Liability Pursuant to Section 4062(e) of ERISA, 9258-9260 [05-3702]
Download as PDF
9258
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 37 / Friday, February 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules
at the office of the Regional Air Traffic
Division, Federal Aviation
Administration, Room 550, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark D. Ward, Manager, Airspace and
Operations Branch, Eastern En Route
and Oceanic Service Area, Federal
Aviation Administration, P.O. Box
20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320;
telephone (404) 305–5627.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views
or arguments as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above.
Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this notice must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2005–20235/Airspace
Docket No. 05–ASO–1.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter. All communications
received before the specified closing
date for comments will be considered
before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this
notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerned
with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
Internet at https://dms.dot.gov. Recently
published rulemaking documents can
also be accessed through the FAA’s Web
page at https://www.faa.gov or the
Superintendent of Documents’ Web
page at https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara.
Additionally, any person may obtain a
copy of this notice by submitting a
request to the Federal Aviation
Administration, Office of Air Traffic
Airspace Management, ATA–400, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591, or by calling
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:21 Feb 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
(202) 267–8783. Communications must
identify both docket numbers for this
notice. Persons interested in being
placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM’s should contact the FAA’s
Office of Rulemaking, (202) 267–9677,
to request a copy of Advisory Circular
No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which
describes the application procedure.
The Proposal
The FAA is considering an
amendment to Part 71 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 71) to
amend Class E5 airspace at Parsons, TN.
Class E airspace designations for
airspace areas extending upward from
700 feet or more above the surface of the
earth are published in Paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9M, dated August 30,
2004, and effective September 16, 2004,
which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document
would be published subsequently in the
Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (Air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;
AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING
POINTS
1. The authority citation for Part 71
continues to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9M,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 30, 2004, and
effective September 16, 2004, is
amended as follows: Paragraph 6005
Class E Airspace Areas Extending
Upward from 700 feet or More Above
the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ASO TN E5 Parsons, TN [REVISED]
Parsons, Scott Field Airport, TN
(Lat. 36°39′16″ N, long. 88°07′41″ W)
Beech River Regional Airport, TN
(Lat 35°39′20″ N, long. 88°11′45″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile
radius of Scott Field Airport, and that
airspace within a 6.5-mile radius of Beech
River Regional Airport; excluding that
airspace within the Lexington, TN, Class E
airspace area.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on
February 1, 2005.
Mark D. Ward,
Acting Area Director, Eastern EnRoute &
Oceanic Operations, ATO–E.
[FR Doc. 05–3615 Filed 2–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4062 and 4063
RIN 1212–AB03
Liability Pursuant to Section 4062(e) of
ERISA
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The PBGC proposes to amend
its regulations to provide a rule for
computing liability under section
4063(b) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (‘‘ERISA’’)
when there is a substantial cessation of
operations by an employer as described
by section 4062(e) of ERISA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 26, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed
or delivered to the Legislative and
Regulatory Department, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20005–4026.
Comments also may be submitted
electronically through the PBGC’s Web
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 37 / Friday, February 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules
site at https://www.pbgc.gov/regs, or by
fax to (202) 326–4112. The PBGC will
make all comments available on its Web
site, https://www.pbgc.gov. Copies of the
comments may also be obtained by
writing to the PBGC’s Communications
and Public Affairs Department at Suite
240 at the above address or by visiting
that office or calling (202) 326–4040
during normal business hours. (TTY and
TDD users may call the Federal relay
service toll-free at 1–800–877–8339 and
ask to be connected to 202–326–4040.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James J. Armbruster, Acting Director, or
James L. Beller, Attorney, Legislative
and Regulatory Department, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005–
4026, (202) 326–4024. (TTY and TTD
users may call the Federal relay service
toll-free at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to
be connected to (202) 326–4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed rule is part of the Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s (PBGC’s)
ongoing effort to streamline regulation
and improve administration of the
pension insurance program.
Section 4062(e) of ERISA provides
special rules that apply when ‘‘an
employer ceases operations at a facility
in any location and, as a result of such
cessation of operations, more than 20
percent of the total number of his
employees who are participants under a
plan established and maintained by him
are separated from employment’’ (a
‘‘section 4062(e) event’’). In the case of
a section 4062(e) event, the employer
‘‘shall be treated with respect to that
plan as if he were a substantial
employer under a plan under which
more than one employer makes
contributions and the provisions of
§§ 4063, 4064, and 4065 shall apply.’’
Section 4063(b) imposes liability
upon a substantial employer that
withdraws from a multiple employer
plan. This section 4063(b) liability
represents the withdrawing employer’s
share of the total liability to the PBGC
that would arise if the plan were to
terminate without enough assets to pay
all benefit liabilities. (In general, the
total liability to the PBGC upon
termination of a plan is the amount of
the plan’s unfunded benefit liabilities,
together with interest). The section
4063(b) liability payment made by the
employer is held in escrow by the
PBGC. If the plan terminates within five
years, the section 4063(b) liability
payment is treated as part of the plan’s
assets. If the plan does not terminate
within five years, the liability payment
is returned to the employer. The statute
also provides that, in lieu of the liability
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:21 Feb 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
payment, the contributing sponsor may
be required to furnish a bond to the
PBGC in an amount not exceeding 150%
of the section 4063(b) liability.
The statute also specifies a method of
computing the amount of the section
4063(b) liability. Section 4063(b)
provides that ‘‘[t]he amount of liability
shall be computed on the basis of an
amount determined by the [PBGC] to be
the amount described in section 4062
for the entire plan, as if the plan had
been terminated by the [PBGC] on the
date of the withdrawal, multiplied by a
fraction (1) the numerator of which is
the total amount required to be
contributed to the plan by such
contributing sponsor for the last 5 years
ending prior to the withdrawal, and (2)
the denominator of which is the total
amount required to be contributed to the
plan by all contributing sponsors for
such last 5 years.’’
In sum, section 4063(b) imposes
liability and provides a method for
determining the amount of that
liability—i.e., for determining the
withdrawing employer’s portion of the
total liability to the PBGC that would
arise if the plan terminated.
Section 4062(e) provides that, when a
section 4062(e) event occurs, the
employer is treated as a substantial
employer under a multiple employer
plan. Thus, section 4062(e) creates
liability that is analogous to the section
4063(b) liability arising when a
substantial employer withdraws from a
multiple employer plan. Section 4062(e)
does not, however, provide any details
as to how this analogy is to be
implemented—i.e., how the total
liability is to be apportioned with
respect to the cessation of operations.
As explained above, when a
substantial employer withdraws from a
multiple employer plan, section 4063(b)
allocates liability to that withdrawing
employer based upon the ratio of the
employer’s required contributions to all
required contributions for the five years
preceding the withdrawal. The PBGC
has found that application of this
statutory allocation formula is relatively
straightforward when determining
withdrawal liability under a multiple
employer plan because it is easy to
verify what contributions were required
to be made by the withdrawing
employer and what contributions were
required to be made by all of the
contributing employers.
In contrast, when there is a section
4062(e) event, there is by definition only
one employer that contributes to the
plan. When there is only one employer,
the numerator and denominator used to
determine the liability under section
4063(b) would always be equal. Thus, it
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9259
is impracticable to use the allocation
method described in section 4063(b) to
determine the liability arising upon a
section 4062(e) event. Instead, the PBGC
has been using the method proposed in
this rule to determine that liability on a
case-by-case basis.
Section 4063(b) of ERISA provides
that ‘‘in addition to and in lieu of’’ the
manner of computing the liability
prescribed in that provision, the PBGC
‘‘may also determine the liability on any
other equitable basis prescribed by the
[PBGC] in regulations.’’ Pursuant to that
authority, the PBGC is proposing in this
rule a simple, practicable, and equitable
method for determining the liability for
a section 4062(e) event. Specifically, the
PBGC proposes to compute that liability
by multiplying the total liability under
section 4062 by a fraction (1) the
numerator of which is the number of the
employer’s employees who are
participants under the plan and are
separated from employment as a result
of the cessation of operations, and (2)
the denominator of which is the total
number of the employer’s employees
who were participants under the plan
before taking into account the cessation
of operations. The PBGC would
determine the total liability under
section 4062 as if the plan had been
terminated by the PBGC immediately
after the cessation of operations rather
than ‘‘on the date of the withdrawal’’ (as
specified in section 4063(b)), which
does not literally apply in the case of a
section 4062(e) event.
By providing a simple and transparent
method for determining the amount of
this liability, this rule will allow plan
sponsors who experience a section
4062(e) event (or believe they may
experience a section 4062(e) event) to
readily determine their liability (or
expected liability). Although the
proposed rule would specify a method
for determining the amount of the
liability imposed by statute, it would
not affect the imposition of liability.
Moreover, because the PBGC has
generally followed this method on a
case-by-case basis, the proposed rule
would have little or no effect on the
amount of liability.
Nothing in this proposed rule would
affect the computation of liability
incurred when there is a withdrawal of
a substantial employer from a multiple
employer plan under ERISA section
4063.
Compliance With Rulemaking
Guidelines
The PBGC has determined, in
consultation with the Office of
Management and Budget, that this
proposed rule is a ‘‘significant
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
9260
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 37 / Friday, February 25, 2005 / Proposed Rules
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866. The Office of Management
and Budget, therefore, has reviewed this
notice under Executive Order 12866.
The PBGC certifies under section
605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
that this proposed rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. A
section 4062(e) event is generally not
relevant for small employers. Most
small employers sponsoring defined
benefit plans tend not to have multiple
operations. For these small employers,
the shutdown of operations would be
accompanied by plan termination.
Section 4062(e) protection is only
relevant when the plan is ongoing after
the cessation of operations. Thus, the
change would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Accordingly,
sections 603 and 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act do not apply.
List of Subjects
29 CFR Part 4062
Employee Benefit Plans, Pension
insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
29 CFR Part 4063
Employee Benefit Plans, Pension
insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth above, the
PBGC proposes to amend parts 4062 and
4063 of 29 CFR chapter LX as follows:
PART 4062—LIABILITY FOR
TERMINATION OF SINGLE-EMPLOYER
PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 4062
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1362–
1364, 1367, 1368.
2. Amend § 4062.1 by adding the
following sentence after the first
sentence to read as follows:
§ 4062.1
§ 4062.8
4062(e).
If, pursuant to section 4062(e) of
ERISA, an employer ceases operations at
a facility in any location and, as a result
of such cessation of operations, more
than 20% of the total number of the
employer’s employees who are
participants under a plan established
and maintained by the employer are
separated from employment, the PBGC
will determine the amount of liability
under section 4063(b) of ERISA to be the
amount described in section 4062 of
ERISA for the entire plan, as if the plan
had been terminated by the PBGC
immediately after the date of the
cessation of operations, multiplied by a
fraction—
(a) The numerator of which is the
number of the employer’s employees
who are participants under the plan and
are separated from employment as a
result of the cessation of operations; and
(b) The denominator of which is the
total number of the employer’s
employees who were participants under
the plan before taking the cessation of
operations into account.
§ 4062.3
§ 4062.7
PART 4063—LIABILITY OF
SUBSTANTIAL EMPLOYER FOR
WITHDRAWAL FROM SINGLEEMPLOYER PLANS UNDER MULTIPLE
CONTROLLED GROUPS AND OF
EMPLOYER EXPERIENCING A
CESSATION OF OPERATION
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3).
§§ 4062.8, 4062.9, and 4062.10
[Redesignated]
3. Redesignate §§ 4062.8, 4062.9, and
4062.10 as §§ 4062.9, 4062.10, and
4062.11, respectively.
4. Add new § 4062.8 to read as
follows:
Jkt 205001
[Amended]
6. In paragraph (a) of § 4062.7, remove
the reference to ‘‘§ 4062.8’’ and add in
its place the reference ‘‘§ 4062.9’’.
Purpose and scope.
*
*
*
*
This part also sets forth rules for
determining the amount of liability
incurred under section 4063 of ERISA
pursuant to the occurrence of a
cessation of operations as described by
section 4062(e) of ERISA.
*
*
*
*
*
16:21 Feb 24, 2005
[Amended]
5. In paragraph (b) of § 4062.3, remove
the references to ‘‘§ 4062.8(c)’’ and
‘‘4062.8(b)’’ and add the references to
‘‘§ 4062.9(c)’’ and ‘‘§ 4062.9(b)’’ in their
places, respectively.
7. The authority citation for part 4063
continues to read as follows:
*
VerDate jul<14>2003
Liability pursuant to section
8. Revise paragraph (a) of § 4063.1 to
read as follows:
§ 4063.1
Cross-references.
(a) Part 4062 of this chapter sets forth
rules for determination and payment of
the liability incurred, under section
4062(b) of ERISA, upon termination of
any single-employer plan and, to the
extent appropriate, determination of the
liability incurred with respect to
multiple employer plans under sections
4063 and 4064 of ERISA. Part 4062 also
sets forth rules for determining the
amount of liability incurred under
section 4063 of ERISA pursuant to the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
occurrence of a cessation of operations
as described by section 4062(e) of
ERISA.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, this 22nd day
of February, 2005.
Bradley D. Belt,
Executive Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 05–3702 Filed 2–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7708–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 311
[Administrative Instruction 81]
Privacy Act; Implementation
Office of the Secretary, DoD.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of
Defense is proposing to exempt those
records contained in DCIFA 01, entitled
‘‘CIFA Operational and Analytical
Records’’ when an exemption has been
previously claimed for the records in
another Privacy Act system of records.
The exemption is intended to preserve
the exempt status of the record when
the purposes underlying the exemption
for the original records are still valid
and necessary to protect the contents of
the records.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 26, 2005, to be
considered by this agency.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to OSD
Privacy Act Coordinator, Records
Management Section, Washington
Headquarters Services, 1155 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–1155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Juanita Irvin at (703) 601–4722,
extension 110.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. This rules do
not (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 37 (Friday, February 25, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9258-9260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-3702]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4062 and 4063
RIN 1212-AB03
Liability Pursuant to Section 4062(e) of ERISA
AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The PBGC proposes to amend its regulations to provide a rule
for computing liability under section 4063(b) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (``ERISA'') when there is a
substantial cessation of operations by an employer as described by
section 4062(e) of ERISA.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 26, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed or delivered to the Legislative and
Regulatory Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005-4026. Comments also may be submitted
electronically through the PBGC's Web
[[Page 9259]]
site at https://www.pbgc.gov/regs, or by fax to (202) 326-4112. The PBGC
will make all comments available on its Web site, https://www.pbgc.gov.
Copies of the comments may also be obtained by writing to the PBGC's
Communications and Public Affairs Department at Suite 240 at the above
address or by visiting that office or calling (202) 326-4040 during
normal business hours. (TTY and TDD users may call the Federal relay
service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-
4040.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James J. Armbruster, Acting Director,
or James L. Beller, Attorney, Legislative and Regulatory Department,
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20005-4026, (202) 326-4024. (TTY and TTD users may call the Federal
relay service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to be connected to
(202) 326-4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule is part of the Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation's (PBGC's) ongoing effort to streamline
regulation and improve administration of the pension insurance program.
Section 4062(e) of ERISA provides special rules that apply when
``an employer ceases operations at a facility in any location and, as a
result of such cessation of operations, more than 20 percent of the
total number of his employees who are participants under a plan
established and maintained by him are separated from employment'' (a
``section 4062(e) event''). In the case of a section 4062(e) event, the
employer ``shall be treated with respect to that plan as if he were a
substantial employer under a plan under which more than one employer
makes contributions and the provisions of Sec. Sec. 4063, 4064, and
4065 shall apply.''
Section 4063(b) imposes liability upon a substantial employer that
withdraws from a multiple employer plan. This section 4063(b) liability
represents the withdrawing employer's share of the total liability to
the PBGC that would arise if the plan were to terminate without enough
assets to pay all benefit liabilities. (In general, the total liability
to the PBGC upon termination of a plan is the amount of the plan's
unfunded benefit liabilities, together with interest). The section
4063(b) liability payment made by the employer is held in escrow by the
PBGC. If the plan terminates within five years, the section 4063(b)
liability payment is treated as part of the plan's assets. If the plan
does not terminate within five years, the liability payment is returned
to the employer. The statute also provides that, in lieu of the
liability payment, the contributing sponsor may be required to furnish
a bond to the PBGC in an amount not exceeding 150% of the section
4063(b) liability.
The statute also specifies a method of computing the amount of the
section 4063(b) liability. Section 4063(b) provides that ``[t]he amount
of liability shall be computed on the basis of an amount determined by
the [PBGC] to be the amount described in section 4062 for the entire
plan, as if the plan had been terminated by the [PBGC] on the date of
the withdrawal, multiplied by a fraction (1) the numerator of which is
the total amount required to be contributed to the plan by such
contributing sponsor for the last 5 years ending prior to the
withdrawal, and (2) the denominator of which is the total amount
required to be contributed to the plan by all contributing sponsors for
such last 5 years.''
In sum, section 4063(b) imposes liability and provides a method for
determining the amount of that liability--i.e., for determining the
withdrawing employer's portion of the total liability to the PBGC that
would arise if the plan terminated.
Section 4062(e) provides that, when a section 4062(e) event occurs,
the employer is treated as a substantial employer under a multiple
employer plan. Thus, section 4062(e) creates liability that is
analogous to the section 4063(b) liability arising when a substantial
employer withdraws from a multiple employer plan. Section 4062(e) does
not, however, provide any details as to how this analogy is to be
implemented--i.e., how the total liability is to be apportioned with
respect to the cessation of operations.
As explained above, when a substantial employer withdraws from a
multiple employer plan, section 4063(b) allocates liability to that
withdrawing employer based upon the ratio of the employer's required
contributions to all required contributions for the five years
preceding the withdrawal. The PBGC has found that application of this
statutory allocation formula is relatively straightforward when
determining withdrawal liability under a multiple employer plan because
it is easy to verify what contributions were required to be made by the
withdrawing employer and what contributions were required to be made by
all of the contributing employers.
In contrast, when there is a section 4062(e) event, there is by
definition only one employer that contributes to the plan. When there
is only one employer, the numerator and denominator used to determine
the liability under section 4063(b) would always be equal. Thus, it is
impracticable to use the allocation method described in section 4063(b)
to determine the liability arising upon a section 4062(e) event.
Instead, the PBGC has been using the method proposed in this rule to
determine that liability on a case-by-case basis.
Section 4063(b) of ERISA provides that ``in addition to and in lieu
of'' the manner of computing the liability prescribed in that
provision, the PBGC ``may also determine the liability on any other
equitable basis prescribed by the [PBGC] in regulations.'' Pursuant to
that authority, the PBGC is proposing in this rule a simple,
practicable, and equitable method for determining the liability for a
section 4062(e) event. Specifically, the PBGC proposes to compute that
liability by multiplying the total liability under section 4062 by a
fraction (1) the numerator of which is the number of the employer's
employees who are participants under the plan and are separated from
employment as a result of the cessation of operations, and (2) the
denominator of which is the total number of the employer's employees
who were participants under the plan before taking into account the
cessation of operations. The PBGC would determine the total liability
under section 4062 as if the plan had been terminated by the PBGC
immediately after the cessation of operations rather than ``on the date
of the withdrawal'' (as specified in section 4063(b)), which does not
literally apply in the case of a section 4062(e) event.
By providing a simple and transparent method for determining the
amount of this liability, this rule will allow plan sponsors who
experience a section 4062(e) event (or believe they may experience a
section 4062(e) event) to readily determine their liability (or
expected liability). Although the proposed rule would specify a method
for determining the amount of the liability imposed by statute, it
would not affect the imposition of liability. Moreover, because the
PBGC has generally followed this method on a case-by-case basis, the
proposed rule would have little or no effect on the amount of
liability.
Nothing in this proposed rule would affect the computation of
liability incurred when there is a withdrawal of a substantial employer
from a multiple employer plan under ERISA section 4063.
Compliance With Rulemaking Guidelines
The PBGC has determined, in consultation with the Office of
Management and Budget, that this proposed rule is a ``significant
[[Page 9260]]
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866. The Office of
Management and Budget, therefore, has reviewed this notice under
Executive Order 12866.
The PBGC certifies under section 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act that this proposed rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. A section
4062(e) event is generally not relevant for small employers. Most small
employers sponsoring defined benefit plans tend not to have multiple
operations. For these small employers, the shutdown of operations would
be accompanied by plan termination. Section 4062(e) protection is only
relevant when the plan is ongoing after the cessation of operations.
Thus, the change would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Accordingly, sections 603 and 604
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act do not apply.
List of Subjects
29 CFR Part 4062
Employee Benefit Plans, Pension insurance, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
29 CFR Part 4063
Employee Benefit Plans, Pension insurance, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth above, the PBGC proposes to amend parts
4062 and 4063 of 29 CFR chapter LX as follows:
PART 4062--LIABILITY FOR TERMINATION OF SINGLE-EMPLOYER PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 4062 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1362-1364, 1367, 1368.
2. Amend Sec. 4062.1 by adding the following sentence after the
first sentence to read as follows:
Sec. 4062.1 Purpose and scope.
* * * * *
This part also sets forth rules for determining the amount of
liability incurred under section 4063 of ERISA pursuant to the
occurrence of a cessation of operations as described by section 4062(e)
of ERISA.
* * * * *
Sec. Sec. 4062.8, 4062.9, and 4062.10 [Redesignated]
3. Redesignate Sec. Sec. 4062.8, 4062.9, and 4062.10 as Sec. Sec.
4062.9, 4062.10, and 4062.11, respectively.
4. Add new Sec. 4062.8 to read as follows:
Sec. 4062.8 Liability pursuant to section 4062(e).
If, pursuant to section 4062(e) of ERISA, an employer ceases
operations at a facility in any location and, as a result of such
cessation of operations, more than 20% of the total number of the
employer's employees who are participants under a plan established and
maintained by the employer are separated from employment, the PBGC will
determine the amount of liability under section 4063(b) of ERISA to be
the amount described in section 4062 of ERISA for the entire plan, as
if the plan had been terminated by the PBGC immediately after the date
of the cessation of operations, multiplied by a fraction--
(a) The numerator of which is the number of the employer's
employees who are participants under the plan and are separated from
employment as a result of the cessation of operations; and
(b) The denominator of which is the total number of the employer's
employees who were participants under the plan before taking the
cessation of operations into account.
Sec. 4062.3 [Amended]
5. In paragraph (b) of Sec. 4062.3, remove the references to
``Sec. 4062.8(c)'' and ``4062.8(b)'' and add the references to ``Sec.
4062.9(c)'' and ``Sec. 4062.9(b)'' in their places, respectively.
Sec. 4062.7 [Amended]
6. In paragraph (a) of Sec. 4062.7, remove the reference to
``Sec. 4062.8'' and add in its place the reference ``Sec. 4062.9''.
PART 4063--LIABILITY OF SUBSTANTIAL EMPLOYER FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM
SINGLE-EMPLOYER PLANS UNDER MULTIPLE CONTROLLED GROUPS AND OF
EMPLOYER EXPERIENCING A CESSATION OF OPERATION
7. The authority citation for part 4063 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3).
8. Revise paragraph (a) of Sec. 4063.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 4063.1 Cross-references.
(a) Part 4062 of this chapter sets forth rules for determination
and payment of the liability incurred, under section 4062(b) of ERISA,
upon termination of any single-employer plan and, to the extent
appropriate, determination of the liability incurred with respect to
multiple employer plans under sections 4063 and 4064 of ERISA. Part
4062 also sets forth rules for determining the amount of liability
incurred under section 4063 of ERISA pursuant to the occurrence of a
cessation of operations as described by section 4062(e) of ERISA.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, this 22nd day of February, 2005.
Bradley D. Belt,
Executive Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 05-3702 Filed 2-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7708-01-P