986 Operating Agreement gives BNSF a right to
acquire the Core Lines and gives the State no right to allow other
railroads to operate over the Core Lines. The dispute concerning the
various rights asserted by the State and BNSF is now the subject of
litigation in The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company v.
State of South Dakota, Civ. No. 04-470 (S.D. 6th Circuit).
The contractual dispute between BNSF and the State must be resolved
by the court; that dispute will not be resolved by the Board. However,
a related matter--BNSF's request that the Board authorize BNSF to
acquire and operate the Core Lines--must be resolved by the Board. But
even if the Board authorizes BNSF to acquire the Core Lines, that
authorization is only permissive. If the South Dakota state court
decides that BNSF does not have, under the 1986 Operating Agreement, a
right to acquire the Core Lines, then any Board-granted authority
cannot be exercised.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ BNSF has acknowledged this point. See BNSF's application at
4: ``BNSF recognizes that it will need to prevail in acquiring the
Core Lines from the State whether through voluntary conveyance by
the State or involuntary conveyance as may be ordered by the state
court before BNSF can acquire title to the Lines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 23, 2004, BNSF filed, in STB Finance Docket No. 34645,
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company--Acquisition and
Operation Exemption--State of South Dakota, a verified notice of
exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire and operate the Core Lines.
By decision served January 14, 2005,\6\ the Board rejected BNSF's Sec.
1150.31 exemption notice on the ground that the transaction
contemplated by BNSF (the transfer of the Core Lines from modified
certificate'' status to Sec. 10901 ``railroad line'' status) was not
appropriate for consideration under the Sec. 1150.31 ``class
exemption'' procedure. The Board explained that, whereas the Sec.
1150.31 class exemption typically applies to routine transactions that
are not subject to substantial controversy and opposition, the
transaction contemplated by BNSF was neither routine nor
noncontroversial. Therefore, the Board required BNSF to file either a
Sec. 10502 exemption petition or a formal Sec. 10901 application, in
order to compile a record that would allow the Board to resolve the
issues raised. The Board specified that BNSF should file a petition or
an application as soon as possible; that BNSF should include, in this
filing, its entire ``case in chief''; that the State should submit its
reply to this filing no later than the 21st day after the date on which
the filing was made; that the State should include, in this submission,
its entire case; and that BNSF should submit its response to the
State's reply no later than the 14th day after the date on which the
reply was filed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company C
Acquisition and Operation Exemption C State of South Dakota, STB
Finance Docket No. 34645 (STB served Jan. 14, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 18, 2005, BNSF filed, in STB Finance Docket No. 34667,
BNSF Railway Company--Acquisition and Operation--State of South Dakota,
a formal `` 10901 application. This application seeks authority, under
49 U.S.C. 10901 and 49 CFR part 1150, subpart A (Sec. 1150.1 et seq.),
to acquire and operate the Core Lines. The formal application filed in
STB Finance Docket No. 34667 contemplates the same transaction that was
contemplated by the class exemption notice previously filed in STB
Finance Docket No. 34645: the transfer of the Core Lines from
``modified certificate'' status to Sec. 10901 ``railroad line''
status.
As indicated in the decision served January 14, 2005, in STB
Finance Docket No. 34645, comments respecting the BNSF application must
be filed by March 11, 2005 (the 21st day after the date on which the
application was filed), and replies to such comments must be filed by
March 25, 2005 (the 14th day after March 11th).
The application filed by BNSF in STB Finance Docket No. 34667 is
available for public inspection in the Docket File Reading Room (Room
755) at the offices of the Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K Street,
NW., in Washington, DC. The application is also available for
inspection at BNSF's offices, at 2500 Lou Menk Drive, in Fort Worth,
TX. The application is also available for viewing and downloading at
the Board's Web site, at https://www.stb.dot.gov. In addition, copies of
the application may be obtained from BNSF's representatives (Adrian L.
Steel, Jr., and Sarah W. Bailiff) at the addresses indicated above.
Board decisions and notices are available on the Board's Web site
at https://www.stb.dot.gov.
This decision will not significantly affect either the quality of
the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
Decided: March 2, 2005.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-4417 Filed 3-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
