Information Collection; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 9616-9617 [05-3716]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
9616
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 38 / Monday, February 28, 2005 / Notices
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations are satisfied, and
that approval of the application is in the
public interest;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
grants authority for subzone status at the
tool, fastener, and home product
warehousing/distribution facility of
Black & Decker Corporation, located in
Fort Mill, South Carolina (Subzone
38E), at the location described in the
application, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
§ 400.28.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of
February, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Import Administration, Alternate Chairman,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
(Outokumpu) as an affiliate of Walsin.
On October 22, 2004, the Department
initiated an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel wire rod from Taiwan for the
period September 1, 2003, through
August 31, 2004, and published a notice
in the Federal Register. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 69 FR 62022
(October 22, 2004). On November 4,
2004, Carpenter informed the
Department that in that mis-identified
Outokumpu on November 12, 2004. On
December 23, 2004, Carpenter withdrew
its request for an administrative review
of Walsin.
Dated: February 18, 2005.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–3835 Filed 2–25–05; 8:45 am]
Rescission of Review
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National
and Community Service (hereinafter the
‘‘Corporation’’) has submitted a public
information collection request (ICR)
entitled Senior Corps Grant Application,
formerly National Senior Service Corps
Grant Application to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Pub. L. 104–13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Copies of this ICR, with applicable
supporting documentation, may be
obtained by calling the Corporation for
National and Community Service, Ms.
Angela Roberts, at (202) 606–5000,
extension 111. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TTY/TDD) may call (202) 606–5256
between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.
eastern time, Monday through Friday.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, to the
Office of information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: Ms. Katherine Astrich,
OMB Desk Officer for the Corporation
for National and Community Service, by
any of the following two methods listed
in the address section, within 30 days
from the date of publication in this
Federal Register.
(1) By fax to: (202) 395–6974,
Attention: Ms. Katherine Astrich, OMB
Desk Officer for the Corporation for
National and Community Service; and
(2) Electronically by e-mail to:
Katherine_T._Astrich@omb.eop.gov.
Supplementary Information: The
OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Corporation, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
Corporation’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information,
International Trade Administration
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review if a party that
requested the review withdraws its
request within 90 days of the
publication date of the notice of
initiation thereof. Because Carpenter
withdrew its review request within the
90-day time limit, the Department is
rescinding this review and will issue
appropriate assessment instructions
directly to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection within 15 days of publication
of this notice.
[A–583–828]
Notification to Importers
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Taiwan:
Notice of Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility, under
19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–3811 Filed 2–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: February 23,
2005.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Malcolm A. Burke or Howard Smith at
(202) 482–3584 or (202) 482–5193,
respectively; AD/CVD Operations,
Office 4, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 30, 2004, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) received a timely request
from Carpenter Technology Corporation
(Carpenter), the sole petitioner in the
instant proceeding, to conduct an
administrative review of sales made by
Walsin Lihwa Corporation (Walsin) and
any of its affiliated parties. In that
request, Carpenter specifically
identified Outokumpu Stainless
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:34 Feb 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4)
and section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Information Collection; Submission for
OMB Review; Comment Request
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 38 / Monday, February 28, 2005 / Notices
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Propose ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Propose ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
Comments
A 60-day public comment Notice was
published in the Federal Register on
December 5, 2004. The summary of
comments received is as follows: A total
of 17 written responses were received
that represented a total of 39
individuals. One letter was written on
behalf of an Association including the
collective comments of 23 individuals.
Each written response contained
numerous separate comments or
statements. In summary:
(a) Two comments were received
about adding the DUNS number to Part
I—Application Facesheet. The
Corporation agrees and will do so.
(b) Two comments requested that the
questions contained in both the Part
III—Narrative and Part IV—Work Plans
be clarified and contain more detail.
The revised application includes these
changes.
(c) Five comments were received
about Part II—Budget, of which 3 were
incorporated. The three reflected in the
revised information collection are to
clarify the types of items to enter on
each budget line item; to provide clearer
instruction; and to more thoroughly
define the category on the budget form
called ‘‘xcess.’’ Two comments were not
included: A request to update formulas
in a spreadsheet template, because the
spreadsheet is no longer used; and a
request to list the types of required
documentation needed to respond to an
audit. This last request is beyond the
scope of the grant application’s purpose.
The information requested by the
respondent can be found in Program
Regulations.
(d) Two commenters thought the
estimated burden was too low. The
Corporation believes that burden
estimate is adequate, particularly with
upcoming improvements to the eGrants
system, and has retained the original
annualized time estimates.
(e) There was one comment each
about the Volunteer Station Roster,
requesting a standard user-friendly
format; and one comment about sorting
the list of Service Categories in the grant
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:34 Feb 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
application in the same order as is used
in the Progress Report. Both suggestions
were incorporated.
(f) From a total of 9 general
comments, 7 were beyond the scope of
this information collection. Comments
included two pleas to provide more
federal funds to grantees; a request to
change the method used to capture
outcomes and outcome-based
programming; a request to standardize
at least one programmatic outcome for
all RSVP grantees nationwide; one
request to restrict the number of new
data elements as much as possible. One
general comment addressed the
Corporation’s ongoing system of
‘‘grading’’ its grantees on outcomes,
which is factually incorrect, as the
Corporation does not grade its grantees
in this manner. Another comment asked
the Corporation to lower the age and
income eligibility for its Foster
Grandparent and Senior Companion
Programs, which was established and
can only be changed through a
legislative change. Two general
comments asked for copies of the
revised application package, which
were provided.
(g) The 43 remaining comments,
comprising the majority of all
comments, requested changes to the
Corporation’s electronic grants
management system, eGrants. While
beyond the scope of this information
collection, Senior Corps will share these
comments with the Corporation’s
eGrants team. Also, Senior Corps will
prepare an update for its grantees about
the soon-to-debut version of eGrants
Phase II, including the problems
reported by the public that it will solve.
Description: The Corporation is
seeking approval of the Senior Corps
Grant Application which is used by
current and prospective grantees to
apply for sponsorship of projects under
the Retired and Senior Volunteer
Program (RSVP); the Foster Grandparent
Program (FGP); the Senior Companion
Program (SCP); the Senior
Demonstration Program (SDP); and the
Special Volunteer Program—Homeland
Security (SVP). Completion of the Grant
Application is required to be considered
for sponsorship and the receipt of
associated federal funds and benefits.
Changes proposed include:
• Additional instructions to clarify
budget, narrative, work plan, and
performance measures sections;
• Updated the list of Service
Categories used by applicants to identify
the types of needs the national service
participants meet;
• Use of a standard format for the
supplemental Station Roster that is both
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9617
user-friendly and that collects
consistent information.
• New fields adopted by the
eGovernment Initiative, including the
required DUNS number; and
• Accurate correlation to the flow and
references contained in the
Corporation’s electronic grants
management system, eGrants, that is
used by its grantees.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Agency: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
Title: Senior Corps Grant Application.
OMB Number: 3045–0035.
Agency Number: CNCS Form 424–
NSSC.
Affected Public: Sponsors of National
Senior Service Corps (Senior Corps)
grants.
Total Respondents: 1,317.
Frequency: Annual.
Average Time Per Respondent: 13.5
for current grantees, and 16.5 for first
time applicants.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
17,121.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): $4,600.
Dated: February 22, 2005.
Tess Scannell,
Director, Senior Corps.
[FR Doc. 05–3716 Filed 2–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050–$$–P
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National
and Community Service (hereinafter the
‘‘Corporation’’), as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to
provide the general public and federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) (44
U.S.C. section 3506(c)(2)(A)). This
program helps to ensure that requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirement on respondents can be
properly assessed.
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 38 (Monday, February 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9616-9617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-3716]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE
Information Collection; Submission for OMB Review; Comment
Request
AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service
(hereinafter the ``Corporation'') has submitted a public information
collection request (ICR) entitled Senior Corps Grant Application,
formerly National Senior Service Corps Grant Application to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). Copies of this ICR, with applicable supporting
documentation, may be obtained by calling the Corporation for National
and Community Service, Ms. Angela Roberts, at (202) 606-5000, extension
111. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TTY/
TDD) may call (202) 606-5256 between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.
eastern time, Monday through Friday.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, to the Office of information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: Ms. Katherine Astrich, OMB Desk Officer for
the Corporation for National and Community Service, by any of the
following two methods listed in the address section, within 30 days
from the date of publication in this Federal Register.
(1) By fax to: (202) 395-6974, Attention: Ms. Katherine Astrich,
OMB Desk Officer for the Corporation for National and Community
Service; and
(2) Electronically by e-mail to: Katherine--T.--
Astrich@omb.eop.gov.
Supplementary Information: The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Corporation, including whether the information will have practical
utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the Corporation's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information,
[[Page 9617]]
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Propose ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
Propose ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submissions of responses.
Comments
A 60-day public comment Notice was published in the Federal
Register on December 5, 2004. The summary of comments received is as
follows: A total of 17 written responses were received that represented
a total of 39 individuals. One letter was written on behalf of an
Association including the collective comments of 23 individuals. Each
written response contained numerous separate comments or statements. In
summary:
(a) Two comments were received about adding the DUNS number to Part
I--Application Facesheet. The Corporation agrees and will do so.
(b) Two comments requested that the questions contained in both the
Part III--Narrative and Part IV--Work Plans be clarified and contain
more detail. The revised application includes these changes.
(c) Five comments were received about Part II--Budget, of which 3
were incorporated. The three reflected in the revised information
collection are to clarify the types of items to enter on each budget
line item; to provide clearer instruction; and to more thoroughly
define the category on the budget form called ``xcess.'' Two comments
were not included: A request to update formulas in a spreadsheet
template, because the spreadsheet is no longer used; and a request to
list the types of required documentation needed to respond to an audit.
This last request is beyond the scope of the grant application's
purpose. The information requested by the respondent can be found in
Program Regulations.
(d) Two commenters thought the estimated burden was too low. The
Corporation believes that burden estimate is adequate, particularly
with upcoming improvements to the eGrants system, and has retained the
original annualized time estimates.
(e) There was one comment each about the Volunteer Station Roster,
requesting a standard user-friendly format; and one comment about
sorting the list of Service Categories in the grant application in the
same order as is used in the Progress Report. Both suggestions were
incorporated.
(f) From a total of 9 general comments, 7 were beyond the scope of
this information collection. Comments included two pleas to provide
more federal funds to grantees; a request to change the method used to
capture outcomes and outcome-based programming; a request to
standardize at least one programmatic outcome for all RSVP grantees
nationwide; one request to restrict the number of new data elements as
much as possible. One general comment addressed the Corporation's
ongoing system of ``grading'' its grantees on outcomes, which is
factually incorrect, as the Corporation does not grade its grantees in
this manner. Another comment asked the Corporation to lower the age and
income eligibility for its Foster Grandparent and Senior Companion
Programs, which was established and can only be changed through a
legislative change. Two general comments asked for copies of the
revised application package, which were provided.
(g) The 43 remaining comments, comprising the majority of all
comments, requested changes to the Corporation's electronic grants
management system, eGrants. While beyond the scope of this information
collection, Senior Corps will share these comments with the
Corporation's eGrants team. Also, Senior Corps will prepare an update
for its grantees about the soon-to-debut version of eGrants Phase II,
including the problems reported by the public that it will solve.
Description: The Corporation is seeking approval of the Senior
Corps Grant Application which is used by current and prospective
grantees to apply for sponsorship of projects under the Retired and
Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP); the Foster Grandparent Program (FGP);
the Senior Companion Program (SCP); the Senior Demonstration Program
(SDP); and the Special Volunteer Program--Homeland Security (SVP).
Completion of the Grant Application is required to be considered for
sponsorship and the receipt of associated federal funds and benefits.
Changes proposed include:
Additional instructions to clarify budget, narrative, work
plan, and performance measures sections;
Updated the list of Service Categories used by applicants
to identify the types of needs the national service participants meet;
Use of a standard format for the supplemental Station
Roster that is both user-friendly and that collects consistent
information.
New fields adopted by the eGovernment Initiative,
including the required DUNS number; and
Accurate correlation to the flow and references contained
in the Corporation's electronic grants management system, eGrants, that
is used by its grantees.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Agency: Corporation for National and Community Service.
Title: Senior Corps Grant Application.
OMB Number: 3045-0035.
Agency Number: CNCS Form 424-NSSC.
Affected Public: Sponsors of National Senior Service Corps (Senior
Corps) grants.
Total Respondents: 1,317.
Frequency: Annual.
Average Time Per Respondent: 13.5 for current grantees, and 16.5
for first time applicants.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 17,121.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/maintenance): $4,600.
Dated: February 22, 2005.
Tess Scannell,
Director, Senior Corps.
[FR Doc. 05-3716 Filed 2-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P
