Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Delays in Processing of Exemption Applications, 10472-10474 [05-4155]
Download as PDF
10472
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 41 / Thursday, March 3, 2005 / Notices
Rail Transit Systems, 65 FR 42626 (July
10, 2000).
In September 2004, the FRA Railroad
Safety Board granted an extension of
HARTLine’s original waiver and its
conditions for a period of eight months.
HARTLine is now notifying the FRA of
some modifications to its operating plan
and equipment, and is requesting a
permanent waiver of compliance, to
include these modifications.
Based on the foregoing and with some
modifications, HARTLine is seeking to
renew its existing waiver of compliance
from the provisions of the Code of
Federal Regulations, 49 CFR part 219—
Control of Alcohol and Drug Use, 49
CFR part 223 Safety Glazing Standards,
and 49 CFR part 238—Passenger
Equipment Safety Standards.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communication concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2002–
13398) and must be submitted to the
Docket Clerk, DOT Docket Management
Facility, Room PL–401 (Plaza Level),
400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. Communications received within
30 days of the date of this notice will
be considered by FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.—5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 23,
2005.
Grady C. Cothen,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 05–4140 Filed 3–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:38 Mar 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
with certain requirements of its safety
standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
involved, the nature of the relief being
requested, and the petitioner’s
arguments in favor of relief.
New Jersey Transit
[Docket Number FRA–2004–18577]
New Jersey Transit (NJ Transit) seeks
a modification to its waiver granted
September 29, 2004. NJ Transit was
granted a waiver of compliance from the
provisions of the Federal Track Safety
Standards, 49 CFR 213.345, subpart G,
regarding use of instrumented wheelset
tests (IWS) for vehicle qualification
testing of its new COMET V coach
equipment. In lieu of the IWS tests, NJ
Transit demonstrated similarity with inservice COMET IV coach equipment
through testing with accelerometers.
The testing verified that the design and
performance of each type of equipment
was substantially the same and NJ
Transit was granted a waiver allowing
its COMET V coach equipment to
operate at maximum speed of 100 mph
and three inches of cant deficiency on
AMTRAK’s NEC between Newark, NJ
and Philadelphia, PA.
NJ Transit is asking the Federal
Railroad Administration to modify the
language of the waiver to extend the
operating limits of this equipment to
New York City, NY, in order to
eliminate operational issues and the
need to list equipment on the Northeast
Corridor (NEC) timetable with different
speeds for different locations. NJ Transit
seeks further modification so that the
original waiver will also apply to
identical Metro North Railroad (MNCW)
COMET V coach equipment (NJ Transit
operates MNCW’s Port Jervis, NY Line
from Port Jervis, NY to Hoboken, NJ)
that is used interchangeably by NJ
Transit in NEC trainsets between
Newark, NJ and Philadelphia, PA.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communication concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2004–
18577) and must be submitted to the
Docket Clerk, DOT Docket Management
Facility, Room PL–401 (Plaza Level),
400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. Communications received within
30 days of the date of this notice will
be considered by FRA before final
action is taken. Comments received after
that date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 18,
2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety.
[FR Doc. 05–4139 Filed 3–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety;
Notice of Delays in Processing of
Exemption Applications
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: List of applications delayed
more than 180 days.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c),
PHMSA is publishing the following list
of exemption applications that have
been in process for 180 days or more.
The reason(s) for delay and the expected
completion date for action on each
application is provided in association
with each identified.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Delmer Billings, Office of Hazardous
Materials Exemptions and Approvals,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20590–0001, (202)
366–4535.
Key to ‘‘Reason for Delay’’
1. Awaiting additional information
from applicant.
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
10473
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 41 / Thursday, March 3, 2005 / Notices
2. Extensive public comment under
review.
3. Application is technically complex
and is of significant impact or
precedent-setting and requires extensive
analysis.
4. Staff review delayed by other
priority issues or volume of exemption
applications.
Meaning of Application Number
Suffixes
N—New application.
M—Modification request.
X—Renewal.
PM—Party to application with
modification request.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 28,
2005.
R. Ryan Posten,
Exemptions Program Officer, Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety, Exemptions and
Approvals.
NEW EXEMPTION APPLICATIONS
Reason
for delay
Application No.
Applicant
12381–N ...............
12950–N ...............
13183–N ...............
13176–N ...............
13422–N ...............
13054–N ...............
13188–N ...............
13281–N ...............
13265–N ...............
13776–N ...............
13599–N ...............
13636–N ...............
13582–N ...............
13563–N ...............
13547–N ...............
13482–N ...............
13346–N ...............
13347–N ...............
13856–N ...............
13858–N ...............
13859–N ...............
13860–N ...............
13341–N ...............
13302–N ...............
13314–N ...............
13309–N ...............
13295–N ...............
13266–N ...............
13228–N ...............
7277–M ................
10319–M ..............
12284–M ..............
6263–M ................
11536–M ..............
13027–M ..............
11579–M ..............
11241–M ..............
7280–M ................
10019–M ..............
8162–M ................
10915–M ..............
10878–M ..............
9421–M ................
12022–M ..............
8718–M ................
9649–X .................
Ideal Chemical & Supply Co., Memphis, TN ................................................................................
Walnut Industries, Inc., Bensalem, PA .........................................................................................
Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT .......................................................................................................
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Omaha, NE ............................................................................
Puritan Bennett, Plainfield, IN ......................................................................................................
CHS Transportation, Mason City, IA ............................................................................................
General Dynamics, Lincoln, NE ...................................................................................................
The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI ..................................................................................
Aeropres Corporation, Shreveport, LA .........................................................................................
MHF Logistical Solutions, Cranberry Twp., PA ............................................................................
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, PA ........................................................................
Timberline Environmental Services, Cold Springs, CA ................................................................
Linde Gas LLC (Linde), Independence, OH .................................................................................
Applied Companies, Valencia, CA ...............................................................................................
CP Industries, McKeesport, PA ....................................................................................................
U.S. Vanadium Corporation (Subsidiary of Strategic Minerals Corporation), Niagara Falls, NY
Stand-By-Systems, Inc., Dallas, TX .............................................................................................
ShipMate, Inc., Torrance, CA .......................................................................................................
Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI .........................................................................................
US Ecology Idaho, Inc. (USEI), Grand View, ID ..........................................................................
Degussa Corporation, Parsippany, NJ .........................................................................................
United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC), Paducah, KY ....................................................
National Propane Gas Association, Washington, DC ..................................................................
FIBA Technologies, Inc., Westboro, MA ......................................................................................
Sunoco Inc., Philadelphia, PA ......................................................................................................
OPW Engineered Systems, Lebanon, OH ...................................................................................
Taylor-Wharton, Harrisburg, PA ...................................................................................................
Luxfer Gas Cylinders, Riverside, CA ............................................................................................
AirSep Creekside Corp., Buffalo, NY ...........................................................................................
Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA ...........................................................................
Amtrol, Inc. West Warwick, RI ......................................................................................................
The American Traffic Safety Services Assn. (ATSSA), Fredericksburg, VA ...............................
Amtrol, Inc., West Warwick, RI .....................................................................................................
The Boeing Company, Los Angeles, CA .....................................................................................
Hernco Fabrication & Services, Midland, TX ...............................................................................
Dyno Nobel, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT ...........................................................................................
Rohm and Haas Co., Philadelphia, PA ........................................................................................
Department of Defense, Ft. Eustis, VA ........................................................................................
Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA ...........................................................................
Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA ...........................................................................
Luxfer Gas Cylinders (Composite Cylinder Division), Riverside, CA ...........................................
Tankcon FRP Inc., Boisbriand, Qc ...............................................................................................
Taylor-Wharton (Gas & Fluid Control Group), Harrisburg, PA .....................................................
Taylor-Wharton (Gas & Fluid Control Group), Harrisburg, PA .....................................................
Structural Composites Industries, Pomona, CA ...........................................................................
U.S. Department of Defense, Fort Eustis, VA ..............................................................................
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:38 Mar 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
Estimated date
of completion
2
4
4
4
3
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
4
1
1
4
3
4
1
4
4
4
4
1
4
3
3
1
1, 3
4
4
3
1
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
03–31–2005
04–30–2005
03–31–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
03–31–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
03–31–2005
03–31–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
03–31–2005
04–30–2005
03–31–2005
03–31–2005
03–31–2005
03–31–2005
03–31–2005
03–31–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
03–31–2005
03–31–2005
03–31–2005
03–31–2005
04–30–2005
04–30–2005
10474
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 41 / Thursday, March 3, 2005 / Notices
[FR Doc. 05–4155 Filed 3–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. RSPA–04–18757; Notice 2]
Pipeline Safety: Grant of Waiver;
Columbia Gas Transmission
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; grant of waiver.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of Pipeline Safety
(OPS) is granting Columbia Gas
Transmission’s (Columbia) petition for a
waiver of the pipeline safety regulations
to install fiberglass reinforced
polyethylene pipe in its high pressure
natural gas storage field operations.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Columbia has petitioned OPS for a
waiver from compliance with 49 CFR
192.53(c), 192.121, 192.123, and
192.619(a) to allow for installation and
operation of fiberglass reinforced
polyethylene pipe in its high pressure
natural gas storage field operations.
Columbia is proposing to install
approximately 4,200 feet of 4-inch
Fiber spooled, non-metallic composite
line pipe in its Dundee Storage Field.
On September 8, 2004, OPS published
a notice in the Federal Register
requesting public comment on
Columbia’s waiver request (69 FR
054345). The cities of Charlottesville
and Richmond, Virginia (jointly referred
to as ‘‘Cities’’) submitted several
comments in response to the Notice.
As Columbia customers, the Cities are
concerned that granting this waiver may
diminish Columbia’s ability to provide
reliable firm storage and natural gas
transportation service. The Cities
contends that if Columbia’s ability is
diminished, then, the Cities reliability
to deliver natural gas to its customers
may be diminished as well.
The following are the Cities
comments regarding Columbia’s petition
for waiver:
(1) Fiberspar’s fiberglass reinforced
polyethylene plastic pipe has no track
record thus it is difficult to determine
whether or not the proposed material is
reliable over the long term.
This waiver requires Columbia to
schedule five inspections to perform
both non-destructive and destructive
testing on this pipe material after
installation. The inspections and tests
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:38 Mar 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
will be performed 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10
years after installation. This waiver
requires Columbia to remove a
minimum ten foot pipe segment for
inspection during each inspection; nondestructive testing will focus on the
composition and degradation of the pipe
material and destructive testing will be
a hydrotest to burst pressure.
(2) The Cities commented that the
Fiber pipe material has not been tested
by an independent research authority.
Columbia and Fibers have been
engaged in meetings and discussion
regarding the research involved in the
development of this pipe material. OPS
is aware that Fiber has not had this
pipe material tested and rated before the
American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM)—an independent
research authority recognized by OPS—
OPS also believes that vendors like
Fiberspar’s should submit their
product(s) for proper testing and
development and meet ASTM
standards. For this reason and as a
condition of this waiver, OPS will limit
Columbia’s use of this pipe material to
five years unless Fiberrdquo; submits
this pipe material to ASTM for testing
and have this material listed as an
acceptable material meeting ASTM
requirement for new materials and have
a listing with the plastics pipe institute
(PPI) within five years of the pipe’s
original installation. If Fiberrdquo;
fails to submit this pipe material to
ASTM for testing, Columbia will be
required to discontinue use of this pipe
material at the end of the 5th year
following installation and conform to
the regulatory requirements of 49 CFR
§§ 192.53(c), 192.121, 192.123, and
192.619(a). If it is determined that the
commodity transported in this pipeline
is not compatible with, and proves
detrimental to, this pipe material, OPS
reserves the right, as a condition of this
waiver, to curtail or discontinue the use
of this pipe material.
(3)The Cities commented that it will
be unable to deliver firm storage service
to its customers if Columbia determines
this pipe material to be unreliable.
Columbia’s responsibility to provide
reliable gas service to its customers is
not diminished by this waiver or its use
of this pipe material. By issuing this
waiver, OPS believes Columbia will
continue to provide reliable service to
its customers. If it is determined that the
commodity transported in this pipeline
is not compatible with, and proves
detrimental to, this pipe material, OPS
reserves the right, as a condition of this
waiver, to curtail or discontinue the use
of this pipe material.
(4) The Cities commented that the
0.67 service (design) factor contained in
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the design formula results in a lower
safety factor than the 0.32 design factor
contained in the design formula under
§ 192.121.
Columbia seeks approval to use the
following design formula from API
15HR:
Pr = Ss × Sf × (Ri2¥R02) / (R02 + Ri2)
Where:
Pr = Fiber Line Pipe Standard Pressure
Rating, psig
Ss = 95 percent Lower Confidence Limit
(LCL) of the Long-Term Hydrostatic
Strength (LTHS) @ 20 years per
ASTM D 2992, Procedure B, psig
Sf = 0.67 service (design) factor per API
15 HR.
R0 = radius of the pipe at the outside of
the minimum reinforced wall
thickness, inches
Ri = radius of the pipe at the inside of
the minimum reinforced wall
thickness, inches
Fiberspar uses a service factor in its
calculation of the Standard Pressure
Rating, Pr, which is 25% less than the
maximum service factor required by API
15HR. API 15HR requires a service
factor of 0.67. By using a service factor
which is 25% less, the result is an
increase in the long-term reliability of
this pipe material.
(5) The Cities commented that
Columbia’s choice to use plastic pipe
increases the risk of pipe damage by a
backhoe.
This waiver does not waive
Columbia’s responsibility to meet the
excavation requirements of the Federal
pipeline safety standards. Columbia is
required to have excavation procedures
in their Operations and Maintenance
manual and their personnel are
expected to be familiar with and follow
those procedures whenever construction
near the pipeline is being performed.
(6) The Cities commented that
Columbia did not specify how they
intend to comply with the requirements
of one-call notification.
Columbia is required to have a
damage prevention program in place
and documented in their Operations
and Maintenance manual. Columbia’s
personnel are expected to be familiar
with and follow that program whenever
events required them to do so. The
waiver does not relieve Columbia from
its responsibility to meet the one-call
notification requirements of the Federal
pipeline safety standards.
Grant of Waiver
Based on the above information, OPS
hereby grants Columbia’s request for
waiver from the requirements of 49 CFR
§§ 192.53(c), 192.121, 192.123, and
192.619(a). The waiver allows Columbia
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 41 (Thursday, March 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10472-10474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4155]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Delays in
Processing of Exemption Applications
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: List of applications delayed more than 180 days.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c),
PHMSA is publishing the following list of exemption applications that
have been in process for 180 days or more. The reason(s) for delay and
the expected completion date for action on each application is provided
in association with each identified.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delmer Billings, Office of Hazardous
Materials Exemptions and Approvals, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001, (202) 366-4535.
Key to ``Reason for Delay''
1. Awaiting additional information from applicant.
[[Page 10473]]
2. Extensive public comment under review.
3. Application is technically complex and is of significant impact
or precedent-setting and requires extensive analysis.
4. Staff review delayed by other priority issues or volume of
exemption applications.
Meaning of Application Number Suffixes
N--New application.
M--Modification request.
X--Renewal.
PM--Party to application with modification request.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 28, 2005.
R. Ryan Posten,
Exemptions Program Officer, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety,
Exemptions and Approvals.
New Exemption Applications
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason Estimated date
Application No. Applicant for delay of completion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
12381-N.................. Ideal Chemical & 2 04-30-2005
Supply Co.,
Memphis, TN.
12950-N.................. Walnut Industries, 4 04-30-2005
Inc., Bensalem,
PA.
13183-N.................. Becton Dickinson, 4 04-30-2005
Sandy, UT.
13176-N.................. Union Pacific 4 04-30-2005
Railroad Company,
Omaha, NE.
13422-N.................. Puritan Bennett, 3 04-30-2005
Plainfield, IN.
13054-N.................. CHS 4 04-30-2005
Transportation,
Mason City, IA.
13188-N.................. General Dynamics, 3 04-30-2005
Lincoln, NE.
13281-N.................. The Dow Chemical 4 04-30-2005
Company, Midland,
MI.
13265-N.................. Aeropres 4 03-31-2005
Corporation,
Shreveport, LA.
13776-N.................. MHF Logistical 4 04-30-2005
Solutions,
Cranberry Twp.,
PA.
13599-N.................. Air Products and 4 03-31-2005
Chemicals, Inc.,
Allentown, PA.
13636-N.................. Timberline 4 04-30-2005
Environmental
Services, Cold
Springs, CA.
13582-N.................. Linde Gas LLC 4 04-30-2005
(Linde),
Independence, OH.
13563-N.................. Applied Companies, 4 04-30-2005
Valencia, CA.
13547-N.................. CP Industries, 4 04-30-2005
McKeesport, PA.
13482-N.................. U.S. Vanadium 4 03-31-2005
Corporation
(Subsidiary of
Strategic
Minerals
Corporation),
Niagara Falls, NY.
13346-N.................. Stand-By-Systems, 1 04-30-2005
Inc., Dallas, TX.
13347-N.................. ShipMate, Inc., 4 04-30-2005
Torrance, CA.
13856-N.................. Dow Chemical 4 03-31-2005
Company, Midland,
MI.
13858-N.................. US Ecology Idaho, 4 03-31-2005
Inc. (USEI),
Grand View, ID.
13859-N.................. Degussa 4 04-30-2005
Corporation,
Parsippany, NJ.
13860-N.................. United States 4 04-30-2005
Enrichment
Corporation
(USEC), Paducah,
KY.
13341-N.................. National Propane 1 04-30-2005
Gas Association,
Washington, DC.
13302-N.................. FIBA Technologies, 4 04-30-2005
Inc., Westboro,
MA.
13314-N.................. Sunoco Inc., 4 04-30-2005
Philadelphia, PA.
13309-N.................. OPW Engineered 4 04-30-2005
Systems, Lebanon,
OH.
13295-N.................. Taylor-Wharton, 1 04-30-2005
Harrisburg, PA.
13266-N.................. Luxfer Gas 1 04-30-2005
Cylinders,
Riverside, CA.
13228-N.................. AirSep Creekside 4 04-30-2005
Corp., Buffalo,
NY.
7277-M................... Structural 3 04-30-2005
Composites
Industries,
Pomona, CA.
10319-M.................. Amtrol, Inc. West 4 03-31-2005
Warwick, RI.
12284-M.................. The American 1 04-30-2005
Traffic Safety
Services Assn.
(ATSSA),
Fredericksburg,
VA.
6263-M................... Amtrol, Inc., West 4 03-31-2005
Warwick, RI.
11536-M.................. The Boeing 4 03-31-2005
Company, Los
Angeles, CA.
13027-M.................. Hernco Fabrication 4 03-31-2005
& Services,
Midland, TX.
11579-M.................. Dyno Nobel, Inc., 4 03-31-2005
Salt Lake City,
UT.
11241-M.................. Rohm and Haas Co., 1 03-31-2005
Philadelphia, PA.
7280-M................... Department of 4 03-31-2005
Defense, Ft.
Eustis, VA.
10019-M.................. Structural 3 04-30-2005
Composites
Industries,
Pomona, CA.
8162-M................... Structural 3 04-30-2005
Composites
Industries,
Pomona, CA.
10915-M.................. Luxfer Gas 1 03-31-2005
Cylinders
(Composite
Cylinder
Division),
Riverside, CA.
10878-M.................. Tankcon FRP Inc., 1, 3 03-31-2005
Boisbriand, Qc.
9421-M................... Taylor-Wharton 4 03-31-2005
(Gas & Fluid
Control Group),
Harrisburg, PA.
12022-M.................. Taylor-Wharton 4 03-31-2005
(Gas & Fluid
Control Group),
Harrisburg, PA.
8718-M................... Structural 3 04-30-2005
Composites
Industries,
Pomona, CA.
9649-X................... U.S. Department of 1 04-30-2005
Defense, Fort
Eustis, VA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 10474]]
[FR Doc. 05-4155 Filed 3-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-M