Winter Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Secretary's Decision and Referendum Order on Proposed Amendments to Marketing Agreement and Order No. 927, 11155-11165 [05-4306]
Download as PDF
11155
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 44
Tuesday, March 8, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 927
[Docket No. AO–F&V–927–A1; FV04–927–1
PR]
Winter Pears Grown in Oregon and
Washington; Secretary’s Decision and
Referendum Order on Proposed
Amendments to Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 927
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum
order.
AGENCY:
This decision proposes
amending the marketing agreement and
order (order) for winter pears grown in
Oregon and Washington, and provides
producers with the opportunity to vote
in a referendum to determine if they
favor the changes. The amendments are
based on recommendations jointly
proposed by the Winter Pear Control
Committee and the Northwest Fresh
Bartlett Marketing Committee, which
are responsible for local administration
of orders 927 and 931, respectively.
Marketing Agreement and Order No.
931 regulates the handling of fresh
Bartlett pears grown in Oregon and
Washington. The amendments would
combine the winter pear and fresh
Bartlett orders into a single program
under marketing order 927, and would
add authority to assess pears for
processing. All of the proposals are
intended to streamline industry
organization and improve the
administration, operation, and
functioning of the program.
DATES: The referendum will be
conducted from March 22 through April
8, 2005. The representative period for
the purpose of the referendum is July 1,
2003, through June 30, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Schmaedick, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, Agricultural
SUMMARY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:41 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
Marketing Service, USDA, Post Office
Box 1035, Moab, UT 84532, telephone:
(435) 259–7988, fax: (435) 259–4945.
Small businesses may request
information on this proceeding by
contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237; telephone:
(202) 720–2491, fax: (202) 720–8938.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior
documents in this proceeding: Notice of
Hearing issued on March 24, 2004, and
published in the March 30, 2004, issue
of the Federal Register (69 FR 16501),
and a Recommended Decision issued on
January 5, 2005, and published in the
January 13, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 2520).
This action is governed by the
provisions of sections 556 and 557 of
title 5 of the United States Code and is
therefore excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
Preliminary Statement
The amendments are based on the
record of a public hearing held on April
13 and 14, 2004, in Yakima, Washington
and on April 16, 2004, in Portland,
Oregon. The hearing was held to
consider the proposed amendment of
Marketing Agreement and Order No.
927, regulating the handling of winter
pears grown in the States of Oregon and
Washington, hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘order.’’
The hearing was held pursuant to the
provisions of the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘Act,’’ and the applicable rules
of practice and procedure governing the
formulation of marketing agreements
and marketing orders (7 CFR part 900).
Notice of this hearing was published
in the Federal Register on March 30,
2004 (69 FR 16501). The notice of
hearing contained order changes
proposed by both the Winter Pear
Control Committee and the Northwest
Fresh Bartlett Marketing Committee,
which are responsible for local
administration of orders 927 and 931,
respectively. Marketing order 927
regulates the handling of winter pears
grown in Oregon and Washington.
Marketing order 931 regulates the
handling of Bartlett pears in the same
production area.
The amendments included in this
decision would:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1. Expand the definition of ‘‘pears’’ to
include all varieties of pears classified
as summer/fall pears in addition to
winter pears; add Concorde, Packham,
and Taylor’s Gold pears to the current
list of winter pear varieties; and add a
third category of pears which would
include varieties not classified as
summer/fall or winter pears. This
amendment would extend program
coverage to all pears grown in Oregon
and Washington.
2. Revise the definition of ‘‘size’’ to
include language currently used within
the industry.
3. Extend the order’s coverage to pears
for processing by revising the definition
of ‘‘handle,’’ and adding definitions of
‘‘processor’’ and ‘‘process.’’
4. Establish districts for pears for
processing. This amendment would
divide the order’s production area into
two districts for pears for processing:
one being the State of Oregon and the
other being the State of Washington.
5. Dissolve the current Winter Pear
Control Committee and establish two
new administrative committees: The
Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed
Pear Committee (Committees). This
proposal would add a public member
and public alternate member seat to
both of the newly established
Committees and would remove Section
927.36, Public advisors. The
Committees would coordinate
administration of Marketing Order 927,
with each Committee recommending
assessments and administering program
functions specific to their commodity.
Coordinated administration would
allow each Committee to make
decisions on behalf of the commodity
they represent, yet combine
administrative functions, when
applicable, to maximize efficiencies and
minimize program costs.
Additionally, related changes would
be made to order provisions governing
nomination and selection of members
and their alternates, terms of office,
eligibility for membership, and quorum
and voting requirements, to reflect the
proposed dual committee structure.
6. Authorize changes in the number of
Committee members and alternates, and
allowing reapportionment of committee
membership among districts and groups
(i.e., growers, handlers, and processors).
Such changes would require a
Committee recommendation and
approval by the Department.
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
11156
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
7. Add authority to establish
assessment rates for each category of
pears, including: summer/fall pears,
winter pears, and all other pears. In
addition, rates of assessment could be
different for fresh pears and pears for
processing in each category, and could
include supplemental rates on
individual varieties.
8. Add authority for container
marking requirements for fresh pears.
9. Remove the order provision
allowing grower exemptions from
regulation. This is a tool no longer used
by the industry and, thus, is considered
obsolete.
10. Amend § 927.70, Reports, to
update order language regarding
confidentiality requirements to conform
to language under the Act.
11. Clarify inspection requirements
and adding authority to eliminate those
requirements if an alternative, adequate
method of ensuring compliance with
quality and size standards in effect
under the order can be developed.
12. Eliminate the current exemptions
for pears for processing and for pears
shipped to storage warehouses.
13. Provide that separate continuance
referenda be held every 6 years for fresh
pears and processing pears.
14. Add the authority for the
Committees to conduct post-harvest
research, in addition to production
research and promotion (including paid
advertising).
15. Update several order provisions to
make them more current.
16. Revise order provisions to reflect
the two-committee structure being
recommended for administration of the
program.
AMS also proposed to allow such
changes as may be necessary to the
order, if any of the proposed changes are
adopted, so that all of the order’s
provisions conform to the effectuated
amendments.
Upon the basis of evidence
introduced at the hearing and the record
thereof, the Administrator of AMS on
January 5, 2005, filed with the Hearing
Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, a
Recommended Decision and
Opportunity to File Written Exceptions
thereto by February 14, 2005. No
comments were filed.
Small Business Consideration
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
AMS has considered the economic
impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions so that
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
small businesses will not be unduly or
disproportionately burdened. Marketing
orders and amendments thereto are
unique in that they are normally
brought about through group action of
essentially small entities for their own
benefit. Thus, both the RFA and the Act
are compatible with respect to small
entities.
Small agricultural producers have
been defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA)(13 CFR 121.201)
as those having annual receipts of less
than $750,000. Small agricultural
service firms, which include handlers
regulated under the order, are defined as
those with annual receipts of less than
$5,000,000.
Interested persons were invited to
present evidence at the hearing on the
probable regulatory and informational
impact of the proposed amendments to
the order on small businesses. The
record evidence is that most of the
proposed amendments are designed to
enhance industry efficiencies and
reduce costs, thereby improving grower
returns.
The record indicates that there are
approximately 1,850 pear growers in
Oregon and Washington. Of that total,
1,345 growers report Bartlett or other
summer/fall pear production, and 1,753
growers report winter pear production.
Two-year average NASS figures (the
2002 crop year and preliminary figures
for 2003) provides the following
production profile for Washington and
Oregon, respectively: bearing acres,
24,800 and 17,600; yield per acre, 16.8
tons and 11.8 tons; annual production,
417,500 tons and 207,500 tons. Total
acres planted in pears for Washington
and Oregon (including non-bearing
acres) in 2002 were 26,586 and 22,822,
respectively.
Summing average Washington and
Oregon pear acreage for 2002 and 2003,
and dividing by the number of growers
(1,850), the estimated average acreage
per grower in the two-state area is 26.7
total acres and 22.9 bearing acres.
According to the 1997 Agricultural
Census, the average Oregon and
Washington pear grower had
approximately 23 and 15 total acres,
respectively. The sum of average
Washington and Oregon pear
production for 2002 and 2003, divided
by the number of growers, yields an
estimated average production per
grower in the two-state area of 338 tons
(676,000 pounds).
The average fresh market grower
return for the two States has been
between 20 and 22 cents per pound in
recent years, and between 10 and 12
cents per pound for processing.
Estimated 2-year average pear sales
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
revenue per grower in the production
area is approximately $101,000, which
is between 1⁄7 and 1⁄8 of the revenue that
would qualify a grower to be a large
grower according to the SBA definition
(if based on pear sales alone). According
to the hearing record, roughly 75
percent of the fresh pear producers in
the States of Oregon and Washington
qualify as small producers. One witness
stated that a 1,000-acre farm represents
the threshold between a small and a
large producer (a substantially different
definition from what the SBA uses).
There are 55 handlers that handle
fresh pears produced in Oregon and
Washington; 73 percent of these fall into
the SBA definition of ‘‘small business.’’
There are five processing plants in the
production area, with one in Oregon
and four in Washington. All five
processors are larger than the SBA’s
definition of small business. According
to information presented by processors
testifying at the hearing, roughly 90
percent of pears received for processing
come from small grower entities.
The proposals put forth at the hearing
would streamline industry organization,
but would not result in a significant
change in industry production, harvest
or distribution activities. In discussing
the impacts of the proposed
amendments on small growers and
handlers, witnesses indicated that the
changes are expected to result in lower
costs.
If implemented, the amendments
would result in the consolidation of
marketing orders 927 and 931,
regulating fresh winter pears and
summer/fall pears, respectively.
Program coverage would also be
extended to pears for processing. The
combined programs would be
administered by two new administrative
committees, one for fresh pears and one
for pears for processing. Cost savings
could occur as a result of more efficient
coordination of administrative activities
between the two proposed committees.
Record evidence indicates the
proposal to revise the order’s inspection
provisions may result in cost savings for
handlers. Handlers within the
production area typically have about 75
percent of their product inspected on a
voluntary basis. The remaining 25
percent represents the amount of
additional product that would be
required to be inspected if regulations
were in effect.
Handler witnesses also reported that
inspection costs average 121⁄2 cents per
hundredweight, with a $9.00 minimum
fee. In addition to paying the inspection
fee, handlers may also experience
delays in shipments while waiting for
inspection to be completed. Handlers
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
indicated that such delays could be
longer for smaller shippers that do not
have inspectors regularly stationed at
their warehouses. This proposal seeks to
reduce these costs by allowing
alternatives to mandatory inspection.
Traditionally, the pear industry has
used end-line inspection procedures.
Under this scenario, samples of packed
pears are examined at the end of the
production process, and the results are
certified by Federally licensed
inspectors. The record shows that in
recent years, the Federal-State
Inspection Service has developed
effective, less costly alternatives to the
end-line inspection program. One
alternative is the ‘‘Partners in Quality’’
program, a documented quality
assurance system. Under this program,
individual packing houses must
demonstrate and document their ability
to pack product that meets all relevant
quality requirements. Effectiveness of
the program is verified through
periodic, unannounced audits of each
packer’s system by USDA-approved
auditors.
Another program recently developed
is the Customer Assisted Inspection
Program (CAIP). Under CAIP, USDA
inspectors oversee the in-line sampling
and inspection process performed by
trained company staff. USDA oversight
ranges from periodic visits throughout
the day to a continuous on-site
presence. Witnesses at the hearing
testified that the fresh pear industry
should be able to utilize any method of
inspection acceptable to the FederalState Inspection Service. These
alternative methods have been
developed by USDA as a means of
reducing costs to industry. If this
amendment were implemented,
individual pear handlers could choose
the method of inspection best suited to
their operations, thereby possibly
reducing costs associated with
inspection.
Additionally, the authority to
eliminate inspection requirements could
have handler cost implications.
However, any increase or decrease in
costs could not be determined until
specific alternative methods are
developed to assure compliance with
any quality and size standards in effect.
The proposal to authorize container
marking requirements is not expected to
result in significant cost increases for
fresh pear handlers. Testimony
indicated that packing facilities are
already configured for labeling and
container marking. Witnesses noted that
there would be little, if any, need for
equipment changes or additions. Thus,
the proposed change is not expected to
have any adverse financial impact
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
related to handling fresh pears. It should
be noted that the proposed amendment
would only grant the committees
authority to recommend container
markings; implementation of this
authority could be done through
informal rulemaking in the future. The
amendment itself would therefore not
impose any new regulatory
requirements on Oregon or Washington
fresh pear handlers.
Witnesses explained that the winter,
summer/fall, fresh and processed pear
industries are closely inter-related.
Growing, harvesting, packing,
processing and marketing activities of
these industries all impact each other.
Thus, bringing all industry segments
together under a single marketing
program would be beneficial for the
Oregon and Washington pear industry.
Proponent witnesses stated that the
combined amendments, if implemented,
would help to improve the orderly
marketing of product within the
industry.
Similarly, coordinated marketing and
distribution efforts for fresh varieties
that appear in the marketplace
simultaneously would assist in
maximizing grower returns from each
variety. While the industries currently
undertake coordinated marketing and
promotional activities, witnesses stated
that combining these industries would
further synchronize activities and
facilitate industry discussions and
decision-making.
The amendments would add authority
to assess summer/fall pear handlers and
undertake promotional activities on
their behalf in a manner similar to that
done currently for winter pears. When
asked if assuming this authority would
be acceptable to the summer/fall pear
industry, witnesses supported
promotional activities, including paid
generic advertising, as a way to boost
sales and maintain market share.
Post-harvest research would also
benefit the pear industries by focusing
on a section of the pear crop-to-market
flow that, until now, has not benefited
from research activities. Improved
storage techniques resulting from
industry-funded post-harvest research
could benefit the pear industry by
decreasing the loss of product due to
storage, or by increasing the storability
of product to help prolong the
marketing season.
A significant market-facilitating
function carried out by the current
marketing order committees is the
collection of statistical data. That
function would continue under the
amended marketing order and the
authority to collect information would
extend to additional varieties that are
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11157
currently produced. Flexibility is
provided for including other varieties in
the future. Witnesses emphasized the
importance and value of collecting and
disseminating accurate statistical
information to enable industry
participants to make economic and
marketing decisions.
The proposal to establish two
administrative committees also includes
the addition of a public member to each
of those committees. The benefit of
adding a non-industry, consumer
perspective to committee deliberations
and decision-making could prove very
beneficial. Witnesses stated that this
additional perspective would improve
the committees’ understanding of the
consumer in the marketplace and could
enhance committee activities aimed at
increasing consumer demand for Oregon
and Washington pears.
The addition of a public member to
each committee is not expected to result
in any substantial cost increases. While
these members would be entitled to
reimbursement for certain expenses
allowed for under the order, this
expense is neither different nor any
more burdensome than the current
reimbursement arrangement for
committee members.
Interested persons were invited to
present evidence at the hearing on the
probable regulatory and informational
impact of the proposed amendments to
the order on small entities. The record
evidence is that most of the
amendments are designed to reduce
costs. While some of the proposals
could impose some minimal costs, those
costs would be outweighed by the
benefits expected to accrue to the
Oregon and Washington pear industry.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
The Department has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
proposed rule. These amendments are
designed to enhance the administration
and functioning of the marketing order
to the benefit of the industry.
Committee meetings regarding these
proposals as well as the hearing dates
were widely publicized throughout the
winter pear industry, and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meetings and the hearing and
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. All Committee meetings
and the hearing were public forums and
all entities, both large and small, were
able to express views on these issues.
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
11158
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Current information collection
requirements for part 927 are approved
by OMB under OMB number 0581–
0089. Any changes in those
requirements as a result of this
proceeding would be submitted to OMB
for approval. Witnesses stated that
existing forms could be adequately
modified to serve the needs of the
proposed fresh and processed pear
committees. While conforming changes
to the forms would need to be made
(such as changing the name of the
committee), the functionality of the
forms would remain the same.
Therefore, there would be no
modification to reporting and
recordkeeping burdens generated from
these proposed amendments.
Civil Justice Reform
The amendments to Marketing
Agreement and Order 927 proposed
herein have been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. They are not intended to have
retroactive effect. If adopted, the
proposed amendments would not
preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this proposal.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
Findings and Conclusions
The material issues, findings and
conclusions, rulings, and general
findings and determinations included in
the Recommended Decision set forth in
the January 13, 2005, issue of the
Federal Register (70 FR 2520) are
hereby approved and adopted.
Marketing Agreement and Order
Annexed hereto and made a part
hereof is the document entitled ‘‘Order
Amending the Order Regulating the
Handling of Winter Pears Grown in
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
Oregon and Washington.’’ This
document has been decided upon as the
detailed and appropriate means of
effectuating the foregoing findings and
conclusions.
It is hereby ordered, That this entire
decision be published in the Federal
Register.
Referendum Order
It is hereby directed that a referendum
be conducted in accordance with the
procedure for the conduct of referenda
(7 CFR part 900.400 et seq.) to
determine whether the annexed order
amending the order regulating the
handling of winter pears grown in
Oregon and Washington is approved or
favored by producers, as defined under
the terms of the order, who during the
representative period were engaged in
the production of pears in the
production area.
The representative period for the
conduct of such referendum is hereby
determined to be July 1, 2003, through
June 30, 2004.
The agent of the Secretary to conduct
such referendum is hereby designated to
be Susan Hiller and Gary Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1220 SW. Third Avenue,
room 385, Portland, Oregon 97204;
telephone (503) 326–2724.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 927
Marketing agreements, Winter pears,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 28, 2005.
Barry L. Carpenter,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
Order Amending the Order Regulating
the Handling of Winter Pears Grown in
Oregon and Washington 1
Findings and Determinations
The findings and determinations
hereinafter set forth are supplementary
to the findings and determinations
which were previously made in
connection with the issuance of the
marketing agreement and order; and all
said previous findings and
determinations are hereby ratified and
affirmed, except insofar as such findings
and determinations may be in conflict
with the findings and determinations set
forth herein.
1 This order shall not become effective unless and
until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of
practice and procedure governing proceedings to
formulate marketing agreements and marketing
orders have been met.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(a) Findings and Determinations Upon
the Basis of the Hearing Record.
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), and the applicable rules of
practice and procedure effective
thereunder (7 CFR part 900), a public
hearing was held upon the proposed
amendments to the Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 927 (7 CFR
part 927), regulating the handling of
winter pears grown in Oregon and
Washington. Upon the basis of the
evidence introduced at such hearing
and the record thereof, it is found that:
(1) The marketing agreement and
order, as amended, and as hereby
proposed to be further amended, and all
of the terms and conditions thereof,
would tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act;
(2) The marketing agreement and
order, as amended, and as hereby
proposed to be further amended,
regulate the handling of pears grown in
the production area in the same manner
as, and are applicable only to, persons
in the respective classes of commercial
and industrial activity specified in the
marketing agreement and order upon
which a hearing has been held;
(3) The marketing agreement and
order, as amended, and as hereby
proposed to be further amended, are
limited in their application to the
smallest regional production area which
is practicable, consistent with carrying
out the declared policy of the Act, and
the issuance of several orders applicable
to subdivisions of the production area
would not effectively carry out the
declared policy of the Act;
(4) The marketing agreement and
order, as amended, and as hereby
proposed to be further amended,
prescribe, insofar as practicable, such
different terms applicable to different
parts of the production area as are
necessary to give due recognition to the
differences in the production and
marketing of pears grown in the
production area; and
(5) All handling of pears grown in the
production area as defined in the
marketing agreement and order, is in the
current of interstate or foreign
commerce or directly burdens,
obstructs, or affects such commerce.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, That on and
after the effective date hereof, all
handling of pears grown in Oregon and
Washington shall be in conformity to,
and in compliance with, the terms and
conditions of the said order as hereby
proposed to be amended as follows:
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
The provisions of the proposed
marketing agreement and order
contained in the Recommended
Decision issued by the Administrator on
January 5, 2005, and published in the
Federal Register on January 13, 2005,
will be and are the terms and provisions
of this order amending the order and are
set forth in full herein.
specifically defined in a regulation
issued under this part.
7. Revise § 927.6 to read as follows:
PART 927—PEARS GROWN IN
OREGON AND WASHINGTON
§ 927.7
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 927 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Revise the heading of part 927 to
read as set forth above.
3. Revise § 927.1 to read as follows:
§ 927.1
Secretary.
Secretary means the Secretary of
Agriculture of the United States, or any
officer or employee of the Department of
Agriculture who has been delegated, or
to whom authority may hereafter be
delegated, the authority to act for the
Secretary.
4. Revise § 927.3 to read as follows:
§ 927.3
Person.
Person means an individual
partnership, corporation, association,
legal representative, or any other
business unit.
5. Revise § 927.4 to read as follows:
§ 927.4
Pears.
§ 927.5
Size.
Size means the number of pears
which can be packed in a 44-pound net
weight standard box or container
equivalent, or as ‘‘size’’ means the
greatest transverse diameter of the pear
taken at right angles to a line running
from the stem to the blossom end, or
such other specifications more
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Handler is synonymous with shipper
and means any person (except a
common or contract carrier transporting
pears owned by another person) who, as
owner, agent, broker, or otherwise, ships
or handles pears, or causes pears to be
shipped or handled by rail, truck, boat,
or any other means whatsoever.
9. Revise § 927.8 to read as follows:
Douglas, Grant, Lincoln, and Spokane in
the State of Washington, and all other
counties in Washington lying north
thereof.
(4) Yakima District shall include all of
the State of Washington, not included in
the Wenatchee District or in the MidColumbia District.
(b) For the purpose of committee
representation, administration and
application of provisions of this subpart
as applicable to pears for processing,
districts shall be defined as follows:
(1) The State of Washington.
(2) The State of Oregon.
(c) The Secretary, upon
recommendation of the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee, may reestablish districts
within the production area.
12. Revise § 927.13 to read as follows:
§ 927.8
§ 927.13
§ 927.6
Jkt 205001
Grower.
Grower is synonymous with producer
and means any person engaged in the
production of pears, either as owner or
as tenant.
8. Revise § 927.7 to read as follows:
Handler.
Ship or handle.
Ship or handle means to sell, deliver,
consign, transport or ship pears within
the production area or between the
production area and any point outside
thereof, including receiving pears for
processing: Provided, That the term
‘‘’handle’’’ shall not include the
transportation of pear shipments within
the production area from the orchard
where grown to a packing facility
located within the production area for
preparation for market or delivery for
processing.
10. Revise § 927.9 to read as follows:
§ 927.9
(a) Pears means and includes any and
all varieties or subvarieties of pears with
the genus Pyrus that are produced in the
production area and are classified as:
(1) Summer/fall pears including
Bartlett and Starkrimson pears;
(2) Winter pears including Beurre
D’Anjou, Beurre Bosc, Doyenne du
Comice, Concorde, Forelle, Winter
Nelis, Packham, Seckel, and Taylor’s
Gold pears; and
(3) Other pears including any or all
other varieties or subvarieties of pears
not classified as summer/fall or winter
pears.
(b) The Fresh Pear Committee and/or
the Processed Pear Committee, with the
approval of the Secretary, may recognize
new or delete obsolete varieties or
subvarieties for each category.
6. Revise § 927.5 to read as follows:
11159
Fiscal period.
Fiscal period means the period
beginning July 1 of any year and ending
June 30 of the following year or such
may be approved by the Secretary
pursuant to a joint recommendation by
the Fresh Pear Committee and the
Processed Pear Committee.
11. Revise § 927.11 to read as follows:
§ 927.11
District.
District means the applicable one of
the following-described subdivisions of
the production area covered by the
provisions of this subpart:
(a) For the purpose of committee
representation, administration and
application of provisions of this subpart
as applicable to pears for the fresh
market, districts shall be defined as
follows:
(1) Medford District shall include all
the counties in the State of Oregon
except for Hood River and Wasco
counties.
(2) Mid-Columbia District shall
include Hood River and Wasco counties
in the State of Oregon, and the counties
of Skamania and Klickitat in the State
of Washington.
(3) Wenatchee District shall include
the counties of King, Chelan, Okanogan,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Subvariety.
Subvariety means and includes any
mutation, sport, or other derivation of
any of the varieties covered in § 927.4
which is recognized by the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee and approved by the
Secretary. Recognition of a subvariety
shall include classification within a
varietal group for the purposes of votes
conducted under § 927.52.
13. Add a new § 927.14 to read as
follows:
§ 927.14
Processor.
Processor means any person who as
owner, agent, broker, or otherwise,
commercially processes pears in the
production area.
14. Add a new § 927.15 to read as
follows:
§ 927.15
Process.
Process means to can, concentrate,
freeze, dehydrate, press or puree pears,
or in any other way convert pears
commercially into a processed product.
15. Revise the undesignated center
heading preceding § 927.20 to read as
follows:
Administrative Bodies
16. Revise § 927.20 to read as follows:
§ 927.20
Establishment and membership.
There are hereby established two
committees to administer the terms and
provisions of this subpart as specifically
provided in §§ 927.20 through 927.35:
(a) A Fresh Pear Committee,
consisting of 13 individual persons as
its members is established to administer
order provisions relating to the handling
of pears for the fresh market. Six
members of the Fresh Pear Committee
shall be growers, six members shall be
handlers, and one member shall
represent the public. For each member
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
11160
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
there shall be two alternates, designated
as the ‘‘first alternate’’ and the ‘‘second
alternate,’’ respectively. Each district
shall be represented by one grower
member and one handler member,
except that the Mid-Columbia District
and the Wenatchee District shall be
represented by two grower members and
two handler members.
(b) A Processed Pear Committee
consisting of 10 members is established
to administer order provisions relating
to the handling of pears for processing.
Three members of the Processed Pear
Committee shall be growers, three
members shall be handlers, three
members shall be processors, and one
member shall represent the public. For
each member there shall be two
alternates, designated as the ‘‘first
alternate’’ and the ‘‘second alternate,’’
respectively. District 1, the State of
Washington, shall be represented by two
grower members, two handler members
and two processor members. District 2,
the State of Oregon, shall be represented
by one grower member, one handler
member and one processor member.
(c) The Secretary, upon
recommendation of the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee may reapportion members
among districts, may change the number
of members and alternates, and may
change the composition by changing the
ratio of members, including their
alternates. In recommending any such
changes, the following shall be
considered:
(1) Shifts in pear acreage within
districts and within the production area
during recent years;
(2) The importance of new pear
production in its relation to existing
districts;
(3) The equitable relationship
between membership and districts;
(4) Economies to result for growers in
promoting efficient administration due
to redistricting or reapportionment of
members within districts; and
(5) Other relevant factors.
17. Revise § 927.21 to read as follows:
§ 927.21 Nomination and selection of
members and their respective alternates.
Grower members and their respective
alternates for each district shall be
selected by the Secretary from nominees
elected by the growers in such district.
Handler members and their respective
alternates for each district shall be
selected by the Secretary from nominees
elected by the handlers in such district.
Processor members and their respective
alternates shall be selected by the
Secretary from nominees elected by the
processors. Public members for each
committee shall be nominated by the
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed
Pear Committee, each independently,
and selected by the Secretary. The Fresh
Pear Committee and the Processed Pear
Committee may, each independently,
prescribe such additional qualifications,
administrative rules and procedures for
selection for each candidate as it deems
necessary and as the Secretary approves.
18. Revise § 927.22 to read as follows:
§ 927.22 Meetings for election of
nominees.
(a) Nominations for members of the
Fresh Pear Committee and their
alternates shall be made at meetings of
growers and handlers held in each of
the districts designated in § 927.11 at
such times and places designated by the
Fresh Pear Committee.
(b) Nominations for grower and
handler members of the Processed Pear
Committee and their alternates shall be
made at meetings of growers and
handlers held in each of the districts
designated in § 927.11 at such times and
places designated by the Processed Pear
Committee. Nominations for processor
members of the Processed Pear
Committee and their alternates shall be
made at a meeting of processors at such
time and place designated by the
Processed Pear Committee.
19. Revise § 927.23 to read as follows:
§ 927.23
Voting.
Only growers in attendance at
meetings for election of nominees shall
participate in the nomination of grower
members and their alternates, and only
handlers in attendance at meetings for
election of nominees shall participate in
the nomination of handler members and
their alternates, and only processors in
attendance for election of nominees
shall participate in the nomination of
processor members and their alternates.
A grower may participate only in the
election held in the district in which he
or she produces pears, and a handler
may participate only in the election
held in the district in which he or she
handles pears. Each person may vote as
a grower, handler or processor, but not
a combination thereof. Each grower,
handler and processor shall be entitled
to cast one vote, on behalf of himself,
his agents, partners, affiliates,
subsidiaries, and representatives, for
each nominee to be elected.
20. Revise § 927.24 to read as follows:
§ 927.24
Eligibility for membership.
Each grower member and each of his
or her alternates shall be a grower, or an
officer or employee of a corporate or
LLC grower, who grows pears in the
district in which and for which he or
she is nominated and selected. Each
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
handler member and each of his or her
alternates shall be a handler, or an
officer or employee of a handler,
handling pears in the district in and for
which he or she is nominated and
selected. Each processor member and
each of their alternates shall be a
processor, or an officer or employee of
a processor, who processes pears in the
production area.
21. Revise § 927.26 to read as follows:
§ 927.26
Qualifications.
Any person prior to or within 15 days
after selection as a member or as an
alternate for a member of the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee shall qualify by filing with
the Secretary a written acceptance of the
person’s willingness to serve.
22. Revise § 927.27 to read as follows:
§ 927.27
Term of office.
The term of office of each member
and alternate member of the Fresh Pear
Committee and the Processed Pear
Committee shall be for two years
beginning July 1 and ending June 30:
Provided, That the terms of office of
one-half the initial members and
alternates shall end June 30, 2006; and
that beginning with the 2005–2006
fiscal period, no member shall serve
more than three consecutive two-year
terms unless specifically exempted by
the Secretary. Members and alternate
members shall serve in such capacities
for the portion of the term of office for
which they are selected and have
qualified and until their respective
successors are selected and have
qualified. The terms of office of
successor members and alternates shall
be so determined that one-half of the
total committee membership ends each
June 30.
23. Revise § 927.28 to read as follows:
§ 927.28
Alternates for members.
The first alternate for a member shall
act in the place and stead of the member
for whom he or she is an alternate
during such member’s absence. In the
event of the death, removal, resignation,
or disqualification of a member, his or
her first alternate shall act as a member
until a successor for the member is
selected and has qualified. The second
alternate for a member shall serve in the
place and stead of the member for
whom he or she is an alternate
whenever both the member and his or
her first alternate are unable to serve. In
the event that a member of the Fresh
Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee and both that member’s
alternates are unable to attend a
meeting, the member may designate any
other alternate member from the same
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
group (handler, processor, or grower) to
serve in that member’s place and stead.
24. Revise § 927.29 to read as follows:
§ 927.29
Vacancies.
To fill any vacancy occasioned by the
failure of any person selected as a
member or as an alternate for a member
of the Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee to qualify, or
in the event of death, removal,
resignation, or disqualification of any
qualified member or qualified alternate
for a member, a successor for his or her
unexpired term shall be nominated and
selected in the manner set forth in
§§ 927.20 to 927.35. If nominations to
fill any such vacancy are not made
within 20 days after such vacancy
occurs, the Secretary may fill such
vacancy without regard to nominations.
25. Revise § 927.30 to read as follows:
§ 927.30
Compensation and expenses.
The members and alternates for
members shall serve without
compensation, but may be reimbursed
for expenses necessarily incurred by
them in the performance of their
respective duties.
26. Revise § 927.31 to read as follows:
§ 927.31
Powers.
The Fresh Pear Committee and the
Processed Pear Committee shall have
the following powers to exercise each
independently:
(a) To administer, as specifically
provided in §§ 927.20 to 927.35, the
terms and provisions of this subpart:
(b) To make administrative rules and
regulations in accordance with, and to
effectuate, the terms and provisions of
this subpart; and
(c) To receive, investigate, and report
to the Secretary complaints of violations
of the provisions of this subpart.
27. Revise § 927.32 to read as follows:
§ 927.32
Duties.
The duties of the Fresh Pear
Committee and the Processed Pear
Committee, each independently, shall
be as follows:
(a) To act as intermediary between the
Secretary and any grower, handler or
processor;
(b) To keep minutes, books, and
records which will reflect clearly all of
the acts and transactions. The minutes,
books, and records shall be subject at
any time to examination by the
Secretary or by such person as may be
designated by the Secretary;
(c) To investigate, from time to time,
and to assemble data on the growing,
harvesting, shipping, and marketing
conditions relative to pears, and to
furnish to the Secretary such available
information as may be requested;
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
(d) To perform such duties as may be
assigned to it from time to time by the
Secretary in connection with the
administration of section 32 of the Act
to amend the Agricultural Adjustment
Act, and for other purposes, Public Act
No. 320, 74th Congress, approved
August 24, 1935 (49 Stat. 774), as
amended;
(e) To cause the books to be audited
by one or more competent accountants
at the end of each fiscal year and at such
other times as the Fresh Pear Committee
or the Processed Pear Committee may
deem necessary or as the Secretary may
request, and to file with the Secretary
copies of any and all audit reports
made;
(f) To appoint such employees agents,
and representatives as it may deem
necessary, and to determine the
compensation and define the duties of
each;
(g) To give the Secretary, or the
designated agent of the Secretary, the
same notice of meetings as is given to
the members of the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee;
(h) To select a chairman of the Fresh
Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee and, from time to time, such
other officers as it may deem advisable
and to define the duties of each; and
(i) To submit to the Secretary as soon
as practicable after the beginning of
each fiscal period, a budget for such
fiscal year, including a report in
explanation of the items appearing
therein and a recommendation as to the
rate of assessment for such period.
28. Revise § 927.33 to read as follows:
§ 927.33
Procedure.
(a) Quorum and voting. A quorum at
a meeting of the Fresh Pear Committee
or the Processed Pear Committee shall
consist of 75 percent of the number of
committee members, or alternates then
serving in the place of any members,
respectively. Except as otherwise
provided in § 927.52, all decisions of the
Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed
Pear Committee at any meeting shall
require the concurring vote of at least 75
percent of those members present,
including alternates then serving in the
place of any members.
(b) Mail voting. The Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee may provide for members
voting by mail, telecopier or other
electronic means, telephone, or
telegraph, upon due notice to all
members. Promptly after voting by
telephone or telegraph, each member
thus voting shall confirm in writing, the
vote so cast.
29. Revise § 927.34 to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 927.34
11161
Right of the Secretary.
The members and alternates for
members and any agent or employee
appointed or employed by the Fresh
Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee shall be subject to removal
or suspension by the Secretary at any
time. Each and every regulation,
decision, determination, or other act
shall be subject to the continuing right
of the Secretary to disapprove of the
same at any time, and, upon such
disapproval, shall be deemed null and
void, except as to acts done in reliance
thereon or in compliance therewith
prior to such disapproval by the
Secretary.
30. Revise § 927.35 to read as follows:
§ 927.35
Funds and other property.
(a) All funds received pursuant to any
of the provisions of this subpart shall be
used solely for the purposes specified in
this subpart, and the Secretary may
require the Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee and its
members to account for all receipts and
disbursements.
(b) Upon the death, resignation,
removal, disqualification, or expiration
of the term of office of any member or
employee, all books, records, funds, and
other property in his or her possession
belonging to the Fresh Pear Committee
or the Processed Pear Committee shall
be delivered to his or her successor in
office or to the Fresh Pear Committee or
Processed Pear Committee, and such
assignments and other instruments shall
be executed as may be necessary to vest
in such successor or in the Fresh Pear
Committee or Processed Pear Committee
full title to all the books, records, funds,
and other property in the possession or
under the control of such member or
employee pursuant to this subpart.
31. Remove § 927.36, Public advisors.
32. Revise § 927.40 to read as follows:
§ 927.40
Expenses.
The Fresh Pear Committee and the
Processed Pear Committee are
authorized, each independently, to
incur such expenses as the Secretary
finds may be necessary to carry out their
functions under this subpart. The funds
to cover such expenses shall be acquired
by the levying of assessments as
provided in § 927.41.
33. Revise § 927.41 to read as follows:
§ 927.41
Assessments.
(a) Assessments will be levied only
upon handlers who first handle pears.
Each handler shall pay assessments on
all pears handled by such handler as the
pro rata share of the expenses which the
Secretary finds are reasonable and likely
to be incurred by the Fresh Pear
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
11162
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee during a fiscal period. The
payment of assessments for the
maintenance and functioning of the
Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed
Pear Committee may be required under
this part throughout the period such
assessments are payable irrespective of
whether particular provisions thereof
are suspended or become inoperative.
(b)(1) Based upon a recommendation
of the Fresh Pear Committee or other
available data, the Secretary shall fix
three base rates of assessment for pears
that handlers shall pay on pears
handled for the fresh market during
each fiscal period. Such base rates shall
include one rate of assessment for any
or all varieties or subvarieties of pears
classified as summer/fall; one rate of
assessment for any or all varieties or
subvarieties of pears, classified as
winter; and one rate of assessment for
any or all varieties or subvarieties of
pears classified as other. Upon
recommendation of the Fresh Pear
Committee or other available data, the
Secretary may also fix supplemental
rates of assessment on individual
varieties or subvarieties categorized
within the above-defined assessment
classifications to secure sufficient funds
to provide for projects authorized under
§ 927.47. At any time during the fiscal
period when it is determined on the
basis of a Fresh Pear Committee
recommendation or other information
that different rates are necessary for
fresh pears or for any varieties or
subvarieties, the Secretary may modify
those rates of assessment and such new
rate shall apply to any or all varieties or
subvarieties that are shipped during the
fiscal period for fresh market.
(2) Based upon a recommendation of
the Processed Pear Committee or other
available data, the Secretary shall fix
three base rates of assessment for pears
that handlers shall pay on pears
handled for processing during each
fiscal period. Such base rates shall
include one rate of assessment for any
or all varieties or subvarieties of pears
classified as summer/fall; one rate of
assessment for any or all varieties or
subvarieties of pears, classified as
winter; and one rate of assessment for
any or all varieties or subvarieties of
pears classified as other. Upon
recommendation of the Processed Pear
Committee or other available data, the
Secretary may also fix supplemental
rates of assessment on individual
varieties or subvarieties categorized
within the above-defined assessment
classifications to secure sufficient funds
to provide for projects authorized under
§ 927.47. At any time during the fiscal
period when it is determined on the
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
basis of a Processed Pear Committee
recommendation or other information
that different rates are necessary for
pears for processing or for any varieties
or subvarieties, the Secretary may
modify those rates of assessment and
such new rate shall apply to any or all
varieties or subvarieties of pears that are
shipped during the fiscal period for
processing.
(c) Based on the recommendation of
the Fresh Pear Committee, the Processed
Pear Committee or other available data,
the Secretary may establish additional
base rates of assessments, or change or
modify the base rate classifications
defined in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
section.
(d) The Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee may impose
a late payment charge on any handler
who fails to pay any assessment within
the time prescribed. In the event the
handler thereafter fails to pay the
amount outstanding, including the late
payment charge, within the prescribed
time, the Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee may impose
an additional charge in the form of
interest on such outstanding amount.
The Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee, with the
approval of the Secretary, shall
prescribe the amount of such late
payment charge and rate of interest.
(e) In order to provide funds to carry
out the functions of the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee prior to commencement of
shipments in any season, handlers may
make advance payments of assessments,
which advance payments shall be
credited to such handlers and the
assessments of such handlers shall be
adjusted so that such assessments are
based upon the quantity of each variety
or subvariety of pears handled by such
handlers during such season. Further,
payment discounts may be authorized
by the Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee upon the
approval of the Secretary to handlers
making such advance assessment
payments.
34. Revise § 927.42 to read as follows:
§ 927.42
Accounting.
(a) If, at the end of a fiscal period, the
assessments collected are in excess of
expenses incurred, the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee may carryover such excess
into subsequent fiscal periods as a
reserve: Provided, That funds already in
the reserve do not exceed approximately
one fiscal period’s expenses. Such
reserve may be used to cover any
expense authorized under this part and
to cover necessary expenses of
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
liquidation in the event of termination
of this part. Any such excess not
retained in a reserve or applied to any
outstanding obligation of the person
from whom it was collected shall be
refunded proportionately to the persons
from whom it was collected. Upon
termination of this part, any funds not
required to defray the necessary
expenses of liquidation shall be
disposed of in such manner as the
Secretary may determine to be
appropriate: Provided, That to the extent
practical, such funds shall be returned
pro rata to the persons from whom such
funds were collected.
(b) All funds received pursuant to the
provisions of this part shall be used
solely for the purpose specified in this
part and shall be accounted for in the
manner provided in this part. The
Secretary may at any time require the
Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed
Pear Committee and its members to
account for all receipts and
disbursements.
35. Revise § 927.43 to read as follows:
§ 927.43
Use of funds.
From the funds acquired pursuant to
§ 927.41 the Fresh Pear Committee and
the Processed Pear Committee, each
independently, shall pay the salaries of
its employees, if any, and pay the
expenses necessarily incurred in the
performance of the duties of the Fresh
Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee.
36. Remove § 927.44, Collection of
unpaid assessments.
37. Revise § 927.45 to read as follows:
§ 927.45
Contributions.
The Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee may accept
voluntary contributions but these shall
only be used to pay expenses incurred
pursuant to § 927.47. Furthermore, such
contributions shall be free from any
encumbrances by the donor and the
Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed
Pear Committee shall retain complete
control of their use.
38. Revise § 927.47 to read as follows:
§ 927.47
Research and development.
The Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee, with the
approval of the Secretary, may establish
or provide for the establishment of
production and post-harvest research, or
marketing research and development
projects designed to assist, improve, or
promote the marketing, distribution,
and consumption of pears. Such
projects may provide for any form of
marketing promotion, including paid
advertising. The expense of such
projects shall be paid from funds
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
collected pursuant to §§ 927.41 and
927.45. Expenditures for a particular
variety or subvariety of pears shall
approximate the amount of assessments
and voluntary contributions collected
for that variety or subvariety of pears.
39. Revise § 927.50 to read as follows:
§ 927.50
Marketing policy.
(a) It shall be the duty of the Fresh
Pear Committee to investigate, from
time to time, supply and demand
conditions relative to pears and each
grade, size, and quality of each variety
or subvariety thereof. Such
investigations shall be with respect to
the following:
(1) Estimated production of each
variety or subvariety of pears and of
each grade, size, and quality thereof;
(2) Prospective supplies and prices of
pears and other fruits, both in fresh and
processed form, which are competitive
to the marketing of pears;
(3) Prospective exports of pears and
imports of pears from other producing
areas;
(4) Probable harvesting period for
each variety or subvariety of pears;
(5) The trend and level of consumer
income;
(6) General economic conditions; and
(7) Other relevant factors.
(b) On or before August 1 of each year,
the Fresh Pear Committee shall
recommend regulations to the Secretary
if it finds, on the basis of the foregoing
investigations, that such regulation as is
provided in § 927.51 will tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the act.
(c) In the event the Fresh Pear
Committee at any time finds that by
reason of changed conditions any
regulation issued pursuant to § 927.51
should be modified, suspended, or
terminated, it shall so recommend to the
Secretary.
40. Revise § 927.51 to read as follows:
§ 927.51 Issuance of regulations; and
modification, suspension, or termination
thereof.
(a) Whenever the Secretary finds,
from the recommendations and
information submitted by the Fresh Pear
Committee, or from other available
information, that regulation, in the
manner specified in this section, of the
shipment of fresh pears would tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the act,
he or she shall so limit the shipment of
such pears during a specified period or
periods. Such regulation may:
(1) Limit the total quantity of any
grade, size, quality, or combinations
thereof, of any variety or subvariety of
pears grown in any district and may
prescribe different requirements
applicable to shipments to different
export markets;
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
(2) Limit, during any period or
periods, the shipment of any particular
grade, size, quality, or any combination
thereof, of any variety or subvariety, of
pears grown in any district or districts
of the production area; and
(3) Provide a method, through rules
and regulation issued pursuant to this
part, for fixing markings on the
container or containers, which may be
used in the packaging or handling of
pears, including appropriate logo or
other container markings to identify the
contents thereof.
(b) Whenever the Secretary finds,
from the recommendations and
information submitted by the Fresh Pear
Committee, or from other available
information, that a regulation should be
modified, suspended, or terminated
with respect to any or all shipments of
fresh pears grown in any district in
order to effectuate the declared policy of
the act, he or she shall so modify,
suspend, or terminate such regulation. If
the Secretary finds, from the
recommendations and information
submitted by the Fresh Pear Committee,
or from other available information, that
a regulation obstructs or does not tend
to effectuate the declared policy of the
act, he or she shall suspend or terminate
such regulation. On the same basis and
in like manner, the Secretary may
terminate any such modification or
suspension.
41. Revise § 927.52 to read as follows:
§ 927.52 Prerequisites to
recommendations.
(a) Decisions of the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee with respect to any
recommendations to the Secretary
pursuant to the establishment or
modification of a supplemental rate of
assessment for an individual variety or
subvariety of pears shall be made by
affirmative vote of not less than 75
percent of the applicable total number
of votes, computed in the manner
hereinafter described in this section, of
all members. Decisions of the Fresh Pear
Committee pursuant to the provisions of
§ 927.50 shall be made by an affirmative
vote of not less than 80 percent of the
applicable total number of votes,
computed in the manner hereinafter
prescribed in this section, of all
members.
(b) With respect to a particular variety
or subvariety of pears, the applicable
total number of votes shall be the
aggregate of the votes allotted to the
members in accordance with the
following: Each member shall have one
vote as an individual and, in addition,
shall have a vote equal to the percentage
of the vote of the district represented by
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11163
such member; and such district vote
shall be computed as soon as practical
after the beginning of each fiscal period
on either:
(1) The basis of one vote for each
25,000 boxes (except 2,500 boxes for
varieties or subvarieties with less than
200,000 standard boxes or container
equivalents) of the average quantity of
such variety or subvariety produced in
the particular district and shipped
therefrom during the immediately
preceding three fiscal periods; or
(2) Such other basis as the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee may recommend and the
Secretary may approve. The votes so
allotted to a member may be cast by
such member on each recommendation
relative to the variety or subvariety of
pears on which such votes were
computed.
42. Revise § 927.53 to read as follows:
§ 927.53
Notification.
(a) The Fresh Pear Committee shall
give prompt notice to growers and
handlers of each recommendation to the
Secretary pursuant to the provisions of
§ 927.50.
(b) The Secretary shall immediately
notify the Fresh Pear Committee of the
issuance of each regulation and of each
modification, suspension, or
termination of a regulation and the
Fresh Pear Committee shall give prompt
notice thereof to growers and handlers.
42a. Remove § 927.54, Exemption
certificates.
43. Amend § 927.60 by revising
paragraph (a) and adding a new
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 927.60
Inspection and certification.
(a) Handlers shall ship only fresh
pears inspected by the Federal-State
Inspection Service or under a program
developed by the Federal-State
Inspection Service: except, that such
inspection and certification of
shipments of pears may be performed by
such other inspection service as the
Fresh Pear Committee, with the
approval of the Secretary, may
designate. Promptly after shipment of
any pears, the handler shall submit, or
cause to be submitted, to the Fresh Pear
Committee a copy of the inspection
certificate issued on such shipment.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The Fresh Pear Committee may,
with the approval of the Secretary,
prescribe rules and regulations
modifying or eliminating the
requirement for mandatory inspection
and certification of shipments:
Provided, That an adequate method of
ensuring compliance with quality and
size requirements is developed.
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
11164
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
44. Revise § 927.65 to read as follows:
§ 927.65
Exemption from regulation.
(a) Nothing contained in this subpart
shall limit or authorize the limitation of
shipment of pears for consumption by
charitable institutions or distribution by
relief agencies, nor shall any assessment
be computed on pears so shipped. The
Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed
Pear Committee may prescribe
regulations to prevent pears shipped for
either of such purposes from entering
commercial channels of trade contrary
to the provisions of this subpart.
(b) The Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee may
prescribe rules and regulations, to
become effective upon the approval of
the Secretary, whereby quantities of
pears or types of pear shipments may be
exempted from any or all provisions of
this subpart.
45. Revise § 927.70 to read as follows:
§ 927.70
Reports.
(a) Upon the request of the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee, and subject to the approval
of the Secretary, each handler shall
furnish to the aforesaid committee,
respectively, in such manner and at
such times as it prescribes, such
information as will enable it to perform
its duties under this subpart.
(b) All such reports shall be held
under appropriate protective
classification and custody by the Fresh
Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee, or duly appointed
employees thereof, so that the
information contained therein which
may adversely affect the competitive
position of any handler in relation to
other handlers will not be disclosed.
Compilations of general reports from
data submitted by handlers are
authorized subject to the prohibition of
disclosure of individual handler’s
identities or operations.
(c) Each handler shall maintain for at
least two succeeding years such records
of the pears received and of pears
disposed of, by such handler as may be
necessary to verify reports pursuant to
this section.
46. Revise § 927.75 to read as follows:
§ 927.75
Liability.
No member or alternate for a member
of the Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee, nor any
employee or agent thereof, shall be held
personally responsible, either
individually or jointly with others, in
any way whatsoever, to any party under
this subpart or to any other person for
errors in judgment, mistakes, or other
acts, either of commission or omission,
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
as such member, alternate for a member,
agent or employee, except for acts of
dishonesty, willful misconduct, or gross
negligence.
47. Revise § 927.76 to read as follows:
§ 927.76
Agents.
The Secretary may name, by
designation in writing, any person,
including any officer or employee of the
Government or any bureau or division
in the Department of Agriculture to act
as his or her agent or representative in
connection with any of the provisions of
this subpart.
48. Revise § 927.77 to read as follows:
§ 927.77
Effective time.
The provisions of this subpart and of
any amendment thereto shall become
effective at such time as the Secretary
may declare, and shall continue in force
until terminated in one of the ways
specified in § 927.78.
49. Amend § 927.78 by revising
paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) to read as
follows:
§ 927.78
Termination.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The Secretary shall terminate or
suspend the operation of any or all of
the provisions of this subpart whenever
he or she finds that such operation
obstructs or does not tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the act.
(c) The Secretary shall terminate the
provisions of this subpart applicable to
fresh pears for market or pears for
processing at the end of any fiscal
period whenever the Secretary finds, by
referendum or otherwise, that such
termination is favored by a majority of
growers of fresh pears for market or
pears for processing, respectively:
Provided, That such majority has during
such period produced more than 50
percent of the volume of fresh pears for
market or pears for processing,
respectively, in the production area.
Such termination shall be effective only
if announced on or before the last day
of the then current fiscal period.
(d) The Secretary shall conduct a
referendum within every six-year period
beginning on the date this section
becomes effective, to ascertain whether
continuance of the provisions of this
subpart applicable to fresh pears for
market or pears for processing are
favored by producers of pears for the
fresh market and pears for processing,
respectively. The Secretary may
terminate the provisions of this subpart
at the end of any fiscal period in which
the Secretary has found that
continuance of this subpart is not
favored by producers who, during a
representative period determined by the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Secretary, have been engaged in the
production of fresh pears for market or
pears for processing in the production
area: Provided, That termination of the
order shall be effective only if
announced on or before the last day of
the then current fiscal period.
*
*
*
*
*
50. Revise § 927.79 to read as follows:
§ 927.79
Proceedings after termination.
(a) Upon the termination of this
subpart, the members of the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee then functioning shall
continue as joint trustees for the
purpose of liquidating all funds and
property then in the possession or under
the control of the Fresh Pear Committee
or the Processed Pear Committee,
including claims for any funds unpaid
or property not delivered at the time of
such termination.
(b) The joint trustees shall continue in
such capacity until discharged by the
Secretary; from time to time account for
all receipts and disbursements; deliver
all funds and property on hand, together
with all books and records of the Fresh
Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee and of the joint trustees, to
such person as the Secretary shall
direct; and, upon the request of the
Secretary, execute such assignments or
other instruments necessary and
appropriate to vest in such person full
title and right to all of the funds,
property, or claims vested in the Fresh
Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee or in said joint trustees.
(c) Any funds collected pursuant to
this subpart and held by such joint
trustees or such person over and above
the amounts necessary to meet
outstanding obligations and the
expenses necessarily incurred by the
joint trustees or such other person in the
performance of their duties under this
subpart, as soon as practicable after the
termination hereof, shall be returned to
the handlers pro rata in proportion to
their contributions thereto.
(d) Any person to whom funds,
property, or claims have been
transferred or delivered by the Fresh
Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee or its members, upon
direction of the Secretary, as provided
in this section, shall be subject to the
same obligations and duties with
respect to said funds, property, or
claims as are imposed upon the
members or upon said joint trustees.
51. Revise § 927.80 to read as follows:
§ 927.80
Amendments.
Amendments to this subpart may be
proposed from time to time by the Fresh
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee or by the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–4306 Filed 3–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–20511; Directorate
Identifier 2004–SW–32–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta
S.p.A. Model A109E Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This document proposes
adopting a new airworthiness directive
(AD) for Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model
A109E helicopters. This proposal would
require, within 5 hours time-in-service
(TIS), locating relay K7212 and its
associated cable in the overhead panel
assembly and visually inspecting the
electrical cable in the splice area for
arcing or burns. If arcing or burns are
found, this proposal would require,
before further flight, replacing an
unairworthy cable with an airworthy
cable kit. This proposal is prompted by
an overhead panel inspection report of
incorrect crimping of the pins on the
cable that connects to the relay. An
electrical cable fault during assembly
could result in arcing or burning of the
cable junction at a relay in the overhead
electrical panel. The actions specified
by this proposed AD are intended to
detect arcing or burns of the cable or
relay and to prevent burning of the cable
junction at a relay, a fire in the cockpit,
and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before May 9, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD:
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically;
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically;
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590;
DATES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:31 Mar 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
• Fax: (202) 493–2251; or
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this proposed AD from
Agusta, 21017 Cascina Costa di
Samarate (VA) Italy, Via Giovanni
Agusta 520, telephone 39 (0331) 229111,
fax 39 (0331) 229605–222595.
You may examine the comments to
this proposed AD in the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carroll Wright, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Regulations and Guidance Group, Fort
Worth, Texas 76193–0111, telephone
(817) 222–5120, fax (817) 222–5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to submit any written
data, views, or arguments regarding this
proposed AD. Send your comments to
the address listed under the caption
ADDRESSES. Include the docket number
‘‘FAA–2005–20511, Directorate
Identifier 2004–SW–32–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed
rulemaking. Using the search function
of our docket Web site, you can find and
read the comments to any of our
dockets, including the name of the
individual who sent or signed the
comment. You may review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78), or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
Examining the Docket
You may examine the docket that
contains the proposed AD, any
comments, and other information in
person at the Docket Management
System (DMS) Docket Office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Office (telephone 1–800–647–
5227) is located at the plaza level of the
Department of Transportation NASSIF
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11165
Building in Room PL–401 at 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after the DMS receives
them.
Discussion
Ente Nazionale per l’Aiazione Civile
(ENAC), the airworthiness authority for
Italy, notified the FAA that an unsafe
condition may exist on Agusta Model
A109E helicopters. ENAC advises
carrying out the controls and
modification called for by Agusta
Bollettino Tecnico No. 109EP–22, dated
November 12, 2001 (BT 109EP–22).
Agusta has issued BT 109EP–22,
which specifies visually inspecting the
cable for the possible presence of arcing
or burns. If the presence of arcing or
burns are found, the BT specifies
modifying the direct current electrical
system bus bar connections with a kit,
P/N 109–0823–01–101.
ENAC classified this service bulletin
as mandatory and issued AD No. 2001–
481, dated November 13, 2001, to
ensure the continued airworthiness of
these helicopters in Italy.
This helicopter model is
manufactured in Italy and is type
certificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of 14 CFR
21.29 and the applicable bilateral
agreement. Pursuant to the applicable
bilateral agreement, Italy has kept us
informed of the situation described
above. We have examined the findings
of ENAC, reviewed all available
information, and determined that AD
action is necessary for products of this
type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
This previously described unsafe
condition is likely to exist or develop on
other helicopters of the same type
design registered in the United States.
Therefore, the proposed AD would
require, within 5 hours TIS, visually
inspecting the cable, P/N 109–0753–10,
for arcing and burns in the splice area
where it connects to relay K7212. If no
arcing or burns are found, no further
action would be required. If arcing or
burns are found, this AD would require,
before further flight, replacing the cable
with an airworthy cable kit, P/N 109–
0823–01–101, and testing the electrical
system. The actions would be required
to be done by following the service
bulletin described previously.
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 12 helicopters of U.S.
registry. The proposed actions would
take about 1/2 work hour to visually
inspect and 2.5 work hours to replace
the cable per helicopter at an average
labor rate of $65 per work hour.
Required parts would cost about $707.
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 8, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11155-11165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4306]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 8, 2005 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 11155]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 927
[Docket No. AO-F&V-927-A1; FV04-927-1 PR]
Winter Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Secretary's Decision
and Referendum Order on Proposed Amendments to Marketing Agreement and
Order No. 927
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This decision proposes amending the marketing agreement and
order (order) for winter pears grown in Oregon and Washington, and
provides producers with the opportunity to vote in a referendum to
determine if they favor the changes. The amendments are based on
recommendations jointly proposed by the Winter Pear Control Committee
and the Northwest Fresh Bartlett Marketing Committee, which are
responsible for local administration of orders 927 and 931,
respectively. Marketing Agreement and Order No. 931 regulates the
handling of fresh Bartlett pears grown in Oregon and Washington. The
amendments would combine the winter pear and fresh Bartlett orders into
a single program under marketing order 927, and would add authority to
assess pears for processing. All of the proposals are intended to
streamline industry organization and improve the administration,
operation, and functioning of the program.
DATES: The referendum will be conducted from March 22 through April 8,
2005. The representative period for the purpose of the referendum is
July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Schmaedick, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural
Marketing Service, USDA, Post Office Box 1035, Moab, UT 84532,
telephone: (435) 259-7988, fax: (435) 259-4945.
Small businesses may request information on this proceeding by
contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; telephone: (202) 720-2491, fax: (202)
720-8938.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior documents in this proceeding: Notice
of Hearing issued on March 24, 2004, and published in the March 30,
2004, issue of the Federal Register (69 FR 16501), and a Recommended
Decision issued on January 5, 2005, and published in the January 13,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 2520).
This action is governed by the provisions of sections 556 and 557
of title 5 of the United States Code and is therefore excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
Preliminary Statement
The amendments are based on the record of a public hearing held on
April 13 and 14, 2004, in Yakima, Washington and on April 16, 2004, in
Portland, Oregon. The hearing was held to consider the proposed
amendment of Marketing Agreement and Order No. 927, regulating the
handling of winter pears grown in the States of Oregon and Washington,
hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The hearing was held pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.),
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act,'' and the applicable rules of
practice and procedure governing the formulation of marketing
agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR part 900).
Notice of this hearing was published in the Federal Register on
March 30, 2004 (69 FR 16501). The notice of hearing contained order
changes proposed by both the Winter Pear Control Committee and the
Northwest Fresh Bartlett Marketing Committee, which are responsible for
local administration of orders 927 and 931, respectively. Marketing
order 927 regulates the handling of winter pears grown in Oregon and
Washington. Marketing order 931 regulates the handling of Bartlett
pears in the same production area.
The amendments included in this decision would:
1. Expand the definition of ``pears'' to include all varieties of
pears classified as summer/fall pears in addition to winter pears; add
Concorde, Packham, and Taylor's Gold pears to the current list of
winter pear varieties; and add a third category of pears which would
include varieties not classified as summer/fall or winter pears. This
amendment would extend program coverage to all pears grown in Oregon
and Washington.
2. Revise the definition of ``size'' to include language currently
used within the industry.
3. Extend the order's coverage to pears for processing by revising
the definition of ``handle,'' and adding definitions of ``processor''
and ``process.''
4. Establish districts for pears for processing. This amendment
would divide the order's production area into two districts for pears
for processing: one being the State of Oregon and the other being the
State of Washington.
5. Dissolve the current Winter Pear Control Committee and establish
two new administrative committees: The Fresh Pear Committee and the
Processed Pear Committee (Committees). This proposal would add a public
member and public alternate member seat to both of the newly
established Committees and would remove Section 927.36, Public
advisors. The Committees would coordinate administration of Marketing
Order 927, with each Committee recommending assessments and
administering program functions specific to their commodity.
Coordinated administration would allow each Committee to make decisions
on behalf of the commodity they represent, yet combine administrative
functions, when applicable, to maximize efficiencies and minimize
program costs.
Additionally, related changes would be made to order provisions
governing nomination and selection of members and their alternates,
terms of office, eligibility for membership, and quorum and voting
requirements, to reflect the proposed dual committee structure.
6. Authorize changes in the number of Committee members and
alternates, and allowing reapportionment of committee membership among
districts and groups (i.e., growers, handlers, and processors). Such
changes would require a Committee recommendation and approval by the
Department.
[[Page 11156]]
7. Add authority to establish assessment rates for each category of
pears, including: summer/fall pears, winter pears, and all other pears.
In addition, rates of assessment could be different for fresh pears and
pears for processing in each category, and could include supplemental
rates on individual varieties.
8. Add authority for container marking requirements for fresh
pears.
9. Remove the order provision allowing grower exemptions from
regulation. This is a tool no longer used by the industry and, thus, is
considered obsolete.
10. Amend Sec. 927.70, Reports, to update order language regarding
confidentiality requirements to conform to language under the Act.
11. Clarify inspection requirements and adding authority to
eliminate those requirements if an alternative, adequate method of
ensuring compliance with quality and size standards in effect under the
order can be developed.
12. Eliminate the current exemptions for pears for processing and
for pears shipped to storage warehouses.
13. Provide that separate continuance referenda be held every 6
years for fresh pears and processing pears.
14. Add the authority for the Committees to conduct post-harvest
research, in addition to production research and promotion (including
paid advertising).
15. Update several order provisions to make them more current.
16. Revise order provisions to reflect the two-committee structure
being recommended for administration of the program.
AMS also proposed to allow such changes as may be necessary to the
order, if any of the proposed changes are adopted, so that all of the
order's provisions conform to the effectuated amendments.
Upon the basis of evidence introduced at the hearing and the record
thereof, the Administrator of AMS on January 5, 2005, filed with the
Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, a Recommended Decision
and Opportunity to File Written Exceptions thereto by February 14,
2005. No comments were filed.
Small Business Consideration
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), AMS has considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final
regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders and amendments
thereto are unique in that they are normally brought about through
group action of essentially small entities for their own benefit. Thus,
both the RFA and the Act are compatible with respect to small entities.
Small agricultural producers have been defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA)(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000. Small agricultural service firms, which
include handlers regulated under the order, are defined as those with
annual receipts of less than $5,000,000.
Interested persons were invited to present evidence at the hearing
on the probable regulatory and informational impact of the proposed
amendments to the order on small businesses. The record evidence is
that most of the proposed amendments are designed to enhance industry
efficiencies and reduce costs, thereby improving grower returns.
The record indicates that there are approximately 1,850 pear
growers in Oregon and Washington. Of that total, 1,345 growers report
Bartlett or other summer/fall pear production, and 1,753 growers report
winter pear production. Two-year average NASS figures (the 2002 crop
year and preliminary figures for 2003) provides the following
production profile for Washington and Oregon, respectively: bearing
acres, 24,800 and 17,600; yield per acre, 16.8 tons and 11.8 tons;
annual production, 417,500 tons and 207,500 tons. Total acres planted
in pears for Washington and Oregon (including non-bearing acres) in
2002 were 26,586 and 22,822, respectively.
Summing average Washington and Oregon pear acreage for 2002 and
2003, and dividing by the number of growers (1,850), the estimated
average acreage per grower in the two-state area is 26.7 total acres
and 22.9 bearing acres. According to the 1997 Agricultural Census, the
average Oregon and Washington pear grower had approximately 23 and 15
total acres, respectively. The sum of average Washington and Oregon
pear production for 2002 and 2003, divided by the number of growers,
yields an estimated average production per grower in the two-state area
of 338 tons (676,000 pounds).
The average fresh market grower return for the two States has been
between 20 and 22 cents per pound in recent years, and between 10 and
12 cents per pound for processing. Estimated 2-year average pear sales
revenue per grower in the production area is approximately $101,000,
which is between \1/7\ and \1/8\ of the revenue that would qualify a
grower to be a large grower according to the SBA definition (if based
on pear sales alone). According to the hearing record, roughly 75
percent of the fresh pear producers in the States of Oregon and
Washington qualify as small producers. One witness stated that a 1,000-
acre farm represents the threshold between a small and a large producer
(a substantially different definition from what the SBA uses).
There are 55 handlers that handle fresh pears produced in Oregon
and Washington; 73 percent of these fall into the SBA definition of
``small business.'' There are five processing plants in the production
area, with one in Oregon and four in Washington. All five processors
are larger than the SBA's definition of small business. According to
information presented by processors testifying at the hearing, roughly
90 percent of pears received for processing come from small grower
entities.
The proposals put forth at the hearing would streamline industry
organization, but would not result in a significant change in industry
production, harvest or distribution activities. In discussing the
impacts of the proposed amendments on small growers and handlers,
witnesses indicated that the changes are expected to result in lower
costs.
If implemented, the amendments would result in the consolidation of
marketing orders 927 and 931, regulating fresh winter pears and summer/
fall pears, respectively. Program coverage would also be extended to
pears for processing. The combined programs would be administered by
two new administrative committees, one for fresh pears and one for
pears for processing. Cost savings could occur as a result of more
efficient coordination of administrative activities between the two
proposed committees.
Record evidence indicates the proposal to revise the order's
inspection provisions may result in cost savings for handlers. Handlers
within the production area typically have about 75 percent of their
product inspected on a voluntary basis. The remaining 25 percent
represents the amount of additional product that would be required to
be inspected if regulations were in effect.
Handler witnesses also reported that inspection costs average 12\1/
2\ cents per hundredweight, with a $9.00 minimum fee. In addition to
paying the inspection fee, handlers may also experience delays in
shipments while waiting for inspection to be completed. Handlers
[[Page 11157]]
indicated that such delays could be longer for smaller shippers that do
not have inspectors regularly stationed at their warehouses. This
proposal seeks to reduce these costs by allowing alternatives to
mandatory inspection.
Traditionally, the pear industry has used end-line inspection
procedures. Under this scenario, samples of packed pears are examined
at the end of the production process, and the results are certified by
Federally licensed inspectors. The record shows that in recent years,
the Federal-State Inspection Service has developed effective, less
costly alternatives to the end-line inspection program. One alternative
is the ``Partners in Quality'' program, a documented quality assurance
system. Under this program, individual packing houses must demonstrate
and document their ability to pack product that meets all relevant
quality requirements. Effectiveness of the program is verified through
periodic, unannounced audits of each packer's system by USDA-approved
auditors.
Another program recently developed is the Customer Assisted
Inspection Program (CAIP). Under CAIP, USDA inspectors oversee the in-
line sampling and inspection process performed by trained company
staff. USDA oversight ranges from periodic visits throughout the day to
a continuous on-site presence. Witnesses at the hearing testified that
the fresh pear industry should be able to utilize any method of
inspection acceptable to the Federal-State Inspection Service. These
alternative methods have been developed by USDA as a means of reducing
costs to industry. If this amendment were implemented, individual pear
handlers could choose the method of inspection best suited to their
operations, thereby possibly reducing costs associated with inspection.
Additionally, the authority to eliminate inspection requirements
could have handler cost implications. However, any increase or decrease
in costs could not be determined until specific alternative methods are
developed to assure compliance with any quality and size standards in
effect.
The proposal to authorize container marking requirements is not
expected to result in significant cost increases for fresh pear
handlers. Testimony indicated that packing facilities are already
configured for labeling and container marking. Witnesses noted that
there would be little, if any, need for equipment changes or additions.
Thus, the proposed change is not expected to have any adverse financial
impact related to handling fresh pears. It should be noted that the
proposed amendment would only grant the committees authority to
recommend container markings; implementation of this authority could be
done through informal rulemaking in the future. The amendment itself
would therefore not impose any new regulatory requirements on Oregon or
Washington fresh pear handlers.
Witnesses explained that the winter, summer/fall, fresh and
processed pear industries are closely inter-related. Growing,
harvesting, packing, processing and marketing activities of these
industries all impact each other. Thus, bringing all industry segments
together under a single marketing program would be beneficial for the
Oregon and Washington pear industry. Proponent witnesses stated that
the combined amendments, if implemented, would help to improve the
orderly marketing of product within the industry.
Similarly, coordinated marketing and distribution efforts for fresh
varieties that appear in the marketplace simultaneously would assist in
maximizing grower returns from each variety. While the industries
currently undertake coordinated marketing and promotional activities,
witnesses stated that combining these industries would further
synchronize activities and facilitate industry discussions and
decision-making.
The amendments would add authority to assess summer/fall pear
handlers and undertake promotional activities on their behalf in a
manner similar to that done currently for winter pears. When asked if
assuming this authority would be acceptable to the summer/fall pear
industry, witnesses supported promotional activities, including paid
generic advertising, as a way to boost sales and maintain market share.
Post-harvest research would also benefit the pear industries by
focusing on a section of the pear crop-to-market flow that, until now,
has not benefited from research activities. Improved storage techniques
resulting from industry-funded post-harvest research could benefit the
pear industry by decreasing the loss of product due to storage, or by
increasing the storability of product to help prolong the marketing
season.
A significant market-facilitating function carried out by the
current marketing order committees is the collection of statistical
data. That function would continue under the amended marketing order
and the authority to collect information would extend to additional
varieties that are currently produced. Flexibility is provided for
including other varieties in the future. Witnesses emphasized the
importance and value of collecting and disseminating accurate
statistical information to enable industry participants to make
economic and marketing decisions.
The proposal to establish two administrative committees also
includes the addition of a public member to each of those committees.
The benefit of adding a non-industry, consumer perspective to committee
deliberations and decision-making could prove very beneficial.
Witnesses stated that this additional perspective would improve the
committees' understanding of the consumer in the marketplace and could
enhance committee activities aimed at increasing consumer demand for
Oregon and Washington pears.
The addition of a public member to each committee is not expected
to result in any substantial cost increases. While these members would
be entitled to reimbursement for certain expenses allowed for under the
order, this expense is neither different nor any more burdensome than
the current reimbursement arrangement for committee members.
Interested persons were invited to present evidence at the hearing
on the probable regulatory and informational impact of the proposed
amendments to the order on small entities. The record evidence is that
most of the amendments are designed to reduce costs. While some of the
proposals could impose some minimal costs, those costs would be
outweighed by the benefits expected to accrue to the Oregon and
Washington pear industry.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
The Department has not identified any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this proposed rule. These
amendments are designed to enhance the administration and functioning
of the marketing order to the benefit of the industry.
Committee meetings regarding these proposals as well as the hearing
dates were widely publicized throughout the winter pear industry, and
all interested persons were invited to attend the meetings and the
hearing and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. All
Committee meetings and the hearing were public forums and all entities,
both large and small, were able to express views on these issues.
[[Page 11158]]
Current information collection requirements for part 927 are
approved by OMB under OMB number 0581-0089. Any changes in those
requirements as a result of this proceeding would be submitted to OMB
for approval. Witnesses stated that existing forms could be adequately
modified to serve the needs of the proposed fresh and processed pear
committees. While conforming changes to the forms would need to be made
(such as changing the name of the committee), the functionality of the
forms would remain the same. Therefore, there would be no modification
to reporting and recordkeeping burdens generated from these proposed
amendments.
Civil Justice Reform
The amendments to Marketing Agreement and Order 927 proposed herein
have been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform.
They are not intended to have retroactive effect. If adopted, the
proposed amendments would not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this proposal.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
Findings and Conclusions
The material issues, findings and conclusions, rulings, and general
findings and determinations included in the Recommended Decision set
forth in the January 13, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR
2520) are hereby approved and adopted.
Marketing Agreement and Order
Annexed hereto and made a part hereof is the document entitled
``Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Winter Pears
Grown in Oregon and Washington.'' This document has been decided upon
as the detailed and appropriate means of effectuating the foregoing
findings and conclusions.
It is hereby ordered, That this entire decision be published in the
Federal Register.
Referendum Order
It is hereby directed that a referendum be conducted in accordance
with the procedure for the conduct of referenda (7 CFR part 900.400 et
seq.) to determine whether the annexed order amending the order
regulating the handling of winter pears grown in Oregon and Washington
is approved or favored by producers, as defined under the terms of the
order, who during the representative period were engaged in the
production of pears in the production area.
The representative period for the conduct of such referendum is
hereby determined to be July 1, 2003, through June 30, 2004.
The agent of the Secretary to conduct such referendum is hereby
designated to be Susan Hiller and Gary Olson, Northwest Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW. Third Avenue, room 385, Portland, Oregon
97204; telephone (503) 326-2724.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 927
Marketing agreements, Winter pears, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 28, 2005.
Barry L. Carpenter,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Winter Pears Grown
in Oregon and Washington \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This order shall not become effective unless and until the
requirements of Sec. 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure
governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and
marketing orders have been met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Findings and Determinations
The findings and determinations hereinafter set forth are
supplementary to the findings and determinations which were previously
made in connection with the issuance of the marketing agreement and
order; and all said previous findings and determinations are hereby
ratified and affirmed, except insofar as such findings and
determinations may be in conflict with the findings and determinations
set forth herein.
(a) Findings and Determinations Upon the Basis of the Hearing
Record.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable
rules of practice and procedure effective thereunder (7 CFR part 900),
a public hearing was held upon the proposed amendments to the Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 927 (7 CFR part 927), regulating the handling
of winter pears grown in Oregon and Washington. Upon the basis of the
evidence introduced at such hearing and the record thereof, it is found
that:
(1) The marketing agreement and order, as amended, and as hereby
proposed to be further amended, and all of the terms and conditions
thereof, would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act;
(2) The marketing agreement and order, as amended, and as hereby
proposed to be further amended, regulate the handling of pears grown in
the production area in the same manner as, and are applicable only to,
persons in the respective classes of commercial and industrial activity
specified in the marketing agreement and order upon which a hearing has
been held;
(3) The marketing agreement and order, as amended, and as hereby
proposed to be further amended, are limited in their application to the
smallest regional production area which is practicable, consistent with
carrying out the declared policy of the Act, and the issuance of
several orders applicable to subdivisions of the production area would
not effectively carry out the declared policy of the Act;
(4) The marketing agreement and order, as amended, and as hereby
proposed to be further amended, prescribe, insofar as practicable, such
different terms applicable to different parts of the production area as
are necessary to give due recognition to the differences in the
production and marketing of pears grown in the production area; and
(5) All handling of pears grown in the production area as defined
in the marketing agreement and order, is in the current of interstate
or foreign commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such
commerce.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, That on and after the effective date
hereof, all handling of pears grown in Oregon and Washington shall be
in conformity to, and in compliance with, the terms and conditions of
the said order as hereby proposed to be amended as follows:
[[Page 11159]]
The provisions of the proposed marketing agreement and order
contained in the Recommended Decision issued by the Administrator on
January 5, 2005, and published in the Federal Register on January 13,
2005, will be and are the terms and provisions of this order amending
the order and are set forth in full herein.
PART 927--PEARS GROWN IN OREGON AND WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 927 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. Revise the heading of part 927 to read as set forth above.
3. Revise Sec. 927.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.1 Secretary.
Secretary means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States,
or any officer or employee of the Department of Agriculture who has
been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, the
authority to act for the Secretary.
4. Revise Sec. 927.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.3 Person.
Person means an individual partnership, corporation, association,
legal representative, or any other business unit.
5. Revise Sec. 927.4 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.4 Pears.
(a) Pears means and includes any and all varieties or subvarieties
of pears with the genus Pyrus that are produced in the production area
and are classified as:
(1) Summer/fall pears including Bartlett and Starkrimson pears;
(2) Winter pears including Beurre D'Anjou, Beurre Bosc, Doyenne du
Comice, Concorde, Forelle, Winter Nelis, Packham, Seckel, and Taylor's
Gold pears; and
(3) Other pears including any or all other varieties or
subvarieties of pears not classified as summer/fall or winter pears.
(b) The Fresh Pear Committee and/or the Processed Pear Committee,
with the approval of the Secretary, may recognize new or delete
obsolete varieties or subvarieties for each category.
6. Revise Sec. 927.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.5 Size.
Size means the number of pears which can be packed in a 44-pound
net weight standard box or container equivalent, or as ``size'' means
the greatest transverse diameter of the pear taken at right angles to a
line running from the stem to the blossom end, or such other
specifications more specifically defined in a regulation issued under
this part.
7. Revise Sec. 927.6 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.6 Grower.
Grower is synonymous with producer and means any person engaged in
the production of pears, either as owner or as tenant.
8. Revise Sec. 927.7 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.7 Handler.
Handler is synonymous with shipper and means any person (except a
common or contract carrier transporting pears owned by another person)
who, as owner, agent, broker, or otherwise, ships or handles pears, or
causes pears to be shipped or handled by rail, truck, boat, or any
other means whatsoever.
9. Revise Sec. 927.8 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.8 Ship or handle.
Ship or handle means to sell, deliver, consign, transport or ship
pears within the production area or between the production area and any
point outside thereof, including receiving pears for processing:
Provided, That the term ``'handle''' shall not include the
transportation of pear shipments within the production area from the
orchard where grown to a packing facility located within the production
area for preparation for market or delivery for processing.
10. Revise Sec. 927.9 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.9 Fiscal period.
Fiscal period means the period beginning July 1 of any year and
ending June 30 of the following year or such may be approved by the
Secretary pursuant to a joint recommendation by the Fresh Pear
Committee and the Processed Pear Committee.
11. Revise Sec. 927.11 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.11 District.
District means the applicable one of the following-described
subdivisions of the production area covered by the provisions of this
subpart:
(a) For the purpose of committee representation, administration and
application of provisions of this subpart as applicable to pears for
the fresh market, districts shall be defined as follows:
(1) Medford District shall include all the counties in the State of
Oregon except for Hood River and Wasco counties.
(2) Mid-Columbia District shall include Hood River and Wasco
counties in the State of Oregon, and the counties of Skamania and
Klickitat in the State of Washington.
(3) Wenatchee District shall include the counties of King, Chelan,
Okanogan, Douglas, Grant, Lincoln, and Spokane in the State of
Washington, and all other counties in Washington lying north thereof.
(4) Yakima District shall include all of the State of Washington,
not included in the Wenatchee District or in the Mid-Columbia District.
(b) For the purpose of committee representation, administration and
application of provisions of this subpart as applicable to pears for
processing, districts shall be defined as follows:
(1) The State of Washington.
(2) The State of Oregon.
(c) The Secretary, upon recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee
or the Processed Pear Committee, may reestablish districts within the
production area.
12. Revise Sec. 927.13 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.13 Subvariety.
Subvariety means and includes any mutation, sport, or other
derivation of any of the varieties covered in Sec. 927.4 which is
recognized by the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee
and approved by the Secretary. Recognition of a subvariety shall
include classification within a varietal group for the purposes of
votes conducted under Sec. 927.52.
13. Add a new Sec. 927.14 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.14 Processor.
Processor means any person who as owner, agent, broker, or
otherwise, commercially processes pears in the production area.
14. Add a new Sec. 927.15 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.15 Process.
Process means to can, concentrate, freeze, dehydrate, press or
puree pears, or in any other way convert pears commercially into a
processed product.
15. Revise the undesignated center heading preceding Sec. 927.20
to read as follows:
Administrative Bodies
16. Revise Sec. 927.20 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.20 Establishment and membership.
There are hereby established two committees to administer the terms
and provisions of this subpart as specifically provided in Sec. Sec.
927.20 through 927.35:
(a) A Fresh Pear Committee, consisting of 13 individual persons as
its members is established to administer order provisions relating to
the handling of pears for the fresh market. Six members of the Fresh
Pear Committee shall be growers, six members shall be handlers, and one
member shall represent the public. For each member
[[Page 11160]]
there shall be two alternates, designated as the ``first alternate''
and the ``second alternate,'' respectively. Each district shall be
represented by one grower member and one handler member, except that
the Mid-Columbia District and the Wenatchee District shall be
represented by two grower members and two handler members.
(b) A Processed Pear Committee consisting of 10 members is
established to administer order provisions relating to the handling of
pears for processing. Three members of the Processed Pear Committee
shall be growers, three members shall be handlers, three members shall
be processors, and one member shall represent the public. For each
member there shall be two alternates, designated as the ``first
alternate'' and the ``second alternate,'' respectively. District 1, the
State of Washington, shall be represented by two grower members, two
handler members and two processor members. District 2, the State of
Oregon, shall be represented by one grower member, one handler member
and one processor member.
(c) The Secretary, upon recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee
or the Processed Pear Committee may reapportion members among
districts, may change the number of members and alternates, and may
change the composition by changing the ratio of members, including
their alternates. In recommending any such changes, the following shall
be considered:
(1) Shifts in pear acreage within districts and within the
production area during recent years;
(2) The importance of new pear production in its relation to
existing districts;
(3) The equitable relationship between membership and districts;
(4) Economies to result for growers in promoting efficient
administration due to redistricting or reapportionment of members
within districts; and
(5) Other relevant factors.
17. Revise Sec. 927.21 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.21 Nomination and selection of members and their respective
alternates.
Grower members and their respective alternates for each district
shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees elected by the growers
in such district. Handler members and their respective alternates for
each district shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees elected
by the handlers in such district. Processor members and their
respective alternates shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees
elected by the processors. Public members for each committee shall be
nominated by the Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee,
each independently, and selected by the Secretary. The Fresh Pear
Committee and the Processed Pear Committee may, each independently,
prescribe such additional qualifications, administrative rules and
procedures for selection for each candidate as it deems necessary and
as the Secretary approves.
18. Revise Sec. 927.22 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.22 Meetings for election of nominees.
(a) Nominations for members of the Fresh Pear Committee and their
alternates shall be made at meetings of growers and handlers held in
each of the districts designated in Sec. 927.11 at such times and
places designated by the Fresh Pear Committee.
(b) Nominations for grower and handler members of the Processed
Pear Committee and their alternates shall be made at meetings of
growers and handlers held in each of the districts designated in Sec.
927.11 at such times and places designated by the Processed Pear
Committee. Nominations for processor members of the Processed Pear
Committee and their alternates shall be made at a meeting of processors
at such time and place designated by the Processed Pear Committee.
19. Revise Sec. 927.23 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.23 Voting.
Only growers in attendance at meetings for election of nominees
shall participate in the nomination of grower members and their
alternates, and only handlers in attendance at meetings for election of
nominees shall participate in the nomination of handler members and
their alternates, and only processors in attendance for election of
nominees shall participate in the nomination of processor members and
their alternates. A grower may participate only in the election held in
the district in which he or she produces pears, and a handler may
participate only in the election held in the district in which he or
she handles pears. Each person may vote as a grower, handler or
processor, but not a combination thereof. Each grower, handler and
processor shall be entitled to cast one vote, on behalf of himself, his
agents, partners, affiliates, subsidiaries, and representatives, for
each nominee to be elected.
20. Revise Sec. 927.24 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.24 Eligibility for membership.
Each grower member and each of his or her alternates shall be a
grower, or an officer or employee of a corporate or LLC grower, who
grows pears in the district in which and for which he or she is
nominated and selected. Each handler member and each of his or her
alternates shall be a handler, or an officer or employee of a handler,
handling pears in the district in and for which he or she is nominated
and selected. Each processor member and each of their alternates shall
be a processor, or an officer or employee of a processor, who processes
pears in the production area.
21. Revise Sec. 927.26 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.26 Qualifications.
Any person prior to or within 15 days after selection as a member
or as an alternate for a member of the Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee shall qualify by filing with the Secretary a
written acceptance of the person's willingness to serve.
22. Revise Sec. 927.27 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.27 Term of office.
The term of office of each member and alternate member of the Fresh
Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee shall be for two years
beginning July 1 and ending June 30: Provided, That the terms of office
of one-half the initial members and alternates shall end June 30, 2006;
and that beginning with the 2005-2006 fiscal period, no member shall
serve more than three consecutive two-year terms unless specifically
exempted by the Secretary. Members and alternate members shall serve in
such capacities for the portion of the term of office for which they
are selected and have qualified and until their respective successors
are selected and have qualified. The terms of office of successor
members and alternates shall be so determined that one-half of the
total committee membership ends each June 30.
23. Revise Sec. 927.28 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.28 Alternates for members.
The first alternate for a member shall act in the place and stead
of the member for whom he or she is an alternate during such member's
absence. In the event of the death, removal, resignation, or
disqualification of a member, his or her first alternate shall act as a
member until a successor for the member is selected and has qualified.
The second alternate for a member shall serve in the place and stead of
the member for whom he or she is an alternate whenever both the member
and his or her first alternate are unable to serve. In the event that a
member of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee and
both that member's alternates are unable to attend a meeting, the
member may designate any other alternate member from the same
[[Page 11161]]
group (handler, processor, or grower) to serve in that member's place
and stead.
24. Revise Sec. 927.29 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.29 Vacancies.
To fill any vacancy occasioned by the failure of any person
selected as a member or as an alternate for a member of the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear Committee to qualify, or in the event
of death, removal, resignation, or disqualification of any qualified
member or qualified alternate for a member, a successor for his or her
unexpired term shall be nominated and selected in the manner set forth
in Sec. Sec. 927.20 to 927.35. If nominations to fill any such vacancy
are not made within 20 days after such vacancy occurs, the Secretary
may fill such vacancy without regard to nominations.
25. Revise Sec. 927.30 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.30 Compensation and expenses.
The members and alternates for members shall serve without
compensation, but may be reimbursed for expenses necessarily incurred
by them in the performance of their respective duties.
26. Revise Sec. 927.31 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.31 Powers.
The Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee shall
have the following powers to exercise each independently:
(a) To administer, as specifically provided in Sec. Sec. 927.20 to
927.35, the terms and provisions of this subpart:
(b) To make administrative rules and regulations in accordance
with, and to effectuate, the terms and provisions of this subpart; and
(c) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints
of violations of the provisions of this subpart.
27. Revise Sec. 927.32 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.32 Duties.
The duties of the Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear
Committee, each independently, shall be as follows:
(a) To act as intermediary between the Secretary and any grower,
handler or processor;
(b) To keep minutes, books, and records which will reflect clearly
all of the acts and transactions. The minutes, books, and records shall
be subject at any time to examination by the Secretary or by such
person as may be designated by the Secretary;
(c) To investigate, from time to time, and to assemble data on the
growing, harvesting, shipping, and marketing conditions relative to
pears, and to furnish to the Secretary such available information as
may be requested;
(d) To perform such duties as may be assigned to it from time to
time by the Secretary in connection with the administration of section
32 of the Act to amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act, and for other
purposes, Public Act No. 320, 74th Congress, approved August 24, 1935
(49 Stat. 774), as amended;
(e) To cause the books to be audited by one or more competent
accountants at the end of each fiscal year and at such other times as
the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may deem
necessary or as the Secretary may request, and to file with the
Secretary copies of any and all audit reports made;
(f) To appoint such employees agents, and representatives as it may
deem necessary, and to determine the compensation and define the duties
of each;
(g) To give the Secretary, or the designated agent of the
Secretary, the same notice of meetings as is given to the members of
the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee;
(h) To select a chairman of the Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee and, from time to time, such other officers as
it may deem advisable and to define the duties of each; and
(i) To submit to the Secretary as soon as practicable after the
beginning of each fiscal period, a budget for such fiscal year,
including a report in explanation of the items appearing therein and a
recommendation as to the rate of assessment for such period.
28. Revise Sec. 927.33 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.33 Procedure.
(a) Quorum and voting. A quorum at a meeting of the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear Committee shall consist of 75 percent
of the number of committee members, or alternates then serving in the
place of any members, respectively. Except as otherwise provided in
Sec. 927.52, all decisions of the Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee at any meeting shall require the concurring
vote of at least 75 percent of those members present, including
alternates then serving in the place of any members.
(b) Mail voting. The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee may provide for members voting by mail, telecopier or other
electronic means, telephone, or telegraph, upon due notice to all
members. Promptly after voting by telephone or telegraph, each member
thus voting shall confirm in writing, the vote so cast.
29. Revise Sec. 927.34 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.34 Right of the Secretary.
The members and alternates for members and any agent or employee
appointed or employed by the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee shall be subject to removal or suspension by the Secretary at
any time. Each and every regulation, decision, determination, or other
act shall be subject to the continuing right of the Secretary to
disapprove of the same at any time, and, upon such disapproval, shall
be deemed null and void, except as to acts done in reliance thereon or
in compliance therewith prior to such disapproval by the Secretary.
30. Revise Sec. 927.35 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.35 Funds and other property.
(a) All funds received pursuant to any of the provisions of this
subpart shall be used solely for the purposes specified in this
subpart, and the Secretary may require the Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee and its members to account for all receipts
and disbursements.
(b) Upon the death, resignation, removal, disqualification, or
expiration of the term of office of any member or employee, all books,
records, funds, and other property in his or her possession belonging
to the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee shall be
delivered to his or her successor in office or to the Fresh Pear
Committee or Processed Pear Committee, and such assignments and other
instruments shall be executed as may be necessary to vest in such
successor or in the Fresh Pear Committee or Processed Pear Committee
full title to all the books, records, funds, and other property in the
possession or under the control of such member or employee pursuant to
this subpart.
31. Remove Sec. 927.36, Public advisors.
32. Revise Sec. 927.40 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.40 Expenses.
The Fresh Pear Committee and the Processed Pear Committee are
authorized, each independently, to incur such expenses as the Secretary
finds may be necessary to carry out their functions under this subpart.
The funds to cover such expenses shall be acquired by the levying of
assessments as provided in Sec. 927.41.
33. Revise Sec. 927.41 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.41 Assessments.
(a) Assessments will be levied only upon handlers who first handle
pears. Each handler shall pay assessments on all pears handled by such
handler as the pro rata share of the expenses which the Secretary finds
are reasonable and likely to be incurred by the Fresh Pear
[[Page 11162]]
Committee or the Processed Pear Committee during a fiscal period. The
payment of assessments for the maintenance and functioning of the Fresh
Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may be required under
this part throughout the period such assessments are payable
irrespective of whether particular provisions thereof are suspended or
become inoperative.
(b)(1) Based upon a recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee or
other available data, the Secretary shall fix three base rates of
assessment for pears that handlers shall pay on pears handled for the
fresh market during each fiscal period. Such base rates shall include
one rate of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of
pears classified as summer/fall; one rate of assessment for any or all
varieties or subvarieties of pears, classified as winter; and one rate
of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears
classified as other. Upon recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee or
other available data, the Secretary may also fix supplemental rates of
assessment on individual varieties or subvarieties categorized within
the above-defined assessment classifications to secure sufficient funds
to provide for projects authorized under Sec. 927.47. At any time
during the fiscal period when it is determined on the basis of a Fresh
Pear Committee recommendation or other information that different rates
are necessary for fresh pears or for any varieties or subvarieties, the
Secretary may modify those rates of assessment and such new rate shall
apply to any or all varieties or subvarieties that are shipped during
the fiscal period for fresh market.
(2) Based upon a recommendation of the Processed Pear Committee or
other available data, the Secretary shall fix three base rates of
assessment for pears that handlers shall pay on pears handled for
processing during each fiscal period. Such base rates shall include one
rate of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears
classified as summer/fall; one rate of assessment for any or all
varieties or subvarieties of pears, classified as winter; and one rate
of assessment for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears
classified as other. Upon recommendation of the Processed Pear
Committee or other available data, the Secretary may also fix
supplemental rates of assessment on individual varieties or
subvarieties categorized within the above-defined assessment
classifications to secure sufficient funds to provide for projects
authorized under Sec. 927.47. At any time during the fiscal period
when it is determined on the basis of a Processed Pear Committee
recommendation or other information that different rates are necessary
for pears for processing or for any varieties or subvarieties, the
Secretary may modify those rates of assessment and such new rate shall
apply to any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears that are shipped
during the fiscal period for processing.
(c) Based on the recommendation of the Fresh Pear Committee, the
Processed Pear Committee or other available data, the Secretary may
establish additional base rates of assessments, or change or modify the
base rate classifications defined in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
section.
(d) The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may
impose a late payment charge on any handler who fails to pay any
assessment within the time prescribed. In the event the handler
thereafter fails to pay the amount outstanding, including the late
payment charge, within the prescribed time, the Fresh Pear Committee or
the Processed Pear Committee may impose an additional charge in the
form of interest on such outstanding amount. The Fresh Pear Committee
or the Processed Pear Committee, with the approval of the Secretary,
shall prescribe the amount of such late payment charge and rate of
interest.
(e) In order to provide funds to carry out the functions of the
Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee prior to
commencement of shipments in any season, handlers may make advance
payments of assessments, which advance payments shall be credited to
such handlers and the assessments of such handlers shall be adjusted so
that such assessments are based upon the quantity of each variety or
subvariety of pears handled by such handlers during such season.
Further, payment discounts may be authorized by the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear Committee upon the approval of the
Secretary to handlers making such advance assessment payments.
34. Revise Sec. 927.42 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.42 Accounting.
(a) If, at the end of a fiscal period, the assessments collected
are in excess of expenses incurred, the Fresh Pear Committee or the
Processed Pear Committee may carryover such excess into subsequent
fiscal periods as a reserve: Provided, That funds already in the
reserve do not exceed approximately one fiscal period's expenses. Such
reserve may be used to cover any expense authorized under this part and
to cover necessary expenses of liquidation in the event of termination
of this part. Any such excess not retained in a reserve or applied to
any outstanding obligation of the person from whom it was collected
shall be refunded proportionately to the persons from whom it was
collected. Upon termination of this part, any funds not required to
defray the necessary expenses of liquidation shall be disposed of in
such manner as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate: Provided,
That to the extent practical, such funds shall be returned pro rata to
the persons from whom such funds were collected.
(b) All funds received pursuant to the provisions of this part
shall be used solely for the purpose specified in this part and shall
be accounted for in the manner provided in this part. The Secretary may
at any time require the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee and its members to account for all receipts and
disbursements.
35. Revise Sec. 927.43 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.43 Use of funds.
From the funds acquired pursuant to Sec. 927.41 the Fresh Pear
Committee and the Processed Pear Committee, each independently, shall
pay the salaries of its employees, if any, and pay the expenses
necessarily incurred in the performance of the duties of the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear Committee.
36. Remove Sec. 927.44, Collection of unpaid assessments.
37. Revise Sec. 927.45 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.45 Contributions.
The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee may accept
voluntary contributions but these shall only be used to pay expenses
incurred pursuant to Sec. 927.47. Furthermore, such contributions
shall be free from any encumbrances by the donor and the Fresh Pear
Committee or the Processed Pear Committee shall retain complete control
of their use.
38. Revise Sec. 927.47 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.47 Research and development.
The Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear Committee, with the
approval of the Secretary, may establish or provide for the
establishment of production and post-harvest research, or marketing
research and development projects designed to assist, improve, or
promote the marketing, distribution, and consumption of pears. Such
projects may provide for any form of marketing promotion, including
paid advertising. The expense of such projects shall be paid from funds
[[Page 11163]]
collected pursuant to Sec. Sec. 927.41 and 927.45. Expenditures for a
particular variety or subvariety of pears shall approximate the amount
of assessments and voluntary contributions collected for that variety
or subvariety of pears.
39. Revise Sec. 927.50 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.50 Marketing policy.
(a) It shall be the duty of the Fresh Pear Committee to
investigate, from time to time, supply and demand conditions relative
to pears and each grade, size, and quality of each variety or
subvariety thereof. Such investigations shall be with respect to the
following:
(1) Estimated production of each variety or subvariety of pears and
of each grade, size, and quality thereof;
(2) Prospective supplies and prices of pears and other fruits, both
in fresh and processed form, which are competitive to the marketing of
pears;
(3) Prospective exports of pears and imports of pears from other
producing areas;
(4) Probable harvesting period for each variety or subvariety of
pears;
(5) The trend and level of consumer income;
(6) General economic conditions; and
(7) Other relevant factors.
(b) On or before August 1 of each year, the Fresh Pear Committee
shall recommend regulations to the Secretary if it finds, on the basis
of the foregoing investigations, that such regulation as is provided in
Sec. 927.51 will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act.
(c) In the event the Fresh Pear Committee at any time finds that by
reason of changed conditions any regulation issued pursuant to Sec.
927.51 should be modified, suspended, or terminated, it shall so
recommend to the Secretary.
40. Revise Sec. 927.51 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.51 Issuance of regulations; and modification, suspension, or
termination thereof.
(a) Whenever the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and
information submitted by the Fresh Pear Committee, or from other
available information, that regulation, in the manner specified in this
section, of the shipment of fresh pears would tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the act, he or she shall so limit the shipment of
such pears during a specified period or periods. Such regulation may:
(1) Limit the total quantity of any grade, size, quality, or
combinations thereof, of any variety or subvariety of pears grown in
any district and may prescribe different requirements applicable to
shipments to different export markets;
(2) Limit, during any period or periods, the shipment of any
particular grade, size, quality, or any combination thereof, of any
variety or subvariety, of pears grown in any district or districts of
the production area; and
(3) Provide a method, through rules and regulation issued pursuant
to this part, for fixing markings on the container or containers, which
may be used in the packaging or handling of pears, including
appropriate logo or other container markings to identify the contents
thereof.
(b) Whenever the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and
information submitted by the Fresh Pear Committee, or from other
available information, that a regulation should be modified, suspended,
or terminated with respect to any or all shipments of fresh pears grown
in any district in order to effectuate the declared policy of the act,
he or she shall so modify, suspend, or terminate such regulation. If
the Secretary finds, from the recommendations and information submitted
by the Fresh Pear Committee, or from other available information, that
a regulation obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the act, he or she shall suspend or terminate such
regulation. On the same basis and in like manner, the Secretary may
terminate any such modification or suspension.
41. Revise Sec. 927.52 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.52 Prerequisites to recommendations.
(a) Decisions of the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed Pear
Committee with respect to any recommendations to the Secretary pursuant
to the establishment or modification of a supplemental rate of
assessment for an individual variety or subvariety of pears shall be
made by affirmative vote of not less than 75 percent of the applicable
total number of votes, computed in the manner hereinafter described in
this section, of all members. Decisions of the Fresh Pear Committee
pursuant to the provisions of Sec. 927.50 shall be made by an
affirmative vote of not less than 80 percent of the applicable total
number of votes, computed in the manner hereinafter prescribed in this
section, of all members.
(b) With respect to a particular variety or subvariety of pears,
the applicable total number of votes shall be the aggregate of the
votes allotted to the members in accordance with the following: Each
member shall have one vote as an individual and, in addition, shall
have a vote equal to the percentage of the vote of the district
represented by such member; and such district vote shall be computed as
soon as practical after the beginning of each fiscal period on either:
(1) The basis of one vote for each 25,000 boxes (except 2,500 boxes
for varieties or subvarieties with less than 200,000 standard boxes or
container equivalents) of the average quantity of such variety or
subvariety produced in the particular district and shipped therefrom
during the immediately preceding three fiscal periods; or
(2) Such other basis as the Fresh Pear Committee or the Processed
Pear Committee may recommend and the Secretary may approve. The votes
so allotted to a member may be cast by such member on each
recommendation relative to the variety or subvariety of pears on which
such votes were computed.
42. Revise Sec. 927.53 to read as follows:
Sec. 927.53 Notification.
(a) The Fresh Pear Committee shall give prompt notice to growers
and handlers of each recommendation to the Secretary pursuant to the
provisions of Sec. 927.50.
(b) The Secretary shall immediately notify the Fresh Pear Committee
of the issuance of each regulation and of each modification,
suspension, or termination of a regulation and the Fresh Pear Committee
shall give prompt notice thereof to growers and handlers.
42a. Remove Sec. 927.54, Exemption certificates.
43. Amend Sec. 927.60 by revising paragraph (a) and adding a new
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 927.60 Inspection and certification.
(a) Handlers shall ship only fresh pears inspected by the Federal-
State Inspection Service or under a program developed by the Federal-
State Inspection Service: except, that such inspection and
certification of shipments of pears may be performed by such other
inspection service as the Fresh Pear Committee, with the approval of
the Secretary, may designate. Promptly after shipment of any pears, the
handler shall submit, or cause to be submitted, to the Fresh Pear
Committee a copy of the inspection certificate issued on such shipment.
* * *