Intent To Prepare a Joint Supplemental Environment Impact Statement/Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the San Luis Rey River Flood Control Project, Operations and Maintenance Plan; San Diego County, CA, 10608-10609 [05-4177]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
10608
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 42 / Friday, March 4, 2005 / Notices
A. Purpose
The time of delivery or performance
is an essential contract element and
must be clearly stated in solicitations
and contracts. The contracting officer
may set forth a required delivery
schedule or may allow an offeror to
propose an alternate delivery schedule.
The information is needed to assure
supplies or services are obtained in a
timely manner.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 3,440.
Responses Per Respondent: 5.
Total Responses: 17,200.
Hours Per Response: .167.
Total Burden Hours: 2,872.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
FAR Secretariat (V), 1800 F Street, NW,
Room 4035, Washington, DC 20405,
telephone (202) 501–4755. Please cite
OMB Control No. 9000–0043, Delivery
Schedules, in all correspondence.
Dated: February 24, 2005
Rodney P. Lantier
Director, Contract Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 05–4258 Filed 3–3–05; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Michael Jackson, Contract Policy
Division, GSA (202) 208–4949.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0153]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Submission for OMB Review; OMB
Circular A–119
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments regarding an extension to an
existing OMB clearance (9000–0153).
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Secretariat has submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) a
request to review and approve an
extension of a currently approved
information collection requirement
concerning OMB Circular A–119. A
request for public comments was
published at 69 FR 74504, December 14,
2004. No comments were received.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:07 Mar 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the FAR,
and whether it will have practical
utility; whether our estimate of the
public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on
valid assumptions and methodology;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, through the use of appropriate
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
April 4, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this
burden to the General Services
Administration, FAR Secretariat (V),
1800 F Streets, NW, Room 4035,
Washington, DC 20405. Please cite OMB
Control No.9000–0153, OMB Circular
A–119, in all correspondence.
A. Purpose
On February 19, 1998, a revised OMB
Circular A–119, ‘‘Federal Participation
in the Development and Use of
Voluntary Consensus Standards and in
Conformity Assessment Activities,’’ was
published in the Federal Register at 63
FR 8545, February 19, 1998. FAR
Subparts 11.1 and 11.2 were revised and
a solicitation provision was added at
52.211–7, Alternatives to GovernmentUnique Standards, to implement the
requirements of the revised OMB
circular. If an alternative standard is
proposed, the offeror must furnish data
and/or information regarding the
alternative in sufficient detail for the
Government to determine if it meets the
Government’s requirements.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 100.
Responses Per Respondent: 1.
Total Responses: 100.
Hours Per Response: 1.
Total Burden Hours: 100.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
FAR Secretariat (V), Room 4035, 1800 F
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405,
telephone (202) 501–4755. Please cite
OMB Control No. 9000–0153, OMB
Circular A–119, in all correspondence.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: February 24, 2005
Rodney P. Lantier
Director,Contract Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 05–4259 Filed 3–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Joint Supplemental
Environment Impact Statement/
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Report for the San Luis Rey River
Flood Control Project, Operations and
Maintenance Plan; San Diego County,
CA
Department of the Army; U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) and City of Oceanside
amends the notice published in the
Federal Register on June 8, 1999 (64 FR
30496), which announced the Corps’
intent to prepare a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the proposed reauthorization study
of the on-going flood control project on
the San Luis Rey River, City of
Oceanside, San Diego County,
California. This amendment to the
notice revises the June 8, 1999, notice to
announce the Corps’ intent to prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement/Environmental Impact Report
(SEIS/EIR) to address changes to the
operation and maintenance (O&M) plan
for the on-going flood control project on
the San Luis Rey River. The study area
is located in the City of Oceanside, in
the northwest portion of San Diego
County, California. The study area is
comprised of the lower 7.2 miles of the
river, from the Pacific Ocean to the
College Boulevard Bridge. The original
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) was dated September 25, 1970.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
April 4, 2008.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Los Angeles District, CESPL–
PD–RN, P.O. Box 532711, Los Angeles,
CA 90053–2325.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms
Tiffany Kayama; phone (213) 452–3845;
or e-mail:
tiffany.r.kayama@usace.army.mil.
Changes
to the O&M plan are necessary to
address Federal- and State-listed
endangered species that now inhabit the
project area and critical habitat that has
been designated within the project area.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 42 / Friday, March 4, 2005 / Notices
The changes are focused on vegetation
clearing and sediment removal to
provide for flood control consistent with
the project scope and authorization, and
eliminate or reduce potential effects to
listed species.
The Corps conducted a public scoping
meeting on June 16, 1999, in Oceanside,
California. This scoping meeting was
held to solicit public input on
significant environmental issues
associated with the on-going flood
control project. A second public scoping
meeting will not be held.
Useful information requested includes
other environmental studies, published
and unpublished data, and alternatives
that should be addressed in the analysis.
Individuals and agencies may offer
information relevant or data relevant to
the proposed study and provide
comments by mailing the information to
Ms. Tiffany Kayama (see DATES and
ADDRESSES). Request to be placed on the
mailing list for announcements and the
Draft SEIS/EIR also should be sent to
Ms. Kayama (see ADDRESSES).
A fully array of alternatives to the
proposed action will be developed for
analyses, including the no action plan.
Alex C. Dornstauder,
Colonel, U.S. Army, District Engineer.
[FR Doc. 05–4177 Filed 3–3–05; 8:45 am]
are environmentally beneficial, the
relative magnitude of the impacts in the
context of greater Everglades’s
restoration was determined not to be
significant. There are not expected to be
any adverse impacts on public health
and safety; the affected area (Acme
Basin B) is not environmentally unique;
the significant WCA–1 wetlands will
benefit by a relatively small increment,
as will Lake Worth Lagoon. No public
controversy related to the proposed
alternatives developed during scoping
for this project, nor are there high levels
of uncertainty, unique or unknown risks
associated with the study, nor have
surveys revealed the presence of any
significant wildlife, cultural resource
elements or contaminants.
An environmental Assessment will be
prepared and coordinated for the
proposed action. This document is
expected to be available in August 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Nancy Allen, Flood Control and Flood
Plain Management Section, Planning
Division, Jacksonville District, Corps of
Engineers, Post Office Box 4970,
Jacksonville, FL 32232–0019, Phone:
(904) 232–3206.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
BILLING CODE 3710–KF–M
Dated: February 22, 2005.
James C. Duck,
Chief, Planning Division.
[FR Doc. 05–4178 Filed 3–3–05; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
BILLING CODE 3710–AJ–M
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cancellation of the Notice of Intent To
Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the Acme Basin B
Discharge Project
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.
ACTION: Notice; cancellation.
AGENCY:
The Jacksonville District, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers hereby cancels
its Notice of Intent to prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
for the Acme Basin B Discharge Project,
as published in Federal Register on
Friday, May 24, 2002 (67 FR 36577).
The notice is canceled because,
during scoping for this project and
development of alternatives, it appeared
that each of the alternatives would affect
the same 410 acres of agricultural lands,
converting sugar cane into functional
wetlands, resulting in discharge of
cleaner water into Loxahatchee National
Wildlife Refuge (WCA–1), increasing the
spatial extent of Everglades wetlands
and reducing freshwater flows into Lake
Worth Lagoon. While all of these effects
SUMMARY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:07 Mar 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
National Advisory Committee on
Institutional Quality and Integrity;
Notice of Members
National Advisory Committee
on Institutional Quality and Integrity,
Department of Education.
AGENCY:
What Is the Purpose of This Notice?
The purpose of this notice is to list
the members of the National Advisory
Committee on Institutional Quality and
Integrity (National Advisory Committee)
and to give the public the opportunity
to nominate candidates for the positions
to be vacated by those members whose
terms will expire on September 30,
2005. This notice is required under
Section 114(c) of the Higher Education
Act (HEA), as amended.
What Is the Role of the National
Advisory Committee?
The National Advisory Committee is
established under Section 114 of the
HEA, as amended, and is composed of
15 members appointed by the Secretary
of Education from among individuals
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10609
who are representatives of, or
knowledgeable concerning, education
and training beyond secondary
education, including representatives of
all sectors and type of institutions of
higher education.
The National Advisory Committee
meets at least twice a year and provides
recommendations to the Secretary of
Education pertaining to:
• The establishment and enforcement
of criteria for recognition of accrediting
agencies or associations under subpart 2
of part H of Title IV, HEA.
• The recognition of specific
accrediting agencies or associations.
• The preparation and publication of
the list of nationally recognized
accrediting agencies and associations.
As the Committee deems necessary or
on request, the Committee also advises
the Secretary about:
• The eligibility and certification
process for institutions of higher
education under Title IV, HEA.
• The development of standards and
criteria for specific categories of
vocational training institutions and
institutions of higher education for
which there are no recognized
accrediting agencies, associations, or
State agencies in order to establish the
interim eligibility of those institutions
to participate in federally funded
programs.
• The relationship between (1)
accreditation of institutions of higher
education and the certification and
eligibility of such institutions, and (2)
State licensing responsibilities with
respect to such institutions.
• Any other advisory functions
relating to accreditation and
institutional eligibility that the
Secretary may prescribe.
What Are the Terms of Office for
Committee Members?
The term of office of each member is
3 years, except that any member
appointed to fill a vacancy occurring
prior to the expiration of the term for
which the member’s predecessor was
appointed is appointed for the
remainder of the term. A member may
be appointed, at the Secretary’s
discretion, to serve more than one term.
Who Are the Current Members of the
Committee?
The current members of the National
Advisory Committee are:
Members With Terms Expiring 9/30/05
• Honorable Randolph A. Beales,
Former Attorney General of Virginia,
and Attorney at Law, Christian &
Barton, LLP, Virginia.
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 42 (Friday, March 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10608-10609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4177]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Joint Supplemental Environment Impact
Statement/Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the San Luis Rey
River Flood Control Project, Operations and Maintenance Plan; San Diego
County, CA
AGENCY: Department of the Army; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and City of Oceanside
amends the notice published in the Federal Register on June 8, 1999 (64
FR 30496), which announced the Corps' intent to prepare a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed reauthorization
study of the on-going flood control project on the San Luis Rey River,
City of Oceanside, San Diego County, California. This amendment to the
notice revises the June 8, 1999, notice to announce the Corps' intent
to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental
Impact Report (SEIS/EIR) to address changes to the operation and
maintenance (O&M) plan for the on-going flood control project on the
San Luis Rey River. The study area is located in the City of Oceanside,
in the northwest portion of San Diego County, California. The study
area is comprised of the lower 7.2 miles of the river, from the Pacific
Ocean to the College Boulevard Bridge. The original Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS) was dated September 25, 1970.
DATES: Submit comments on or before April 4, 2008.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, CESPL-
PD-RN, P.O. Box 532711, Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms Tiffany Kayama; phone (213) 452-
3845; or e-mail: tiffany.r.kayama@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Changes to the O&M plan are necessary to
address Federal- and State-listed endangered species that now inhabit
the project area and critical habitat that has been designated within
the project area.
[[Page 10609]]
The changes are focused on vegetation clearing and sediment removal to
provide for flood control consistent with the project scope and
authorization, and eliminate or reduce potential effects to listed
species.
The Corps conducted a public scoping meeting on June 16, 1999, in
Oceanside, California. This scoping meeting was held to solicit public
input on significant environmental issues associated with the on-going
flood control project. A second public scoping meeting will not be
held.
Useful information requested includes other environmental studies,
published and unpublished data, and alternatives that should be
addressed in the analysis. Individuals and agencies may offer
information relevant or data relevant to the proposed study and provide
comments by mailing the information to Ms. Tiffany Kayama (see DATES
and ADDRESSES). Request to be placed on the mailing list for
announcements and the Draft SEIS/EIR also should be sent to Ms. Kayama
(see ADDRESSES).
A fully array of alternatives to the proposed action will be
developed for analyses, including the no action plan.
Alex C. Dornstauder,
Colonel, U.S. Army, District Engineer.
[FR Doc. 05-4177 Filed 3-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-KF-M
