Public Comment on Data, Studies, or Other Evidence Related to the Effects of Credit Scores and Credit-Based Insurance Scores on the Availability and Affordability of Financial Products, 9652-9655 [05-3781]
Download as PDF
9652
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 38 / Monday, February 28, 2005 / Notices
Trans No.
Acquiring
Acquired
Entities
Walter M. Curt ........................................
Kristen Talley ..........................................
Steve Thomas .........................................
Saratoga Partners IV, L.P ......................
Urban Communicators PCS Limited
Partnership.
Alec E. Gores .........................................
Vincent F. Carosella ...............................
Motient Corporation ................................
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co .......................
Education Lending Group, Inc. ...............
Richard Postma ......................................
Shenandoah Electronic Intelligence, Inc.
Webroot Software, Inc.
Webroot Software, Inc.
Sericol Group LImited.
Urban Comm-North Carolina, Inc.
20050512
20050514
20050515
20050517
20050523
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
SI International Inc ..................................
TCV V, L.P ..............................................
TCV V, L.P ..............................................
Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd ..........................
Verizon Communications Inc ..................
20050529
20050531
20050532
20050534
20050535
20050546
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
Concord Communications, Inc ...............
Mr. Remi Marcoux ..................................
Dr. Rajendra Singh .................................
Thomas J. Petters ..................................
CIT Group Inc .........................................
Yell Group PLC .......................................
Aprisma Holdings, Inc.
JDM, Inc.
Motient Corporation.
Polaroid Holding Company.
Education Lending Group, Inc.
U.S. Xchange Directors, L.L.C.
TRANSACTIONS GRANTED EARLY TERMINATION—02/01/2005
20050363 .........
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings.
U.S. Pathology Labs, Inc. .......................
U.S. Pathology Labs, Inc.
TRANSACTIONS GRANTED EARLY TERMINATION—02/02/2005
20050508 .........
20050513 .........
20050519 .........
Harbour Group Investments IV, L.P .......
PNM Resources, Inc ...............................
GTCR Fund VII–A, L.P ...........................
LN Holdings Corporation ........................
SW Acquisition, L.P ................................
GTCR Fund VII, L.P ...............................
LN Holdings Corporation.
TNP Enterprises, Inc.
Syniverse Holdings, Inc.
TRANSACTIONS GRANTED EARLY TERMINATION—02/03/2005
20050438 .........
Hejoassu Adminstracao S.A. ..................
Cemex, S.A. de C.V. ..............................
Cemex, S.A. de C.V.
TRANSACTIONS GRANTED EARLY TERMINATION—02/04/2005
20050327
20050522
20050528
20050537
20050539
20050540
20050551
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
Transpro, Inc ...........................................
VeriSign, Inc ...........................................
Cerberus-Plasma Holdings, Inc ..............
Noble Energy, Inc ...................................
JPMorgan Chase & Co ...........................
Caesars Entertainment, Inc ....................
Orkla ASA ...............................................
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative,
or Renee Hallman, Case Management
Assistant. Federal Trade Commission,
Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of
Competition, Room H–303, Washington,
DC 20580. (202) 326–33100.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–3780 Filed 2–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–M
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
RIN [3084–AA94]
Public Comment on Data, Studies, or
Other Evidence Related to the Effects
of Credit Scores and Credit-Based
Insurance Scores on the Availability
and Affordability of Financial Products
Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for public
comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Fair and Accurate Credit
Transactions Act of 2003 (‘‘FACT Act’’)
or ‘‘Act’’) requires the Federal Trade
Commission (‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:36 Feb 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Modine Manufacturing Company ............
LightSurf Technologies, Inc ....................
NPS Bio Therapeutics, Inc .....................
Patina Oil & Gas Corporation .................
Vastera, Inc .............................................
Caesars Entertainment, Inc ....................
Elkem ASA ..............................................
and the Federal Reserve Board
(‘‘Board’’) to conduct a study on the
effects of credit scores and credit-based
insurance scores on the availability and
affordability of financial products.
These products include credit cards,
mortgages, auto loans, and property and
casualty insurance. As part of its efforts
to fulfill its obligations under the Act,
the FTC seeks public comment on any
evidence the FTC and the Board should
consider in conducting the study.
DATES: Comments must be received by
April 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Public comments are
invited, and may be filed with the
Commission in either paper or
electronic form. Comments filed in
paper form should refer to ‘‘FACT Act
Scores Study’’ both in the text and on
the envelope, to facilitate their
organization, and should be mailed or
delivered to: Federal Trade
Commission/Office of the Secretary,
Room H–159 (Annex Z), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580. The FTC
requests that any comment filed in
paper form be sent by courier or
overnight service, if possible, because
U.S. postal mail in the Washington area
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Modine Aftermarket Holdings, Inc.
LightSurf Technologies, Inc.
NPS Bio Therapeutics, Inc.
Patina Oil & Gas Corporation.
Vastera, Inc.
RDI/Caesars Riverboat Casino, LLC.
Elkem ASA.
and at the Commission is subject to
delay due to heightened security
precautions.
Comments may be filed in electronic
form by clicking on the following:
https://score.commentworks.com/
FTCCreditScoreStudy/ and following
the instructions on the web-based form.
If a comment contains confidential
information, it must be filed in paper
(rather than electronic) form, and the
first page of the document must be
clearly labeled ‘‘Confidential.’’ 1
To ensure that the Commission
considers an electronic comment, you
must file it on web-based form at https:/
/secure.commentworks.com/
FTTCreditScoreStudy/. You also may
visit https://www.regulations.gov to read
this Notice, and may file an electronic
comment through that website. The
1 Commission Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The
comment must also be accompanied by an explicit
request for confidential treatment, including the
factual and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the comment to be
withheld from the public record. The request will
be granted or denied by the Commission’s General
Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the
public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c).
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 38 / Monday, February 28, 2005 / Notices
Commission will consider all comments
that regulations.gov forwards to it.
The FTC Act and other laws the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. All timely and responsive
public comments, whether filed in
paper or electronic form, will be
considered by the Commission, and will
be available to the public on the FTC
Web site, to the extent practicable, at
https://www.ftc.gov. As a matter of
discretion, the FTC makes every effort to
remove home contact information for
individuals from the public comments it
receives before placing those comments
on the FTC Web site. More information,
including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC’s
privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/
ftc/privacy.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jesse Leary, Deputy Assistant Director,
(202) 326–326–3480, Division of
Consumer Protection, Bureau of
Economics, Federal Trade Commission,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FACT Act was signed into law on
December 4, 2005. Fair and Accurate
Credit Transactions Act of 2003, Pub. L.
No. 108–159 (2003). In general, the Act
amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act
(‘‘FCRA’’) to enhance the accuracy of
consumer reports and to allow
consumers to exercise greater control
regarding the type and amount of
marketing solicitations they receive. The
Act contains a number of provisions
intended to combat consumer fraud and
related crimes, including identity theft,
and to assist its victims. Finally, the Act
requires that a number of studies be
conducted on credit reporting and
related issues.
Section 215 of the FACT Act requires
the FTC and the Board, in consultation
with the Office of Fair Housing and
Equal Opportunity of the Department of
Housing and Urban Development, to
conduct a study on the effects of credit
scores and credit-based insurance scores
on the availability and affordability of
financial products. These products
include mortgages, auto loans, credit
cards, and property and casualty
insurance. Section 215 further requires
the FTC and the Board to study: (1) ‘‘the
statistical relationship, utilizing a
multivariate analysis that controls for
prohibited factors under the Equal
Credit Opportunity Act and other
known risk factors, between credit
scores and credit-based insurance scores
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:34 Feb 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
and the quantifiable risks and actual
losses;’’ and (2) ‘‘the extent to which, if
any, the use of credit scoring models,
credit scores, and credit-based
insurance scores impact on the
availability and affordability of credit to
the extent information is currently
available or is available through proxies,
by geography, income, ethnicity, race,
color, religion, national origin, age, sex,
marital status, and creed, including the
extent to which the consideration or
lack of consideration of certain factors
by credit scoring systems could result in
negative or differential treatment of the
protected classes, under the Equal
Credit Opportunity Act, and the extent
to which, if any, the use of underwriting
systems relying on these models could
achieve comparable results through the
use of factors with less negative
impact.’’
The study is due on December 4,
2005.
II. Request for Comments
The Act requires the FTC to seek
public input about ‘‘the prescribed
methodology and research design of the
study.’’ As part of its efforts to fulfill its
obligations under the Act, the FTC, (in
a Federal Register notice dated June 18,
2004, see 69 FR 34167) sought public
comment on methodological aspects of
the study. The FTC received comments
in response to that notice, and the FTC
and the Board are considering them as
they conduct the study. In the present
request, the FTC seeks comment on
specific studies, data, or other evidence
that might be useful for the study.
Although we enumerate a set of
questions below, we encourage
commenters to provide information on
any aspects of credit scores, credit-based
insurance scores, and the effects of
scores on the relevant markets that
would be useful to the study. In
particular, the FTC seeks information
that bears on the following questions:
A. Credit Scores and Credit:
1. Specifically, how are credit scoring
models developed? Who develops credit
scoring models? What data and
methodologies are used to develop
credit scoring models? What factors are
used in credit scoring models? Why are
those factors used? What other factors
have been considered for use in credit
scoring models, but are not used? Why
are those other factors not used? Are
there benefits or disadvantages, either to
creditors or consumers, from the use of
particular factors by credit scoring
models?
2. How many different credit scoring
models are in use today? What different
types of general purpose or specialized
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9653
credit scoring models are available?
Who offers credit scores?
3. How are credit scores used? Who
uses credit scores, and how widely are
they used? How do they fit into the
underwriting process for mortgages,
auto loans, credit cares, and other credit
products? For what purposes are credit
scores used, other than the initial
underwriting or pricing decision?
4. How has the use of credit scores
changed over time? When were the first
used for each type of financial product
(credit cards, mortgages, auto loans,
etc.)? How has their use expanded to
encompass different groups of
borrowers (e.g., lower income
borrowers, urban/rural borrowers,
borrowers with poor credit histories,
borrowers with non-traditional credit
histories)? If the use of credit scores has
expanded to encompass different groups
of borrowers, how has this affected the
price or availability of credit to those
borrowers?
5. Has the use of credit scores affected
the price and availability of mortgages,
auto loans, credit cards, or other credit
products? If so, are there estimates of
the type and size of such changes? Have
some groups of consumers experienced
cost reduction while others have
experienced cost increases? Have some
groups of consumers experienced
greater access to credit while others
have experienced reduced access?
6. Has the use of credit scores affected
the amount of credit made available to
consumers? Has it affected initial loansto-value ratios at which auto loans or
mortgages (first- or second-lien) are
originated to different groups of
borrowers? Has it affected credit limits
on credit cards and home equity lines of
credit for different groups of borrowers?
7. How has the use of credit scores
affected the costs of underwriting and/
or the time needed to underwrite?
8. What impact has the use of credit
scores had on the accuracy of
underwriting decisions? What impact
has the use of credit scores had on the
share of applicants that are approved for
mortgages, auto loans, credit cards, or
other credit products? What impact has
the use of credit scores had on the
default rates of mortgages, auto loans,
credit cards, or other credit products?
Have the sizes of such changes or effects
been estimated and reported?
9. Has the use of credit scores affected
the cost and availability of credit to
consumers with poor credit histories? If
so, how? What effect has it had on the
use of credit by consumers with poor
credit histories?
10. How has the use of credit scores
affected the cost and availability of
credit to consumers with no credit
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
9654
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 38 / Monday, February 28, 2005 / Notices
history? What effect has it had on the
use of credit by consumers with no
credit history?
11. How has the use of credit scores
affected refinancing behavior for
mortgage, auto, or student loans? How
has it affected the average life of
revolving lines of credit (including
credit cards)?
12. Has the use of credit scores and
credit scoring models impacted the
availability or cost of credit to
consumers by geography, income,
ethnicity, race, color, religion, national
origin, age, sex, marital status, or creed?
If so, how has it impacted each such
category? What are the estimated sizes
of any such changes for each of the
above categories?
13. To what extent does consideration
or lack of consideration of certain
factors by credit scoring systems result
in negative or differential treatment of
those categories of consumers who are
protected under the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act (‘‘ECOA’’) (e.g., race,
color, religion, national origin, sex, age,
and marital status)?
14. To what extent, if any, could the
use of underwriting systems that rely on
scoring models achieve comparable
results through the use of factors with
less negative impact on those categories
of consumers who are protected under
ECOA?
15. What steps, if any, do score
developers, lenders, or other users of
credit scores take to ensure that the use
of credit scores does not result in
negative or differential treatment of
protected categories of consumers under
the ECOA? Have score developers,
lenders, or other users of credit scores
changed the way credit scores are
developed or used in order to avoid
negative of differential treatment of
protected categories of consumers under
the ECOA? Are any particular credit
history factors not used because of
actual or potential negative or
differential treatment of protected
categories of consumers under the
ECOA? If so, what are they?
16. Has the use of credit scores caused
a change in the rate of home ownership?
What is the estimated size of such a
change?
17. Has the use of credit scores caused
a change in the method and amount of
pre-screening consumers for credit
offers? What effects has this had on the
terms offered to consumers?
18. What specific role do credit scores
play in granting ‘‘instant credit?’’ What
impact have credit scores had on the
availability and use of instant credit?
19. How has the use of credit scores
affected companies’ ability to enter new
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:34 Feb 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
lines of business or expand activities in
the various credit industries?
20. What role does credit scoring play
in secondary market activities? In what
ways has the availability of credit scores
affected the development of the
secondary market for credit products?
Has the use of credit scoring increased
or decreased creditors’ access to capital?
In what ways?
21. How are credit scores used to
manage existing credit accounts, such as
credit card accounts? How has the use
of credit scores affected the way credit
accounts are managed? How are credit
scores used in the servicing of
mortgages, and how has the use of credit
scores affected the way mortgages are
serviced?
22. How are records of inquiries used
by credit scoring systems? Does concern
about the possible effects on their credit
scores affect consumers’ credit-shopping
behavior? If so, what impact does this
have on the consumers or on
competition in the various credit
markets?
23. How does the use of credit scores
affect consumers with inaccurate
information on their credit reports? How
does the use of credit scores affect
consumers who have been the victims of
identity theft?
24. Are there particular forms of
inaccuracy or incompleteness in the
credit reporting system, such as
incomplete reporting by creditors, that
affect either the usefulness of credit
scores to lenders or the benefits or
disadvantages of scoring to consumers?
What are those types of inaccuracies or
incompleteness? How do they affect the
usefulness of credit scores to lenders or
the benefits or disadvantages of scoring
to consumers?
B. Credit-Based Insurance and Property
and Casualty Insurance
1. Specifically, how are credit-based
insurance scoring models developed?
Who develops credit-based insurance
scoring models? What data and
methodologies are used to develop
credit-based insurance scoring models?
What factors are used in credit-based
insurance scoring models? Why are
those factors used? What other factors
have been considered for use in creditbased insurance scoring models, but are
not used? Why are those other factors
not used? Are there benefits or
disadvantages, either to insurers or
consumers, from the use of particular
factors by credit-based insurance
scoring models?
2. How many different credit-based
insurance scoring models are in use
today? Who offers credit-based
insurance scores?
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. How are credit-based insurance
scores used? Who uses credit-based
insurance scores, and how widely are
they used? How do they fit into the
underwriting and rating process for
automobile and homeowners insurance?
4. Has the use of credit-based
insurance scores affected the price and
availability of automobile and
homeowners insurance? We are
especially interested in evidence
containing estimates of the size of such
changes. Have some groups of
consumers experienced cost reductions
while others have experienced cost
increases? If so, which consumers have
experienced reductions and which have
experienced increases, and what are the
magnitudes of those changes? Have
some consumers experienced dramatic
increases in their insurance premiums,
solely as the result of the introduction
of credit-based insurance scoring? If so,
what has been the impact of this rise in
premiums on these consumers?
5. How has the use of credit-based
insurance scores affected the costs of
underwriting and rating and/or the time
needed to underwrite and rate?
6. How has the use of credit-based
insurance scores affected the accuracy
of underwriting and rating decisions?
Have the sizes of such changes been
estimated and reported?
7. Has the use of credit-based
insurance scores affected the amount of
automobile or homeowners insurance
purchased by consumers? Has it affected
the limits or deductibles that consumers
select when purchasing automobile or
homeowners insurance? Has it affected
the number of drivers who drive
without insurance? Has it affected the
number of homeowners that have no
homeowners insurance? What are the
estimated sizes of such changes?
8. How has the use of credit-based
insurance scores affected the cost and
availability of automobile or
homeowners insurance to consumers
with poor credit histories? What effect
has it had on the purchasing of
automobile or homeowners insurance
by consumers with poor credit
histories?
9. Has the use of credit-based
insurance scores affected the cost and
availability of automobile or
homeowners insurance to consumers
with no credit history? If so, how? What
effect has it had on the purchasing of
automobile or homeowners insurance
by consumers with no credit histories?
10. How has the use of credit-based
insurance scores impacted the
availability of cost of insurance to
consumers by geography, income,
ethnicity, race, color, religion, national
origin, age, sex, marital status, or creed?
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 38 / Monday, February 28, 2005 / Notices
What are the estimated sizes of such
changes for each of the above
categories?
11. To what extent does consideration
or lack of consideration of certain
factors by credit-based insurance
scoring systems result in negative or
differential treatment of protected
classes of consumers, that is, the same
categories of consumers against whom
discrimination is prohibited under the
ECOA (e.g. race, color, religion, national
origin, sex, age, and marital status)?
12. To what extent, if any, could the
use of underwriting systems relying on
credit-based insurance scoring models
achieve comparable results through the
use of factors with less negative impact
on consumer sin the ECOA protected
categories?
13. What steps, if any, do score
developers or insurance companies take
to ensure that the use of credit-based
insurance scores does not result in
negative or differential treatment of
protected categories of consumers listed
in the ECOA? Are any particular credit
history factors not used because of
actual or potential negative or
differential treatment of protected
categories of consumers listed in the
ECOA? If so, what are they?
14. Has the use of credit-based
insurance scores caused a change in the
method and amount of pre-screening
consumers for insurance offers? What
effects has this had on the terms offered
to consumers?
15. How has the use of credit-based
insurance scores affected companies’
ability to enter new lines of the
automobile or homeowners insurance
business?
16. If the use of credit-based
insurance scores has affected the costs
individual consumers pay for insurance,
has it (i) caused a change in the overall
average cost of insurance for
consumers?; (ii) changed the
distribution of individual costs?; or (iii)
caused any other change in the costs to
consumers? What are the magnitudes of
any such changes?
17. Would an analysis of the share or
number of consumers that purchase
automobile or homeowners insurance
from ‘‘involuntary,’’ ‘‘pooled risk,’’
‘‘assigned risk,’’ or other types of
insurance other than insurance offered
on a voluntary basis by private insurers,
be informative about the price and/or
availability of automobile or
homeowners insurance? Would an
analysis of the share of drivers that
drive without automobile insurance be
informative about the price and/or
availability of automobile insurance?
18. What impact, if any, does banning
or limiting the use of particular
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:34 Feb 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
underwriting or rating factors, such as
gender, territory, or credit-based
insurance score, have on the price or
availability of automobile or
homeowners insurance? Has the
prohibition on the use of credit-based
scores for insurance in particular states
had any impact on the price or
availability of automobile or
homeowners insurance for consumers in
those states? If so, what has that impact
been? If the use of credit-based
insurance scores was not allowed in
additional states, what impact would
this have on the price or availability of
automotive or homeowners insurance?
Are there, or would there be, any
specific effects on those insurance
consumers who are within protected
categories listed in the ECOA?
19. How are records of inquiries used
by credit-based insurance scoring
systems? Does concern about the
possible effects on their credit-based
insurance scores affect consumers’
insurance-shopping behavior? If so,
what impact does this have on
competition in the insurance markets?
20. How does the use of credit-based
insurance scores affect consumers with
inaccurate information on their credit
reports? How does the use of creditbased insurance scores affect consumers
who have been the victims of identity
theft?
21. Are there particular forms of
inaccuracy or incompleteness in the
credit reporting system, such as
incomplete reporting by creditors, that
affect either the usefulness of creditbased insurance scores to insurers or the
benefits or disadvantages of scoring to
consumers? What are those types of
inaccuracies or incompleteness? How
do they affect the usefulness of creditbased insurance scores to insurers or the
benefits or disadvantages of scoring to
consumers?
Authority: Sec. 112(b), Pub. L. 108–159,
117 Stat. 1956 (15 U.S.C. 1681c–1).
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–3781 Filed 2–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–M
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
Federal Travel Regulation (FTR)
[FTR 2005-N1]
eTravel Initiative
Office of Governmentwide
Policy (MTT), General Services
Administration (GSA).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
9655
Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice provides
information to Federal agencies subject
to the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR)
that did not award a task order to an
eTravel Service (eTS) vendor by
December 31, 2004. This notice
provides guidance to assist those
agencies with this FTR requirement.
DATES: This change is effective February
28, 2005 and expires when all agencies
have fully migrated to the new eTravel
service.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Tim Burke, Office of Governmentwide
Policy (MTT), General Services
Administration, 1800 F Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20405, by phone at
703-872-8611, or by e-mail at
timothy.burke@gsa.gov.
Federal
Travel Regulation sections 301–73.2 and
301–73.100 require that all agencies
subject to the FTR (with the exception
of the Department of Defense (DoD) for
its civilian employees and the
Government of the District of Columbia)
award a task order to an eTravel Service
(eTS) vendor no later than December 31,
2004, and fully migrate to eTS agencywide no later than September 30, 2006.
The General Services Administration
(GSA) extends its appreciation to all
agencies that successfully met the
December 31st eTS vendor award
requirement. We are reaching out
through this notice, however,
specifically to those agencies that for a
variety of reasons were unable to meet
the requirement and offering our
assistance to bring you into compliance
with the FTR.
Each agency that encountered a delay
with its eTS acquisition and has not yet
implemented eTS as required under the
FTR must submit a request for an
exception to the Administrator of
General Services, 1800 F Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20405, for
consideration of approval. The request
must include a complete justification
outlining why you need an extension
and the date when your agency will
award a task order or will agree to be
cross–serviced by a franchise
organization. Please submit your request
and supporting information no later
than March 30, 2005.
To ensure compliance with the
requirement to completely migrate to
eTS by September 30, 2006, all agencies
subject to the FTR (with the exception
of DoD for its civilian employees and
the Government of the District of
Columbia as referenced above) should
target full migration to eTS no later than
June 30, 2006. GSA is committed to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 38 (Monday, February 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9652-9655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-3781]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
RIN [3084-AA94]
Public Comment on Data, Studies, or Other Evidence Related to the
Effects of Credit Scores and Credit-Based Insurance Scores on the
Availability and Affordability of Financial Products
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (``FACT
Act'') or ``Act'') requires the Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or
``Commission'') and the Federal Reserve Board (``Board'') to conduct a
study on the effects of credit scores and credit-based insurance scores
on the availability and affordability of financial products. These
products include credit cards, mortgages, auto loans, and property and
casualty insurance. As part of its efforts to fulfill its obligations
under the Act, the FTC seeks public comment on any evidence the FTC and
the Board should consider in conducting the study.
DATES: Comments must be received by April 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Public comments are invited, and may be filed with the
Commission in either paper or electronic form. Comments filed in paper
form should refer to ``FACT Act Scores Study'' both in the text and on
the envelope, to facilitate their organization, and should be mailed or
delivered to: Federal Trade Commission/Office of the Secretary, Room H-
159 (Annex Z), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580. The
FTC requests that any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or
overnight service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the
Washington area and at the Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security precautions.
Comments may be filed in electronic form by clicking on the
following: https://score.commentworks.com/FTCCreditScoreStudy/ and
following the instructions on the web-based form. If a comment contains
confidential information, it must be filed in paper (rather than
electronic) form, and the first page of the document must be clearly
labeled ``Confidential.'' \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Commission Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The comment must also
be accompanied by an explicit request for confidential treatment,
including the factual and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from
the public record. The request will be granted or denied by the
Commission's General Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the
public interest. See Commission Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure that the Commission considers an electronic comment, you
must file it on web-based form at https://secure.commentworks.com/
FTTCreditScoreStudy/. You also may visit https://www.regulations.gov to
read this Notice, and may file an electronic comment through that
website. The
[[Page 9653]]
Commission will consider all comments that regulations.gov forwards to
it.
The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. All timely and responsive public comments, whether filed
in paper or electronic form, will be considered by the Commission, and
will be available to the public on the FTC Web site, to the extent
practicable, at https://www.ftc.gov. As a matter of discretion, the FTC
makes every effort to remove home contact information for individuals
from the public comments it receives before placing those comments on
the FTC Web site. More information, including routine uses permitted by
the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's privacy policy, at https://
www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jesse Leary, Deputy Assistant
Director, (202) 326-326-3480, Division of Consumer Protection, Bureau
of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FACT Act was signed into law on December 4, 2005. Fair and
Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, Pub. L. No. 108-159 (2003).
In general, the Act amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act (``FCRA'') to
enhance the accuracy of consumer reports and to allow consumers to
exercise greater control regarding the type and amount of marketing
solicitations they receive. The Act contains a number of provisions
intended to combat consumer fraud and related crimes, including
identity theft, and to assist its victims. Finally, the Act requires
that a number of studies be conducted on credit reporting and related
issues.
Section 215 of the FACT Act requires the FTC and the Board, in
consultation with the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity of
the Department of Housing and Urban Development, to conduct a study on
the effects of credit scores and credit-based insurance scores on the
availability and affordability of financial products. These products
include mortgages, auto loans, credit cards, and property and casualty
insurance. Section 215 further requires the FTC and the Board to study:
(1) ``the statistical relationship, utilizing a multivariate analysis
that controls for prohibited factors under the Equal Credit Opportunity
Act and other known risk factors, between credit scores and credit-
based insurance scores and the quantifiable risks and actual losses;''
and (2) ``the extent to which, if any, the use of credit scoring
models, credit scores, and credit-based insurance scores impact on the
availability and affordability of credit to the extent information is
currently available or is available through proxies, by geography,
income, ethnicity, race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex,
marital status, and creed, including the extent to which the
consideration or lack of consideration of certain factors by credit
scoring systems could result in negative or differential treatment of
the protected classes, under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the
extent to which, if any, the use of underwriting systems relying on
these models could achieve comparable results through the use of
factors with less negative impact.''
The study is due on December 4, 2005.
II. Request for Comments
The Act requires the FTC to seek public input about ``the
prescribed methodology and research design of the study.'' As part of
its efforts to fulfill its obligations under the Act, the FTC, (in a
Federal Register notice dated June 18, 2004, see 69 FR 34167) sought
public comment on methodological aspects of the study. The FTC received
comments in response to that notice, and the FTC and the Board are
considering them as they conduct the study. In the present request, the
FTC seeks comment on specific studies, data, or other evidence that
might be useful for the study. Although we enumerate a set of questions
below, we encourage commenters to provide information on any aspects of
credit scores, credit-based insurance scores, and the effects of scores
on the relevant markets that would be useful to the study. In
particular, the FTC seeks information that bears on the following
questions:
A. Credit Scores and Credit:
1. Specifically, how are credit scoring models developed? Who
develops credit scoring models? What data and methodologies are used to
develop credit scoring models? What factors are used in credit scoring
models? Why are those factors used? What other factors have been
considered for use in credit scoring models, but are not used? Why are
those other factors not used? Are there benefits or disadvantages,
either to creditors or consumers, from the use of particular factors by
credit scoring models?
2. How many different credit scoring models are in use today? What
different types of general purpose or specialized credit scoring models
are available? Who offers credit scores?
3. How are credit scores used? Who uses credit scores, and how
widely are they used? How do they fit into the underwriting process for
mortgages, auto loans, credit cares, and other credit products? For
what purposes are credit scores used, other than the initial
underwriting or pricing decision?
4. How has the use of credit scores changed over time? When were
the first used for each type of financial product (credit cards,
mortgages, auto loans, etc.)? How has their use expanded to encompass
different groups of borrowers (e.g., lower income borrowers, urban/
rural borrowers, borrowers with poor credit histories, borrowers with
non-traditional credit histories)? If the use of credit scores has
expanded to encompass different groups of borrowers, how has this
affected the price or availability of credit to those borrowers?
5. Has the use of credit scores affected the price and availability
of mortgages, auto loans, credit cards, or other credit products? If
so, are there estimates of the type and size of such changes? Have some
groups of consumers experienced cost reduction while others have
experienced cost increases? Have some groups of consumers experienced
greater access to credit while others have experienced reduced access?
6. Has the use of credit scores affected the amount of credit made
available to consumers? Has it affected initial loans-to-value ratios
at which auto loans or mortgages (first- or second-lien) are originated
to different groups of borrowers? Has it affected credit limits on
credit cards and home equity lines of credit for different groups of
borrowers?
7. How has the use of credit scores affected the costs of
underwriting and/or the time needed to underwrite?
8. What impact has the use of credit scores had on the accuracy of
underwriting decisions? What impact has the use of credit scores had on
the share of applicants that are approved for mortgages, auto loans,
credit cards, or other credit products? What impact has the use of
credit scores had on the default rates of mortgages, auto loans, credit
cards, or other credit products? Have the sizes of such changes or
effects been estimated and reported?
9. Has the use of credit scores affected the cost and availability
of credit to consumers with poor credit histories? If so, how? What
effect has it had on the use of credit by consumers with poor credit
histories?
10. How has the use of credit scores affected the cost and
availability of credit to consumers with no credit
[[Page 9654]]
history? What effect has it had on the use of credit by consumers with
no credit history?
11. How has the use of credit scores affected refinancing behavior
for mortgage, auto, or student loans? How has it affected the average
life of revolving lines of credit (including credit cards)?
12. Has the use of credit scores and credit scoring models impacted
the availability or cost of credit to consumers by geography, income,
ethnicity, race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, marital
status, or creed? If so, how has it impacted each such category? What
are the estimated sizes of any such changes for each of the above
categories?
13. To what extent does consideration or lack of consideration of
certain factors by credit scoring systems result in negative or
differential treatment of those categories of consumers who are
protected under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (``ECOA'') (e.g.,
race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, and marital status)?
14. To what extent, if any, could the use of underwriting systems
that rely on scoring models achieve comparable results through the use
of factors with less negative impact on those categories of consumers
who are protected under ECOA?
15. What steps, if any, do score developers, lenders, or other
users of credit scores take to ensure that the use of credit scores
does not result in negative or differential treatment of protected
categories of consumers under the ECOA? Have score developers, lenders,
or other users of credit scores changed the way credit scores are
developed or used in order to avoid negative of differential treatment
of protected categories of consumers under the ECOA? Are any particular
credit history factors not used because of actual or potential negative
or differential treatment of protected categories of consumers under
the ECOA? If so, what are they?
16. Has the use of credit scores caused a change in the rate of
home ownership? What is the estimated size of such a change?
17. Has the use of credit scores caused a change in the method and
amount of pre-screening consumers for credit offers? What effects has
this had on the terms offered to consumers?
18. What specific role do credit scores play in granting ``instant
credit?'' What impact have credit scores had on the availability and
use of instant credit?
19. How has the use of credit scores affected companies' ability to
enter new lines of business or expand activities in the various credit
industries?
20. What role does credit scoring play in secondary market
activities? In what ways has the availability of credit scores affected
the development of the secondary market for credit products? Has the
use of credit scoring increased or decreased creditors' access to
capital? In what ways?
21. How are credit scores used to manage existing credit accounts,
such as credit card accounts? How has the use of credit scores affected
the way credit accounts are managed? How are credit scores used in the
servicing of mortgages, and how has the use of credit scores affected
the way mortgages are serviced?
22. How are records of inquiries used by credit scoring systems?
Does concern about the possible effects on their credit scores affect
consumers' credit-shopping behavior? If so, what impact does this have
on the consumers or on competition in the various credit markets?
23. How does the use of credit scores affect consumers with
inaccurate information on their credit reports? How does the use of
credit scores affect consumers who have been the victims of identity
theft?
24. Are there particular forms of inaccuracy or incompleteness in
the credit reporting system, such as incomplete reporting by creditors,
that affect either the usefulness of credit scores to lenders or the
benefits or disadvantages of scoring to consumers? What are those types
of inaccuracies or incompleteness? How do they affect the usefulness of
credit scores to lenders or the benefits or disadvantages of scoring to
consumers?
B. Credit-Based Insurance and Property and Casualty Insurance
1. Specifically, how are credit-based insurance scoring models
developed? Who develops credit-based insurance scoring models? What
data and methodologies are used to develop credit-based insurance
scoring models? What factors are used in credit-based insurance scoring
models? Why are those factors used? What other factors have been
considered for use in credit-based insurance scoring models, but are
not used? Why are those other factors not used? Are there benefits or
disadvantages, either to insurers or consumers, from the use of
particular factors by credit-based insurance scoring models?
2. How many different credit-based insurance scoring models are in
use today? Who offers credit-based insurance scores?
3. How are credit-based insurance scores used? Who uses credit-
based insurance scores, and how widely are they used? How do they fit
into the underwriting and rating process for automobile and homeowners
insurance?
4. Has the use of credit-based insurance scores affected the price
and availability of automobile and homeowners insurance? We are
especially interested in evidence containing estimates of the size of
such changes. Have some groups of consumers experienced cost reductions
while others have experienced cost increases? If so, which consumers
have experienced reductions and which have experienced increases, and
what are the magnitudes of those changes? Have some consumers
experienced dramatic increases in their insurance premiums, solely as
the result of the introduction of credit-based insurance scoring? If
so, what has been the impact of this rise in premiums on these
consumers?
5. How has the use of credit-based insurance scores affected the
costs of underwriting and rating and/or the time needed to underwrite
and rate?
6. How has the use of credit-based insurance scores affected the
accuracy of underwriting and rating decisions? Have the sizes of such
changes been estimated and reported?
7. Has the use of credit-based insurance scores affected the amount
of automobile or homeowners insurance purchased by consumers? Has it
affected the limits or deductibles that consumers select when
purchasing automobile or homeowners insurance? Has it affected the
number of drivers who drive without insurance? Has it affected the
number of homeowners that have no homeowners insurance? What are the
estimated sizes of such changes?
8. How has the use of credit-based insurance scores affected the
cost and availability of automobile or homeowners insurance to
consumers with poor credit histories? What effect has it had on the
purchasing of automobile or homeowners insurance by consumers with poor
credit histories?
9. Has the use of credit-based insurance scores affected the cost
and availability of automobile or homeowners insurance to consumers
with no credit history? If so, how? What effect has it had on the
purchasing of automobile or homeowners insurance by consumers with no
credit histories?
10. How has the use of credit-based insurance scores impacted the
availability of cost of insurance to consumers by geography, income,
ethnicity, race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, marital
status, or creed?
[[Page 9655]]
What are the estimated sizes of such changes for each of the above
categories?
11. To what extent does consideration or lack of consideration of
certain factors by credit-based insurance scoring systems result in
negative or differential treatment of protected classes of consumers,
that is, the same categories of consumers against whom discrimination
is prohibited under the ECOA (e.g. race, color, religion, national
origin, sex, age, and marital status)?
12. To what extent, if any, could the use of underwriting systems
relying on credit-based insurance scoring models achieve comparable
results through the use of factors with less negative impact on
consumer sin the ECOA protected categories?
13. What steps, if any, do score developers or insurance companies
take to ensure that the use of credit-based insurance scores does not
result in negative or differential treatment of protected categories of
consumers listed in the ECOA? Are any particular credit history factors
not used because of actual or potential negative or differential
treatment of protected categories of consumers listed in the ECOA? If
so, what are they?
14. Has the use of credit-based insurance scores caused a change in
the method and amount of pre-screening consumers for insurance offers?
What effects has this had on the terms offered to consumers?
15. How has the use of credit-based insurance scores affected
companies' ability to enter new lines of the automobile or homeowners
insurance business?
16. If the use of credit-based insurance scores has affected the
costs individual consumers pay for insurance, has it (i) caused a
change in the overall average cost of insurance for consumers?; (ii)
changed the distribution of individual costs?; or (iii) caused any
other change in the costs to consumers? What are the magnitudes of any
such changes?
17. Would an analysis of the share or number of consumers that
purchase automobile or homeowners insurance from ``involuntary,''
``pooled risk,'' ``assigned risk,'' or other types of insurance other
than insurance offered on a voluntary basis by private insurers, be
informative about the price and/or availability of automobile or
homeowners insurance? Would an analysis of the share of drivers that
drive without automobile insurance be informative about the price and/
or availability of automobile insurance?
18. What impact, if any, does banning or limiting the use of
particular underwriting or rating factors, such as gender, territory,
or credit-based insurance score, have on the price or availability of
automobile or homeowners insurance? Has the prohibition on the use of
credit-based scores for insurance in particular states had any impact
on the price or availability of automobile or homeowners insurance for
consumers in those states? If so, what has that impact been? If the use
of credit-based insurance scores was not allowed in additional states,
what impact would this have on the price or availability of automotive
or homeowners insurance? Are there, or would there be, any specific
effects on those insurance consumers who are within protected
categories listed in the ECOA?
19. How are records of inquiries used by credit-based insurance
scoring systems? Does concern about the possible effects on their
credit-based insurance scores affect consumers' insurance-shopping
behavior? If so, what impact does this have on competition in the
insurance markets?
20. How does the use of credit-based insurance scores affect
consumers with inaccurate information on their credit reports? How does
the use of credit-based insurance scores affect consumers who have been
the victims of identity theft?
21. Are there particular forms of inaccuracy or incompleteness in
the credit reporting system, such as incomplete reporting by creditors,
that affect either the usefulness of credit-based insurance scores to
insurers or the benefits or disadvantages of scoring to consumers? What
are those types of inaccuracies or incompleteness? How do they affect
the usefulness of credit-based insurance scores to insurers or the
benefits or disadvantages of scoring to consumers?
Authority: Sec. 112(b), Pub. L. 108-159, 117 Stat. 1956 (15
U.S.C. 1681c-1).
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-3781 Filed 2-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M