Interim Environmental Guidelines for Public Comment, 10690-10694 [05-4216]
Download as PDF
10690
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 42 / Friday, March 4, 2005 / Notices
WY20030002 (Jun. 13, 2003)
Volume VI
None
General Wage Determination Publication
General wage determinations issued under
the Davis-Bacon and related Acts, including
those noted above, may be found in the
Government Printing Office (GPO) document
entitled ‘‘General Wage Determinations
Issued Under The Davis-Bacon and Related
Acts’’. This publication is available at each
of the 50 Regional Government Depository
Libraries and many of the 1,400 Government
Depository Libraries across the country.
General wage determinations issued under
the Davis-Bacon and related Acts are
available electronically at no cost on the
Government Printing Office site at (https://
www.access.gpo.gov/davisbacon). They are
also available electronically by subscription
to the Davis-Bacon Online Service (https://
davisbacon.fedworld.gov) of the National
Technical Information Service (NTIS) of the
U.S. Department of Commerce at 1–800–363–
2068. This subscription offers value-added
features such as electronic delivery of
modified wage decisions directly to the
user’s desktop, the ability to access prior
wage decisions issued during the year,
extensive Help desk Support, etc.
Hard-copy subscriptions may be purchased
from:
Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
20402, (202) 512–1800.
When ordering hard-copy subscription(s),
be sure to specify the State(s) of interest,
since subscriptions may be ordered for any
or all of the six separate volumes, arranged
by State. Subscriptions include an annual
edition (issued in January or February) which
includes all current general wage
determinations for the States covered by each
volume. Throughout the remainder of the
year, regular weekly updates will be
distributed to subscribers.
Signed in Washington, DC this 24th day of
February, 2005.
John Frank,
Acting Chief, Branch of Construction Wage
Determinations.
[FR Doc. 05–3993 Filed 3–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–27–M
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE
CORPORATION
[MCC FR 05–03]
Notice of March 14, 2005 Millennium
Challenge Corporation Board of
Directors Meeting; Sunshine Act
Meeting
Millennium Challenge
Corporation.
TIME AND DATE: 1–3 p.m., Monday,
March 14, 2005.
PLACE: Department of State, C Street
Entrance, Washington, DC 20520.
AGENCY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:07 Mar 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Information on the meeting may be
obtained from Joyce B. Lanham at
Board@mcc.gov or 202–521–3600.
STATUS: Meeting will be closed to the
public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Board
of Directors (the ‘‘Board’’) of the
Millennium Challenge Corporation
(‘‘MCC’’) will hold a quarterly meeting
of the Board to discuss and consider a
proposed Millennium Challenge
Account (‘‘MCA’’) Compact under the
provisions of Section 605(a) of the
Millennium Challenge Act, codified at
22 U.S.C. 7706(a); other information
relating to Compact development efforts
with other MCA-eligible countries; the
MCC Threshold Program; and certain
administrative matters. The meeting
will be closed to the public because it
is expected to involve the consideration
of classified information and
information relating to the internal
personnel practices of MCC.
Dated: March 2, 2005.
Jon A. Dyck,
Vice President and General Counsel,
Millennium Challenge Corporation.
[FR Doc. 05–4324 Filed 3–2–05; 11:12 am]
BILLING CODE 9210–01–P
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE
CORPORATION
[MCC FR 05–02]
Interim Environmental Guidelines for
Public Comment
Millennium Challenge
Corporation.
SUMMARY: The purpose of these
Guidelines is to help ensure that the
projects undertaken as a part of the
Millennium Challenge Compacts are
environmentally sound, designed to
operate in compliance with relevant
regulatory requirements, and are not
likely to cause a significant
environmental health and safety hazard.
In order to provide guidance to MCC
eligible countries as they develop
Compacts, MCC will use these
procedures as interim Environmental
Guidelines throughout the comment
period.
Public Comment: For a ninety-day
period beginning on the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, the Millennium Challenge
Corporation will accept public comment
on the interim Environmental
Guidelines.
Contact Information: Public
comments should be submitted through
the MCC website at www.mcc.gov or in
writing addressed to: Public Comment
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on Environmental Guidelines,
Millennium Challenge Corporation, P.O.
Box 12825, Arlington, VA 22219–2825.
Environmental Guidelines
Table of Contents
Statement of Principles
Sources of Policy; Applicability of
Guidelines
Envrionmental Screening
Environmental Review
Public Consultation
Monitoring
Reporting
Appendix A: Definitions
Appendix B: Procedures Implementing
Executive Order 12114
Appendix C: Illustrative List of Sensitive
Sectors and Sensitive Locations
Appendix D: Environmental Impact
Assessment Reports
Statement of Principles
The Millennium Challenge
Corporation (‘‘MCC’’) recognizes that
the pursuit of sustainable economic
growth and a healthy environment are
necessarily related. The purpose of
these guidelines is to establish an
environmental review process to ensure
that the projects undertaken as part of
programs funded under Millennium
Challenge Compacts with eligible
countries (‘‘Compacts’’) are
environmentally sound, are designed to
operate in compliance with applicable
regulatory requirements, and, as
required by the legislation establishing
MCC, are not likely to cause a
significant environmental, health, or
safety hazard.1
MCC is committed to program design
that reflects the results of public
participation in host countries during
all phases of the program, integrating
governmental interests with those of
private business and civil society. In
this spirit, MCC will work to ensure that
the preparation of an environmental
impact assessment will include
consultation with affected parties.
Finally, MCC is committed to the
principle of host-country ownership of
a Compact proposal. Wherever
appropriate, MCC will consider
analyses, standards and norms of the
host country. In addition, Compact
projects should generally comply with
relevant international environmental
guidelines and requirements, including
those that the host country is bound by
under international agreements.
Sources of Policy; Applicability of
Guidelines
The policies reflected in these
guidelines are based, broadly speaking,
1 Appendix A sets forth definitions of words and
phrases used in these guidelines.
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 42 / Friday, March 4, 2005 / Notices
on sound sustainable development
project design principles and
international best practices in this field,
including, but not limited to, the
‘‘Principles of Environmental Impact
Assessment Best Practices’’ of the
International Association for Impact
Assessment, the environmental policies
and guidelines of other United States
government development assistance and
financing entities, the environmental
policies and guidelines of the
multilateral development banks, the
Common Approach developed by export
credit agencies through the Organization
for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD), and the Equator
Principles in use by international
commercial banks. In addition, these
guidelines reflect the following:
1. Section 605(e)(3) of the Millennium
Challenge Act of 2003 prohibits MCC
from providing assistance for any
project that is ‘‘likely to cause a
significant environmental, health, or
safety hazard.’’ Consequently, the
presence of such a project in a host
country’s proposal will preclude MCC
funding (or continued funding) of that
project. (See the discussion of
‘‘environmental, health or safety
hazard’’ in Appendix A.)
2. Executive Order 12114, January 4,
1979, 44 FR 1957 (January 9, 1979)
requires every federal agency taking
actions encompassed by that Executive
Order to establish procedures to
implement it with respect to certain
major Federal actions having significant
effects on the environment outside the
geographical borders of the United
States and its territories and
possessions. It is expected that the
Executive Order will have limited
applicability to MCC programs, but
where the terms of the Executive Order
apply, the procedures described in
Appendix B will be used.
3. In those instances where MCC’s
actions or a project undertaken or
funded under a Compact may
significantly affect the quality of the
environment of the United States,
including its territories or possessions,
MCC will require adherence to the
environmental review procedures
established by the Council on
Environmental Quality under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), in lieu of these guidelines.
MCC will review and revise these
guidelines from time to time to reflect
lessons learned in their application as
well as relevant changes in international
standards and norms of practice. In
addition, MCC may from time to time
provide such additional guidance to a
host country during the implementation
of a program as may be advisable in
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:07 Mar 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
light of host country norms and
international standards.
Environmental Screening
As early as possible in the Compact
proposal review process, MCC will
screen each project described in the
Compact (generally referred to herein as
a ‘‘project’’ or collectively, as
‘‘projects’’). MCC funding for a project is
contingent upon satisfactory completion
of environmental screening in
accordance with these guidelines, and
in general, the environmental screening
of projects will be completed before the
Compact is signed. For those projects
that require a full environmental impact
assessment, MCC funding for that
project generally will be contingent
upon completion of the EIA in
accordance with these guidelines.
• Categorical Prohibition: As stated
above, MCC may not provide assistance
for any project that is ‘‘likely to cause
a significant environmental, health, or
safety hazard.’’ Accordingly, as part of
its environmental screening, MCC will
identify and exclude such projects from
MCC financing, using the definition
contained in Appendix A. Such projects
will be classified as a Categorical
Prohibition.
• Determination of Project Category:
MCC will screen all Compact proposals
to identify projects that require further
review due to their potential adverse
environmental impacts,2 and projects
that are in sensitive sectors or in or near
sensitive locations. The result of this
screening process will be an
environmental classification following
the recommendations contained in the
OECD Common Approach and the
practices of the World Bank, classifying
in accordance with the potential
environmental impact, and the extent of
the environmental review required:
—Category A: A project is classified as
Category A if it has the potential to
have significant adverse
environmental impacts. These
impacts may affect an area broader
than the sites or facilities subject to
physical works. Category A, in
principle, includes projects in
sensitive sectors or located in or near
sensitive areas. An illustrative list of
sensitive sectors and sensitive
locations is set out in Appendix C.
—Category B: A project is classified as
Category B if its potential
environmental impacts are less
adverse than those of Category A
2 ‘‘Environmental impacts’’ include the effects of
a project on the surrounding natural environment
and on the humans reliant on that environment, to
include effects on cultural property, indigenous
peoples, and involuntary resettlement, as well as
the impacts on human health and safety.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10691
projects. Typically, these impacts are
site-specific, few if any of them are
irreversible, and mitigation measures
are more readily available.
—Category C: A project is classified as
Category C if it is likely to have
minimal or no adverse environmental
impacts.
Environmental Review
The application of these guidelines to
specific projects and the breadth, depth,
and type of environmental review to be
completed will depend on the nature,
scale, and potential environmental
impact of proposed projects.
Category A Projects
For Category A projects, MCC will
require an Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) as a condition for
disbursement of funds under a Compact.
An Environmental Impact Assessment
evaluates the potential environmental
risks and impacts of a specific project in
its area of influence; examines
alternatives to the project; identifies
ways of improving project selection,
siting, planning, design, and
implementation by preventing,
minimizing, mitigating, or
compensating for adverse
environmental impacts and enhancing
positive impacts; and includes the
process of mitigating and managing
adverse environmental impacts during
the implementation of a project. The
recommended contents of an
Environmental Impact Assessment
report are included in Appendix D.
An Environmental Impact Assessment
should be initiated as early as possible
in project development and be
integrated closely with the economic,
financial, institutional, social, and
technical analyses of a proposed project.
An Environmental Impact Assessment
should take into account the natural
environment (air, water, and land);
human health and safety; social aspects
(involuntary resettlement, indigenous
peoples and cultural property); and
transboundary and global
environmental aspects.
An Environmental Impact Assessment
should also take into account specific
host-country conditions; the findings of
host-country environmental studies;
National Environmental Action Plans
(NEAPs); the host country’s overall
policy framework and national
legislation; the capabilities of the entity
implementing the project, as they relate
to managing environmental and social
impacts; and obligations of the host
country under relevant international
environmental treaties and agreements.
While the completion of the
Environmental Impact Assessment is
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
10692
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 42 / Friday, March 4, 2005 / Notices
the responsibility, either directly or
indirectly, of the host country, MCC will
advise and consult on Environmental
Impact Assessment requirements. MCC
will review the findings and
recommendations of the Environmental
Impact Assessment to ensure their
consistency with these guidelines, and
where appropriate, may require
additional assessment work, including
public consultation and information
disclosure (see below).
Category B Projects
For environmental Category B
projects, the MCC will require specific
environmental analyses, as appropriate.
The scope and format of the analyses
will depend on the project and its
environmental impacts. Generally, the
scope of such work will be narrower
than for Category A projects.
Category C Projects
Environmental Category C projects are
unlikely to have adverse environmental
impacts. However, the MCC reserves the
right to require specific environmental
studies, reporting, or training where
relevant or where positive
environmental impacts may be
enhanced.
Public Consultation
Consistent with MCC’s principles of
host-country ownership of the projects
implemented under its Compact,
implementing entities will be expected
to allow meaningful public consultation
in the development of Compact-related
Environmental Impact Assessments and
make public the results of
Environmental Impact Assessments.
Monitoring
In order to ensure compliance with
measures to mitigate any adverse
environmental impacts of projects
undertaken pursuant to a Compact,
MCC may condition MCC funding for
the project on satisfactory
implementation of those mitigation
measures. The host country will be
responsible for appropriate monitoring
of project Environmental Impact
Assessments during the term of the
Compact. MCC will monitor compliance
through the review of information
provided by the implementing entity
and through site visits.
These guidelines will be referenced
and reflected in the Compact. The
Compact will include a prohibition, for
the full term of the Compact, on funding
projects deemed likely to cause a
significant environmental, health, or
safety hazard.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:07 Mar 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
Reporting
MCC will require regular reporting on
all projects for which an Environmental
Impact Assessment was completed and
as otherwise requested by MCC. The
reports should provide detailed
information on realized environmental
impacts and the status of the
implementation of the Environmental
Management Plan, including associated
costs. MCC may modify its guidance to
project implementers following the
review of such reports.
level of detail in an Environmental Impact
Assessment should be commensurate with a
project’s potential impact. At a minimum, an
Environmental Impact Assessment should
include the information outlined in
Appendix D: Environmental Impact
Assessment Reports (also sometimes referred
to as Environmental Impact Statements).
Environmental Management Plan (EMP)—
An Environmental Management Plan
describes mitigation, monitoring and
institutional measures to be taken during
project implementation to eliminate adverse
impacts, offset them, or reduce them to
acceptable levels.
Appendix A: Definitions
Environmental, Health or Safety Hazard—
A project is deemed ‘‘likely to cause a
significant environmental, health, or safety
hazard’’ and, therefore, prohibited from
receiving MCC funding, if:
(a) As a result of the project, even with
mitigation efforts and proper use, there exists
or will exist a substance, condition, or
circumstance that represents a significant
risk of harm to the environment or to human
health because of the physical, chemical or
biological effects of such substance,
condition or circumstance;
(b) The project involves or will involve the
production, procurement or intentional
release of:
—Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) that
the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (USEPA) has identified as of
greatest concern to the global community;3
—Any pesticide or industrial or consumer
chemical that is listed by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency as
‘‘banned’’ or ‘‘severely restricted’’ under
the Prior Informed Consent (PIC) Program;4
or
—A product (including an emission or
effluent) that is prohibited or strictly
regulated in the United States because its
toxic effects on the environment create a
serious public health risk; or
(c) The project is a physical project that is
prohibited or strictly regulated by Federal
law in the United States to protect the
environment from radioactive substances,
unless the MCC has made a final
determination, taking into account a
thorough Environmental Impact Assessment,
that the project is not likely to cause a
significant environmental, health, or safety
hazard.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)—
Analysis that identifies the potential
environmental risks and impacts of a specific
project in its area of influence; examines
alternatives to the project; identifies ways of
improving project selection, siting, planning,
design, and implementation by preventing,
minimizing, mitigating, or compensating for
adverse environmental impacts and
enhancing positive impacts; and includes the
process of mitigating and managing adverse
environmental impacts during the
implementation of a project. The scope and
Appendix B: Procedures Implementing
Executive Order 12114
This Appendix sets forth the procedures
that MCC will use to implement Executive
Order 12114, January 4, 1979, 44 FR 1957
(January 9, 1979) (the ‘‘Executive Order’’).
3 https://www.epa.gov/oppfeadl/international/
pops.htm.
4 https://www.epa.gov/oppfeadl/international/
piclist.htm.
5 Source. EBRD Environmental Policy (https://
www.ebrd.org/enviro/index.htm, also in use under
the Organization for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) ‘‘Common Approach.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. Actions Covered
The MCC officer having the ultimate
responsibility for authorizing and approving
actions will take into consideration an
appropriate environmental review before
authorizing and approving any
a. Major Federal action that significantly
affects the environment of the global
commons outside the jurisdiction of any
nation (e.g., the oceans);
b. Major Federal action that significantly
affects the environment of a foreign nation
not involved or participating with the United
States in the action; or
c. Major Federal action outside the United
States that significantly affects natural or
ecological resources of worldwide
importance which the President has
designated for protection or, in the case of
resources protected under a binding
international agreement, by the Secretary of
State.
2. Type of Environmental Review
a. For actions specified in 1.a above, MCC
will consider an Environmental Impact
Assessment.
b. For actions specified in 1.b or 1.c above,
MCC will take into consideration an
appropriate environmental review in
accordance with the criteria in the
‘‘Environmental Review’’ section of these
guidelines.
3. State Department Coordination
MCC will contact the State Department for
coordination of all communications with
foreign governments concerning
environmental agreements and other
arrangements to implement sections 1 and 2
above.
Appendix C: Illustrative List of Sensitive
Sectors and Sensitive Locations 5
The following list is indicative and the
types of projects it contains are examples
only. This list is not intended to be
exhaustive.
—Crude oil refineries (excluding
undertakings manufacturing only
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 42 / Friday, March 4, 2005 / Notices
lubricants from crude oil) and installations
for the gasification and liquefaction of 500
tons or more of coal or bituminous shale
per day.
—Thermal power stations and other
combustion installations with a heat
output of 300 megawatts or more and
nuclear power stations and other nuclear
reactors, including the dismantling or
decommissioning of such power stations or
reactors (except research installations for
the production and conversion of
fissionable and fertile materials, whose
maximum power does not exceed 1
kilowatt continuous thermal load).
—Installations designed for the production,
or enrichment of nuclear fuels, the
reprocessing, storage or final disposal of
irradiated nuclear fuels, or for the storage,
disposal or processing of radioactive waste.
—Integrated works for the initial smelting of
cast-iron and steel; installations for the
production of nonferrous crude metals
from ore, concentrates or secondary raw
materials by metallurgical, chemical or
electrolytic processes.
—Installations for the extraction of asbestos
and for the processing and transformation
of asbestos and products containing
asbestos: for asbestos-cement products,
with an annual production of more than
20,000 tons finished product; for friction
material, with an annual production of
more than 50 tons finished product; and
for other asbestos utilization of more than
200 tons per year.
—Integrated chemical installations, i.e., those
installations for the manufacture on an
industrial scale of substances using
chemical conversion processes, in which
several units are juxtaposed and are
functionally linked to one another and
which are for the production of: basic
organic chemicals; basic inorganic
chemicals; phosphorous-, nitrogen- or
potassium-based fertilizers (simple or
compound fertilizers); basic plant health
products and biocides; basic
pharmaceutical products using a chemical
or biological process; explosives.
—Construction of motorways, express roads
and lines for long-distance railway traffic
and of airports with a basic runway length
of 2,100 meters or more; construction of a
new road of four or more lanes, or
realignment and/or widening of an existing
road so as to provide four or more lanes,
where such new road, or realigned and/or
widened section of road would be 10 km
or more in a continuous length.
—Pipelines, terminals, and associated
facilities for the large-scale transport of gas,
oil, and chemicals.
—Sea ports and also inland waterways and
ports for inland-waterway traffic which
permit the passage of vessels of over 1,350
tons; trading ports, piers for loading and
unloading connected to land and outside
ports (excluding ferry piers) which can
take vessels of over 1,350 tons.
—Waste-processing and disposal
installations for the incineration, chemical
treatment or landfill of hazardous, toxic or
dangerous wastes.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:07 Mar 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
—Large 6 dams and other impoundments
designed for the holding back or
permanent storage of water.
—Groundwater abstraction projects or
artificial groundwater recharge schemes in
cases where the annual volume of water to
be abstracted or recharged amounts to 10
million cubic meters or more.
—Industrial plants for the (a) production of
pulp from timber or similar fibrous
materials; (b) production of paper and
board with a production capacity
exceeding 200 air-dried metric tons per
day.
—Peat extraction, quarries and open-cast
mining, and processing of metal ores or
coal.
—Extraction of petroleum and natural gas for
commercial purposes.
—Installations for storage of petroleum,
petrochemical, or chemical products with
a capacity of 200,000 tons or more.
—Large-scale logging.
—Municipal wastewater treatment plants
with a capacity exceeding 150,000
population equivalent.
—Municipal solid waste-processing and
disposal facilities.
—Large-scale tourism and retail
development.
—Construction of overhead electrical power
lines.
—Large-scale land reclamation.
—Large-scale primary agriculture/silviculture
involving intensification or conversion of
natural habitats.
—Plants for the tanning of hides and skins
where the treatment capacity exceeds 12
tons of finished products per day.
—Installations for the intensive rearing of
poultry or pigs with more than: 40,000
places for poultry; 2,000 places for
production pigs (over 30 kg); or 750 places
for sows.
—Projects that are planned to be carried out
in sensitive locations or are likely to have
a perceptible impact on such locations,
even if the project category does not appear
in the above list. Such sensitive locations
include National Parks and other protected
areas identified by national or international
law, and other sensitive locations of
international, national or regional
importance, such as wetlands, forests with
high biodiversity value, areas of
archaeological or cultural significance, and
areas of importance for indigenous peoples
or other vulnerable groups.
Appendix D: Environmental Impact
Assessment Reports 7
The scope and level of detail of an
Environmental Impact Assessment should be
commensurate with the potential impacts of
the project. The Environmental Impact
Assessment report should include the
6 A large dam is a dam with a height of 15 meters
or more from the foundation or a dam that is
between five and 15 meters high with a reservoir
volume of more than three million cubic meters (the
definition used by the International Commission on
Large Dams (ICOLD)).
7 This Appendix is based on the World Bank
Operational Manual, OP 4.01, which is also in use
under the Organization for Economic Co-operation
and Development (OECD) ‘‘Common Approach.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10693
following items (not necessarily in the order
shown):
• Executive summary: concisely discusses
significant findings and recommended
actions.
• Policy, legal and administrative
framework: discusses the policy, legal, and
administrative framework within which the
Environmental Impact Assessment is carried
out.
• Project description: describes the
proposed project and its geographic,
ecological, social, and temporal context,
including any offsite investments that may be
required (e.g., dedicated pipelines, access
roads, power plants, water supply, housing,
and raw material and product storage
facilities). Indicates the need for any
resettlement or social development plan.
Normally includes a map showing the project
site and the project’s area of influence.
• Baseline data: assesses the dimensions of
the study area and describes relevant
physical, biological, and socio-economic
conditions, including any changes
anticipated before the project commences.
Also, it takes into account current and
proposed development projects within the
project area but not directly connected to the
project. Data should be relevant to decisions
about project location, design, operation, or
mitigatory measures; the section indicates
accuracy, reliability and sources of the data.
• Environmental Impacts: predicts and
assesses the project’s likely positive and
negative impacts, including the impact on
involuntary resettlement, indigenous peoples
and cultural property, in quantitative terms
to the extent possible. It identifies mitigation
measures and any residual negative impacts
that cannot be mitigated. It explores
opportunities for environmental
enhancement. Identifies and estimates the
extent and quality of available data, key data
gaps, and uncertainties associated with
predictions, and specifies topics that do not
require further attention.
• Analysis of alternatives: systematically
compares feasible alternatives to the
proposed project site, technology, design and
operation-including the ‘‘without project’’
situation-in terms of their potential
environmental impacts; the feasibility of
mitigating these impacts; their capital and
recurrent costs; their suitability under local
conditions; and their institutional, training
and monitoring requirements. For each of the
alternatives, it quantifies the environmental
impacts to the extent possible, and attaches
economic values where feasible. It states the
basis for selecting the particular project
design proposed and justifies recommended
emission levels and approaches to pollution
prevention and abatement.
• Environmental Management Plan:
describes mitigation, monitoring and
institutional measures to be taken during
project implementation to eliminate adverse
impacts, offset them, or reduce them to
acceptable levels.
• Consultation: lists and describes
consultation meetings, including
consultations for obtaining the informed
views of the affected people, local
nongovernmental organizations and
regulatory agencies.
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
10694
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 42 / Friday, March 4, 2005 / Notices
Dated: February 28, 2005.
Frances C. McNaught,
Vice President, Domestic Relations,
Millennium Challenge Corporation.
[FR Doc. 05–4216 Filed 3–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9210–01–U
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Alan T. Waterman Award Committee;
Notice of Meeting
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Alan T. Waterman Award
Committee, #1172.
Date and Time: Tuesday, March 8, 2005,
8:30 a.m.–12:30 p.m., room 1235.
Place: Arlington, Virginia.
Type of Meeting: Closed.
Contact Person: Mrs. Susan E. Fannoney,
Executive Secretary, Room 1220, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd.,
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292–
8096.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and
recommendations in the selection of the Alan
T. Waterman Award recipient.
Agenda: To review and evaluate
nominations as part of the selection process
for awards.
Reason for Late Notice: To administrative
oversight.
Reason for Closing: The nominations being
reviewed include information of a personal
nature where disclosure would constitute
unwarranted invasions of personal privacy.
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(6) of the Government in the Sunshine
Act.
Contact Person: Dr. Kaye Shedlock,
EarthScope Program Officer, Division of
Earth Sciences, Room 785, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington,
VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292–8559.
Minutes: May be obtained from the contact
person listed above.
Purpose of Meeting: To carry out
EarthScope proposal and management
review, and to provide advice,
recommendations, and oversight concerning
EarthScope construction, operation, science
and education support.
Agenda: Open March 31, 2004 1 p.m.–5
p.m.—To review program and facility
management, installation technical plans,
science plans, and progress reports of
EarthScope.
Open April 1, 2004 8:30 a.m.–10 a.m.—To
review program and facility management,
installation technical plans, science plans,
and progress reports of EarthScope.
Closed: April 1, 2005, 10 a.m.–12 p.m.—To
review the EarthScope Operation and
Maintenance Plan covering funding for
personnel and subcontracts for the operation
phase of EarthScope; proposal actions from
the 2005 EarthScope Solicitation, including
the discussion of proposals still under
review.
Reason for Closing: The projects being
reviewed include information of a
proprietary or confidential nature, including
technical information; financial data and
personal information concerning individuals
associated with the proposals. These matters
are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.
Dated: March 1, 2005.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–4267 Filed 3–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
Dated: March 1, 2005.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–4266 Filed 3–3–05; 8:45 am]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
FirstEnergy Corporation and
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company; Notice of Receipt and
Availability of Application for Renewal
of Beaver Valley Power Station, Units
1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos.
DPR–66 and NPF–73 for an Additional
20-year Period
[Docket Nos. 50–334 and 50–412]
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
The EarthScope Science and
Education Advisory Committee
(16638); Notice of Meeting
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: The EarthScope Science and
Education Advisory Committee (ESEC)
meeting.
Dates and Time: 1 p.m.–5 p.m. Thursday,
March 31, 2005. 8:30 a.m.–12 p.m. Friday,
April 1, 2005.
Place: Hyatt Hotel/Tamaya Resort, 1300
Tuyuna Trail, Santa Ana Pueblo, NM 87004.
Type of Meeting: Part open (see agenda
below).
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:07 Mar 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or Commission) has
received an application, dated February
9, 2005, from FirstEnergy Corporation
and FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company, filed pursuant to sections
104b (DPR–66) and 103 (NPF–73) of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
and 10 CFR part 54, to renew the
operating licenses for the Beaver Valley
Power Station, Units 1 and 2,
respectively. Renewal of the licenses
would authorize the applicant to
operate each facility for an additional
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20-year period beyond the period
specified in the respective current
operating licenses. The current
operating license for Beaver Valley
Power Station, Unit 1 (DPR–66) expires
on January 29, 2016. The current
operating license for Beaver Valley
Power Station, Unit 2 (NPF–73) expires
on May 27, 2027. Beaver Valley Power
Station, Units 1 and 2 are pressurized
water reactors designed by
Westinghouse. Both units are located
near Shippingport, PA. The
acceptability of the tendered application
for docketing, and other matters,
including an opportunity to request a
hearing, will be the subject of
subsequent Federal Register notices.
Copies of the application are available
for public inspection at the
Commission’s Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland 20582 or
electronically from the NRC’s
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room under
accession number ML050540047. The
ADAMS Public Electronic Reading
Room is accessible from the NRC Web
site at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. In addition, the application
is available at https://www.nrc.gov/
reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/
applications.html, on the NRC Web
page, while the application is under
review. Persons who do not have access
to ADAMS or who encounter problems
in accessing the documents located in
ADAMS should contact the NRC’s PDR
Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209,
extension (301) 415–4737, or by e-mail
to pdr@nrc.gov.
A copy of the license renewal
application for the Beaver Valley Power
Station, Units 1 and 2, is also available
to local residents near the Beaver Valley
Power Station, Units 1 and 2, at the B.
F. Jones Memorial Library, 663 Franklin
Ave., Aliquippa, PA 15001.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23 day
of February 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Pao-Tsin Kuo, Program Director,
License Renewal and Environmental Impacts,
Division of Regulatory Improvement
Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 05–4174 Filed 3–3–05 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 42 (Friday, March 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10690-10694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4216]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION
[MCC FR 05-02]
Interim Environmental Guidelines for Public Comment
AGENCY: Millennium Challenge Corporation.
SUMMARY: The purpose of these Guidelines is to help ensure that the
projects undertaken as a part of the Millennium Challenge Compacts are
environmentally sound, designed to operate in compliance with relevant
regulatory requirements, and are not likely to cause a significant
environmental health and safety hazard. In order to provide guidance to
MCC eligible countries as they develop Compacts, MCC will use these
procedures as interim Environmental Guidelines throughout the comment
period.
Public Comment: For a ninety-day period beginning on the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register, the Millennium
Challenge Corporation will accept public comment on the interim
Environmental Guidelines.
Contact Information: Public comments should be submitted through
the MCC website at www.mcc.gov or in writing addressed to: Public
Comment on Environmental Guidelines, Millennium Challenge Corporation,
P.O. Box 12825, Arlington, VA 22219-2825.
Environmental Guidelines
Table of Contents
Statement of Principles
Sources of Policy; Applicability of Guidelines
Envrionmental Screening
Environmental Review
Public Consultation
Monitoring
Reporting
Appendix A: Definitions
Appendix B: Procedures Implementing Executive Order 12114
Appendix C: Illustrative List of Sensitive Sectors and Sensitive
Locations
Appendix D: Environmental Impact Assessment Reports
Statement of Principles
The Millennium Challenge Corporation (``MCC'') recognizes that the
pursuit of sustainable economic growth and a healthy environment are
necessarily related. The purpose of these guidelines is to establish an
environmental review process to ensure that the projects undertaken as
part of programs funded under Millennium Challenge Compacts with
eligible countries (``Compacts'') are environmentally sound, are
designed to operate in compliance with applicable regulatory
requirements, and, as required by the legislation establishing MCC, are
not likely to cause a significant environmental, health, or safety
hazard.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Appendix A sets forth definitions of words and phrases used
in these guidelines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCC is committed to program design that reflects the results of
public participation in host countries during all phases of the
program, integrating governmental interests with those of private
business and civil society. In this spirit, MCC will work to ensure
that the preparation of an environmental impact assessment will include
consultation with affected parties.
Finally, MCC is committed to the principle of host-country
ownership of a Compact proposal. Wherever appropriate, MCC will
consider analyses, standards and norms of the host country. In
addition, Compact projects should generally comply with relevant
international environmental guidelines and requirements, including
those that the host country is bound by under international agreements.
Sources of Policy; Applicability of Guidelines
The policies reflected in these guidelines are based, broadly
speaking,
[[Page 10691]]
on sound sustainable development project design principles and
international best practices in this field, including, but not limited
to, the ``Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best
Practices'' of the International Association for Impact Assessment, the
environmental policies and guidelines of other United States government
development assistance and financing entities, the environmental
policies and guidelines of the multilateral development banks, the
Common Approach developed by export credit agencies through the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and the
Equator Principles in use by international commercial banks. In
addition, these guidelines reflect the following:
1. Section 605(e)(3) of the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003
prohibits MCC from providing assistance for any project that is
``likely to cause a significant environmental, health, or safety
hazard.'' Consequently, the presence of such a project in a host
country's proposal will preclude MCC funding (or continued funding) of
that project. (See the discussion of ``environmental, health or safety
hazard'' in Appendix A.)
2. Executive Order 12114, January 4, 1979, 44 FR 1957 (January 9,
1979) requires every federal agency taking actions encompassed by that
Executive Order to establish procedures to implement it with respect to
certain major Federal actions having significant effects on the
environment outside the geographical borders of the United States and
its territories and possessions. It is expected that the Executive
Order will have limited applicability to MCC programs, but where the
terms of the Executive Order apply, the procedures described in
Appendix B will be used.
3. In those instances where MCC's actions or a project undertaken
or funded under a Compact may significantly affect the quality of the
environment of the United States, including its territories or
possessions, MCC will require adherence to the environmental review
procedures established by the Council on Environmental Quality under
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), in lieu of these
guidelines.
MCC will review and revise these guidelines from time to time to
reflect lessons learned in their application as well as relevant
changes in international standards and norms of practice. In addition,
MCC may from time to time provide such additional guidance to a host
country during the implementation of a program as may be advisable in
light of host country norms and international standards.
Environmental Screening
As early as possible in the Compact proposal review process, MCC
will screen each project described in the Compact (generally referred
to herein as a ``project'' or collectively, as ``projects''). MCC
funding for a project is contingent upon satisfactory completion of
environmental screening in accordance with these guidelines, and in
general, the environmental screening of projects will be completed
before the Compact is signed. For those projects that require a full
environmental impact assessment, MCC funding for that project generally
will be contingent upon completion of the EIA in accordance with these
guidelines.
Categorical Prohibition: As stated above, MCC may not
provide assistance for any project that is ``likely to cause a
significant environmental, health, or safety hazard.'' Accordingly, as
part of its environmental screening, MCC will identify and exclude such
projects from MCC financing, using the definition contained in Appendix
A. Such projects will be classified as a Categorical Prohibition.
Determination of Project Category: MCC will screen all
Compact proposals to identify projects that require further review due
to their potential adverse environmental impacts,\2\ and projects that
are in sensitive sectors or in or near sensitive locations. The result
of this screening process will be an environmental classification
following the recommendations contained in the OECD Common Approach and
the practices of the World Bank, classifying in accordance with the
potential environmental impact, and the extent of the environmental
review required:
\2\ ``Environmental impacts'' include the effects of a project
on the surrounding natural environment and on the humans reliant on
that environment, to include effects on cultural property,
indigenous peoples, and involuntary resettlement, as well as the
impacts on human health and safety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--Category A: A project is classified as Category A if it has the
potential to have significant adverse environmental impacts. These
impacts may affect an area broader than the sites or facilities subject
to physical works. Category A, in principle, includes projects in
sensitive sectors or located in or near sensitive areas. An
illustrative list of sensitive sectors and sensitive locations is set
out in Appendix C.
--Category B: A project is classified as Category B if its potential
environmental impacts are less adverse than those of Category A
projects. Typically, these impacts are site-specific, few if any of
them are irreversible, and mitigation measures are more readily
available.
--Category C: A project is classified as Category C if it is likely to
have minimal or no adverse environmental impacts.
Environmental Review
The application of these guidelines to specific projects and the
breadth, depth, and type of environmental review to be completed will
depend on the nature, scale, and potential environmental impact of
proposed projects.
Category A Projects
For Category A projects, MCC will require an Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) as a condition for disbursement of funds under a
Compact. An Environmental Impact Assessment evaluates the potential
environmental risks and impacts of a specific project in its area of
influence; examines alternatives to the project; identifies ways of
improving project selection, siting, planning, design, and
implementation by preventing, minimizing, mitigating, or compensating
for adverse environmental impacts and enhancing positive impacts; and
includes the process of mitigating and managing adverse environmental
impacts during the implementation of a project. The recommended
contents of an Environmental Impact Assessment report are included in
Appendix D.
An Environmental Impact Assessment should be initiated as early as
possible in project development and be integrated closely with the
economic, financial, institutional, social, and technical analyses of a
proposed project.
An Environmental Impact Assessment should take into account the
natural environment (air, water, and land); human health and safety;
social aspects (involuntary resettlement, indigenous peoples and
cultural property); and transboundary and global environmental aspects.
An Environmental Impact Assessment should also take into account
specific host-country conditions; the findings of host-country
environmental studies; National Environmental Action Plans (NEAPs); the
host country's overall policy framework and national legislation; the
capabilities of the entity implementing the project, as they relate to
managing environmental and social impacts; and obligations of the host
country under relevant international environmental treaties and
agreements.
While the completion of the Environmental Impact Assessment is
[[Page 10692]]
the responsibility, either directly or indirectly, of the host country,
MCC will advise and consult on Environmental Impact Assessment
requirements. MCC will review the findings and recommendations of the
Environmental Impact Assessment to ensure their consistency with these
guidelines, and where appropriate, may require additional assessment
work, including public consultation and information disclosure (see
below).
Category B Projects
For environmental Category B projects, the MCC will require
specific environmental analyses, as appropriate. The scope and format
of the analyses will depend on the project and its environmental
impacts. Generally, the scope of such work will be narrower than for
Category A projects.
Category C Projects
Environmental Category C projects are unlikely to have adverse
environmental impacts. However, the MCC reserves the right to require
specific environmental studies, reporting, or training where relevant
or where positive environmental impacts may be enhanced.
Public Consultation
Consistent with MCC's principles of host-country ownership of the
projects implemented under its Compact, implementing entities will be
expected to allow meaningful public consultation in the development of
Compact-related Environmental Impact Assessments and make public the
results of Environmental Impact Assessments.
Monitoring
In order to ensure compliance with measures to mitigate any adverse
environmental impacts of projects undertaken pursuant to a Compact, MCC
may condition MCC funding for the project on satisfactory
implementation of those mitigation measures. The host country will be
responsible for appropriate monitoring of project Environmental Impact
Assessments during the term of the Compact. MCC will monitor compliance
through the review of information provided by the implementing entity
and through site visits.
These guidelines will be referenced and reflected in the Compact.
The Compact will include a prohibition, for the full term of the
Compact, on funding projects deemed likely to cause a significant
environmental, health, or safety hazard.
Reporting
MCC will require regular reporting on all projects for which an
Environmental Impact Assessment was completed and as otherwise
requested by MCC. The reports should provide detailed information on
realized environmental impacts and the status of the implementation of
the Environmental Management Plan, including associated costs. MCC may
modify its guidance to project implementers following the review of
such reports.
Appendix A: Definitions
Environmental, Health or Safety Hazard--A project is deemed
``likely to cause a significant environmental, health, or safety
hazard'' and, therefore, prohibited from receiving MCC funding, if:
(a) As a result of the project, even with mitigation efforts and
proper use, there exists or will exist a substance, condition, or
circumstance that represents a significant risk of harm to the
environment or to human health because of the physical, chemical or
biological effects of such substance, condition or circumstance;
(b) The project involves or will involve the production,
procurement or intentional release of:
--Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) that the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has identified as of
greatest concern to the global community;\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ https://www.epa.gov/oppfeadl/international/pops.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--Any pesticide or industrial or consumer chemical that is listed by
the United States Environmental Protection Agency as ``banned'' or
``severely restricted'' under the Prior Informed Consent (PIC)
Program;\4\ or
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ https://www.epa.gov/oppfeadl/international/piclist.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--A product (including an emission or effluent) that is prohibited
or strictly regulated in the United States because its toxic effects
on the environment create a serious public health risk; or
(c) The project is a physical project that is prohibited or
strictly regulated by Federal law in the United States to protect
the environment from radioactive substances, unless the MCC has made
a final determination, taking into account a thorough Environmental
Impact Assessment, that the project is not likely to cause a
significant environmental, health, or safety hazard.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)--Analysis that identifies
the potential environmental risks and impacts of a specific project
in its area of influence; examines alternatives to the project;
identifies ways of improving project selection, siting, planning,
design, and implementation by preventing, minimizing, mitigating, or
compensating for adverse environmental impacts and enhancing
positive impacts; and includes the process of mitigating and
managing adverse environmental impacts during the implementation of
a project. The scope and level of detail in an Environmental Impact
Assessment should be commensurate with a project's potential impact.
At a minimum, an Environmental Impact Assessment should include the
information outlined in Appendix D: Environmental Impact Assessment
Reports (also sometimes referred to as Environmental Impact
Statements).
Environmental Management Plan (EMP)--An Environmental Management
Plan describes mitigation, monitoring and institutional measures to
be taken during project implementation to eliminate adverse impacts,
offset them, or reduce them to acceptable levels.
Appendix B: Procedures Implementing Executive Order 12114
This Appendix sets forth the procedures that MCC will use to
implement Executive Order 12114, January 4, 1979, 44 FR 1957
(January 9, 1979) (the ``Executive Order'').
1. Actions Covered
The MCC officer having the ultimate responsibility for
authorizing and approving actions will take into consideration an
appropriate environmental review before authorizing and approving
any
a. Major Federal action that significantly affects the
environment of the global commons outside the jurisdiction of any
nation (e.g., the oceans);
b. Major Federal action that significantly affects the
environment of a foreign nation not involved or participating with
the United States in the action; or
c. Major Federal action outside the United States that
significantly affects natural or ecological resources of worldwide
importance which the President has designated for protection or, in
the case of resources protected under a binding international
agreement, by the Secretary of State.
2. Type of Environmental Review
a. For actions specified in 1.a above, MCC will consider an
Environmental Impact Assessment.
b. For actions specified in 1.b or 1.c above, MCC will take into
consideration an appropriate environmental review in accordance with
the criteria in the ``Environmental Review'' section of these
guidelines.
3. State Department Coordination
MCC will contact the State Department for coordination of all
communications with foreign governments concerning environmental
agreements and other arrangements to implement sections 1 and 2
above.
Appendix C: Illustrative List of Sensitive Sectors and Sensitive
Locations \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Source. EBRD Environmental Policy (https://www.ebrd.org/
enviro/index.htm, also in use under the Organization for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD) ``Common Approach.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following list is indicative and the types of projects it
contains are examples only. This list is not intended to be
exhaustive.
--Crude oil refineries (excluding undertakings manufacturing only
[[Page 10693]]
lubricants from crude oil) and installations for the gasification
and liquefaction of 500 tons or more of coal or bituminous shale per
day.
--Thermal power stations and other combustion installations with a
heat output of 300 megawatts or more and nuclear power stations and
other nuclear reactors, including the dismantling or decommissioning
of such power stations or reactors (except research installations
for the production and conversion of fissionable and fertile
materials, whose maximum power does not exceed 1 kilowatt continuous
thermal load).
--Installations designed for the production, or enrichment of
nuclear fuels, the reprocessing, storage or final disposal of
irradiated nuclear fuels, or for the storage, disposal or processing
of radioactive waste.
--Integrated works for the initial smelting of cast-iron and steel;
installations for the production of nonferrous crude metals from
ore, concentrates or secondary raw materials by metallurgical,
chemical or electrolytic processes.
--Installations for the extraction of asbestos and for the
processing and transformation of asbestos and products containing
asbestos: for asbestos-cement products, with an annual production of
more than 20,000 tons finished product; for friction material, with
an annual production of more than 50 tons finished product; and for
other asbestos utilization of more than 200 tons per year.
--Integrated chemical installations, i.e., those installations for
the manufacture on an industrial scale of substances using chemical
conversion processes, in which several units are juxtaposed and are
functionally linked to one another and which are for the production
of: basic organic chemicals; basic inorganic chemicals; phosphorous-
, nitrogen- or potassium-based fertilizers (simple or compound
fertilizers); basic plant health products and biocides; basic
pharmaceutical products using a chemical or biological process;
explosives.
--Construction of motorways, express roads and lines for long-
distance railway traffic and of airports with a basic runway length
of 2,100 meters or more; construction of a new road of four or more
lanes, or realignment and/or widening of an existing road so as to
provide four or more lanes, where such new road, or realigned and/or
widened section of road would be 10 km or more in a continuous
length.
--Pipelines, terminals, and associated facilities for the large-
scale transport of gas, oil, and chemicals.
--Sea ports and also inland waterways and ports for inland-waterway
traffic which permit the passage of vessels of over 1,350 tons;
trading ports, piers for loading and unloading connected to land and
outside ports (excluding ferry piers) which can take vessels of over
1,350 tons.
--Waste-processing and disposal installations for the incineration,
chemical treatment or landfill of hazardous, toxic or dangerous
wastes.
--Large \6\ dams and other impoundments designed for the holding
back or permanent storage of water.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ A large dam is a dam with a height of 15 meters or more from
the foundation or a dam that is between five and 15 meters high with
a reservoir volume of more than three million cubic meters (the
definition used by the International Commission on Large Dams
(ICOLD)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--Groundwater abstraction projects or artificial groundwater
recharge schemes in cases where the annual volume of water to be
abstracted or recharged amounts to 10 million cubic meters or more.
--Industrial plants for the (a) production of pulp from timber or
similar fibrous materials; (b) production of paper and board with a
production capacity exceeding 200 air-dried metric tons per day.
--Peat extraction, quarries and open-cast mining, and processing of
metal ores or coal.
--Extraction of petroleum and natural gas for commercial purposes.
--Installations for storage of petroleum, petrochemical, or chemical
products with a capacity of 200,000 tons or more.
--Large-scale logging.
--Municipal wastewater treatment plants with a capacity exceeding
150,000 population equivalent.
--Municipal solid waste-processing and disposal facilities.
--Large-scale tourism and retail development.
--Construction of overhead electrical power lines.
--Large-scale land reclamation.
--Large-scale primary agriculture/silviculture involving
intensification or conversion of natural habitats.
--Plants for the tanning of hides and skins where the treatment
capacity exceeds 12 tons of finished products per day.
--Installations for the intensive rearing of poultry or pigs with
more than: 40,000 places for poultry; 2,000 places for production
pigs (over 30 kg); or 750 places for sows.
--Projects that are planned to be carried out in sensitive locations
or are likely to have a perceptible impact on such locations, even
if the project category does not appear in the above list. Such
sensitive locations include National Parks and other protected areas
identified by national or international law, and other sensitive
locations of international, national or regional importance, such as
wetlands, forests with high biodiversity value, areas of
archaeological or cultural significance, and areas of importance for
indigenous peoples or other vulnerable groups.
Appendix D: Environmental Impact Assessment Reports \7\
The scope and level of detail of an Environmental Impact
Assessment should be commensurate with the potential impacts of the
project. The Environmental Impact Assessment report should include
the following items (not necessarily in the order shown):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ This Appendix is based on the World Bank Operational Manual,
OP 4.01, which is also in use under the Organization for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD) ``Common Approach.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Executive summary: concisely discusses significant
findings and recommended actions.
Policy, legal and administrative framework: discusses
the policy, legal, and administrative framework within which the
Environmental Impact Assessment is carried out.
Project description: describes the proposed project and
its geographic, ecological, social, and temporal context, including
any offsite investments that may be required (e.g., dedicated
pipelines, access roads, power plants, water supply, housing, and
raw material and product storage facilities). Indicates the need for
any resettlement or social development plan. Normally includes a map
showing the project site and the project's area of influence.
Baseline data: assesses the dimensions of the study
area and describes relevant physical, biological, and socio-economic
conditions, including any changes anticipated before the project
commences. Also, it takes into account current and proposed
development projects within the project area but not directly
connected to the project. Data should be relevant to decisions about
project location, design, operation, or mitigatory measures; the
section indicates accuracy, reliability and sources of the data.
Environmental Impacts: predicts and assesses the
project's likely positive and negative impacts, including the impact
on involuntary resettlement, indigenous peoples and cultural
property, in quantitative terms to the extent possible. It
identifies mitigation measures and any residual negative impacts
that cannot be mitigated. It explores opportunities for
environmental enhancement. Identifies and estimates the extent and
quality of available data, key data gaps, and uncertainties
associated with predictions, and specifies topics that do not
require further attention.
Analysis of alternatives: systematically compares
feasible alternatives to the proposed project site, technology,
design and operation-including the ``without project'' situation-in
terms of their potential environmental impacts; the feasibility of
mitigating these impacts; their capital and recurrent costs; their
suitability under local conditions; and their institutional,
training and monitoring requirements. For each of the alternatives,
it quantifies the environmental impacts to the extent possible, and
attaches economic values where feasible. It states the basis for
selecting the particular project design proposed and justifies
recommended emission levels and approaches to pollution prevention
and abatement.
Environmental Management Plan: describes mitigation,
monitoring and institutional measures to be taken during project
implementation to eliminate adverse impacts, offset them, or reduce
them to acceptable levels.
Consultation: lists and describes consultation
meetings, including consultations for obtaining the informed views
of the affected people, local nongovernmental organizations and
regulatory agencies.
[[Page 10694]]
Dated: February 28, 2005.
Frances C. McNaught,
Vice President, Domestic Relations, Millennium Challenge Corporation.
[FR Doc. 05-4216 Filed 3-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9210-01-U