Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A320 Series Airplanes, 11170-11172 [05-4408]
Download as PDF
11170
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
section for a location to examine the
regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
Related Information
(h) Canadian airworthiness directive CF–
2004–08, dated April 20, 2004, also addresses
the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
24, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–4407 Filed 3–7–05; 8:45 am]
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Federal Aviation Administration
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland,
Inc.): Docket No. FAA–2005–20481;
Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–183–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
must receive comments on this AD action by
April 7, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model
DHC–8 102, –103, –106, –201, –202, –301,
–311, and –315 airplanes, serial numbers 003
through 584 inclusive, certificated in any
category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD is prompted by the discovery
that a single malfunction of the torque tube
could result in both flight control columns
being supported by only one self-aligning
bearing. We are issuing this AD to prevent
the torque tube from fouling against the
underfloor control cables, which could result
in reduced controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Installation
(f) Within 5,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, install control
column torque tube catchers on the control
columns of the flight controls by
incorporating Modsum 8Q101338 in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
S.B.8–27–90, dated October 28, 2003.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(g) The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, has the authority to
approve alternative methods of compliance
for this AD if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20500; Directorate
Identifier 2004–NM–235–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A320 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A320 series
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require post-maintenance bleeding of
accumulated air from, or ground
functional testing of, the ram air turbine
(RAT) system; modifying and
reidentifying the airborne ground check
module of the RAT system; and
replacing the RAT reducer assembly if
applicable. This proposed AD is
prompted by reports of unsuccessful inflight RAT tests during which a
deployed RAT failed to pressurize the
blue hydraulic circuit of the RAT
system. We are proposing this AD to
prevent failure of the RAT during an inflight emergency, which could lead to
loss of hydraulic and electrical power
and reduced controllability of the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• By fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France.
You can examine the contents of this
AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of
the Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
This docket number is FAA–2005–
20500; the directorate identifier for this
docket is 2004–NM–235–AD.
Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–2125;
fax (425) 227–1149.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2005–20500; Directorate Identifier
2004–NM–235–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments submitted by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of our docket
Web site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You can
review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you can visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Examining the Docket
You can examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the DMS
receives them.
Discussion
´ ´
The Direction Generale de l’Aviation
Civile (DGAC), which is the
airworthiness authority for France,
notified us that an unsafe condition may
exist on certain Airbus Model A320
series airplanes. The DGAC advises that
several operators have reported
unsuccessful in-flight ram air turbine
(RAT) system tests during which a
deployed RAT failed to pressurize the
blue hydraulic circuit of the RAT
system. Investigation revealed that the
warming flow jet plug installed in the
RAT main housing can allow free air to
accumulate within the RAT system,
leading to RAT pump cavitations. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in failure of the RAT during an in-flight
emergency, which could lead to loss of
hydraulic and electrical power and
reduced controllability of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued All Operators Telex
(AOT) A320–29A1112, Revision 01,
dated April 8, 2004. The AOT describes
procedures for either bleeding
accumulated air from the RAT system or
doing ground functional testing of the
RAT after performing any maintenance
on the blue hydraulic circuit of the RAT
system.
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
A320–29–1111, dated June 29, 2004.
The service bulletin describes
procedures for modifying and
reidentifying the airborne ground check
module (AGCM) of the RAT system;
and, for certain airplanes, replacing the
reducer assembly with a new reducer
assembly. Accomplishing the actions of
the service bulletin would end the need
for the actions specified by the AOT.
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–29–
1111 refers to Hamilton Sundstrand
Service Bulletin ERPS13GCM–29–5,
dated June 29, 2004, as an additional
source of service information for
modifying and reidentifying the AGCM.
The DGAC mandated the service
information and issued French
airworthiness directive F–2004–150,
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
dated September 1, 2004, to ensure the
continued airworthiness of these
airplanes in France.
Accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information is intended to
adequately address the unsafe
condition.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
These airplane models are
manufactured in France and are type
certificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of section
21.29 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the
applicable bilateral airworthiness
agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral
airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has
kept the FAA informed of the situation
described above. We have examined the
DGAC’s findings, evaluated all pertinent
information, and determined that we
need to issue an AD for products of this
type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the
actions specified in the service
information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
This proposed AD would affect about
130 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The proposed system bleed/functional
test would take about 1 work hour per
airplane, at an average labor rate of $65
per work hour. Based on these figures,
the estimated cost of the proposed AD
for U.S. operators is $8,450, or $65 per
airplane.
The proposed AGCM replacement
would take about 2 work hours per
airplane, at an average labor rate of $65
per work hour. Required parts would be
supplied at no charge. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of this
proposed action for U.S. operators is
$16,900, or $130 per airplane.
The proposed reducer replacement,
for subject airplanes, would take about
1 work hour per airplane, at an average
labor rate of $65 per work hour.
Required parts would be supplied at no
charge. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of this proposed action is
$65 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11171
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the
regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2005–20500;
Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–235–AD.
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
11172
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
must receive comments on this AD action by
April 7, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A320
series airplanes, certificated in any category;
equipped with Hamilton Sundstrand
airborne ground check module (AGCM)
having part number 769104, 769105, or
760106 installed; except those airplanes on
which Airbus Modification 27189 has been
done in production and on which Airbus
Modification 28413 has not been done.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by reports of
unsuccessful in-flight ram air turbine (RAT)
tests during which a deployed RAT failed to
pressurize the blue hydraulic circuit of the
RAT system. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the RAT system during an
in-flight emergency, which could lead to loss
of hydraulic and electrical power and
reduced controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
RAT System Bleeding/Functional Test
(f) For airplanes on which maintenance has
been performed on the blue hydraulic circuit
as of the effective date of this AD: Within 3
days or 20 flight hours after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first, bleed
accumulated air from, or perform a ground
functional test of, the RAT system; by
accomplishing all the actions specified in
Airbus All Operators Telex (AOT) A320–
29A1112, Revision 01, dated April 8, 2004.
Thereafter, bleed the blue hydraulic circuit as
specified in the AOT within 3 days or 20
flight hours after performing any
maintenance on the blue hydraulic circuit.
(g) For airplanes on which maintenance
has not been performed on the blue hydraulic
circuit as of the effective date of this AD:
Bleed the blue hydraulic circuit as specified
in the AOT within 3 days or 20 flight hours
after performing any maintenance on the blue
hydraulic circuit.
Replacement of AGCM and Reducer
(h) Within 35 months after the effective
date of this AD, replace the AGCM with a
modified and reidentified AGCM; and
replace the reducer with a new reducer as
applicable; in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–29–1111, dated June
29, 2004. Replacing the AGCM, and the
reducer as applicable, ends the actions
required by paragraphs (f) and (g) of this AD.
Note 1: Airbus Service Bulletin A320–29–
1111 refers to Hamilton Sundstrand Service
Bulletin ERPS13GCM–29–5, dated June 29,
2004, as an additional source of service
information for modifying and reidentifying
the AGCM.
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(i) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(j) French airworthiness directive F–2004–
150, dated September 1, 2004, also addresses
the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
28, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–4408 Filed 3–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20501; Directorate
Identifier 2004–NM–251–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 Series
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
EMBRAER Model ERJ 170 series
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require inspecting the engine fire
handles of the overhead panel in the
cockpit, and replacing the engine fire
handles if necessary. This proposed AD
is prompted by reports of failure of the
internal circuit of the engine fire
handles of the overhead panel in the
cockpit. We are proposing this AD to
prevent failure of the internal circuit of
the engine fire handles, which could
result in failure of the fuel shut-off
valves to close and failure of the fire
extinguishing agent to discharge in the
event of an engine fire.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• By fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER), P.O. Box 343—CEP 12.225,
Sao Jose dos Campos—SP, Brazil.
You can examine the contents of this
AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street
SW., room PL–401, on the plaza level of
the Nassif Building, Washington, DC.
This docket number is FAA–2005–
20501; the directorate identifier for this
docket is 2004–NM–251–AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Groves, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056; telephone (425) 227–1503;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2005–20501; Directorate Identifier
2004–NM–251–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments submitted by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of our docket
Web site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You can
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 8, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11170-11172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4408]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2005-20500; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-235-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A320 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Airbus Model A320 series airplanes. This proposed AD would
require post-maintenance bleeding of accumulated air from, or ground
functional testing of, the ram air turbine (RAT) system; modifying and
reidentifying the airborne ground check module of the RAT system; and
replacing the RAT reducer assembly if applicable. This proposed AD is
prompted by reports of unsuccessful in-flight RAT tests during which a
deployed RAT failed to pressurize the blue hydraulic circuit of the RAT
system. We are proposing this AD to prevent failure of the RAT during
an in-flight emergency, which could lead to loss of hydraulic and
electrical power and reduced controllability of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 7, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590.
By fax: (202) 493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France.
You can examine the contents of this AD docket on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-
401, on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, Washington, DC. This
docket number is FAA-2005-20500; the directorate identifier for this
docket is 2004-NM-235-AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2005-20500;
Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-235-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments submitted by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of our
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You can review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
can visit https://dms.dot.gov.
[[Page 11171]]
Examining the Docket
You can examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after the DMS receives them.
Discussion
The Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC),
which is the airworthiness authority for France, notified us that an
unsafe condition may exist on certain Airbus Model A320 series
airplanes. The DGAC advises that several operators have reported
unsuccessful in-flight ram air turbine (RAT) system tests during which
a deployed RAT failed to pressurize the blue hydraulic circuit of the
RAT system. Investigation revealed that the warming flow jet plug
installed in the RAT main housing can allow free air to accumulate
within the RAT system, leading to RAT pump cavitations. This condition,
if not corrected, could result in failure of the RAT during an in-
flight emergency, which could lead to loss of hydraulic and electrical
power and reduced controllability of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued All Operators Telex (AOT) A320-29A1112, Revision
01, dated April 8, 2004. The AOT describes procedures for either
bleeding accumulated air from the RAT system or doing ground functional
testing of the RAT after performing any maintenance on the blue
hydraulic circuit of the RAT system.
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-29-1111, dated June 29,
2004. The service bulletin describes procedures for modifying and
reidentifying the airborne ground check module (AGCM) of the RAT
system; and, for certain airplanes, replacing the reducer assembly with
a new reducer assembly. Accomplishing the actions of the service
bulletin would end the need for the actions specified by the AOT.
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1111 refers to Hamilton Sundstrand
Service Bulletin ERPS13GCM-29-5, dated June 29, 2004, as an additional
source of service information for modifying and reidentifying the AGCM.
The DGAC mandated the service information and issued French
airworthiness directive F-2004-150, dated September 1, 2004, to ensure
the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in France.
Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
These airplane models are manufactured in France and are type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. We have examined the DGAC's findings,
evaluated all pertinent information, and determined that we need to
issue an AD for products of this type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing the actions specified in the service information
described previously.
Costs of Compliance
This proposed AD would affect about 130 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The proposed system bleed/functional test would take about 1 work
hour per airplane, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based
on these figures, the estimated cost of the proposed AD for U.S.
operators is $8,450, or $65 per airplane.
The proposed AGCM replacement would take about 2 work hours per
airplane, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Required parts
would be supplied at no charge. Based on these figures, the estimated
cost of this proposed action for U.S. operators is $16,900, or $130 per
airplane.
The proposed reducer replacement, for subject airplanes, would take
about 1 work hour per airplane, at an average labor rate of $65 per
work hour. Required parts would be supplied at no charge. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of this proposed action is $65 per
airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2005-20500; Directorate Identifier 2004-NM-
235-AD.
[[Page 11172]]
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration must receive comments on
this AD action by April 7, 2005.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A320 series airplanes,
certificated in any category; equipped with Hamilton Sundstrand
airborne ground check module (AGCM) having part number 769104,
769105, or 760106 installed; except those airplanes on which Airbus
Modification 27189 has been done in production and on which Airbus
Modification 28413 has not been done.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by reports of unsuccessful in-flight
ram air turbine (RAT) tests during which a deployed RAT failed to
pressurize the blue hydraulic circuit of the RAT system. We are
issuing this AD to prevent failure of the RAT system during an in-
flight emergency, which could lead to loss of hydraulic and
electrical power and reduced controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
RAT System Bleeding/Functional Test
(f) For airplanes on which maintenance has been performed on the
blue hydraulic circuit as of the effective date of this AD: Within 3
days or 20 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, bleed accumulated air from, or perform a
ground functional test of, the RAT system; by accomplishing all the
actions specified in Airbus All Operators Telex (AOT) A320-29A1112,
Revision 01, dated April 8, 2004. Thereafter, bleed the blue
hydraulic circuit as specified in the AOT within 3 days or 20 flight
hours after performing any maintenance on the blue hydraulic
circuit.
(g) For airplanes on which maintenance has not been performed on
the blue hydraulic circuit as of the effective date of this AD:
Bleed the blue hydraulic circuit as specified in the AOT within 3
days or 20 flight hours after performing any maintenance on the blue
hydraulic circuit.
Replacement of AGCM and Reducer
(h) Within 35 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the AGCM with a modified and reidentified AGCM; and replace
the reducer with a new reducer as applicable; in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1111,
dated June 29, 2004. Replacing the AGCM, and the reducer as
applicable, ends the actions required by paragraphs (f) and (g) of
this AD.
Note 1: Airbus Service Bulletin A320-29-1111 refers to Hamilton
Sundstrand Service Bulletin ERPS13GCM-29-5, dated June 29, 2004, as
an additional source of service information for modifying and
reidentifying the AGCM.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(j) French airworthiness directive F-2004-150, dated September
1, 2004, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 28, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-4408 Filed 3-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P