San Diego & Imperial Valley Railroad Company, Inc.-Lease and Operation Exemption-BNSF Railway Company 1, 10165 [05-3985]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 40 / Wednesday, March 2, 2005 / Notices
This notice of receipt of Workhorse’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
Affected are a total of approximately
42,524 incomplete motor home chassis
built between July 2000 and December
31, 2004. S3.1.4.1 of FMVSS No. 102
requires that
if the transmission shift lever sequence
includes a park position, identification of
shift lever positions * * * shall be displayed
in view of the driver whenever any of the
following conditions exist: (a) The ignition is
in a position where the transmission can be
shifted. (b) The transmission is not in park.
Workhorse describes its noncompliance
as follows:
In these vehicles when the ignition key is
in the ‘‘OFF’’ position, the selected gear
position is not displayed. ‘‘OFF’’ is a position
not displayed, but located between lock and
run. The gear selector lever can be moved
while the ignition switch is in ‘‘OFF.’’
Workhorse believes that the
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety and that no
corrective action is warranted.
Workhorse states that:
[T]he vehicles will be in compliance with
FMVSS No. 102 during normal ignition
activation and vehicle operation. Workhorse
believes that the purpose of the rule is to
provide the driver with transmission position
information for the vehicle conditions where
such information can reduce the likelihood
of shifting errors. This occurs primarily when
the engine is running, and Workhorse’s
PRNDL is always visible when the engine is
running.
Should the shift lever be in any position
other than park or neutral, the ignition will
not start * * * Should the Workhorse
vehicle be in neutral at the time the ignition
is turned to start, the display will
immediately come on and be visible to the
driver.
There are a number of safeguards to
preclude the driver from leaving the vehicle
with the vehicle in a position other than in
the park position. First, if the driver should
attempt to remove the key, the driver will
discover that the vehicle is not in park
because the key may not be removed. * * *
If the driver were to attempt to leave the
vehicle without removing the key, the
audible warning required by FMVSS No. 114
would immediately sound reminding the
driver that the key is still in the vehicle.
Workhorse states that this situation is
substantially the same as for two
petitions which NHTSA granted, one
from General Motors (58 FR 33296, June
16, 1993) and the second from Nissan
Motors (64 FR 38701, June 19, 1999).
Workhorse says, ‘‘In both of those cases,
the PRNDL display would not be
illuminated if the transmission was left
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:00 Mar 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
in a position other than ‘park’ when the
ignition key was turned to ‘OFF.’ ’’
Workhorse states that it has no
customer complaints or accident reports
related to the noncompliance.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments on the petition described
above. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited at the
beginning of this notice and be
submitted by any of the following
methods. Mail: Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Nassif Building, Room
PL–401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, 20590–0001. Hand
Delivery: Room PL–401 on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC. It
is requested, but not required, that two
copies of the comments be provided.
The Docket Section is open on
weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays. Comments may be
submitted electronically by logging onto
the Docket Management System Web
site at https://dms.dot.gov. Click on
‘‘Help’’ to obtain instructions for filing
the document electronically. Comments
may be faxed to 1–202–493–2251, or
may be submitted to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
The petition, supporting materials,
and all comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated below will be filed and will be
considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied,
notice of the decision will be published
in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated below.
Comment closing date: April 1, 2005.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and
501.8.
Issued on: February 22, 2005.
Ronald L. Medford,
Senior Associate Administrator for Vehicle
Safety.
[FR Doc. 05–3991 Filed 3–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
PO 00000
10165
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34638]
San Diego & Imperial Valley Railroad
Company, Inc.—Lease and Operation
Exemption—BNSF Railway Company 1
San Diego & Imperial Valley Railroad
Company, Inc. (SDIV), a Class III rail
carrier, has filed a verified notice of
exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to
lease and operate, pursuant to an
agreement with BNSF Railway
Company (BNSF), approximately 1.35
miles of BNSF’s permanent and
exclusive reserved rail freight service
easement located between milepost
19.85, west of Escondido, and at or near
milepost 21.2, at the eastern end of the
rail corridor in Escondido, in San Diego
County, CA.
SDIV certifies that its projected
annual revenues as a result of this
transaction will not result in SDIV’s
becoming a Class II rail carrier, and
further certifies that its projected annual
revenues will not exceed $5 million.
The transaction is expected to be
consummated on March 1, 2005.
If the notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 34638, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 1925
K Street NW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, one copy of each
pleading must be served on Gary A.
Laakso, Esq., Vice President Regulatory
Counsel, San Diego & Imperial Valley
Railroad Company, Inc., 5300 Broken
Sound Blvd., NW., Boca Raton, FL
33487, and Louis E. Gitomer, Esq., Of
Counsel, Ball Janik LLP, Suite 225, 1455
F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: February 22, 2005.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–3985 Filed 3–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
1 Effective January 20, 2005, the name of ‘‘The
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway
Company’’ was changed to ‘‘BNSF Railway
Company.’’
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 10165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-3985]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34638]
San Diego & Imperial Valley Railroad Company, Inc.--Lease and
Operation Exemption--BNSF Railway Company \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Effective January 20, 2005, the name of ``The Burlington
Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company'' was changed to ``BNSF
Railway Company.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
San Diego & Imperial Valley Railroad Company, Inc. (SDIV), a Class
III rail carrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR
1150.41 to lease and operate, pursuant to an agreement with BNSF
Railway Company (BNSF), approximately 1.35 miles of BNSF's permanent
and exclusive reserved rail freight service easement located between
milepost 19.85, west of Escondido, and at or near milepost 21.2, at the
eastern end of the rail corridor in Escondido, in San Diego County, CA.
SDIV certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of
this transaction will not result in SDIV's becoming a Class II rail
carrier, and further certifies that its projected annual revenues will
not exceed $5 million.
The transaction is expected to be consummated on March 1, 2005.
If the notice contains false or misleading information, the
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB
Finance Docket No. 34638, must be filed with the Surface Transportation
Board, 1925 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one
copy of each pleading must be served on Gary A. Laakso, Esq., Vice
President Regulatory Counsel, San Diego & Imperial Valley Railroad
Company, Inc., 5300 Broken Sound Blvd., NW., Boca Raton, FL 33487, and
Louis E. Gitomer, Esq., Of Counsel, Ball Janik LLP, Suite 225, 1455 F
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http:/
/www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: February 22, 2005.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-3985 Filed 3-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P