Action Affecting Export Privileges; Mr. Kiarash Arastafar In the Matter of: Mr. Kiarash Arastafar, Westboschlaan, 151A, 2265 EN Leidschendam, The Netherlands, Respondent; Order Relating to Kiarash Arastafar, 10355-10356 [05-4057]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 41 / Thursday, March 3, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[03–BIS–14]
Action Affecting Export Privileges; Mr.
Kiarash Arastafar In the Matter of: Mr.
Kiarash Arastafar, Westboschlaan,
151A, 2265 EN Leidschendam, The
Netherlands, Respondent; Order
Relating to Kiarash Arastafar
The Bureau of Industry and Security,
U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’)
having initiated an administrative
proceeding against Kiarash Arastafar,
pursuant to section 766.3 of the Export
Administration Regulations (currently
codified at 15 CFR parts 730–774
(2004)) (‘‘Regulations’’),1 and Section
13(c) of the Export Administration Act
of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app.
2401–2420 (2000)) (‘‘Act’’),2 by issuing
a charging letter to Kiarash Arastafar
that alleged that Kiarash Arastafar
committed three violations of the
Regulations. Specifically, the charges
are:
1. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(c)—
Solicitation of the Unlicensed Export of
Items to Iran: From on or about July 15,
2002, to on or about January 28, 2003,
Kiarash Arastafar solicited the export of
gas processor parts, items subject both
to the Regulations (EAR99 3) and the
Iranian Transactions Regulations of the
Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign
Assets Control (‘‘OFAC’’) and located in
the United States, to Iran through the
Netherlands without the authorization
from OFAC required by section 746.7 of
the Regulations.
2. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(e)—
Acting with Knowledge of a Violation:
In connection with the solicitation
referenced in paragraph 1 above,
Kiarash Arastafar ordered the above1 The charged violations occurred in 2002 and
2003. The Regulations governing the violations at
issue are found in the 2002 and 2003 versions of
the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2002–2003)). The 2004 Regulations establish
the procedures that apply to this matter.
2 From August 21, 1994, through November 12,
2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the
President, through Executive Order 12924, which
had been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3
CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)), continued the
Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–
1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). On November 13, 2000, the
Act was reauthorized and it remained in effect
through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), as extended by the Notice
of August 6, 2004 (69 FR 48763, August 10, 2004),
has continued the Regulations in effect under the
IEEPA.
3 The term ‘‘EAR99’’ refers to items subject to the
Regulations that are not listed on the Commerce
Control List. See 15 CFR 734.3(c).
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:38 Mar 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
described items with knowledge that a
violation of the Regulations was
intended to occur in connection with
the items. Kiarash Arastafar knew that
U.S. government authorization was
required for the purported export and
would not be obtained.
3. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(h)—
Attempting to Evade the Provisions of
the Regulations: In connection with the
solicitation referenced in paragraph 1
above, Kiarash Arastafar took action
with the intent to evade the Regulations
by urging the purported exporter to ship
the items in question to the Netherlands
from the United States, with the
understanding that the items would
subsequently be shipped to Iran (a
destination requiring an export license
for these items).
Whereas, BIS and Kiarash Arastafar
have entered into a Settlement
Agreement pursuant to section 766.18(b)
of the Regulations whereby they agreed
to settle this matter in accordance with
the terms and conditions set forth
therein; and
Whereas, I have approved of the terms
of such Settlement Agreement; It is
therefore ordered:
First, that for a period of 15 years from
the date of entry of this Order, Kiarash
Arastafar, Westboschlaan, 151A, 2265
EN Leidschendam, The Netherlands,
and when acting for or on behalf of
Kiarash Arastafar, his representatives,
agents, assigns or employees (‘‘Denied
Person’’) may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software, or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations, including,
but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10355
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Kiarash Arastafar
by affiliation, ownership, control, or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
made subject to the provisions of the
Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not
prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the Regulations
where the only items involved that are
subject to the Regulations are the
foreign-produced direct product of U.S.origin technology.
Fifth, that a copy of this Order shall
be delivered to the United States Coast
Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 Gay
Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202–
4022, notifying that office that this case
is withdrawn from adjudication, as
provided by section 766.18 of the
Regulations.
Sixth, that the charging letter, the
Settlement Agreement, and this Order
shall be made available to the public
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
10356
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 41 / Thursday, March 3, 2005 / Notices
and record of the case as described in
section 766.22 of the Regulations.
Seventh, that this Order shall be
served on the Denied Person and on
BIS, and shall be published in the
Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the final
agency action in this matter, is effective
immediately.
Entered this 24th day of February, 2005.
Wendy L. Wysong,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05–4057 Filed 3–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[03–BIS–13]
Action Affecting Export Privileges;
Chemical Industries Consolidated B.V.
In the Matter of: Chemical Industries
Consolidated b.v., Westboschlaan,
151A, 2265 EN Leidschendam, The
Netherlands, Respondent; Order
Relating to Chemical Industries
Consolidated B.V.
The Bureau of Industry and Security,
U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’)
having initiated an administrative
proceeding against Chemical Industries
Consolidated b.v. (‘‘CIC’’), pursuant to
section 766.3 of the Export
Administration Regulations (currently
codified at 15 CFR parts 730–774
(2004)) (‘‘Regulations’’),1 and section
13(c) of the Export Administration Act
of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app.
2401–2420 (2000)) (‘‘Act’’),2 by issuing
a charging letter to CIC that alleged that
CIC committed three violations of the
Regulations. Specifically, the charges
are:
1. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(c)—
Solicitation of the Unlicensed Export of
1 The charged violations occurred in 2002 and
2003. The Regulations governing the violations at
issue are found in the 2002 and 2003 versions of
the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2002–2003)). The 2004 Regulations establish
the procedures that apply to this matter.
2 From August 21, 1994, through November 12,
2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the
President, through Executive Order 12924, which
had been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3
CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)), continued the
Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–
1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). On November 13, 2000, the
Act was reauthorized and it remained in effect
through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp 783 (2002)), as extended by the Notice
of August 6, 2004 (69 FR 48763, August 10, 2004),
has continued the Regulations in effect under the
IEEPA.
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:38 Mar 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
Items to Iran: From on or about July 15,
2002, to on or about January 28, 2003,
CIC solicited the export of gas processor
parts, items subject both to the
Regulations (EAR99 3) and the Iranian
Transactions Regulations of the
Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign
Assets Control (‘‘OFAC’’) and located in
the United States, to Iran through the
Netherlands without the authorization
from OFAC required by section 746.7 of
the Regulations.
2. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(e)—
Acting with Knowledge of a Violation:
In connection with the solicitation
referenced in paragraph 1 above, CIC
ordered the above-described items with
knowledge that a violation of the
Regulations was intended to occur in
connection with the items.
3. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(h)—
Attempting To Evade the Provisions of
the Regulations: In connection with the
solicitation referenced in paragraph 1
above, CIC took action with the intent
to evade the Regulations by urging the
purported exporter to ship the items in
question to the Netherlands from the
United States, with the understanding
that CIC would subsequently ship the
items to Iran (a destination requiring an
export license for these items).
Whereas, BIS and CIC have entered
into a Settlement Agreement pursuant to
section 766.18(b) of the Regulations
whereby they agreed to settle this matter
in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth therein; and
Whereas, I have approved of the terms
of such Settlement Agreement; It is
therefore ordered:
First, that for a period of five years
from the date of entry of this Order,
Chemical Industries Consolidated b.v.,
151A, 2265 EN Leidschendam, The
Netherlands, its successors or assigns,
and when acting for or on behalf of CIC,
its officers, representatives, agents, or
employees (‘‘Denied Person’’) may not,
directly or indirectly, participate in any
way in any transaction involving any
commodity, software, or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations, including,
but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
3 The term ‘‘EAR99’’ refers to items subject to the
Regulations that are not listed on the Commerce
Control List. See 15 CFR 734.3(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the Regulations, any
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to CIC by
affiliation, ownership, control, or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
made subject to the provisions of the
Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not
prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the Regulations
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 41 (Thursday, March 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10355-10356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-4057]
[[Page 10355]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[03-BIS-14]
Action Affecting Export Privileges; Mr. Kiarash Arastafar In the
Matter of: Mr. Kiarash Arastafar, Westboschlaan, 151A, 2265 EN
Leidschendam, The Netherlands, Respondent; Order Relating to Kiarash
Arastafar
The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce
(``BIS'') having initiated an administrative proceeding against Kiarash
Arastafar, pursuant to section 766.3 of the Export Administration
Regulations (currently codified at 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2004))
(``Regulations''),\1\ and Section 13(c) of the Export Administration
Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420 (2000)) (``Act''),\2\
by issuing a charging letter to Kiarash Arastafar that alleged that
Kiarash Arastafar committed three violations of the Regulations.
Specifically, the charges are:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The charged violations occurred in 2002 and 2003. The
Regulations governing the violations at issue are found in the 2002
and 2003 versions of the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR parts
730-774 (2002-2003)). The 2004 Regulations establish the procedures
that apply to this matter.
\2\ From August 21, 1994, through November 12, 2000, the Act was
in lapse. During that period, the President, through Executive Order
12924, which had been extended by successive Presidential Notices,
the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3 CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)),
continued the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706 (2000))
(``IEEPA''). On November 13, 2000, the Act was reauthorized and it
remained in effect through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), as extended
by the Notice of August 6, 2004 (69 FR 48763, August 10, 2004), has
continued the Regulations in effect under the IEEPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(c)--Solicitation of the Unlicensed
Export of Items to Iran: From on or about July 15, 2002, to on or about
January 28, 2003, Kiarash Arastafar solicited the export of gas
processor parts, items subject both to the Regulations (EAR99 \3\) and
the Iranian Transactions Regulations of the Treasury Department's
Office of Foreign Assets Control (``OFAC'') and located in the United
States, to Iran through the Netherlands without the authorization from
OFAC required by section 746.7 of the Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The term ``EAR99'' refers to items subject to the
Regulations that are not listed on the Commerce Control List. See 15
CFR 734.3(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(e)--Acting with Knowledge of a
Violation: In connection with the solicitation referenced in paragraph
1 above, Kiarash Arastafar ordered the above-described items with
knowledge that a violation of the Regulations was intended to occur in
connection with the items. Kiarash Arastafar knew that U.S. government
authorization was required for the purported export and would not be
obtained.
3. One Violation of 15 CFR 764.2(h)--Attempting to Evade the
Provisions of the Regulations: In connection with the solicitation
referenced in paragraph 1 above, Kiarash Arastafar took action with the
intent to evade the Regulations by urging the purported exporter to
ship the items in question to the Netherlands from the United States,
with the understanding that the items would subsequently be shipped to
Iran (a destination requiring an export license for these items).
Whereas, BIS and Kiarash Arastafar have entered into a Settlement
Agreement pursuant to section 766.18(b) of the Regulations whereby they
agreed to settle this matter in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth therein; and
Whereas, I have approved of the terms of such Settlement Agreement;
It is therefore ordered:
First, that for a period of 15 years from the date of entry of this
Order, Kiarash Arastafar, Westboschlaan, 151A, 2265 EN Leidschendam,
The Netherlands, and when acting for or on behalf of Kiarash Arastafar,
his representatives, agents, assigns or employees (``Denied Person'')
may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity, software, or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be
exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or
in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not
limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other
activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
Third, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided
in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to Kiarash Arastafar by affiliation,
ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of
trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of
the Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or
other transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items
involved that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced
direct product of U.S.-origin technology.
Fifth, that a copy of this Order shall be delivered to the United
States Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 Gay Street, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202-4022, notifying that office that this case is withdrawn
from adjudication, as provided by section 766.18 of the Regulations.
Sixth, that the charging letter, the Settlement Agreement, and this
Order shall be made available to the public
[[Page 10356]]
and record of the case as described in section 766.22 of the
Regulations.
Seventh, that this Order shall be served on the Denied Person and
on BIS, and shall be published in the Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the final agency action in this
matter, is effective immediately.
Entered this 24th day of February, 2005.
Wendy L. Wysong,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 05-4057 Filed 3-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M