City of Peoria and Village of Peoria Heights, IL-Adverse Discontinuance-Pioneer Industrial Railway Company, 9125-9126 [05-3549]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such
filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the NASD. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
No. SR–NASD–2005–018 and should be
submitted on or before March 17, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–752 Filed 2–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5001]
Determination Under Section 620(Q) of
the Foreign Assistance Act and
Section 512 of the Foreign Operations,
Export Financing and Related
Programs Appropriations Act, 2005
Relating To Assistance To the
Dominican Republic
Pursuant to the authority vested in me
by section 620(q) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961, as amended
(FAA), section 512 of the Foreign
Operations, Export Financing, and
Related Programs Appropriations Act,
2005 (FOAA) (Div. D, Public Law 108–
477), and by Executive Order 12163, as
amended by Executive Order 13346, I
hereby determine that assistance to the
Dominican Republic is in the national
interest of the United States and thereby
waive with respect to that country, the
application of section 620(q) of the FAA
from the date it would otherwise have
been applicable and section 512 of the
FOAA, as well as any provision of law
that is the same or substantially the
same as such provisions, including
subsequently enacted provisions.
This determination shall be reported
to Congress and published in the
Federal Register.
17 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
Dated: December 18, 2005.
Colin L. Powell,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05–3591 Filed 2–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–29–P
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Notice of Change to U.S. Note 2(d) to
Subchapter XIX of Chapter 98 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Section 2004(k) of the
Miscellaneous Trade and Technical
Corrections Act of 2004, Public Law
108–429, designated Mauritius as
eligible for certain additional benefits
under the African Growth and
Opportunity Act (AGOA) for one year,
beginning October 1, 2004. This notice
modifies the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTS) to
reflect this designation.
DATES: Effective February 9, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick Coleman, Director for African
Affairs, Office of the United States
Trade Representative, (202) 395–9514.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
AGOA (Title I of the Trade and
Development Act of 2000, Pub. L. 106–
200) provides preferential tariff
treatment for imports of certain textile
and apparel products of beneficiary subSaharan African countries. On
December 3, 2004, the President signed
the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical
Corrections Act (‘‘the Act’’), which
designates Mauritius as eligible for
benefits under section 112(b)(3)(B) of
the AGOA for one year, beginning
October 1, 2004.
In Proclamation 6969 (62 FR 4413),
the President delegated to the United
States Trade Representative (USTR) the
authority to make rectifications,
technical or conforming changes, or
similar modifications to the HTS.
Pursuant to the authority delegated to
the USTR in Proclamation 6969, U.S.
Note 2(d) to subchapter XIX of chapter
98 of the HTS is modified by inserting
‘‘Mauritius’’ in alphabetical sequence in
the list of countries effective for the
period ending on midnight September
30, 2005, at which time ‘‘Mauritius’’
shall be deleted from the list. Importers
claiming preferential tariff treatment
under the AGOA for entries of textile
and apparel articles should ensure that
those entries meet the applicable visa
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9125
requirements. Importers seeking
retroactive duty treatment pursuant to
section 2004(k)(2) of the Act should
direct their inquiries to the Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection.
Robert B. Zoellick,
United States Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 05–3473 Filed 2–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190–W5–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Docket No. AB–878]
City of Peoria and Village of Peoria
Heights, IL—Adverse
Discontinuance—Pioneer Industrial
Railway Company
On November 16, 2004, the City of
Peoria and the Village of Peoria Heights,
IL (Cities or applicants), filed an adverse
application under 49 U.S.C. 10903,
requesting that the Surface
Transportation Board authorize the
discontinuance of service by Pioneer
Industrial Railway Company (PIRY)
over a line of railroad known as the
Kellar Branch. The Kellar Branch is
located in Peoria Heights and Peoria and
runs between milepost 1.71 and
milepost 10.0. The line traverses United
States Postal Service ZIP Codes 61602
and 61616 and includes no stations.
The Cities state that the Kellar Branch
was fully abandoned by the Chicago,
Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company
and that Peoria acquired the line from
the Rock Island Trustee in 1984.
According to the Cities, Peoria entered
into an operating agreement with Peoria
and Pekin Union Railway Company
(P&PU) to serve shippers. P&PU
obtained an exemption from 49 U.S.C.
10901 to operate the line. Peoria and
Pekin Union Railway Co.—Exemption
from 49 U.S.C. 10901, Finance Docket
No. 30545 (ICC served Sept. 18, 1984).
Peoria Heights later obtained a 25
percent ownership interest in the Kellar
Branch. In 1998, PIRY became the sole
operator of the line as assignee of
P&PU’s rights under the operating
agreement with the Cities. Pioneer
Industrial Railway Co.—Lease and
Operation Exemption—Peoria, Peoria
Heights & Western Railroad, STB
Finance Docket No. 33549 (STB served
Feb. 20, 1998).
Applicants assert that the operating
agreement with PIRY expired on July
10, 2004, and that, prior to that date,
they notified PIRY that they intended to
contract with a different operator for
continued rail service on the line. The
Cities indicate that they have entered
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
9126
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 36 / Thursday, February 24, 2005 / Notices
into an operating agreement with
Central Illinois Railroad Company
(CIRY), which has obtained an
exemption from 49 U.S.C. 10901 to
operate the line. Central Illinois
Railroad Company—Operation
Exemption—Rail Line of the City of
Peoria and Village of Peoria Heights, in
Peoria and Peoria Heights, Peoria
County, IL, STB Finance Docket No.
34518 (STB served June 28, 2004).1
According to the Cities, PIRY has
indicated that it will not voluntarily
relinquish its operating authority on the
Kellar Branch, thus necessitating the
filing of this application.
The Cities point out that the operating
agreement between Peoria and CIRY is
temporary until Peoria can complete
construction of a connection between
the Kellar Branch and a 1.9-mile rail
line to the west acquired from Union
Pacific Railroad Company in 2001. See
City of Peoria, IL—Construction of
Connecting Track Exemption—Peoria
County, IL, STB Finance Docket No.
34395 (STB served Sept. 27, 2004).
Applicants state that, after completion
of the connecting track, CIRY will
provide service from the west to the two
shippers located on the western part of
the Kellar Branch and the third shipper,
located on the eastern part of the
Branch, will be served from the east by
CIRY or another rail carrier arranged for
by Peoria. According to applicants,
these shippers either support the
discontinuance or are neutral on the
matter. The Cities propose to turn the
6.29-mile segment of the line located in
between the active shippers into a
recreational trail. The Cities state that
they seek discontinuance rather than
abandonment authority here because the
Kellar Branch had already been
abandoned when Peoria acquired it
without the need for Board acquisition
authority.
In a decision served in this
proceeding on September 10, 2004, the
Cities were granted a waiver of filing
requirements in 49 CFR 1152 and were
given permission to file an adverse
discontinuance application containing
the following information: (1) The name
and address of the applicant; (2) the
name and address of counsel; (3) a
detailed map of the facilities involved;
(4) the total carloads broken out for each
of the shippers currently using the line;
(5) a summary of the principal
commodities handled; (6) a summary
operating plan for operations of the
substitute carrier; (7) certification that
the City’s current or proposed
1 By a decision served on July 1, 2004, the Board
denied a request by PIRY for stay of the
effectiveness of the exemption.
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:49 Feb 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
operations comply, or will comply, with
all federal and state safety requirements;
(8) an opinion of counsel that the prior
lease agreement with PIRY expired in
accordance with its terms; (9)
documentation from the Cities that
authorizes the operations of the
substituted service; (10) a statement on
behalf of the Cities of the reasons for the
application and the benefits that will be
obtained if the application is approved;
and (11) supporting statements from
shippers. The Cities were also granted a
waiver of all notice and publication
requirements, but were required to serve
a copy of their application on the
shippers on the line, PIRY, all
connecting carriers, and the Illinois
Commerce Commission.
There is no indication that the line
contains any federally granted rights-ofway. Any documentation in the Cities’
possession will be made available
promptly to those requesting it.
Applicants’ entire case for
discontinuance of service was filed with
the application.
The interests of affected railroad
employees will be protected by the
conditions set forth in Oregon Short
Line R. Co.—Abandonment—Goshen,
360 I.C.C. 91 (1979).
Any interested person may file
written comments concerning the
proposed discontinuance or protests
(including the protestant’s entire
opposition case). Because this is a
discontinuance proceeding and not an
abandonment, trail use/rail banking,
and public use requests are not
appropriate. Also, offers of financial
assistance (OFA) will not be entertained
in this proceeding.2
Persons opposing the proposed
adverse discontinuance who wish to
participate actively and fully in the
process should file a protest by March
21, 2005. Persons who may oppose the
discontinuance, but who do not wish to
participate fully in the process by
submitting verified statements of
witnesses containing detailed evidence
should also file comments by March 21,
2005. Parties seeking information
concerning the filing of protests should
refer to section 1152.25. The due date
for applicants’ reply is April 5, 2005.
2 As noted in the waiver decision, on July 23,
2004, PIRY filed a notice of intent to file an OFA
to purchase the Kellar Branch and requested certain
information and data from the Cities. PIRY has
characterized the Cities’ application as seeking an
adverse abandonment rather than a discontinuance,
in light of applicants’ trail use proposal. The Cities
filed a motion to reject PIRY’s filing, arguing that,
under Board precedent, OFAs to purchase are not
entertained in discontinuance proceedings. PIRY
replied to the Cities’ motion on August 12, 2004.
This issue will be resolved in the decision on the
merits in this proceeding.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
All filings in response to this notice
must refer to STB Docket No. AB–878
and must be sent to: (1) Surface
Transportation Board, 1925 K Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20423–0001; and
(2) Thomas F. McFarland, Thomas F.
McFarland, P.C. 208 South LaSalle
Street, Suite 1890 Chicago, IL 60604–
1112. Filings may be submitted either
via the Board’s e-filing format or in the
traditional paper format. Any person
using e-filing should comply with the
instructions found on the Board’s
‘‘https://www.stb.dot.gov’’ Web site, at
the ‘‘E-FILING’’ link. Any person
submitting a filing in the traditional
paper format should send an original
and 10 copies of the filing to the Board
with a certificate of service. Except as
otherwise set forth in section 1152,
every document filed with the Board
must be served on all parties to this
proceeding. 49 CFR 1104.12(a).
Persons seeking further information
concerning abandonment/
discontinuance procedures may contact
the Board’s Office of Public Services at
(202) 565–1592 or refer to the full
abandonment/discontinuance
regulations at 49 CFR part 1152.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.]
The September 10 decision waived
compliance with environmental and
historic regulations because the Cities
proposed their application as a request
to substitute operators on the line.
Accordingly, no environmental
assessment will be prepared in this
proceeding.3
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at ‘‘https://
www.stb.dot.gov.’’
Decided: February 17, 2005.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–3549 Filed 2–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
3 The Board there noted, however, that, in light
of the issue raised regarding whether this filing
should be for adverse abandonment or adverse
discontinuance, the Cities should be aware that
they run the risk of delaying a ruling on their
application if the Board concludes that the
application should be for abandonment, because
compliance with the Board’s environmental and
historic regulations might then be necessary.
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 36 (Thursday, February 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9125-9126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-3549]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Docket No. AB-878]
City of Peoria and Village of Peoria Heights, IL--Adverse
Discontinuance--Pioneer Industrial Railway Company
On November 16, 2004, the City of Peoria and the Village of Peoria
Heights, IL (Cities or applicants), filed an adverse application under
49 U.S.C. 10903, requesting that the Surface Transportation Board
authorize the discontinuance of service by Pioneer Industrial Railway
Company (PIRY) over a line of railroad known as the Kellar Branch. The
Kellar Branch is located in Peoria Heights and Peoria and runs between
milepost 1.71 and milepost 10.0. The line traverses United States
Postal Service ZIP Codes 61602 and 61616 and includes no stations.
The Cities state that the Kellar Branch was fully abandoned by the
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company and that Peoria
acquired the line from the Rock Island Trustee in 1984. According to
the Cities, Peoria entered into an operating agreement with Peoria and
Pekin Union Railway Company (P&PU) to serve shippers. P&PU obtained an
exemption from 49 U.S.C. 10901 to operate the line. Peoria and Pekin
Union Railway Co.--Exemption from 49 U.S.C. 10901, Finance Docket No.
30545 (ICC served Sept. 18, 1984). Peoria Heights later obtained a 25
percent ownership interest in the Kellar Branch. In 1998, PIRY became
the sole operator of the line as assignee of P&PU's rights under the
operating agreement with the Cities. Pioneer Industrial Railway Co.--
Lease and Operation Exemption--Peoria, Peoria Heights & Western
Railroad, STB Finance Docket No. 33549 (STB served Feb. 20, 1998).
Applicants assert that the operating agreement with PIRY expired on
July 10, 2004, and that, prior to that date, they notified PIRY that
they intended to contract with a different operator for continued rail
service on the line. The Cities indicate that they have entered
[[Page 9126]]
into an operating agreement with Central Illinois Railroad Company
(CIRY), which has obtained an exemption from 49 U.S.C. 10901 to operate
the line. Central Illinois Railroad Company--Operation Exemption--Rail
Line of the City of Peoria and Village of Peoria Heights, in Peoria and
Peoria Heights, Peoria County, IL, STB Finance Docket No. 34518 (STB
served June 28, 2004).\1\ According to the Cities, PIRY has indicated
that it will not voluntarily relinquish its operating authority on the
Kellar Branch, thus necessitating the filing of this application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ By a decision served on July 1, 2004, the Board denied a
request by PIRY for stay of the effectiveness of the exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cities point out that the operating agreement between Peoria
and CIRY is temporary until Peoria can complete construction of a
connection between the Kellar Branch and a 1.9-mile rail line to the
west acquired from Union Pacific Railroad Company in 2001. See City of
Peoria, IL--Construction of Connecting Track Exemption--Peoria County,
IL, STB Finance Docket No. 34395 (STB served Sept. 27, 2004).
Applicants state that, after completion of the connecting track, CIRY
will provide service from the west to the two shippers located on the
western part of the Kellar Branch and the third shipper, located on the
eastern part of the Branch, will be served from the east by CIRY or
another rail carrier arranged for by Peoria. According to applicants,
these shippers either support the discontinuance or are neutral on the
matter. The Cities propose to turn the 6.29-mile segment of the line
located in between the active shippers into a recreational trail. The
Cities state that they seek discontinuance rather than abandonment
authority here because the Kellar Branch had already been abandoned
when Peoria acquired it without the need for Board acquisition
authority.
In a decision served in this proceeding on September 10, 2004, the
Cities were granted a waiver of filing requirements in 49 CFR 1152 and
were given permission to file an adverse discontinuance application
containing the following information: (1) The name and address of the
applicant; (2) the name and address of counsel; (3) a detailed map of
the facilities involved; (4) the total carloads broken out for each of
the shippers currently using the line; (5) a summary of the principal
commodities handled; (6) a summary operating plan for operations of the
substitute carrier; (7) certification that the City's current or
proposed operations comply, or will comply, with all federal and state
safety requirements; (8) an opinion of counsel that the prior lease
agreement with PIRY expired in accordance with its terms; (9)
documentation from the Cities that authorizes the operations of the
substituted service; (10) a statement on behalf of the Cities of the
reasons for the application and the benefits that will be obtained if
the application is approved; and (11) supporting statements from
shippers. The Cities were also granted a waiver of all notice and
publication requirements, but were required to serve a copy of their
application on the shippers on the line, PIRY, all connecting carriers,
and the Illinois Commerce Commission.
There is no indication that the line contains any federally granted
rights-of-way. Any documentation in the Cities' possession will be made
available promptly to those requesting it. Applicants' entire case for
discontinuance of service was filed with the application.
The interests of affected railroad employees will be protected by
the conditions set forth in Oregon Short Line R. Co.--Abandonment--
Goshen, 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979).
Any interested person may file written comments concerning the
proposed discontinuance or protests (including the protestant's entire
opposition case). Because this is a discontinuance proceeding and not
an abandonment, trail use/rail banking, and public use requests are not
appropriate. Also, offers of financial assistance (OFA) will not be
entertained in this proceeding.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ As noted in the waiver decision, on July 23, 2004, PIRY
filed a notice of intent to file an OFA to purchase the Kellar
Branch and requested certain information and data from the Cities.
PIRY has characterized the Cities' application as seeking an adverse
abandonment rather than a discontinuance, in light of applicants'
trail use proposal. The Cities filed a motion to reject PIRY's
filing, arguing that, under Board precedent, OFAs to purchase are
not entertained in discontinuance proceedings. PIRY replied to the
Cities' motion on August 12, 2004. This issue will be resolved in
the decision on the merits in this proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Persons opposing the proposed adverse discontinuance who wish to
participate actively and fully in the process should file a protest by
March 21, 2005. Persons who may oppose the discontinuance, but who do
not wish to participate fully in the process by submitting verified
statements of witnesses containing detailed evidence should also file
comments by March 21, 2005. Parties seeking information concerning the
filing of protests should refer to section 1152.25. The due date for
applicants' reply is April 5, 2005.
All filings in response to this notice must refer to STB Docket No.
AB-878 and must be sent to: (1) Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001; and (2) Thomas F. McFarland,
Thomas F. McFarland, P.C. 208 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1890 Chicago,
IL 60604-1112. Filings may be submitted either via the Board's e-filing
format or in the traditional paper format. Any person using e-filing
should comply with the instructions found on the Board's ``https://
www.stb.dot.gov'' Web site, at the ``E-FILING'' link. Any person
submitting a filing in the traditional paper format should send an
original and 10 copies of the filing to the Board with a certificate of
service. Except as otherwise set forth in section 1152, every document
filed with the Board must be served on all parties to this proceeding.
49 CFR 1104.12(a).
Persons seeking further information concerning abandonment/
discontinuance procedures may contact the Board's Office of Public
Services at (202) 565-1592 or refer to the full abandonment/
discontinuance regulations at 49 CFR part 1152. [Assistance for the
hearing impaired is available through the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.]
The September 10 decision waived compliance with environmental and
historic regulations because the Cities proposed their application as a
request to substitute operators on the line. Accordingly, no
environmental assessment will be prepared in this proceeding.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Board there noted, however, that, in light of the issue
raised regarding whether this filing should be for adverse
abandonment or adverse discontinuance, the Cities should be aware
that they run the risk of delaying a ruling on their application if
the Board concludes that the application should be for abandonment,
because compliance with the Board's environmental and historic
regulations might then be necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at
``https://www.stb.dot.gov.''
Decided: February 17, 2005.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-3549 Filed 2-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P