Office of Innovation and Improvement Program (OII); Overview Information; Ready To Teach Program; Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2005, 9053-9059 [E5-764]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
time monitoring of molecular binding
for pharmaceutical drug discovery in
the United States and certain foreign
countries, the Government-Owned
inventions described in U.S. Patent No.
5,372,930: Sensors for Ultra-Low
Concentration Molecular Recognition,
Navy Case No. 73,568//U.S. Patent No.
5,807,758: Chemical and Biological
Sensor Using an Ultra-Sensitive Force
Transducer, Navy Case No. 76,628//U.S.
Patent No. 5,981,297: Biosensor Using
Magnetically-Detected Label, Navy Case
No. 77,576//U.S. Patent No. 6,180,418:
Force Discrimination Assay, Navy Case
No. 78,183.
DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the
grant of this license must file written
objections along with supporting
evidence, if any, not later than March
11, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be
filed with the Naval Research
Laboratory, Code 1004, 4555 Overlook
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375–
5320.
Ms.
Jane Kuhl, Head, Technology Transfer
Office, NRL Code 1004, 4555 Overlook
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20375–
5320, telephone (202) 767–3083.
Due to U.S. Postal delays, please fax
(202) 404–7920, E-Mail:
kuhl@utopia.nrl.navy.mil or use courier
delivery to expedite response.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404.
Dated: February 17, 2005.
I.C. Le Moyne, Jr.,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General’s Corps,
U.S. Navy, Alternate Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–3540 Filed 2–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–U
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Notice of Intent To Grant Partially
Exclusive Patent License; Smartband
Technologies, Inc.
Department of the Navy, DOD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy
hereby gives notice of its intent to grant
to Smartband Technologies, Inc. a
revocable, nonassignable, partially
exclusive license to practice in the
United States, the Government-Owned
inventions described in U.S. Patent No.
5,963,169, Multiple Tube Plasma
Antenna, issued October 5, 1999; U.S.
Patent No. 6,118,407, Horizontal Plasma
Antenna Using Plasma Drift Currents,
issued September 12, 2000; U.S. Patent
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404.
Dated: February 17, 2005.
I.C. Le Moyne Jr.,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate General’s Corps,
U.S. Navy, Alternate Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–3539 Filed 2–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
Department of the Navy
VerDate jul<14>2003
No. 6,169,520, Plasma Antenna With
Currents Generated By Opposed Photon
Beams, issued January 2, 2001; U.S.
Patent No. 6,087,992, Acoustically
Driven Plasma Antenna, issued July 11,
2000; U.S. Patent No. 6,046,705,
Standing Wave Plasma Antenna With
Plasma Reflector, issued April 4, 2000;
U.S. Patent No. 6,087,993, Plasma
Antenna with Electro-Optical Modulator
issued, July 11, 2000; U.S. Patent No.
6,674,970, Plasma Antenna With TwoFluid Ionization Current, issued January
6, 2004; U.S. Patent No. 6,650,297, Laser
Driven Plasma Antenna Utilizing Laser
Modified Maxwellian Relaxation, issued
November 18, 2003; U.S. Patent No.
6,657,594, Plasma Antenna System and
Method issued December 2, 2003; and
U.S. Patent No. 6,806,833, Confined
Plasma Resonance Antenna and Plasma
Resonance Antenna Array, issued
October 19, 2004.
DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the
grant of this license has fifteen (15) days
from the date of this notice to file
written objections along with
supporting evidence, if any.
ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be
filed with the Naval Undersea Warfare
Center Division, Newport, 1176 Howell
St., Bldg 990/1, Code 105, Newport, RI
02841.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Theresa A. Baus, Technology Transfer
Manager, Naval Undersea Warfare
Center Division, Newport, 1176 Howell
St., Bldg 990/1, Code 105, Newport, RI
02841, telephone 401–832–8728.
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Innovation and Improvement
Program (OII); Overview Information;
Ready To Teach Program; Notice
Inviting Applications for New Awards
for Fiscal Year (FY) 2005
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Numbers: 84.286A and 84.286B
Dates: Applications Available:
February 25, 2005.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
March 24, 2005.
Date of Pre-Application Meeting:
March 11, 2005 (webcast).
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: April 20, 2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9053
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: June 20, 2005.
Eligible Applicants: For General
Programming Grants (84.286A)—A
nonprofit telecommunications entity or
partnership of telecommunications
entities.
For Digital Educational Programming
Grants (84.286B)—A local public
telecommunications entity, as defined
in section 397(12) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, that is able to demonstrate a
capacity for the development and
distribution of educational and
instructional television programming of
high quality. Under section 397(12) of
the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, the term public
telecommunications entity means any
enterprise which—
(A) Is a public broadcast station or a
noncommercial telecommunications
entity; and
(B) Disseminates public
telecommunications services to the
public.
Estimated Available Funds:
$14,290,752.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$1,500,000–$5,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$2,500,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 3–6.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months for
84.286A and up to 36 months for
84.286B.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Ready to
Teach program awards two types of
competitive grants: (a) Grants to carry
out a national telecommunicationsbased program to improve teaching in
core curriculum areas (General
Programming Grants); and (b) digital
educational programming grants to
develop, produce, and distribute
innovative educational and
instructional video programming
(Digital Educational Programming
Grants). The Ready to Teach program is
designed to assist elementary school
and secondary school teachers in
preparing all students to achieve
challenging State academic content and
student academic achievement
standards in core curriculum areas.
Statutory Requirements: As set forth
in the program statute, to be eligible to
receive a General Programming Grant
(84.286A), an applicant must—
(1) Demonstrate, in its application,
that it will use the public broadcasting
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
9054
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
infrastructure, the Internet, and school
digital networks, where available, to
deliver video and data in an integrated
service to train teachers in the use of
materials and learning technologies for
achieving challenging State academic
content and student academic
achievement standards;
(2) Make an assurance in its
application that its project will be
conducted in cooperation with
appropriate State educational agencies,
local educational agencies, and State or
local nonprofit public
telecommunications entities; and
(3) Make an assurance in its
application that a significant portion of
the benefits available for elementary
schools and secondary schools from its
project will be available to schools of
local educational agencies that have a
high percentage of children eligible
under title I of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965
(ESEA), as amended by the No Child
Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB).
In addition, as required by the
program statute, in order to be eligible
to receive a Digital Educational
Programming Grant (84.286B), an
applicant must propose activities to
facilitate the development of
educational programming that shall—
(1) Include student assessment tools
to provide feedback on student
academic achievement;
(2) Include built-in teacher utilization
and support components to ensure that
teachers understand and can easily use
the content of the programming with
group instruction or for individual
student use;
(3) Be created for, or adaptable to,
challenging State academic content
standards and student academic
achievement standards; and
(4) Be capable of distribution through
digital broadcasting and school digital
networks.
Priority: This priority is from the
notice of final priority for Scientifically
Based Evaluation Methods, published in
the Federal Register on January 25,
2005 (70 FR 3586).
Competitive Preference Priority: For
FY 2005 this priority is a competitive
preference priority. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(i) we award up to an
additional 25 points to an application,
depending on the extent to which the
application meets this priority.
Note: In awarding additional points to
applications that address this competitive
preference priority, we will consider only
those applications that have top-ranked
scores on the basis of the Selection Criteria
in section V. of this notice.
The priority is: The Secretary
establishes a priority for projects
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
proposing an evaluation plan that is
based on rigorous scientifically based
research methods to assess the
effectiveness of a particular
intervention. The Secretary intends that
this priority will allow program
participants and the Department to
determine whether the project produces
meaningful effects on student
achievement or teacher performance.
Evaluation methods using an
experimental design are best for
determining project effectiveness. Thus,
when feasible, the project must use an
experimental design under which
participants—e.g., students, teachers,
classrooms, or schools—are randomly
assigned to participate in the project
activities being evaluated or to a control
group that does not participate in the
project activities being evaluated.
If random assignment is not feasible,
the project may use a quasiexperimental design with carefully
matched comparison conditions. This
alternative design attempts to
approximate a randomly assigned
control group by matching
participants—e.g., students, teachers,
classrooms, or schools—with nonparticipants having similar pre-program
characteristics.
In cases where random assignment is
not possible and participation in the
intervention is determined by a
specified cutting point on a quantified
continuum of scores, regression
discontinuity designs may be employed.
For projects that are focused on
special populations in which sufficient
numbers of participants are not
available to support random assignment
or matched comparison group designs,
single-subject designs such as multiple
baseline or treatment-reversal or
interrupted time series that are capable
of demonstrating causal relationships
can be employed.
Proposed evaluation strategies that
use neither experimental designs with
random assignment nor quasiexperimental designs using a matched
comparison group nor regression
discontinuity designs will not be
considered responsive to the priority
when sufficient numbers of participants
are available to support these designs.
Evaluation strategies that involve too
small a number of participants to
support group designs must be capable
of demonstrating the causal effects of an
intervention or program on those
participants.
The proposed evaluation plan must
describe how the project evaluator will
collect—before the project intervention
commences and after it ends—valid and
reliable data that measure the impact of
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
participation in the program or in the
comparison group.
If the priority is used as a competitive
preference priority, points awarded
under this priority will be determined
by the quality of the proposed
evaluation method. In determining the
quality of the evaluation method, we
will consider the extent to which the
applicant presents a feasible, credible
plan that includes the following:
(1) The type of design to be used (that
is, random assignment or matched
comparison). If matched comparison,
include in the plan a discussion of why
random assignment is not feasible.
(2) Outcomes to be measured.
(3) A discussion of how the applicant
plans to assign students, teachers,
classrooms, or schools to the project and
control group or match them for
comparison with other students,
teachers, classrooms, or schools.
(4) A proposed evaluator, preferably
independent, with the necessary
background and technical expertise to
carry out the proposed evaluation. An
independent evaluator does not have
any authority over the project and is not
involved in its implementation.
In general, depending on the
implemented program or project, under
a competitive preference priority,
random assignment evaluation methods
will receive more points than matched
comparison evaluation methods.
Definitions
As used in this notice—
Scientifically based research (section
9101(37) of the ESEA as amended by
NCLB, 20 U.S.C. 7801(37)):
(A) Means research that involves the
application of rigorous, systematic, and
objective procedures to obtain reliable
and valid knowledge relevant to
education activities and programs; and
(B) Includes research that—
(i) Employs systematic, empirical
methods that draw on observation or
experiment;
(ii) Involves rigorous data analyses
that are adequate to test the stated
hypotheses and justify the general
conclusions drawn;
(iii) Relies on measurements or
observational methods that provide
reliable and valid data across evaluators
and observers, across multiple
measurements and observations, and
across studies by the same or different
investigators;
(iv) Is evaluated using experimental or
quasi-experimental designs in which
individuals entities, programs, or
activities are assigned to different
conditions and with appropriate
controls to evaluate the effects of the
condition of interest, with a preference
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
for random-assignment experiments, or
other designs to the extent that those
designs contain within-condition or
across-condition controls;
(v) Ensures that experimental studies
are presented in sufficient detail and
clarity to allow for replication or, at a
minimum, offer the opportunity to build
systematically on their findings; and
(vi) Has been accepted by a peerreviewed journal or approved by a panel
of independent experts through a
comparably rigorous, objective, and
scientific review.
Random assignment or experimental
design means random assignment of
students, teachers, classrooms, or
schools to participate in a project being
evaluated (treatment group) or not
participate in the project (control
group). The effect of the project is the
difference in outcomes between the
treatment and control groups.
Quasi experimental designs include
several designs that attempt to
approximate a random assignment
design.
Carefully matched comparison groups
design means a quasi-experimental
design in which project participants are
matched with non-participants based on
key characteristics that are thought to be
related to the outcome.
Regression discontinuity design
means a quasi-experimental design that
closely approximates an experimental
design. In a regression discontinuity
design, participants are assigned to a
treatment or control group based on a
numerical rating or score of a variable
unrelated to the treatment such as the
rating of an application for funding.
Eligible students, teachers, classrooms,
or schools above a certain score (‘‘cut
score’’) are assigned to the treatment
group and those below the score are
assigned to the control group. In the
case of the scores of applicants’
proposals for funding, the ‘‘cut score’’ is
established at the point where the
program funds available are exhausted.
Single subject design means a design
that relies on the comparison of
treatment effects on a single subject or
group of single subjects. There is little
confidence that findings based on this
design would be the same for other
members of the population.
Treatment reversal design means a
single subject design in which a pretreatment or baseline outcome
measurement is compared with a posttreatment measure. Treatment would
then be stopped for a period of time, a
second baseline measure of the outcome
would be taken, followed by a second
application of the treatment or a
different treatment. For example, this
design might be used to evaluate a
VerDate jul<14>2003
20:54 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
behavior modification program for
disabled students with behavior
disorders.
Multiple baseline design means a
single subject design to address
concerns about the effects of normal
development, timing of the treatment,
and amount of the treatment with
treatment-reversal designs by using a
varying time schedule for introduction
of the treatment and/or treatments of
different lengths or intensity.
Interrupted time series design means
a quasi-experimental design in which
the outcome of interest is measured
multiple times before and after the
treatment for program participants only.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7257—
7257d.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84,
85, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The notice of
final priority for Scientifically Based
Evaluation Methods, published in the
Federal Register on January 25, 2005
(70 FR 3586).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to institutions of higher education
only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds:
$14,290,752.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$1,500,000–$5,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$2,500,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 3–6.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months for
84.286A and up to 36 months for
84.286B.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants:
For General Programming Grants
(84.286A)—A nonprofit
telecommunications entity or
partnership of nonprofit
telecommunications entities.
For Digital Educational Programming
Grants (84.286B)—A local public
telecommunications entity, as defined
in section 397(12) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, that is able to demonstrate a
capacity for the development and
distribution of educational and
instructional television programming of
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9055
high quality. Under section 397(12) of
the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, the term public
telecommunications entity means any
enterprise which—
(A) Is a public broadcast station or a
noncommercial telecommunications
entity; and
(B) Disseminates public
telecommunications services to the
public.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: An
applicant submitting an application
under the competition for General
Programming Grants (84.286A) is not
required to provide matching funds.
However, to be eligible to receive a
Digital Educational Programming Grant
(84.286B), an applicant must contribute
non-Federal matching funds in an
amount equal to not less than 100
percent of the amount of the grant. Such
matching funds may include funds
provided for the transition to digital
broadcasting, as well as in-kind
contributions.
An entity that receives a General
Programming Grant or a Digital
Educational Programming Grant, may
not use more than 5 percent of the
amount received under the grant for
administrative purposes.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package: You may obtain an application
package via Internet or from the
Education Publications Center (ED
Pubs). To obtain a copy via Internet use
the following address: https://
www.ed.gov/pubs/edpubs.html. To
obtain a copy from ED Pubs, write or
call the following: Education
Publications Center (ED Pubs), P.O. Box
1398, Jessup, MD 20794–1398.
Telephone (toll free): 1–877–433–7827.
FAX: (301) 470–1244. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), you may call (toll free): 1–877–
576–7734.
You may also contact ED Pubs at its
Web site: https://www.ed.gov/pubs/
edpubs.html or you may contact ED
Pubs at its e-mail address:
edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application from ED
Pubs, be sure to identify this
competition as follows: CFDA number
84.286A or 84.286B, as appropriate.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain a copy of the application package
in an alternative format (e.g., Braille,
large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) by contacting the program
contact person listed elsewhere in this
notice under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT (see VII. Agency Contacts).
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
9056
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission: Requirements concerning
the content of an application, together
with the forms you must submit, are in
the application package for this
program.
Notice of Intent to Apply: Applicants
that plan to apply for funding under this
program are encouraged to indicate an
intent to apply via e-mail notification
sent to readytoteachintent@ed.gov no
later than March 24, 2005. Applicants
that fail to supply this e-mail
notification may still apply for funding
under this program. Page Limit for
Program Narrative: The program
narrative is where you, the applicant,
address the selection criteria using the
following standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
program narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions, as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
Although no page limit is required,
applicants are encouraged to confine the
program narrative to no more than 50
pages.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: February 25,
2005.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
March 24, 2005.
Date of Pre-Application Meeting:
March 11, 2005, at 3 p.m., Washington,
DC time. The Department intends to
hold a live webcast to permit potential
applicants to pose questions about this
grant competition and other technology
grant competitions being held by OII.
Following the live presentation, the
webcast will be archived and remain
online until the application deadline
date. Interested applicants should link
to the following site to participate in or
access the Web cast: https://
www.kidzonline.org/tepwebcast. You
may submit your intent to participate in
the Web cast to tepwebcast@ed.gov.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: April 20, 2005.
Applications for grants under this
competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov
Apply site (Grants.gov). For information
(including dates and times) about how
to submit your application
electronically or by mail or hand
delivery if you qualify for an exception
to the electronic submission
requirement, please refer to section IV.6.
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
Other Submission Requirements in this
notice.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: June 20, 2005.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference
the regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
6. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants under this
program must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in
accordance with the instructions in this
section.
a. Electronic Submission of
Applications.
Applications for grants under the
Ready To Teach program-CFDA
Numbers 84.286A and 84.286B must be
submitted electronically using the
Grants.gov Apply site. Through this site,
you will be able to download a copy of
the application package, complete it
offline, and then upload and submit
your application. You may not e-mail an
electronic copy of a grant application to
us.
We will reject your application if you
submit it in paper format unless, as
described elsewhere in this section, you
qualify for one of the exceptions to the
electronic submission requirement and
submit, no later than two weeks before
the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you
qualify for one of these exceptions.
Further information regarding
calculation of the date that is two weeks
before the application deadline date is
provided later in this section under
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant
application for Ready To Teach at:
https://www.grants.gov. You must search
for the downloadable application
package for this program by the CFDA
number. Do not include the CFDA
number’s alpha suffix in your search.
Please note the following:
• When you enter the Grants.gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation.
• Applications received by Grants.gov
are time and date stamped. Your
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
application must be fully uploaded and
submitted with a date/time received by
the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. We will not
consider your application if it was
received by the Grants.gov system later
than 4:30 p.m. on the application
deadline date. When we retrieve your
application from Grants.gov, we will
notify you if we are rejecting your
application because it was submitted
after 4:30 p.m. on the application
deadline date.
• The amount of time it can take to
upload an application will vary
depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the application
process through Grants.gov.
• You should review and follow the
Education Submission Procedures for
submitting an application through
Grants.gov that are included in the
application package for this program to
ensure that your application is
submitted timely to the Grants.gov
system.
• To use Grants.gov, you, as the
applicant, must have a D–U–N–S
Number and register in the Central
Contractor Registry (CCR). You should
allow a minimum of five business days
to complete the CCR registration.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit your
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, as described
elsewhere in this section, and submit
your application in paper format.
• You must submit all documents
electronically, including all information
typically included on the Application
for Federal Education Assistance (ED
424), Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs (ED 524), and all
necessary assurances and certifications.
Any narrative sections of your
application should be attached as files
in a .DOC (document), .RTF (rich text),
or .PDF (Portable Document) format.
• Your electronic application must
comply with any page limit
requirements described in this notice.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive an
automatic acknowledgement from
Grants.gov that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. The Department will
retrieve your application from
Grants.gov and send you a second
confirmation by e-mail that will include
a PR/Award number (an ED-specified
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
identifying number unique to your
application).
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission
requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are
unable to submit an application through
the Grants.gov system because—
• You do not have access to the
Internet; or
• You do not have the capacity to
upload large documents to the
Grants.gov system; and
• No later than two weeks before the
application deadline date (14 calendar
days or, if the fourteenth calendar day
before the application deadline date
falls on a Federal holiday, the next
business day following the Federal
holiday), you mail or fax a written
statement to the Department, explaining
which of the two grounds for an
exception prevent you from using the
Internet to submit your application. If
you mail your written statement to the
Department, it must be postmarked no
later than two weeks before the
application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the
Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks
before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your
statement to: Sharon Harris Morgan,
U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue, SW., room 4W250,
Washington, DC 20202–5980. FAX:
(202) 205–5720.
Your paper application must be
submitted in accordance with the mail
or hand delivery instructions described
in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications
by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
may mail (through the U.S. Postal
Service or a commercial carrier), your
application to the Department. You
must mail the original and two copies
of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the
Department at the applicable following
address:
By mail through the U.S. Postal
Service: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Numbers 84.286A or 84.286B),
400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20202–4260; or
By mail through a commercial carrier:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center—Stop 4260,
Attention: (CFDA Numbers 84.286A or
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
84.286B), 7100 Old Landover Road,
Landover, MD 20785–1506.
Regardless of which address you use,
you must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark,
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service,
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier, or
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark, or
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after
the application deadline date, we will
not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
(or a courier service) may deliver your
paper application to the Department by
hand. You must deliver the original and
two copies of your application by hand,
on or before the application deadline
date, to the Department at the following
address: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Numbers 84.286A or 84.286B),
550 12th Street, SW., Room 7041,
Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC
20202–4260.
The Application Control Center
accepts hand deliveries daily between 8
a.m.and 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC
time, except Saturdays, Sundays and
Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of
Paper Applications: If you mail or hand
deliver your application to the
Department:
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the
Department—in Item 4 of the
Application for Federal Education
Assistance (ED 424) the CFDA
number—and suffix letter, if any—of the
competition under which you are
submitting your application.
(2) The Application Control Center
will mail a grant application receipt
acknowledgment to you. If you do not
receive the grant application receipt
acknowledgment within 15 business
days from the application deadline date,
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9057
you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at
(202) 245–6288.
V. Application Review Information
Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this competition are from 34
CFR 75.210. The maximum score for all
of the selection criteria is 100 points.
The maximum score for each criterion is
indicated in parentheses with the
criterion. The maximum number of
points an application may earn based on
the competitive preference priorities
and the selection criteria is 125 points.
The criteria are as follows:
(a) Need for project (15 Points). The
Secretary considers the need for the
proposed project. In determining the
need for the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following
factors:
1. The extent to which the proposed
project will focus on serving or
otherwise addressing the needs of
disadvantaged individuals.
2. The extent to which specific gaps
or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have
been identified and will be addressed by
the proposed project, including the
nature and magnitude of those gaps or
weaknesses.
(b) Quality of the project design (20
Points). The Secretary considers the
quality of the design of the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the
design of the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following
factors:
1. The extent to which the proposed
project is part of a comprehensive effort
to improve teaching and learning and
support rigorous academic standards for
students.
2. The extent to which goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
by the proposed project are clearly
specified and measurable.
3. The extent to which the design for
implementing and evaluating the
proposed project will result in
information to guide possible
replication of project activities or
strategies, including information about
the effectiveness of the approach or
strategies employed by the project.
(c) Quality of project services (20
Points). The Secretary considers the
quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project. In determining the
quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the quality and sufficiency of
strategies for ensuring equal access and
treatment for eligible project
participants who are members of groups
that have traditionally been
underrepresented based on race, color,
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
9058
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
national origin, gender, age, or
disability. In addition, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
1. The extent to which the services to
be provided by the proposed project
reflect up-to-date knowledge from
research and effective practice.
2. The extent to which the training or
professional development services to be
provided by the proposed project are of
sufficient quality, intensity, and
duration to lead to improvements in
practice among the recipients of those
services.
(d) Quality of project personnel (5
Points). The Secretary considers the
quality of the personnel who will carry
out the proposed project. In determining
the quality of project personnel, the
Secretary considers the extent to which
the applicant encourages applications
for employment from persons who are
members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented
based on race, color, national origin,
gender, age, or disability. In addition,
the Secretary considers the following
factors:
1. The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of key
project personnel.
2. The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of
project consultants or subcontractors.
(e) Adequacy of resources (5 Points).
The Secretary considers the adequacy of
resources for the proposed project. In
determining the adequacy of resources
for the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
1. The extent to which the costs are
reasonable in relation to the objectives,
design, and potential significance of the
proposed project.
2. The potential for continued support
of the project after Federal funding
ends, including as appropriate, the
demonstrated commitment of
appropriate entities to such support.
(f) Quality of the management plan
(15 Points). The Secretary considers the
quality of the management plan for the
proposed project. In determining the
quality of the management plan for the
proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
1. The adequacy of the management
plan to achieve the objectives of the
proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined
responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project
tasks.
2. The adequacy of procedures for
ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the
proposed project.
(g) Quality of the project evaluation
(20 Points). The Secretary considers the
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project. In
determining the quality of the
evaluation, the Secretary considers the
following factor:
1. The extent to which the methods of
evaluation include the use of objective
performance measures that are clearly
related to the intended outcomes of the
project and will produce quantitative
and qualitative data to the extent
possible.
Note: A strong evaluation plan should be
included in the application narrative and
should be used, as appropriate, to shape the
development of the project from the
beginning of the grant period. The plan
should include benchmarks to monitor
progress toward specific project objectives
and also outcome measures to assess the
impact on teaching and learning or other
important outcomes for project participants.
More specifically, the plan should identify
the individual and/or organization that has
agreed to serve as evaluator for the project
and describe the qualifications of that
evaluator. The plan should describe the
evaluation design, indicating: (1) What types
of data will be collected; (2) when various
types of data will be collected; (3) what
methods will be used; (4) what instruments
will be developed and when; (5) how the
data will be analyzed; (6) when reports of
results and outcomes will be available; and
(7) how the applicant will use the
information collected through the evaluation
to monitor progress of the funded project and
to provide accountability information both
about success at the initial site and effective
strategies for replication in other settings.
Applicants are encouraged to devote 25–30%
of the grant funds to project evaluations
under each competition.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN). We may also notify you
informally.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Grant Administration: Applicants
approved for funding under this
competition may be required to attend
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a two- or three-day Grants
Administration meeting in Washington,
DC during the first year of the grant. In
addition, applicants should budget for
one Project Directors meeting to be held
in Washington, DC in each subsequent
year of the grant. The cost of attending
these meetings may be paid from Ready
To Teach program grant funds or other
resources.
4. Reporting: At the end of your
project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial
information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year
award, you must submit an annual
performance report that meets the
reporting requirements in section 5483
of the ESEA, as amended by the NCLB
(if you receive a General Programming
Grant) and provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as specified by the
Secretary in 34 CFR 75.118. For specific
requirements on grantee reporting,
please go to https://www.ed.gov/fund/
grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: The
Department is currently developing
measures that will be designed to yield
information on the effectiveness of
grant-supported activities. If funded,
applicants will be expected to
participate in collecting and reporting
data for these measures. We will notify
grantees of the performance measures
once they are developed.
VII. Agency Contacts
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Harris Morgan or Carmelita
Coleman, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20202–5980.
Telephone: (202) 205–5880 (Sharon
Harris Morgan) or (202) 205–5450
(Carmelita Coleman), or by e-mail:
Sharon.Morgan@ed.gov or
Carmelita.Coleman@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the program contact persons
listed in this section.
VIII. Other Information
Electronic Access to This Document:
You may view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: February 17, 2005.
Michael J. Petrilli,
Acting Assistant Deputy Secretary for
Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. E5–764 Filed 2–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Nonproliferation Policy;
Proposed Subsequent Arrangement
Department of Energy.
Notice of subsequent
arrangement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice has been issued
under the authority of section 131 of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 2160). The Department is
providing notice of a proposed
‘‘subsequent arrangement’’ under the
Agreement for Cooperation Concerning
Civil Uses of Atomic Energy between
the United States and Canada and
Agreement for Cooperation in the
Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy
between the United States and the
European Atomic Energy Community
(EURATOM).
This subsequent arrangement
concerns the retransfer of 59,172 kg of
U.S.-origin natural uranium
hexafluoride, 40,000 kg of which is
uranium, from Cameco Corp., Port
Hope, Ontario, Canada to Urenco
Capenhurst, United Kingdom. The
material, which is now located at
Cameco Corp., Port Hope, Ontario, will
be transferred to Urenco Capenhurst for
toll enrichment. Upon completion of the
enrichment, Urenco Capenhurst will
transfer the material for final use by the
Florida Power & Light Company.
Cameco Corp. originally obtained the
uranium hexafluoride under NRC
Export License XSOU8798.
In accordance with section 131 of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
we have determined that this
subsequent arrangement is not inimical
to the common defense and security.
This subsequent arrangement will
take effect no sooner than fifteen days
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
after the date of publication of this
notice.
For the Department of Energy.
Michele R. Smith,
Acting Director, Office of Nonproliferation
Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–3649 Filed 2–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Science; Notice of Renewal of
the High Energy Physics Advisory
Panel
Pursuant to section 14(a)(2)(A) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act,
App.2, and section 102–3.65, title 41,
Code of Federal Regulations and
following consultation with the
Committee Management Secretariat,
General Services Administration, notice
is hereby given that the High Energy
Physics Advisory Panel has been
renewed for a six-month period,
beginning in February 2005.
The Panel will provide advice to the
Associate Director for High Energy
Physics, Office of Science (DOE), and
the Assistant Director, Mathematical &
Physical Sciences Directorate (NSF), on
long-range planning and priorities in the
national high-energy physics program.
The Secretary of Energy had determined
that renewal of the Panel is essential to
conduct business of the Department of
Energy and the National Science
Foundation and is in the public interest
in connection with the performance of
duties imposed by law upon the
Department of Energy. The Panel will
continue to operate in accordance with
the provisions of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), the
General Services Administration Final
Rule on Federal Advisory Committee
Management, and other directives and
instructions issued in implementation
of those acts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Rachel Samuel at (202) 586–3279.
Issued in Washington, DC on February 11,
2005.
James N. Solit,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–3510 Filed 2–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Environmental Management SiteSpecific Advisory Board, Idaho
National Engineering and
Environmental Laboratory
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Department of Energy.
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
9059
Notice of open meeting.
SUMMARY: This notice announces a
meeting of the Environmental
Management Site-Specific Advisory
Board (EMSSAB), Idaho National
Engineering and Environmental
Laboratory. The Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92–463, 86
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of
this meeting be announced in the
Federal Register.
DATES: Tuesday, March 15, 2005, 8
a.m.–6 p.m.; Wednesday, March 16,
2005, 8 a.m.–5 p.m.
Opportunities for public participation
will be held Tuesday, March 15, from
12:15 to 12:30 p.m. and 5:45 to 6 p.m.;
and on Wednesday, March 16, from
11:45 a.m. to 12 noon and 4 to 4:15 p.m.
Additional time may be made available
for public comment during the
presentations.
These times are subject to change as
the meeting progresses, depending on
the extent of comment offered. Please
check with the meeting facilitator to
confirm these times.
ADDRESSES: Willard Arts Center, 498
‘‘A’’ Street, Idaho Falls, ID 83402.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Peggy Hinman, INEEL Board
Administrator, North Wind, Inc., PO
Box 51174, Idaho Falls, ID 83405, Phone
(208) 557–7885, or visit the Board’s
Internet Home page at https://
www.ida.net/users/cab.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of the Board: The purpose of
the Board is to make recommendations
to DOE in the areas of environmental
restoration, waste management, and
related activities.
Tentative Agenda: (Agenda topics
may change up to the day of the
meeting; please contact Peggy Hinman
for the most current agenda or visit the
Board’s Internet site at https://
www.ida.net/users/cab/):
• Cleanup and closure of the Idaho
Nuclear Technology and Engineering
Center (including the high-level waste
program, the spent nuclear fuel
program, the Foster-Wheeler facility,
and the Idaho Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
Disposal Facility)
• Engineering Evaluation and Cost
Analysis for the Accelerated Retrieval
Project
• Independent Risk Assessment
prepared by the Consortium for Risk
Evaluation with Stakeholder
Participation in support of DOE’s end
state vision for the Idaho National
Laboratory
Public Participation: The meeting is
open to the public. Written statements
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 36 (Thursday, February 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9053-9059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-764]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Innovation and Improvement Program (OII); Overview
Information; Ready To Teach Program; Notice Inviting Applications for
New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2005
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Numbers: 84.286A and
84.286B
Dates: Applications Available: February 25, 2005.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: March 24, 2005.
Date of Pre-Application Meeting: March 11, 2005 (webcast).
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: April 20, 2005.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: June 20, 2005.
Eligible Applicants: For General Programming Grants (84.286A)--A
nonprofit telecommunications entity or partnership of
telecommunications entities.
For Digital Educational Programming Grants (84.286B)--A local
public telecommunications entity, as defined in section 397(12) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that is able to demonstrate a
capacity for the development and distribution of educational and
instructional television programming of high quality. Under section
397(12) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, the term public
telecommunications entity means any enterprise which--
(A) Is a public broadcast station or a noncommercial
telecommunications entity; and
(B) Disseminates public telecommunications services to the public.
Estimated Available Funds: $14,290,752.
Estimated Range of Awards: $1,500,000-$5,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $2,500,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 3-6.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months for 84.286A and up to 36 months for
84.286B.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Ready to Teach program awards two types of
competitive grants: (a) Grants to carry out a national
telecommunications-based program to improve teaching in core curriculum
areas (General Programming Grants); and (b) digital educational
programming grants to develop, produce, and distribute innovative
educational and instructional video programming (Digital Educational
Programming Grants). The Ready to Teach program is designed to assist
elementary school and secondary school teachers in preparing all
students to achieve challenging State academic content and student
academic achievement standards in core curriculum areas.
Statutory Requirements: As set forth in the program statute, to be
eligible to receive a General Programming Grant (84.286A), an applicant
must--
(1) Demonstrate, in its application, that it will use the public
broadcasting
[[Page 9054]]
infrastructure, the Internet, and school digital networks, where
available, to deliver video and data in an integrated service to train
teachers in the use of materials and learning technologies for
achieving challenging State academic content and student academic
achievement standards;
(2) Make an assurance in its application that its project will be
conducted in cooperation with appropriate State educational agencies,
local educational agencies, and State or local nonprofit public
telecommunications entities; and
(3) Make an assurance in its application that a significant portion
of the benefits available for elementary schools and secondary schools
from its project will be available to schools of local educational
agencies that have a high percentage of children eligible under title I
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB).
In addition, as required by the program statute, in order to be
eligible to receive a Digital Educational Programming Grant (84.286B),
an applicant must propose activities to facilitate the development of
educational programming that shall--
(1) Include student assessment tools to provide feedback on student
academic achievement;
(2) Include built-in teacher utilization and support components to
ensure that teachers understand and can easily use the content of the
programming with group instruction or for individual student use;
(3) Be created for, or adaptable to, challenging State academic
content standards and student academic achievement standards; and
(4) Be capable of distribution through digital broadcasting and
school digital networks.
Priority: This priority is from the notice of final priority for
Scientifically Based Evaluation Methods, published in the Federal
Register on January 25, 2005 (70 FR 3586).
Competitive Preference Priority: For FY 2005 this priority is a
competitive preference priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award
up to an additional 25 points to an application, depending on the
extent to which the application meets this priority.
Note: In awarding additional points to applications that address
this competitive preference priority, we will consider only those
applications that have top-ranked scores on the basis of the
Selection Criteria in section V. of this notice.
The priority is: The Secretary establishes a priority for projects
proposing an evaluation plan that is based on rigorous scientifically
based research methods to assess the effectiveness of a particular
intervention. The Secretary intends that this priority will allow
program participants and the Department to determine whether the
project produces meaningful effects on student achievement or teacher
performance.
Evaluation methods using an experimental design are best for
determining project effectiveness. Thus, when feasible, the project
must use an experimental design under which participants--e.g.,
students, teachers, classrooms, or schools--are randomly assigned to
participate in the project activities being evaluated or to a control
group that does not participate in the project activities being
evaluated.
If random assignment is not feasible, the project may use a quasi-
experimental design with carefully matched comparison conditions. This
alternative design attempts to approximate a randomly assigned control
group by matching participants--e.g., students, teachers, classrooms,
or schools--with non-participants having similar pre-program
characteristics.
In cases where random assignment is not possible and participation
in the intervention is determined by a specified cutting point on a
quantified continuum of scores, regression discontinuity designs may be
employed.
For projects that are focused on special populations in which
sufficient numbers of participants are not available to support random
assignment or matched comparison group designs, single-subject designs
such as multiple baseline or treatment-reversal or interrupted time
series that are capable of demonstrating causal relationships can be
employed.
Proposed evaluation strategies that use neither experimental
designs with random assignment nor quasi-experimental designs using a
matched comparison group nor regression discontinuity designs will not
be considered responsive to the priority when sufficient numbers of
participants are available to support these designs. Evaluation
strategies that involve too small a number of participants to support
group designs must be capable of demonstrating the causal effects of an
intervention or program on those participants.
The proposed evaluation plan must describe how the project
evaluator will collect--before the project intervention commences and
after it ends--valid and reliable data that measure the impact of
participation in the program or in the comparison group.
If the priority is used as a competitive preference priority,
points awarded under this priority will be determined by the quality of
the proposed evaluation method. In determining the quality of the
evaluation method, we will consider the extent to which the applicant
presents a feasible, credible plan that includes the following:
(1) The type of design to be used (that is, random assignment or
matched comparison). If matched comparison, include in the plan a
discussion of why random assignment is not feasible.
(2) Outcomes to be measured.
(3) A discussion of how the applicant plans to assign students,
teachers, classrooms, or schools to the project and control group or
match them for comparison with other students, teachers, classrooms, or
schools.
(4) A proposed evaluator, preferably independent, with the
necessary background and technical expertise to carry out the proposed
evaluation. An independent evaluator does not have any authority over
the project and is not involved in its implementation.
In general, depending on the implemented program or project, under
a competitive preference priority, random assignment evaluation methods
will receive more points than matched comparison evaluation methods.
Definitions
As used in this notice--
Scientifically based research (section 9101(37) of the ESEA as
amended by NCLB, 20 U.S.C. 7801(37)):
(A) Means research that involves the application of rigorous,
systematic, and objective procedures to obtain reliable and valid
knowledge relevant to education activities and programs; and
(B) Includes research that--
(i) Employs systematic, empirical methods that draw on observation
or experiment;
(ii) Involves rigorous data analyses that are adequate to test the
stated hypotheses and justify the general conclusions drawn;
(iii) Relies on measurements or observational methods that provide
reliable and valid data across evaluators and observers, across
multiple measurements and observations, and across studies by the same
or different investigators;
(iv) Is evaluated using experimental or quasi-experimental designs
in which individuals entities, programs, or activities are assigned to
different conditions and with appropriate controls to evaluate the
effects of the condition of interest, with a preference
[[Page 9055]]
for random-assignment experiments, or other designs to the extent that
those designs contain within-condition or across-condition controls;
(v) Ensures that experimental studies are presented in sufficient
detail and clarity to allow for replication or, at a minimum, offer the
opportunity to build systematically on their findings; and
(vi) Has been accepted by a peer-reviewed journal or approved by a
panel of independent experts through a comparably rigorous, objective,
and scientific review.
Random assignment or experimental design means random assignment of
students, teachers, classrooms, or schools to participate in a project
being evaluated (treatment group) or not participate in the project
(control group). The effect of the project is the difference in
outcomes between the treatment and control groups.
Quasi experimental designs include several designs that attempt to
approximate a random assignment design.
Carefully matched comparison groups design means a quasi-
experimental design in which project participants are matched with non-
participants based on key characteristics that are thought to be
related to the outcome.
Regression discontinuity design means a quasi-experimental design
that closely approximates an experimental design. In a regression
discontinuity design, participants are assigned to a treatment or
control group based on a numerical rating or score of a variable
unrelated to the treatment such as the rating of an application for
funding. Eligible students, teachers, classrooms, or schools above a
certain score (``cut score'') are assigned to the treatment group and
those below the score are assigned to the control group. In the case of
the scores of applicants' proposals for funding, the ``cut score'' is
established at the point where the program funds available are
exhausted.
Single subject design means a design that relies on the comparison
of treatment effects on a single subject or group of single subjects.
There is little confidence that findings based on this design would be
the same for other members of the population.
Treatment reversal design means a single subject design in which a
pre-treatment or baseline outcome measurement is compared with a post-
treatment measure. Treatment would then be stopped for a period of
time, a second baseline measure of the outcome would be taken, followed
by a second application of the treatment or a different treatment. For
example, this design might be used to evaluate a behavior modification
program for disabled students with behavior disorders.
Multiple baseline design means a single subject design to address
concerns about the effects of normal development, timing of the
treatment, and amount of the treatment with treatment-reversal designs
by using a varying time schedule for introduction of the treatment and/
or treatments of different lengths or intensity.
Interrupted time series design means a quasi-experimental design in
which the outcome of interest is measured multiple times before and
after the treatment for program participants only.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7257--7257d.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 81,
82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The notice of final priority for
Scientifically Based Evaluation Methods, published in the Federal
Register on January 25, 2005 (70 FR 3586).
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of
higher education only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $14,290,752.
Estimated Range of Awards: $1,500,000-$5,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $2,500,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 3-6.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months for 84.286A and up to 36 months for
84.286B.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants:
For General Programming Grants (84.286A)--A nonprofit
telecommunications entity or partnership of nonprofit
telecommunications entities.
For Digital Educational Programming Grants (84.286B)--A local
public telecommunications entity, as defined in section 397(12) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, that is able to demonstrate a
capacity for the development and distribution of educational and
instructional television programming of high quality. Under section
397(12) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, the term public
telecommunications entity means any enterprise which--
(A) Is a public broadcast station or a noncommercial
telecommunications entity; and
(B) Disseminates public telecommunications services to the public.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: An applicant submitting an application
under the competition for General Programming Grants (84.286A) is not
required to provide matching funds. However, to be eligible to receive
a Digital Educational Programming Grant (84.286B), an applicant must
contribute non-Federal matching funds in an amount equal to not less
than 100 percent of the amount of the grant. Such matching funds may
include funds provided for the transition to digital broadcasting, as
well as in-kind contributions.
An entity that receives a General Programming Grant or a Digital
Educational Programming Grant, may not use more than 5 percent of the
amount received under the grant for administrative purposes.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: You may obtain an
application package via Internet or from the Education Publications
Center (ED Pubs). To obtain a copy via Internet use the following
address: https://www.ed.gov/pubs/edpubs.html. To obtain a copy from ED
Pubs, write or call the following: Education Publications Center (ED
Pubs), P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398. Telephone (toll free): 1-
877-433-7827. FAX: (301) 470-1244. If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call (toll free): 1-877-576-7734.
You may also contact ED Pubs at its Web site: https://www.ed.gov/
pubs/edpubs.html or you may contact ED Pubs at its e-mail address:
edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application from ED Pubs, be sure to identify
this competition as follows: CFDA number 84.286A or 84.286B, as
appropriate.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain a copy of the application
package in an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the program contact
person listed elsewhere in this notice under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT (see VII. Agency Contacts).
[[Page 9056]]
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this program.
Notice of Intent to Apply: Applicants that plan to apply for
funding under this program are encouraged to indicate an intent to
apply via e-mail notification sent to readytoteachintent@ed.gov no
later than March 24, 2005. Applicants that fail to supply this e-mail
notification may still apply for funding under this program. Page Limit
for Program Narrative: The program narrative is where you, the
applicant, address the selection criteria using the following
standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the program narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Although no page limit is required, applicants are encouraged to
confine the program narrative to no more than 50 pages.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: February 25, 2005.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: March 24, 2005.
Date of Pre-Application Meeting: March 11, 2005, at 3 p.m.,
Washington, DC time. The Department intends to hold a live webcast to
permit potential applicants to pose questions about this grant
competition and other technology grant competitions being held by OII.
Following the live presentation, the webcast will be archived and
remain online until the application deadline date. Interested
applicants should link to the following site to participate in or
access the Web cast: https://www.kidzonline.org/tepwebcast. You may
submit your intent to participate in the Web cast to tepwebcast@ed.gov.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: April 20, 2005.
Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically or by mail or hand delivery if you qualify
for an exception to the electronic submission requirement, please refer
to section IV.6. Other Submission Requirements in this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: June 20, 2005.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference the regulations outlining
funding restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this
notice.
6. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under
this program must be submitted electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in accordance with the instructions in
this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
Applications for grants under the Ready To Teach program-CFDA
Numbers 84.286A and 84.286B must be submitted electronically using the
Grants.gov Apply site. Through this site, you will be able to download
a copy of the application package, complete it offline, and then upload
and submit your application. You may not e-mail an electronic copy of a
grant application to us.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in
this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant application for Ready To Teach
at: https://www.grants.gov. You must search for the downloadable
application package for this program by the CFDA number. Do not include
the CFDA number's alpha suffix in your search.
Please note the following:
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are time and date
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted with a
date/time received by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. We will not
consider your application if it was received by the Grants.gov system
later than 4:30 p.m. on the application deadline date. When we retrieve
your application from Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are
rejecting your application because it was submitted after 4:30 p.m. on
the application deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the application process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this program to ensure that
your application is submitted timely to the Grants.gov system.
To use Grants.gov, you, as the applicant, must have a D-U-
N-S Number and register in the Central Contractor Registry (CCR). You
should allow a minimum of five business days to complete the CCR
registration.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your
application in paper format.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information typically included on the Application for Federal
Education Assistance (ED 424), Budget Information--Non-Construction
Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and certifications. Any
narrative sections of your application should be attached as files in a
.DOC (document), .RTF (rich text), or .PDF (Portable Document) format.
Your electronic application must comply with any page
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive an automatic acknowledgement from Grants.gov that contains a
Grants.gov tracking number. The Department will retrieve your
application from Grants.gov and send you a second confirmation by e-
mail that will include a PR/Award number (an ED-specified
[[Page 9057]]
identifying number unique to your application).
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application
through the Grants.gov system because--
You do not have access to the Internet; or
You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to
the Grants.gov system; and
No later than two weeks before the application deadline
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception
prevent you from using the Internet to submit your application. If you
mail your written statement to the Department, it must be postmarked no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Sharon Harris Morgan,
U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 4W250,
Washington, DC 20202-5980. FAX: (202) 205-5720.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the
mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a
commercial carrier), your application to the Department. You must mail
the original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the applicable
following address:
By mail through the U.S. Postal Service: U.S. Department of
Education, Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA Numbers 84.286A
or 84.286B), 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202-4260; or
By mail through a commercial carrier: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center--Stop 4260, Attention: (CFDA Numbers 84.286A
or 84.286B), 7100 Old Landover Road, Landover, MD 20785-1506.
Regardless of which address you use, you must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark,
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service,
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier, or
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark, or
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original
and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Numbers 84.286A or 84.286B), 550 12th Street, SW., Room 7041,
Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily
between 8 a.m.and 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, except Saturdays,
Sundays and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you mail
or hand deliver your application to the Department:
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by the
Department--in Item 4 of the Application for Federal Education
Assistance (ED 424) the CFDA number--and suffix letter, if any--of the
competition under which you are submitting your application.
(2) The Application Control Center will mail a grant application
receipt acknowledgment to you. If you do not receive the grant
application receipt acknowledgment within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition are
from 34 CFR 75.210. The maximum score for all of the selection criteria
is 100 points. The maximum score for each criterion is indicated in
parentheses with the criterion. The maximum number of points an
application may earn based on the competitive preference priorities and
the selection criteria is 125 points. The criteria are as follows:
(a) Need for project (15 Points). The Secretary considers the need
for the proposed project. In determining the need for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
1. The extent to which the proposed project will focus on serving
or otherwise addressing the needs of disadvantaged individuals.
2. The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be
addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude
of those gaps or weaknesses.
(b) Quality of the project design (20 Points). The Secretary
considers the quality of the design of the proposed project. In
determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
1. The extent to which the proposed project is part of a
comprehensive effort to improve teaching and learning and support
rigorous academic standards for students.
2. The extent to which goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable.
3. The extent to which the design for implementing and evaluating
the proposed project will result in information to guide possible
replication of project activities or strategies, including information
about the effectiveness of the approach or strategies employed by the
project.
(c) Quality of project services (20 Points). The Secretary
considers the quality of the services to be provided by the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the quality and
sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal access and treatment for
eligible project participants who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color,
[[Page 9058]]
national origin, gender, age, or disability. In addition, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
1. The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed
project reflect up-to-date knowledge from research and effective
practice.
2. The extent to which the training or professional development
services to be provided by the proposed project are of sufficient
quality, intensity, and duration to lead to improvements in practice
among the recipients of those services.
(d) Quality of project personnel (5 Points). The Secretary
considers the quality of the personnel who will carry out the proposed
project. In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability. In addition, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
1. The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,
of key project personnel.
2. The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,
of project consultants or subcontractors.
(e) Adequacy of resources (5 Points). The Secretary considers the
adequacy of resources for the proposed project. In determining the
adequacy of resources for the proposed project, the Secretary considers
the following factors:
1. The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the
objectives, design, and potential significance of the proposed project.
2. The potential for continued support of the project after Federal
funding ends, including as appropriate, the demonstrated commitment of
appropriate entities to such support.
(f) Quality of the management plan (15 Points). The Secretary
considers the quality of the management plan for the proposed project.
In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
1. The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of
the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks.
2. The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the proposed project.
(g) Quality of the project evaluation (20 Points). The Secretary
considers the quality of the evaluation to be conducted of the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary
considers the following factor:
1. The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use of
objective performance measures that are clearly related to the intended
outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and qualitative
data to the extent possible.
Note: A strong evaluation plan should be included in the
application narrative and should be used, as appropriate, to shape
the development of the project from the beginning of the grant
period. The plan should include benchmarks to monitor progress
toward specific project objectives and also outcome measures to
assess the impact on teaching and learning or other important
outcomes for project participants. More specifically, the plan
should identify the individual and/or organization that has agreed
to serve as evaluator for the project and describe the
qualifications of that evaluator. The plan should describe the
evaluation design, indicating: (1) What types of data will be
collected; (2) when various types of data will be collected; (3)
what methods will be used; (4) what instruments will be developed
and when; (5) how the data will be analyzed; (6) when reports of
results and outcomes will be available; and (7) how the applicant
will use the information collected through the evaluation to monitor
progress of the funded project and to provide accountability
information both about success at the initial site and effective
strategies for replication in other settings. Applicants are
encouraged to devote 25-30% of the grant funds to project
evaluations under each competition.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN). We may also notify you informally.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Grant Administration: Applicants approved for funding under this
competition may be required to attend a two- or three-day Grants
Administration meeting in Washington, DC during the first year of the
grant. In addition, applicants should budget for one Project Directors
meeting to be held in Washington, DC in each subsequent year of the
grant. The cost of attending these meetings may be paid from Ready To
Teach program grant funds or other resources.
4. Reporting: At the end of your project period, you must submit a
final performance report, including financial information, as directed
by the Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an
annual performance report that meets the reporting requirements in
section 5483 of the ESEA, as amended by the NCLB (if you receive a
General Programming Grant) and provides the most current performance
and financial expenditure information as specified by the Secretary in
34 CFR 75.118. For specific requirements on grantee reporting, please
go to https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: The Department is currently developing
measures that will be designed to yield information on the
effectiveness of grant-supported activities. If funded, applicants will
be expected to participate in collecting and reporting data for these
measures. We will notify grantees of the performance measures once they
are developed.
VII. Agency Contacts
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Harris Morgan or Carmelita
Coleman, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20202-5980. Telephone: (202) 205-5880 (Sharon Harris
Morgan) or (202) 205-5450 (Carmelita Coleman), or by e-mail:
Sharon.Morgan@ed.gov or Carmelita.Coleman@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the program contact persons listed in this
section.
VIII. Other Information
Electronic Access to This Document: You may view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
[[Page 9059]]
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
Dated: February 17, 2005.
Michael J. Petrilli,
Acting Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. E5-764 Filed 2-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P