Winter Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Secretary's Decision and Referendum Order on Proposed Amendments to Marketing Agreement and Order No. 927, 11155-11165 [05-4306]

Download as PDF 11155 Proposed Rules Federal Register Vol. 70, No. 44 Tuesday, March 8, 2005 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 927 [Docket No. AO–F&V–927–A1; FV04–927–1 PR] Winter Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Secretary’s Decision and Referendum Order on Proposed Amendments to Marketing Agreement and Order No. 927 Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum order. AGENCY: This decision proposes amending the marketing agreement and order (order) for winter pears grown in Oregon and Washington, and provides producers with the opportunity to vote in a referendum to determine if they favor the changes. The amendments are based on recommendations jointly proposed by the Winter Pear Control Committee and the Northwest Fresh Bartlett Marketing Committee, which are responsible for local administration of orders 927 and 931, respectively. Marketing Agreement and Order No. 931 regulates the handling of fresh Bartlett pears grown in Oregon and Washington. The amendments would combine the winter pear and fresh Bartlett orders into a single program under marketing order 927, and would add authority to assess pears for processing. All of the proposals are intended to streamline industry organization and improve the administration, operation, and functioning of the program. DATES: The referendum will be conducted from March 22 through April 8, 2005. The representative period for the purpose of the referendum is July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Schmaedick, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural SUMMARY: VerDate jul<14>2003 13:41 Mar 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 Marketing Service, USDA, Post Office Box 1035, Moab, UT 84532, telephone: (435) 259–7988, fax: (435) 259–4945. Small businesses may request information on this proceeding by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; telephone: (202) 720–2491, fax: (202) 720–8938. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior documents in this proceeding: Notice of Hearing issued on March 24, 2004, and published in the March 30, 2004, issue of the Federal Register (69 FR 16501), and a Recommended Decision issued on January 5, 2005, and published in the January 13, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 2520). This action is governed by the provisions of sections 556 and 557 of title 5 of the United States Code and is therefore excluded from the requirements of Executive Order 12866. Preliminary Statement The amendments are based on the record of a public hearing held on April 13 and 14, 2004, in Yakima, Washington and on April 16, 2004, in Portland, Oregon. The hearing was held to consider the proposed amendment of Marketing Agreement and Order No. 927, regulating the handling of winter pears grown in the States of Oregon and Washington, hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The hearing was held pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act,’’ and the applicable rules of practice and procedure governing the formulation of marketing agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR part 900). Notice of this hearing was published in the Federal Register on March 30, 2004 (69 FR 16501). The notice of hearing contained order changes proposed by both the Winter Pear Control Committee and the Northwest Fresh Bartlett Marketing Committee, which are responsible for local administration of orders 927 and 931, respectively. Marketing order 927 regulates the handling of winter pears grown in Oregon and Washington. Marketing order 931 regulates the handling of Bartlett pears in the same production area. The amendments included in this decision would: PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 1. Expand the definition of ‘‘pears’’ to include all varieties of pears classified as summer/fall pears in addition to winter pears; add Concorde, Packham, and Taylor’s Gold pears to the current list of winter pear varieties; and add a third category of pears which would include varieties not classified as summer/fall or winter pears. This amendment would extend program coverage to all pears grown in Oregon and Washington. 2. Revise the definition of ‘‘size’’ to include language currently used within the industry. 3. Extend the order’s coverage to pears for processing by revising the definition of ‘‘handle,’’ and adding definitions of ‘‘processor’’ and ‘‘process.’’ 4. Establish districts for pears for processing. This amendment would divide the order’s production area into two districts for pears for processing: one being the State of Oregon and the other being the State of Washington. 5. Dissolve the current Winter Pear Control Committee and establish two new administrative committees: The Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee (Committees). This proposal would add a public member and public alternate member seat to both of the newly established Committees and would remove Section 927.36, Public advisors. The Committees would coordinate administration of Marketing Order 927, with each Committee recommending assessments and administering program functions specific to their commodity. Coordinated administration would allow each Committee to make decisions on behalf of the commodity they represent, yet combine administrative functions, when applicable, to maximize efficiencies and minimize program costs. Additionally, related changes would be made to order provisions governing nomination and selection of members and their alternates, terms of office, eligibility for membership, and quorum and voting requirements, to reflect the proposed dual committee structure. 6. Authorize changes in the number of Committee members and alternates, and allowing reapportionment of committee membership among districts and groups (i.e., growers, handlers, and processors). Such changes would require a Committee recommendation and approval by the Department. E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1 11156 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules 7. Add authority to establish assessment rates for each category of pears, including: summer/fall pears, winter pears, and all other pears. In addition, rates of assessment could be different for fresh pears and pears for processing in each category, and could include supplemental rates on individual varieties. 8. Add authority for container marking requirements for fresh pears. 9. Remove the order provision allowing grower exemptions from regulation. This is a tool no longer used by the industry and, thus, is considered obsolete. 10. Amend § 927.70, Reports, to update order language regarding confidentiality requirements to conform to language under the Act. 11. Clarify inspection requirements and adding authority to eliminate those requirements if an alternative, adequate method of ensuring compliance with quality and size standards in effect under the order can be developed. 12. Eliminate the current exemptions for pears for processing and for pears shipped to storage warehouses. 13. Provide that separate continuance referenda be held every 6 years for fresh pears and processing pears. 14. Add the authority for the Committees to conduct post-harvest research, in addition to production research and promotion (including paid advertising). 15. Update several order provisions to make them more current. 16. Revise order provisions to reflect the two-committee structure being recommended for administration of the program. AMS also proposed to allow such changes as may be necessary to the order, if any of the proposed changes are adopted, so that all of the order’s provisions conform to the effectuated amendments. Upon the basis of evidence introduced at the hearing and the record thereof, the Administrator of AMS on January 5, 2005, filed with the Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, a Recommended Decision and Opportunity to File Written Exceptions thereto by February 14, 2005. No comments were filed. Small Business Consideration Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), AMS has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of business subject to such actions so that VerDate jul<14>2003 13:31 Mar 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders and amendments thereto are unique in that they are normally brought about through group action of essentially small entities for their own benefit. Thus, both the RFA and the Act are compatible with respect to small entities. Small agricultural producers have been defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA)(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000. Small agricultural service firms, which include handlers regulated under the order, are defined as those with annual receipts of less than $5,000,000. Interested persons were invited to present evidence at the hearing on the probable regulatory and informational impact of the proposed amendments to the order on small businesses. The record evidence is that most of the proposed amendments are designed to enhance industry efficiencies and reduce costs, thereby improving grower returns. The record indicates that there are approximately 1,850 pear growers in Oregon and Washington. Of that total, 1,345 growers report Bartlett or other summer/fall pear production, and 1,753 growers report winter pear production. Two-year average NASS figures (the 2002 crop year and preliminary figures for 2003) provides the following production profile for Washington and Oregon, respectively: bearing acres, 24,800 and 17,600; yield per acre, 16.8 tons and 11.8 tons; annual production, 417,500 tons and 207,500 tons. Total acres planted in pears for Washington and Oregon (including non-bearing acres) in 2002 were 26,586 and 22,822, respectively. Summing average Washington and Oregon pear acreage for 2002 and 2003, and dividing by the number of growers (1,850), the estimated average acreage per grower in the two-state area is 26.7 total acres and 22.9 bearing acres. According to the 1997 Agricultural Census, the average Oregon and Washington pear grower had approximately 23 and 15 total acres, respectively. The sum of average Washington and Oregon pear production for 2002 and 2003, divided by the number of growers, yields an estimated average production per grower in the two-state area of 338 tons (676,000 pounds). The average fresh market grower return for the two States has been between 20 and 22 cents per pound in recent years, and between 10 and 12 cents per pound for processing. Estimated 2-year average pear sales PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 revenue per grower in the production area is approximately $101,000, which is between 1⁄7 and 1⁄8 of the revenue that would qualify a grower to be a large grower according to the SBA definition (if based on pear sales alone). According to the hearing record, roughly 75 percent of the fresh pear producers in the States of Oregon and Washington qualify as small producers. One witness stated that a 1,000-acre farm represents the threshold between a small and a large producer (a substantially different definition from what the SBA uses). There are 55 handlers that handle fresh pears produced in Oregon and Washington; 73 percent of these fall into the SBA definition of ‘‘small business.’’ There are five processing plants in the production area, with one in Oregon and four in Washington. All five processors are larger than the SBA’s definition of small business. According to information presented by processors testifying at the hearing, roughly 90 percent of pears received for processing come from small grower entities. The proposals put forth at the hearing would streamline industry organization, but would not result in a significant change in industry production, harvest or distribution activities. In discussing the impacts of the proposed amendments on small growers and handlers, witnesses indicated that the changes are expected to result in lower costs. If implemented, the amendments would result in the consolidation of marketing orders 927 and 931, regulating fresh winter pears and summer/fall pears, respectively. Program coverage would also be extended to pears for processing. The combined programs would be administered by two new administrative committees, one for fresh pears and one for pears for processing. Cost savings could occur as a result of more efficient coordination of administrative activities between the two proposed committees. Record evidence indicates the proposal to revise the order’s inspection provisions may result in cost savings for handlers. Handlers within the production area typically have about 75 percent of their product inspected on a voluntary basis. The remaining 25 percent represents the amount of additional product that would be required to be inspected if regulations were in effect. Handler witnesses also reported that inspection costs average 121⁄2 cents per hundredweight, with a $9.00 minimum fee. In addition to paying the inspection fee, handlers may also experience delays in shipments while waiting for inspection to be completed. Handlers E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules indicated that such delays could be longer for smaller shippers that do not have inspectors regularly stationed at their warehouses. This proposal seeks to reduce these costs by allowing alternatives to mandatory inspection. Traditionally, the pear industry has used end-line inspection procedures. Under this scenario, samples of packed pears are examined at the end of the production process, and the results are certified by Federally licensed inspectors. The record shows that in recent years, the Federal-State Inspection Service has developed effective, less costly alternatives to the end-line inspection program. One alternative is the ‘‘Partners in Quality’’ program, a documented quality assurance system. Under this program, individual packing houses must demonstrate and document their ability to pack product that meets all relevant quality requirements. Effectiveness of the program is verified through periodic, unannounced audits of each packer’s system by USDA-approved auditors. Another program recently developed is the Customer Assisted Inspection Program (CAIP). Under CAIP, USDA inspectors oversee the in-line sampling and inspection process performed by trained company staff. USDA oversight ranges from periodic visits throughout the day to a continuous on-site presence. Witnesses at the hearing testified that the fresh pear industry should be able to utilize any method of inspection acceptable to the FederalState Inspection Service. These alternative methods have been developed by USDA as a means of reducing costs to industry. If this amendment were implemented, individual pear handlers could choose the method of inspection best suited to their operations, thereby possibly reducing costs associated with inspection. Additionally, the authority to eliminate inspection requirements could have handler cost implications. However, any increase or decrease in costs could not be determined until specific alternative methods are developed to assure compliance with any quality and size standards in effect. The proposal to authorize container marking requirements is not expected to result in significant cost increases for fresh pear handlers. Testimony indicated that packing facilities are already configured for labeling and container marking. Witnesses noted that there would be little, if any, need for equipment changes or additions. Thus, the proposed change is not expected to have any adverse financial impact VerDate jul<14>2003 13:31 Mar 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 related to handling fresh pears. It should be noted that the proposed amendment would only grant the committees authority to recommend container markings; implementation of this authority could be done through informal rulemaking in the future. The amendment itself would therefore not impose any new regulatory requirements on Oregon or Washington fresh pear handlers. Witnesses explained that the winter, summer/fall, fresh and processed pear industries are closely inter-related. Growing, harvesting, packing, processing and marketing activities of these industries all impact each other. Thus, bringing all industry segments together under a single marketing program would be beneficial for the Oregon and Washington pear industry. Proponent witnesses stated that the combined amendments, if implemented, would help to improve the orderly marketing of product within the industry. Similarly, coordinated marketing and distribution efforts for fresh varieties that appear in the marketplace simultaneously would assist in maximizing grower returns from each variety. While the industries currently undertake coordinated marketing and promotional activities, witnesses stated that combining these industries would further synchronize activities and facilitate industry discussions and decision-making. The amendments would add authority to assess summer/fall pear handlers and undertake promotional activities on their behalf in a manner similar to that done currently for winter pears. When asked if assuming this authority would be acceptable to the summer/fall pear industry, witnesses supported promotional activities, including paid generic advertising, as a way to boost sales and maintain market share. Post-harvest research would also benefit the pear industries by focusing on a section of the pear crop-to-market flow that, until now, has not benefited from research activities. Improved storage techniques resulting from industry-funded post-harvest research could benefit the pear industry by decreasing the loss of product due to storage, or by increasing the storability of product to help prolong the marketing season. A significant market-facilitating function carried out by the current marketing order committees is the collection of statistical data. That function would continue under the amended marketing order and the authority to collect information would extend to additional varieties that are PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 11157 currently produced. Flexibility is provided for including other varieties in the future. Witnesses emphasized the importance and value of collecting and disseminating accurate statistical information to enable industry participants to make economic and marketing decisions. The proposal to establish two administrative committees also includes the addition of a public member to each of those committees. The benefit of adding a non-industry, consumer perspective to committee deliberations and decision-making could prove very beneficial. Witnesses stated that this additional perspective would improve the committees’ understanding of the consumer in the marketplace and could enhance committee activities aimed at increasing consumer demand for Oregon and Washington pears. The addition of a public member to each committee is not expected to result in any substantial cost increases. While these members would be entitled to reimbursement for certain expenses allowed for under the order, this expense is neither different nor any more burdensome than the current reimbursement arrangement for committee members. Interested persons were invited to present evidence at the hearing on the probable regulatory and informational impact of the proposed amendments to the order on small entities. The record evidence is that most of the amendments are designed to reduce costs. While some of the proposals could impose some minimal costs, those costs would be outweighed by the benefits expected to accrue to the Oregon and Washington pear industry. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. The Department has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this proposed rule. These amendments are designed to enhance the administration and functioning of the marketing order to the benefit of the industry. Committee meetings regarding these proposals as well as the hearing dates were widely publicized throughout the winter pear industry, and all interested persons were invited to attend the meetings and the hearing and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. All Committee meetings and the hearing were public forums and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on these issues. E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1 11158 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules Current information collection requirements for part 927 are approved by OMB under OMB number 0581– 0089. Any changes in those requirements as a result of this proceeding would be submitted to OMB for approval. Witnesses stated that existing forms could be adequately modified to serve the needs of the proposed fresh and processed pear committees. While conforming changes to the forms would need to be made (such as changing the name of the committee), the functionality of the forms would remain the same. Therefore, there would be no modification to reporting and recordkeeping burdens generated from these proposed amendments. Civil Justice Reform The amendments to Marketing Agreement and Order 927 proposed herein have been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. They are not intended to have retroactive effect. If adopted, the proposed amendments would not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this proposal. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. Findings and Conclusions The material issues, findings and conclusions, rulings, and general findings and determinations included in the Recommended Decision set forth in the January 13, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 2520) are hereby approved and adopted. Marketing Agreement and Order Annexed hereto and made a part hereof is the document entitled ‘‘Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Winter Pears Grown in VerDate jul<14>2003 13:31 Mar 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 Oregon and Washington.’’ This document has been decided upon as the detailed and appropriate means of effectuating the foregoing findings and conclusions. It is hereby ordered, That this entire decision be published in the Federal Register. Referendum Order It is hereby directed that a referendum be conducted in accordance with the procedure for the conduct of referenda (7 CFR part 900.400 et seq.) to determine whether the annexed order amending the order regulating the handling of winter pears grown in Oregon and Washington is approved or favored by producers, as defined under the terms of the order, who during the representative period were engaged in the production of pears in the production area. The representative period for the conduct of such referendum is hereby determined to be July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004. The agent of the Secretary to conduct such referendum is hereby designated to be Susan Hiller and Gary Olson, Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW. Third Avenue, room 385, Portland, Oregon 97204; telephone (503) 326–2724. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 927 Marketing agreements, Winter pears, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: February 28, 2005. Barry L. Carpenter, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Winter Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington 1 Findings and Determinations The findings and determinations hereinafter set forth are supplementary to the findings and determinations which were previously made in connection with the issuance of the marketing agreement and order; and all said previous findings and determinations are hereby ratified and affirmed, except insofar as such findings and determinations may be in conflict with the findings and determinations set forth herein. 1 This order shall not become effective unless and until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and marketing orders have been met. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 (a) Findings and Determinations Upon the Basis of the Hearing Record. Pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure effective thereunder (7 CFR part 900), a public hearing was held upon the proposed amendments to the Marketing Agreement and Order No. 927 (7 CFR part 927), regulating the handling of winter pears grown in Oregon and Washington. Upon the basis of the evidence introduced at such hearing and the record thereof, it is found that: (1) The marketing agreement and order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further amended, and all of the terms and conditions thereof, would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act; (2) The marketing agreement and order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further amended, regulate the handling of pears grown in the production area in the same manner as, and are applicable only to, persons in the respective classes of commercial and industrial activity specified in the marketing agreement and order upon which a hearing has been held; (3) The marketing agreement and order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further amended, are limited in their application to the smallest regional production area which is practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared policy of the Act, and the issuance of several orders applicable to subdivisions of the production area would not effectively carry out the declared policy of the Act; (4) The marketing agreement and order, as amended, and as hereby proposed to be further amended, prescribe, insofar as practicable, such different terms applicable to different parts of the production area as are necessary to give due recognition to the differences in the production and marketing of pears grown in the production area; and (5) All handling of pears grown in the production area as defined in the marketing agreement and order, is in the current of interstate or foreign commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such commerce. Order Relative to Handling It is therefore ordered, That on and after the effective date hereof, all handling of pears grown in Oregon and Washington shall be in conformity to, and in compliance with, the terms and conditions of the said order as hereby proposed to be amended as follows: E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules The provisions of the proposed marketing agreement and order contained in the Recommended Decision issued by the Administrator on January 5, 2005, and published in the Federal Register on January 13, 2005, will be and are the terms and provisions of this order amending the order and are set forth in full herein. specifically defined in a regulation issued under this part. 7. Revise § 927.6 to read as follows: PART 927—PEARS GROWN IN OREGON AND WASHINGTON § 927.7 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 927 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 2. Revise the heading of part 927 to read as set forth above. 3. Revise § 927.1 to read as follows: § 927.1 Secretary. Secretary means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, or any officer or employee of the Department of Agriculture who has been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, the authority to act for the Secretary. 4. Revise § 927.3 to read as follows: § 927.3 Person. Person means an individual partnership, corporation, association, legal representative, or any other business unit. 5. Revise § 927.4 to read as follows: § 927.4 Pears. § 927.5 Size. Size means the number of pears which can be packed in a 44-pound net weight standard box or container equivalent, or as ‘‘size’’ means the greatest transverse diameter of the pear taken at right angles to a line running from the stem to the blossom end, or such other specifications more VerDate jul<14>2003 13:31 Mar 07, 2005 Handler is synonymous with shipper and means any person (except a common or contract carrier transporting pears owned by another person) who, as owner, agent, broker, or otherwise, ships or handles pears, or causes pears to be shipped or handled by rail, truck, boat, or any other means whatsoever. 9. Revise § 927.8 to read as follows: Douglas, Grant, Lincoln, and Spokane in the State of Washington, and all other counties in Washington lying north thereof. (4) Yakima District shall include all of the State of Washington, not included in the Wenatchee District or in the MidColumbia District. (b) For the purpose of committee representation, administration and application of provisions of this subpart as applicable to pears for processing, districts shall be defined as follows: (1) The State of Washington. (2) The State of Oregon. (c) The Secretary, upon recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee, may reestablish districts within the production area. 12. Revise § 927.13 to read as follows: § 927.8 § 927.13 § 927.6 Jkt 205001 Grower. Grower is synonymous with producer and means any person engaged in the production of pears, either as owner or as tenant. 8. Revise § 927.7 to read as follows: Handler. Ship or handle. Ship or handle means to sell, deliver, consign, transport or ship pears within the production area or between the production area and any point outside thereof, including receiving pears for processing: Provided, That the term ‘‘’handle’’’ shall not include the transportation of pear shipments within the production area from the orchard where grown to a packing facility located within the production area for preparation for market or delivery for processing. 10. Revise § 927.9 to read as follows: § 927.9 (a) Pears means and includes any and all varieties or subvarieties of pears with the genus Pyrus that are produced in the production area and are classified as: (1) Summer/fall pears including Bartlett and Starkrimson pears; (2) Winter pears including Beurre D’Anjou, Beurre Bosc, Doyenne du Comice, Concorde, Forelle, Winter Nelis, Packham, Seckel, and Taylor’s Gold pears; and (3) Other pears including any or all other varieties or subvarieties of pears not classified as summer/fall or winter pears. (b) The Fresh Pear Committee and/or the Processed Pear Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may recognize new or delete obsolete varieties or subvarieties for each category. 6. Revise § 927.5 to read as follows: 11159 Fiscal period. Fiscal period means the period beginning July 1 of any year and ending June 30 of the following year or such may be approved by the Secretary pursuant to a joint recommendation by the Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee. 11. Revise § 927.11 to read as follows: § 927.11 District. District means the applicable one of the following-described subdivisions of the production area covered by the provisions of this subpart: (a) For the purpose of committee representation, administration and application of provisions of this subpart as applicable to pears for the fresh market, districts shall be defined as follows: (1) Medford District shall include all the counties in the State of Oregon except for Hood River and Wasco counties. (2) Mid-Columbia District shall include Hood River and Wasco counties in the State of Oregon, and the counties of Skamania and Klickitat in the State of Washington. (3) Wenatchee District shall include the counties of King, Chelan, Okanogan, PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Subvariety. Subvariety means and includes any mutation, sport, or other derivation of any of the varieties covered in § 927.4 which is recognized by the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee and approved by the Secretary. Recognition of a subvariety shall include classification within a varietal group for the purposes of votes conducted under § 927.52. 13. Add a new § 927.14 to read as follows: § 927.14 Processor. Processor means any person who as owner, agent, broker, or otherwise, commercially processes pears in the production area. 14. Add a new § 927.15 to read as follows: § 927.15 Process. Process means to can, concentrate, freeze, dehydrate, press or puree pears, or in any other way convert pears commercially into a processed product. 15. Revise the undesignated center heading preceding § 927.20 to read as follows: Administrative Bodies 16. Revise § 927.20 to read as follows: § 927.20 Establishment and membership. There are hereby established two committees to administer the terms and provisions of this subpart as specifically provided in §§ 927.20 through 927.35: (a) A Fresh Pear Committee, consisting of 13 individual persons as its members is established to administer order provisions relating to the handling of pears for the fresh market. Six members of the Fresh Pear Committee shall be growers, six members shall be handlers, and one member shall represent the public. For each member E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1 11160 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules there shall be two alternates, designated as the ‘‘first alternate’’ and the ‘‘second alternate,’’ respectively. Each district shall be represented by one grower member and one handler member, except that the Mid-Columbia District and the Wenatchee District shall be represented by two grower members and two handler members. (b) A Processed Pear Committee consisting of 10 members is established to administer order provisions relating to the handling of pears for processing. Three members of the Processed Pear Committee shall be growers, three members shall be handlers, three members shall be processors, and one member shall represent the public. For each member there shall be two alternates, designated as the ‘‘first alternate’’ and the ‘‘second alternate,’’ respectively. District 1, the State of Washington, shall be represented by two grower members, two handler members and two processor members. District 2, the State of Oregon, shall be represented by one grower member, one handler member and one processor member. (c) The Secretary, upon recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may reapportion members among districts, may change the number of members and alternates, and may change the composition by changing the ratio of members, including their alternates. In recommending any such changes, the following shall be considered: (1) Shifts in pear acreage within districts and within the production area during recent years; (2) The importance of new pear production in its relation to existing districts; (3) The equitable relationship between membership and districts; (4) Economies to result for growers in promoting efficient administration due to redistricting or reapportionment of members within districts; and (5) Other relevant factors. 17. Revise § 927.21 to read as follows: § 927.21 Nomination and selection of members and their respective alternates. Grower members and their respective alternates for each district shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees elected by the growers in such district. Handler members and their respective alternates for each district shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees elected by the handlers in such district. Processor members and their respective alternates shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees elected by the processors. Public members for each committee shall be nominated by the VerDate jul<14>2003 13:31 Mar 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee, each independently, and selected by the Secretary. The Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee may, each independently, prescribe such additional qualifications, administrative rules and procedures for selection for each candidate as it deems necessary and as the Secretary approves. 18. Revise § 927.22 to read as follows: § 927.22 Meetings for election of nominees. (a) Nominations for members of the Fresh Pear Committee and their alternates shall be made at meetings of growers and handlers held in each of the districts designated in § 927.11 at such times and places designated by the Fresh Pear Committee. (b) Nominations for grower and handler members of the Processed Pear Committee and their alternates shall be made at meetings of growers and handlers held in each of the districts designated in § 927.11 at such times and places designated by the Processed Pear Committee. Nominations for processor members of the Processed Pear Committee and their alternates shall be made at a meeting of processors at such time and place designated by the Processed Pear Committee. 19. Revise § 927.23 to read as follows: § 927.23 Voting. Only growers in attendance at meetings for election of nominees shall participate in the nomination of grower members and their alternates, and only handlers in attendance at meetings for election of nominees shall participate in the nomination of handler members and their alternates, and only processors in attendance for election of nominees shall participate in the nomination of processor members and their alternates. A grower may participate only in the election held in the district in which he or she produces pears, and a handler may participate only in the election held in the district in which he or she handles pears. Each person may vote as a grower, handler or processor, but not a combination thereof. Each grower, handler and processor shall be entitled to cast one vote, on behalf of himself, his agents, partners, affiliates, subsidiaries, and representatives, for each nominee to be elected. 20. Revise § 927.24 to read as follows: § 927.24 Eligibility for membership. Each grower member and each of his or her alternates shall be a grower, or an officer or employee of a corporate or LLC grower, who grows pears in the district in which and for which he or she is nominated and selected. Each PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 handler member and each of his or her alternates shall be a handler, or an officer or employee of a handler, handling pears in the district in and for which he or she is nominated and selected. Each processor member and each of their alternates shall be a processor, or an officer or employee of a processor, who processes pears in the production area. 21. Revise § 927.26 to read as follows: § 927.26 Qualifications. Any person prior to or within 15 days after selection as a member or as an alternate for a member of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee shall qualify by filing with the Secretary a written acceptance of the person’s willingness to serve. 22. Revise § 927.27 to read as follows: § 927.27 Term of office. The term of office of each member and alternate member of the Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee shall be for two years beginning July 1 and ending June 30: Provided, That the terms of office of one-half the initial members and alternates shall end June 30, 2006; and that beginning with the 2005–2006 fiscal period, no member shall serve more than three consecutive two-year terms unless specifically exempted by the Secretary. Members and alternate members shall serve in such capacities for the portion of the term of office for which they are selected and have qualified and until their respective successors are selected and have qualified. The terms of office of successor members and alternates shall be so determined that one-half of the total committee membership ends each June 30. 23. Revise § 927.28 to read as follows: § 927.28 Alternates for members. The first alternate for a member shall act in the place and stead of the member for whom he or she is an alternate during such member’s absence. In the event of the death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of a member, his or her first alternate shall act as a member until a successor for the member is selected and has qualified. The second alternate for a member shall serve in the place and stead of the member for whom he or she is an alternate whenever both the member and his or her first alternate are unable to serve. In the event that a member of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee and both that member’s alternates are unable to attend a meeting, the member may designate any other alternate member from the same E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules group (handler, processor, or grower) to serve in that member’s place and stead. 24. Revise § 927.29 to read as follows: § 927.29 Vacancies. To fill any vacancy occasioned by the failure of any person selected as a member or as an alternate for a member of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee to qualify, or in the event of death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of any qualified member or qualified alternate for a member, a successor for his or her unexpired term shall be nominated and selected in the manner set forth in §§ 927.20 to 927.35. If nominations to fill any such vacancy are not made within 20 days after such vacancy occurs, the Secretary may fill such vacancy without regard to nominations. 25. Revise § 927.30 to read as follows: § 927.30 Compensation and expenses. The members and alternates for members shall serve without compensation, but may be reimbursed for expenses necessarily incurred by them in the performance of their respective duties. 26. Revise § 927.31 to read as follows: § 927.31 Powers. The Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee shall have the following powers to exercise each independently: (a) To administer, as specifically provided in §§ 927.20 to 927.35, the terms and provisions of this subpart: (b) To make administrative rules and regulations in accordance with, and to effectuate, the terms and provisions of this subpart; and (c) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints of violations of the provisions of this subpart. 27. Revise § 927.32 to read as follows: § 927.32 Duties. The duties of the Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee, each independently, shall be as follows: (a) To act as intermediary between the Secretary and any grower, handler or processor; (b) To keep minutes, books, and records which will reflect clearly all of the acts and transactions. The minutes, books, and records shall be subject at any time to examination by the Secretary or by such person as may be designated by the Secretary; (c) To investigate, from time to time, and to assemble data on the growing, harvesting, shipping, and marketing conditions relative to pears, and to furnish to the Secretary such available information as may be requested; VerDate jul<14>2003 13:31 Mar 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 (d) To perform such duties as may be assigned to it from time to time by the Secretary in connection with the administration of section 32 of the Act to amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act, and for other purposes, Public Act No. 320, 74th Congress, approved August 24, 1935 (49 Stat. 774), as amended; (e) To cause the books to be audited by one or more competent accountants at the end of each fiscal year and at such other times as the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may deem necessary or as the Secretary may request, and to file with the Secretary copies of any and all audit reports made; (f) To appoint such employees agents, and representatives as it may deem necessary, and to determine the compensation and define the duties of each; (g) To give the Secretary, or the designated agent of the Secretary, the same notice of meetings as is given to the members of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee; (h) To select a chairman of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee and, from time to time, such other officers as it may deem advisable and to define the duties of each; and (i) To submit to the Secretary as soon as practicable after the beginning of each fiscal period, a budget for such fiscal year, including a report in explanation of the items appearing therein and a recommendation as to the rate of assessment for such period. 28. Revise § 927.33 to read as follows: § 927.33 Procedure. (a) Quorum and voting. A quorum at a meeting of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee shall consist of 75 percent of the number of committee members, or alternates then serving in the place of any members, respectively. Except as otherwise provided in § 927.52, all decisions of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee at any meeting shall require the concurring vote of at least 75 percent of those members present, including alternates then serving in the place of any members. (b) Mail voting. The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may provide for members voting by mail, telecopier or other electronic means, telephone, or telegraph, upon due notice to all members. Promptly after voting by telephone or telegraph, each member thus voting shall confirm in writing, the vote so cast. 29. Revise § 927.34 to read as follows: PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 § 927.34 11161 Right of the Secretary. The members and alternates for members and any agent or employee appointed or employed by the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee shall be subject to removal or suspension by the Secretary at any time. Each and every regulation, decision, determination, or other act shall be subject to the continuing right of the Secretary to disapprove of the same at any time, and, upon such disapproval, shall be deemed null and void, except as to acts done in reliance thereon or in compliance therewith prior to such disapproval by the Secretary. 30. Revise § 927.35 to read as follows: § 927.35 Funds and other property. (a) All funds received pursuant to any of the provisions of this subpart shall be used solely for the purposes specified in this subpart, and the Secretary may require the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee and its members to account for all receipts and disbursements. (b) Upon the death, resignation, removal, disqualification, or expiration of the term of office of any member or employee, all books, records, funds, and other property in his or her possession belonging to the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee shall be delivered to his or her successor in office or to the Fresh Pear Committee or Processed Pear Committee, and such assignments and other instruments shall be executed as may be necessary to vest in such successor or in the Fresh Pear Committee or Processed Pear Committee full title to all the books, records, funds, and other property in the possession or under the control of such member or employee pursuant to this subpart. 31. Remove § 927.36, Public advisors. 32. Revise § 927.40 to read as follows: § 927.40 Expenses. The Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee are authorized, each independently, to incur such expenses as the Secretary finds may be necessary to carry out their functions under this subpart. The funds to cover such expenses shall be acquired by the levying of assessments as provided in § 927.41. 33. Revise § 927.41 to read as follows: § 927.41 Assessments. (a) Assessments will be levied only upon handlers who first handle pears. Each handler shall pay assessments on all pears handled by such handler as the pro rata share of the expenses which the Secretary finds are reasonable and likely to be incurred by the Fresh Pear E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1 11162 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules Committee or the Processed Pear Committee during a fiscal period. The payment of assessments for the maintenance and functioning of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may be required under this part throughout the period such assessments are payable irrespective of whether particular provisions thereof are suspended or become inoperative. (b)(1) Based upon a recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee or other available data, the Secretary shall fix three base rates of assessment for pears that handlers shall pay on pears handled for the fresh market during each fiscal period. Such base rates shall include one rate of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears classified as summer/fall; one rate of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears, classified as winter; and one rate of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears classified as other. Upon recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee or other available data, the Secretary may also fix supplemental rates of assessment on individual varieties or subvarieties categorized within the above-defined assessment classifications to secure sufficient funds to provide for projects authorized under § 927.47. At any time during the fiscal period when it is determined on the basis of a Fresh Pear Committee recommendation or other information that different rates are necessary for fresh pears or for any varieties or subvarieties, the Secretary may modify those rates of assessment and such new rate shall apply to any or all varieties or subvarieties that are shipped during the fiscal period for fresh market. (2) Based upon a recommendation of the Processed Pear Committee or other available data, the Secretary shall fix three base rates of assessment for pears that handlers shall pay on pears handled for processing during each fiscal period. Such base rates shall include one rate of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears classified as summer/fall; one rate of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears, classified as winter; and one rate of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears classified as other. Upon recommendation of the Processed Pear Committee or other available data, the Secretary may also fix supplemental rates of assessment on individual varieties or subvarieties categorized within the above-defined assessment classifications to secure sufficient funds to provide for projects authorized under § 927.47. At any time during the fiscal period when it is determined on the VerDate jul<14>2003 13:31 Mar 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 basis of a Processed Pear Committee recommendation or other information that different rates are necessary for pears for processing or for any varieties or subvarieties, the Secretary may modify those rates of assessment and such new rate shall apply to any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears that are shipped during the fiscal period for processing. (c) Based on the recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee, the Processed Pear Committee or other available data, the Secretary may establish additional base rates of assessments, or change or modify the base rate classifications defined in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. (d) The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may impose a late payment charge on any handler who fails to pay any assessment within the time prescribed. In the event the handler thereafter fails to pay the amount outstanding, including the late payment charge, within the prescribed time, the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may impose an additional charge in the form of interest on such outstanding amount. The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, shall prescribe the amount of such late payment charge and rate of interest. (e) In order to provide funds to carry out the functions of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee prior to commencement of shipments in any season, handlers may make advance payments of assessments, which advance payments shall be credited to such handlers and the assessments of such handlers shall be adjusted so that such assessments are based upon the quantity of each variety or subvariety of pears handled by such handlers during such season. Further, payment discounts may be authorized by the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee upon the approval of the Secretary to handlers making such advance assessment payments. 34. Revise § 927.42 to read as follows: § 927.42 Accounting. (a) If, at the end of a fiscal period, the assessments collected are in excess of expenses incurred, the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may carryover such excess into subsequent fiscal periods as a reserve: Provided, That funds already in the reserve do not exceed approximately one fiscal period’s expenses. Such reserve may be used to cover any expense authorized under this part and to cover necessary expenses of PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 liquidation in the event of termination of this part. Any such excess not retained in a reserve or applied to any outstanding obligation of the person from whom it was collected shall be refunded proportionately to the persons from whom it was collected. Upon termination of this part, any funds not required to defray the necessary expenses of liquidation shall be disposed of in such manner as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate: Provided, That to the extent practical, such funds shall be returned pro rata to the persons from whom such funds were collected. (b) All funds received pursuant to the provisions of this part shall be used solely for the purpose specified in this part and shall be accounted for in the manner provided in this part. The Secretary may at any time require the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee and its members to account for all receipts and disbursements. 35. Revise § 927.43 to read as follows: § 927.43 Use of funds. From the funds acquired pursuant to § 927.41 the Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee, each independently, shall pay the salaries of its employees, if any, and pay the expenses necessarily incurred in the performance of the duties of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee. 36. Remove § 927.44, Collection of unpaid assessments. 37. Revise § 927.45 to read as follows: § 927.45 Contributions. The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may accept voluntary contributions but these shall only be used to pay expenses incurred pursuant to § 927.47. Furthermore, such contributions shall be free from any encumbrances by the donor and the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee shall retain complete control of their use. 38. Revise § 927.47 to read as follows: § 927.47 Research and development. The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish or provide for the establishment of production and post-harvest research, or marketing research and development projects designed to assist, improve, or promote the marketing, distribution, and consumption of pears. Such projects may provide for any form of marketing promotion, including paid advertising. The expense of such projects shall be paid from funds E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules collected pursuant to §§ 927.41 and 927.45. Expenditures for a particular variety or subvariety of pears shall approximate the amount of assessments and voluntary contributions collected for that variety or subvariety of pears. 39. Revise § 927.50 to read as follows: § 927.50 Marketing policy. (a) It shall be the duty of the Fresh Pear Committee to investigate, from time to time, supply and demand conditions relative to pears and each grade, size, and quality of each variety or subvariety thereof. Such investigations shall be with respect to the following: (1) Estimated production of each variety or subvariety of pears and of each grade, size, and quality thereof; (2) Prospective supplies and prices of pears and other fruits, both in fresh and processed form, which are competitive to the marketing of pears; (3) Prospective exports of pears and imports of pears from other producing areas; (4) Probable harvesting period for each variety or subvariety of pears; (5) The trend and level of consumer income; (6) General economic conditions; and (7) Other relevant factors. (b) On or before August 1 of each year, the Fresh Pear Committee shall recommend regulations to the Secretary if it finds, on the basis of the foregoing investigations, that such regulation as is provided in § 927.51 will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act. (c) In the event the Fresh Pear Committee at any time finds that by reason of changed conditions any regulation issued pursuant to § 927.51 should be modified, suspended, or terminated, it shall so recommend to the Secretary. 40. Revise § 927.51 to read as follows: § 927.51 Issuance of regulations; and modification, suspension, or termination thereof. (a) Whenever the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and information submitted by the Fresh Pear Committee, or from other available information, that regulation, in the manner specified in this section, of the shipment of fresh pears would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act, he or she shall so limit the shipment of such pears during a specified period or periods. Such regulation may: (1) Limit the total quantity of any grade, size, quality, or combinations thereof, of any variety or subvariety of pears grown in any district and may prescribe different requirements applicable to shipments to different export markets; VerDate jul<14>2003 13:31 Mar 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 (2) Limit, during any period or periods, the shipment of any particular grade, size, quality, or any combination thereof, of any variety or subvariety, of pears grown in any district or districts of the production area; and (3) Provide a method, through rules and regulation issued pursuant to this part, for fixing markings on the container or containers, which may be used in the packaging or handling of pears, including appropriate logo or other container markings to identify the contents thereof. (b) Whenever the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and information submitted by the Fresh Pear Committee, or from other available information, that a regulation should be modified, suspended, or terminated with respect to any or all shipments of fresh pears grown in any district in order to effectuate the declared policy of the act, he or she shall so modify, suspend, or terminate such regulation. If the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and information submitted by the Fresh Pear Committee, or from other available information, that a regulation obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act, he or she shall suspend or terminate such regulation. On the same basis and in like manner, the Secretary may terminate any such modification or suspension. 41. Revise § 927.52 to read as follows: § 927.52 Prerequisites to recommendations. (a) Decisions of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee with respect to any recommendations to the Secretary pursuant to the establishment or modification of a supplemental rate of assessment for an individual variety or subvariety of pears shall be made by affirmative vote of not less than 75 percent of the applicable total number of votes, computed in the manner hereinafter described in this section, of all members. Decisions of the Fresh Pear Committee pursuant to the provisions of § 927.50 shall be made by an affirmative vote of not less than 80 percent of the applicable total number of votes, computed in the manner hereinafter prescribed in this section, of all members. (b) With respect to a particular variety or subvariety of pears, the applicable total number of votes shall be the aggregate of the votes allotted to the members in accordance with the following: Each member shall have one vote as an individual and, in addition, shall have a vote equal to the percentage of the vote of the district represented by PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 11163 such member; and such district vote shall be computed as soon as practical after the beginning of each fiscal period on either: (1) The basis of one vote for each 25,000 boxes (except 2,500 boxes for varieties or subvarieties with less than 200,000 standard boxes or container equivalents) of the average quantity of such variety or subvariety produced in the particular district and shipped therefrom during the immediately preceding three fiscal periods; or (2) Such other basis as the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may recommend and the Secretary may approve. The votes so allotted to a member may be cast by such member on each recommendation relative to the variety or subvariety of pears on which such votes were computed. 42. Revise § 927.53 to read as follows: § 927.53 Notification. (a) The Fresh Pear Committee shall give prompt notice to growers and handlers of each recommendation to the Secretary pursuant to the provisions of § 927.50. (b) The Secretary shall immediately notify the Fresh Pear Committee of the issuance of each regulation and of each modification, suspension, or termination of a regulation and the Fresh Pear Committee shall give prompt notice thereof to growers and handlers. 42a. Remove § 927.54, Exemption certificates. 43. Amend § 927.60 by revising paragraph (a) and adding a new paragraph (c) to read as follows: § 927.60 Inspection and certification. (a) Handlers shall ship only fresh pears inspected by the Federal-State Inspection Service or under a program developed by the Federal-State Inspection Service: except, that such inspection and certification of shipments of pears may be performed by such other inspection service as the Fresh Pear Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may designate. Promptly after shipment of any pears, the handler shall submit, or cause to be submitted, to the Fresh Pear Committee a copy of the inspection certificate issued on such shipment. * * * * * (c) The Fresh Pear Committee may, with the approval of the Secretary, prescribe rules and regulations modifying or eliminating the requirement for mandatory inspection and certification of shipments: Provided, That an adequate method of ensuring compliance with quality and size requirements is developed. E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1 11164 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules 44. Revise § 927.65 to read as follows: § 927.65 Exemption from regulation. (a) Nothing contained in this subpart shall limit or authorize the limitation of shipment of pears for consumption by charitable institutions or distribution by relief agencies, nor shall any assessment be computed on pears so shipped. The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may prescribe regulations to prevent pears shipped for either of such purposes from entering commercial channels of trade contrary to the provisions of this subpart. (b) The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may prescribe rules and regulations, to become effective upon the approval of the Secretary, whereby quantities of pears or types of pear shipments may be exempted from any or all provisions of this subpart. 45. Revise § 927.70 to read as follows: § 927.70 Reports. (a) Upon the request of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee, and subject to the approval of the Secretary, each handler shall furnish to the aforesaid committee, respectively, in such manner and at such times as it prescribes, such information as will enable it to perform its duties under this subpart. (b) All such reports shall be held under appropriate protective classification and custody by the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee, or duly appointed employees thereof, so that the information contained therein which may adversely affect the competitive position of any handler in relation to other handlers will not be disclosed. Compilations of general reports from data submitted by handlers are authorized subject to the prohibition of disclosure of individual handler’s identities or operations. (c) Each handler shall maintain for at least two succeeding years such records of the pears received and of pears disposed of, by such handler as may be necessary to verify reports pursuant to this section. 46. Revise § 927.75 to read as follows: § 927.75 Liability. No member or alternate for a member of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee, nor any employee or agent thereof, shall be held personally responsible, either individually or jointly with others, in any way whatsoever, to any party under this subpart or to any other person for errors in judgment, mistakes, or other acts, either of commission or omission, VerDate jul<14>2003 13:31 Mar 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 as such member, alternate for a member, agent or employee, except for acts of dishonesty, willful misconduct, or gross negligence. 47. Revise § 927.76 to read as follows: § 927.76 Agents. The Secretary may name, by designation in writing, any person, including any officer or employee of the Government or any bureau or division in the Department of Agriculture to act as his or her agent or representative in connection with any of the provisions of this subpart. 48. Revise § 927.77 to read as follows: § 927.77 Effective time. The provisions of this subpart and of any amendment thereto shall become effective at such time as the Secretary may declare, and shall continue in force until terminated in one of the ways specified in § 927.78. 49. Amend § 927.78 by revising paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) to read as follows: § 927.78 Termination. * * * * * (b) The Secretary shall terminate or suspend the operation of any or all of the provisions of this subpart whenever he or she finds that such operation obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act. (c) The Secretary shall terminate the provisions of this subpart applicable to fresh pears for market or pears for processing at the end of any fiscal period whenever the Secretary finds, by referendum or otherwise, that such termination is favored by a majority of growers of fresh pears for market or pears for processing, respectively: Provided, That such majority has during such period produced more than 50 percent of the volume of fresh pears for market or pears for processing, respectively, in the production area. Such termination shall be effective only if announced on or before the last day of the then current fiscal period. (d) The Secretary shall conduct a referendum within every six-year period beginning on the date this section becomes effective, to ascertain whether continuance of the provisions of this subpart applicable to fresh pears for market or pears for processing are favored by producers of pears for the fresh market and pears for processing, respectively. The Secretary may terminate the provisions of this subpart at the end of any fiscal period in which the Secretary has found that continuance of this subpart is not favored by producers who, during a representative period determined by the PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Secretary, have been engaged in the production of fresh pears for market or pears for processing in the production area: Provided, That termination of the order shall be effective only if announced on or before the last day of the then current fiscal period. * * * * * 50. Revise § 927.79 to read as follows: § 927.79 Proceedings after termination. (a) Upon the termination of this subpart, the members of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee then functioning shall continue as joint trustees for the purpose of liquidating all funds and property then in the possession or under the control of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not delivered at the time of such termination. (b) The joint trustees shall continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary; from time to time account for all receipts and disbursements; deliver all funds and property on hand, together with all books and records of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee and of the joint trustees, to such person as the Secretary shall direct; and, upon the request of the Secretary, execute such assignments or other instruments necessary and appropriate to vest in such person full title and right to all of the funds, property, or claims vested in the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee or in said joint trustees. (c) Any funds collected pursuant to this subpart and held by such joint trustees or such person over and above the amounts necessary to meet outstanding obligations and the expenses necessarily incurred by the joint trustees or such other person in the performance of their duties under this subpart, as soon as practicable after the termination hereof, shall be returned to the handlers pro rata in proportion to their contributions thereto. (d) Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered by the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee or its members, upon direction of the Secretary, as provided in this section, shall be subject to the same obligations and duties with respect to said funds, property, or claims as are imposed upon the members or upon said joint trustees. 51. Revise § 927.80 to read as follows: § 927.80 Amendments. Amendments to this subpart may be proposed from time to time by the Fresh E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee or by the Secretary. [FR Doc. 05–4306 Filed 3–7–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2005–20511; Directorate Identifier 2004–SW–32–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Agusta S.p.A. Model A109E Helicopters Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: This document proposes adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model A109E helicopters. This proposal would require, within 5 hours time-in-service (TIS), locating relay K7212 and its associated cable in the overhead panel assembly and visually inspecting the electrical cable in the splice area for arcing or burns. If arcing or burns are found, this proposal would require, before further flight, replacing an unairworthy cable with an airworthy cable kit. This proposal is prompted by an overhead panel inspection report of incorrect crimping of the pins on the cable that connects to the relay. An electrical cable fault during assembly could result in arcing or burning of the cable junction at a relay in the overhead electrical panel. The actions specified by this proposed AD are intended to detect arcing or burns of the cable or relay and to prevent burning of the cable junction at a relay, a fire in the cockpit, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. SUMMARY: Comments must be received on or before May 9, 2005. ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on this proposed AD: • DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically; • Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically; • Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590; DATES: VerDate jul<14>2003 13:31 Mar 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 • Fax: (202) 493–2251; or • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may get the service information identified in this proposed AD from Agusta, 21017 Cascina Costa di Samarate (VA) Italy, Via Giovanni Agusta 520, telephone 39 (0331) 229111, fax 39 (0331) 229605–222595. You may examine the comments to this proposed AD in the AD docket on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carroll Wright, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations and Guidance Group, Fort Worth, Texas 76193–0111, telephone (817) 222–5120, fax (817) 222–5961. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to submit any written data, views, or arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to the address listed under the caption ADDRESSES. Include the docket number ‘‘FAA–2005–20511, Directorate Identifier 2004–SW–32–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD in light of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https:// dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Using the search function of our docket Web site, you can find and read the comments to any of our dockets, including the name of the individual who sent or signed the comment. You may review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78), or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov. Examining the Docket You may examine the docket that contains the proposed AD, any comments, and other information in person at the Docket Management System (DMS) Docket Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1–800–647– 5227) is located at the plaza level of the Department of Transportation NASSIF PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 11165 Building in Room PL–401 at 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after the DMS receives them. Discussion Ente Nazionale per l’Aiazione Civile (ENAC), the airworthiness authority for Italy, notified the FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on Agusta Model A109E helicopters. ENAC advises carrying out the controls and modification called for by Agusta Bollettino Tecnico No. 109EP–22, dated November 12, 2001 (BT 109EP–22). Agusta has issued BT 109EP–22, which specifies visually inspecting the cable for the possible presence of arcing or burns. If the presence of arcing or burns are found, the BT specifies modifying the direct current electrical system bus bar connections with a kit, P/N 109–0823–01–101. ENAC classified this service bulletin as mandatory and issued AD No. 2001– 481, dated November 13, 2001, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these helicopters in Italy. This helicopter model is manufactured in Italy and is type certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.29 and the applicable bilateral agreement. Pursuant to the applicable bilateral agreement, Italy has kept us informed of the situation described above. We have examined the findings of ENAC, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for operation in the United States. This previously described unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of the same type design registered in the United States. Therefore, the proposed AD would require, within 5 hours TIS, visually inspecting the cable, P/N 109–0753–10, for arcing and burns in the splice area where it connects to relay K7212. If no arcing or burns are found, no further action would be required. If arcing or burns are found, this AD would require, before further flight, replacing the cable with an airworthy cable kit, P/N 109– 0823–01–101, and testing the electrical system. The actions would be required to be done by following the service bulletin described previously. We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 12 helicopters of U.S. registry. The proposed actions would take about 1/2 work hour to visually inspect and 2.5 work hours to replace the cable per helicopter at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Required parts would cost about $707. E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM 08MRP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 8, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11155-11165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4306]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 11155]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 927

[Docket No. AO-F&V-927-A1; FV04-927-1 PR]


Winter Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Secretary's Decision 
and Referendum Order on Proposed Amendments to Marketing Agreement and 
Order No. 927

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This decision proposes amending the marketing agreement and 
order (order) for winter pears grown in Oregon and Washington, and 
provides producers with the opportunity to vote in a referendum to 
determine if they favor the changes. The amendments are based on 
recommendations jointly proposed by the Winter Pear Control Committee 
and the Northwest Fresh Bartlett Marketing Committee, which are 
responsible for local administration of orders 927 and 931, 
respectively. Marketing Agreement and Order No. 931 regulates the 
handling of fresh Bartlett pears grown in Oregon and Washington. The 
amendments would combine the winter pear and fresh Bartlett orders into 
a single program under marketing order 927, and would add authority to 
assess pears for processing. All of the proposals are intended to 
streamline industry organization and improve the administration, 
operation, and functioning of the program.

DATES: The referendum will be conducted from March 22 through April 8, 
2005. The representative period for the purpose of the referendum is 
July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Schmaedick, Marketing Order 
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural 
Marketing Service, USDA, Post Office Box 1035, Moab, UT 84532, 
telephone: (435) 259-7988, fax: (435) 259-4945.
    Small businesses may request information on this proceeding by 
contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit 
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop 
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; telephone: (202) 720-2491, fax: (202) 
720-8938.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior documents in this proceeding: Notice 
of Hearing issued on March 24, 2004, and published in the March 30, 
2004, issue of the Federal Register (69 FR 16501), and a Recommended 
Decision issued on January 5, 2005, and published in the January 13, 
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 2520).
    This action is governed by the provisions of sections 556 and 557 
of title 5 of the United States Code and is therefore excluded from the 
requirements of Executive Order 12866.

Preliminary Statement

    The amendments are based on the record of a public hearing held on 
April 13 and 14, 2004, in Yakima, Washington and on April 16, 2004, in 
Portland, Oregon. The hearing was held to consider the proposed 
amendment of Marketing Agreement and Order No. 927, regulating the 
handling of winter pears grown in the States of Oregon and Washington, 
hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
    The hearing was held pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural 
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), 
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act,'' and the applicable rules of 
practice and procedure governing the formulation of marketing 
agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR part 900).
    Notice of this hearing was published in the Federal Register on 
March 30, 2004 (69 FR 16501). The notice of hearing contained order 
changes proposed by both the Winter Pear Control Committee and the 
Northwest Fresh Bartlett Marketing Committee, which are responsible for 
local administration of orders 927 and 931, respectively. Marketing 
order 927 regulates the handling of winter pears grown in Oregon and 
Washington. Marketing order 931 regulates the handling of Bartlett 
pears in the same production area.
    The amendments included in this decision would:
    1. Expand the definition of ``pears'' to include all varieties of 
pears classified as summer/fall pears in addition to winter pears; add 
Concorde, Packham, and Taylor's Gold pears to the current list of 
winter pear varieties; and add a third category of pears which would 
include varieties not classified as summer/fall or winter pears. This 
amendment would extend program coverage to all pears grown in Oregon 
and Washington.
    2. Revise the definition of ``size'' to include language currently 
used within the industry.
    3. Extend the order's coverage to pears for processing by revising 
the definition of ``handle,'' and adding definitions of ``processor'' 
and ``process.''
    4. Establish districts for pears for processing. This amendment 
would divide the order's production area into two districts for pears 
for processing: one being the State of Oregon and the other being the 
State of Washington.
    5. Dissolve the current Winter Pear Control Committee and establish 
two new administrative committees: The Fresh Pear Committee and the 
Processed Pear Committee (Committees). This proposal would add a public 
member and public alternate member seat to both of the newly 
established Committees and would remove Section 927.36, Public 
advisors. The Committees would coordinate administration of Marketing 
Order 927, with each Committee recommending assessments and 
administering program functions specific to their commodity. 
Coordinated administration would allow each Committee to make decisions 
on behalf of the commodity they represent, yet combine administrative 
functions, when applicable, to maximize efficiencies and minimize 
program costs.
    Additionally, related changes would be made to order provisions 
governing nomination and selection of members and their alternates, 
terms of office, eligibility for membership, and quorum and voting 
requirements, to reflect the proposed dual committee structure.
    6. Authorize changes in the number of Committee members and 
alternates, and allowing reapportionment of committee membership among 
districts and groups (i.e., growers, handlers, and processors). Such 
changes would require a Committee recommendation and approval by the 
Department.

[[Page 11156]]

    7. Add authority to establish assessment rates for each category of 
pears, including: summer/fall pears, winter pears, and all other pears. 
In addition, rates of assessment could be different for fresh pears and 
pears for processing in each category, and could include supplemental 
rates on individual varieties.
    8. Add authority for container marking requirements for fresh 
pears.
    9. Remove the order provision allowing grower exemptions from 
regulation. This is a tool no longer used by the industry and, thus, is 
considered obsolete.
    10. Amend Sec.  927.70, Reports, to update order language regarding 
confidentiality requirements to conform to language under the Act.
    11. Clarify inspection requirements and adding authority to 
eliminate those requirements if an alternative, adequate method of 
ensuring compliance with quality and size standards in effect under the 
order can be developed.
    12. Eliminate the current exemptions for pears for processing and 
for pears shipped to storage warehouses.
    13. Provide that separate continuance referenda be held every 6 
years for fresh pears and processing pears.
    14. Add the authority for the Committees to conduct post-harvest 
research, in addition to production research and promotion (including 
paid advertising).
    15. Update several order provisions to make them more current.
    16. Revise order provisions to reflect the two-committee structure 
being recommended for administration of the program.
    AMS also proposed to allow such changes as may be necessary to the 
order, if any of the proposed changes are adopted, so that all of the 
order's provisions conform to the effectuated amendments.
    Upon the basis of evidence introduced at the hearing and the record 
thereof, the Administrator of AMS on January 5, 2005, filed with the 
Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, a Recommended Decision 
and Opportunity to File Written Exceptions thereto by February 14, 
2005. No comments were filed.

Small Business Consideration

    Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (RFA), AMS has considered the economic impact of this 
action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final 
regulatory flexibility analysis.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
business subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be 
unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders and amendments 
thereto are unique in that they are normally brought about through 
group action of essentially small entities for their own benefit. Thus, 
both the RFA and the Act are compatible with respect to small entities.
    Small agricultural producers have been defined by the Small 
Business Administration (SBA)(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual 
receipts of less than $750,000. Small agricultural service firms, which 
include handlers regulated under the order, are defined as those with 
annual receipts of less than $5,000,000.
    Interested persons were invited to present evidence at the hearing 
on the probable regulatory and informational impact of the proposed 
amendments to the order on small businesses. The record evidence is 
that most of the proposed amendments are designed to enhance industry 
efficiencies and reduce costs, thereby improving grower returns.
    The record indicates that there are approximately 1,850 pear 
growers in Oregon and Washington. Of that total, 1,345 growers report 
Bartlett or other summer/fall pear production, and 1,753 growers report 
winter pear production. Two-year average NASS figures (the 2002 crop 
year and preliminary figures for 2003) provides the following 
production profile for Washington and Oregon, respectively: bearing 
acres, 24,800 and 17,600; yield per acre, 16.8 tons and 11.8 tons; 
annual production, 417,500 tons and 207,500 tons. Total acres planted 
in pears for Washington and Oregon (including non-bearing acres) in 
2002 were 26,586 and 22,822, respectively.
    Summing average Washington and Oregon pear acreage for 2002 and 
2003, and dividing by the number of growers (1,850), the estimated 
average acreage per grower in the two-state area is 26.7 total acres 
and 22.9 bearing acres. According to the 1997 Agricultural Census, the 
average Oregon and Washington pear grower had approximately 23 and 15 
total acres, respectively. The sum of average Washington and Oregon 
pear production for 2002 and 2003, divided by the number of growers, 
yields an estimated average production per grower in the two-state area 
of 338 tons (676,000 pounds).
    The average fresh market grower return for the two States has been 
between 20 and 22 cents per pound in recent years, and between 10 and 
12 cents per pound for processing. Estimated 2-year average pear sales 
revenue per grower in the production area is approximately $101,000, 
which is between \1/7\ and \1/8\ of the revenue that would qualify a 
grower to be a large grower according to the SBA definition (if based 
on pear sales alone). According to the hearing record, roughly 75 
percent of the fresh pear producers in the States of Oregon and 
Washington qualify as small producers. One witness stated that a 1,000-
acre farm represents the threshold between a small and a large producer 
(a substantially different definition from what the SBA uses).
    There are 55 handlers that handle fresh pears produced in Oregon 
and Washington; 73 percent of these fall into the SBA definition of 
``small business.'' There are five processing plants in the production 
area, with one in Oregon and four in Washington. All five processors 
are larger than the SBA's definition of small business. According to 
information presented by processors testifying at the hearing, roughly 
90 percent of pears received for processing come from small grower 
entities.
    The proposals put forth at the hearing would streamline industry 
organization, but would not result in a significant change in industry 
production, harvest or distribution activities. In discussing the 
impacts of the proposed amendments on small growers and handlers, 
witnesses indicated that the changes are expected to result in lower 
costs.
    If implemented, the amendments would result in the consolidation of 
marketing orders 927 and 931, regulating fresh winter pears and summer/
fall pears, respectively. Program coverage would also be extended to 
pears for processing. The combined programs would be administered by 
two new administrative committees, one for fresh pears and one for 
pears for processing. Cost savings could occur as a result of more 
efficient coordination of administrative activities between the two 
proposed committees.
    Record evidence indicates the proposal to revise the order's 
inspection provisions may result in cost savings for handlers. Handlers 
within the production area typically have about 75 percent of their 
product inspected on a voluntary basis. The remaining 25 percent 
represents the amount of additional product that would be required to 
be inspected if regulations were in effect.
    Handler witnesses also reported that inspection costs average 12\1/
2\ cents per hundredweight, with a $9.00 minimum fee. In addition to 
paying the inspection fee, handlers may also experience delays in 
shipments while waiting for inspection to be completed. Handlers

[[Page 11157]]

indicated that such delays could be longer for smaller shippers that do 
not have inspectors regularly stationed at their warehouses. This 
proposal seeks to reduce these costs by allowing alternatives to 
mandatory inspection.
    Traditionally, the pear industry has used end-line inspection 
procedures. Under this scenario, samples of packed pears are examined 
at the end of the production process, and the results are certified by 
Federally licensed inspectors. The record shows that in recent years, 
the Federal-State Inspection Service has developed effective, less 
costly alternatives to the end-line inspection program. One alternative 
is the ``Partners in Quality'' program, a documented quality assurance 
system. Under this program, individual packing houses must demonstrate 
and document their ability to pack product that meets all relevant 
quality requirements. Effectiveness of the program is verified through 
periodic, unannounced audits of each packer's system by USDA-approved 
auditors.
    Another program recently developed is the Customer Assisted 
Inspection Program (CAIP). Under CAIP, USDA inspectors oversee the in-
line sampling and inspection process performed by trained company 
staff. USDA oversight ranges from periodic visits throughout the day to 
a continuous on-site presence. Witnesses at the hearing testified that 
the fresh pear industry should be able to utilize any method of 
inspection acceptable to the Federal-State Inspection Service. These 
alternative methods have been developed by USDA as a means of reducing 
costs to industry. If this amendment were implemented, individual pear 
handlers could choose the method of inspection best suited to their 
operations, thereby possibly reducing costs associated with inspection.
    Additionally, the authority to eliminate inspection requirements 
could have handler cost implications. However, any increase or decrease 
in costs could not be determined until specific alternative methods are 
developed to assure compliance with any quality and size standards in 
effect.
    The proposal to authorize container marking requirements is not 
expected to result in significant cost increases for fresh pear 
handlers. Testimony indicated that packing facilities are already 
configured for labeling and container marking. Witnesses noted that 
there would be little, if any, need for equipment changes or additions. 
Thus, the proposed change is not expected to have any adverse financial 
impact related to handling fresh pears. It should be noted that the 
proposed amendment would only grant the committees authority to 
recommend container markings; implementation of this authority could be 
done through informal rulemaking in the future. The amendment itself 
would therefore not impose any new regulatory requirements on Oregon or 
Washington fresh pear handlers.
    Witnesses explained that the winter, summer/fall, fresh and 
processed pear industries are closely inter-related. Growing, 
harvesting, packing, processing and marketing activities of these 
industries all impact each other. Thus, bringing all industry segments 
together under a single marketing program would be beneficial for the 
Oregon and Washington pear industry. Proponent witnesses stated that 
the combined amendments, if implemented, would help to improve the 
orderly marketing of product within the industry.
    Similarly, coordinated marketing and distribution efforts for fresh 
varieties that appear in the marketplace simultaneously would assist in 
maximizing grower returns from each variety. While the industries 
currently undertake coordinated marketing and promotional activities, 
witnesses stated that combining these industries would further 
synchronize activities and facilitate industry discussions and 
decision-making.
    The amendments would add authority to assess summer/fall pear 
handlers and undertake promotional activities on their behalf in a 
manner similar to that done currently for winter pears. When asked if 
assuming this authority would be acceptable to the summer/fall pear 
industry, witnesses supported promotional activities, including paid 
generic advertising, as a way to boost sales and maintain market share.
    Post-harvest research would also benefit the pear industries by 
focusing on a section of the pear crop-to-market flow that, until now, 
has not benefited from research activities. Improved storage techniques 
resulting from industry-funded post-harvest research could benefit the 
pear industry by decreasing the loss of product due to storage, or by 
increasing the storability of product to help prolong the marketing 
season.
    A significant market-facilitating function carried out by the 
current marketing order committees is the collection of statistical 
data. That function would continue under the amended marketing order 
and the authority to collect information would extend to additional 
varieties that are currently produced. Flexibility is provided for 
including other varieties in the future. Witnesses emphasized the 
importance and value of collecting and disseminating accurate 
statistical information to enable industry participants to make 
economic and marketing decisions.
    The proposal to establish two administrative committees also 
includes the addition of a public member to each of those committees. 
The benefit of adding a non-industry, consumer perspective to committee 
deliberations and decision-making could prove very beneficial. 
Witnesses stated that this additional perspective would improve the 
committees' understanding of the consumer in the marketplace and could 
enhance committee activities aimed at increasing consumer demand for 
Oregon and Washington pears.
    The addition of a public member to each committee is not expected 
to result in any substantial cost increases. While these members would 
be entitled to reimbursement for certain expenses allowed for under the 
order, this expense is neither different nor any more burdensome than 
the current reimbursement arrangement for committee members.
    Interested persons were invited to present evidence at the hearing 
on the probable regulatory and informational impact of the proposed 
amendments to the order on small entities. The record evidence is that 
most of the amendments are designed to reduce costs. While some of the 
proposals could impose some minimal costs, those costs would be 
outweighed by the benefits expected to accrue to the Oregon and 
Washington pear industry.
    As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are 
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and 
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
    The Department has not identified any relevant Federal rules that 
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this proposed rule. These 
amendments are designed to enhance the administration and functioning 
of the marketing order to the benefit of the industry.
    Committee meetings regarding these proposals as well as the hearing 
dates were widely publicized throughout the winter pear industry, and 
all interested persons were invited to attend the meetings and the 
hearing and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. All 
Committee meetings and the hearing were public forums and all entities, 
both large and small, were able to express views on these issues.

[[Page 11158]]

    Current information collection requirements for part 927 are 
approved by OMB under OMB number 0581-0089. Any changes in those 
requirements as a result of this proceeding would be submitted to OMB 
for approval. Witnesses stated that existing forms could be adequately 
modified to serve the needs of the proposed fresh and processed pear 
committees. While conforming changes to the forms would need to be made 
(such as changing the name of the committee), the functionality of the 
forms would remain the same. Therefore, there would be no modification 
to reporting and recordkeeping burdens generated from these proposed 
amendments.

Civil Justice Reform

    The amendments to Marketing Agreement and Order 927 proposed herein 
have been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. 
They are not intended to have retroactive effect. If adopted, the 
proposed amendments would not preempt any State or local laws, 
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable 
conflict with this proposal.
    The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition 
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation 
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and 
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A 
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. 
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides 
that the district court of the United States in any district in which 
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of 
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, 
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of 
the entry of the ruling.

Findings and Conclusions

    The material issues, findings and conclusions, rulings, and general 
findings and determinations included in the Recommended Decision set 
forth in the January 13, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 
2520) are hereby approved and adopted.

Marketing Agreement and Order

    Annexed hereto and made a part hereof is the document entitled 
``Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Winter Pears 
Grown in Oregon and Washington.'' This document has been decided upon 
as the detailed and appropriate means of effectuating the foregoing 
findings and conclusions.
    It is hereby ordered, That this entire decision be published in the 
Federal Register.

Referendum Order

    It is hereby directed that a referendum be conducted in accordance 
with the procedure for the conduct of referenda (7 CFR part 900.400 et 
seq.) to determine whether the annexed order amending the order 
regulating the handling of winter pears grown in Oregon and Washington 
is approved or favored by producers, as defined under the terms of the 
order, who during the representative period were engaged in the 
production of pears in the production area.
    The representative period for the conduct of such referendum is 
hereby determined to be July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004.
    The agent of the Secretary to conduct such referendum is hereby 
designated to be Susan Hiller and Gary Olson, Northwest Marketing Field 
Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable 
Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW. Third Avenue, room 385, Portland, Oregon 
97204; telephone (503) 326-2724.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 927

    Marketing agreements, Winter pears, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    Dated: February 28, 2005.
Barry L. Carpenter,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.

Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Winter Pears Grown 
in Oregon and Washington \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This order shall not become effective unless and until the 
requirements of Sec.  900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure 
governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and 
marketing orders have been met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Findings and Determinations

    The findings and determinations hereinafter set forth are 
supplementary to the findings and determinations which were previously 
made in connection with the issuance of the marketing agreement and 
order; and all said previous findings and determinations are hereby 
ratified and affirmed, except insofar as such findings and 
determinations may be in conflict with the findings and determinations 
set forth herein.
    (a) Findings and Determinations Upon the Basis of the Hearing 
Record.
    Pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement 
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable 
rules of practice and procedure effective thereunder (7 CFR part 900), 
a public hearing was held upon the proposed amendments to the Marketing 
Agreement and Order No. 927 (7 CFR part 927), regulating the handling 
of winter pears grown in Oregon and Washington. Upon the basis of the 
evidence introduced at such hearing and the record thereof, it is found 
that:
    (1) The marketing agreement and order, as amended, and as hereby 
proposed to be further amended, and all of the terms and conditions 
thereof, would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act;
    (2) The marketing agreement and order, as amended, and as hereby 
proposed to be further amended, regulate the handling of pears grown in 
the production area in the same manner as, and are applicable only to, 
persons in the respective classes of commercial and industrial activity 
specified in the marketing agreement and order upon which a hearing has 
been held;
    (3) The marketing agreement and order, as amended, and as hereby 
proposed to be further amended, are limited in their application to the 
smallest regional production area which is practicable, consistent with 
carrying out the declared policy of the Act, and the issuance of 
several orders applicable to subdivisions of the production area would 
not effectively carry out the declared policy of the Act;
    (4) The marketing agreement and order, as amended, and as hereby 
proposed to be further amended, prescribe, insofar as practicable, such 
different terms applicable to different parts of the production area as 
are necessary to give due recognition to the differences in the 
production and marketing of pears grown in the production area; and
    (5) All handling of pears grown in the production area as defined 
in the marketing agreement and order, is in the current of interstate 
or foreign commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such 
commerce.

Order Relative to Handling

    It is therefore ordered, That on and after the effective date 
hereof, all handling of pears grown in Oregon and Washington shall be 
in conformity to, and in compliance with, the terms and conditions of 
the said order as hereby proposed to be amended as follows:

[[Page 11159]]

    The provisions of the proposed marketing agreement and order 
contained in the Recommended Decision issued by the Administrator on 
January 5, 2005, and published in the Federal Register on January 13, 
2005, will be and are the terms and provisions of this order amending 
the order and are set forth in full herein.

PART 927--PEARS GROWN IN OREGON AND WASHINGTON

    1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 927 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.

    2. Revise the heading of part 927 to read as set forth above.
    3. Revise Sec.  927.1 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.1  Secretary.

    Secretary means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, 
or any officer or employee of the Department of Agriculture who has 
been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, the 
authority to act for the Secretary.
    4. Revise Sec.  927.3 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.3  Person.

    Person means an individual partnership, corporation, association, 
legal representative, or any other business unit.
    5. Revise Sec.  927.4 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.4  Pears.

    (a) Pears means and includes any and all varieties or subvarieties 
of pears with the genus Pyrus that are produced in the production area 
and are classified as:
    (1) Summer/fall pears including Bartlett and Starkrimson pears;
    (2) Winter pears including Beurre D'Anjou, Beurre Bosc, Doyenne du 
Comice, Concorde, Forelle, Winter Nelis, Packham, Seckel, and Taylor's 
Gold pears; and
    (3) Other pears including any or all other varieties or 
subvarieties of pears not classified as summer/fall or winter pears.
    (b) The Fresh Pear Committee and/or the Processed Pear Committee, 
with the approval of the Secretary, may recognize new or delete 
obsolete varieties or subvarieties for each category.
    6. Revise Sec.  927.5 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.5  Size.

    Size means the number of pears which can be packed in a 44-pound 
net weight standard box or container equivalent, or as ``size'' means 
the greatest transverse diameter of the pear taken at right angles to a 
line running from the stem to the blossom end, or such other 
specifications more specifically defined in a regulation issued under 
this part.
    7. Revise Sec.  927.6 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.6  Grower.

    Grower is synonymous with producer and means any person engaged in 
the production of pears, either as owner or as tenant.
    8. Revise Sec.  927.7 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.7  Handler.

    Handler is synonymous with shipper and means any person (except a 
common or contract carrier transporting pears owned by another person) 
who, as owner, agent, broker, or otherwise, ships or handles pears, or 
causes pears to be shipped or handled by rail, truck, boat, or any 
other means whatsoever.
    9. Revise Sec.  927.8 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.8  Ship or handle.

    Ship or handle means to sell, deliver, consign, transport or ship 
pears within the production area or between the production area and any 
point outside thereof, including receiving pears for processing: 
Provided, That the term ``'handle''' shall not include the 
transportation of pear shipments within the production area from the 
orchard where grown to a packing facility located within the production 
area for preparation for market or delivery for processing.
    10. Revise Sec.  927.9 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.9  Fiscal period.

    Fiscal period means the period beginning July 1 of any year and 
ending June 30 of the following year or such may be approved by the 
Secretary pursuant to a joint recommendation by the Fresh Pear 
Committee and the Processed Pear Committee.
    11. Revise Sec.  927.11 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.11  District.

    District means the applicable one of the following-described 
subdivisions of the production area covered by the provisions of this 
subpart:
    (a) For the purpose of committee representation, administration and 
application of provisions of this subpart as applicable to pears for 
the fresh market, districts shall be defined as follows:
    (1) Medford District shall include all the counties in the State of 
Oregon except for Hood River and Wasco counties.
    (2) Mid-Columbia District shall include Hood River and Wasco 
counties in the State of Oregon, and the counties of Skamania and 
Klickitat in the State of Washington.
    (3) Wenatchee District shall include the counties of King, Chelan, 
Okanogan, Douglas, Grant, Lincoln, and Spokane in the State of 
Washington, and all other counties in Washington lying north thereof.
    (4) Yakima District shall include all of the State of Washington, 
not included in the Wenatchee District or in the Mid-Columbia District.
    (b) For the purpose of committee representation, administration and 
application of provisions of this subpart as applicable to pears for 
processing, districts shall be defined as follows:
    (1) The State of Washington.
    (2) The State of Oregon.
    (c) The Secretary, upon recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee 
or the Processed Pear Committee, may reestablish districts within the 
production area.
    12. Revise Sec.  927.13 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.13  Subvariety.

    Subvariety means and includes any mutation, sport, or other 
derivation of any of the varieties covered in Sec.  927.4 which is 
recognized by the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee 
and approved by the Secretary. Recognition of a subvariety shall 
include classification within a varietal group for the purposes of 
votes conducted under Sec.  927.52.
    13. Add a new Sec.  927.14 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.14  Processor.

    Processor means any person who as owner, agent, broker, or 
otherwise, commercially processes pears in the production area.
    14. Add a new Sec.  927.15 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.15  Process.

    Process means to can, concentrate, freeze, dehydrate, press or 
puree pears, or in any other way convert pears commercially into a 
processed product.
    15. Revise the undesignated center heading preceding Sec.  927.20 
to read as follows:

Administrative Bodies

    16. Revise Sec.  927.20 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.20  Establishment and membership.

    There are hereby established two committees to administer the terms 
and provisions of this subpart as specifically provided in Sec. Sec.  
927.20 through 927.35:
    (a) A Fresh Pear Committee, consisting of 13 individual persons as 
its members is established to administer order provisions relating to 
the handling of pears for the fresh market. Six members of the Fresh 
Pear Committee shall be growers, six members shall be handlers, and one 
member shall represent the public. For each member

[[Page 11160]]

there shall be two alternates, designated as the ``first alternate'' 
and the ``second alternate,'' respectively. Each district shall be 
represented by one grower member and one handler member, except that 
the Mid-Columbia District and the Wenatchee District shall be 
represented by two grower members and two handler members.
    (b) A Processed Pear Committee consisting of 10 members is 
established to administer order provisions relating to the handling of 
pears for processing. Three members of the Processed Pear Committee 
shall be growers, three members shall be handlers, three members shall 
be processors, and one member shall represent the public. For each 
member there shall be two alternates, designated as the ``first 
alternate'' and the ``second alternate,'' respectively. District 1, the 
State of Washington, shall be represented by two grower members, two 
handler members and two processor members. District 2, the State of 
Oregon, shall be represented by one grower member, one handler member 
and one processor member.
    (c) The Secretary, upon recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee 
or the Processed Pear Committee may reapportion members among 
districts, may change the number of members and alternates, and may 
change the composition by changing the ratio of members, including 
their alternates. In recommending any such changes, the following shall 
be considered:
    (1) Shifts in pear acreage within districts and within the 
production area during recent years;
    (2) The importance of new pear production in its relation to 
existing districts;
    (3) The equitable relationship between membership and districts;
    (4) Economies to result for growers in promoting efficient 
administration due to redistricting or reapportionment of members 
within districts; and
    (5) Other relevant factors.
    17. Revise Sec.  927.21 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.21  Nomination and selection of members and their respective 
alternates.

    Grower members and their respective alternates for each district 
shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees elected by the growers 
in such district. Handler members and their respective alternates for 
each district shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees elected 
by the handlers in such district. Processor members and their 
respective alternates shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees 
elected by the processors. Public members for each committee shall be 
nominated by the Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee, 
each independently, and selected by the Secretary. The Fresh Pear 
Committee and the Processed Pear Committee may, each independently, 
prescribe such additional qualifications, administrative rules and 
procedures for selection for each candidate as it deems necessary and 
as the Secretary approves.
    18. Revise Sec.  927.22 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.22  Meetings for election of nominees.

    (a) Nominations for members of the Fresh Pear Committee and their 
alternates shall be made at meetings of growers and handlers held in 
each of the districts designated in Sec.  927.11 at such times and 
places designated by the Fresh Pear Committee.
    (b) Nominations for grower and handler members of the Processed 
Pear Committee and their alternates shall be made at meetings of 
growers and handlers held in each of the districts designated in Sec.  
927.11 at such times and places designated by the Processed Pear 
Committee. Nominations for processor members of the Processed Pear 
Committee and their alternates shall be made at a meeting of processors 
at such time and place designated by the Processed Pear Committee.
    19. Revise Sec.  927.23 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.23  Voting.

    Only growers in attendance at meetings for election of nominees 
shall participate in the nomination of grower members and their 
alternates, and only handlers in attendance at meetings for election of 
nominees shall participate in the nomination of handler members and 
their alternates, and only processors in attendance for election of 
nominees shall participate in the nomination of processor members and 
their alternates. A grower may participate only in the election held in 
the district in which he or she produces pears, and a handler may 
participate only in the election held in the district in which he or 
she handles pears. Each person may vote as a grower, handler or 
processor, but not a combination thereof. Each grower, handler and 
processor shall be entitled to cast one vote, on behalf of himself, his 
agents, partners, affiliates, subsidiaries, and representatives, for 
each nominee to be elected.
    20. Revise Sec.  927.24 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.24  Eligibility for membership.

    Each grower member and each of his or her alternates shall be a 
grower, or an officer or employee of a corporate or LLC grower, who 
grows pears in the district in which and for which he or she is 
nominated and selected. Each handler member and each of his or her 
alternates shall be a handler, or an officer or employee of a handler, 
handling pears in the district in and for which he or she is nominated 
and selected. Each processor member and each of their alternates shall 
be a processor, or an officer or employee of a processor, who processes 
pears in the production area.
    21. Revise Sec.  927.26 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.26  Qualifications.

    Any person prior to or within 15 days after selection as a member 
or as an alternate for a member of the Fresh Pear Committee or the 
Processed Pear Committee shall qualify by filing with the Secretary a 
written acceptance of the person's willingness to serve.
    22. Revise Sec.  927.27 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.27  Term of office.

    The term of office of each member and alternate member of the Fresh 
Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee shall be for two years 
beginning July 1 and ending June 30: Provided, That the terms of office 
of one-half the initial members and alternates shall end June 30, 2006; 
and that beginning with the 2005-2006 fiscal period, no member shall 
serve more than three consecutive two-year terms unless specifically 
exempted by the Secretary. Members and alternate members shall serve in 
such capacities for the portion of the term of office for which they 
are selected and have qualified and until their respective successors 
are selected and have qualified. The terms of office of successor 
members and alternates shall be so determined that one-half of the 
total committee membership ends each June 30.
    23. Revise Sec.  927.28 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.28  Alternates for members.

    The first alternate for a member shall act in the place and stead 
of the member for whom he or she is an alternate during such member's 
absence. In the event of the death, removal, resignation, or 
disqualification of a member, his or her first alternate shall act as a 
member until a successor for the member is selected and has qualified. 
The second alternate for a member shall serve in the place and stead of 
the member for whom he or she is an alternate whenever both the member 
and his or her first alternate are unable to serve. In the event that a 
member of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee and 
both that member's alternates are unable to attend a meeting, the 
member may designate any other alternate member from the same

[[Page 11161]]

group (handler, processor, or grower) to serve in that member's place 
and stead.
    24. Revise Sec.  927.29 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.29  Vacancies.

    To fill any vacancy occasioned by the failure of any person 
selected as a member or as an alternate for a member of the Fresh Pear 
Committee or the Processed Pear Committee to qualify, or in the event 
of death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of any qualified 
member or qualified alternate for a member, a successor for his or her 
unexpired term shall be nominated and selected in the manner set forth 
in Sec. Sec.  927.20 to 927.35. If nominations to fill any such vacancy 
are not made within 20 days after such vacancy occurs, the Secretary 
may fill such vacancy without regard to nominations.
    25. Revise Sec.  927.30 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.30  Compensation and expenses.

    The members and alternates for members shall serve without 
compensation, but may be reimbursed for expenses necessarily incurred 
by them in the performance of their respective duties.
    26. Revise Sec.  927.31 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.31  Powers.

    The Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee shall 
have the following powers to exercise each independently:
    (a) To administer, as specifically provided in Sec. Sec.  927.20 to 
927.35, the terms and provisions of this subpart:
    (b) To make administrative rules and regulations in accordance 
with, and to effectuate, the terms and provisions of this subpart; and
    (c) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints 
of violations of the provisions of this subpart.
    27. Revise Sec.  927.32 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.32  Duties.

    The duties of the Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear 
Committee, each independently, shall be as follows:
    (a) To act as intermediary between the Secretary and any grower, 
handler or processor;
    (b) To keep minutes, books, and records which will reflect clearly 
all of the acts and transactions. The minutes, books, and records shall 
be subject at any time to examination by the Secretary or by such 
person as may be designated by the Secretary;
    (c) To investigate, from time to time, and to assemble data on the 
growing, harvesting, shipping, and marketing conditions relative to 
pears, and to furnish to the Secretary such available information as 
may be requested;
    (d) To perform such duties as may be assigned to it from time to 
time by the Secretary in connection with the administration of section 
32 of the Act to amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act, and for other 
purposes, Public Act No. 320, 74th Congress, approved August 24, 1935 
(49 Stat. 774), as amended;
    (e) To cause the books to be audited by one or more competent 
accountants at the end of each fiscal year and at such other times as 
the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may deem 
necessary or as the Secretary may request, and to file with the 
Secretary copies of any and all audit reports made;
    (f) To appoint such employees agents, and representatives as it may 
deem necessary, and to determine the compensation and define the duties 
of each;
    (g) To give the Secretary, or the designated agent of the 
Secretary, the same notice of meetings as is given to the members of 
the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee;
    (h) To select a chairman of the Fresh Pear Committee or the 
Processed Pear Committee and, from time to time, such other officers as 
it may deem advisable and to define the duties of each; and
    (i) To submit to the Secretary as soon as practicable after the 
beginning of each fiscal period, a budget for such fiscal year, 
including a report in explanation of the items appearing therein and a 
recommendation as to the rate of assessment for such period.
    28. Revise Sec.  927.33 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.33  Procedure.

    (a) Quorum and voting. A quorum at a meeting of the Fresh Pear 
Committee or the Processed Pear Committee shall consist of 75 percent 
of the number of committee members, or alternates then serving in the 
place of any members, respectively. Except as otherwise provided in 
Sec.  927.52, all decisions of the Fresh Pear Committee or the 
Processed Pear Committee at any meeting shall require the concurring 
vote of at least 75 percent of those members present, including 
alternates then serving in the place of any members.
    (b) Mail voting. The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear 
Committee may provide for members voting by mail, telecopier or other 
electronic means, telephone, or telegraph, upon due notice to all 
members. Promptly after voting by telephone or telegraph, each member 
thus voting shall confirm in writing, the vote so cast.
    29. Revise Sec.  927.34 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.34  Right of the Secretary.

    The members and alternates for members and any agent or employee 
appointed or employed by the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear 
Committee shall be subject to removal or suspension by the Secretary at 
any time. Each and every regulation, decision, determination, or other 
act shall be subject to the continuing right of the Secretary to 
disapprove of the same at any time, and, upon such disapproval, shall 
be deemed null and void, except as to acts done in reliance thereon or 
in compliance therewith prior to such disapproval by the Secretary.
    30. Revise Sec.  927.35 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.35  Funds and other property.

    (a) All funds received pursuant to any of the provisions of this 
subpart shall be used solely for the purposes specified in this 
subpart, and the Secretary may require the Fresh Pear Committee or the 
Processed Pear Committee and its members to account for all receipts 
and disbursements.
    (b) Upon the death, resignation, removal, disqualification, or 
expiration of the term of office of any member or employee, all books, 
records, funds, and other property in his or her possession belonging 
to the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee shall be 
delivered to his or her successor in office or to the Fresh Pear 
Committee or Processed Pear Committee, and such assignments and other 
instruments shall be executed as may be necessary to vest in such 
successor or in the Fresh Pear Committee or Processed Pear Committee 
full title to all the books, records, funds, and other property in the 
possession or under the control of such member or employee pursuant to 
this subpart.
    31. Remove Sec.  927.36, Public advisors.
    32. Revise Sec.  927.40 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.40  Expenses.

    The Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee are 
authorized, each independently, to incur such expenses as the Secretary 
finds may be necessary to carry out their functions under this subpart. 
The funds to cover such expenses shall be acquired by the levying of 
assessments as provided in Sec.  927.41.
    33. Revise Sec.  927.41 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.41  Assessments.

    (a) Assessments will be levied only upon handlers who first handle 
pears. Each handler shall pay assessments on all pears handled by such 
handler as the pro rata share of the expenses which the Secretary finds 
are reasonable and likely to be incurred by the Fresh Pear

[[Page 11162]]

Committee or the Processed Pear Committee during a fiscal period. The 
payment of assessments for the maintenance and functioning of the Fresh 
Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may be required under 
this part throughout the period such assessments are payable 
irrespective of whether particular provisions thereof are suspended or 
become inoperative.
    (b)(1) Based upon a recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee or 
other available data, the Secretary shall fix three base rates of 
assessment for pears that handlers shall pay on pears handled for the 
fresh market during each fiscal period. Such base rates shall include 
one rate of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of 
pears classified as summer/fall; one rate of assessment for any or all 
varieties or subvarieties of pears, classified as winter; and one rate 
of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears 
classified as other. Upon recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee or 
other available data, the Secretary may also fix supplemental rates of 
assessment on individual varieties or subvarieties categorized within 
the above-defined assessment classifications to secure sufficient funds 
to provide for projects authorized under Sec.  927.47. At any time 
during the fiscal period when it is determined on the basis of a Fresh 
Pear Committee recommendation or other information that different rates 
are necessary for fresh pears or for any varieties or subvarieties, the 
Secretary may modify those rates of assessment and such new rate shall 
apply to any or all varieties or subvarieties that are shipped during 
the fiscal period for fresh market.
    (2) Based upon a recommendation of the Processed Pear Committee or 
other available data, the Secretary shall fix three base rates of 
assessment for pears that handlers shall pay on pears handled for 
processing during each fiscal period. Such base rates shall include one 
rate of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears 
classified as summer/fall; one rate of assessment for any or all 
varieties or subvarieties of pears, classified as winter; and one rate 
of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears 
classified as other. Upon recommendation of the Processed Pear 
Committee or other available data, the Secretary may also fix 
supplemental rates of assessment on individual varieties or 
subvarieties categorized within the above-defined assessment 
classifications to secure sufficient funds to provide for projects 
authorized under Sec.  927.47. At any time during the fiscal period 
when it is determined on the basis of a Processed Pear Committee 
recommendation or other information that different rates are necessary 
for pears for processing or for any varieties or subvarieties, the 
Secretary may modify those rates of assessment and such new rate shall 
apply to any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears that are shipped 
during the fiscal period for processing.
    (c) Based on the recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee, the 
Processed Pear Committee or other available data, the Secretary may 
establish additional base rates of assessments, or change or modify the 
base rate classifications defined in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this 
section.
    (d) The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may 
impose a late payment charge on any handler who fails to pay any 
assessment within the time prescribed. In the event the handler 
thereafter fails to pay the amount outstanding, including the late 
payment charge, within the prescribed time, the Fresh Pear Committee or 
the Processed Pear Committee may impose an additional charge in the 
form of interest on such outstanding amount. The Fresh Pear Committee 
or the Processed Pear Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, 
shall prescribe the amount of such late payment charge and rate of 
interest.
    (e) In order to provide funds to carry out the functions of the 
Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee prior to 
commencement of shipments in any season, handlers may make advance 
payments of assessments, which advance payments shall be credited to 
such handlers and the assessments of such handlers shall be adjusted so 
that such assessments are based upon the quantity of each variety or 
subvariety of pears handled by such handlers during such season. 
Further, payment discounts may be authorized by the Fresh Pear 
Committee or the Processed Pear Committee upon the approval of the 
Secretary to handlers making such advance assessment payments.
    34. Revise Sec.  927.42 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.42  Accounting.

    (a) If, at the end of a fiscal period, the assessments collected 
are in excess of expenses incurred, the Fresh Pear Committee or the 
Processed Pear Committee may carryover such excess into subsequent 
fiscal periods as a reserve: Provided, That funds already in the 
reserve do not exceed approximately one fiscal period's expenses. Such 
reserve may be used to cover any expense authorized under this part and 
to cover necessary expenses of liquidation in the event of termination 
of this part. Any such excess not retained in a reserve or applied to 
any outstanding obligation of the person from whom it was collected 
shall be refunded proportionately to the persons from whom it was 
collected. Upon termination of this part, any funds not required to 
defray the necessary expenses of liquidation shall be disposed of in 
such manner as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate: Provided, 
That to the extent practical, such funds shall be returned pro rata to 
the persons from whom such funds were collected.
    (b) All funds received pursuant to the provisions of this part 
shall be used solely for the purpose specified in this part and shall 
be accounted for in the manner provided in this part. The Secretary may 
at any time require the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear 
Committee and its members to account for all receipts and 
disbursements.
    35. Revise Sec.  927.43 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.43  Use of funds.

    From the funds acquired pursuant to Sec.  927.41 the Fresh Pear 
Committee and the Processed Pear Committee, each independently, shall 
pay the salaries of its employees, if any, and pay the expenses 
necessarily incurred in the performance of the duties of the Fresh Pear 
Committee or the Processed Pear Committee.
    36. Remove Sec.  927.44, Collection of unpaid assessments.
    37. Revise Sec.  927.45 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.45  Contributions.

    The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may accept 
voluntary contributions but these shall only be used to pay expenses 
incurred pursuant to Sec.  927.47. Furthermore, such contributions 
shall be free from any encumbrances by the donor and the Fresh Pear 
Committee or the Processed Pear Committee shall retain complete control 
of their use.
    38. Revise Sec.  927.47 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.47  Research and development.

    The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee, with the 
approval of the Secretary, may establish or provide for the 
establishment of production and post-harvest research, or marketing 
research and development projects designed to assist, improve, or 
promote the marketing, distribution, and consumption of pears. Such 
projects may provide for any form of marketing promotion, including 
paid advertising. The expense of such projects shall be paid from funds

[[Page 11163]]

collected pursuant to Sec. Sec.  927.41 and 927.45. Expenditures for a 
particular variety or subvariety of pears shall approximate the amount 
of assessments and voluntary contributions collected for that variety 
or subvariety of pears.
    39. Revise Sec.  927.50 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.50  Marketing policy.

    (a) It shall be the duty of the Fresh Pear Committee to 
investigate, from time to time, supply and demand conditions relative 
to pears and each grade, size, and quality of each variety or 
subvariety thereof. Such investigations shall be with respect to the 
following:
    (1) Estimated production of each variety or subvariety of pears and 
of each grade, size, and quality thereof;
    (2) Prospective supplies and prices of pears and other fruits, both 
in fresh and processed form, which are competitive to the marketing of 
pears;
    (3) Prospective exports of pears and imports of pears from other 
producing areas;
    (4) Probable harvesting period for each variety or subvariety of 
pears;
    (5) The trend and level of consumer income;
    (6) General economic conditions; and
    (7) Other relevant factors.
    (b) On or before August 1 of each year, the Fresh Pear Committee 
shall recommend regulations to the Secretary if it finds, on the basis 
of the foregoing investigations, that such regulation as is provided in 
Sec.  927.51 will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act.
    (c) In the event the Fresh Pear Committee at any time finds that by 
reason of changed conditions any regulation issued pursuant to Sec.  
927.51 should be modified, suspended, or terminated, it shall so 
recommend to the Secretary.
    40. Revise Sec.  927.51 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.51  Issuance of regulations; and modification, suspension, or 
termination thereof.

    (a) Whenever the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and 
information submitted by the Fresh Pear Committee, or from other 
available information, that regulation, in the manner specified in this 
section, of the shipment of fresh pears would tend to effectuate the 
declared policy of the act, he or she shall so limit the shipment of 
such pears during a specified period or periods. Such regulation may:
    (1) Limit the total quantity of any grade, size, quality, or 
combinations thereof, of any variety or subvariety of pears grown in 
any district and may prescribe different requirements applicable to 
shipments to different export markets;
    (2) Limit, during any period or periods, the shipment of any 
particular grade, size, quality, or any combination thereof, of any 
variety or subvariety, of pears grown in any district or districts of 
the production area; and
    (3) Provide a method, through rules and regulation issued pursuant 
to this part, for fixing markings on the container or containers, which 
may be used in the packaging or handling of pears, including 
appropriate logo or other container markings to identify the contents 
thereof.
    (b) Whenever the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and 
information submitted by the Fresh Pear Committee, or from other 
available information, that a regulation should be modified, suspended, 
or terminated with respect to any or all shipments of fresh pears grown 
in any district in order to effectuate the declared policy of the act, 
he or she shall so modify, suspend, or terminate such regulation. If 
the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and information submitted 
by the Fresh Pear Committee, or from other available information, that 
a regulation obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared 
policy of the act, he or she shall suspend or terminate such 
regulation. On the same basis and in like manner, the Secretary may 
terminate any such modification or suspension.
    41. Revise Sec.  927.52 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.52  Prerequisites to recommendations.

    (a) Decisions of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear 
Committee with respect to any recommendations to the Secretary pursuant 
to the establishment or modification of a supplemental rate of 
assessment for an individual variety or subvariety of pears shall be 
made by affirmative vote of not less than 75 percent of the applicable 
total number of votes, computed in the manner hereinafter described in 
this section, of all members. Decisions of the Fresh Pear Committee 
pursuant to the provisions of Sec.  927.50 shall be made by an 
affirmative vote of not less than 80 percent of the applicable total 
number of votes, computed in the manner hereinafter prescribed in this 
section, of all members.
    (b) With respect to a particular variety or subvariety of pears, 
the applicable total number of votes shall be the aggregate of the 
votes allotted to the members in accordance with the following: Each 
member shall have one vote as an individual and, in addition, shall 
have a vote equal to the percentage of the vote of the district 
represented by such member; and such district vote shall be computed as 
soon as practical after the beginning of each fiscal period on either:
    (1) The basis of one vote for each 25,000 boxes (except 2,500 boxes 
for varieties or subvarieties with less than 200,000 standard boxes or 
container equivalents) of the average quantity of such variety or 
subvariety produced in the particular district and shipped therefrom 
during the immediately preceding three fiscal periods; or
    (2) Such other basis as the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed 
Pear Committee may recommend and the Secretary may approve. The votes 
so allotted to a member may be cast by such member on each 
recommendation relative to the variety or subvariety of pears on which 
such votes were computed.
    42. Revise Sec.  927.53 to read as follows:


Sec.  927.53  Notification.

    (a) The Fresh Pear Committee shall give prompt notice to growers 
and handlers of each recommendation to the Secretary pursuant to the 
provisions of Sec.  927.50.
    (b) The Secretary shall immediately notify the Fresh Pear Committee 
of the issuance of each regulation and of each modification, 
suspension, or termination of a regulation and the Fresh Pear Committee 
shall give prompt notice thereof to growers and handlers.
    42a. Remove Sec.  927.54, Exemption certificates.
    43. Amend Sec.  927.60 by revising paragraph (a) and adding a new 
paragraph (c) to read as follows:


Sec.  927.60  Inspection and certification.

    (a) Handlers shall ship only fresh pears inspected by the Federal-
State Inspection Service or under a program developed by the Federal-
State Inspection Service: except, that such inspection and 
certification of shipments of pears may be performed by such other 
inspection service as the Fresh Pear Committee, with the approval of 
the Secretary, may designate. Promptly after shipment of any pears, the 
handler shall submit, or cause to be submitted, to the Fresh Pear 
Committee a copy of the inspection certificate issued on such shipment.
* * *
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.